Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Copying Processes”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 487 records · Page 27Linked to original sources
PubMed1952

Copying microfilms.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Copying Processes↗
PubMed2004

A comparison between direct and indirect methods available for human bite mark analysis.

Comparison techniques used in bite mark analysis are many and varied, the choice of technique depending largely on personal preference. Until recently, no one technique has been shown to be better than the others, and very little research has been carried out to compare different methods. This study evaluates and compares the accuracy of direct comparisons between suspects' models and bite marks with indirect comparisons in the form of conventional traced overlays of suspects' models or a new method using photocopier-generated overlays. Artificial bite marks in pigskin were made using standardized sets of models and recorded as photographs and fingerprint powder lifts on tape. The bite mark photographs and fingerprint lifts were coded and randomized so that a blind comparison could be made with the models, traced overlays, and photocopier-generated overlays using a modified version of the American Board of Forensic Odontology Scoring (ABFO) System for Bite Marks. It was found that the photocopier-generated overlays were significantly more accurate at matching the correct bite mark to the correct models irrespective of whether the bite mark was recorded photographically or as a fingerprint lift. The photocopier-generated overlays were also found to be more sensitive at matching the correct bite marks to the correct models than the other two methods used. The modified ABFO scoring system was able to discriminate between a correct match and several incorrect matches by awarding a high score to the correct match.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

[Fraudulent use of digital radiographs: secret reality or fiction?].

Digital radiography has several advantages and has become an indispensable diagnostic tool for many dentists in daily practice. Once the digital captation appears on screen, the dental x-ray software allows image enhancement, to get a better vision and diagnosis. This image enhancement is acquired for example by adjusting the colour, density, sharpness, brightness or contrast. If the digital radiographs are exported, using various software packages created for graphic design and image manipulation, digital information can be altered, added or removed. Dental radiographs are easily duplicated, stored or spread in digital format. How can their authenticity be guaranteed, especially in insurance cases? Image enhancement features of digital radiography allow mishandling or potential abuse. Recently published studies illustrate the potential fraudulent use of digital radiography. In this article, some manipulated radiographic images are presented, to raise concerns about security, reliability and the potential for fraud.

Computer Security↗
PubMed2005

Plagiarism.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Copying Processes↗
PubMed2005

A comparative study on methods of measuring mesiodistal tooth diameters for interceptive orthodontic space analysis.

AIM: This study was designed to find the most reliable method of measurement of mesiodistal tooth diameter. METHODS: Measurements were made of all erupted permanent teeth of 14 orthodontic study casts. These measurements were made directly by using A) a digital calliper, B) measuring photocopies of casts with a calliper, C) a Magiscan Image Analysis using a photocopy of the casts. Measurements derived from the two methods were compared by statistical analysis. RESULTS: These showed that the electronic digital calliper was the most reliable method of measuring mesiodistal tooth diameter using dental study casts. The measurement of photocopies was unreliable and the image analysis method had a too high error factor.

Copying Processes↗