Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “MASTECTOMY”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 487 records · Page 27Linked to original sources

The role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in women undergoing prophylactic mastectomy.

BACKGROUND: Indications for prophylactic mastectomy (PM) range from LCIS to BRCA 1-2 positive, cosmesis, and cancer phobia. Occult cancers have been found in up to 5% of PM cases. Consequently, consideration must be given to the role of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy as a diagnostic procedure in these patients as PM excludes the subsequent option of SLN biopsy. METHODS: From April 1994 to November 1999, all patients undergoing PM had SLN biopsy after four quadrant periareolar injections of radiocolloid (450 mci) and blue dye (5 cc). All patients were prospectively accrued to the computerized database of breast patients. The SLN were all evaluated with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) as well as CAM5.2 cytokeratin immunohistochemical (CK-IHC) stains. RESULTS: Over a 67-month period, 1,356 patients were mapped; 57 patients underwent PM in which 148 nodes (2.6 nodes per patient) were evaluated. Nodes were examined by routine H&E and CK-IHC staining. Two patients, neither of whom was found to have a cancer in the prophylactic mastectomy breast, were found to have a positive SLN by CK-IHC staining. Infiltrating carcinoma was discovered within the PM breasts of 2 additional patients. Sentinel lymph node biopsy was negative for malignancy by H&E as well as CK-IHC stains. No lymphedema has been detected in PM patients. CONCLUSIONS: Sentinel node biopsy has been shown to be an accurate and minimally invasive method of evaluating the lymphatic basin. This study shows that the absence of known disease within the breast does not preclude the presence of occult cancer or metastatic nodal disease. Four patients (7%) had a significant change in their surgical management as a direct result of sentinel lymph node biopsy. Two patients were spared the complications of a complete axillary node dissection. This minimally invasive procedure accurately evaluated the known disease status and provided new diagnostic information. Most important, once a mastectomy is performed, the opportunity for SLN biopsy is lost should a cancer be found within the breast specimen.

Adult↗

Perspective on reconstruction after mastectomy.

BACKGROUND: We sought to evaluate the factors influencing our patients to receive or forego reconstruction after mastectomy and their subsequent satisfaction with their decision. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to 819 patients who underwent mastectomy from 1994 to 1998 in a community-based health system. RESULTS: Response rate was 50% (408 of 819). Overall, 92% (n = 243) of women who did not have reconstruction and 89% (n = 152) of women who did proceed with reconstruction were happy with their decision. Fifty-five (17%) respondents were not offered reconstruction. For this group, age was a significant factor as 64% of them were 60 years or older (P < 0.0001). Dissatisfied patients were disappointed with their cosmetic, sensory, or functional outcome. Their result did not meet their expectations. There were no significant differences noted on the basis of marital status. CONCLUSION: Ninety percent of patients adjust well to mastectomy whether or not they receive reconstruction if they make informed decisions with realistic expectations. Surgeons should offer reconstruction to women of all ages although patients over 60 years old are less likely to proceed with, and complete, reconstruction.

Adult↗

Ambulatory mastectomy.

BACKGROUND: Ambulatory mastectomy has been a topic of heated political debate with little analysis of clinical data. METHODS: Based on extensive satisfaction surveys, an ideal surgical treatment experience was developed that decreased nausea, increased preoperative education, and reduced perioperative narcotic usage. Using this new algorithm, patients treated by a single surgeon were given the choice of overnight stay versus discharge to home with visiting nurse care. RESULTS: From March 1 to October 31, 2001, 92 mastectomies or lumpectomy/axillary dissections were performed in 87 patients. One patient chose to remain in the center overnight. All others were discharged in less than 2.5 hours postoperatively. Perioperative complications fell to 20% of those of the prior year. Hospital charges fell 79.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Despite lay reservations about ambulatory mastectomy, a detailed approach can result in markedly reduced health care costs without incurring additional morbidity or mortality.

Adult↗

Surgical technique and pitfalls of breast reconstruction immediately after mastectomy for carcinoma: initial experience.

Breast reconstruction immediately after mastectomy is being used with increasing frequency. In a study of the first 100 consecutive patients at our institution who underwent this procedure, with (21 patients) or without (79 patients) later nipple reconstruction, 85% responded affirmatively on a follow-up questionnaire when asked whether they would recommend the procedure to other patients. Moreover, 32% rated their cosmetic results as "perfect." No deaths occurred in the immediate postoperative period, but 13 patients had major complications--most commonly, wound infection or displacement or partial extrusion of the implant. All infections, however, occurred early in the study, and with increasing experience and improved selection of patients, the associated morbidity decreased. For the entire group, the mean duration of hospitalization was 7.8 days, similar to that for patients who undergo mastectomy without reconstruction (7.5 days). The high patient acceptance and the overall good results in this preliminary study support the use of breast reconstruction immediately after mastectomy.

Adult↗

The current role of prophylactic mastectomy.

Prophylactic mastectomy has a role in preventing breast cancer in the woman at high risk. The rare indications for this operation are based on genetic and histologic factors that affect relative or cumulative risk. Evaluation of women at high risk must draw on multidisciplinary expertise, including genetic counseling. If prophylactic mastectomy is recommended, skin-sparing total mastectomy (not subcutaneous) with autogenous tissue reconstruction is the preferred approach.

BRCA1 Protein↗

Post-mastectomy radiation in male breast cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Previous studies of male breast cancer have suggested that due to the lack of breast tissue, post-mastectomy radiation should be routinely utilized in all stages of this disease. We propose that the pattern of local recurrence in male breast cancer is, stage for stage, similar to female breast cancer and, therefore, the indications for post-mastectomy radiation should be similar. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 44 cases of male breast cancer from 1967 to 1995. Primary therapy was surgical in all cases and 13 patients received postoperative radiation. RESULTS: Tumor, Nodal, Metastasis (TNM) classification revealed 34 Stages I/II and ten Stage III cases. The 5-year overall survival was 75% and the 5-year local recurrence free survival was 70% for the entire group. In patients with Stages I/II disease, 28/34 underwent surgery alone, of whom, at 5-year follow up, only one suffered an isolated local-regional recurrence (3.5%) and one distant failure (3.5%). Of the ten patients with Stage III disease, three underwent surgery alone and none suffered a local failure. While the crude rate of local recurrence (local recurrence at any time in relation to distant failure) for all patients as a whole was 11%, the isolated local recurrence rate (before distant failure) was seen in only 6%, and only 3% amongst those with Stages I/II disease treated with surgery alone. CONCLUSION: Although postoperative radiation is often routinely utilized in all stages of male breast cancer to help decrease the risk of local recurrence, this review suggests that this risk is small, especially in early stage disease, and, therefore, the same indications for post-mastectomy radiation that apply to female breast cancer, should be utilized in males.

Aged↗

Recursive partitioning analysis of locoregional recurrence patterns following mastectomy: implications for adjuvant irradiation.

PURPOSE: Postmastectomy irradiation improves overall survival for breast cancer patients at high risk for locoregional recurrence (LRR). The objective of this study was to use recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) to define patient subgroups at high risk for LRR following mastectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cohort of 1031 patients treated on prospective trials with mastectomy and doxorubicin-based chemotherapy without irradiation was analyzed. The variables considered in the RPA were tumor size, number of involved nodes, number of nodes examined, and percentage of nodes involved (nodes involved/nodes examined). The endpoint was LRR +/- distant metastasis. Only patients with complete data were analyzed (n = 913). Median follow-up was 8 years (range, 0.7-22 years). RESULTS: Involvement of 20% or more of the lymph nodes examined was the most significant variable predicting LRR. Three risk categories were defined. Patients with 20% or more involved nodes and tumors of 3.5 cm or more were at greatest risk for LRR (41% at 8 years). An intermediate-risk group included patients with 20% or more involved nodes and tumors of less than 3.5 cm as well as those with less than 20% involved nodes and tumor size of 5 cm or greater (18% at 8 years). Patients with less than 20% involved nodes and tumor size of less than 5 cm were at lowest risk for LRR (10% at 8 years). CONCLUSION: Tumor size and extent of nodal involvement play interrelated roles in predicting LRR following mastectomy and systemic therapy. Patients with 20% or greater involved nodes and those with less than 20% nodes and tumors of 5.0 cm or greater are at significant risk of LRR and should be considered for postoperative irradiation.

Adult↗

Locoregional recurrence of breast cancer following mastectomy: always a fatal event? Results of univariate and multivariate analysis.

PURPOSE: The outcome of patients with local-regional breast cancer recurrence after mastectomy often is described as fatal. However, certain subgroups with favorable prognoses are thought to exist. To determine these favorable subgroups, we analyzed prognostic factors for their influence on postrecurrence survival by univariate and multivariate analysis. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1979 and 1992, 145 patients with their first isolated locoregional recurrence of breast cancer following modified radical mastectomy without evidence of distant metastases were treated at the Department of Radiation Oncology of the University of Wurzburg. Thirty-nine percent of patients (n = 67) had had postmastectomy radiotherapy, representing 7% of patients who had received routine postmastectomy irradiation at our institution. Systemic adjuvant hormonal therapy had been applied in 24% and systemic chemotherapy in 19% of patients. Several combinations were used. Treatment of recurrences consisted of surgical tumor excision in 74%, megavoltage irradiation in 83%, additional hormonal therapy in 41%, and chemotherapy in 12% of patients, employing different combinations. Local control in the recurrent site was achieved in 86%. Median follow-up for patients alive at the time of analysis was 8.9 years after recurrence. We tested different prognostic factors, including prior treatment and treatment of recurrence, for their influence on postrecurrence survival, using univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Eighty-two of the 145 patients (57%) developed distant metastases within the follow-up period. Metastases-free rate was 42% at 2 years and 36% at 10 years following recurrence. With development of distant metastases, the survival rate deteriorated. Recurrences appeared within the first 2 years from primary surgery in 56% of patients, and in 89% within 5 years. Overall, 2-year and 5-year survival rates following local-regional recurrence were 67% and 42%, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed statistically significant worsening of survival rates for pT3 + 4 primary tumors, primary axillary lymph node involvement, tumor grading 3 + 4, lymphatic vessel invasion, blood vessel invasion, tumor necrosis, negative estrogen (ER) and progesterone (PR) hormonal receptor status, postmastectomy chemotherapy and hormonal therapy, short time to recurrence (< 1 year), combined recurrences and supraclavicular site of recurrence, non-scar recurrence, size of the largest recurrent nodule > 5 cm, multiple recurrent nodules, no surgical excision of recurrence, small target volume of irradiation, chemotherapy for recurrence, and no local control within the recurrence site. The 2-year and 5-year survival rates ranged from 68% to 94%, and from 33% to 65%, respectively, in the favorable subgroups compared to 2-year and 5-year survival rates ranging from 20% to 59% and 0% to 35%, respectively, in the unfavorable subgroups. Multivariate analysis showed that site of recurrence and number of recurrent nodules have the strongest influence on postrecurrence survival, but time to recurrence, age at time of recurrence, local control in recurrent site as well as primary pT and axillary status, and the presence of tumor necrosis in the primary tumor specimen showed additional independent influences on survival. Thus, we identified a highly favorable subgroup of patients with a single chest wall or axillary recurrent nodule (in a patient aged > 50 years), a disease-free interval of > or = 1 year, pT1-2N0 primary tumor, and without tumor necrosis, and whose recurrence is locally controlled. This group (12 patients) had 5- and 10-year survival rates of 100% and 69%, respectively. CONCLUSION: We conclude that locoregional recurrence of breast cancer following mastectomy is not always a sign of systemic disease. Our data support previous findings, that subgroups with favorable prognosis exist and they still have a chance for cure, demanding comprehensive local treatment. (ABSTR

Analysis of Variance↗

Argon-enhanced cutting and coagulation confers advantages over conventional electrocautery for mastectomy.

In this prospective randomized study we have compared argon-enhanced electrosurgery with conventional diathermy in a consecutive series of 50 patients undergoing mastectomy. The groups were comparable in age, menopausal status, tumour size, stage and specimen size. Patients undergoing mastectomy using argon diathermy had significantly less blood loss intraoperatively (521 (67)ml vs 824 (59)ml; P<0.001) and a significantly lower transfusion requirement post-operatively. There were no significant differences in post-operative drainage (1350 (160) ml vs 1527 (169) ml; P=NS), length of hospital stay, incidence of seromas or other complications. Argon diathermy significantly reduces intraoperative blood loss and should be considered as the method of choice in patients undergoing mastectomy.

Argon↗

Immediate reconstruction after complete skin-sparing mastectomy with autologous tissue.

BACKGROUND: Immediate breast reconstruction with autologous tissue can re-create a breast mound that closely resembles the native breast in shape and consistency. Results are limited by scarring and color differences between flap and native breast skin. This study reviews all patients undergoing complete skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate autologous tissue reconstruction over the past 4 years. STUDY DESIGN: Twenty-eight patients with a mean age of 43 years (range, 32-53 years) were retrospectively reviewed. Requirements for the complete skin-sparing approach included a favorable biopsy scar location, adequate areolar diameter, and suitable donor site for autologous tissue reconstruction. Ninety-two percent of patients were reconstructed with a transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap. RESULTS: There were no instances of flap loss or local recurrence during the followup period (mean, 27 months; range, 14-48 months). Complications at the reconstruction site were minor and limited to cellulitis, periareolar skin loss, and the need for repeat skin excision because of a very close pathologic margin. Donor site complications were seen in five patients. Aesthetic results were judged as excellent or good in 75% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Complete skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate autologous tissue reconstruction has enhanced immediate breast reconstruction by reducing scar burden and eliminating color differences without an increased incidence of local recurrence. This procedure is limited by appropriate patient selection and technical expertise in performing the mastectomy.

Adult↗

Double-peaked time distribution of mortality for breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy.

PURPOSE: To gather information on the natural history of breast cancer from the time-distribution of deaths of patients undergoing mastectomy alone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 1173 patients, who entered controlled clinical trials carried out at the Milan Cancer Institute and underwent radical or modified radical mastectomy without any adjuvant therapy for operable breast cancer, were examined. The risk of death at a given time after surgery was studied utilizing the death-specific hazard rate. The risk distribution was assessed relative to tumor size, axillary lymph node involvement, and menopausal status. RESULTS: The hazard rate for death presented an early peak at about the 3rd-4th year after surgery and a second late peak near the 8th year. The double-peaked pattern was almost completely generated by N+ patients, while N- patients did not show relevant structures. Pre-menopausal patients showed an initial mortality wave covering about 6 years, with maximum height at the 4th year, followed by a peak 8 years after surgery, while post-menopausal patients showed an early high mortality surge peaking at the 3rd year, followed by a modest increase at the 8th year. Detailed analysis revealed that post-menopausal patients with early mortality had significantly larger tumors and higher nodal involvement, while no special trait characterized the corresponding pre-menopausal patients. Moreover, patients of the late mortality peak were more likely to have suffered early local-regional or contra-lateral recurrence or to be pre-menopausal patients recurring anywhere at the second recurrence peak. CONCLUSION: The double-peaked hazard curve confirmed the occurrence of discontinuous features in the natural history of breast cancer for patients undergoing mastectomy. Indeed, the mortality pattern maintained definite signs of the previous double-peaked structure of recurrences. However, death events did not parallel the corresponding recurrence events and, moreover, pre and post-menopausal patients revealed dissimilar survival after recurrence, at least for early deaths. These findings, showing disconnection of mortality pattern from recurrence pattern for subsets of patients, suggest that parameters other than those influencing the recurrence risk may determine the survival of recurred patients.

Adult↗

Granulomatous lesions of the homolateral limb after previous mastectomy.

BACKGROUND: Granulomas may be classified as palisaded, sarcoidal, tuberculoid, suppurative and foreign body. In cancer patients they are defined as tumour-related sarcoid granulomas. Otherwise they are classified as granulomatous lesions of unknown significance. It is still unknown why neoplastic diseases are sometimes associated with granulomas. OBJECTIVES: To investigate granulomas found on the same side as a previous mastectomy. METHODS: We studied four women who had previously undergone mastectomy and presented with epithelioid cell granulomas of the same side as the previous mastectomy. CONCLUSIONS: The association between breast cancer and host granulomatous reaction is uncommon. The cases discussed may correspond to cutaneous tumour-related sarcoid granuloma reactions.

Aged↗

Immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy for cancer.

BACKGROUND: Immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy has increased over the past decade following the unequivocal demonstration of its oncological safety and the availability of reliable methods of reconstruction. Broadly, it is undertaken in the treatment of breast cancer, after prophylactic mastectomy in high-risk patients, and in the management of treatment failure after breast-conserving surgery and radiotherapy. Immediate breast reconstruction can be achieved reliably with a variety of autogenous tissue techniques or prosthetic devices. Careful discussion and evaluation remain vital in choosing the correct technique for the individual patient. METHODS: This review is based primarily on an English language Medline search with secondary references obtained from key articles. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Immediate breast reconstruction is a safe and acceptable procedure after mastectomy for cancer; there is no evidence that it has untoward oncological consequences. In the appropriate patient it can be achieved effectively with either prosthetic or autogenous tissue reconstruction. Patient selection is important in order to optimize results, minimize complications and improve quality of life, while simultaneously treating the malignancy. Close cooperation and collaboration between the oncological breast and reconstructive surgeons is desirable in order to achieve these objectives.

Breast Implants↗

Local recurrence after mastectomy and adjuvant CMF: implications for adjuvant radiation therapy.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the patterns of failure in a series of patients with node-positive breast cancer that was treated by total mastectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: A retrospective review was undertaken of 217 patients with node-positive breast cancer who were referred to the oncology departments of Westmead and Nepean Hospitals following total mastectomy between January 1980 and December 1991. The majority of patients (82%) were pre- or peri-menopausal and all underwent chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) by either an oral or intravenous regimen. No patient received adjuvant radiation therapy. RESULTS: After a median follow up of 8.7 years, 19% of patients had developed a loco-regional recurrence (LRR). The majority of LRR (79%) occurred within the initial 3 years after mastectomy. The risk of LRR was positively associated with the size of the tumour (11% for T1 vs 53% for T3, P < 0.001) and axillary nodal status (16% for three or fewer positive nodes vs 31% for four or more positive nodes, P = 0.017). Patients with T1 or T2 tumours and 1-3 positive nodes had the lowest rate of LRR (11%) while those with T3 tumours or 4-10 positive nodes had the highest rates, ranging from 23 to 75%. Relapse at the chest wall and supraclavicular fossa (SCF) accounted for 46 and 35%, respectively, of all LRR; relapse at the internal mammary chain and axilla was uncommon. CONCLUSION: The data suggest that patients with T3 tumours (> 5 cm) and any nodal involvement or patients with four or more involved axillary nodes, regardless of T stage, are at a high risk of LRR and will benefit from adjuvant radiation therapy to the chest wall and SCF.

Adult↗

The role of radiotherapy in patients undergoing mastectomy for carcinoma of the breast.

Several factors, including T stage, nodal involvement, grade, the presence of lymphovascular invasion, and possibly involved or close surgical margins, have been found to affect local recurrence after mastectomy. The majority of recurrences will occur in the first 5 years and 50% of patients will have metastatic disease at the time of recurrence. Early studies on the use of adjuvant radiotherapy are difficult to interpret owing to poor radiotherapy techniques, inadequate dose or a variety of confounding variables within a particular trial. More recent reports have confirmed that adjuvant radiotherapy will reduce the risk of local recurrence and in tumours of <5 cm with involved nodes, produce a reduction in breast cancer deaths. Improvements in breast cancer mortality may however be counterbalanced by increases in cardiac events and deaths caused by second malignancies. This stresses the importance of using megavoltage irradiation and avoiding excess cardiac doses particularly when treating left-sided tumours. Adjuvant radiotherapy combined with tamoxifen has been shown to produce an improvement in both local control and survival in postmenopausal node-positive patients who have undergone mastectomy. Adjuvant radiation combined with systemic chemotherapy has a significant effect on local recurrence and probably on survival in node-positive patients after mastectomy. There is little controversy over its role in patients with tumours >5 cm, with more than four nodes involved or with one to three nodes with extracapsular extension, or in those in whom axillary surgery has been deemed inadequate (i.e. <10 nodes). Debate still exists concerning T1/T2, G1/G2 tumours with only one to three nodes involved when the axillary surgery has been satisfactory (>10 nodes). The ongoing Intergroup trial may answer this question but until then other factors such as tumour grade and the presence of lymphovascular invasion can be included in the equation to determine which of the patients in the latter group should receive postoperative radiotherapy. Controversy still exists about what fields should be irradiated and in particular whether the supraclavicular fossa and internal mammary node chain should be included in adjuvant therapy. The EORTC is presently conducting a randomized trial, which should give us the answer. Treatment at relapse on the chest wall may require a combination of surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy, depending on previous therapy. If radiotherapy has not previously been used, then wide-field irradiation should be administered, including both chest wall and supraclavicular fossa with or without the axilla, depending on the extent of previous axillary surgery and the risk of lymphoedema. Re-irradiation after radical adjuvant radiotherapy can be considered only for selected patients when an adequate discussion with them has taken place with regard to the relative benefits versus toxicity.

Anticarcinogenic Agents↗

Immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy for cancer.

AIMS: The oncological, surgical and cosmetic results, patient satisfaction and psychological morbidity of immediate breast reconstruction following mastectomy for breast cancer were evaluated. METHODS: From 1980 to 1994, 79 immediate breast reconstructions were performed in Malmö. From 1985 immediate breast reconstruction was performed in 21% of mastectomies among patients </=65 years. The most common indication for immediate reconstruction was extensive DCIS+/-multifocal invasive growth. In 61 cases permanent implants were used and in 18 expanders. The median volume in the permanent implants was 225 ml, compared with 380 ml in cases where expanders were used. RESULTS: Post-operative complications requiring re-operation occurred in 13%. After introduction of the expander technique, no necrosis requiring explanation has occurred. Of the patients receiving radiotherapy, 71% developed capsular contracture (10/14). Four patients developed locoregional recurrence. Three-quarters of the patients had an acceptable to very satisfactory cosmetic result. Eight per cent were judged to have a Baker III-IV contracture. Of the patients, 85% were satisfied with the softness of the reconstructed breast and 76% stated the result to be in accordance with their expectations. CONCLUSIONS: We find immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy a safe operation with results comparable to those after late reconstruction and without an increased risk of recurrence. Immediate reconstruction with an implant is not recommended in cases where radiotherapy may be necessary.

Adult↗

Morbidity of immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) after mastectomy by a subpectorally placed silicone prosthesis: the adverse effect of radiotherapy.

AIMS: This study evaluates the incidence of local complications after immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) following mastectomy with a subpectorally placed silicone prosthesis, with emphasis on the effect of radiation treatment on IBR. METHODS: The medical records of 100 women, who underwent a mastectomy followed by IBR with a subpectorally placed silicone prosthesis at the University Hospital Rotterdam/Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, between March 1990 and March 1995, were reviewed. Thirteen prostheses were implanted prior to radiation treatment, and 15 prostheses were implanted after irradiation of the chest wall. RESULTS: Early complications were seen in 15% of the IBR and were more often in irradiated women. At long-term follow-up, the most common complication was capsular contracture (21%). This occurred significantly more around prostheses placed in a previously irradiated area (P<0.0005), or which were irradiated after IBR (P=0.001). Loss of prosthesis was seen in 11 cases, and was significantly (P<0.005) more in irradiated women (n=5; 18%) compared to women who were not irradiated (n=6; 7%). CONCLUSIONS: Complications after IBR with a silicone prosthesis were more common in women who were treated with radiotherapy prior to or after IBR following mastectomy than in women who were not irradiated. In particular, capsular contracture around a prosthesis placed in a previously irradiated area was significantly increased. The use of musculocutaneous flaps, such as the transverse rectus abdominis muscle or latissimus dorsi flap, is preferable for reconstruction of previously irradiated breasts. There is no indication to remove the prosthesis before radiation therapy of the chest wall.

Adult↗