Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Liquid Phase Microextraction”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

480 records · Page 27Linked to original sources
PubMed2006

On-rod standardization technique for time-weighted average water sampling with a polydimethylsiloxane rod.

In this study, a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) rod was developed as a passive sampler, based on the solid-phase microextraction (SPME) technique. The on-rod standardization technique was applied to the PDMS rod passive sampler. Using the desorption of the pre-loaded standard on the PDMS rod to calibrate the absorption of the target analytes allows for the determination of the time-weighted average (TWA) concentrations of pollutants in the aqueous media. The PDMS rod passive sampler with the on-rod standardization technique was tested in the laboratory with a flow-through system and was subsequently applied to measure TWA concentrations of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in the field (Hamilton Harbour, Hamilton, Ont., Canada). Both the laboratory and field experiments demonstrated that, with the on-rod standardization technique, the PDMS rod can be successfully used as a passive sampler for TWA water sampling in the field. The PDMS rod passive sampler benefits from the inherent advantages of the SPME approach: it incorporates sampling, isolation and enrichment into one step. The design of this system also addressed the additional needs for passive sampling techniques, providing an economical approach to field sampling that is also easy to deploy. Rather, with this approach, TWA concentrations of target analytes can be obtained by one sampler, and can be analyzed directly, with no further sample preparation treatment required.

Chromatography, Liquid↗
PubMed2001

Preparation and applications of polypyrrole films in solid-phase microextraction.

Polypyrrole (PPY) and poly-N-phenylpyrrole (PPPY) films were prepared and applied for solid-phase microextraction (SPME). The extraction properties of the new films to volatile organic compounds were examined using an SPME device coupled with GC-flame ionization detection. A PPY-coated capillary was applied for in-tube SPME to evaluate its extraction efficiency towards less volatile compounds and ionic species. The porous surface structures of the films, revealed by scanning electron microscopy, provided high surface areas and allowed for high extraction efficiency. Compared with commercial SPME stationary phases, the new phases showed better selectivity and sensitivity toward polar, aromatic, basic and anionic compounds, due to their inherent multifunctional properties. In addition, PPY and PPPY films showed different selectivity to various groups of compounds studied, indicating that the selectivity of the films could be modified by introducing a new functional group (phenyl in PPPY) into the polymer. For in-tube SPME, the PPY-coated capillary showed superior extraction efficiency to commercial capillaries for a variety of compounds, demonstrating its potential applications for a wide range of analytes when coupled with HPLC. The sensitivity and selectivity of the films for SPME could be tuned by changing the film thickness. These results are in line with both the theoretical expectations and the results obtained by other methods, which indicate not only that PPY films can be used as new stationary phases for SPME. but also that SPME method may provide an alternative tool for studying materials like polypyrrole.

Capillary Action↗
PubMed2002

Detection of explosives and their degradation products in soil environments.

Polynitro organic explosives [hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazine (RDX), octahydro-1,3,5,7-tetranitro-1,3,5,7-tetrazocine (HMX) and 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene (TNT)] are typical labile environmental pollutants that can biotransform with soil indigenous microorganisms, photodegrade by sunlight and migrate through subsurface soil to cause groundwater contamination. To be able to determine the type and concentration of explosives and their (bio)transformation products in different soil environments, a comprehensive analytical methodology of sample preparation, separation and detection is thus required. The present paper describes the use of supercritical carbon dioxide (SC-CO2), acetonitrile (MeCN) (US Environmental Protection Agency Method 8330) and solid-phase microextraction (SPME) for the extraction of explosives and their degradation products from various water, soil and plant tissue samples for subsequent analysis by either HPLC-UV, capillary electrophoresis (CE-UV) or GC-MS. Contaminated surface and subsurface soil and groundwater were collected from either a TNT manufacturing facility or an anti-tank firing range. Plant tissue samples were taken fromplants grown in anti-tank firing range soil in a greenhouse experiment. All tested soil and groundwater samples from the former TNT manufacturing plant were found to contain TNT and some of its amino reduced and partially denitrated products. Their concentrations as determined by SPME-GC-MS and LC-UV depended on the location of sampling at the site. In the case of plant tissues, SC-CO2 extraction followed by CE-UV analysis showed only the presence of HMX. The concentrations of HMX (<200 mg/kg) as determined by supercritical fluid extraction (SC-CO2)-CE-UV were comparable to those obtained by MeCN extraction, although the latter technique was found to be more efficient at higher concentrations (>300 mg/kg). Modifiers such as MeCN and water enhanced the SC-CO2 extractability of HMX from plant tissues.

Azocines↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Optimization of solid-phase microextraction for the gas chromatography/mass spectrometry analysis of persistent organic pollutants.

In this work, solid-phase microextraction (SPME) has been applied as an alternative for the selective extraction of 3 polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), 2,2',4,4'-tetrabromodiphenyl ether (PBDE-47); 2,2',4,4',5-pentabromodiphenyl ether (PBDE-99); and 2,2',4,4',6-pentabromodiphenyl ether (PBDE-100), and 2 alkylphenols, 4-tert-OP and 4-NP, prior to their analysis by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). The advantages of this technique are mainly its simplicity, cost-effectiveness, and time-saving sample preparation, as well as being a solvent-free technique. With the aim of optimizing the conditions for an efficient extraction of the studied compounds, different fiber coatings and the main parameters affecting the extraction procedure have been evaluated. The results obtained showed a good linearity in the range of concentrations investigated, and adequate relative standard deviation values were found according to the range accepted for SPME. Recovery values were in the range of 78-108%, and good detection and quantitation limits at ppt levels were obtained for both methods, allowing the determination of the selected compounds in samples at trace levels. The results obtained clearly show the potential of SPME for efficient concentration of the target compounds and also demonstrate the reliability of this extraction technique for their GC/MS analysis.

Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid↗
PubMed2002

Automated in-tube solid-phase microextraction coupled with HPLC for the determination of N-nitrosamines in cell cultures.

An automated in-tube solid-phase microextraction (SPME) HPLC analysis method for 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK) and several metabolites has been developed. NNK is one of the tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines (TSNA), which has been linked to cancers associated with the use of or exposure to tobacco products. In-tube SPME is an on-line extraction technique in which analytes are extracted and concentrated from the sample directly into a coated capillary by repeated draw/eject steps. In this study, a tailor-made polypyrrole (PPY)-coated capillary and several commercially available capillaries (capillary GC columns) were used to evaluate their extraction efficiencies for NNK and several metabolites in cell cultures. Compared with commercial capillaries that were currently used for in-tube SPME, the PPY-coated capillary showed better extraction efficiency for all of the compounds studied. After optimization of the extraction conditions, NNK and five metabolite compounds were analyzed in spiked cell cultures, confirming the applicability of the developed method. Excellent linearity was observed for all compounds (av R2 = 0.9942) and detection limits that ranged from 20 to 250 ng/mL. The average within-day and between day variations (% RSD) were 2.9 and 3.6%, respectively. This automated extraction and analysis method simplified the determination of the TSNA, requiring a total sample analysis time of only approximately 30 min.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Evaluation of solid-phase microextraction for the study of protein binding in human plasma samples.

Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) in combination with capillary gas chromatography and a nitrogen-phosphorous detector is used to study protein binding in human plasma samples. Local anesthetics of the amide-type (ropivacaine, bupivacaine, mepivacaine, prilocaine, and lidocaine) are used as model compounds in this evaluation. Carbowax/divinylbenzene (CW/DVB), polyacrylate, and polydimethylsiloxane fibers are tested. Sampling on CW/DVB fibers give the highest recovery in plasma samples compared with other fibers. Ultrafiltrate spiked with each of the substances is used for the construction of calibration curves. The protein binding is investigated at four different total concentrations from 0.5 to 15.0 microM. The degree of protein binding increases when the solute concentration decreases. Protein binding of the five solutes is investigated at four pH levels (6.4, 7.4, 8.4, and 9.4). It is found that protein binding increased with increasing pH. The influence of temperature variation (from 32 degrees C to 40 degrees C) on protein binding is also investigated. The protein binding decreases when the temperature increases. The methodology is validated and good correlation and precision are obtained. Back-calculated quality control samples give accuracy within 20% of theoretical values for all five substances. This study shows that SPME as a sample-preparation method gives the same protein binding for the studied local anesthetics as that achieved using earlier presented methods.

Anesthetics, Local↗
PubMed2000

In-tube solid-phase microextraction coupled to capillary LC for carbamate analysis in water samples.

Recently, the on-line sample preparation technique, intube solid-phase microextraction (SPME), was successfully implemented with a Hewlett-Packard 1100 HPLC system for analysis of carbamates in water samples. This paper describes the coupling of in-tube SPME to capillary LC and explores its utility as a sample preparation method in that format, relative to conventional LC. The Hewlett-Packard HPLC system was upgraded to a capillary LC system using commercially available accessories from LC Packings. The combination of in-tube SPME with a capillary LC system was expected to build on the merits of both in-tube SPME and the capillary LC to generate a sensitive method with an easy, effective, and efficient sample preparation. Due to the relatively large effective injection volume of the in-tube SPME technique (30-45 microL), on-column focusing was employed in order to achieve good chromatographic efficiency. Excellent sensitivity was achieved with very good method precision. For all carbamates studied, the RSD of retention time was between 0.5 and 0.8% under 4 microL/min microgradient conditions. The RSD of peak area counts was between 1.5 and 4.6%. The detection limits for all carbamates studied were less than 0.3 microg/L and, for carbaryl, just 0.02 microg/L (20 ppt). Compared with the conventional in-tube SPME/LC method, the LODs were lowered for carbaryl, propham, methiocarb, promecarb, chlorpropham, and barban, by factors of 24, 45, 42, 81, 62, and 56, respectively. The optimized method was successfully applied to the analysis of carbamates in surface water samples.

Carbamates↗
PubMed2001

Determination of organochlorine pesticides and their metabolites in soil samples using headspace solid-phase microextraction.

An analytical procedure was developed using headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) for the determination of organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) and their metabolites in sandy soil samples. The developed procedures involving fiber selection, temperature effect, absorption time, soil matrix and the addition of solvents of different polarity were optimized. Also, the results were compared to those achieved using Soxhlet extraction standard method. The 100-microm polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) and 65-microm PDMS-divinylbenzene showed good extraction efficiency for 18 organochlorine pesticides. An increase in the extraction efficiency of organochlorine pesticides and the metabolites was observed when the temperature increased, and an optimum temperature of 70 degrees C for extracting OCPs was obtained. The application of other hydrophilic solvents had different effects on the extraction of organochlorine pesticides and the metabolites. Higher responses of OCPs were obtained when 5 ml of water was added to the soil. Good linearity of OCPs between 0.2 and 4 ng/g soil was observed. The relative standard deviation was found to be lower than 25%. Also the limits of detection were between 0.06 and 0.65 ng/g, which were lower than those obtained using Soxhlet extraction. Moreover, the optimized HS-SPME procedure was applied to the analysis of OCPs in certified reference material (CRM) 804-050 soil and compared with Soxhlet extraction procedure. Results obtained in this study were in good agreement with those obtained using Soxhlet extraction. The mean values obtained using HS-SPME technique were in the range of 16.5 to 1459.6 mg/kg, which corresponds to the recoveries of 68% to 127% of the certified values of CRM soil.

Chromatography, Liquid↗
PubMed2002

Comparison of three different poly(dimethylsiloxane)-divinylbenzene fibres for the analysis of pesticide multiresidues in water samples: structure and efficiency.

Despite the continuing development of SPME (solid-phase microextraction) fibre coatings, their selection presents some difficulties for analysts in choosing the appropriate fibre for a certain application. There are two distinct types of SPME coatings available commercially. The most widely used are poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) and poly(acrylate) (PA). Supelco has developed new mixed phases consisting of porous polymer particles, either poly(divinylbenzene) (DVB) or Carboxen suspended in a matrix of PDMS or Carbowax for extracting analytes via adsorption. In addition to the nature of the extracting phase, the thickness of the polymeric film must be taken into account and, surprisingly, the construction of the fibres when apparently they bear the same coating, as it is the case of the three PDMS-DVB fibres available. Other fibre structure properties not well explored were identified and must be taken into consideration. To elucidate their extraction efficiency, three PDMS-DVB fibres, namely 60 microm for HPLC use, 65 microm for GC use and 65 microm StableFlex for GC use, were compared with regard to the extraction of 36 compounds included in four pesticide groups. The first was particularly suited for the extraction of organophosphorus pesticides and triazines whereas the StableFlex exhibited advantages in the analysis of organochlorine pesticides and pyrethroids. An explanation for the extraction differences is suggested based on the different structure of the fibres. Detection limits in the range of 1-10 ng/l for organochlorine pesticides, 1-30 ng/l for organophosphorus pesticides, 8-50 ng/l for triazines and 10-20 ng/l for pyrethroids were attained in a method using the 60 microm PDMS-DVB fibre. The fibre maintains its performance at well above 100 extractions with between-day precision below 10%.

Chromatography, Gas↗
PubMed2001

Analysis of acidic pesticides using in situ derivatization with alkylchloroformate and solid-phase microextraction (SPME) for GC-MS.

A solid-phase microextraction (SPME) method was developed for the analysis of acidic pesticide residues in water. The method utilizes in situ derivatization with butylchloroformate (BuCF), followed by on-line SPME extraction using a PDMS fibre, and analysis by GC-MS. Derivatives of the phenoxy acids mechlorprop (MCPP), dichlorprop (DCPP), MCPA and 2,4-D and their phenol degradation products 4-chloro-2-methylphenol and 2,4-dichlorophenol (DCP) were identified. Detection limits at 0.16-2.3 microg/l were achieved. Optimization of derivatization, ion strength, extraction time, SPME-fibre, desorption time and temperature are described. Standard curves in the range 0.5-10.0 microg/l were fitted to a second-degree polynomial. Standard deviation (n = 5) was below 10% for the phenol derivatives, but 20-50% for the phenoxy acids. For method verification groundwater samples from a field experiment were screened for content of MCPP and compared to the results from the HPLC analysis. A good agreement was obtained with respect to identification of positive samples, even though concentrations measured by the SPME were lower than with HPLC. Even if the precision and accuracy do not meet the demands for a strictly quantitative analysis, the SPME method is suitable for screening, because it is cheap, it can be automated, and uses smaller amounts of potential harmful solvents. Also, the method is less labour-intensive, as it requires a minimum of sample preparation when compared to traditional analyses. The acidic pesticides bentazon, dicamba, bromoxynil, ioxynil, dinoseb and DNOC were included in the study but could not be analysed by the current method.

Acids↗
PubMed2006

Development of a solid-phase microextraction method for the analysis of phenolic flame retardants in water samples.

A solid-phase microextraction (SPME) method for the ultra-trace determination of brominated phenols in aqueous samples has been developed and is reported for the first time to the best of our knowledge. 3,5,3',5'-tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA), the most widely used brominated flame retardant, and other phenolic flame retardants in commercial use, such as 2,4-dibromophenol (2,4-DBP), 2,4,6-tribromophenol (TBP) and pentabromophenol (PBP) have been included as target analytes. The analytical procedure involves the in situ acetylation-SPME and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) determination of the target analytes. A multi-factor categorical experimental design was created to study the main parameters affecting the extraction efficiency, allowing also the evaluation of interaction effects between factors. The factors studied were type of fiber, extraction mode, exposing the fiber directly into the sample (DSPME) or into the headspace over the sample (HSSPME), and extraction temperature. Carboxen-polydimethylsiloxane (CAR-PDMS) fiber appeared to be the most suitable of the five fibers tested for the extraction of most compounds, excluding PBP and TBBPA for which polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) was the most efficient coating. The highest response was achieved for both fibers sampling in headspace mode at 100 degrees C. In order to test the linearity of the method, calibration studies were performed with both CAR-PDMS and PDMS coatings. For both fibers, the method was linear in a range of 2 orders of magnitude, giving relative standard deviation (RSD%) below 10% for most compounds and detection limits at the low pg/mL level. In addition, the feasibility of the method for simultaneous determination of chlorinated and brominated phenols was studied. Finally, the method was applied to several real samples including tap water and effluent and influent waste water samples from an urban treatment plant, in which several phenolic compounds, such as phenol, methylphenols and chlorophenols, could be detected and quantified.

Acetylation↗
PubMed2005

Development of immunoaffinity solid phase microextraction probes for analysis of sub ng/mL concentrations of 7-aminoflunitrazepam in urine.

We report on the development of solid phase microextraction probes for drug analysis, prepared with antibodies specific for benzodiazepines covalently immobilized to the surface. In the technique, immobilized antibody probes are exposed to a sample containing the drug for 30 min. Extracted drugs are subsequently desorbed from the probes in 500 microL of methanolic desorption solution, which is dried, reconstituted in a small volume of injection solution and analysed by LC-MS/MS. The antibodies were characterized both before and after immobilization, to facilitate the rational selection of antibodies for such analyses. Polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies were compared as was the impact of affinity purification of the polyclonal antibody to isolate the drug-specific fraction. The probes were evaluated for utility in analyzing 7-aminoflunitrazepam at sub ng/mL concentrations in urine, which is expected to be found several days after a single oral dose of 2 mg of flunitrazepam. Such analyses are required in monitoring for abuse of this drug, both in terms of 'club drug' use and in cases of drug-facilitated sexual assault. In these cases drug concentrations in blood and urine are much lower than in chronic abuse cases and are difficult to analyse by conventional methods. The method developed has a limit of detection of 0.02 ng/mL, with accuracy ranging from 1% to 27% and precision (% R.S.D.) ranging from 2% to 10% between the lower and upper limits of quantitation for the analysis of 7-aminoflunitrazepam in urine. The dynamic range of the method is from 0.02 ng/mL, which is limited by the instrument sensitivity, to 0.5 ng/mL, which is approaching the capacity of the probes. This would allow for quantitative analysis of samples at concentrations below that measurable by many other methods for general benzodiazepines analysis from urine, and a highly selective screen for samples at higher concentrations. The method has similar limits of detection to the most sensitive literature methods specifically designed for such analysis but with the advantage of significantly simplified sample preparation. This simplification makes the technique more amenable for use by both professionals and non-professionals.

Algorithms↗