Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Laparoscopes”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 487 records · Page 27Linked to original sources
PubMed2003

Comparison of robotically performed and traditional laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Robotic laparoscopic surgery is postulated to result in better surgical results by allowing improved instrument manipulation and three-dimensional vision. The authors' experience performing robot-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery is reported. METHOD: Standard laparoscopic procedures with robot-assisted laparoscopic colon mobilization and vascular ligation were performed. Data relating to the operative procedure, hospital stay, and direct costs were collected. Results were compared with age, gender, and procedure case-matched controls taken from a prospective laparoscopic colorectal surgery database. RESULTS: Six robot-assisted laparoscopic surgeries (2 right hemicolectomies, 3 sigmoid colectomies, and 1 Wells rectopexy) were performed between December 2001 and June 2002. There was no associated morbidity. Operative time was increased from a median time of 108 minutes for standard laparoscopic colorectal surgery to 165 minutes for robot-assisted laparoscopic surgeries (P = 0.0313; Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test for nonparametric data). This was primarily a result of the time required for robot set-up. Blood loss, length of stay, and hospital cost were not significantly different between groups. Additional direct equipment costs for RAC cases included robotic laparoscopic instruments and sterile drapes (approximately US $350 per case), without including acquisition and maintenance costs for the robot. CONCLUSION: Robot-assisted laparoscopic colectomy is a feasible and safe procedure. Although three-dimensional vision and dexterity are facilitated, operative time is increased and the overall additional expense of robotics is of concern. Robot-assisted laparoscopic colectomy requires further evaluation to establish clinical and financial benefits before introduction to routine practice. Such techniques may, in the future, facilitate complex laparoscopic techniques.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Long-term survival after laparoscopic colon resection for cancer: complete five-year follow-up.

PURPOSE: The role of laparoscopic surgery in the cure of colorectal cancer is controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term survival after curative, laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer. Specifically, we wanted to review those patients who now had complete five-year follow-up. METHODS: One hundred two consecutive patients (March 1991 to March 1996) underwent laparoscopic colon resections for cancer at one institution and now have complete five-year survival data. Charts were retrospectively reviewed and results compared with conventional surgery, i.e., open colectomy at our institution, and with the National Cancer Data Base during a similar time period. RESULTS: Fifty-nine male and 43 female patients with an average age of 70 (range, 34-92) years made up the study. Complications occurred in 23 percent of patients, and one patient died (1 percent). Forty-four laparoscopic right colectomies, 2 transverse colectomies, 36 laparoscopic left or sigmoid colectomies, 15 laparoscopic low anterior resections, and 5 laparoscopic abdominoperineal resections were performed. The average number of lymph nodes harvested was 6.6 +/- 0.61 (range, 0-22). Eight cases (7.8 percent) were "converted to open"; i.e., the typical 6-cm extraction site was lengthened to complete mobilization, devascularization, resection, or anastomosis, or a separate incision was required to complete the procedure. There was one extraction-site recurrence and one port-site recurrence; both occurred before the routine use of plastic-sleeve wound protection. The mean follow-up for laparoscopic colon resection patients was 64.4 +/- 2.8 (range, 1-111) months. According to the TNM classification system, 27 patients had Stage I cancer, 37 had Stage II, 23 had Stage III, and 15 had Stage IV. Similar five-year survival rates for laparoscopic and conventional surgery for cancer were noted. The five-year relative survival rates in the laparoscopic colon resection group were 73 percent for Stage I, 61 percent for Stage II, 55 percent for Stage III, and 0 percent for Stage IV. The five-year relative survival rates for the open colectomy and National Cancer Data Base groups were 75 and 70 percent, respectively, for Stage I, 65 and 60 percent for Stage II, 46 and 44 percent for Stage III, and 11 and 7 percent for Stage IV. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic colon resection for cancer is safe and feasible in a private setting. Our data suggest that long-term survival after laparoscopic colon resection for cancer is similar to survival after conventional surgery. Prospective, randomized trials presently under way will likely confirm these results.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2006

Laparoscopic and open anterior resection for upper and mid rectal cancer: an evaluation of outcomes.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to compare the outcomes of laparoscopic anterior resection with open operation for mid and upper rectal cancer. METHODS: A total of 265 patients who underwent elective laparoscopic or open anterior resection for cancer of the mid and upper rectum from June 2000 to December 2004 were included. Data about the patients' demographics, operative details, postoperative outcome, and disease status were collected prospectively. Comparison of the outcome between laparoscopic and open resection was performed. RESULTS: The median age of the 265 patients was 69 (range, 27-91) years, and laparoscopic anterior resection was performed in 98 patients (37 percent). There was no difference in the age, gender, comorbidities, and level of tumor between the two groups. The operating time was longer in the laparoscopic group (200 vs. 127 minutes; P < 0.01), but the blood loss was less (200 vs. 250 ml; P = 0.027). The overall operative mortality was 1.8 percent, and the complication rate was 27.9 percent. Significantly more patients with early diseases (Stage I and Stage II) were operated with laparoscopic approach. There was no difference in the mortality or morbidity between the two groups. Anastomotic leakage occurred in five patients with open resection and one with laparoscopic resection (P = 0.418). Patients with laparoscopic resection had an earlier return of bowel function and earlier resumption of diet as well as a shorter median hospital stay (7 vs. 8 days; P < 0.001). With the median follow-up of the surviving patients for 21.2 months, the three-year local recurrence rates for those with open and laparoscopic resection were 4.9 and 3.3 percent, respectively (P = 0.513). In patients with Stage I and Stage II disease, the three-year cancer-specific survivals for open and laparoscopic resection were 89.8 and 88.6 percent, respectively (P = 0.882), whereas those of patients with Stage III disease were 65.6 and 55.5 percent, respectively (P = 0.911). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic anterior resection for mid and proximal rectal cancer is a safe option with short-term advantages compared with open operation. The oncologic outcomes of patients who underwent laparoscopic anterior resection were not compromised, with similar local recurrence rate and the cancer-specific survival rate as patients who underwent open resection.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Survey of residency training in laparoscopic and robotic surgery.

PURPOSE: We determined the current status of residency training in laparoscopic and robotic surgery in the United States and Canada. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 1,188 surveys were sent via the Internet to all 1,056 current urology residents and 132 program directors with an Internet address registered with the American Urological Association. RESULTS: Responses were received from 372 residents (35%) and 56 program directors (42%). Of respondents 47% reported greater than 100 laparoscopic procedures performed yearly by 1 (36%) or more (51%) faculty members. Robotic procedures were performed at 54% of the institutions, mainly consisting of prostatectomy and pyeloplasty. At all institutions laparoscopic radical nephrectomy was performed and those at 69% of the institutions believed that it is the gold standard for renal tumors today. Urologists were involved in 87% of adrenal surgeries and 54% of respondents believed that is the gold standard approach. However, only 35% of respondents had participated in laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Of respondents 36%, 42% and 17% reported that laparoscopic donor nephrectomy was performed by only urologists, only a nonurology transplant team and shared equally, respectively. Of respondents 41% planned on performing laparoscopic donor nephrectomy in the next year. Laparoscopic needle ablation renal surgery was done in 51% of the programs and percutaneous needle ablation was done in 63%. None of the respondents (0%) believed that it is the gold standard but 51% believed that ablative procedures look promising for renal tumors. Of respondents 39% had participated in robotic radical prostatectomy and 53% thought that it looked promising but was not the gold standard. Of respondents 31% believed that they will be performing robotic surgery after residency, 30% were unsure and 29% will not be using the robot. Overall 38% of residents thought that their laparoscopic experience was at least average or acceptable. CONCLUSIONS: A large number of laparoscopic urological procedures are being performed at training institutions with robotic procedures being performed at 54% of respondent facilities. Residents are participating in most cases but only 38% consider their laparoscopic experience to be satisfactory. A need still exists for increased laparoscopic training for residents, which can be accomplished by expanding training facilities and increasing the number of faculty members performing laparoscopic procedures.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Open versus laparoscopic simultaneous bilateral adrenalectomy.

OBJECTIVES: To compare our experience with synchronous bilateral adrenalectomy using laparoscopic and open techniques. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy has become the reference standard for management of benign unilateral adrenal pathologic findings. METHODS: This was a nonrandomized retrospective chart review of 12 known patients who underwent simultaneous bilateral adrenalectomy, comparing five laparoscopic and seven open procedures. One urologic surgeon performed all laparoscopic cases, and one general surgeon performed all open procedures. RESULTS: All patients had Cushing's disease or syndrome. The average patient age was 47.4 years (range 24 to 71) and 42.4 years (range 19 to 70), with an average body mass index of 38.2 kg/m2 and 36.0 kg/m2 for the laparoscopic and open groups, respectively. The operating time was on average 60 minutes longer for the laparoscopic group. No open conversions were necessary. The median blood loss (100 versus 500 mL, P < 0.01) and hematocrit drop (8.5% versus 12.6%, P = 0.05) were lower for the laparoscopic group. The transfusion rates and hospital stay trended lower in the laparoscopic group (20% versus 57% and 3 versus 8.5 days, respectively). Specimen weights for both the right and left glands trended larger for the laparoscopic group. The complication rates were similar between groups at 60% for the laparoscopic versus 71% for the open groups. CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous laparoscopic bilateral adrenalectomy is safe and effective. Compared with the open approach, it resulted in decreased blood loss, lower transfusion rate, and a trend toward a shorter hospital stay, although the operating time was longer. The laparoscopic approach should be the treatment of choice for bilateral adrenalectomy.

Adrenalectomy↗
PubMed2006

[Laparoscopic surgery in Europe. Where are we going?].

The most important factors that have facilitated the development of laparoscopic surgery (LS) are technological innovations and the vision of a small number of surgeons who took advantage of these advances. There are few surgical innovations that have stimulated such controversies and concerns and have raised so many medico-legal issues as LS. Although much progress has been made in LS, some important controversies remain unresolved, which are reviewed in the present article: 1. Evolution of the laparoscopic approach: total laparoscopic approach through positive-pressure capnoperitoneum, gasless laparoscopy, hand-assisted laparoscopy, and laparoscopy-assisted surgery. 2. Classification of current instrumental technology in laparoscopic surgery: a) facilitating instruments (high-power ultrasonic dissection systems); b) enabling instruments (endostapling and linear dissection devices), and c) complementary instruments: the Da Vinci robotic system. 3. Current laparoscopic surgical practice: a) interventions that definitively improve the patient's outcome (diagnostic and staging laparoscopy, cholecystectomy, adrenalectomy, splenectomy, antireflux surgery, cardiomyotomy, bariatric surgery, laparoscopic colon surgery, living donor nephrectomy); b) interventions that seem to be useful to the patient (distal pancreatic surgery, laparoscopic left hepatic resection, gastric and esophageal resections, hernioplasty), and c) interventions with uncertain benefit (right hepatectomy, pancreatoduodenectomy). 4. Future lines of development: video monitors in laparoscopic surgery, endoluminal surgery, robotic surgery, and finally, 5. Problems faced by laparoscopic surgery: quality guarantees in laparoscopic surgery, training the future laparoscopic generation, and allocation of sufficient material and human resources to laparoscopic surgery and its subspecialties.

Europe↗
PubMed2002

Laparoscopic versus open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection: a cost analysis.

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection is significantly less morbid than open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection but it is generally more costly due to longer operative time and disposable equipment. In response to budgetary pressure at our large county hospital we identified the cost components of laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection that could be targeted to decrease procedure costs before expanding our laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection program. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive literature review of open and laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection was performed and certain parameters were abstracted, including operative time and equipment, hospital stay, perioperative complications and surgical success rates. Using these data the projected overall cost and individual cost centers at our institution were compared for open and laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. Decision tree analysis models were devised to estimate the cost of each treatment using commercially available software. We performed 1 and 2-way sensitivity analysis to evaluate the effect of individual treatment variables on overall cost. Base case analysis involved a young man with clinical stage I nonseminomatous testicular cancer who was a candidate for retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. RESULTS: Based on a review of the costs at our institution open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection was a less costly procedure at $7,162 versus $7,804 for the laparoscopic approach. The slight cost superiority of the open approach was due to significantly lower costs associated with operating room time and equipment. On the other hand, the laparoscopic procedure showed a cost advantage for hospital stay. On 1-way sensitivity analysis laparoscopic dissection was less costly when operative time was less than 3.6 hours, hospitalization was less than 2.2 days or laparoscopic equipment costs were less than $768. On 2-way sensitivity analysis the laparoscopic approach was cost advantageous when performed in less than 5 hours or when the patient was discharged home within 2 days postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: The primary cost variables for surgical treatment for testicular cancer include operative time, hospital stay and equipment cost. According to published data and decision tree analysis open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection is slightly less costly (less than $650) than laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for the surgical treatment of clinical stage I nonseminomatous testicular cancer at our institution. Our model identifies several measures that can be applied at any institution to render laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection economically superior to the open approach.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Laparoscopic versus open splenectomy for immune thrombocytopenic purpura.

BACKGROUND: We sought to determine whether laparoscopic techniques can reduce the operative morbidity of surgery in patients undergoing splenectomy for immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP). METHODS: All patients (60) undergoing splenectomy for ITP at the Royal Adelaide Hospital from January 1985 to November 1995 were reviewed. Results of patients undergoing open operation were obtained by means of retrospective case note review, whereas details of all patients undergoing laparoscopic splenectomy were collected prospectively and maintained on a computerized database. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients underwent splenectomy with an open technique and 13 with a laparoscopic technique. Patient groups were demographically similar. All laparoscopic procedures were completed with the laparoscopic technique. An accessory spleen was also removed at laparoscopic operation from two (15%) patients and at open operation from three patients (6%). Two more accessory spleens were missed at the original procedure, one at open operation and one at laparoscopic operation. These required later removal by using open and laparoscopic techniques, respectively. Blood and platelet transfusion requirements were reduced by the laparoscopic approach. Although mean operating times were similar (87 versus 88 minutes), laparoscopic splenectomy was associated with a greatly reduced postoperative hospital stay (10 versus 2 days, median; p < 0.0001) and no major morbidity. Long-term normalization of platelet counts was similar for the two techniques. The laparoscopic approach resulted in a reduction in hospital treatment costs from $4224 to $2238 per case (cost savings of $1986 per case). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic splenectomy results in improved clinical outcomes and reduced costs for patients undergoing elective splenectomy for ITP.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1992

Training, credentialing, and evaluation in laparoscopic surgery.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become the procedure of choice for the treatment of gallbladder disease. Many general surgeons have incorporated laparoscopic cholecystectomy into their clinical practices, usually after completing a postgraduate didactic and laboratory animal training course. This additional formal training is both appropriate and necessary because laparoscopic surgery involves techniques different from those of traditional celiotomy, and most surgeons who completed their residencies prior to 1992 have had no laparoscopic training. Because additional formal training for practicing surgeons is necessary at this time, it is appropriate for hospitals to mandate separate granting of operative privileges for laparoscopic surgical procedures. In the near future, when graduates of general surgery residency programs have had training in laparoscopic surgery, separate privileges will no longer be necessary, and laparoscopic procedures should be included in the standard privilege category of biliary tract surgery. Once privileges in laparoscopic surgery are granted, laparoscopic operations, like all surgical procedures, should be monitored by peer review to ensure that they continue to be performed safely and appropriately. Only those laparoscopic procedures that are similar to open operations and have been shown by pilot studies to be safe (e.g., cholecystectomy) should be included currently in a surgeon's laparoscopic privileges. Laparoscopic procedures that are very different from proven open procedures and are investigational (e.g., inguinal herniorrhaphy) should be permitted by the hospital only as part of an experimental protocol monitored by an institutional review board. Only after their safety and efficacy have been established should they become part of standard privilege categories.

Credentialing↗
PubMed2002

Laparoscopic omentectomy for salvage of peritoneal dialysis catheters.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Maintaining long-term peritoneal catheter function for peritoneal dialysis is commonly threatened by problems with catheter obstruction. Multiple methods have been used to salvage nonfunctioning catheters, including omentopexy, catheter repositioning, and omentectomy. We report on our experience with a laparoscopic method of omentectomy and catheter fixation for salvage of nonfunctioning peritoneal dialysis catheters. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirteen patients with nonfunctioning peritoneal dialysis catheters underwent 16 laparoscopic procedures with the intent to restore function. Clinically, all patients presented with outflow obstruction. At initial presentation, all patients underwent diagnostic laparoscopy and a definitive procedure. In 12 patients, catheters were enveloped by omentum, and we performed laparoscopic omentectomy and catheter fixation to the anterior pelvic wall. In one patient, we identified a broken catheter and performed a laparoscopic omentectomy at the time of catheter replacement. One 10-mm and two 5-mm trocars were utilized. Omentectomy was performed using either endo-GIA stapled resection (2 patients) or the Harmonic Scalpel (11 patients). All trocar incisions (including the 5-mm site) were closed with a suture-passing (Carter-Thomason) device to provide water-tight closure in anticipation of immediate return to peritoneal dialysis. Patients were followed postoperatively for an average of 17 months (range 4-35 months). RESULTS: All patients' catheter function was restored intraoperatively with laparoscopic omentectomy and catheter fixation. Eight catheters remained functioning following omentectomy without further intervention. Five patients (38%) experienced repeat catheter malfunction and underwent laparoscopic exploration. Of these, three catheters (60%) were restored to function with laparoscopic manipulation alone. Three catheters were found encased in extensive adhesions. Laparoscopic adhesiolysis was successful in one patient and unsuccessful in one patient, who converted to hemodialysis. One patient failed laparoscopic salvage and required open laparotomy and fibrin clot removal to restore catheter function. One catheter was found to be obstructed within a pericolic hematoma. One catheter was found within residual omentum at the hepatic flexure. Both of these catheters were freed laparoscopically and continued to function at 12 and 16 months' follow-up. Complications included one episode of peritonitis, one case of postoperative ileus, and one trocar site hernia necessitating repair. The nephrologists were instructed that they could begin peritoneal dialysis on postoperative day 1. Seven patients resumed peritoneal dialysis without leak from trocar sites. The remaining patients received temporary hemodialysis through a central venous catheter and returned to peritoneal dialysis at the discretion of their nephrologists. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic omentectomy with catheter fixation is a minimally invasive means of salvaging peritoneal dialysis catheters with outflow obstruction. Complications are few, and closure of laparoscopic incisions in water-tight fashion allows rapid return to peritoneal dialysis.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Simple model for training in the laparoscopic vesicourethral running anastomosis.

PURPOSE: To create a simple model for training in the complex technique of laparoscopic vesicourethral anastomosis after radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A model simulating the performance of a laparoscopic running urethrovesical anastomosis was fashioned using skin of a supermarket chicken set in a laparoscopic training box. A circular continuous anastomosis was performed, following exactly the technique we use in vivo for performing a vesicourethral anastomosis after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Details regarding the use of the right or the left needle holder, needle positioning, precise stitch position, and use of forehand or backhand stitch were strictly respected in order to reproduce the continuous stitch currently done in vivo in our department. The learning curve was analyzed in terms of the time necessary to perform the task and the quality of the anastomosis. RESULTS: The model was created and used by the junior authors during their year of fellowship in advanced laparoscopic urology. The authors had no previous experience with hands-on laparoscopic suturing but have assisted in a great number of laparoscopic radical prostatectomies. The time required for performing the anastomosis on the model declined from 75 minutes initially to 20 minutes after the trainees had performed 20 anastomoses each. After this training, it was possible to create a watertight running laparoscopic vesicourethral anastomosis in patients in a mean time of 40 minutes (range 30-55 minutes). CONCLUSION: This simple model allows the trainee in laparoscopic urology to acquire the skills necessary to perform a laparoscopic vesicourethral anastomosis, one of the most complex steps in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, as well as to develop dexterity and facility in laparoscopic manipulation of needles, sutures, and fragile tissues.

Anastomosis, Surgical↗
PubMed1995

Laparoscopic splenectomy and lymph node biopsy for hematologic disorders.

OBJECTIVE: The authors audit the introduction of laparoscopic splenectomy and laparoscopic intra-abdominal lymph node biopsy and compare outcomes with a parallel cohort of patients undergoing open splenectomy. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Laparoscopic splenectomy was first reported in 1992. It was introduced into clinical practice at the Royal Brisbane Hospital in 1991. Between June 1991 and March 1994, 24 patients have undergone laparoscopic splenectomies and 23 patients have had laparoscopic intra-abdominal lymph node biopsies. METHODS: Laparoscopic splenectomy was performed using a four- or five-port technique. The splenic hilum was secured using a linear stapler cutter, and the spleen was removed after placing it in a laparoscopic bag. Lymph node biopsy was performed using a three- or four-port technique, depending on the site and size of the lymphadenopathy. RESULTS: Laparoscopic splenectomy was completed in 22 patients (92%). Median hospital stay was 3 days (range 2-7 days) and morbidity occurred in two patients (8%). Lymph node biopsy was completed laparoscopically in 21 of 23 patients (91%), with morbidity in two cases (9%). Median hospital stay was 2 days (range 1-6 days), with a diagnostic accuracy of 90%. Comparison with open splenectomy revealed that the laparoscopic approach took significantly longer to perform (p = 0.0002), but resulted in a significantly shorter hospital stay (p = 0.0005). CONCLUSIONS: Both laparoscopic splenectomy and laparoscopic lymph node biopsy currently are used as the treatments of choice for hematologic disease in our institution.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Laparoscopic fundoplication failures: patterns of failure and response to fundoplication revision.

OBJECTIVE: To determine rates and mechanisms of failure in 857 consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease or paraesophageal hernia (1991-1998), and compare this population with 100 consecutive patients undergoing fundoplication revision (laparoscopic and open) at the authors' institution during the same period. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Gastroesophageal fundoplication performed through a laparotomy or thoracotomy has a failure rate of 9% to 30% and requires revision in most of the patients who have recurrent or new foregut symptoms. The frequency and patterns of failure of laparoscopic fundoplication have not been well studied. METHODS: All patients undergoing fundoplication revision were included in this study. Symptom severity was scored before and after surgery by patients on a 4-point scale. Evaluation of patients included esophagogastroscopy, barium swallow, esophageal motility, 24-hour ambulatory pH, and gastric emptying studies. Statistical analysis was performed with multiple chi-square analyses, Fisher exact test, and analysis of variance. RESULTS: Laparoscopic fundoplication was performed in 758 patients for gastroesophageal reflux disease and in 99 for paraesophageal hernia. Median follow-up was 2.5 years. Thirty-one patients (3.5%) have undergone revision for fundoplication failure. The mechanism of failure was transdiaphragmatic herniation of the fundoplication in 26 patients (84%). In 40 patients referred from other institutions, after laparoscopic fundoplication, only 10 (25%) had transdiaphragmatic migration (p < 0.01); a slipped or misplaced fundoplication occurred in 13 patients (32%), and a twisted fundoplication in 12 patients (30%). The failure mechanisms of open fundoplication (29 patients) followed patterns previously described. Fundoplication revision procedures were initiated laparoscopically in 65 patients, with six conversions (8%). The morbidity rate was 4% in laparoscopic procedures and 9% in open ones. There was one death, from aspiration and adult respiratory distress syndrome after open fundoplication. A year or more after revision operation, heartburn, chest pain, and dysphagia were rare or absent in 88%, 78%, and 91%, respectively, after laparoscopic revision, and were rare or absent in 91%, 83%, and 70%, respectively, after open revision, but 11 patients ultimately required additional operations for continued or recurrent symptoms, 3 after open revision (17%), and 8 after laparoscopic fundoplication (11%). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic fundoplication failure is infrequent in experienced hands; the rate may be further reduced by extensive esophageal mobilization, secure diaphragmatic closure, esophageal lengthening (applied selectively), and avoidance of events leading to increased intraabdominal pressure. When revision is required, laparoscopic access may be used successfully by the laparoscopically experienced esophageal surgeon.

Fundoplication↗
PubMed2001

Results of laparoscopic and open splenectomy for nontraumatic diseases.

The medical records of patients who had undergone splenectomy for nontraumatic diseases of the spleen between 1997 and 2000 were reviewed. The aim of the study was to evaluate the short-term outcomes of open and laparoscopic splenectomies and to determine whether some well-known benefits of laparoscopic surgery could be observed in patients who underwent laparoscopic splenectomy for nontraumatic splenic diseases. The data of 44 patients were available for analysis and included 20 patients (45.5%) who underwent laparoscopic splenectomy and 24 patients (54.5%) who underwent open splenectomy. Various parameters were reported for open and laparoscopic procedures separately, including associated surgical procedures, spleen weight, postoperative mortality and morbidity rates, perioperative blood transfusions, use and length of abdominal drainage, accessory spleen removal, operative times, length of hospital recovery, and hematologic parameters on admission to and discharge from the hospital. Laparoscopic splenectomy was successfully completed in all 20 considered patients with no conversion to open splenectomy. The supine position and four trocars were adopted in all patients. Accessory spleens were found in four (9.0%) patients: two (4.5%) during open splenectomy and two (4.5%) during laparoscopic splenectomy. The postoperative mortality rate was 2.7% (a case of myocardial infarction). The morbidity rate was 9% (four patients), but no postoperative complications occurred after laparoscopic splenectomy. A significant statistical difference was shown by the increase in platelet counts after open versus laparoscopic splenectomy. The open and laparoscopic mean operative times (73.70 +/- 13.42 minutes and 78.42 +/- 14.63 minutes, respectively) were comparable. These times were comparable also considering patients who underwent only splenectomy. Mean recovery time was shorter after laparoscopic splenectomy (3.95 +/- 0.60 days) than after open splenectomy (7.0 +/- 1.68 days). After open procedures, however, the mean recovery time was shorter in uncomplicated cases (6.68 +/- 1.49 days) than in the open group as a whole. Authors conclude that many well-known advantages of the laparoscopic approach. especially those related to its low invasiveness, can be observed in patients requesting splenectomy for nontraumatic diseases of the spleen, without lowering the efficacy of this operation. They suggest that such advantages can be entirely displayed when selection criteria of the patients are applied.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Laparoscopic versus open sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis.

This study compared laparoscopic with open sigmoid colectomy for patients with a diagnosis of diverticulitis. Increased use of less invasive techniques makes it vitally important to evaluate outcomes of these techniques as compared with standard open procedures. Patients undergoing sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis without hemorrhage (code 56211) between January 1997 and December 2001 were reviewed. Two groups were identified: those undergoing open sigmoid colectomy and those undergoing laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy; American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores, operative time, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay, morbidity/mortality, and hospital charges were compared. During the study period 271 sigmoid colectomies were performed for diverticulitis without hemorrhage: 56 laparoscopically and 215 with the standard open technique. Four patients required conversion from laparoscopic to open colectomy. Mean ASA scores were: open group 2.4; laparoscopic group, 1.9 (P < 0.001). Mean operative times were: laparoscopic group, 170 +/- 45 minutes; open group, 140 +/- 49 minutes (P < 0.001). In the open group 39 patients required transfer to the ICU; one patient in the laparoscopic group required transfer to the ICU. Average hospital lengths of stay for the open and laparoscopic groups were 9.06 and 4.12 days, respectively (P < 0.001). Complications were recorded in 57 (27%) of 215 patients who underwent an open procedure versus 5 (9%) of 56 patients who underwent laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy (P < 0.01). There were three deaths in the open group and none in laparoscopic group. Average total hospital charges were 25,700 dollars for open sigmoid colectomy and 17,414 dollars for laparoscopic colectomy. Laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy compares favorably with open sigmoid colectomy for patients with a diagnosis of diverticulitis.

Colectomy↗
PubMed2003

Review of laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery in the "Zitha" Hospital (Luxembourg) in the year 2002.

BACKGROUND: A review and outcome of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in the visceral surgery unit in the Zitha Hospital for the year 2002. METHODS: All patients, presenting with benign or malignant disease of the colon or rectum were evaluated. Depending on the tumour size, a laparoscopic approach is advocated whenever possible. Operation and patient specific factors (age, duration of the procedure and duration of hospital stay, diagnosis of malignant tumour versus benign disease, conversion and complication rate) are presented. Patients who had to be converted are classified under the open surgery group. RESULTS: A total of 103 laparoscopic or open procedures on the colon/rectum were performed between the 1st of January 2002 and the 31st of December 2002. 74% were treated by a laparoscopic and 26% by an open approach. 10 out of 103 patients did not undergo a colonic resection but instead an emergency colostomy/ ileostomy or oversewing of a bowel leak, in 8 cases performed laparoscopically. 44 patients have been operated for a benign disease (36 laparoscopic and 8 open procedures) and 59 patients have been treated for a malignant disease (40 laparoscopic and 19 open procedures). The average operating time for the laparoscopic resection was 160 minutes in comparison to 182 minutes for the open resection. The conversion rate (inclusive of non-resection procedures) was 5% for a benign disease and 11% for colorectal cancer. The minor complication rate was 16% in laparoscopic surgery and 30% in open surgery. We saw two major complications in both the open and laparoscopic groups (4%). Reoperation was necessary in one patient out of 103. The average postoperative hospital stay was 7.78 days for the laparoscopic and 16.6 days for the open group. The hospital mortality was 2.9%. CONCLUSION: The laparoscopic colorectal resection is a safe and beneficial procedure for the patient when used in experienced hands.

Colonic Neoplasms↗
PubMed2004

Laparoscopic procedures as a risk factor of deep venous thrombosis, superficial ascending thrombophlebitis and pulmonary embolism--case report and review of the literature.

UNLABELLED: Since its introduction laparoscopic surgery has been used for many indications, e.g., cholecystolithiasis, hernia, appendicitis, fundoplication, benign large bowel disease and gynaecological disorders. It has been considered as safe and efficient procedure for most patients with only few contraindications, mostly heart-lung disease. When the initial enthusiasm has been replaced by a more critical observation, more complications of laparoscopy or laparoscopic surgery were not only discovered but also reported. In laparoscopic hernia repair there is a tendency for severe complications when compared to open surgery. There is a controversy on possible side-effects of laparoscopic surgery, e.g., thrombosis, and the increased necessity of prophylaxis for thromboembolic events. Recently a growing number of reports on thromboembolic complications in association with laparoscopic surgery were published. Thrombosis may be caused by detrimental effects of pneumoperitoneum on venous flow (increased abdominal pressure and negative Trendelenburg position) and activation of the haemostatic system. Further risk factors may contribute to the risk to develop venous thrombosis. It is well accepted that varicose veins are associated with an increased risk for the thrombosis. However, the association of varicose veins with complications of laparoscopic surgery is unclear. The possible impact of thrombotic complications makes an analysis of the association of varicose veins or a history of deep vein thrombosis on the development of thrombosis after laparoscopic surgery mandatory. Although this is the first report on ascending thrombophlebitis and thrombosis of the sapheno-femoral junction after laparoscopic surgery, the incidence of deep vein thrombosis or superficial thrombophlebitis after laparoscopic surgery or laparoscopy may be much higher according to the pathophysiological changes during and after these procedures. In many patients venous thrombosis may not be recognized or it appears when the patient is already discharged. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopy and laparoscopic procedures may have an increased risk for the development of thrombosis due to increased abdominal pressure and negative Trendelenburg position. Patients with varicose veins and a history of thromboembolism may aggravate laparoscopy associated risks for the development of thromboembolic complications. Superficial thrombophlebitis in the thigh is not a benign disease entity and may lead to deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). Urgent surgical treatment (high ligation) may be warranted together with low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and compressions therapy. Patients with varicose veins and a history of venous thrombosis may not be suitable candidates for laparoscopic surgery. Family practitioners may be confronted with this complication more often since patients are discharged earlier from hospital after laparoscopic interventions due to legislative regulations.

Diverticulitis, Colonic↗
PubMed2006

[Experience of laparoscopic salvage surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility of the laparoscopic salvage surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer. METHODS: Seven cases with recurrent rectal carcinoma treated by laparoscopic salvage surgery from February 2004 to July 2005 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, four were males and 3 females, and the median age was 60 years (range 37-74). Three cases of recurrence were after conventional anterior resection, 2 after laparoscopic-assist anterior resection, 1 after laparoscopic-assist Parks' procedure, and 1 with pars sacral fistula after per-sacral-local resection for three times. Image examination (CT scanning) was taken preoperatively to evaluate the locally recurrence and exclude the distant metastases. The laparoscopic-assist procedure with or without a hand-assist technique was used in this study. RESULTS: Six cases with the recurrent lesion of central type were treated by salvage surgical procedure as follows: 3 laparoscopic-assist anterior resection, 1 laparoscopic-assist abdominoperineal resection, 1 laparoscopic-assist posterior exenteration, and 1 laparoscopic-assist proctocolectomy with a terminal ileum stoma. All of them were R0 resection confirmed by postoperative pathological examination. The other one with the lesion of combination type was treated with the procedure of laparoscopic-assist sigmoid colostomy. A hand-assist technique was used in 2 cases. The mean operation time, bleeding and hospital day was (211 +/- 13) min, (200 +/- 91) ml, and (15 +/- 10) d, respectively. No conversion and complication occurred. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic salvage surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer is safe and feasible when taken by experienced laparoscopic colorectal surgeon to the cases with the recurrent lesion of central type.

Adult↗