Raloxifene, retinoids, and lavender: "me too" tamoxifen alternatives under study.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · Search PubMed
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Antiestrogens antagonize many genomic effects of estrogen through binding to the nuclear estrogen receptor. We report here that NIH3T3 fibroblasts grown in the presence of colchicine acquire the activation of a large conductance chloride channel upon exposure to extracellular but not intracellular antiestrogens. This effect can be prevented by extracellular 17 beta-estradiol, but not intracellular 17 beta-estradiol or extracellular 17 alpha-estradiol. This is the first demonstration of a regulatory role for antiestrogens and estrogens in the regulation of ionic channels occurring through an interaction of these compounds with a plasma membrane binding site distinct from the classical estrogen receptor and subsequent activation of intracellular second messenger pathway (or pathways).
Hormonal agents have a confirmed role in the management of postmenopausal women with receptor-positive advanced breast cancer. Until recently, tamoxifen has been the accepted agent for treating these patients. However, accumulating evidence suggests that the new antiaromatase agents will replace the antiestrogens as the preferable option in hormone-naive patients. Comparative trials indicate that the aromatase inhibitors, anastrozole and letrozole, and the aromatase inactivator, exemestane, have at least equivalent efficacy to tamoxifen with similar or superior tolerability. These agents are also more effective than the progestin, megestrol acetate, when studied in patients progressing on tamoxifen. The improved aromatase selectivity and high potency of these antiaromatase agents when compared with earlier agents have resulted in improved efficacy and tolerability. Additionally, no cross-resistance has been reported between the antiaromatase agents and tamoxifen or, in some instances, among the antiaromatase agents themselves. The role of antiaromatase agents will certainly expand in the near future to include not only treatment of metastatic breast cancer, but use in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings as well, and, ultimately, breast cancer prevention. The results of ongoing investigations are awaited with interest.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
We describe a microarray experiment using the MCF-7 breast cancer cell line in two different experimental conditions for which the same number of independent pools as the number of individual samples was hybridized on Affymetrix GeneChips. Unexpectedly, when using individual samples, the number of probe sets found to be differentially expressed between treated and untreated cells was about three times greater than that found using pools. These findings indicate that pooling samples in microarray experiments where the biological variability is expected to be small might not be helpful and could even decrease one's ability to identify differentially expressed genes.
PURPOSE: Based on the data and clinical experience derived from tamoxifen usage, the properties of an ideal antiestrogen is described that could have applications as a breast cancer preventative agent, long-term adjuvant therdpy, or as a treatment for osteoporosis. Each of the new antiestrogens currently being tested is discussed in terms of laboratory development, toxicology, pharmacology, endocrinology, and clinical evaluation. And each new compound is assessed according to the properties of an ideal antiestrogen. METHODS: A review of all published reports was facilitated by the use of Medline computer searches. RESULTS: Numerous compounds are being evaluated in clinical trials and can be categorized as triphenylethylenes or tamoxifen analogs, pure antiestrogens, and targeted antiestrogens. Several of these compounds may have fewer uterotropic properties and greater effects on maintaining bone density compared with tamoxifen; however, the clinical experience (ie, patient-years of treatment) with any of these compounds is minimal. CONCLUSION: Although many of these compounds appear promising, further evaluation will be necessary to determine the role these compounds may serve as preventive agents, adjuvant therapies, treatments for advanced disease, or other medical indications such as osteoporosis.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
PURPOSE: Bexarotene is a retinoid X receptor-selective retinoid that has preclinical antitumor activity in breast cancer. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of oral bexarotene in the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The following three groups of patients were treated: hormone-refractory, chemotherapy-refractory, and tamoxifen-resistant patients. Patients in the first two groups were treated with bexarotene alone, whereas the tamoxifen-resistant patients received both tamoxifen and bexarotene. Patients in all groups were randomly assigned to receive bexarotene at either 200 or 500 mg/m(2)/d. RESULTS: One hundred forty-eight patients were randomized; 145 patients were treated. Of 48 hormone-refractory patients, there were two partial responses (6%) and 10 patients with stable disease lasting more than 6 months; of 47 chemotherapy-refractory patients, there were two partial responses (6%) and five patients with stable disease; and of 51 tamoxifen-resistant patients, there was one partial response (3%) and 11 patients with stable disease. All partial responses occurred at the 200-mg/m(2)/d dose. The projected median time to progression across all of the arms was 8 to 10 weeks. There were no drug-related deaths, and only two patients had drug-related serious adverse events. The most common drug-related adverse events were hypertriglyceridemia (84%), dry skin (34%), asthenia (30%), and headache (27%). There were no cases of pancreatitis. CONCLUSION: The efficacy of bexarotene in patients with refractory metastatic breast cancer is limited. However, it is an oral agent with minimal toxicity and a unique mechanism of action, which produced clinical benefit in approximately 20% of patients. Future efforts should define populations likely to benefit from this agent.
Hormone receptors and, specifically, estrogen receptors were described about four decades ago. For estrogens, there are two receptors, estrogen receptor alpha (ERalpha) and estrogen receptor beta (ERbeta). The two receptors are coded by different genes and their tissue expression varies across organs. ERalpha is predominantly expressed in reproductive tissues (uterus, breast, ovaries) liver and central nervous system, whereas ERbeta is expressed in other tissues such as bone, endothelium, lungs, urogenital tract, ovaries, central nervous system and prostate. More than seventy molecules that belong to the SERMS class have been described. There are 5 chemical groups: triphenylethylenes, benzotiophenes, tetrahydronaphtylenes, indoles and benzopyrans. All of these non-hormonal compounds are capable of activating the ER, reduce bone turnover rate and, as an antiresorptive, clearly improve bone density. Estrogens reduce bone turnover rate and, as an antiresorptive, clearly improve bone density. They are also beneficial for the relief of menopausal symptoms. An ongoing debate that extends over the decades, relates to to overall benefit/risk profile of estrogen or estrogen-progestin therapy since these therapies can increase the risk of serious health disorders, such as breast cancer. SERMs have increased our understanding of hormone-receptor regulatory mechanisms. Their development has permitted a targeted efficacy profile avoiding some of the side effects of the hormone therapy. Their clinical utility relies today mostly on the effects on breast cancer and bone.
Antiestrogens block by definition specifically the actions of estrogens. In the classical uterotropic assay in immature rodents, where estrogens cause fluid retention and cell proliferation, triphenylethylenes have also species-specific estrogen-like (agonistic) effects. 4-hydroxylated triphenylethylenes have in general less estrogenic properties than unhydroxylated ones, and ICI 164,384 has no estrogenic activity in this model. Uterus responds to estrogens by stimulation of cell proliferation. Some other tissues, like breast, liver, and bone respond by regulation of specific protein synthesis. Some of the proteins act as growth factors, and some have unknown functions. The regulation of gene expression is a complex phenomenon: estrogens may turn the responsive gene on or off. Similarly antiestrogens may participate in the gene regulation by mimicking or antagonising estrogen-like actions. This paper summarizes the estrogenic and antiestrogenic effects of classical and new antiestrogens in different tissues.
This article provides an overview of the historical development, current research, clinical benefits, and potential future applications of the selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), tamoxifen and raloxifene. The understanding of the mechanism of action of SERMs led not only to the development of tamoxifen, the first widely used antiestrogen for breast cancer treatment, but also to its application as a chemopreventive agent. The SERM principle of antiestrogenic actions in the breast but estrogenlike actions in bone is reviewed in clinical practice through analysis of the current applications and the potential for expanding the role of SERMs. The current view of the molecular mechanism of SERM action is summarized to identify potential target sites for future research. The clinical success of tamoxifen and raloxifene for the prevention and treatment of breast cancer and osteoporosis, respectively, has encouraged the development of a range of new agents that target breast cancer, osteoporosis, coronary heart disease, and endometrial safety.
Fourteen cases with symptomatic ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) were treated with breast-conservation treatment intensified with endocrine therapy. Nine of 14 patients with palpable mass had tumor detected on mammography. CT, ultrasonography, and MRI were able to detect linear and/or spotty lesion or enhancement suggesting DCIS. Whereas these findings were not particular to DCIS, the combination of these modalities would be useful in deciding the extent of resection for DCIS. There was no patient selection for breast-conservation treatment in our department. All patients received tangential and boost radiation, and were treated with endocrine therapy using anti-estrogen drugs. The reason that nine cases had close margins (<5 mm) might be on account of the treatment including lumpectomy with 1 cm of surgical margin. In spite of their margin status, no local or systemic failure was experienced, and the cosmetic results of most patients were rated as excellent or good. Therefore, our breast-conservation treatment intensified with systemic therapy is thought to be adequate for patients with symptomatic DCIS. Six of eight cases who received preoperative treatment containing endocrine therapy with or without CAF chemotherapy showed a decrease in tumor size. Preoperative treatment may effect the microinvasion and/or breast tissue surrounding a DCIS tumor.
The role of estrogens, including its sources, tissue distribution, metabolism, and mechanism of action, is discussed in this review. The ER alpha and beta are functioning separately, and there is a physiological balance between their activity. Whenever this balance is over thrown due to endogenous or exogenous carcinogenic factors, malignancy develops. Risk factors of breast cancer are listed and evaluated individually. It should be stressed however, that their carcinogenic effect sums up. The knowledge of established risk factors rises the possibility of chemoprevention, which might be highly desirable in case of gene carriers. Special emphasis is attached to the SERM molecules which act as antiestrogens. Their antitumour effect is largely used in the treatment of hormone sensitive advanced breast cancer patients, and their efficacy has been proved in adjuvant therapy as well. Their preventive use might also be justified, especially in gene carriers. Aromatase inhibitors form a special class among the SERM molecules. In Hungary, anastrozole, letrozole and exemestane are widely applied for the therapy of breast cancer patients, while raloxifene has only been introduced recently, mainly in order to prevent osteoporosis. The therapeutic value of fulvestrant is unknown yet and its antitumour effect has to be explored. The therapeutic significance of these molecules lies in the fact that they might be effective after the development of tamoxifen resistance. There are several explanations for this phenomenon offering new targets for the further development of a succesful antitumour chemotherapy.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Endocrine therapy of advanced or recurrent breast cancer was described. The presence of ER or PgR in primary breast tumors is the best-established marker for response to endocrine therapy. However, ER-positive breast tumors overexpressing EGF-R and/or HER-2 (Erb B2) are resistant to endocrine therapy. Recently it was suggested that an elevated level of the circulating extracellular domain of HER-2 could be a predictor for poor response to endocrine therapy. LH-RH agonist is used as a first-line therapy for premenopausal patients. And LH-RH agonist plus tamoxifen (TAM) has shown a higher response rate and more prolonged survival than LH-RH agonist or TAM alone. As two new aromatase inhibitors, anastrozole (ANA) and letrozole, have shown an equal or higher response rate and a prolonged time to progression than TAM as a first-line therapy, these could be used as a first-line therapy instead of TAM. In a cross-over trial of ANA and TAM, the response rate of ANA after TAM failure was equal to that of TAM after ANA failure. As these drugs showed an equal or higher response rate and longer survival than progestin in TAM resistant cases, these drugs could also used as a second-line therapy. In addition, the trend of recent studies regarding the mechanisms of hormone resistance is also described.
The aim of this work was to evaluate the postoperative serum markers of type I collagen synthesis (PINP,PICP) and degradation (ICTP) and their possible potential for predicting the spread of disease and survival. 373 node-positive breast cancer patients were enrolled. 120 patients (32%) developed recurrent disease in the follow-up. The mean time to recurrence was 17 months and the mean follow-up time was 45 months. The mean level of PINP was significantly elevated in the patients who developed metastatic disease in the follow-up as compared with those without metastases. PINP was statistically significantly higher in all the patients who developed bone metastases than in those without metastases. When patients with only bone metastases or patients with bone and soft tissue and/or visceral metastases and patients with only visceral or soft tissue metastases were compared with those not exhibiting metastases, PINP was significantly higher in the group with recurrence in the bone, but there were no significant differences in serum PINP, PICP or ICTP values between the patients with only bone metastases and those who developed soft or visceral metastases during the follow-up. Postoperative high PINP was also a factor for poorer survivaL Tumor size, malignancy grade and progesterone receptors were shown in multivariate analysis to be predictors of recurrence and tumor size and PINP and progesterone receptors to be predictors of survivaL
Antiestrogens are compounds that inhibit estrogen action by competing for its receptors. Estrogens are involved in the proliferation and differentiation of target cells and are among the main risk factors for breast and uterine cancer. Some antiestrogens, such as Tamoxifen, are used as adjuvant therapy against breast cancer, and have been proposed to be included in prevention programs for women at high risk of cancer. Antiestrogens are classified according to their action mechanisms into Type I or partial (agonistic/antagonistic), and Type II or pure (pure antagonistic). Advancements in the development of new antiestrogens and their clinical importance are reviewed in this paper, as well as their mechanism of action and clinical applications.