Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “LAMINECTOMY”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 487 records · Page 27Linked to original sources
PubMed1991

Analysis and prevention of spinal column deformity following cervical laminectomy. I. Pathogenetic analysis of postlaminectomy deformities.

Postlaminectomy deformities were simulated in the cervical or cervicothoracic spine by the use of a displacement incremental method based on finite-element analysis combined with composite material and spanning element theory. The simulation analyses revealed that the primary cause of postlaminectomy deformity was the resection of one or more spinous processes and/or posterior ligaments (ie, ligamenta flava, supraspinous, and interspinous ligaments). After their removal, the tensile stresses that were preoperatively distributed through the posterior ligaments were transferred to the facets. This led to an imbalance of the stresses on the spinal bodies, causing deformity. The gravitational center of the head determined whether the deformity would develop as a kyphosis or increasing lordosis. As the elastic modulus of the soft tissue composites (eg, end plates, ligaments, and facets) increased, a kyphotic deformity changed gradually from swan-neck deformity, to extreme kyphotic deformity with a large curvature, and finally to a straightening deformity. Progressive kyphotic deformity is found only in children.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Post-laminectomy cerebrospinal fluid fistula treated with epidural blood patch.

UNLABELLED: OBJECTIVES AND SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Cerebrospinal fluid fistula after spinal surgery is associated with a definite risk of meningitis or discitis, and as a result, early active intervention usually is recommended. METHODS AND RESULTS: This report describes the successful use of an epidural blood patch after a more conventional intervention--namely, surgical re-exploration--had failed to control a postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak. CONCLUSIONS: The techniques involved in performing a blood patch after spinal surgery may well differ from those usually recommended in the management of spinal headache resulting from other causes of dural puncture.

Aged↗
PubMed1995

Clinical correlates of patient satisfaction after laminectomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective multicenter observational study of the outcome of surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. OBJECTIVES: To identify correlates of patient satisfaction with the results of surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Little published information exists on correlates of patient satisfaction after surgery for spinal stenosis. METHODS: Preoperative and 6-month follow-up data for 194 patients were analyzed. Associations between preoperative variables and satisfaction with the results of surgery were examined in univariate and multivariate models. RESULTS: In multiple linear regression models that adjusted for the effects of age, gender, individual surgeon, number of interspaces decompressed, whether a fusion was performed, depression score, and overall level of pain, the predominance of back (as opposed to leg) pain, greater comorbidity, and worse preoperative functional status were associated with lower patient satisfaction. The regression model explained just 15% of the variance in patient satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: Patients bothered predominantly by back pain preoperatively and those with greater medical comorbidity and functional disability are significantly less satisfied with the results of surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.

Aged↗
PubMed1997

Occipitocervical fusion with C1 laminectomy in children.

STUDY DESIGN: Eight children in whom atlantoaxial dislocation had developed underwent occipitocervical fusion using a rectangular rod. The postoperative results are presented, and the postoperative growth and deformation of the cervical spine were determined radiographically. OBJECTIVES: To investigate in a relatively long-term follow-up study whether occipitocervical fusion affects the growth of the cervical spine and induces spinal deformation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: It has been reported that children who have undergone C1-C2 posterior fusion are likely to develop abnormal curvature or deformation of the cervical spine as a result of a disturbance of growth of the fused vertebrae. There have been no studies, however, to confirm that these changes occur after occipitocervical fusion in children. METHODS: The subjects were one boy and seven girls who had undergone occipitocervical posterior fusion during childhood. The average age at the time of surgery was 8.3 years, and the average follow-up period was 5.9 years. The following were assessed radiographically: redislocation of the atlas, bone union, changes in the curvature of the cervical spine, the height and width of the vertebral bodies, and the anteroposterior diameter of the spinal canal. RESULTS: Solid bone union was achieved in all patients with maintenance of the reduced position at the time of surgery. None of the patients exhibited abnormal curvature of the cervical spine. The rate of increase in height of the C2 vertebral body was significantly less than that of vertebral bodies below C3. The rate of increase in width of the vertebral body and the anteroposterior diameter of the spinal canal of the C2 vertebral body and vertebral bodies below C3 did not differ significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Occipitocervical fusion with a rectangular rod is useful for treating atlantoaxial dislocation in children and yields excellent results because of the firm internal fixation it achieves. This surgery induced no apparent postoperative spinal deformations.

Atlanto-Axial Joint↗
PubMed1997

1997 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective, randomized study comparing decompressive laminectomy and arthrodesis with and without spinal instrumentation.

STUDY DESIGN: This prospective study analyzed the influence of transpedicular instrumented on the operative treatment of patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the addition of transpedicular instrumented improves the clinical outcome and fusion rate of patients undergoing posterolateral fusion after decompression for spinal stenosis with concomitant degenerative spondylolisthesis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Decompression is often necessary in the treatment of symptomatic patients who have degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis. Results of recent studies demonstrated that outcomes are significantly improved if posterolateral arthrodesis is performed at the listhesed level. A meta-analysis of the literature concluded that adjunctive spinal instrumentation for this procedure can enhance the fusion rate, although the effect on clinical outcome remains uncertain. METHODS: Seventy-six patients who had symptomatic spinal stenosis associated with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis were prospectively studied. All patients underwent posterior decompression with concomitant posterolateral intertransverse process arthrodesis. The patients were randomized to a segmental transpedicular instrumented or noninstrumented group. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients were available for a 2-year follow-up. Clinical outcome was excellent or good in 76% of the patients in whom instrumentation was placed and in 85% of those in whom no instrumentation was placed (P = 0.45). Successful arthrodesis occurred in 82% of the instrumented cases versus 45% of the noninstrumented cases (P = 0.0015). Overall, successful fusion did not influence patient outcome (P = 0.435). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing single-level posterolateral fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis, the use of pedicle screws may lead to a higher fusion rate, but clinical outcome shows no improvement in pain in the back and lower limbs.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Dynamic left ventricular outflow obstruction during lumbar laminectomy as an unexpected cause of intraoperative hypotension.

We present a case of previously undiagnosed hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) with left ventricular outflow obstruction in a woman anesthetized for lumbar hemilaminectomy and diskectomy. The treatment of her sudden unexplained hypotension was initially confounded by a diagnosis of compensated congestive heart failure and diuretic therapy. Swift intervention with transesophageal echocardiography revealed the tru pathology altering her intraoperative treatment and her subsequent chronic treatment for her heart condition.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Reduction of radiculopathy and pain with Oxiplex/SP gel after laminectomy, laminotomy, and discectomy: a pilot clinical study.

STUDY DESIGN: Safety using Oxiplex/SP Gel during single-level discectomy for reduction of symptoms associated with unilateral herniation of the lumbar disc was investigated by self-assessment questionnaire and magnetic resonance imaging. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and assess the efficacy parameters of Oxiplex/SP Gel. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Animal studies demonstrated that Oxiplex/SP Gel (CMC/PEO) reduced epidural fibrosis after lumbar surgery. METHODS: Surgeons examined spine and lower extremities of patients scheduled for discectomy to assess neurologic function and pain. Treated patients received sufficient Oxiplex/SP Gel (1-3 mL) to coat the nerve root and fill the epidural space. The control condition was surgery alone. At baseline, then 30 days, 90 days, and 6 months after surgery, patients completed self-assessment questionnaires concerning leg pain, lower extremity weakness, functional disability, daily living activities, symptoms, and radiculopathy. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed at baseline and 90 days after surgery. At 30 and 90 days after surgery, patients underwent physical examination, wound inspection, and laboratory tests. RESULTS: The surgical procedures were well tolerated by the 23 patients treated with Oxiplex/SP Gel and the 11 control patients. There were no unanticipated adverse events, no clinically significant laboratory results, and no significant differences detected by magnetic resonance imaging. Treated patients had greater reduction in outcome measures at 30 days. The differences in scores were attenuated at 90 days and 6 months. A subgroup, the patients with significant leg pain and weakness at baseline (11 patients treated with Oxiplex/SP Gel and 7 control patients), had greater reduction in outcome measures than the control patients throughout the study. CONCLUSIONS: Oxiplex/SP Gel was easy to use and safe for patients undergoing unilateral discectomy. Greater benefit in clinical outcome measures was seen in gel-treated patients, especially those with severe leg pain and weakness at baseline.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Complications associated with lumbar laminectomy: a comparison of spinal versus general anesthesia.

STUDY DESIGN: A case-controlled, comparative study of 400 patients undergoing lumbar surgery, treated with either spinal or general anesthesia. An independent observer analyzed outcomes. OBJECTIVES: To determine the rate and type, of perioperative complications associated with each anesthetic method among lumbar surgery patients. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Spinal anesthesia is infrequently used for spinal procedures. While complications associated with spinal anesthesia are rare, some authors have suggested that spinal anesthesia may exacerbate existing neurologic disease and have recommended against its use in lumbar disc surgery. Others have found the technique safe and effective. General anesthesia may be preferred because it is seen as the routine accepted practice, because of greater patient acceptance and the ability to perform longer operations, or because of a general sense that general anesthesia is "safer" in these procedures. METHODS: Patients treated between 1994 and 1998 were matched for anesthetic class, preoperative diagnosis, surgical procedure, and perioperative protocols. All patients were treated according to a uniform protocol and recovered in the same perianesthetic environment. Data from the intraoperative period through hospital discharge were collected and compared. RESULTS: A total of 200 patients were included in each group. Overall complication rates and time to discharge were significantly lower in spinal anesthetic patients. Total anesthetic and operative times were significantly longer for general anesthetic patients, and perioperative heart rate and mean arterial pressures were elevated compared with those in spinal anesthetic patients. Nausea, requirements for antiemetic medication, and the incidence of urinary retention were significantly increased among general anesthesia patients. Spinal anesthesia patients had fewer spinal headaches compared with the general anesthetic group, but statistical significance was not obtained. CONCLUSIONS: For patients undergoing decompressive lumbar surgery, spinal anesthesia is at least comparable to general anesthetic with respect to complications. Specific advantages to spinal anesthesia include decreased nausea and antiemetic requirements, reduced analgesic requirements, and reduced overall complication rate.

Anesthesia, General↗