Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “PLACEBOS”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 487 records · Page 27Linked to original sources

Oral iloprost in the treatment of thromboangiitis obliterans (Buerger's disease): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. The European TAO Study Group.

OBJECTIVES: To assess efficacy and tolerability of two dosages of the oral prostacyclin analogue iloprost versus placebo in thromboangiitis obliterans (TAO). DESIGN: Placebo-controlled, double-blind, study; TAO patients randomised to iloprost 100, 200 micrograms, or placebo bid for 8 weeks, with 6 months' follow-up. METHODS: Three-hundred and nineteen TAO patients with rest pain, trophic lesions (or both) from 23 clinics in six European countries. Primary endpoint: total healing of most important lesion. Secondary endpoint: relief of rest pain without need of analgesics. Combined endpoint: alive without major amputation, no lesions, no rest pain, no use of analgesics. RESULTS: Total healing of lesions was not significantly different between treatment groups at any time point. For relief of rest pain without need of analgesics, low dose (LD) iloprost was significantly more effective than placebo at end of follow-up (placebo 49%; LD iloprost 63%; p = 0.020). This also applied to the combined endpoint (placebo 35%; LD iloprost 50%; p = 0.016). High dose iloprost (HD) failed to show significant treatment effects over placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Iloprost LD was significantly more effective than placebo for relief of rest pain without need of analgesics and for a combined endpoint at 6 months of follow-up, whilst both iloprost doses showed no significant effects vs. placebo on total healing of lesions.

Administration, Oral↗

Soy in hypercholesterolaemia: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To study whether Abacor, a product based on isolated soy protein with high and standardised levels of isoflavones and cotyledon soy fibres, was more effective in lowering total and LDL cholesterol than placebo. DESIGN: Randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel group, single centre study. SETTING: Primary care in Joensuu, North Karelia, Finland. SUBJECTS: Subjects were screened from the patient database of the health centre; 30 were randomised to the Abacor group and 30 subjects to placebo. Eight subjects were withdrawn, six from the active group, two from the placebo group. INTERVENTION: The preparations were given as two daily liquid supplements in addition to the subjects' regular diets for 6 weeks. RESULTS: Abacor showed a statistically significant lipid-lowering effect as compared to placebo, although an unexpected reduction was seen in the placebo group. The estimated difference between active treatment and placebo was 0.25 mmol/l (95% CI 0.01, 0.50; P=0.049) for total cholesterol, corresponding to reductions of 8.3 and 5.1%, respectively. The difference in reduction of LDL-cholesterol was 0.27 mmol/l (95% CI 0.06, 0.49; P=0.014) and corresponded to a reduction of 13.2% in the active treatment group, and 8.0% in the placebo group. Abacor showed a rapid onset of effect, as compared with placebo. During a wash-out period of 4 weeks after treatment, the subjects returned to pre-treatment cholesterol levels. CONCLUSION: Added to a regular diet, Abacor significantly reduced LDL-cholesterol and total cholesterol. These beneficial effects occurred within 6 weeks of treatment.

Adolescent↗

Growth hormone (GH) replacement therapy reduces serum sialic acid concentrations in adults with GH-deficiency: a double-blind placebo-controlled study.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with adult GH-deficiency are thought to have an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Sialic acid (SA) concentrations have been proposed as a marker of atherosclerotic disease probably related to an inflammatory response of the arterial wall. SA as a marker of cardiovascular disease in adult GH-deficiency and its relation to changes in fasting lipid profile and hormone concentrations have not yet been investigated. PATIENTS: We performed a randomised, double-blind placebo-controlled study in 18 patients with adult GH-deficiency before and after 3 months GH replacement therapy (0.036 U/kg/d; GH-treated group: 6 females, 3 males; age: 47.3 +/- 5.4 years., mean +/- SEM; placebo-group: 5 females, 4 males; mean age 50.2 +/- 4.7). In addition, SA concentrations were measured in 18 sex and age matched healthy control subjects. METHODS: Blood samples were obtained after an overnight fast. Serum SA, triglycerides and cholesterol were measured using enzymatic methods. Lipoprotein classes were separated by ultracentrifugation. Insulin and IGF-I were determined by radioimmunoassay, HbA1C was measured by anion exchange liquid chromatography. RESULTS: SA concentrations of the patients with adult GH-deficiency were not significantly different compared to the control group (GH-deficient group: 2.29 +/- 0.02 mmol/l, mean +/- SEM vs. control group: 2.09 +/- 0.13 mmol/l, P = 0.25). Before GH replacement therapy SA concentrations correlated positively with the patients age (r = 0.45; P < 0.04) and fasting insulin concentrations (r = 0.5; P < 0.03) but not with fasting lipid profile. GH replacement therapy significantly increased IGF-I (GH: + 27 +/- 2.6 vs. placebo: + 1.0 +/- 0.8 nmol/l, P < 0.001) and fasting insulin concentrations (GH: + 71.9 +/- 8.0 vs. placebo: + 19.6 +/- 22.6 pmol/l, P < 0.04) compared to placebo therapy. SA concentrations (GH: - 0.41 +/- 0.15 vs. placebo: - 0.01 +/- 0.12 mmol/l, P < 0.05), total cholesterol (GH: - 0.71 +/- 0.16 vs. placebo: 0.23 +/- 0.21 mmol/l, P < 0.003) and LDL-cholesterol (- 0.71 +/- 0.14 vs. placebo: - 0.12 +/- 0.21 mmol/l P < 0.04) significantly decreased after GH replacement therapy compared to placebo therapy. No significant correlation between changes in SA concentrations and changes in lipid profile were observed following GH replacement therapy. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that, firstly, GH replacement therapy may have a beneficial effect on the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis despite the increase in insulin concentrations, a surrogate marker of insulin resistance, secondly, the proposed beneficial effect of GH on the atherosclerotic process is likely to be multifactorial and cannot only be explained by changes in lipid profile and finally, SA might be a useful marker for the process of atherosclerotic disease in interventional studies.

Adult↗

Clinical efficacy and tolerability of extended-release tolterodine and immediate-release oxybutynin in Japanese and Korean patients with an overactive bladder: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare extended-release (ER) tolterodine and immediate-release (IR) oxybutynin with placebo in Japanese and Korean patients with an overactive bladder (OAB). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Men and women aged >or= 20 years with symptoms of urinary urgency, urinary frequency (>or= 8 micturitions/24 h), urge incontinence (>or= 5 episodes/week) and symptoms of OAB for >or= 6 months were randomized to double-blind treatment with tolterodine ER 4 mg once daily, oxybutynin IR 3 mg three times daily or placebo for 12 weeks. Efficacy assessments included changes from baseline in numbers of incontinence episodes per week, voids/24 h and mean volume voided/void. Patient perceptions of bladder condition, urgency and treatment benefit were also assessed. RESULTS: In all, 608 patients were randomized to treatment with tolterodine (240), oxybutynin (246) or placebo (122). More patients prematurely withdrew on oxybutynin (23%) than with tolterodine (10.4%) or placebo (16.4%). After 12 weeks of treatment, the median number of incontinence episodes/week was reduced significantly more in the tolterodine (79%; P= 0.0027) and oxybutynin groups (76.5%; P= 0.0168) than on placebo (46.4%). There were also significantly greater improvements in the number of voids/24 h and volume voided/void with tolterodine and oxybutynin than with placebo. More patients in the tolterodine and oxybutynin than in the placebo groups reported improvements in perceived bladder condition, ability to hold urine and treatment benefit. Patients treated with oxybutynin reported more adverse events than those treated with tolterodine or placebo. Dry mouth was significantly more common with oxybutynin than with tolterodine (53.7% vs. 33.5%; P < 0.001), and occurred in 9.8% of placebo patients. CONCLUSION: Tolterodine ER has similar efficacy but is better tolerated than oxybutynin IR in Japanese and Korean patients with OAB.

Adult↗

Two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies evaluating the S-Caine Peel for induction of local anesthesia before long-pulsed Nd:YAG laser therapy for leg veins.

BACKGROUND: Topical anesthetics are valuable tools for many dermatologic procedures. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of S-Caine Peel composed of 1:1 (wt:wt) mixture of 7% lidocaine and 7% tetracaine in the induction of local anesthesia before long-pulsed Nd:YAG laser therapy for leg veins. METHODS: Two randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trials were performed. In study 1, 60 adults received S-Caine Peel and placebo cream for 30 or 60 minutes. Efficacy was evaluated by a patient visual analog scale and impression. The pain scale and impression were evaluated by the investigator and an independent observer. In study 2, 40 adults received 60- and 90-minute applications. RESULTS: In study 1, the 30- and 60-minute application times were grouped: Patients had adequate pain relief in 48% of S-Caine sites versus 23% of placebo sites (P<0.001). Investigators reported none-to-mild pain in 50% of active sites versus 33% of placebo sites (P=0.007), with adequate anesthesia in 65% of active sites versus 43% of placebo sites (P=0.002). The independent witness assessed none-to-mild pain in 52% of active sites versus 37% of placebo sites (P=0.067). In study 2, investigators rated none-to-mild pain in 75% of 60-minute and 85% of 90-minute S-Caine sites versus 30% and 50% of placebo sites (P=0.012 and P=0.002, respectively), with adequate anesthesia in 70% and 85% of 60- and 90-minute of active sites versus 25% and 20% of placebo sites (P=0.029 and P=0.001, respectively). The independent witness rated none to mild pain in 80% and 85% of 60 and 90 minute of S-Caine sites versus 35% and 50% of placebo sites (P=0.008 and P=0.004). CONCLUSION: The S-Caine Peel provides safe and highly effective local anesthesia when applied for at least 60 minutes for laser therapy of leg veins. Facile removal of the peel provides a unique advantage and ease in administration.

Administration, Topical↗

Naratriptan as short-term prophylaxis of menstrually associated migraine: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of naratriptan 1-mg and 2.5-mg tablets twice daily compared with placebo as short-term prophylaxis of menstrually associated migraine. BACKGROUND: Approximately 60% of women with migraine report headaches associated with their menstrual cycles. Results from an open-label study suggest that short-term administration of sumatriptan is useful in the prophylaxis of menstrually associated migraine. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, three-arm, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study was conducted in women aged 18 years or older with a history of migraine with or without aura, as defined by the International Headache Society, of at least 6 months. Two dose strengths of naratriptan (1 mg, 2.5 mg) or identical-appearing placebo tablets (1:1:1) were administered twice daily for 5 days starting 2 days prior to the expected onset of menses across four perimenstrual periods. End points included the number of menstrually associated migraines, total migraine days, peak headache severity, lost work/activity time, migraine-related quality of life, and incidence of adverse events. RESULTS: Overall, the intent-to-treat population comprised 206 women (naratriptan 1 mg, n = 70; naratriptan 2.5 mg, n = 70, and placebo, n = 66); 171 women treated four perimenstrual periods. Significantly more perimenstrual periods per subject treated with naratriptan, 1 mg, were headache-free compared with placebo (50% versus 25%, P =.003). Naratriptan, 1 mg, significantly reduced the number of menstrually associated migraines (2.0 versus 4.0, P <.05) and menstrually associated migraine days (4.2 versus 7.0, P <.01) compared with placebo. More patients treated with naratriptan, 1 mg, were headache-free across all treated perimenstrual periods compared with placebo (23% versus 8%). No difference in headache severity was observed in breakthrough headaches. The incidence and severity of adverse events was similar across treatment groups. Naratriptan, 2.5 mg, was not statistically superior to placebo for any measure. CONCLUSIONS: Naratriptan, 1 mg, with tolerability similar to placebo, is an effective, short-term, prophylactic treatment for menstrually associated migraine.

Adult↗

Almotriptan increases pain-free status in patients with acute migraine treated in placebo-controlled clinical trials.

OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the efficacy of a single oral dose of almotriptan in achieving pain-free status during treatment of acute migraine attacks. METHODS: This pooled analysis (N=1321) used data from two randomized, placebo-controlled, phase III trials (studies A and B) to determine the proportion of patients with migraine achieving pain-free status 2 hours after a single oral dose of study medication (almotriptan or placebo). Pain was assessed using a 4-point integer scale (0=no headache, 3=severe headache), and recorded in a patient self-assessment booklet. RESULTS: The proportion of patients pain-free at 2 hours after study medication was significantly greater with almotriptan 6.25 mg (both studies P<or=.002) and almotriptan 12.5 mg (both studies P<or=.001) than with placebo. In study A, 11.6% of patients taking almotriptan 12.5 mg versus 2.5% of patients receiving placebo were pain-free at 1 hour (P=.016). At 1.5 hours, 26.8% of patients taking almotriptan 12.5 mg versus 8.8% receiving placebo (P=.001) were pain-free, and at 2 hours, 38.4% on almotriptan versus 11.3% on placebo were pain-free (P<.001). In study B, 23.8% of patients taking almotriptan 12.5 mg were free from pain at 1.5 hours versus 10.2% receiving placebo (P<.001). At 2 hours, 39.2% taking almotriptan 12.5 mg versus 15.3% receiving placebo were pain-free (P<.001). Increases in pain-free status with almotriptan generally occurred in a dose-dependent manner. CONCLUSION: Compared with placebo, almotriptan 12.5 mg significantly increases the proportion of patients who are pain-free by as early as 1 hour, and consistently by 1.5 hours, after a single dose.

Acute Disease↗

A randomized, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy of 12-month famciclovir treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis B e antigen-positive hepatitis B.

We conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical study evaluating famciclovir (500 mg 3 times daily and 1.5 g once daily) for 1 year (6 months post-treatment follow-up) in patients with chronic hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. The study was conducted in 80 centers in North America, Europe, and Australia/New Zealand. A total of 417 patients with histologically documented chronic hepatitis B (histologic activity index [HAI] 9.5-11.0) received famciclovir (500 mg 3 times daily or 1.5 g once daily) or placebo. Famciclovir 500 mg 3 times daily significantly reduced HBV DNA and median HAI scores versus placebo. By week 8, median HBV DNA decreased from 1,645 to 283 MEq/mL (famciclovir 500 mg 3 times daily) and from 1,147 to 304 MEq/mL (famciclovir 1.5 g once daily), while increasing for placebo (1,617 to 1,685 MEq/mL). Median change in HBV DNA at the end of therapy was -76% (famciclovir 500 mg 3 times daily; P <.01) and -60% (famciclovir 1.5 g once daily; P =.25) versus -37% for placebo. Median change in HAI was -1.5 points (famciclovir 500 mg 3 times daily; P =.02) and -1.0 point (famciclovir 1.5 g once daily; P =.35) and zero for placebo. Fifty percent of patients receiving famciclovir 500 mg 3 times daily (P =.07) and 43% receiving 1.5 g once daily (P =.41) experienced >/=2 points improvement in HAI versus 37% for placebo. Nine percent of patients treated with famciclovir 500 mg 3 times daily underwent anti-HBeAg seroconversion with undetectable HBV DNA at end of follow-up versus 3% in the placebo group (P =.05). Famciclovir was well tolerated; the incidence of post-treatment alanine transaminase (ALT) elevations was comparable with placebo. In conclusion, famciclovir 500 mg 3 times daily gave modest suppression of viral replication, but translated into significant histologic improvement in median HAI score at 1 year.

2-Aminopurine↗

The treatment of severe premenstrual syndrome with goserelin with and without 'add-back' estrogen therapy: a placebo-controlled study.

The study aimed to determine if the addition of daily low-dose oral estrogen with a cyclical progestogen given to young women using a depot gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analog implant for the treatment of their premenstrual syndrome (PMS) would affect the clinical outcome. In a double-blind placebo-controlled study in a specialist premenstrual syndrome clinic setting, 60 women aged between 20 and 45 years were randomized to one of three treatment groups: Group A (placebo implant four weekly + placebo tablets daily), Group B (goserelin 3.6 mg implant four weekly + estradiol valerate 2 mg daily with norethisterone 5 mg from days 21-28 of a 28-day cycle) or Group C (goserelin 3.6 mg implant four weekly + placebo tablets daily). Differences between PMS scores at 2, 4 and 6 months were compared with pretreatment values. There was a significant improvement in PMS scores in Group C (Zoladex + placebo) after 2, 4 and 6 months of treatment when compared to pretreatment values and Group A (placebo + placebo). The addition of a low-dose oral estrogen with a cyclical progestogen to GnRH analog treatment (Group B) resulted in a less dramatic response when compared to pretreatment values and no significant improvement when compared to Group A (placebo + placebo) at 2, 4 and 6 months of treatment. The addition of a low-dose oral estrogen with a cyclical progestogen to depot GnRH analog therapy in the treatment of PMS reduces the clinical response.

Administration, Oral↗

A double-blind, placebo-controlled withdrawal trial of dexmethylphenidate hydrochloride in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

OBJECTIVES: d,l-threo-methylphenidate HCl (D,L-MPH) is the most common treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). A previous report showed placebo-controlled efficacy for the purified d-isomer (dexmethylphenidate hydrochloride, d-MPH, Focalin) with a 2:1 potency compared to dl, and suggested a 6-hour duration of action. This study complements that report by studying the effect of placebo-controlled discontinuation and retesting the duration of action. METHODS: A 6-week, open-label titration of d-MPH (2.5-10 mg twice-a-day) was followed by a double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2-week withdrawal study of responders. RESULTS: In the open titration, 82% of the 89 enrolled patients achieved a Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) rating of much or very much improved. Only 5 patients discontinued for adverse events. Seventy-five patients continued into the placebo-controlled discontinuation. For the randomly assigned d-MPH (n=35) and placebo (n=40) groups, mean ages, respectively, were 10.1 +/- 2.9 and 9.9 +/- 2.7 years, 86% and 78% were male, and 70.6% and 80.0% took the ceiling dose of 10 mg twice-daily, respectively. Each group had 80% combined type ADHD and 20% inattentive type. By the end of the 2-week, placebo-masked withdrawal, significantly more placebo patients (24 of 39) than d-MPH continuers (6 of 35) relapsed (61.5% versus 17.1%, p=0.001). Compared to d-MPH continuers, placebo patients deteriorated significantly more in the 2-week period on teacher ratings of the 18 ADHD symptoms rated 0-3 (p=0.028), the 3 p.m. and 6 p.m. parent ADHD symptom ratings (p=0.0026 and p=0.0381, respectively), and clinic (2-3 p.m.) and home (6 p.m.) Math Tests (p=0.024 and p<0.0001, respectively). The 6 p.m. scores replicated the significant effect at 6 hours reported in the previous study. CONCLUSIONS: d-MPH is safe, tolerable, and effective, with a 6-hour duration of effect suggested by the significant difference from placebo at 6 hours on a double-blind discontinuation.

Adolescent↗

Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy in multifocal motor neuropathy: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled, study of 19 patients fulfilling eligibility criteria for multifocal motor neuropathy with persistent conduction block. They were enrolled and divided into two groups: those who had never been treated previously with intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) (Group 1: 10 patients) and those who presented recurrent symptoms after previously successful treatment with IVIg (Group 2: nine patients). They were randomized prospectively to receive either IVIg or placebo at a dose of 500 mg/kg/day for 5 consecutive days, once a month for 3 months. At month 4, patients found to be responders remained on the same treatment for the 3 following months, while non-responders were switched to the alternative study drug for the 3 following months. Clinical assessment was conducted with the MRC score in 28 muscles and a self-evaluation scale (five daily motor activities scored from 0 to 5). In Group 1, nine patients completed the study, of whom initially four received IVIg and five placebo; four patients responded to IVIg (two at months 4 and 7, and a further two at month 7 after switching treatment at month 4), two patients responded to placebo at months 4 and 7, and three patients did not respond to either treatment. In Group 2, nine patients completed the study. Five patients first received IVIg and all responded at months 4 and 7. Four patients first received placebo and none responded at month 4; all were then switched to IVIg and three responded at month 7. When the 18 patients were considered together, seven out of the nine patients who received IVIg first were responders at month 4, compared with two of the nine patients who received placebo first, a difference that was statistically significant (P = 0.03). On the other hand, there was no significant difference in MRC score but a significant difference in the self-evaluation score, at month 4, between IVIg patients and placebo patients. Electrophysiological studies did not show significant differences at month 4 in motor parameters between IVIg patients and placebo patients. IgM anti-GM1 titres did not change significantly in patients treated with IVIg compared with those who received placebo, between baseline, month 4 and month 7. However, of five patients who had significantly high anti-GM1 titres (>3200) at baseline, four responded to IVIg. This trial confirms that IVIg is a promising therapeutic option for multifocal motor neuropathy.

Adult↗

Short-term self-treatment of travellers' diarrhoea with norfloxacin: a placebo-controlled study.

In a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial, 447 travellers to Africa, Asia or Latin America started three days treatment with norfloxacin 400 mg bd or placebo within 24 h after the onset of travellers' diarrhoea. One hundred and four subjects developed diarrhoea and of those 94 (46 in the norfloxacin group and 48 in the placebo group) could be analysed for efficacy. By the last treatment day, 34 patients in the norfloxacin and 18 in the placebo group were cured (P = 0.0001), four and three improved and five and 19, respectively, were failures. Recurrences were seen in three patients on norfloxacin and eight on placebo. The mean time to cure was 3.2 days in the norfloxacin group and 4.4 days in the placebo group (P less than 0.005). The number of loose stools was significantly lower in the norfloxacin group. Nine adverse events were reported; seven in the placebo and two in the norfloxacin group. Pre- and post-travel faecal samples were studied in 19 patients treated with norfloxacin, 21 treated with placebo and 21 untreated subjects without diarrhoea. In treated subjects, increased frequencies of Escherichia coli resistant to ampicillin, co-trimoxazole, doxycycline and chloramphenicol were found in both groups, though more frequently in the placebo one. No subject had norfloxacin resistant Esch. coli pre- and post-travel.

Adolescent↗

A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of zoledronic acid in patients with hormone-refractory metastatic prostate carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Bone metastases are a common cause of morbidity in patients with prostate carcinoma. We studied the effect of a new bisphosphonate, zoledronic acid, which blocks bone destruction, on skeletal complications in prostate cancer patients with bone metastases. METHODS: Patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer and a history of bone metastases were randomly assigned to a double-blind treatment regimen of intravenous zoledronic acid at 4 mg (N = 214), zoledronic acid at 8 mg (subsequently reduced to 4 mg; 8/4) (N = 221), or placebo (N = 208) every 3 weeks for 15 months. Proportions of patients with skeletal-related events, time to the first skeletal-related event, skeletal morbidity rate, pain and analgesic scores, disease progression, and safety were assessed. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Approximately 38% of patients who received zoledronic acid at 4 mg, 28% who received zoledronic acid at 8/4 mg, and 31% who received placebo completed the study. A greater proportion of patients who received placebo had skeletal-related events than those who received zoledronic acid at 4 mg (44.2% versus 33.2%; difference = -11.0%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -20.3% to -1.8%; P =.021) or those who received zoledronic acid at 8/4 mg (38.5%; difference versus placebo = -5.8%, 95% CI = -15.1% to 3.6%; P =.222). Median time to first skeletal-related event was 321 days for patients who received placebo, was not reached for patients who received zoledronic acid at 4 mg (P =.011 versus placebo), and was 363 days for those who received zoledronic acid at 8/4 mg (P =.491 versus placebo). Compared with urinary markers in patients who received placebo, urinary markers of bone resorption were statistically significantly decreased in patients who received zoledronic acid at either dose (P =.001). Pain and analgesic scores increased more in patients who received placebo than in patients who received zoledronic acid, but there were no differences in disease progression, performance status, or quality-of-life scores among the groups. Zoledronic acid at 4 mg given as a 15-minute infusion was well tolerated, but the 8-mg dose was associated with renal function deterioration. CONCLUSION: Zoledronic acid at 4 mg reduced skeletal-related events in prostate cancer patients with bone metastases.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Comparison of two hyaluronan drugs and placebo in patients with knee osteoarthritis. A controlled, randomized, double-blind, parallel-design multicentre study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of intra-articular injections of two different hyaluronan preparations and placebo in patients with knee osteoarthritis. METHODS: In a randomized, patient- and observer-blind, placebo-controlled and multicentre trial with parallel groups, 210 patients, aged 60 yr or above, with knee osteoarthritis were included in a per protocol analysis. The patients were treated with three injections, once weekly, of either native high-molecular-weight hyaluronan (Artzal((R))) or cross-linked hyaluronan (Synvisc((R))) or with placebo and were followed for 52 weeks. The primary efficacy measures were weight-bearing pain during study weeks 0-26 and the duration of clinical benefit measured with Kaplan-Meier survival analysis for weeks 0-52. The secondary outcome measures were resting and maximum pain, Lequesne index, WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index) and SF-36 (Medical Outcomes Study Short Form Health Survey) scores. RESULTS: The intra-articular injections produced a significant reduction in weight-bearing pain, resting pain, maximum pain and Lequesne and WOMAC scores after 26 weeks. There were no significant differences in outcome between any of the three study groups during the first 26 weeks. In direct comparison against placebo for weeks 0-52, neither hyaluronan treatment (Artzal or Synvisc) showed a significantly longer duration of clinical benefit than placebo. However, when data for the two hyaluronan-treated groups were pooled, treatment with hyaluronan had a significantly longer duration of benefit compared with placebo (P = 0.047). CONCLUSION: Patients with knee osteoarthritis who were treated by injection into the knee of either of two hyaluronan preparations or placebo showed clinical improvement during the first 26 weeks of treatment, though neither hyaluronan preparation gave a longer duration of clinical benefit than placebo. However, when data for the two hyaluronan treatments were pooled, there was a significantly longer duration of clinical benefit for hyaluronan treatment than for placebo.

Aged↗

New insights into placebo analgesia.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The placebo effect is a widespread phenomenon in medicine, both in clinical trials and in routine medical practice. Most of our knowledge about the underlying psychological and physiological mechanisms comes from the study of placebo analgesia. RECENT FINDINGS: When the correct methodological approach is used, striking placebo effects can be detected and these can be mediated by conscious anticipatory processes or unconscious conditioning mechanisms. However, it should be stressed that many improvements observed after the administration of a placebo are not real placebo effects, but different phenomena such as spontaneous remission, regression to the mean and symptom detection ambiguity. Both neuropharmacological studies and brain imaging investigations show that placebo analgesia is mediated by endogenous opioids. Moreover, we also know that during placebo analgesia other systems change their functions, like the respiratory centres and the cardiovascular system. The placebo effect has also been approached from a different perspective by administering analgesics covertly. The results show that hidden medical treatments are less effective than open ones. SUMMARY: The understanding of the placebo effect may lead to better design of clinical trials and better medical practice. For example, it can be used in therapeutic protocols aimed at reducing drug intake.

Journal Article↗

Long-term treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder after an acute response: a comparison of fluoxetine versus placebo.

Few controlled studies have evaluated the long-term continuation of pharmacotherapy for relapse prevention in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). This study assessed efficacy and safety of fluoxetine versus placebo in preventing relapse of OCD during a 52-week period in responders to short-term administration of fluoxetine. Patients who met DSM-IV criteria for OCD and had a Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale score > or = 19 were treated with single-blind fluoxetine 20, 40, or 60 mg/day (based on physician assessment of response and tolerability). After 20 weeks, responders were randomly assigned to receive continued treatment with fluoxetine or placebo and were monitored for relapse for up to 52 weeks. Of 130 patients who entered the study, 71 (55%) were randomly assigned to receive fluoxetine (N = 36) or placebo (N = 35). Patients who received fluoxetine had numerically lower relapse rates compared with those who received placebo, although the difference was not significant (Kaplan-Meier 1-year relapse rates: fluoxetine, 20.6%; placebo, 31.9%; one-tailed p value = 0.137). In additional analyses evaluating patients on the basis of fluoxetine dose at randomization, patients who continued treatment with fluoxetine 60 mg/day (N = 52) had significantly lower rates of relapse than those who were switched to placebo (Kaplan-Meier 1-year relapse rates: fluoxetine, 17.5%; placebo, 38.0%; one-tailed p value = 0.041). Those who responded to the acute treatment phase with 40 (N = 18) or 20 (N = 1) mg/day had low overall rates of relapse, and the difference between continued fluoxetine and placebo treatment for these patients was not significant. For responders to the 60 mg/day dosage, those patients who continued treatment with fluoxetine were provided greater protection against relapse than those patients switched to placebo.

Adolescent↗

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of once-weekly subcutaneous epoetin alfa in critically ill patients: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the erythropoietin pharmacokinetic profile after once-weekly epoetin alfa treatment in critically ill patients. Secondary objectives were to compare pharmacodynamic and safety profiles between active treatment and placebo in these patients. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. SETTING: Medical, surgical, or mixed medical/surgical intensive care units. PATIENTS: A total of 73 anemic critically ill adults with an expected stay of >3 days and a hematocrit value of <38%. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized 2:1 to epoetin alfa, 40,000 IU, administered subcutaneously once weekly (n=48) or matching placebo (n=25) for up to 4 wks. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Serum erythropoietin concentration and hematologic variables (percentage reticulocytes [RETI], hemoglobin [Hb], and total red blood cell [RBC] counts) were measured, and area under the serum concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last blood sampling time at time t (t: 120, 144, or 168 hrs) postdose (AUC0-Tlast) for these three variables was determined. Mean serum erythropoietin concentrations in placebo patients were slightly higher than typical physiologic levels of erythropoietin in healthy subjects, although not appropriate for the degree of anemia in these patients. Overall, exposure of endogenous erythropoietin in the placebo group (in terms of AUC0-Tlast) was only about 20% of exposure to exogenous erythropoietin in the epoetin alfa group. Baseline hemoglobin levels were the same in both groups (9.9 g/dL). Mean change in hemoglobin level from baseline through day 29 was 1.9 g/dL and 1.6 g/dL in the epoetin alfa and placebo groups, respectively. Mean AUC(RETI)0-Tlast was higher with epoetin alfa than with placebo and was related to the AUC of erythropoietin. There were no apparent differences in AUC(Hb)0-Tlast and AUC(RBC)0-Tlast between epoetin alfa and placebo groups, which was most likely due to bleeding and transfusion events. Epoetin alfa was safe and well tolerated, with a rate of treatment-emergent complications similar to that seen with placebo. CONCLUSION: Epoetin alfa, once weekly, augmented the erythropoietic response in critically ill patients as indicated by the increased erythropoietin levels and larger AUC(RETI)0-Tlast in treated patients.

Adolescent↗

&#x3b2;1- and &#x3b2;2-adrenergic Receptor Haplotypes Regulate Therapeutic Responses to Placebo and the Biased Ligand &#x3b2;-blocker Bucindolol.

BACKGROUND: ADRB1 and ADRB2, encoding cardiac myocyte &#x3b2;1- and &#x3b2;2-adrenergic receptors (ARs) that mediate pathologic myocardial remodeling in response to chronically increased signaling, contain N-terminus haplotype variants capable of influencing agonist- or biased ligand-induced receptor internalization that uncouples canonical signaling and initiates EGFR/ERK1/2 cardioprotection. METHODS: In two heart failure (HF) clinical trial genetic substudies we investigated effects of internalizing vs. internalization-resistant ADRB1/ADRB2 haplotypes on clinical or biomarker responses to the biased ligand &#x3b2;-blocker bucindolol vs. placebo or vs. the nonbiased &#x3b2;1-antagonist metoprolol, and in haplotyped isolated human heart preparations we measured ERK1/2 activation in response to these same interventions. RESULTS: In subjects with &#x2265;3 internalizing ADRB1+ADRB2 haplotypes (6.7% subcohort) placebo treatment was associated with fewer clinical events compared to subjects with internalization-resistant haplotypes (Odds Ratio (OR) 0.28, 95% CI (0.10, 0.82)). In contrast, placebo treatment in subjects with &#x2265;3 internalization-resistant haplotypes (70% subcohort) was associated with more clinical events in comparison to subjects with internalizing haplotype counterparts (OR 1.64 (1.46, 1.84)). Bucindolol treatment was equal to placebo in the &#x2265;3 internalizing subcohort, but was superior to placebo in the internalization-resistant subcohort (bucindolol vs. placebo OR 0.49 (0.41, 0.58)). In subjects with all 4 haplotypes internalization-resistant (25% subcohort), bucindolol vs. placebo reduced time to first event rates by 62.3&#xb1;17.5% (P <0.01, 1.68&#xb1;0.34 fold > the all-haplotypes parent population and additive to 1.92&#xb1;0.58 fold when the ADRB1 haplotype contained Arg389 rather than Gly389). The same bucindolol vs. placebo pattern was observed for NT-proBNP or norepinephrine reduction vs. metoprolol. In these comparisons ADRB2 and ADRB1 haplotypes behaved similarly, and although the haplotypes differed in frequency between Black and non-Black subjects, within haplotypes there were no by-race differences in therapeutic effects. Bucindolol but not metoprolol activated ERK1/2 signaling in isolated ventricular preparations with &#x2265;3 internalization-resistant haplotypes. CONCLUSIONS: 1) Both &#x3b2;1- and &#x3b2;2-AR haplotypes regulate therapeutic responses in HF; internalizing species confer protection against clinical events in placebo-treated subjects, while in internalization-resistant haplotypes the biased ligand &#x3b2;-blocker bucindolol but not the non-biased ligand metoprolol is associated with favorable effects. 2) The biased ligand cardioprotective effect may be related to internalization-dependent or -independent ERK1/2 activation.

Beta Adrenergic Receptors↗