Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “IPECAC”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 487 records · Page 27Linked to original sources
PubMed1993

Ipecacuanha-induced emesis: a human model for testing antiemetic drug activity.

In a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study, five groups of 10 healthy men received single 5-minute infusions of 8 mg, 4 mg, 1 mg, 0.25 mg, or 0.1 mg ondansetron (as hydrochloride dihydrate) 30 minutes before oral administration of 30 ml syrup of ipecacuanha. Emetic episodes and nausea (100 mm visual analog scale) were assessed over an 8-hour period. There were no emetic episodes after 8 or 4 mg ondansetron. Seven, nine, and 10 subjects vomited after 1 mg, 0.25 mg and 0.1 mg ondansetron, respectively, with median times to onset of 62, 31, and 37 minutes. Median peak nausea scores were 0 mm for both 8 and 4 mg ondansetron and 30, 53, and 26 mm for 1, 0.25, and 0.1 mg ondansetron. Adverse events were mild. This model showed a close correlation with clinically effective doses of ondansetron. It may be successfully and safely used to assess the antiemetic potential of 5-HT3-receptor antagonists in healthy subjects.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

The first line of response for people who self-poison: exploring the options for gut decontamination.

The trend for increasing numbers of self-poisoning incidents has been noted and a variety of policy initiatives have been launched. Nurses, particularly in emergency room environments occupy a pivotal place in the chain of response to such acts. Any such response needs to be firmly rooted in evidence-based practice yet the initial management of self-poisoning often involves a consideration of procedures, the application of which can vary enormously. This paper offers some contextual information prior to a critical perspective of management modes, namely emesis, lavage, the use of activated charcoal and whole bowel irrigation. A comparison of the relative advantages and disadvantages of each mode precedes suggestions for nursing practice.

Algorithms↗
PubMed2002

Effects of lerisetron, a new 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, on ipecacuanha-induced emesis in healthy volunteers.

The purpose of these studies was to evaluate the effect of lerisetron (1-phenyl-methyl-2-piperazinyl-1H-benzimidazole hydrochloride, CAS 143257-98-1, F-0930-RS2), a new 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, on ipecacuanha-induced nausea and vomiting. The ipecacuanha model of emesis has been used to test the anti-emetic activity of several different 5-HT3 antagonists and the anti-emetic doses that were effective in the ipecacuanha model have been found to correlate well with the clinically effective doses. Study 1 investigated oral doses of lerisetron from 4 mg to 40 mg. Study 2 evaluated the duration of effect of a single dose of 20 mg oral lerisetron. Study 3 evaluated intravenous doses of 18 mg and 12 mg lerisetron. In Study 1, the 40 mg dose of oral lerisetron inhibited emesis in all test subjects. The percentage of subjects who experienced an emetic episode increased as the dose of lerisetron decreased. At the lowest dose level tested five of six subjects had an emetic episode compared with four out of five in the placebo group. In Study 2, 20 mg oral lerisetron was effective up to 12 h after administration. When ipecacuanha was administered at 18 h post-dose three of seven subjects had an emetic episode and at 24 h post-dose the incidence of emesis was similar to the placebo treatment groups in the previous study. Study 3 demonstrated the effectiveness of intravenous doses of lerisetron. The 18 mg intravenous dose reduced the number of patients experiencing emetic episodes by 75% compared with placebo, doses below 12 mg i.v. were not evaluated because of the reduced efficacy of the compound at this dose level. In conclusion, lerisetron has been shown to be effective in the treatment of ipecacuanha-induced nausea and vomiting at intravenous doses of 18 mg and at oral doses of 20 mg for up to 12 hours.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1994

Pharmacological and phytochemical studies of Cephäelis axillaris.

The most significant effect, observed in the preliminary pharmacological evaluation of the whole ethanol extract and the alkaloidal fraction of Cephäelis axillaris, was the hyperemia of ears and external mucosas which was most probably due to an alpha-adrenergic blocking activity. In addition, both samples also induced a marked hypotension in normotensive as well as hypertensive (SHR) rats and inhibited the increases of blood pressure induced by i.v. administration of noradrenaline in pithed rats. The structures of the major alkaloidal components of the extract were elucidated on the basis of chemical characterization assays and IR, UV, 1H and 13C one and two-dimensional NMR analyses.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

The role of activated charcoal and gastric emptying in gastrointestinal decontamination: a state-of-the-art review.

Gastrointestinal decontamination has been practiced for hundreds of years; however, only in the past few years have data emerged that demonstrate a clinical benefit in some patients. Because most potentially toxic ingestions involve agents that are not toxic in the quantity consumed, the exact circumstances in which decontamination is beneficial and which methods are most beneficial in those circumstances remain important topics of research. Maximum benefit from decontamination is expected in patients who present soon after the ingestion. Unfortunately, many overdose patients present at least 2 hours after taking a medication, when most of the toxin has been absorbed or has moved well into the intestine, beyond the expected reach of gastrointestinal decontamination. Decontamination probably does not contribute to the outcome of many such patients, especially those without symptoms. However, if absorption has been delayed or gastrointestinal motility has been slowed, activated charcoal may reduce the final amount absorbed. The use of activated charcoal in these cases may be beneficial and is associated with few complications. Therefore, administration of activated charcoal is recommended as soon as possible after emergency department presentation, unless the agent and quantity are known to be nontoxic, the agent is known not to adsorb to activated charcoal, or the delay has been so long that absorption is probably complete. The use of gastric emptying in addition to activated charcoal has generated intense debate. Several large comparative studies have failed to demonstrate a benefit of gastric emptying before activated charcoal. Because complications of such 2-step decontamination include a higher rate of intubation, aspiration, and ICU admission, gastric emptying in addition to activated charcoal cannot be considered the routine approach to patients. However, there are several infrequent circumstances in which the data are inadequate to accurately assess the potential benefit of gastric emptying in addition to activated charcoal: symptomatic patients presenting in the first hour after ingestion, symptomatic patients who have ingested agents that slow gastrointestinal motility, patients taking sustained release medications, and those taking massive or life-threatening amounts of medication. These circumstances represent only a small subset of ingestions. In the absence of convincing data about benefit or lack of benefit of gastric emptying for these patients, individual physicians must act on a personal valuation: Is it better to use a treatment that might have some benefit but definitely has some risk or not to use a treatment that has any risk unless there is proven benefit?

Absorption↗
PubMed1978

Poisoning in children under age 5: identification and treatment.

A rational approach to management of poisoning in young children requires assessment of what, when, and how much drug was ingested. Emesis, if indicated, is followed by general supportive measures, enhanced removal of absorbed poison, and antidote therapy.

Age Factors↗
PubMed1982

Pediatric poisoning the first 30 minutes.

Two distinct subpopulations in the pediatric age-group are particularly at risk for poisoning, and the substances likely to be ingested by each group differ. The method of critical care given here incorporates consideration of specific types of poisoning into an overall plan of general diagnostic and therapeutic measures.

Adolescent↗