Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “DROSOPHILA”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 505 records · Page 28Linked to original sources

Drosophila laminin binds to mammalian nidogen and to heparan sulfate proteoglycan.

A Drosophila laminin that has the chain composition alpha5 beta1 gamma1, relative to mammalian laminins, bound human and mouse nidogen almost as strongly as mouse laminin-1 (alpha1 beta1 gamma1) in solid-phase assays, and had only a fourfold lower affinity in a radioligand competition test. This is due to a short, highly conserved sequence that occurs in both laminin gamma1 chains and which binds nidogen. When the single conservative amino acid difference between the two sequences (Tyr-->His) was introduced into the mouse laminin binding module gamma1 III4 it failed to cause any change of binding. A high affinity between Drosophila laminin and mouse nidogen resulted in the formation of a stable complex in solution. Drosophila laminin also bound to the mouse heparan sulfate proteoglycan perlecan and the formation of this complex was inhibited by heparin, but not by chondroitin sulfate. In addition, a weaker connection between the core protein of mouse perlecan and Drosophila laminin can be mediated through nidogen. Elastase and other proteases degraded Drosophila laminin to a restricted number of larger fragments (40-300 kDa), almost all of which were bound to a heparin affinity column. Three fragments could be displaced at low salt concentration and were derived from the short arms of the Drosophila laminin, as shown by sequence analysis. A more strongly bound 50-kDa fragment apparently comprised the globular domains LG2 and LG3 derived from the C-terminal part of its alpha chain. Therefore, Drosophila laminin and mouse laminin-1 differ in certain aspects of protease stability and heparin-binding sites that, in part, can be attributed to their different alpha chains. The data suggest the existence of a nidogen analog and heparan sulfate proteoglycans in Drosophila, which remain to be identified.

Animals↗

Evolutionary dynamics of wAu-like Wolbachia variants in neotropical Drosophila spp.

Wolbachia bacteria are common intracellular symbionts of arthropods and have been extensively studied in Drosophila. Most research focuses on two Old Word hosts, Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans, and does not take into account that some of the Wolbachia associations in these species may have evolved only after their fast global expansion and after the exposure to Wolbachia of previously isolated habitats. Here we looked at Wolbachia of Neotropical Drosophila species. Seventy-one lines of 16 Neotropical Drosophila species sampled in different regions and at different time points were analyzed. Wolbachia is absent in lines of Drosophila willistoni collected before the 1970s, but more recent samples are infected with a strain designated wWil. Wolbachia is absent in all other species of the willistoni group. Polymorphic wWil-related strains were detected in some saltans group species, with D. septentriosaltans being coinfected with at least four variants. Based on wsp and ftsZ sequence data, wWil of D. willistoni is identical to wAu, a strain isolated from D. simulans, but can be discriminated when using a polymorphic minisatellite marker. In contrast to wAu, which infects both germ line and somatic tissues of D. simulans, wWil is found exclusively in the primordial germ line cells of D. willistoni embryos. We report on a pool of closely related Wolbachia strains in Neotropical Drosophila species as a potential source for the wAu strain in D. simulans. Possible evolutionary scenarios reconstructing the infection history of wAu-like Wolbachia in Neotropical Drosophila species and the Old World species D. simulans are discussed.

Animals↗

Small nuclear ribonucleoproteins of Drosophila: identification of U1 RNA-associated proteins and their behavior during heat shock.

In Drosophila, two nuclear proteins of approximately 26,000 and 14,000 molecular weight are recognized by a human autoimmune antibody for mammalian ribonucleoprotein (RNP) particles that contain U1 small nuclear RNA. The antibody-selected Drosophila RNP contains, in addition to these two proteins, a single RNA species that has been identified as U1 by hybridization with a cloned Drosophila U1 DNA probe. Small nuclear RNP isolated from human cells under the same conditions as used for Drosophila and selected by the anti-U1 RNP-specific antibody contains eight proteins, two of which are similar in molecular weight to the two Drosophila U1 RNP proteins. Thus, even though the nucleotide sequences of Drosophila and human U1 RNA are about 72% homologous, and the corresponding RNPs are both recognized by the same human autoantibody, Drosophila U1 RNP appears to have a simpler protein complement than its mammalian counterpart. The two Drosophila U1 RNA-associated proteins are synthesized at normal or slightly increased rates during the heat shock response and are incorporated into antibody-recognizable RNP complexes. This raises the possibility that U1 RNP is an indispensable nuclear element for cell survival during heat shock.

Animals↗

Cross genome phylogenetic analysis of human and Drosophila G protein-coupled receptors: application to functional annotation of orphan receptors.

BACKGROUND: The cell-membrane G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) are one of the largest known superfamilies and are the main focus of intense pharmaceutical research due to their key role in cell physiology and disease. A large number of putative GPCRs are 'orphans' with no identified natural ligands. The first step in understanding the function of orphan GPCRs is to identify their ligands. Phylogenetic clustering methods were used to elucidate the chemical nature of receptor ligands, which led to the identification of natural ligands for many orphan receptors. We have clustered human and Drosophila receptors with known ligands and orphans through cross genome phylogenetic analysis and hypothesized higher relationship of co-clustered members that would ease ligand identification, as related receptors share ligands with similar structure or class. RESULTS: Cross-genome phylogenetic analyses were performed to identify eight major groups of GPCRs dividing them into 32 clusters of 371 human and 113 Drosophila proteins (excluding olfactory, taste and gustatory receptors) and reveal unexpected levels of evolutionary conservation across human and Drosophila GPCRs. We also observe that members of human chemokine receptors, involved in immune response, and most of nucleotide-lipid receptors (except opsins) do not have counterparts in Drosophila. Similarly, a group of Drosophila GPCRs (methuselah receptors), associated in aging, is not present in humans. CONCLUSION: Our analysis suggests ligand class association to 52 unknown Drosophila receptors and 95 unknown human GPCRs. A higher level of phylogenetic organization was revealed in which clusters with common domain architecture or cellular localization or ligand structure or chemistry or a shared function are evident across human and Drosophila genomes. Such analyses will prove valuable for identifying the natural ligands of Drosophila and human orphan receptors that can lead to a better understanding of physiological and pathological roles of these receptors.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

[Effects of diethylhexyl phthalate on lipid peroxidation and the life-span in Drosophila melanogaster].

OBJECTIVE: To observe the effects of diethlhexyl phthalate (DEHP) on lipid peroxidation and the life span in Drosophila melanogaster. METHODS: Fed Drosophila with the concentration 0.20% DEHP of exposure after 0, 14, 28 days, the activity of total superoxide dismutase (SOD), CuZn-SOD and the concentration of malondialdehyde were determined. At the same time, the longevity test was carried out to examine the effect of DEHP on the Drosophila's lifespan. RESULTS: The lifespan of Drosophila was shortened in a dose of DEHP exposed groups. The indexes of mean life span (MLS), 50% lethal time and mean maximum life span in three DEHP-treated groups (concentration of 0.05%, 0.10% and 0.20%) were lower than those of the controlled group respectively (P < 0.01 or P < 0.05). The MLS of both Drosophila sexes were reduced from the control of 64 days and 59 days to the test 60 days-52 days and 54 days-49 days respectively. DEHP decreased the activity of SOD (P < 0.01 or P < 0.05), and lead to a time-dependent relation and an increase in the concentration of malondialdehyde (P < 0.01 or P < 0.05) in the DEHP-exposed Drosophila groups. CONCLUSION: DEHP might promote the process of lipid peroxidation and shorten the life span in Drosophila melanogaster. It should be one of the reasons in the senescence of Drosophila.

Animals↗

[Molecular phylogenetic relationships of Drosophila immigrans species group based on H2a-H2b spacer and Cyt b sequences].

In order to investigate molecular phylogenetic relationships of Drosophila immigrans species group, nucleotide sequences of H2a-H2b spacer regions and partial nucleotide sequences of Cytochrome b gene for five specieses subgroup in Drosophila immigrans species group and D. hydei which was selected as outgroup were acquired. Phylogenetic trees were reconstructed using maximum parsimony, maximum likelihood, neighbor joining and Bayesian methods based on H2a-H2b and Cyt b DNA sequences. The results indicated that Drosophila curviceps species subgroup is located at the base of molecular trees, diverged first in this group; the second clade is Drosophila quadrilineata species subgroup; the third is Drosophila hypocausta species subgroup; the fourth is Drosophila immigrans species subgroup; Drosophila nasuta species subgroup is the last diverged clade. Moreover, the phylogentic relationships of seven specieses in Drosophila nasuta subgroup was investigated.

Animals↗

Inactivation of mRNA cap-binding protein complex in Drosophila melanogaster embryos under heat shock.

We have studied the role of Drosophila 35-kDa cap-binding protein (CBP) and CBP complex in the mechanism of messenger RNA discrimination established in heat-shocked Drosophila embryos. Drosophila 35-kDa CBP is functionally equivalent to the mammalian eucaryotic initiation factor (eIF)-4E and CBP complex, which includes eIF-4E, might be the counterpart of mammalian eIF-4F. By using anti-eIF-4E antibodies, we found that although translation of the bulk of normal messengers in Drosophila lysates was very dependent on eIF-4E, the mRNAs for the heat shock proteins (hsps) (particularly hsp70 mRNA and with the exception of hsp83 mRNA) were translated almost independently of this factor, suggesting that they may have unstructured leaders. Accordingly, hsp70 mRNA and, to a lesser extent, the mRNAs for the small hsps were found to be more resistant to inhibition by K+ than normal and hsp83 mRNAs. Moreover, Drosophila CBP complex was able to rescue partial but specifically the synthesis of normal proteins when added to a lysate from heat-shocked embryos. However, no significant effect was obtained by Drosophila eIF-4E or eIF-2. Consistent with these results, we found a great decrease in the amount of the CBP complex purified from heat-shocked embryos as compared with normal ones, whereas the amounts of free eIF-4E purified from either source were similar. Together, the above results suggest that some modification leading to the disruption of Drosophila CBP complex may account, at least to some extent, for the mRNA discrimination established in heat-shocked Drosophila embryos.

Animals↗

Two novel annexins from Drosophila melanogaster. Cloning, characterization, and differential expression in development.

The annexins are a family of homologous Ca2(+)- and phospholipid-binding proteins that until now have only been found in vertebrates. cDNA clones encoding two novel annexins from Drosophila melanogaster were isolated and characterized. RNA blots indicate that the messages for the two Drosophila proteins are differentially expressed in development, with one message being expressed throughout development, while the other is only found in early embryos and adult flies. In situ hybridizations localize the two Drosophila genes to 93B and 19A-4,7. A similarly high degree of homology relates Drosophila annexins to different vertebrate annexins, indicating that the Drosophila annexins are not the invertebrate homologues of particular mammalian annexins but that they constitute novel members of the annexin gene family. In continuation with a recently established terminology, the Drosophila annexins will be named annexins IX and X. The biochemical properties of Drosophila annexin X were investigated using recombinant protein. Similar to vertebrate annexins, annexin X bound to liver membranes and liposomes containing phosphatidylserine in a calcium-dependent manner but not to liposomes containing phosphatidylcholine. In addition, annexin X partitioned into the detergent phase of Triton X-114 as a function of calcium. The conservation of the annexin family of Ca2(+)-binding proteins in invertebrates suggests that they have a basic function in cells which is not peculiar to vertebrate biology, and the availability of the Drosophila sequences will open avenues for mutational studies of these functions.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Embryonic development of axon pathways in the Drosophila CNS. II. Behavior of pioneer growth cones.

We have identified the neurons that pioneer the major CNS axon tracts in the Drosophila embryo and determined their trajectory and fasciculation choices using serial section electron microscopy. Although Drosophila pioneer neurons make choices similar to those of their grasshopper homologs, there are interesting differences that reflect the much smaller nervous system size and the much faster rate of development characteristic of Drosophila. For example, where 2 longitudinal tracts are pioneered independently in grasshopper, only one is formed in Drosophila. This change is due to a change in fasciculation affinity of the pCC growth cone. Additionally, the intersegmental (IS) nerve is pioneered by a different neuron in Drosophila (aCC) than in the grasshopper (U1) because the smaller Drosophila CNS places the IS nerve within filopodial reach of the aCC soma, while in the grasshopper it is not. Drosophila growth cones explore a much more confined neuropil volume than do grasshopper growth cones but can also sample a larger fraction of the CNS as well. For this reason, some cell-cell recognition events critical to pathfinding in the grasshopper embryo may not be as essential in Drosophila. Nevertheless, many specific cellular affinities have been retained through the evolutionary divergence of these 2 species.

Animals↗

Evidence for beta 2-microglobulin-like and H-2-like antigenic determinants in Drosophila.

Serologic evidence for the existence of beta 2-microglobulin-, (beta 2m) like and H-2-like antigenic determinants in Drosophila are presented. Drosophila-cultured cells and larvae extract were shown to react specifically with a rabbit anti-rat beta 2m and a rabbit anti-mouse beta 2m antisera. G-200 pooled fractions from Drosophila larvae were shown to react with beta 2m-eluted and glycin-absorbed antisera, but not with beta 2m-absorbed or glycin-eluted antisera. These fractions also quantitatively inhibited the heterologous reaction between the anti-beta 2m antisera and purified human and rat beta 2m. The lack of reactivity of other rabbit antisera or normal serum with Drosophila, as well as the efficiency of absorption of anti-beta 2m reactivity by either rat or KCO% (Drosophila) cells, further supports the presence of beta 2m epitopes on Drosophila cells. Data are also presented showing that certain anti-H-2 alloantisera react with Drosophila. That this reactivity is indeed due to anti-H-2 antibodies is suggested by several lines of evidence, including the removal of cytotoxic alloantibodies and lack of reactivity by other mouse antisera and monoclonal reagents. Preliminary data suggest that the H-2-like and beta 2m-like determinants are physically associated on the cell surface of Drosophila cells. These findings have important implications on current concepts concerning the evolutionary origin and physiologic role of beta 2m and the major histocompatibility complex.

Animals↗

Resolution and pharmacological analysis of the voltage-dependent calcium channels of Drosophila larval muscles.

Voltage-dependent calcium channels play a role in many cellular phenomena. Very little is known about Ca2+ channels in Drosophila, especially those in muscles. Existing literature on neuronal Ca2+ channels of Drosophila suggests that their pharmacology may be distinct from that of vertebrate Ca2+ channels. This raises questions on the pharmacology and diversity of Ca2+ channels in Drosophila muscles. Here we show that the Ca2+ channel current in the body-wall muscles of Drosophila larvae consists of two main components. One component is sensitive to 1,4-dihydropyridines and diltiazem, which block vertebrate L-type Ca2+ channels. The second component is sensitive to amiloride, which blocks vertebrate T-type Ca2+ channels. In contrast to Drosophila brain membrane preparations in which a majority of the Ca2+ channels are phenylalkylamine-sensitive but dihydropyridine-insensitive, the major current in the muscles was dihydropyridine-sensitive but relatively less sensitive to verapamil. This might indicate an underlying tissue specific distribution of distinct subtypes of dihydropyridine/phenylalkylamine-sensitive Ca2+ channels in Drosophila. Low verapamil sensitivity of the dihydropyridine-sensitive current of Drosophila muscles also set it apart from the vertebrate L-type channels which are sensitive to 1,4-dihydropyridines, benzothiazepines as well as phenylalkylamines. The dihydropyridine-sensitive current in Drosophila muscles activated in a similar voltage range as the vertebrate L-type current. As with the vertebrate current, blockade by dihydropyridines was voltage dependent.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Amiloride↗

Identification of one intron loss and phylogenetic evolution of Dfak gene in the Drosophila melanogaster species group.

Intron loss and its evolutionary significance have been noted in Drosophila. The current study provides another example of intron loss within a single-copy Dfak gene in Drosophila. By using polymerase chain reaction (PCR), we amplified about 1.3 kb fragment spanning intron 5-10, located in the position of Tyr kinase (TyK) domain of Dfak gene from Drosophila melanogaster species group, and observed size difference among the amplified DNA fragments from different species. Further sequencing analysis revealed that D. melanogaster and D. simulans deleted an about 60 bp of DNA fragment relative to other 7 Drosophila species, such as D. elegans, D. ficusphila, D. biarmipes, D. takahashii, D. jambulina, D. prostipennis and D. pseudoobscura, and the deleted fragment located precisely in the position of one intron. The data suggested that intron loss might have occurred in the Dfak gene evolutionary process of D. melanogaster and D. simulans of Drosophila melanogaster species group. In addition, the constructed phylogenetic tree based on the Dfak TyK domains clearly revealed the evolutionary relationships between subgroups of Drosophila melanogaster species group, and the intron loss identified from D. melanogaster and D. simulans provides a unique diagnostic tool for taxonomic classification of the melanogaster subgroup from other group of genus Drosophila.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Autonomous replication in Drosophila melanogaster tissue culture cells.

This study addresses the ability of DNA fragments from various sources to mediate autonomous DNA replication in cultured Drosophila melanogaster cells. We created a series of plasmids containing genomic DNA fragments from the Ultrabithorax gene of Drosophila and test ed them for autonomous replication after transfection into Schneider line 2 cells. We found that all plasmids containing Drosophila DNA were able to replicate autonomously, as were random human and Escherichia coli genomic DNA fragments. Most of the plasmids were detectable 18 days after transfection in the absence of selection, suggesting that transfected DNA is maintained in Drosophila cells without rapid loss or degradation. The finding that all plasmids containing Drosophila, human or bacterial DNA replicate autonomously in Drosophila cells suggests that the signals that direct autonomous replication in Drosophila contain a low degree of sequence specificity. A two-dimensional gel analysis of initiation on one of the plasmids was consistent with many dispersed initiation sites. Low sequence specificity and dispersed initiation sites also characterize autonomous replication in human cells and Xenopus eggs and may be general properties of autonomous replication in animal cells.

Animals↗

The mechanism of telomere protection: a comparison between Drosophila and humans.

Drosophila telomeres are maintained by transposition of specialized retrotransposons rather than by telomerase activity, and their stability is independent of the sequence of DNA termini. Recent studies have identified several proteins that protect Drosophila telomeres from fusion events. These proteins include the telomere capping factors HP1/ORC-associated protein (HOAP) and heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1), the Rad50 and Mre11 DNA repair proteins that are required for HOAP and HP1 localization at telomeres, and the ATM kinase. Another telomere-protecting factor identified in Drosophila is UbcD1, a polypeptide highly homologous to class I ubiquitin-conjugating E2 enzymes. In addition, it has been shown that HP1 and both components of the Drosophila Ku70/80 heterodimer act as negative regulators of telomere length. Except for HOAP, all these proteins are conserved in humans and are associated with human telomeres. Collectively, these results indicate that Drosophila is an excellent model system for the analysis of the mechanisms of telomere maintenance. In past and current studies, 15 Drosophila genes have been identified that prevent telomeric fusion, and it has been estimated that the Drosophila genome contains at least 40 genes required for telomere protection. We believe that the molecular characterization of these genes will lead to identification of many novel human genes with roles in telomere maintenance.

Animals↗

Fitness effects and transmission routes of a microsporidian parasite infecting Drosophila and its parasitoids.

A microsporidian infection was discovered in laboratory cultures of Drosophila species. Ultrastructural examination suggested it belonged to the poorly characterized species Tubulinosema kingi, and morphological and sequence data are presented. We explored how T. kingi affected the fitness of Drosophila melanogaster and D. subobscura, as well as the fitness of 2 of their parasitoids, Asobara tabida and Pachycrepoideus vindemiae. In Drosophila, infections caused changes in most of the traits we looked at that were associated with fitness, in particular causing a 34-55% reduction in early-life fecundity. Parasitoid fitness was affected more severely by infection than that of their hosts, with pupal mortality in particular increasing by 75-89%. We investigated the most important routes of transmission for T. kingi in a laboratory setting. Letting Drosophila larvae feed on medium contaminated with spores from infected dead flies resulted in 100% infection. Low levels of transmission (<10%) were found between larvae, and vertically between mothers and their offspring. Parasitoids developing in infected hosts all became infected, but infected adults were neither able to transmit the pathogen to their offspring nor to their offspring's Drosophila host, either directly, or via contamination of the ovipositor or other body parts. A field survey of Drosophila and their parasitoids in southern England revealed no natural infections. We discuss the potential importance of Microsporidia in parasitoid-host interactions, and for those working with Drosophila in the laboratory.

Animals↗

The Drosophila protein kinase LK6 is regulated by ERK and phosphorylates the eukaryotic initiation factor eIF4E in vivo.

In Drosophila cells, phosphorylation of eIF4E (eukaryotic initiation factor 4E) is required for growth and development. In Drosophila melanogaster, LK6 is the closest homologue of mammalian Mnk1 and Mnk2 [MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase) signal-integrating kinases 1 and 2 respectively] that phosphorylate mammalian eIF4E. Mnk1 is activated by both mitogen- and stress-activated signalling pathways [ERK (extracellular-signal-regulated kinase) and p38 MAPK], whereas Mnk2 contains a MAPK-binding motif that is selective for ERKs. LK6 possesses a binding motif similar to that in Mnk2. In the present study, we show that LK6 can phosphorylate eIF4E at the physiological site. LK6 activity is increased by the ERK signalling pathway and not by the stress-activated p38 MAPK signalling pathway. Consistent with this, LK6 binds ERK in mammalian cells, and this requires an intact binding motif. LK6 can bind to eIF4G in mammalian cells, and expression of LK6 increases the phosphorylation of the endogenous eIF4E. In Drosophila S2 Schneider cells, LK6 binds the ERK homologue Rolled, but not the p38 MAPK homologue. LK6 phosphorylates Drosophila eIF4E in vitro. The phosphorylation of endogenous eIF4E in Drosophila cells is increased by activation of the ERK pathway but not by arsenite, an activator of p38 MAPK. RNA interference directed against LK6 significantly decreases eIF4E phosphorylation in Drosophila cells. These results show that LK6 binds to ERK and is activated by ERK signalling and it is responsible for phosphorylating eIF4E in Drosophila.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Drosophila phosphoinositide-dependent kinase-1 regulates apoptosis and growth via the phosphoinositide 3-kinase-dependent signaling pathway.

Phosphoinositide-dependent kinase-1 (PDK-1) is a central mediator of the cell signaling between phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) and various intracellular serine/threonine kinases including Akt/protein kinase B (PKB), p70 S6 kinases, and protein kinase C. Recent studies with cell transfection experiments have implied that PDK-1 may be involved in various cell functions including cell growth and apoptosis. However, despite its pivotal role in cellular signalings, the in vivo functions of PDK-1 in a multicellular system have rarely been investigated. Here, we have isolated Drosophila PDK-1 (dPDK-1) mutants and characterized the in vivo roles of the kinase. Drosophila deficient in the dPDK-1 gene exhibited lethality and an apoptotic phenotype in the embryonic stage. Conversely, overexpression of dPDK-1 increased cell and organ size in a Drosophila PI3K-dependent manner. dPDK-1 not only could activate Drosophila Akt/PKB (Dakt1), but also substitute the in vivo functions of its mammalian ortholog to activate Akt/PKB. This functional interaction between dPDK-1 and Dakt1 was further confirmed through genetic analyses in Drosophila. On the other hand, cAMP-dependent protein kinase, which has been proposed as a possible target of dPDK-1, did not interact with dPDK-1. In conclusion, our findings provide direct evidence that dPDK-1 regulates cell growth and apoptosis during Drosophila development via the PI3K-dependent signaling pathway and demonstrate our Drosophila system to be a powerful tool for elucidating the in vivo functions and targets of PDK-1.

3-Phosphoinositide-Dependent Protein Kinases↗

Transient expression of genes introduced into cultured cells of Drosophila.

Recombinant plasmids in which the sequence encoding the bacterial chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT; acetyl-CoA:chloramphenicol 3-O-acetyltransferase, EC 2.3.1.28) has been placed under the control of Drosophila heat shock protein 70 (hsp 70) or copia promoters have been introduced into cultured cells of two Drosophila species (Schneider II line of Drosophila melanogaster and D. immigrans) as calcium-phosphate complexes. Within 1-2 days after transfection functional CAT enzyme was detected in cells exposed to either CAT recombinant. The expression of the bacterial information depends on the activity of the Drosophila promoters because plasmids in which the Drosophila DNA fragments were fused to the CAT coding sequence in inverted orientation did not support the synthesis of CAT enzyme activity. Low levels of CAT activity and of hybrid mRNA were detected in cells transformed with hsp-cat recombinants when the cells were maintained at room temperature, and both mRNA levels and CAT activity increased substantially after a brief exposure to 37 degrees C. hsp-cat mRNA has the same 5' terminus as authentic Drosophila hsp 70 messenger. These experiments document a practical system for the introduction and expression of isolated genes in cultured cells of Drosophila.

Acetyltransferases↗