Comparative evaluation of oral fluorescein angiography using the confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope and digital fundus camera with intravenous fluorescein angiography using the digital fundus camera.
BACKGROUND: To study the efficacy of oral fluorescein angiography (FA) with confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope (CSLO). METHODS: Ten patients each of choroidal neovascular membrane, central serous retinopathy, diabetic retinopathy and five normal subjects were evaluated with group 1 - intravenous FA using digital fundus camera (DFC); group 2 - oral FA using DFC; and group 3 - oral FA using CSLO. RESULTS: Third-order branch vessels were identified in 85.7% eyes in group 3 versus 51.4% in group 2 (P = 0.004), image quality was comparable to intravenous FA in 77.1% in group 3 versus 48.5% in group 2 (P = 0.02) and margin delineation was better in 80% eyes in group 3 versus 35% in group 2 (P = 0.01). The foveal avascular zone was clear and intact in 54.2% eyes in group 3 versus 37.1% in group 2 (P = 0.14) and 57.1% in group 1 (P = 0.8). CONCLUSION: Oral FA using CSLO is superior to oral FA using DFC and comparable to intravenous FA using DFC in terms of image quality, branch retinal vessel identification and margin delineation.