Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “DIATHESIS”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 487 records · Page 27Linked to original sources

Pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis--the immune diathesis and the role of viruses.

Although the evidence of involvement of viruses in the pathogenesis of MS is largely circumstantial, the pattern of association is constant, with little evidence for direct viral infection of the CNS but with a consistent immune response to several common viruses. In parallel with these studies, epidemiological studies, while indicating genetic predisposition, favor an environmental pathogenetic factor and experimental models indicate that viruses can induce demyelination either by oligodendrolysis or by a variety of immune mechanisms with or without persistence in the CNS. In elucidating the pathogenesis of MS, the challenge is to understand the basis of the immune abnormalities, with intrathecal synthesis of viral antibodies and abnormal immune responses to some viruses, and to relate these to the MRI abnormalities which indicate periodic BBB breakdown. There is strong evidence that the breakdown is associated with inflammation. and that cytokines, particularly TNF, may play a role in demyelination. In conclusion, therefore, several factors are probably key in our understanding of MS. These include: (i) the genetic control of the immune system and its interaction with viral antigen; (ii) related effects on cerebral endothelium including cytokine and adhesion molecule regulation; and (iii) associated glial and axonal responses. Such an approach to the pathogenesis of MS may not identify a specific cause. It may, however, indicate that a pathological cascade can be "triggered" by several common viral infections and that therapy can be used to intervene at several points in the pathological response.

Animals↗

Should anti-Helicobacter therapy be different in patients with dyspepsia compared with patients with peptic ulcer diathesis?

Physicians should try to reach an optimal cure rate with initial anti-Helicobacter therapy. Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with peptic ulcer disease (PUD) is more likely to be cured then in patients with 'functional' dyspepsia (FD). Differences in cure rates of 5-15% are usually reported, which is considered to be clinically relevant. Different strains (virulent v. non-virulent) in PUD and FD may induce different alterations in the gastric mucosa, and thereby either facilitate or impair antimicrobial efficacy. A study in this journal showed that triple therapy with ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC) was superior to triple therapy with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI), but only in the more-difficult-to-cure FD patients. Clinicians should be aware that most published treatment studies have included only PUD patients. This means that in clinical practice the cure rates obtained in patients with FD or even uninvestigated dyspepsia will usually be lower then those reported in the literature. One way to deal with this is to consider prolonging the duration of an initial anti-Helicobacter therapy from 7 to 10 or 14 days in patients without ulcers.

Anti-Ulcer Agents↗

From diathesis to dimorphism: the biology of gender differences in depression.

Unipolar depression is more common in women than men. We pursue a unifying explanation for the sex difference in the incidence of depression that emerges at puberty and is unlikely to be fully explained as an artifact or as a result of socialization or contemporary sex roles. Because symptomatic anxiety disorders show a similar female preponderance in women, we consider the biology of anxiety disorders and their links to depression. Rather than viewing gender as directly determining differential unipolar depression rates, we hypothesize a primary postpubertal effect of gonadal hormones on limbic system hyperactivity, which predisposes women to potentially higher rates of certain anxiety and depressive disorders.

Anxiety↗

Hypertrophic response and keloid diathesis: two very different forms of scar.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Have a greater appreciation of the extent of differences and similarities between keloid and hypertrophic scarring. 2. Have a greater appreciation of the significance of the stage of maturation of a keloid or hypertrophic scar with regard to its morphologic, biochemical, and molecular profile. 3. More critically review basic science research that is based on poorly characterized scar tissue. 4. More critically review clinical studies that are based on poorly characterized scar tissue. BACKGROUND: Hypertrophic and keloid scars remain extremely challenging, particularly in their variable response to treatment. The understanding of hypertrophic and keloid scarring is evolving from a position where they were regarded as different stages of the same process to the contemporary perspective of two separate entities. This article reviews the differences in the two forms of scarring and discusses the implications for future research. METHODS: The authors conducted a MEDLINE search of all English language reviews linking key words "hypertrophic," "keloid," and "scarring." RESULTS: Over the past four decades, there has been considerable clinical and experimental research looking at the biological nature and therapeutic response of keloid and hypertrophic scarring. As more differences are emerging regarding the fundamental biology of the scars, investigators are giving more detailed characterization of their source material. It is evident that even within the broad categories of hypertrophic and keloid scarring there is a heterogenous distribution of pathologic connective tissue matrix biology. CONCLUSION: Considerable advances have been made in our understanding of the fundamental biology of scarring. As research methodology becomes even more sophisticated, it will be even more crucial to extensively characterize source material, recognizing major differences not only between keloid and hypertrophic scar but also between scars of varying stages of maturation and histomorphological, biochemical, and molecular variations within individual scars.

Apoptosis↗