Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “THORACOSCOPY”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 487 records · Page 27Linked to original sources
PubMed1964

[THORACOSCOPY].

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Humans↗
PubMed1995

Thoracoscopy vs conventional autopsy of the thorax. A promising perspective.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the sensitivity and specificity of thoracoscopic autopsy compared with that of conventional postmortem examination. DESIGN: Consecutive sampling, case-series study. SETTING: A general community referral center and the local Institute of Forensic Medicine. PARTICIPANTS: A consecutive sample of 20 fresh cadavers (less than 24 hours old), victims of motor vehicle crashes, gunshot wounds, in-hospital deaths. INTERVENTIONS: Introduction of the thoracoscope through the fourth or fifth intercostal space, anterior or midaxillary line. The pleural cavity and mediastinum were examined. Formal postmortem examination was then performed, and the findings of both procedures were recorded, compared, and analyzed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prior to the beginning of the study, it was hypothesized that thoracoscopic autopsy would reach an overall sensitivity and specificity of at least 85% and enable accurate inspection of the thoracic cavity and mediastinum in search of trauma-related abnormalities in trauma victims or cause of death in in-hospital patients. RESULTS: There was an 85% correlation of both procedures in all cases. The sensitivity of thoracoscopic autopsy was 87% and overall specificity reached 72%. CONCLUSIONS: Thoracoscopic autopsy is accurate and easy to perform. It is highly sensitive, especially in deaths due to trauma and following thoracic surgery. Thoracoscopic autopsy is an important tool that allows the diagnosis of major chest abnormalities as well as ruling out postoperative catastrophe, information that is invaluable for the surgeon, as well as all the medical staff and families. Thoracoscopic postmortem examination should be offered to mourning families as a cosmetic and reliable option when informed consent for conventional autopsy is lacking.

Autopsy↗
PubMed1998

Cost analysis for thoracoscopy: thoracoscopic wedge resection and lobectomy.

We reviewed our experience with video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) in our most recent 80 patients for the purpose of cost analysis. The costs incurred in the patients undergoing a VATS wedge resection for nodules (n = 30) and a VATS lobectomy for lung cancer (n = 10) were compared with the costs in similar patients undergoing a wedge resection (n = 20) and lobectomy (n = 20) using open techniques. The disposable instrument costs were US $1071 higher for a VATS wedge resection; however, the operative time was shorter (0.99 h for VATS versus 1.75 h for the open procedure). The length of hospital stay was also shorter after a VATS wedge resection (10.4 days for VATS versus 16.8 days for the open procedure), thus resulting in lower total hospital charge in the VATS group. The disposable instrument costs were $3190 higher for a VATS lobectomy, and the operative time was longer (5.56 h for VATS versus 4.25 h for the open procedure). The length of hospital stay was similar in both groups (25.2 days for VATS versus 27.7 days for the open procedure), thus resulting in a higher total hospital charge in the VATS lobectomy group. The cost of a VATS wedge resection for removing peripheral nodules is competitive with that of open techniques, but the cost of a VATS lobectomy is higher than that for an open lobectomy.

Costs and Cost Analysis↗