Ensuring fairness in coverage decisions: applying the American Medical Association Ethical Force Program's consensus report to managed care pharmacy.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · Search PubMed
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The US Medicare programme, through its new Part D programme, now offers limited coverage for prescription medicines. The coverage is provided via a variety of drug plans and their respective formularies. The federal regulatory scheme generally requires that the formularies contain drugs representative of the various therapeutic classes. On the other hand, the federal government has generally refrained from making specific decisions that specific drug entities are the most cost effective and therefore must be included in the formularies. With the dawn of Medicare Part D in the US, the federal government will be increasingly involved in supporting the cost of medicines, and will need to confront this challenge in the face of tight overall economic constraints on the federal budget. Any spending on medications of questionable efficacy will inevitably compromise the ability to deliver more cost-effective healthcare measures. Laxity in the approval process for ineffective drugs may therefore result in lack of funds to support acquisition of more useful medicines for the elderly.
This article draws upon a combined political and moral economy theoretical framework to explicate the rise and fall of the Medicare Catastrophic Coverage Act (CHI). Underlying factors, including the legacy of Medicare, the politics of austerity, and the declining political legitimacy of the aged in the 1970s and 1980s, are seen to have heavily shaped the unique characteristics of the legislation, such as its unpopular self-financing mechanism. Moral economy concerns with reciprocity, fairness, and just taxation are used to help explain the intensity of the "senior revolt" against CHI, which ultimately led to the legislation's repeal. The "Catastrophic catastrophe" is seen as having further eroded the political legitimacy of the old, while at the same time demonstrating the raw political muscle of this population group. Implications of the repeal of CHI for future health coverage legislation, and the impact of repeal on the states and other stakeholders, also are discussed.
In this article we examine the previously little-studied development in U.S. health care--the growth of a proprietary ambulatory care system composed of health maintenance organization, urgent care centers, ambulatory surgicenters, ambulatory diagnostic centers, large group practices, and other delivery modalities. The growth of this system as a result of the ease of access to capital, limited or nonexistent regulation through Certificate of Need or other mechanisms, the growing surplus of physicians, decreases in the use of hospitals as a result of changed insurance benefits and inpatient utilization review, new developments in biotechnology, and computerization and miniaturization of new technological advances is discussed. The reasons for the expanded growth of proprietary chains over nonprofit systems of ambulatory care are also discussed. The article concludes with a discussion of the negative consequences for individual health and the health care system that may be generated by the continued growth of proprietary ambulatory care.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
This paper presents an account of considerations relevant to conversion of data in an administrative record system into categories compatible with the ICIDH. Existing information recorded for the Swiss disablement insurance scheme fairly readily generates impairment and disability data relating to the time of first contact with the scheme, and the means for conversion are illustrated. The system does not generate data relevant to handicap.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
A new tax credit to help low-income families and individuals purchase health insurance can address the problem of affordability, but will not overcome other barriers these populations face in obtaining coverage. This paper proposes that families have the option of using a new tax credit to buy into a state-administered system such as Medicaid or the State Children's Health Insurance Program. This option has three advantages. First, it allows families to remain with a single health program and health plan as their income fluctuates. Second, it provides an alternative to the complex and confusing individual insurance market. This alternative is community rated, does not use underwriting, and allows health plan behavior to be monitored closely by the state. Third, it allows the state to act as a financial buffer-helping overcome the barrier to participation that cash-flow problems and year-end reconciliation concerns are likely to create among a low-income population. Many people would want to use their tax credit in the private market, but the buy-in option increases the likelihood that the tax credit approach would succeed.
While health insurance tax credits could help people who otherwise could not afford to purchase coverage, many might still find individual coverage too expensive and its marketplace dynamics bewildering. As an alternative, this paper outlines an approach using private purchasing pools for tax-credit recipients. The objective is to offer these individuals and families a choice among competing health plans, and provide many of the same advantages enjoyed by workers in large employer groups, such as relatively low administrative costs, no health rating, and an effective "sponsor." Some express optimism that private pools will emerge naturally and thrive as an option for individual tax-credit recipients. However, adverse selection and other individual health insurance market forces make this a dubious prospect. The approach presented here gives purchasing pools the same tool employer groups use to maintain stability and cohesion--a significant contribution that cannot be used elsewhere. The ability to offer health plans exclusive access to a sizable new, previously uninsured clientele--tax-credit recipients-would enable purchasing pools to attract health plan participation and thus overcome one major reason several state-directed pools for small employers have failed. To avoid other pitfalls, the paper also suggests private pool structures, as well as federal and state roles that seek to balance objectives for market innovation and choice with those for coverage-source stability and efficiency.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The current dilemmas in primary care stem from 1) the unintended consequences of forces thought to promote primary care and 2) the "disruptive technologies of care" that attack the very function and concept of primary care itself. This paper suggests that these forces, in combination with "tiering" in the health insurance market, could lead to the dissolution of primary care as a single concept, to be replaced by alignment of clinicians by economic niche. Evidence already exists in the marketplace for both tiering of health insurance benefits and corresponding practice changes within primary care. In the future, primary care for the top tier will cater to the affluent as "full-service brokers" and will be delivered by a wide variety of clinicians. The middle tier will continue to grapple with tensions created by patient demand and bureaucratic systems but will remain most closely aligned to primary care as a concept. The lower tier will become increasingly concerned with community health and social justice. Each primary care specialty will adapt in a unique way to a tiered world, with general internal medicine facing the most challenges. Given this forecast for the future, those concerned about primary care should focus less on workforce issues and more on macro health care financing and organization issues (such as Medicare reform); appropriate training models; and the development of a conception of primary care that emphasizes values and ethos, not just function.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
We are extending the expiration date of the cardiovascular system listing found in appendix 1 of part 404, subpart P, from June 6, 1991, to June 6, 1992. We have made no revisions in the medical criteria in the cardiovascular listings; they remain the same as they now appear in the Code of Federal Regulations. We are presently considering revisions to update the medical criteria contained in part A and part B of the listing, and any revised criteria will be published as a proposed rule when we have completed our review. Insofar as Medicare eligibility is based on entitlement to disability insurance benefits under title II of the Act, this proposed regulation affects the Medicare program. To the extent that Medicaid eligibility is based on title XVI eligibility, this proposed regulation affects the Medicaid program.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.