Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Contraindications”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 505 records · Page 28Linked to original sources
PubMed2001

Age is not a contraindication to pancreaticoduodenectomy.

The incidence of pancreatic cancer has increased threefold over the last 40 years with the greatest rate of growth occurring in the elderly. In the past it was suggested that elderly patients tolerated pancreaticoduodenectomy less well than younger patients with higher mortality rates. This single-institution experience examines the question of whether age is a significant factor in relation to morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Between 1994 and 1999 outcomes of 122 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy were reviewed. There were 48 patients 70 years of age and older and 74 patients less than 70 years of age. Both groups were compared with respect to preoperative clinical prognostic determinates and perioperative factors affecting morbidity and mortality. There was no significant difference between the two groups comparing their comorbidities, use of preoperative antibiotics, intraoperative blood loss, or length of hospital stay (11.9 and 10.8 days respectively). The two groups were also similar with regard to pathologic diagnosis with pancreatic adenocarcinoma being the most frequently encountered neoplasm. There was one death in the less-than-70-year-old group and none in the older group. No significant difference in the rate of complications was appreciated. These data demonstrate that pancreaticoduodenectomy can be performed safely in patients 70 years of age and older with morbidity and mortality rates similar to those of younger individuals.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2002

The role of sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy in the diagnosis and management of lower gastrointestinal disorders: technique, indications, and contraindications.

Flexible sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy have revolutionized the clinical management of colonic diseases. Colonoscopy has a broad range of indications, including evaluating lower GI symptoms such as lower GI bleeding, evaluating abnormal radiographic findings, and screening and surveillance for colon cancer. Colonoscopy is increasingly being used therapeutically. Patient evaluation, patient instructions, and colonic preparation before colonoscopy are essential for safe and efficient colonoscopy. Intravenous sedation reduces patient pain and anxiety during colonoscopy, but requires monitoring by pulse oximetry and automated measurements of vital signs. An experienced colonoscopist can complete colonoscopy in 90% or more of cases, using maneuvers to maintain the colonic lumen in view, straighten the colonoscope, and avoid looping during colonic intubation.

Colonic Diseases↗
PubMed1997

Isolated upright gastroesophageal reflux is not a contraindication for antireflux surgery.

BACKGROUND: Patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease who reflux only in the upright position are thought to have a less severe abnormality. Controversy exists over whether these patients should be considered candidates for antireflux surgery. METHODS: A total of 224 consecutive patients with increased esophageal acid exposure on 24-hour pH monitoring were classified as having upright (n = 54), supine (n = 72), or bipositional (n = 98) reflux and were evaluated by manometry and endoscopy. Of these, 116 patients had a laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Their clinical outcome at a median of 12 months (range 4 to 44 months) was compared. RESULTS: Patients with upright reflux had a lower prevalence of a structurally defective lower esophageal sphincter, fewer hiatal hernias, and less esophageal injury when compared to those with bipositional reflux (p < 0.005). Excellent (asymptomatic) or good outcome (minor symptoms not requiring acid suppression therapy) was achieved in 86% of the patients with upright reflux, 90% of those with supine reflux, and 89% of those with bipositional reflux. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with upright reflux have less complicated, earlier disease and have results equivalent to those patients with supine and bipositional reflux after antireflux surgery.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

[Contraindicated medical references and vasoactive agents in arterial pathology of the lower limbs].

INTRODUCTION: Treatment of arteriopathy of the lower limbs (ALL) with vasoactive drugs must follow French health laws recently introduced in regard to the prescription of unuseful drugs and treatments and the frequency at which some patients resort to specific drugs and treatments. Prescription of vasoactive drugs in ALL requires the existence of functional discomfort. Prescription of only one vasoactive drug is sufficient. CURRENT KNOWLEDGE AND KEY POINTS: Results of published clinical trials demonstrate the efficacy of vasoactive drugs for the relief of claudication related to arteriopathy. To conform to the rules of the European Drug Agency, treatment with vasoactive drugs which improve the walking distance is recommended as "symptomatic treatment of arterial claudication in ALL". Iloprost is only used in the treatment of permanent ischemia. Prescription of vasoactive drugs is part of a scheme of therapeutic indications that are well known and rigorous. Rules of hygiene and reduction of risk factors are the essential preliminary elements. In the case of arterial claudication due to femoral or distal obliteration, chemical medication is suggested, whereas in the case of iliac lesion, angioplasty should be considered. FUTURE PROSPECTS AND PROJECTS: Walking is recommended in all the cases; however, usually less than a quarter of all patients will conform to this recommendation. Vasoactive drugs thus find their place in the therapeutic scheme. Evaluation of the efficiency of vasoactive drugs rises above simple measures of the walking distance, rather integrating quality of life and usefulness of the treatment.

Angioplasty↗
PubMed1999

Radiotherapy following mastectomy: indication and contraindication of chest wall irradiation.

PURPOSE: To determine in which cases radiotherapy of the chest wall following mastectomy is indicated, based on the local recurrent rate in patients with locally advanced breast cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 1984 until 1994, 105 patients who had four or more histopathologically confirmed axillary nodes metastases, or T3-4Nany, were subjected to mastectomy and were administered radiotherapy postoperatively using the hockey-stick field, which included the ipsilateral supraclavicular fossa and internal mammary nodes, except the chest wall. Median age was 51 years old (range, 23 to 82 years old). Eighty-five patients underwent radical mastectomy, 18 modified radical mastectomy, and 2 extended radical mastectomy. Fraction size was 2 Gy/day, the weekly fraction size was 10 Gy and the total dose ranged from 44 Gy to 54 Gy (median 50 Gy). Seventy-four patients were administered adjuvant chemotherapy, and 61 patients were administered hormone therapy. RESULTS: The 5-year disease-free survival rates of the whole study population were 66%. The 5-year chest wall recurrence rates were 10%. The 5-year chest wall recurrence rates of the patients who had no vascular invasion (n = 19) and the patients who had definite vascular invasion (n = 38) were 0% and 24%, respectively (p = 0.036). All the patients who presented chest wall recurrence had four or more axillary nodes metastases. Nine of the 10 patients who presented chest wall recurrence had definite vascular invasion, while there was no information about vascular invasion for the remaining patient. Factors such as age, pathological subtypes, tumor location, estrogen receptors, extent of resection, chemotherapy, and hormone therapy did not influence the development of chest wall recurrence. CONCLUSION: Among patients with breast cancer who have four or more positive axillary nodes or T3-4Nany, those who have no vascular invasion or less than 4 axillary nodes metastases do not need to be subjected to chest wall irradiation after radical mastectomy.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Severe renal dysfunction complicating cardiogenic shock is not a contraindication to mechanical support as a bridge to cardiac transplantation.

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated outcomes in patients with cardiogenic shock and severe renal dysfunction treated with ventricular assist devices (VAD) as a bridge to cardiac transplantation. BACKGROUND: Previous reports have documented poor survival in patients with cardiogenic shock and severe renal dysfunction treated with VAD. METHODS: We surveyed 215 consecutive patients who received a VAD from 1992 to 2000 and selected patients who had a serum creatinine > or =3.0 mg/dl at the time of VAD placement. Demographic, laboratory, and clinical outcome data were collected. RESULTS: Eighteen patients met the inclusion criteria. Mean serum creatinine at the time of VAD placement was 4.0 +/- 0.7 mg/dl (range 3.0 to 5.2 mg/dl). Seven patients required temporary renal support with continuous venovenous hemodialysis (CVVHD). Eleven patients underwent cardiac transplantation. At six months post-transplantation, mean serum creatinine was 2.0 +/- 0.6 mg/dl (range 1.3 to 3.5 mg/dl). None of the transplanted patients required subsequent renal support. Seven patients died with a VAD before transplantation. Three died early (<1 month) after VAD placement, and all three required CVVHD until death. Four patients survived for >1 month after VAD placement; all four had resolution of renal dysfunction with mean serum creatinine of 1.9 +/- 1.2 mg/dl (range 0.8 to 3.6 mg/dl) without the need for renal support. Overall 30-day and six-month survival after VAD placement, survival to transplantation, and survival one year post-transplantation were similar to patients without severe renal dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: Contemporary use of VAD leads to resolution of severe renal dysfunction in most cardiogenic shock patients and comparable long-term outcomes to patients without renal dysfunction.

Adult↗