Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Back”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 505 records · Page 28Linked to original sources

Acupuncture and dry-needling for low back pain.

BACKGROUND: Although low-back pain is usually a self-limiting and benign disease that tends to improve spontaneously over time, a large variety of therapeutic interventions are available for its treatment. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of acupuncture for the treatment of non-specific low-back pain and dry-needling for myofascial pain syndrome in the low-back region. SEARCH STRATEGY: We updated the searches from 1996 to February 2003 in CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE. We also searched the Chinese Cochrane Centre database of clinical trials and Japanese databases to February 2003. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized trials of acupuncture (that involves needling) for adults with non-specific (sub)acute or chronic low-back pain, or dry-needling for myofascial pain syndrome in the low-back region. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed methodological quality (using the criteria recommended by the Cochrane Back Review Group) and extracted data. The trials were combined using meta-analyses methods or levels of evidence when the data reported did not allow statistical pooling. MAIN RESULTS: Thirty-five RCTs were included; 20 were published in English, seven in Japanese, five in Chinese and one each in Norwegian, Polish and German. There were only three trials of acupuncture for acute low-back pain. They did not justify firm conclusions, because of small sample sizes and low methodological quality of the studies. For chronic low-back pain there is evidence of pain relief and functional improvement for acupuncture, compared to no treatment or sham therapy. These effects were only observed immediately after the end of the sessions and at short-term follow-up. There is evidence that acupuncture, added to other conventional therapies, relieves pain and improves function better than the conventional therapies alone. However, effects are only small. Dry-needling appears to be a useful adjunct to other therapies for chronic low-back pain. No clear recommendations could be made about the most effective acupuncture technique. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The data do not allow firm conclusions about the effectiveness of acupuncture for acute low-back pain. For chronic low-back pain, acupuncture is more effective for pain relief and functional improvement than no treatment or sham treatment immediately after treatment and in the short-term only. Acupuncture is not more effective than other conventional and "alternative" treatments. The data suggest that acupuncture and dry-needling may be useful adjuncts to other therapies for chronic low-back pain. Because most of the studies were of lower methodological quality, there certainly is a further need for higher quality trials in this area.

Acupuncture Therapy↗

Back pain following epidural anaesthesia in labour.

PURPOSE: To determine the factors associated with the development of post-partum back pain following epidural anaesthesia for labour and delivery and its incidence. METHODS: A prospective observational cohort study was conducted in a University affiliated tertiary care hospital. Women presenting for labour and delivery who were planning to have epidural anaesthesia were eligible for study. Baseline data were obtained from the women and obstetrical and anaesthetic data from the hospital chart. Women were contacted by phone at four to six weeks post-partum and questioned regarding the presence of any back pain and pain lasting longer than 14 days. RESULTS: Three hundred women entered the study and follow-up was obtained in 270 (90%). The incidence of back pain was 30.7% and back pain lasting longer than 14 days was 8.5%. Nulliparity was associated with a decreased risk of developing back pain post-partum but this decrease was only associated with pain lasting more than 14 days: Odds Ratio (OR) [95% confidence interval] 0.32 [0.11-0.94]. A previous history of back pain was strongly associated with the development of any back pain (OR 43.85 [9.97-192.9] but not with pain lasting longer than 14 days (OR 2.16 [0.71-6.58]). Age, weight and the duration of the second stage of labour were not associated with the development of back pain. CONCLUSIONS: Back pain following epidural anaesthesia is common but persistent back pain is much less common. A previous history of back pain increases the likelihood of post-partum back pain following epidural anaesthesia. Nulliparity is associated with a decreased risk.

Adult↗

Reduced risk of back pain following teriparatide treatment: a meta-analysis.

Vertebral fractures are the most common osteoporotic fracture and may result in back pain with functional limitations and diminished quality of life. Teriparatide [rhPTH (1-34)] has been shown to increase bone mass and reduce the risk of vertebral and other osteoporotic fractures. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of teriparatide on the risk of back pain in patients with osteoporosis. A systematic review of the literature was performed, and five trials were identified and included in our analyses. All trials were randomized, double-blinded, and parallel with either new vertebral fracture (n=1) or bone mineral density as the primary endpoint (n=4). Four studies were in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, and one was in men with idiopathic or hypogonadal osteoporosis. Two trials were placebo controlled, two trials were alendronate controlled, and one trial involved teriparatide plus hormone replacement therapy versus hormone replacement therapy alone. Reports of back pain, defined as new or worsened back pain after initiating the study drug, were obtained from adverse event databases, and the risk of back pain was analyzed using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model. Results were not statistically heterogeneous (P=0.60) across trials, and there were no differences between groups administered teriparatide 20 or 40 mcg/day doses (P=0.64). The rates of back pain, moderate or severe back pain, and severe back pain per 100 patient-years were numerically lower in the teriparatide versus comparator groups in each study. Compared with the pooled comparator, patients in the pooled teriparatide group had reduced risk for any back pain [relative risk, 0.66 (95% CI, 0.55-0.80)], moderate or severe back pain [relative risk, 0.60 (95% CI, 0.48-0.75)] and severe back pain [relative risk, 0.44 (95% CI, 0.28-0.68)]. Separate meta-analyses comparing teriparatide versus placebo or antiresorptive drugs gave similar results. In conclusion, patients randomized to teriparatide had a reduced risk of new or worsening back pain compared to patients randomized to placebo, hormone replacement therapy or alendronate.

Adult↗

[Chronic widespread pain and tender points in low back pain: a population-based study].

BACKGROUND: Clinical observation suggests a frequent coincidence of back pain (BP) and fibromyalgia (FMA). Based on data from a population survey on back pain we studied the hypothesis of FMA being a frequent underlying condition of BP. We additionally studied the association of the severity of back pain and both chronic widespread musculoskeletal pain and active tender points. PROBANDS AND METHODS: Data from a regional two-stage survey on urban German residents (aged 25-74 years) of Luebeck/Northern Germany (N=3969) were reanalyzed. The survey combined a postal questionnaire screening with a subsequent medical-psychological examination. Only subjects with back pain on the day of filling in the questionnaire were invited (n = 875). The response and participation rates were 82% and 73%, respectively. The severity of back pain was graded according to Kohlmann and Raspe (1994; based on pain severity and disability). In assessing widespread pain and tender points and classifying FMA-cases, we followed the criteria of the American College of Rheumatology (Wolfe et al. 1990). Standardized psychometric scales were used to measure general health status, bodily complaints, depressiveness, and catastrophizing cognitions. RESULTS: In Luebeck, the overall point prevalence of back pain reached 39%. Among those invited and examined we found 27%, 25%, and 19% with back pain grade 1, 2 or 3, respectively. 29% reported no back pain on the day of examination. 12.6% of probands with actual back pain reported chronic widespread pain. The number of active tender points showed a significant and relevant association with back pain grade and was additionally correlated with all indicators of somatic and psychological distress. CONCLUSION: Our data do not support the hypothesis of FMA as a frequent underlying condition of BP. We found, however, a close correlation between BP grade (and amount of distress) and tender points count. More severe forms of BP imply an increasing allodynia/hyperalgesia, itself being associated with a higher amount of somatic and psychological distress (Chronic severe) back pain seems to be more than simply pain in the back.

Adult↗

[What do we know about the symptoms of back pain? Epidemiological results on prevalence, incidence, progression and risk factors].

AIMS: This paper provides an overview of epidemiological findings concerning the prevalence and incidence of back pain, the underlying risk factors and health care utilization due to back pain. METHODS: Besides epidemiological studies, data from health care statistics and cost-of-illness studies were included in the systematic search. Relevant publications were identified using electronic literature databases (in particular Medline). RESULTS: Back-related disorders, classified according to the ICD-10 M40-M54 key are the major cause for receiving disability benefits. While back pain leads to a frequent demand for medical services, loss of production because of temporal sick leave is the major economic factor. In total, the estimated annual costs caused by back pain range between 16 and 22 billion euros. The life-time prevalence corresponds to the immense costs: 80 % report having ever experienced back pain. The point prevalence lies between 30 and 40 %. Approximately one-fourth to one-third of those affected suffer from clinically significant back pain. Recurrent as well as incident back pain is best predicted by prior back pain. The wide spectrum of other risk factors (depression, psychosocial distress, somatization, catastrophizing, dissatisfaction at work and sociodemographic as well as socioeconomic variables) underscores the multifaceted etiology of this symptom. CONCLUSION: Back pain belongs to the major individual and societal health problems in Germany. While extensive epidemiological evidence exists for the prevalence of back pain, its severity, course and associated risk factors, little systematic knowledge is available about the medical treatment of back pain.

Age Distribution↗

Acute severe low back pain. A population-based study of prevalence and care-seeking.

STUDY DESIGN: Telephone interviews were conducted with a random sample of adults in 4437 North Carolina households. The response rate was 79%. OBJECTIVE: The prevalence of low back pain and the correlates of care-seeking in a defined population were examined. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Previous research on low back pain has used varying definitions of the illness of low back pain, and has admixed patients with acute and chronic low back pain. Acute low back pain was examined in this study as a distinct phenomenon separate from chronic low back pain. METHODS: Respondents completed a detailed interview regarding the occurrence of and care sought for back pain in 1991. Acute back pain was defined as functionally limiting pain lasting less than 3 months. RESULTS: From this sample, 485 individuals had at least one occurrence of acute severe low back pain in 1991, representing 7.6% of the adult population. Symptoms were reported less commonly in individuals older than age 60 years (5% vs. 8.5%) and in nonwhites compared with whites (5% vs. 8.5%). Thirty-nine percent of those with back pain sought medical care; 24% sought care initially from an allopathic physician, 13% from a chiropractor, and 2% from other providers. More prolonged pain, more severe pain, and sciatica were associated with care-seeking. Gender, income, age, rural residence, and health insurance status did not correlate with the decision to seek medical care. Younger age, male gender, and nonjob-related pain did correlate with the decision to seek care from a chiropractor. CONCLUSIONS: Acute back pain is common. Care is often sought regardless of income and insurance status. Seeing a health care provider for acute back pain may not be discretionary from the perspective of the patient.

Acute Disease↗

Psychomotor speed and postural control in chronic low back pain patients A controlled follow-up study.

STUDY DESIGN: Psychomotor speed (reaction time) and postural control (center point of force velocity) among healthy control volunteers and patients with chronic low back pain (LBP) were studied at the beginning of an active, functional, restoration back rehabilitation program and 5 months after the program. OBJECTIVES: To study cross-sectionally reaction times and center points of force velocity among control volunteers and patients with low back pain, and to evaluate the effects of the restoration on these measures of motor function in a follow-up examination. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Deficits of motor skills and of coordination have been reported in association with musculoskeletal disorders, but one can only speculate about an association between proprioceptive dysfunction and low back disorders on the basis of the currently available data. METHODS: Sixty-one healthy control volunteers and 99 patients with low back pain-68 of these patients experienced moderate pain; 31 experienced severe pain-participated in the study. Reaction times for upper and lower limbs were tested with a system based on a microcomputer. Postural stability was measured with a vertical force platform. RESULTS: A consistent trend was found in which patients with low back pain had reaction times slower than these of control volunteers. Man with severe low back pain had significantly longer hand reaction times than men in the control group (P = 0.03). Women with severe low back pain also had poorer postural control than women with moderate low back pain (P = 0.02) and women in the control group (P = 0.04). Functional restoration seemed to have an effect on reaction times. The restoration was considered successful if the condition of a patient with a disability that had resulted from low back pain improved during the follow-up examination and unsuccessful if the disability worsened. Patients who experienced these results were identified in groups called "good" and "poor," respectively. Among men, the reaction times improved in the control group and "good" groups, but they became slower in the "poor" group. The difference between "good" and "poor" groups was significant (P = 0.008). Women in the "good" group achieved the most improved reaction times, and the difference between these women and the control women almost reached significance (P = 0.076). CONCLUSION: The results indicate that patients with chronic low back pain have impaired psychomotor speed and, among women, impaired postural control. Psychomotor speed improved during an active, functional, restoration back rehabilitation program.

Adult↗

Kinematic analysis of lumbar and hip motion while rising from a forward, flexed position in patients with and without a history of low back pain.

STUDY DESIGN: This study analyzed two groups of individuals during return to an upright position (extension) from a forward, bent position. Group 1 (n = 12) included individuals with no history of low back pain who were currently asymptomatic, and group 2 (n = 12) included individuals with no history of low back pain. OBJECTIVES: To determine the amount and pattern of lumbar spine and hip motion that occur as an individual rises from a forward, flexed position, to determine if differences exist in this measurement between individuals with and without a history of low back pain, and to determine if hamstring length is related to the pattern of motion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Reports of interaction between lumbar spine and hip movement vary for forward bending and extension. Differences may be a result of variations in measurement methods, loading conditions, or the pathology present, such as low back pain. METHODS: A three-dimensional optoelectric motion analysis system was used to measure the amount and velocity of lumbar spine and hip motion during extension. Each participant in the study performed three trials of a complete flexion-extension cycle at a self-selected speed. The data for the extension portion of the cycle were averaged and used for statistical analysis. Hamstring length also was determined using two clinical tests, the passive straight-leg raise and the active knee-extension tests. RESULTS: The pattern of movement was described by calculating lumbar to hip extension ratios for each 25% interval of total extension. Individuals with a history of low back pain tended to move from the lumbar spine earlier than those with no history of low back pain, especially in the initial 25% of the extension motion. For all participants, mean lumbar to hip extension ratios were 0.26 for 0-25% of extension, 0.61 for 25-50%, 0.81 for 50-75%, and 2.3 for 75-100%. The lumbar to hip ratios were different in each 25% interval, demonstrating that the hips had a greater contribution to early extension, with the lumbar spine contribution increasing in the middle intervals and becoming the primary source of motion in the final interval. When lumbar to hip extension ratios were compared with corresponding intervals of flexion, three of four were positively correlated to flexion ratios, demonstrating a reversible lumbopelvic rhythm. Although participants with a history of low back pain had significantly tighter hamstrings than participants with no history of low back pain, hamstring length was not correlated with any of the kinematic characteristics during extension. CONCLUSIONS: Participants who were currently asymptomatic but had a history of low back pain moved in a manner similar to that of participants with no history of low back pain except that they demonstrated greater lumbar motion and velocity during the initial phase of extension. This may have been the result of low back pain or a contributing factor in recurrent low back pain.

Adult↗

The importance of radiating leg pain in assessing health outcomes among patients with low back pain. Results from the Veterans Health Study.

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional data were analyzed from the Veterans Health Study, an observational study of patients receiving ambulatory care. OBJECTIVE: To develop a method of stratifying patients with low back pain by combining patient reports of radiating leg pain with the results of straight leg raising tests. SUMMARY AND BACKGROUND DATA: Four hundred thirty-four participants with low back pain were identified through patient reports of ever having had low back pain, of low back pain that began more than 3 months ago, and of a health-care visit for low back pain in the past year. Four hundred twenty-eight patients with low back pain were included in the current analysis. METHODS: Participants were mailed a health-related quality of life questionnaire and had an interview that included a low back pain questionnaire and a straight leg raising test. Patients' reports of radiating leg pain and results of the straight leg raising tests were combined into four hierarchical groups. This stratification was evaluated in relation to responses to the health-related quality of life questionnaire, localized low back pain, disability, and use of medical services. RESULTS: The intensity of localized low back pain and disability increased from Group 1 (low back pain alone) to Group 4 (pain below knee with positive straight leg raising test result), whereas health-related quality of life decreased. Group 4 patients were 5.1 times more likely than were Group 1 patients to use medications for low back pain (95% confidence interval 1.2, 22.9), 6.8 times more likely to have a spinal magnetic resonance study (95% confidence interval, 2.7, 17.2), and 3.9 times more likely to have surgery (95% confidence interval, 1.3, 11.4). CONCLUSIONS: The method of measuring correlation performs well in identifying patients with different levels of localized low back pain intensity, health-related quality of life, and use of services. It may be useful in studies of health outcomes, in clinical trials, and in predicting demands on health care resources.

Aged↗

Back pain in a large Canadian police force.

STUDY DESIGN: A survey of a random sample of 1002 members of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police to determine their experience with low back pain. OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of low back pain among Royal Canadian Mounted Police members and to assess the validity of the perception that the patrol car seat and the duty belt are causing a higher rate of low back pain among members of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police than in the general population. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Low back pain is a common problem throughout the industrialized world, with reported 1-year prevalence rates between 25% and 62%. Prevalence of low back pain among people who drive motor vehicles for a significant part of the day appears higher than in the general population. Among police officers, 1-year prevalence rates of between 44% and 62% have been reported. METHODS: A computerized database of 14,897 serving regular members was used to identify a sample of officers on active duty. A low back pain questionnaire was mailed to each selected member, eliciting information regarding their experience with low back pain, their exposure to known and putative risk factors, and their opinions about the contribution of these potential risk factors. The respondents to the questionnaire remained anonymous. RESULTS: The response rate was 80%. The prevalence of "chronic or recurring low back pain since joining the force" was 54.9%, which is comparable with the lifetime prevalence reported for the general population. Of those who reported having back problems, only 8.5% had such problems before joining the force. Seventy-six percent who had low back pain reported having a problem within the last year, giving an overall 1-year prevalence of 41.8%, which is comparable with that for the general population. The a priori assumption that driving or wearing a duty belt contributed to the problem was shared by most police officers surveyed. However, only about half of the members who replied drove for more than half the working day or wore the duty belt. These members had the same prevalence of low back pain as those who did not drive or wear the duty belt. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of low back pain in this police force is comparable with that in the general population, and driving a patrol car or wearing the duty belt does not appear to influence the prevalence rate in this population.

Adult↗

Low back pain and lifestyle. Part I: Smoking. Information from a population-based sample of 29,424 twins.

STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional postal survey of 29,424 people aged 12-41 years obtained from a population-generated panel of twin individuals. OBJECTIVES: To study whether smoking causes low back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Despite insufficient evidence in the epidemiologic literature, it has become increasingly accepted that smoking causes low back pain and that discontinuation of smoking is a suitable means of secondary prevention. METHODS: Dose-response was examined for smoking (daily use, number of years smoked, and total cigarette use during the years of smoking) in correlation with low back pain (occurring 1-7 days, 8-30 days, and > 30 days in the past year). A possible modifying effect was studied for age, gender, and body mass index. A negative gradient was sought in relation to the time since smoking was discontinued. The prevalence of low back pain was studied in monozygotic twin pairs, only one of whom smoked. RESULTS: There was a significant positive association between smoking and low back pain that increased with the duration of low back pain: occurring 1-7 days (odds ratio, 1.4), 8-30 days (odds ratio, 2.1), and more than 30 days (odds ratio, 3) in the past year. However, these differences in reports of low back pain disappeared in monozygotic twin pairs discordant on present smoke status. There was no biologic gradient for any of the low back pain definitions or measures of smoking-dose, and the prevalence of low back pain did not decrease with the number of years since smoking was stopped. Smaller people (youngsters, women, people with low body mass index) were not more vulnerable to development of low back pain with smoking. CONCLUSIONS: There is a definite link between smoking and low back pain that increases with the duration and frequency of the low back pain problem, but this link is unlikely to be causal.

Adolescent↗

Association between recovery outcomes for work-related low back disorders and personal, family, and work factors.

STUDY DESIGN: Incident cases of work-related low back disorders were identified in an automotive metal stamping plant. Individuals were asked to recall health and work habits at the time of diagnosis of the work-related disorder and to report their current low back pain and physical functioning. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate five measures of health outcomes for work-related low back disorders in an industrial population and to determine potentially modifiable correlates of recovery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The factors that influence recovery in actively working adults and how to best measure recovery outcome in this population are not well known. METHODS: Eighty-eight hourly employees of a metal stamping plant who experienced a work-related low back disorder were interviewed. Health status, health habits, and family and work relations were assessed with a structured interview to determine their association with various recovery outcomes (low back pain, low back pain disability, physical functioning, general physical health, and lost workdays). Interview information was supplemented with data from the plant's Occupational Safety and Health Administration Form 200 log. RESULTS: The clinical measures of recovery from the work-related low back disorders examined had similar overall predictive ability. However, in multivariate analyses, different potentially modifiable prognostic variables emerged as significant among them. Poorer self-rated health status and high personal stress were correlated with low back pain disability. Higher levels of cigarette smoking were correlated with higher levels of low back pain disability, lower physical functioning, and more severe low back pain at follow-up. CONCLUSION: The choice of measure of recovery from work-related low back disorders should be made in the context of the rehabilitation intervention goal. Interventions designed to modify and promote healthful personal behavior should be given more emphasis in rehabilitation efforts for work-related low back disorders.

Adult↗

Spine loading characteristics of patients with low back pain compared with asymptomatic individuals.

STUDY DESIGN: Patients with low back pain and asymptomatic individuals were evaluated while performing controlled and free-dynamic lifting tasks in a laboratory setting. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate how low back pain influences spine loading during lifting tasks. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: An important, yet unresolved, issue associated with low back pain is whether patients with low back pain experience spine loading that differs from that of individuals who are asymptomatic for low back pain. This is important to understand because excessive spine loading is suspected of accelerating disc degeneration in those whose spines are damaged already. METHODS: In this study, 22 patients with low back pain and 22 asymptomatic individuals performed controlled and free-dynamic exertions. Trunk muscle activity, trunk kinematics, and trunk kinetics were used to evaluate three- dimensional spine loading using an electromyography- assisted model in conjunction with a new electromyographic calibration procedure. RESULTS: Patients with low back pain experienced 26% greater spine compression and 75% greater lateral shear (normalized to moment) than the asymptomatic group during the controlled exertions. The increased spine loading resulted from muscle coactivation. When permitted to move freely, the patients with low back pain compensated kinematically in an attempt to minimize external moment exposure. Increased muscle coactivation and greater body mass resulted in significantly increased absolute spine loading for the patients with low back pain, especially when lifting from low vertical heights. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest a significant mechanical spine loading cost is associated with low back pain resulting from trunk muscle coactivation. This loading is further exacerbated by the increases in body weight that often accompany low back pain. Patient weight control and proper workplace design can minimize the additional spine loading associated with low back pain.

Adult↗

Can health care utilization explain the association between socioeconomic status and back pain?

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional population-based study. OBJECTIVES: To assess whether the association between socioeconomic status and severe back pain can be explained by the preceding health care utilization for back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The ways in which socioeconomic status affects the occurrence of back pain are unclear. METHODS: Age- and gender-adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals for the association between indicators of socioeconomic status and severe current back pain (high intensity and/or high disability: no/yes) were investigated in an interview among 770 study participants out of 1113 study participants with a recent history of back pain in a survey among 2731 adults. RESULTS: The point prevalence of severe current back pain (39.8%) was related to educational level and health insurance status. Prior health care utilization for back pain was about 2-fold more prevalent in adults with severe current back pain. Members of private health insurance (odds ratio 0.60, 95% confidence interval 0.37-0.99) were less likely to report prior consultation of a general practitioner for back pain. Members of sick funds for white-collar workers (odds ratio 2.81, 95% confidence interval 1.43-5.51) and private insurance (odds ratio 2.81, 95% confidence interval 1.02-6.24) and individuals with intermediate educational level (odds ratio 1.76, 95% confidence interval 1.05-2.95) utilized more physical therapy for the treatment of back pain. After additionally adjusting for health care utilization, the associations between educational level or health insurance status and severe current back pain remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that education, health insurance status, and health care utilization are independently associated with severe current back pain in a society with universal access to health care.

Adult↗

Postoperative change of the cross-sectional area of back musculature after 5 surgical procedures as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging.

Many investigators have reported that persistent low back pain may occur after posterior surgical intervention, and studies have investigated the histologic and histochemical changes in back muscle after posterior lumbar spine surgery. The purpose of the current study is to compare the pre- and postoperative cross-sectional area of the back musculature among 5 surgical groups including anterior lumbar interbody fusion, which has no direct invasion of the back musculature, using magnetic resonance imaging, and to correlate the clinical results with the degree of atrophy. The cross-sectional area of the back musculature was measured before and after surgery in T2-weighted axial magnetic resonance images using a computer-linked digitizer. The degree of atrophy (atrophy ratio) was calculated as a ratio of the postoperative cross-sectional area to the preoperative cross-sectional area. Clinical results were evaluated using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association's scores for the management of low back pain. Atrophy of the back musculature was confirmed in each group. However, no significant difference was seen in the atrophy ratio between the groups. Back musculature atrophy occurred even in anterior lumbar interbody fusion, which does not involve any direct surgery of the back muscle. A positive correlation was noted between the atrophy ratio and operation time only in posterior surgery, especially in nonfusion surgery. In conclusion, the current study suggests that a shorter operation time may minimize back muscle injury, and shows that factors inducing back musculature atrophy include not only direct invasion of the back muscle via a posterior approach, but also postoperative external fixation.

Adult↗

On the course of low back pain in general practice: a one year follow up study.

OBJECTIVES: Knowledge on the clinical course of low back pain presented in general practice is poor. Preceding studies offer a fragmentary view only, whereas further knowledge is important to enable the assessment of the prognosis. The object of this study is to investigate the course of low back pain presented in general practice to enable the assessment of the prognosis. METHODS: A one year follow up study on the clinical course of low back pain in consecutive cases receiving usual care in general practice. During a period of two years 15 general practitioners from Amsterdam and surrounding areas included consecutive patients with both chronic and recent onset low back pain. After the initial visit, each patient was monitored for a period of 12 months. The follow up consisted of monthly postal questionnaires on the course of the low back pain and the related disability. RESULTS: A total of 443 of 605 patients identified were included in the follow up, which was fully completed by 269 patients. In general, patients with less serious low back pain participated less often or did not complete the follow up. At 12 weeks 35% and at the end of the follow up 10% of the population, respectively, still suffered from low back pain. Both the pain and the disability seemed to diminish quickly after the initial visit, and both seemed to stabilise at a lower level if the low back pain did not disappear completely. About three of four patients, whose pain disappeared before the end of the follow up, endured one or more relapses within a year. The median time to a relapse was about seven weeks, and its median duration about six weeks. Both the pain and the disability turned out to be less severe during relapses. The median time to recovery for patients whose low back pain developed more than seven weeks before the initial visit, was four weeks longer than for patients with more recently developed low back pain at the initial visit. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical course of low back pain presented in general practice, for the most patients, clearly is less favourable than expected. It takes more than just a few weeks to recover, and relapses occur within a year in most cases. Fortunately, both the pain and the disability quickly diminish, even if the low back pain does not resolve within a few weeks.

Acute Disease↗

Population based intervention to change back pain beliefs and disability: three part evaluation.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of a population based, state-wide public health intervention designed to alter beliefs about back pain, influence medical management, and reduce disability and costs of compensation. DESIGN: Quasi-experimental, non-randomised, non-equivalent, before and after telephone surveys of the general population and postal surveys of general practitioners with an adjacent state as control group and descriptive analysis of claims database. SETTING: Two states in Australia. PARTICIPANTS: 4730 members of general population before and two and two and a half years after campaign started, in a ratio of 2:1:1; 2556 general practitioners before and two years after campaign onset. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Back beliefs questionnaire, knowledge and attitude statements about back pain, incidence of workers' financial compensation claims for back problems, rate of days compensated, and medical payments for claims related to back pain and other claims. RESULTS: In the intervention state beliefs about back pain became more positive between successive surveys (mean improvement in questionnaire score 1.9 (95% confidence interval 1.3 to 2.5), P<0.001 and 3.2 (2.6 to 3.9), P<0.001, between baseline and the second and third survey, respectively). Beliefs about back pain also improved among doctors. There was a clear decline in number of claims for back pain, rates of days compensated, and medical payments for claims for back pain over the duration of the campaign. CONCLUSIONS: A population based strategy of provision of positive messages about back pain improves population and general practitioner beliefs about back pain and seems to influence medical management and reduce disability and workers' compensation costs related to back pain.

Adult↗

Back pain in former intercollegiate rowers. A long-term follow-up study.

BACKGROUND: Research has shown that 32% of intercollegiate rowers develop back pain during their college career. HYPOTHESIS: Rowers who develop back pain in college are more likely than the general population to have back pain later in life. STUDY DESIGN: Survey. METHODS: Surveys from 1561 former intercollegiate rowing athletes were analyzed. Subjects who completed the surveys had graduated from college at a mean and median of 13 years previously, with a range of 0 to 20 years between graduation and completion of the survey. The survey was designed to determine the presence of back pain and its severity before, during, and after intercollegiate rowing. Back pain was defined as pain that lasted at least 1 week. RESULTS: Age was a significant predictor of back pain after college. Nevertheless, the lifetime prevalence of back pain in former intercollegiate rowers was no different from that of the general population (51.4% versus 60% to 80%). However, rowers who developed back pain in college had more subsequent back pain than rowers who were asymptomatic in college (78.9% versus 37.9%). Rowers who were asymptomatic in college had significantly lower rates of back pain as they aged than did the general population. The mean severity of current back pain was 3.5 +/- 1.9 on a scale of 1 to 10. CONCLUSIONS: Intercollegiate rowers are no more likely than the general population to have back pain later in life.

Adult↗