Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Questionnaires”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 487 records · Page 27Linked to original sources

[Continuing medical education via questionnaire studies. Three pilot projects for anesthesiology, cardiology and neurology].

The Danish Medical Association and the scientific societies have initiated three studies to evaluate the use of questionnaires for continuous medical education. One study was a questionnaire in anaesthesiology with 30 questions with answers yes/no/no answer, which was sent to 600 specialists in anaesthesiology. One study was in cardiology with a multiple choice questionnaire, sent to 300 general practitioners and 75 specialists in internal medicine outside cardiology. One study concerned the educational value of State-of-the-Art articles about neurology in Ugeskrift for Laeger (Journal of the Danish Medical Association) sent to 500 doctors outside neurology. All questionnaires were sent anonymously, with one general reminder. For the anaesthesiology study 234 questionnaires were returned (40.5%). In the cardiology study 195 questionnaires were returned (52%). For the study on neurology 278 answered (56%). Only about half of the questionnaires were returned for the three studies, and a lot of effort and resources were put into the studies. An extension from these small pilot studies to a general systematic continuous methodology with updated questionnaires in the postgraduate medical education seems troublesome. An optional self-registration for medical education such as The Canadian "Mocomp concept" might be a more realistic suggestion.

Anesthesiology↗

[Development and use of a questionnaire for evaluating teacher continuing education on the sex abuse topic].

The authors constructed a questionnaire to evaluate a ten-day-training curriculum for educators concerning the topic of sexual abuse of children. This questionnaire measures learning outcomes as well as behavioral change at work. It consists of three parts: a knowledge test, an attitude questionnaire and a self-report questionnaire. The contents correspond to the training goals. As part of the evaluation study the questionnaire was completed by a sample of 129 educators. The inspection of item-difficulty and reliability yielded positive results-further amelioration can be achieved by minor changes. First analyses confirm the hypothesis that the self-report questionnaire is also a valid instrument for training evaluation. The questionnaire was highly accepted by the trainees, and the costs of evaluation were relatively low. Thus the questionnaire can be recommended as an evaluation instrument for trainings with similar goals and trainees.

Adolescent↗

[The validity of the IPSS questionnaire in a sample of 262 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia].

OBJECTIVE: The IPSS is a well-known method for symptom evaluation in patients with prostate disease. The present study analyzes the validity of this self-administered questionnaire in a group of patients from an industrial area in Spain. METHODS: 513 questionnaires (test 1) were sent out to patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) who had undergone TUR or adenomectomy. After an interval of 30-60 days, the same questionnaire (test 2) was sent out to all those patients who had correctly answered test 1. The feasibility and reliability of this test in our hands, as well as its ability to discriminate, were determined. Moreover, the relationship between symptoms (S) and quality of life (L) was analyzed. RESULTS: Patient ages ranged from 50 to 86 years (mean 67.6). A) Feasibility (percentage of patients who answered the questionnaire correctly) was 71%. B) Reliability: internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) was 0.74 and the retest reliability (correlation between the scores of tests 1 and 2) was 0.76 (Pearson's r) and 0.5 (Kendall's T). C) Correlation between symptoms (S) and quality of life (L) was 0.53 (Pearson) and 0.33 (Kendall). D) Discriminating validity (ability of the test alone to diagnose patients with BPH correctly). The patients in the study were compared with a group of 420 "healthy" males from a prostate cancer screening program; the area below the ROC curve was 0.98 (scantily evaluable: healthy patients vs surgical BPH cases). CONCLUSIONS: In our setting, the self-administered IPSS questionnaire had a moderate feasibility (29% of the patients were unable to understand the questionnaire). Our results, in terms of internal consistency and retest reliability, are similar to those of other validation studies conducted in our country (and appreciably worse than those of the original validation studies in the English language). Nevertheless, some items of the questionnaire have an unacceptable retest reliability, particularly those relating to frequency or urgency. Finally, the total symptom (S) score showed a scanty correlation with quality of life (L). We can conclude that although the IPSS questionnaire is a useful method in the assessment of patients with prostate disease, its reliability remains far from optimal.

Aged↗

Confirming the theoretical structure of the Japanese version of the McGill Pain Questionnaire in chronic pain.

OBJECTIVE: Based upon a tripartite theoretical model of pain, the Pain Rating Index of the McGill Pain Questionnaire continues to be one of the most frequently used instruments to measure clinical pain. However, differences in languages and cultural backgrounds have hindered its wide use and standardization in Japan. Although a number of exploratory factor analytic studies have failed to consistently support the theoretical structure of the instrument, a few previous confirmatory factor analytic studies did statistically support the a priori model. The purpose of this study was to test the theoretical structure of a Japanese version of the McGill Pain Questionnaire, which followed a format similar to the original questionnaire, through a confirmatory factor analysis. DESIGN: This study used confirmatory factor analysis on prospectively collected data from consecutive outpatients with chronic pain at a university hospital to test the hypothesis regarding the theoretical structure of the Japanese McGill Pain Questionnaire. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The first 16 Pain Rating Index subclass scores were subjected to confirmatory factor analysis procedures that yielded a well-fitting final model that explained 91% of the covariance in the observed data. The results approximately supported the hypothesis that the sensory, affective, and evaluative subscales of the Pain Rating Index are representative of the multidimensionality of the pain experience with minimal overlap but could not disregard relatively high intercorrelations among those subscales similar to the original McGill Pain Questionnaire. It is suggested that the theoretical structure of the McGill Pain Questionnaire is approximately kept in the Japanese McGill Pain Questionnaire used in this study. Therefore, the translation-based Japanese McGill Pain Questionnaire used in this study adequately permits comparison of studies from English-speaking and non-English-speaking populations, thus facilitating the first step toward international research exchange and communications.

Journal Article↗

The process of developing a research questionnaire to measure attitudes to shared learning.

This article discusses the process by which a questionnaire was developed specifically to measure attitude to shared learning. Over a three-year period the attitude questionnaire was developed and tested using pre-registration students who were engaged in a shared learning programme. These pre-registration students were from three professional groups, namely occupational therapy (OT), diagnostic radiography (DR), and therapeutic radiography (TR). While the study hypothesis was that shared learning would improve attitudes over the three-year period, the focus of this article is to discuss the process by which the research instrument was developed. The rationale for focusing on the process is a simple one. After a diligent literature search it was clear that there were no attitude questionnaires specific to attitude measurement in relation to shared learning. Thus without an already validated attitude to a shared learning questionnaire, it became imperative to create systematically a credible attitude measure of shared learning. The process centred on understanding how monadic scales are constructed and used to measure attitudes and perceptions of participants. Amongst a number of processes to be followed was the need also to check the reliability of the developed questionnaire. This was done using the Cronbach alpha coefficient. A Cronbach alpha coefficient of 0.7 was set as a minimum reliability requirement, which was duly satisfied. The outcome of this process was that it very useful to learn how to produce a suitable instrument to measure attitude to shared learning and to add in a small way to the range of attitude questionnaires available.

Journal Article↗

The effect of using short versus detailed self-administered questionnaires on the estimate of illicit drug use among young adults.

We compared two study instruments in use in the Israel Defence Forces to ascertain the prevalence of illicit drug use: a short versus a detailed self-administered anonymous questionnaire. A relatively lower estimate of illicit drug use was found among subjects that answered the short questionnaire. The difference was noted for lifetime prevalence of illicit drug use for women but not for men (6.5% of women reported ever use of illicit drugs using the detailed questionnaire versus 2.1% of women using the short questionnaire, p = 0.002); for prevalence of infrequent illicit drug use (3.3% of men and 3.4% of women reported less than monthly use of illicit drugs using the detailed questionnaire versus 0.2% of men and none of the women with the short questionnaire; p = 0.004 and p < 0.001, respectively), but not for frequent use (i e monthly or more). There was no difference in the percent of subjects that admitted that they knew where to get drugs. We conclude that the short questionnaire in routine use for more than a decade is a useful instrument when compared with the detailed questionnaire, in that the yield of important information such as frequent illicit drug use is similar. This is achieved with the benefit of greater convenience and ease of application to large samples at a lower cost.

Journal Article↗

Cross-cultural adaptation of the Norwegian versions of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Index.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate reliability and construct validity of the Norwegian versions of the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire and the modified Oswestry Disability Index. DESIGN: Translation of two functional status questionnaires and a cross-sectional study of measurement properties. METHODS: The questionnaires were translated and back-translated following the Guillemin criteria. The Norwegian versions were tested for 55 patients with acute low back pain and 50 patients with chronic low back pain. Test-retest with a 2-day interval was performed in a subsample of 28 patients from the chronic sample. Reliability was assessed by repeatability according to Bland and Altman, intraclass coefficient and coefficient of variation. Internal consistency was assessed by Cronbach's alpha. Concurrent construct validity was assessed with correlations between the questionnaires and the SF-36, Disability Rating Index and pain intensity. RESULTS: Repeatability of the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire was 4 points, coefficient of variation 15% and intraclass correlation coefficient 0.89, and of the modified Oswestry Disability Index 11, 12% and 0.88, respectively. Internal consistency was 0.94 for both questionnaires. The questionnaires correlated highly with the physical functioning scale of SF-36, moderately with pain, and low with mental scales of the SF-36. CONCLUSION: The reliability and construct validity of the Norwegian versions of the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire and the modified Oswestry Disability Index are acceptable for assessing functional status of Norwegian-speaking patients with low back pain.

Acute Disease↗

[Development of an illness-specific instrument for assessment of quality of life in patients with arterial occlusive disease (Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease 86 Questionnaire)].

Impairment in health-related quality of life in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) are well-known to clinicians, but due to the lack of disease specific assessment instruments, have not been systematically investigated. We describe the development and psychometric testing of a 86-items patient-based questionnaire for the assessment of the quality of life in PAOD containing 7 dimensions: functional status, pain, symptoms, mood, disease related anxiety, social life and treatment evaluation. The questionnaire was included along with standard questionnaires in a prospective study with 308 patients suffering from PAOD in Fontaine stages I to IV before and one week into treatment. Psychometric testing pertained to reliability (internal consistency, retest), validity (convergent, discriminant) and sensitivity (treatment-related change over time). In addition patient acceptance of the questionnaire was assessed. Psychometric testing yield exellent results regarding scale structure and reliability of the newly developed questionnaire. Validity was reflected in high correlations with standard generic questionnaires and in discriminating in quality of life between patients according to disease severity. The sensitivity was reflected in improved quality of life ratings in patients with improved treadmill performance. Patients needed 20 minutes for responding and rated the questionnaire to be easily understandable and not exhausting. These results show that the newly developed PAVK-86 questionnaire is a reliable, valid and sensitive instrument for the assessment of quality of life in patients with arterial occlusive disease which can be used in clinical studies, epidemiological research and quality assurance programs.

Activities of Daily Living↗

The accuracy of a lead questionnaire in predicting elevated pediatric blood lead levels.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of elevated blood lead levels and to evaluate the accuracy of a lead screening questionnaire in a western United States urban inner-city pediatric population. DESIGN: A convenience sample of children between the ages of 6 months and 6 years seen for a well-child visit were enrolled. Venous blood lead levels were measured and a lead screening questionnaire was completed. SETTING: The primary care clinics of the 10 community health centers of the city and county of Denver, Colorado. Approximately 85% of children receiving services are below the 150% poverty level and 54% are insured through the state's Medicaid program. SUBJECTS: A total of 2978 children seen for a well-child visit from February 1993 to January 1994. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The prevalence of elevated blood lead levels and the operating characteristics of both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention lead screening questionnaire and the complete questionnaire used in Denver, using venous blood lead levels as the criterion standard. RESULTS: The mean blood lead level was 0.20 mumol/L (4.19 micrograms/dL). Eighty-five children had blood lead levels of 0.48 mumol/L (10 micrograms/dL), representing 2.9% of the study group (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.3-3.5). Only 0.3% of the cohort had blood lead levels greater than 0.96 mumol/L (20 micrograms/dL). The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention questionnaire was 57%, 51%, and 3%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of the complete questionnaire was 59.7%, 36%, and 2.6%, respectively. The marginal cost of identifying a child with a blood lead level greater than 0.96 mumol/L (20 micrograms/dL) was $4925. CONCLUSIONS: Few of the low-income children in this study had blood lead levels greater than 0.48 mumol/L (10 micrograms/dL). The questionnaire did little better than chance at predicting the presence or absence of elevated blood lead levels and cannot replace a blood lead level test for childhood lead screening in this community.

Adolescent↗

Medical clearance for respirator use: sensitivity and specificity of a questionnaire.

BACKGROUND: OSHA regulations require that workers receive medical clearance prior to respirator use, and recently, a detailed questionnaire has been provided to assist with this purpose. However, there are limited published data on the sensitivity and specificity of self-administered questionnaires for identifying individuals who may safely wear a respirator. METHODS: We tested 474 consecutive workers at a Department of Energy complex. After completing the self-administered questionnaire, all workers received a standardized physician evaluation including interview, physical examination, and spirometry. The outcomes of the questionnaire assessment were compared to the outcomes of physician evaluation. RESULTS: Data for analysis were available from 413 of workers (87%). All workers received medical clearance; only 10 workers (2.4%) received work restrictions. The questionnaire demonstrated 100% sensitivity in identifying workers who required work restrictions, but had specificity of only 19%. Compared to physician evaluation, the questionnaire had modest sensitivity to the detection of chronic medical conditions. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the rates of medical clearance for respirator use are very high, and that a self-administered questionnaire may be appropriate for medical clearance in certain settings. It is recommended that the policy of routine physician evaluation and spirometry for respirator clearance be re-examined.

Adult↗

The assessment of rheumatoid arthritis and the acceptability of self-report questionnaires in clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the acceptability of self-report questionnaires (SRQ) in clinical practice and to understand the value that rheumatologists give to various assessment methods in rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: Rheumatologists who completed a training course in the use of SRQ in clinical trials and clinical practice used the SRQ in their practices. Six months later 221 rheumatologists completed a survey regarding their experiences in assessing rheumatoid arthritis and in the use of SRQ. RESULTS: Prior to the start of the program, 18% of rheumatologists used self-report questionnaires, 6 months later, 48% were using SRQ in their practices. Rheumatologists who did not use questionnaires placed less value on all assessment methods, and particularly on questionnaire assessments of function and pain. They also were more likely to report that questionnaires were difficult to use, not accepted by staff, were too long, and that they had limited staff. Rheumatologists who used the questionnaires reported none of these difficulties and were satisfied with the benefits provide by SRQ. When assessment measures were ranked, rheumatologist ranked ACR 20, radiography, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate/c-reactive protein as the least important in both clinical trials and in clinical practice, and they rated swollen and tender joint counts followed by SRQ as the most useful assessment tools. CONCLUSION: SRQ are well received by rheumatologists, and following a training program almost 50% continued to use SRQ in their practices. Those who used questionnaires were generally more positive about assessments and had little difficulty in the technical aspects of administration, scoring, and interpretation.

Aged↗

Relative validity and repeatability of a new questionnaire on physical activity.

BACKGROUND: A physical activity questionnaire was developed with the aim to estimate usual individual daily energy expenditure. The questionnaire focused on the number of hours usually spent on various activities. In a pilot study it was tested for repeatability and validity in a population of 126 Dutch adults (64 men, 62 women). METHODS: For assessment of repeatability the questionnaire was administered three times during the course of 1 year. A four-times-repeated 3-day activity diary was used as a reference instrument to evaluate validity. RESULTS: Differences in mean energy expenditure among repeated administrations of the questionnaire were small and not significant. Spearman's test-retest correlation coefficients for total energy expenditure for men were 0.76 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.63-0.85] and 0.70 (95% CI 0.54-0.81) at 5 and 11 months, respectively, and for women were 0.58 (95% CI 0.36-0.74) and 0.71 (95% CI 0.54-0.82). There was a significant trend showing increasing mean diary energy expenditure for successive tertiles of questionnaire energy expenditure. The correlation between the questionnaire and the diary was 0.66 (95% CI 0.49-0.78) for men and 0.43 (95% CI 0.18-0.63) for women. CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that this questionnaire is a useful tool for estimating energy expenditure in epidemiological studies.

Adult↗

Factorial validity and invariance of questionnaires measuring social-cognitive determinants of physical activity among adolescent girls.

BACKGROUND: There are few theoretically derived questionnaires of physical activity determinants among youth, and the existing questionnaires have not been subjected to tests of factorial validity and invariance. The present study employed confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to test the factorial validity and invariance of questionnaires designed to be unidimensional measures of attitudes, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control, and self-efficacy about physical activity. METHODS: Adolescent girls in eighth grade from two cohorts (N = 955 and 1,797) completed the questionnaires at baseline; participants from cohort 1 (N = 845) also completed the questionnaires in ninth grade (i.e., 1-year follow-up). Factorial validity and invariance were tested using CFA with full-information maximum likelihood estimation in AMOS 4.0. Initially, baseline data from cohort 1 were employed to test the fit and, when necessary, to modify the unidimensional models. The models were cross-validated using a multigroup analysis of factorial invariance on baseline data from cohorts 1 and 2. The models then were subjected to a longitudinal analysis of factorial invariance using baseline and follow-up data from cohort 1. RESULTS: The CFAs supported the fit of unidimensional models to the four questionnaires, and the models were cross-validated, as indicated by evidence of multigroup factorial invariance. The models also possessed evidence of longitudinal factorial invariance. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence was provided for the factorial validity and the invariance of the questionnaires designed to be unidimensional measures of attitudes, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control, and self-efficacy about physical activity among adolescent girls.

Adolescent↗

Quantitating qualitative issues in residency training: development and testing of a scaled program evaluation questionnaire.

OBJECTIVES: To develop and test a scaled program evaluation questionnaire focusing on resident satisfaction with workload, learning environment, and stress. DESIGN/PARTICIPANTS: Phase 1: A cross-section of 92 residents from five programs completed questionnaires for factor analysis and descriptive statistics. Phase 2: A three-year prospective study of questionnaire responses in a single program. QUESTIONNAIRE DEVELOPMENT: After extensive literature review, 33 Likert-scaled statements were written, dealing with situational, personal, and professional issues. After pilot testing, the 92 questionnaires obtained in Phase 1 were factor analyzed, resulting in three distinct scales: workload, faculty/learning environment, and stress. INTERVENTIONS: Program changes in Phase 2 included the introduction of a night float between 1989 and 1990, and an increase in senior resident call between 1990 and 1991. RESULTS: Phase 1: The first-year residents reported significantly less stress and generally greater satisfaction with workload and learning environment than did the second- or third-year residents. Marked differences between programs were also present in the mean scores on all three scales. Phase 2: The introduction of a night float did not significantly affect response to the questionnaire, but the increase in nights on call significantly increased stress and dissatisfaction with the faculty/learning environment. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the techniques needed to develop and use scaled program evaluation questionnaires. It is hoped that widespread use and validation of such instruments may result in greater responsiveness to the needs of trainees and more facilitative environments in which to acquire medical knowledge.

Cross-Sectional Studies↗

[Development of a questionnaire to assess the quality of the preanesthetic visit].

In the current study a questionnaire was developed to evaluate the preanesthetic visit to prepare patients for general anesthesia with regard to the effects on in-hospital quality of care. The questionnaire consists of one part pertaining to patient satisfaction and one part pertaining to the information gained from the preanesthetic visit. In a first phase, the questionnaire was generated and then validated in 104 patients undergoing general or vascular surgery at the University of Heidelberg, Germany. As a result of the pretest evaluation, the preliminary pool of questions could be reduced. Consequently, the final questionnaire is composed of six questions on patient satisfaction and six questions on information gained after the preanesthetic visit as well as one question regarding the number of preanesthetic consultations prior to general anesthesia. In the part of the questionnaire on patient satisfaction, responses can be given on a 6-point scale ranging from -3 (statement is not correct) to +3 (statement is correct). The scores -3 to +3 are assigned 1-6 points, in order to calculate a total sum score to measure patient satisfaction. The part on information gained contains multiple-choice questions with four possible answers, of which only one is correct. Analogous to the measurement of patient satisfaction, a total sum score can be calculated to evaluate the information gain after the preanesthetic visit. The present study shows the suitability of a questionnaire to evaluate the quality of health care after the preanesthetic visit with the parameters patient satisfaction and information gain. Such a questionnaire can be used to compare different premedication techniques and, thus, might contribute to improve the quality of health care.

Adult↗

Comparison of health-related quality of life questionnaires in ambulatory oncology.

The purpose of this study is to compare three commonly used health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) questionnaires for their ease of use, accuracy, and patient preference; identify factors related to patient preference; identify differences in patient completion rates; and to identify factors associated with patient completion of these questionnaires. Three psychometrically sound measures, the Symptom Distress Scale (SDS), Medical Outcome Study Short Form-36 (SF-36), and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT), were tested. Seventy-nine patients completed questionnaires in the ambulatory oncology setting. No significant differences in patient ratings were found in ease of use and accuracy among the questionnaires. All of the questionnaires were rated as easy to use and accurate. Patient ratings on preference were marginally significant (p = 0.07). Forty-six percent of participants indicated that they preferred the SDS, whereas 27% and 39% preferred the SF-36 and the FACT. No significant differences in patient completion rates were found among the questionnaires. One hundred percent completion rates ranged from 88.6% for the SDS to 78.5% for the SF-36, and 80% completion rates ranged from 98.7% for the SDS to 94.9% for the SF-36. Administration of standardized HR-QOL questionnaires is feasible in the clinical setting.

Activities of Daily Living↗

Development and evaluation of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire: a new functional status measure for coronary artery disease.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to establish the validity, reproducibility and responsiveness of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire, a 19-item self-administered questionnaire measuring five dimensions of coronary artery disease: physical limitation, anginal stability, anginal frequency, treatment satisfaction and disease perception. BACKGROUND: Assessing the functional status of patients is becoming increasingly important in both clinical research and quality assurance programs. No current functional status measure quantifies all of the important domains affected by coronary artery disease. METHODS: Cross-sectional or serial administration of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire was carried out in four groups of patients: 70 undergoing exercise treadmill testing, 58 undergoing coronary angioplasty, 160 with initially stable coronary artery disease and an additional 84 with coronary artery disease. Evidence of validity was sought by comparing the questionnaire's five scales with the duration of exercise treadmill tests, physician diagnoses, nitroglycerin refills and other validated instruments. Reproducibility and responsiveness were assessed by comparing serial responses over a 3-month interval. RESULTS: All five scales correlated significantly with other measures of diagnosis and patient function (r = 0.31 to 0.70, p < or = 0.001). Questionnaire responses of patients with stable coronary artery disease did not change over 3 months. The questionnaire was sensitive to both dramatic clinical change, as seen after successful coronary angioplasty, and to more subtle clinical change, as seen among outpatients with initially stable coronary artery disease. CONCLUSIONS: The Seattle Angina Questionnaire is a valid and reliable instrument that measures five clinically important dimensions of health in patients with coronary artery disease. It is sensitive to clinical change and should be a valuable measure of outcome in cardiovascular research.

Activities of Daily Living↗

Refusal and information bias associated with postal questionnaires and face-to-face interviews in very elderly subjects.

Our objectives were (1) to analyze the refusal bias associated with postal questionnaires and face-to-face interviews and (2) to compare responses elicited from a postal questionnaire with those provided by a face-to-face interview in subjects over 75 years of age. Our methods included a postal questionnaire sent to a representative sample of community-dwelling elderly individuals (n = 842). All subjects were also invited to participate in an in-home interview conducted by a trained nurse. One hundred and six subjects (12.6%) were nonrespondents to the postal questionnaire. These nonrespondents were more cognitively impaired, more disabled, and showed a higher 1-year mortality rate (13.2 versus 5.2%) than respondents. Late respondents who needed a reminder letter were similar to nonrespondents. One hundred and eighty-seven subjects (22.2%) refused to participate in the home interview. These nonparticipants were similar to the participants on age, sex, 1-year mortality rate, and responses given to all but two postal questions. Comparison of postal questionnaire responses and face-to-face responses revealed that agreement was substantial to moderate for factual information (kappa = 0.41 to 0.80) but poor for clinical information (depression, cognitive impairment, disability). A short index including age, sex, and six questions on disability was useful in identifying disabled subjects by a postal questionnaire. Our conclusion is that nonresponse bias is evidenced when postal questionnaires are utilized in the very elderly population and caution should be used when interpreting health data obtained by this technique. Refusal bias from face-to-face interviewing is less important in this population.

Activities of Daily Living↗