Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Systematic Reviews as Topic”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 487 records · Page 27Linked to original sources
PubMed2000

Anti-epileptic drugs for preventing seizures following acute traumatic brain injury.

BACKGROUND: Seizure activity in the early post-traumatic period following head injury may cause secondary brain damage as a result of increased metabolic demands, raised intracranial pressure and excess neurotransmitter release. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects of prophylactic anti-epileptic agents for acute traumatic head injury. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Injuries Group trials register, Medline and the databases of the Cochrane Stroke Group and Cochrane Epilepsy Group. We also contacted pharmaceutical companies who manufacture anti-epileptic agents, the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Epilepsy Division, and the National Institute of Health, United States. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised trials of anti-epileptic agents, in which study participants had a clinically defined acute traumatic head injury of any severity. Trials in which the intervention was started more than eight weeks after injury were excluded. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the quality of the trials. Relative risks and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for each trial on an intention to treat basis, which included pre-drug loading exclusions. As long as statistical heterogeneity did not exist, for dichotomous data, summary relative risks and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using a fixed effects model. Where the source of heterogeneity could obviously be related to allocation concealment, drug type, or drug dose, we stratified the analyses on that dimension. MAIN RESULTS: We identified 10 eligible randomised controlled trials, including 2036 participants. Data are currently unavailable for four unpublished trials, representing 631 participants. For the remaining trials, the pooled relative risk (RR) for early seizure prevention was 0.34 (95% confidence interval 0.21 to 0.54); based on this estimate, for every 100 patients treated, 10 would be kept seizure free in the first week. Seizure control in the acute phase was not accompanied by a reduction in mortality (RR=1.15; 95% confidence interval 0.89 to 1. 51), a reduction in death and neurological disability (RR = 1.49; 95% confidence interval 1.06 to 2.08 for carbamazepine and RR= 0.96; 95% confidence interval 0.72 to 1.26 for phenytoin) or a reduction in late seizures (pooled RR =1.28; 95% confidence interval 0.90 to 1. 81). The pooled relative risk for skin rashes was 1.57 (95% confidence interval 0.57 to 39.88). REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic anti-epileptics are effective in reducing early seizures, but there is no evidence that treatment with prophylactic anti-epileptics reduces the occurrence of late seizures, or has any effect on death and neurological disability. Insufficient evidence is available to establish the net benefit of prophylactic treatment at any time after injury.

Anticonvulsants↗
PubMed2005

EDTA chelation therapy for cardiovascular disease: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Numerous practitioners of both conventional and complementary and alternative medicine throughout North America and Europe claim that chelation therapy with EDTA is an effective means to both control and treat cardiovascular disease. These claims are controversial, and several randomized controlled trials have been completed dealing with this topic. To address this issue we conducted a systematic review to evaluate the best available evidence for the use of EDTA chelation therapy in the treatment of cardiovascular disease. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of 7 databases from inception to May 2005. Hand searches were conducted in review articles and in any of the trials found. Experts in the field were contacted and registries of clinical trials were searched for unpublished data. To be included in the final systematic review, the studies had to be randomized controlled clinical trials. RESULTS: A total of seven articles were found assessing EDTA chelation for the treatment of cardiovascular disease. Two of these articles were subgroup analyses of one RCT that looked at different clinical outcomes. Of the remaining five studies, two smaller studies found a beneficial effect whereas the other three exhibited no benefit for cardiovascular disease from the use of EDTA chelation therapy. Adverse effects were rare but those of note included a few cases of hypocalcemia and a single case of increased creatinine in a patient on the EDTA intervention. CONCLUSION: The best available evidence does not support the therapeutic use of EDTA chelation therapy in the treatment of cardiovascular disease. Although not considered to be a highly invasive or harmful therapy, it is possible that the use of EDTA chelation therapy in lieu of proven therapy may result in causing indirect harm to the patient.

Cardiovascular Diseases↗
PubMed2005

Customised fetal growth chart: a systematic review.

Customised fetal growth chart is used to individualise fetal weight for gestational age by adjusting for physiological variables known to affect birth weight and growth. Compared with the standard population-based growth chart, the customised growth chart allows for better distinction between normal and abnormal smallness and reduces the false positive and false negative diagnosis of fetal growth restriction. The charts are currently being introduced into clinical practice in the West Midlands as well as in several units around the country. A Medline and systematic review search from 1980 to 2004 was performed in order to collect information and evidence on the use of customised growth chart and its effect on perinatal outcome.

Female↗
PubMed2004

[Primary prevention for alcohol misuse in young people: a Cochrane Systematic Review].

The Cochrane Collaboration is an international no-profit organization established in 1992 in UK. The aim of the Collaboration is the conduction, update and dissemination of systematic reviews about health care. Systematic reviews are electronic documents systematically updated which synthesise the results of randomized controlled studies about treatments. The Cochrane Group on Drugs and Alcohol has the editorial base in Rome (Department of Epidemiology ASL RME) where the Coordinator, the Coordinating Editor and the Trial Search Coordinator, coordinate the work of seven editors based in several countries. As of April 2003 we published 17 reviews and 11 protocols of review. The systematic reviews on primary prevention for alcohol misuse in young people, was conducted by David Foxcroft and published by the group in 2002. The objectives of the systematic review were the identification and synthesis of the studies on psychosocial and educational programs for prevention of alcohol abuse and the assessment of long term interventions (over three years).

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Anxiolytics and antidepressants for smoking cessation.

BACKGROUND: There are two reasons to believe antidepressants and anxiolytics might help in smoking. First, anxiety and depression are symptoms of nicotine withdrawal, and smoking cessation sometimes precipitates depression. Second, smoking appears to be due, in part, to deficits in dopamine, serotonin and norepinephrine, all of which are increased by anxiolytics and antidepressants. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this review is to assess the effectiveness of such drugs in aiding long term smoking cessation. The drugs include bupropion; buspirone; diazepam; doxepin; fluoxetine; imipramine; meprobamate; moclobemide; nortriptyline; tryptophan; ondansetron; venlafaxine and the beta-blockers metoprolol, oxprenolol and propanolol. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Group trials register which includes trials indexed in Medline, Embase, SciSearch and PsycLit, and meetings abstracts. SELECTION CRITERIA: We considered randomized trials comparing anxiolytic or antidepressant drugs to placebo or an alternative therapeutic control for smoking cessation. We excluded trials with less than 6 months follow-up. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We extracted data in duplicate on the type of study population, the nature of the drug therapy, the outcome measures, method of randomisation, and completeness of follow-up. The main outcome measure was abstinence from smoking after at least six months follow-up in patients smoking at baseline. We used the most rigorous definition of abstinence for each trial, and biochemically validated rates if available. Where appropriate, we performed meta-analysis using a fixed effects model. MAIN RESULTS: There was one trial each of the anxiolytics diazepam, meprobamate, metoprolol and oxprenolol. There were two trials of the anxiolytic buspirone. None of these showed evidence of effectiveness in helping smokers to quit. There was one trial each of the antidepressants fluoxetine and moclobemide, two of nortriptyline, and four trials of bupropion. Nortriptyline and bupropion increased cessation and other antidepressants might also be effective. One trial found combined bupropion and nicotine patch produced higher quit rates than patch alone. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: There is little evidence that anxiolytics aid smoking cessation. Some antidepressants (bupropion and nortriptyline) can aid smoking cessation. It is not clear whether these effects are specific for individual drugs, or a class effect.

Anti-Anxiety Agents↗
PubMed2003

[Special comments--problems in systematic review for diagnostic accuracy of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein assay in neonatal infection].

We conducted a systematic review for the diagnostic accuracy of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein assay for neonatal infection. In total, 558 relevant published reports were found in a search of MEDLINE and Igaku-Chuo-Shi. With our inclusion and exclusion criteria, we finally selected 30 primary studies for meta-analysis. We critically appraised the quality of selected clinical studies and then extracted sensitivity and specificity data from each article for meta-analysis. There was only one article that fulfilled our three major standards for quality assessment(rank A; high-quality), while 19 studies which fulfilled only one criterion were assigned to rank C(low-quality). Most studies neither took careful consideration of the blindness against the results of the index test nor described this methodological standard. Lack of qualified primary studies may have had substantial influence on the summary estimates. Insufficient number of primary studies for meta-analysis and their unsatisfactory quality would be improved by the addition of supplemental results retrieved from raw data, which the authors of clinical studies did not present in their articles.

Humans↗
PubMed2000

[Evidence-based laboratory medicine--a new trend in laboratory medicine].

The most important target of "evidence-based laboratory medicine(EBLM)", based on the fundamental concept of evidence-based medicine(EBM) is to improve appropriate, effective utilization of laboratory tests through close communication between clinical laboratories and clinicians. It is mandatory for clinicians to know of analytical uncertainty for better utilization of laboratory tests in clinical practice. Furthermore, the improvement of clinical utilization and interpretation of laboratory tests can be expected by supplying the evidences obtained through systematic reviewing or meta-analysis of laboratory tests. In order to pursue these purposes, closer communication and cooperation between laboratories and clinicians are important to obtain an effective consensus. Clinical laboratory must work together with interested clinician(s) for systematic review of laboratory tests. Construction of the ways of better laboratory-clinician communication should be an important paradigm for EBLM which will be an important factor for new revolution of laboratory medicine in future.

Clinical Laboratory Techniques↗
PubMed2002

Artemether-lumefantrine for treating uncomplicated falciparum malaria.

BACKGROUND: Artemether-lumefantrine is being promoted by the World Health Organization for treating uncomplicated malaria. It is expensive. We sought evidence of its superiority over existing treatment regimens. OBJECTIVES: To compare artemether-lumefantrine with other antimalarial drugs for treating uncomplicated falciparum malaria. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group specialized trials register (April 2002), the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (Issue 2, 2002), MEDLINE (1966 to April 2002), EMBASE (1988 to April 2002), conference proceedings, and reference lists of articles. We contacted experts in malaria research and the pharmaceutical company that manufactures artemether-lumefantrine. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized and quasi-randomized trials comparing artemether-lumefantrine administered orally with standard treatment regimens (single drug or combination). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently applied inclusion criteria to potentially relevant trials, assessed trial quality, and extracted data. Parasitaemia on day 28 (day 42 for sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine and day 63 for mefloquine) was the primary outcome. Adverse event information was collected from the studies. MAIN RESULTS: Eight trials (2117 participants) met the inclusion criteria. In the four studies against single agents, failure rates for artemether-lumefantrine tended to be higher in comparisons against sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, halofantrine, and mefloquine. This difference was statistically significant for mefloquine. When compared with chloroquine, artemether-lumefantrine was better in two studies, but the failure rate for chloroquine at these sites was over 50%. All single agent studies used four doses of artemether-lumefantrine. In comparisons against combination treatment, three trials tested artemether-lumefantrine against mefloquine-artesunate and showed that artemether-lumefantrine was inferior for day 28 cure (Relative Risk 6.33, 95% confidence interval 3.08 to 13.01). If this comparison is confined to the two trials where participants received six doses, artemether-lumefantrine was associated with higher cure rates, but this was not statistically significant (Relative Risk 4.20, 95% confidence interval 0.55 to 31.93). REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Artemether-lumefantrine is more effective than chloroquine in chloroquine resistant areas. Artemether-lumefantrine is less effective than mefloquine or mefloquine combined with artesunate. We found no evidence to confirm or refute whether artemether-lumefantrine was better than sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine.

Antimalarials↗
PubMed2005

Immunosuppressant and immunomodulatory treatment for dermatomyositis and polymyositis.

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies are chronic skeletal diseases with significant mortality and morbidity despite treatment by corticosteroids. Immunosuppressive agents and immunomodulatory therapy are used to improve disease control and reduce the long-term side effects of corticosteroids. While these treatments are used commonly in routine clinical practice, the optimal therapeutic regimen remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: To systematically review the evidence for the effectiveness of immunosuppressants and immunomodulatory treatments for dermatomyositis and polymyositis. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group trials register (searched February 2002 and updated in November 2003) and MEDLINE (January 1966 to December 2002). We checked bibliographies of identified trials and wrote to disease experts. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials including patients with probable or definite dermatomyositis and polymyositis as defined by the criteria of Bohan and Peter or definite, probable or mild/early by the criteria of Dalakas. Patients with inclusion body myositis should have been excluded by muscle biopsies. Any immunosuppressant or immunomodulatory treatment including corticosteroids, azathioprine, methotrexate, ciclosporin, chlorambucil, cyclophosphamide, intravenous immunoglobulin, interferon and plasma exchange was considered. Primary outcome was assessment of muscle strength after at least six months. Other outcomes were: change in disability, number of relapses and time to relapse, number of patients in remission and time-to-remission, cumulative corticosteroid dose and serious adverse effects. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors (EC and JH) independently selected trials for inclusion in the review. Four authors independently assessed each study. Methodological criteria and the results of each study were recorded on data extraction forms. MAIN RESULTS: Seven potentially relevant randomised controlled trials were identified. One trial was excluded. Three studies compared immunosuppressant with placebo control, one trial compared one immunosuppressant (methotrexate) with another (azathioprine), another trial compared ciclosporin A with methotrexate and the final trial compared intramuscular methotrexate with oral methotrexate plus azathioprine. The study comparing intravenous immunoglobulin with placebo concluded that the former was superior. Two randomised placebo-controlled trials assessing plasma exchange, leukapheresis and azathioprine produced negative results. The fourth study compared azathioprine with methotrexate and found azathioprine and methotrexate equally effective but methotrexate had a better side effect profile. The fifth study comparing ciclosporin A with methotrexate and the sixth study comparing intramuscular methotrexate with oral methotrexate plus azathioprine found no statistically significant differences between the treatment groups. Immunosuppressants are associated with significant side effects. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review highlights the lack of high quality randomised controlled trials that assess the efficacy and toxicity of immunosuppressants in inflammatory myositis.

Azathioprine↗
PubMed2000

Systematic review of comparative efficacy and tolerability of calcipotriol in treating chronic plaque psoriasis.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the comparative efficacy and tolerability of topical calcipotriol in the treatment of mild to moderate chronic plaque psoriasis. DESIGN: Quantitative systematic review of randomised controlled trials. SUBJECTS: 6038 patients with plaque psoriasis reported in 37 trials. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mean difference in percentage change in scores on psoriasis area and severity index, and response rate ratios for both patients' and investigators' overall assessments of marked improvement or better. Adverse effects were estimated with the rate ratio, rate difference, and number needed to treat. RESULTS: Calcipotriol was at least as effective as potent topical corticosteroids, calcitriol, short contact dithranol, tacalcitol, coal tar, and combined coal tar 5%, allantoin 2%, and hydrocortisone 0.5%. Calcipotriol caused significantly more skin irritation than potent topical corticosteroids (number needed to treat to harm for irritation 10, 95% confidence interval 6 to 34). Calcipotriol monotherapy also caused more irritation than calcipotriol combined with a potent topical corticosteroid (6, 4 to 8). However, the number needed to treat for dithranol to produce lesional or perilesional irritation was 4 (3 to 5). On average, treating 23 patients with short contact dithranol led to one more patient dropping out of treatment owing to adverse effects than if they were treated with calcipotriol. CONCLUSIONS: Calcipotriol is an effective treatment for mild to moderate chronic plaque psoriasis, more so than calcitriol, tacalcitol, coal tar, and short contact dithranol. Only potent topical corticosteroids seem to have comparable efficacy at eight weeks. Although calcipotriol caused more skin irritation than topical corticosteroids this has to be balanced against the potential long term effects of corticosteroids. Skin irritation rarely led to withdrawal of calcipotriol treatment. Longer term comparative trials of calcipotriol versus dithranol and topical corticosteroids are needed to see whether these short term benefits are mirrored by long term outcomes such as duration of remission and improvement in quality of life.

Administration, Topical↗
PubMed2005

Treatment of acne with topical antibiotics: lessons from clinical studies.

BACKGROUND: Over the past 20 years, major concerns have been repeatedly expressed over antibiotic-resistant acne in Europe and in the U.S.A. However, the clinical significance of these resistance patterns is poorly defined so that topical antibiotics remain one of the cornerstones of acne management. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether we are facing decreased efficacy of topical formulations of erythromycin and clindamycin in clinical trials of therapeutic interventions for acne. METHODS: To review systematically the results of the clinical trials investigating topical formulations of erythromycin and clindamycin for the treatment of inflammatory acne and to establish whether or not there is a decrease in the efficacy of these topical antibiotic formulations since their widespread introduction in the mid 1970s. RESULTS: Of the 50 eligible controlled trials identified using a systematic electronic database search strategy, 45 (90%) incorporated a lesion count, making comparison across trials possible. Analysis of clinical studies investigating the effect of topical erythromycin in acne patients indicates a significant decrease in the effect of this antibiotic on inflammatory and noninflammatory lesion count over time (r = -2.140, P = 0.001 and r = -2.032, P = 0.001, respectively). Efficacy of topical clindamycin remained stable during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: There is a gradual decrease in the efficacy of topical erythromycin in clinical trials of therapeutic intervention for acne, which is probably related to the development of antibiotic-resistant propionibacteria.

Acne Vulgaris↗
PubMed2000

Early emergency department treatment of acute asthma with systemic corticosteroids.

BACKGROUND: The airway edema and secretions associated with acute asthma are most effectively treated with anti-inflammatories such as corticosteroids delivered by inhaled, oral, intravenous or intra-muscular routes. There is an unresolved debate about the use of systemic corticorticoids in the early treatment of acute asthma for emergency department patients. OBJECTIVES: To determine the benefit of treating patients with acute asthma with systemic corticosteroids within an hour of presenting to the emergency department (ED). SEARCH STRATEGY: Randomised controlled trials were identified from the Cochrane Airways Group Asthma Register. Primary authors and content experts were contacted to identify eligible studies. Bibliographies from included studies and known reviews were searched. SELECTION CRITERIA: Only randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-randomised trials were eligible for inclusion. Studies were included if patients presenting to the ED with acute asthma were treated with IV/IM or oral corticosteroids (CS) vs. placebo within 1 hour of arrival and either admission rate or pulmonary function results were reported. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Trial selection, data extraction and quality assessment were carried out independently by two reviewers, and confirmed with corresponding authors. MAIN RESULTS: Twelve studies involving 863 patients (435 corticosteroids; 428 placebo) were included. Early use of CS for acute asthma in the ED significantly reduced admission rates (N = 11; pooled OR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.21 to 0.78). This would correspond with a number needed to treat of 8 (95% CI: 5 to 21). This benefit was more pronounced for those not receiving systemic CS prior to ED presentation (N = 7; OR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.19 to 0.70) and those with more severe asthma (N = 7; OR: 0.35, 95% CI: 0.21 to 0. 59). Oral CS therapy in children was particularly effective (N = 3; OR: 0.24, 95% CI: 0.11 to 0.53); no trials in adults used the oral route. Side effects were not significantly different between corticosteroid treatments and placebo. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Use of corticosteroids within 1 hour of presentation to an ED significantly reduces the need for hospital admission in patients with acute asthma. Benefits appear greatest in patients with more severe asthma, and those not currently receiving steroids. Children appear to respond well to oral steroids.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2001

Second-line chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: The role of second-line chemotherapy for the treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have relapsed or failed to respond to first-line treatment was unclear. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness of any second-line chemotherapy in patients with NSCLC. SEARCH STRATEGY: Bibliographic databases were searched. Handsearching and contact with experts was also performed. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled clinical trials in which any second-line chemotherapy was compared with BSC in patients with NSCLC who had previously failed to any previous chemotherapy regimen. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data was extracted by 2 independent reviewers and revised by all authors. MAIN RESULTS: Only one study was included. It randomised 204 patients to receive either doxetaxel or BSC. Following an unacceptably high toxic death rate the dose of doxetaxel was reduced from 100 mg/m(2) to 75 mg/m(2). Doxetaxel gave an extra 2.4 months of survival - an average of 7.0 months vs 4.6 months on BSC. At 1 year after diagnosis 29% of doxetaxel treated patients were alive compared with 19% of the BSC group. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Definitive recommendations cannot be made since evidence is only available from one randomised controlled trial which, though of reasonable quality, had a number of limitations. There is currently no evidence to support second-line treatment of patients with poor performance status. Larger, well-designed controlled trials are needed to further evaluate whether the benefits of second-line chemotherapy to patients with NSCLC outweigh its risks and costs.

Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic↗
PubMed2000

St John's wort for depression: a systematic review.

To address whether St John's wort is useful for the treatment of depression we attempted to retrieve all English-language articles with data on the efficacy, safety, and availability of St John's wort. Randomized, controlled, double-blind trials were selected and assessed for methodological quality using a standardized checklist, and data on pharmacology, cost, regulation, and safety were extracted. Eight studies were identified, found to be of generally good methodological quality, and determined to provide a modest amount of data to suggest that St John's wort is more effective than placebo in the treatment of mild to moderate depression. The absolute increased response rate with the use of St John's wort ranged from 23% to 55% higher than with placebo, but ranged from 6% to 18% lower compared with tricyclic antidepressants. More data are required to assess both its use in severe depression and its efficacy compared with other antidepressants. Rates of side effects were low. As a dietary supplement, St John's wort is currently largely unregulated, but the Food and Drug Administration is reviewing plans to tighten its regulatory oversight.

Antidepressive Agents↗
PubMed2002

Ribavirin with or without alpha interferon versus no intervention, placebo or alpha interferon for chronic hepatitis C.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C is a major cause of liver-related morbidity and mortality. Ribavirin plus interferon combination therapy is presently considered the optimal treatment of interferon naive patients with chronic hepatitis C, but its role in relapsers and non-responders to previous interferon therapy is not established. OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and safety of ribavirin alone or in combination with alpha interferon in interferon naive patients, relapsers, and non-responders with chronic hepatitis C. SEARCH STRATEGY: Eligible trials were identified through electronic databases, manual searches of bibliographies and journals, authors of trials, and pharmaceutical companies producing ribavirin or interferon (August 2001). SELECTION CRITERIA: We included all randomised trials comparing ribavirin with or without alpha interferon versus no intervention, placebo, or alpha interferon for chronic hepatitis C. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The primary outcome measures were the 'sustained' (six months after treatment) virological response, and morbidity plus mortality. The secondary outcome measures were the 'end of treatment' and 'sustained' biochemical response, the 'end of treatment' virologic response, histology, quality of life, and adverse events. MAIN RESULTS: We included eight trials in which 271 patients were randomised to ribavirin versus placebo or no intervention and 48 trials in which 6585 patients were randomised to interferon with or without ribavirin. Compared with placebo or no intervention, ribavirin monotherapy had no significant effect on the virological response or histology and only a transient effect on the biochemical response. Compared with interferon, combination therapy reduced the risk of not having a sustained virological response by 26% in naive patients (relative risk (RR) 0.74; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70-0.78), 33% in relapsers (RR 0.67; 95% CI 0.57-0.78), and 11% in non-responders (RR 0.89; 95% CI 0.83-0.96). There was no significant effect on morbidity plus mortality (Peto odds ratio 0.45; 95% CI 0.19-1.06). Irrespective of previous therapy, combination therapy significantly reduced the risk of not having a sustained biochemical response (RR 0.76; 95% CI 0.59-0.84) or improved histology (RR 0.67; 95% CI 0.56-0.81). Combination therapy also significantly increased the risk of treatment discontinuation (RR 1.28; 95% CI 1.07-1.52) and several types of adverse events. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy increased the number of naive patients, relapsers, and non-responders with a sustained virological, biochemical, or histological response, but also the occurrence of adverse events.

Antiviral Agents↗
PubMed2000

Adjuvant chemotherapy for localised resectable soft tissue sarcoma in adults. Sarcoma Meta-analysis Collaboration (SMAC).

BACKGROUND: Individually, randomised trilas have not shown conclusively whether adjuvant chemotherapy benefits adult patients with localised resectable soft-tissue sarcoma. OBJECTIVES: Adjuvant chemotherapy aims to lessen the recurrence of cancer after surgery with or without radiotherapy. The objective of this review was to assess the effects of adjuvant chemotherapy in adults with resectable soft tissue sarcoma after such local treatment. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, UKCCCR Register of Cancer Trials, Physicians Data Query, EMBASE, MEDLINE and CancerLit. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials of adjuvant chemotherapy after local treatment in adults with localised resectable soft tissue sarcoma were included. Only trials in which accrual was completed by December 1992 were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Individual patient data were obtained. Accuracy of data and quality of randomisation and follow-up of trials was assessed. MAIN RESULTS: Fourteen trials of doxorubicin-based adjuvant chemotherapy involving 1568 patients were included. Median follow-up was 9.4 years. For local recurrence-free interval the hazard ratio with chemotherapy was 0.73 (95% Confidence Interval 0.56-0.94). For distant recurrence-free interval it was 0. 70 (95% CI 0.57-0.85). For overall recurrence-free survival it was 0. 75 (95% CI 0.64-0.87). These correspond to significant absolute benefits of 6-10% at 10 years. For overall survival the hazard ratio of 0.89 (95% CI 0.76-1.03) was not significant but potentially represents an absolute benefit of 4% (95% CI -1 to 9) at 10 years. There was no consistent evidence of a difference in effect according to age, sex, stage, site, grade, histology, extent of resection, tumour size or exposure to radiotherapy. However, the strongest evidence of a beneficial effect on survival was shown in patients with sarcoma of the extremities. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Doxorubicin-based adjuvant chemotherapy appears to significantly improve time to local and distant recurrence and overall recurrence-free survival in adults with localised resectable soft tissue sarcoma. There is some evidence of a trend towards improved overall survival.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Obstacles and opportunities in meta-analysis of genetic association studies.

Genetic association studies have the potential to advance our understanding of genotype-phenotype relationships, especially for common, complex diseases where other approaches, such as linkage, are less powerful. Unfortunately, many reported studies are not replicated or corroborated. This lack of reproducibility has many potential causes, relating to study design, sample size, and power issues, and from sources of true variability among populations. Genetic association studies can be considered as more similar to randomized trials than other types of observational epidemiological studies because of "Mendelian randomization" (Mendel's second law). The rationale and methodology for synthesizing randomized trials is highly relevant to the meta-analysis of genetic association studies. Nevertheless, there are a number of obstacles to overcome when performing such meta-analyses. In this review, the impacts of Type I error, lack of power, and publication and reporting biases are explored, and the role of multiple testing is discussed. A number of special features of association studies are especially pertinent, because they may lead to true variability among study results. These include population dynamics and structure, linkage disequilibrium, conformity to Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium, bias, population stratification, statistical heterogeneity, epistatic and environmental interactions, and the choice of statistical models used in the analysis. Approaches to dealing with these issues are outlined. The supreme importance of complete and consistent study reporting and of making data readily available is also highlighted as a prerequisite for sound meta-analysis. We believe that systematic review and meta-analysis has an important role to play in understanding genetic association studies and should help us to separate the wheat from the chaff.

Epistasis, Genetic↗
PubMed2001

Should children with Bell's palsy be treated with corticosteroids? A systematic review.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of corticosteroids in the treatment of pediatric Bell's palsy. A systematic review of trials that included pediatric (< 16 years old) cases with Bell's palsy and involved the use of steroids was conducted. Eight trials were identified, five of which were randomized, and prednisone was used in six trials, whereas corticotropin was used in the other two. The methods of randomization and allocation concealment of the treatments used were rarely reported. Only one trial was done exclusively in children; none of the other seven trials analyzed the pediatric cases separately. Four trials reported some benefit from steroids. The pediatric trial did not provide evidence for benefit from corticosteroids. There was substantial heterogeneity in the population and interventions used; hence a meta-analysis was not done. Based on this systematic review, we do not recommend the routine use of steroids in children with Bell's palsy.

Adolescent↗