SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “recommendations”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 469 records · Page 26Linked to original sources

PubMed1998

[Folate and health--new knowledge and new recommendation].

The dietary intake of folate in Norway is not optimal with regard to minimizing the risk of birth defects (especially neural-tube defects), and poSsibly also cardiovascular diseases and other diseases. The National Nutrition Council has therefore initiated a project to evaluate the status of folate in Norway and to recommend actions for necessary improvement. A protective effect of folic acid supplements on neural-tube defects has been found in observational studies and clinical trials. The effects of folate on cardiovascular diseases and cancer are less certain. The estimated average intake of folate from foods in Norway is lower than the recommended 300 micrograms per day for adult women and men, and remarkably lower than the 400 micrograms per day recommended for pregnant and lactating women. Thus, with the aim of minimizing the risk for neural-tube defects, the National Nutrition Council now recommends that all women who are planning pregnancy or who are likely to become pregnant have an intake of at least 400 micrograms folate per day. Because it may be difficult to achieve this through diet alone, and because an additional risk-lowering effect of folic acid supplementation has been shown, a folic acid supplement of 400 micrograms per day is recommended for this group. The supplement should be taken one month before conception and during the first two months of pregnancy. Fortification of foods with folate is not recommended because some groups may then exceed the recommended upper intake level.

Adult↗

PubMed2026

Sustainable dietary recommendations for the Spanish population.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development highlights the urgent need for a profound transformation in food production and consumption to enhance both sustainability and human health. The aim of this study is to provide both the general population and food system stakeholders with the most comprehensive and current information available on healthy and sustainable dietary patterns, in the form of culturally adapted food-based guidelines. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of the scientific evidence published since 2019 on the association between main food groups consumption and the risk of developing chronic diseases and premature mortality to update the information provided by the Dietary Guidelines for Americans 2020-2025, which summarized previous evidence. With this information, we updated the servings recommended in the former dietary guidelines for Spain. Then, we considered the recommendations of the EAT-Lancet Commission for healthy diets within planetary boundaries, specific dietary habits and food production in Spain, and adjusted the servings per each group to consider these characteristics. RESULTS: A minimum intake of 5 servings of vegetables and fruits per day is recommended, which may be distributed in at least 3 servings of vegetables per day, and 2-3 servings of fruits per day. Cereal consumption is set at 3-6 servings per day, adjusted to individual energy needs and prioritizing whole grains, no more than 4 servings per day are advised in cases of caloric restriction. Plant-based foods are recommended as the primary protein source, with legumes incorporated into at least one main daily meal and consumed at a frequency of at least 4 servings per week, ideally up to daily. Nut consumption should reach at least 3 servings per week, up to one serving per day, choosing those without added salt, fats or sugar. The remaining protein portions may include fish (≥3 servings/week, prioritizing oily fish and low-impact species), eggs (up to 4/week), dairy (up to 3/day, with low-sugar and low-salt options), and meat (up to 3/week, emphasizing poultry and rabbit, and minimizing processed meats). Daily consumption of olive oil at main meals is recommended. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed Sustainable Dietary Recommendations can help improve the health and well-being of the Spanish population, while reducing the environmental impact.

Humans↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Do follow-up recommendations for abnormal Papanicolaou smears influence patient adherence?

OBJECTIVE: To compare adherence to follow-up recommendations for colposcopy or repeated Papanicolaou (Pap) smears for women with previously abnormal Pap smear results. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Three northern California family planning clinics. PATIENTS: All women with abnormal Pap smear results referred for initial colposcopy and a random sample of those referred for repeated Pap smear. Medical records were located and reviewed for 90 of 107 women referred for colposcopy and 153 of 225 women referred for repeated Pap smears. INTERVENTION: Routine clinic protocols for follow-up--telephone call, letter, or certified letter--were applied without regard to the type of abnormality seen on a Pap smear or recommended examination. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Documented adherence to follow-up within 8 months of an abnormal result. Attempts to contact the patients for follow-up, adherence to follow-up recommendations, and patient characteristics were abstracted from medical records. The probability of adherence to follow-up vs the number of follow-up attempts was modeled with survival analysis. Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine multivariate relationships related to adherence. RESULTS: The rate of overall adherence to follow-up recommendations was 56.0% (136/243). Adherence to a second colposcopy was not significantly different from that to a repeated Pap smear (odds ratio, 1.40; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-2.46). The use of as many as 3 patient reminders substantially improved adherence to follow-up. Women without insurance and women attending 1 of the 3 clinics were less likely to adhere to any follow-up recommendation (hazard ratio for no insurance, 0.43 [95% confidence interval, 0.20-0.93], and for clinic, 0.35 [95% confidence interval, 0.15-0.73]). CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to follow-up was low in this family planning clinic population, no matter what type of follow-up was advised. Adherence was improved by the use of up to 3 reminders. Allocating resources to effective methods for improving adherence to follow-up of abnormal results may be more important than which follow-up procedure is recommended.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2000

Health food store recommendations for breast cancer patients.

CONTEXT: Despite cancer patients' widespread and growing use of complementary and alternative medicine, minimal attention has been paid to the role of health food stores in the "supply side" of this phenomenon. OBJECTIVE: To gain a better understanding of health food store personnel's recommendations for breast cancer patient care. DESIGN: Researcher posing as the daughter of a breast cancer patient and surveying health food store personnel on their product recommendations for cancer care. SETTING: Oahu, Hawaii, summer 1998. PARTICIPANTS: All health food stores (N = 40) offering products for cancer patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Recommended products and services, proposed mechanism of action, and costs. RESULTS: Store personnel readily provided information and product recommendations, with shark cartilage being the most frequent. Suggested mechanisms of action drew on traditional healing, scientific, and pseudoscientific rationales. Costs for recommended dosages varied multifold across stores and brands. CONCLUSIONS: Retailers supplying supplements can play an important role in the network of "authorities" for patients with breast and other cancers, as they readily provide advice and recommend products. The reasons why patients seek health food store remedies are useful in developing approaches to patient education. Physicians and other providers are in a key position to assist cancer patients in making informed choices when considering health store products.

Breast Neoplasms↗

PubMed1985

Screening procedures in the asymptomatic adult. Comparison of physicians' recommendations, patients' desires, published guidelines, and actual practice.

To assess attitudes and practices regarding screening tests and preventive procedures, we surveyed 83 physicians in a hospital-based ambulatory care practice and compared their recommendations with the recommendations in published guidelines, the desires of 188 of their own patients, and the physicians' actual practice patterns on the surveyed patients. The surveyed physicians recommended screening procedures more frequently than the published guidelines in 48 situations and less frequently in 18 situations. Physicians at earlier levels of training tended to recommend more procedures than those who had completed training. Patients desired far more frequent screening than recommended either by their physicians or by the published guidelines. Physicians did not live up to their own recommendations for four of 14 procedures or to published guidelines for five of 14 procedures, with such failure occurring principally in situations where the test or procedure would normally be done personally by the physician.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2004

Impact of thimerosal-related changes in hepatitis B vaccine birth-dose recommendations on childhood vaccination coverage.

CONTEXT: In July 1999, the longstanding preference to begin hepatitis B vaccination of all US infants at birth was temporarily suspended because of concerns about exposure to mercury contained in the vaccine preservative thimerosal. The suspension was lifted in September 1999 when preservative-free hepatitis B vaccine became available. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of changes in recommendations regarding administration of a hepatitis B birth dose on vaccination coverage. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cohort analysis of vaccination status of 41,589 US children born before, during, and after the recommendation to suspend the birth dose. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Association between birth cohort and age at receipt of hepatitis B vaccine dose 1, and receipt by 19 months of age of all recommended vaccines. RESULTS: The proportion of US infants who received dose 1 of hepatitis B vaccine at birth declined from 47% among those born 7 to 12 months before the suspension to 11% among those born during the suspension. Birth-dose coverage remained significantly lower in the year after the suspension was lifted (23% in the first 6 months and 33% in months 7-12). Coverage with 3 doses of hepatitis B vaccine by 19 months of age declined from 88% among those born 7 to 12 months before the suspension to 81% among those born during the suspension and 85% among those born in the 6 months after the suspension, but returned to baseline levels for those born 7 to 12 months after the suspension was lifted. These reductions represent 750,000 fewer newborns vaccinated during 2000 compared with 1998, and an excess 182,000 children undervaccinated for hepatitis B at 19 months of age compared with 1998 coverage levels. Coverage with other recommended vaccinations did not decline over this time. CONCLUSIONS: Reductions in hepatitis B vaccine birth-dose coverage persisted after recommendations were made to resume previous newborn vaccination practices. Although the recommendation to complete the series by 19 months of age was never changed, infants born between July and December 1999 were less likely to have completed the series by 19 months, compared with infants born during the previous year. The lack of impact on other vaccinations suggests that public confidence in immunization remained strong.

Cohort Studies↗

PubMed2006

Differences in review quality and recommendations for publication between peer reviewers suggested by authors or by editors.

CONTEXT: Many journals give authors who submit papers the opportunity to suggest reviewers. Use of these reviewers varies by journal and little is known about the quality of the reviews they produce. OBJECTIVE: To compare author- and editor-suggested reviewers to investigate differences in review quality and recommendations for publication. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Observational study of original research papers sent for external review at 10 biomedical journals. Editors were instructed to make decisions about their choice of reviewers in their usual manner. Journal administrators then requested additional reviews from the author's list of suggestions according to a strict protocol. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Review quality using the Review Quality Instrument and the proportion of reviewers recommending acceptance (including minor revision), revision, or rejection. RESULTS: There were 788 reviews for 329 manuscripts. Review quality (mean difference in Review Quality Instrument score, -0.05; P = .27) did not differ significantly between author- and editor-suggested reviewers. The author-suggested reviewers were more likely to recommend acceptance (odds ratio, 1.64; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-2.66) or revise (odds ratio, 2.66; 95% confidence interval, 1.43-4.97). This difference was larger in the open reviews of BMJ than among the blinded reviews of other journals for acceptance (P = .02). Where author- and editor-suggested reviewers differed in their recommendations, the final editorial decision to accept or reject a study was evenly balanced (50.9% of decisions consistent with the preferences of the author-suggested reviewers). CONCLUSIONS: Author- and editor-suggested reviewers did not differ in the quality of their reviews, but author-suggested reviewers tended to make more favorable recommendations for publication. Editors can be confident that reviewers suggested by authors will complete adequate reviews of manuscripts, but should be cautious about relying on their recommendations for publication.

Authorship↗

PubMed2006

Recommendations for the care of individuals with an inherited predisposition to Lynch syndrome: a systematic review.

CONTEXT: About 2% of all colorectal cancer occurs in the context of the autosomal dominantly inherited Lynch syndrome, which is due to mutations in mismatch repair genes. Potential risk-reducing interventions are recommended for individuals known to have these mutations. OBJECTIVES: To review cancer risks and data on screening efficacy in the context of Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer) and to provide recommendations for clinical management for affected families, based on available evidence and expert opinion. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION: A systematic literature search using PubMed and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, reference list review of retrieved articles, manual searches of relevant articles, and direct communication with other researchers in the field. Search terms included hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer, Lynch syndrome, microsatellite instability, mismatch repair genes, and terms related to the biology of Lynch syndrome. Only peer-reviewed, full-text, English-language articles concerning human subjects published between January 1, 1996, and February 2006 were included. The US Preventive Services Task Force's 2-tier system was adapted to describe the quality of evidence and to assign strength to the recommendations for each guideline. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The evidence supports colonoscopic surveillance for individuals with Lynch syndrome, although the optimal age at initiation and frequency of examinations is unresolved. Colonoscopy is recommended every 1 to 2 years starting at ages 20 to 25 years (age 30 years for those with MSH6 mutations), or 10 years younger than the youngest age of the person diagnosed in the family. While fully acknowledging absence of demonstrated efficacy, the following are also recommended annually: endometrial sampling and transvaginal ultrasound of the uterus and ovaries (ages 30-35 years); urinalysis with cytology (ages 25-35 years); history, examination, review of systems, education and genetic counseling regarding Lynch syndrome (age 21 years). Regular colonoscopy was favored for at-risk persons without colorectal neoplasia. For individuals who will undergo surgical resection of a colon cancer, subtotal colectomy is favored. Evidence supports the efficacy of prophylactic hysterectomy and oophorectomy. CONCLUSIONS: The past 10 years have seen major advances in the understanding of Lynch syndrome. Current recommendations regarding cancer screening and prevention require careful consultation between clinicians, clinical cancer genetic services, and well-informed patients.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

The impact of a multidisciplinary breast cancer center on recommendations for patient management: the University of Pennsylvania experience.

BACKGROUND: Advances in the diagnosis and treatment of breast carcinoma have led to a multidisciplinary approach to management for patients with breast carcinoma. To assess the effect of this approach, the authors performed an evaluation for a cohort of patients examined in a multidisciplinary breast cancer center. METHODS: An analysis was performed for the records of 75 consecutive women with 77 breast lesions examined in consultation in a multidisciplinary breast cancer center between January and June 1998. Each patient's case was evaluated by a panel consisting of a medical oncologist, surgical oncologist, radiation oncologist, pathologist, diagnostic radiologist, and, when indicated, plastic surgeon. A comprehensive history and physical examination was performed, and the relevant mammograms, pathology slides, and medical records were reviewed. Treatment recommendations made before this evaluation were compared with the consensus recommendations made by the panel. RESULTS: For the 75 patients, the multidisciplinary panel disagreed with the treatment recommendations from the outside physicians in 32 cases (43%), and agreed in 41 cases (55%). Two patients (3%) had no treatment recommendation before consultation. For the 32 patients with a disagreement, the treatment recommendations were breast-conservation treatment instead of mastectomy (n = 13; 41%) or reexcision (n = 2; 6%); further workup instead of immediate definitive treatment (n = 10; 31%); treatment based on major change in diagnosis on pathology review (n = 3; 9%); addition of postmastectomy radiation treatment (n = 3; 9%); or addition of hormonal therapy (n = 1; 3%). CONCLUSIONS: The multidisciplinary breast cancer evaluation program provided an integrated program in which individual patients were evaluated by a team of physicians and led to a change in treatment recommendation for 43% (32 of 75) of the patients examined. This multidisciplinary program provided important second opinions for many patients with breast carcinoma.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Trends of selected malformations in relation to folic acid recommendations and fortification: an international assessment.

BACKGROUND: Two crucial issues relative to the benefits and impact of folic acid in the prevention of birth defects are whether supplementation recommendations alone, without fortification, are effective in reducing the population-wide rates of neural tube defects (NTDs), and whether such policies can reduce the occurrence of other birth defects. Using data from 15 registries, we assessed rates and trends of 14 major defects, including NTDs, in areas with official recommendations or fortification to assess the effectiveness of recommendations and fortification on a wide range of major birth defects. METHODS: We evaluated surveillance data through 2003 on major birth defects from population-based registries from Europe, North America, and Australia. All included ascertainment of pregnancy terminations (where legal). Trends before and after policies or fortification were assessed via Poisson regression and were compared via rate ratios. RESULTS: Significant changes in trends were seen for NTDs in areas with fortification but not in areas with supplementation recommendations alone. For other major birth defects, there was an overall lack of major trend changes after recommendations or fortification. However, some significant declines were observed for select birth defects in individual areas. CONCLUSIONS: Recommendations alone remain an ineffective approach in translating the known protective effect of folic acid in population-wide decline in NTD rates. Fortification appears to be effective in reducing NTDs. The effect on other birth defects remains unclear.

Dietary Supplements↗

PubMed2005

Differences in pediatric oncologists' estimates of curability and treatment recommendations for patients with advanced cancer.

BACKGROUND: When goals of therapy for children with advanced cancer are called into question, physician recommendations regarding treatment goals have been shown to be important for families. However, there has been no demonstration of the degree of variation between pediatric oncologists' recommendations in such situations. PROCEDURE: We provided 48 pediatric oncologists with two identical case histories and identical prognostic data from the literature. Individual interviews were then performed to assess variation in (1) recommended treatment goal, (2) perceived chances for cure, and (3) degree to which further curative intervention would be considered desirable for each patient. RESULTS: There was a large variability in each of the areas examined. For both patients, there was wide divergence (2:1 and 2:3) in whether to recommend cure as the goal of treatment. There were also differences in physician estimates for likelihood of cure for each patient. Finally, even among those with identical estimates for likelihood of cure, there were differences in the treatment goals physicians would recommend and how strongly they would counsel for them. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that even with identical clinical data and prognostic evidence from the literature, pediatric oncologists vary widely in their recommendations regarding goals of treatment for children with advanced cancer.

Child↗

PubMed2005

Perioperative platelet transfusion: recommendations of the Agence Française de Sécurité Sanitaire des Produits de Santé (AFSSaPS) 2003.

PURPOSE: To present the recommendations of the Agence Française de Sécurité Sanitaire des Produits de Santé (AFSSaPS; French Safety Agency for Health Products). METHODS: A panel of experts reviewed and graded the literature on platelet transfusions; recommendations were formulated. MAIN FINDINGS: Threshold platelet counts (PC) for transfusions in the perioperative context have not been clearly defined and should be determined by the existence of hemorrhagic risk factors. In the case of commonly practiced invasive procedures, the recommendation is to transfuse in order to achieve PC > 50,000xmicroL(-1). In the absence of platelet dysfunction, regardless of the type of surgery, the standard hemorrhagic risk threshold for surgery is 50,000xmicroL(-1). It has not been proven that the risk threshold is different according to the type of surgery. For neurosurgery and ophthalmologic surgery involving the posterior segment of the eye, a PC of 100,000xmicroL(-1) is required. For axial regional anesthesia, a PC of 50,000xmicroL(-1) is sufficient for spinal anesthesia; a PC of 80,000xmicroL(-1) has been proposed for epidurals. During massive transfusion, prophylactic platelet infusion cannot be recommended beyond a loss of two blood volumes in less than 24 hr (Professional Consensus). As for the therapeutic transfusion of plasma and/or platelets, as much as possible, platelet deficit should be documented with test results (PC and fibrinogen) before transfusing. In the event of bleeding, platelet transfusion may precede plasma infusion. However, although this recommendation has been the subject of several professional consensus agreements, it is not based on any randomized studies. CONCLUSION: Threshold PC for perioperative transfusions have not been clearly defined and most recommendations are the result of a professional consensus.

Blood Coagulation Disorders↗

PubMed2000

Recommended care for young people (15-19 years) after suicide attempts in certain European countries.

Data on recommended care for young people aged 15-19 years after attempted suicide from nine European research centres during the period 1989-1992 were analysed in terms of gender, history of previous suicide attempt and methods used. Altogether 438 suicide attempts made by 353 boys and 1,102 suicide attempts made by 941 girls were included. Analyses of the total data from all centres showed that young people with a history of previous suicide attempt and those using violent methods had significantly higher chance of being recommended aftercare than first-time attempters or those choosing self-poisoning. There were no significant differences of being recommended care between genders. Logistic regression analyses of the material were performed and the results were similar. Both having previous attempted suicide (odds ratio 2.0, 95% CI 1.53-2.61) and using "hard" methods (odds ratio 1.71, 95% CI 1.49-1.96) were significantly associated with increased possibility of being recommended aftercare. When individual centres were analysed, large disparities of recommended care after suicide attempts were found and there were no uniform criteria of recommending care for young suicide attempters in Europe.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2002

New IUPAC (International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry) recommendations on the measurement of pH - background and essentials.

The IUPAC Recommendations on pH (1985) have serious metrological deficiencies (recommendation of two pH scales and of several pH definitions and procedures to measure pH). Background and essential features of new recommendations, which replace the 1985 document, are reported in this paper. The new document is strictly based on metrological principles. pH is defined (notionally) by the negative logarithm of the hydrogen ion activity according to Sørensen and Linderstrøm-Lang (1924), that is pH=-lg a(H). Because pH is a single ion quantity it is immeasurable and is therefore experimentally verified, with stated uncertainties, by pH(PS) values of primary standard buffer solutions. The assignment of pH(PS) is carried out in a Harned cell (without transference), which is defined as a primary method of measurement, and involves the Bates-Guggenheim convention. pH(PS) is thus a conventional quantity. Consideration of the uncertainty of the Bates-Guggenhein convention, however, permits its incorporation into the internationally accepted SI system of measurement. Comparison of the pH of secondary buffer solutions with pH(PS) values in recommended cells with transference yields secondary standards, whose pH(SS) can be traced back to pH(PS) and consequently to the definition of pH. The traceability chain is continued "downwards" by practical cells with transference containing glass electrodes for the measurement of pH(X) values of unknown solutions, for which three calibration procedures are recommended. The measurement of pH is thus represented by the traceability chain pH(X)-->pH(SS)-->pH(PS)-->pH as defined, each step having stated uncertainties. This hierarchical system of measurement excludes any pH 'scale'. Tabulated pH(PS) values are given as examples, and it is recommended that actual pH(PS) and pH(SS) be taken from certificates, which are to accompany each lot of certified reference material (CRM). Target uncertainties and examples of their calculation, a sign convention for pH cells and conventions for presenting cell schemes are given in the new document.

Buffers↗

PubMed2002

[Exercise recommendation and catecholamines in patients with coronary artery disease].

Exercise training for patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) is recommended in a wide range between 40-85% of maximum functional capacity (MFC) or 55-90% of maximum heart rate (HR). During exercise, high levels of catecholamines and metabolic acidosis could induce arrhythmia and ischemia. But catecholamines have never been determined in CAD during constant load exercise in the upper range of recommended intensities. In 11 CAD patients (age 58+/-8 years, BMI 26.1+/-4.0 kg x m(-2), NYHA I n=7, II n=4) we tested the maximum functional capacity (MFC), norepinephrine (NE), epinephrine (E) and blood lactate ([Lac(-)](B)) in a symptom-limited incremental ergometer test. Related to the exercise recommendation, the kinetics of NE, E and [Lac(-)](B) were determined in two 30 min constant load tests in randomized order: one was performed at the anaerobic lactate threshold (CTAT), a second was performed 10% above the individual threshold intensity (CT+10%). In the incremental tests maximum workload and VO(2) were 141+/-54 W and 1766+/-532 ml x min(-1), respectively (85+/-22% of normal; [Lac(-)](B) 5.7+/-1.9 mmol x l(-1), HR 138+/-28 b x min(-1), NE 11.7+/-5.1, E 1.6+/-1.4 nmol x l(-1)). In CTAT the anaerobic threshold (63+/-7% of MFC) represented the mean range of recommended exercise intensity for CAD (40-85%) and could be validated as steady-state intensity because catecholamines and [Lac(-)](B) concentrations remained constant after the initial increase (workload 88+/-35 W, [Lac(-)](B) 3.3+/-1.4 mmol x l(-1), HR 117+/- 23 b x min(-1), NE 8.3+/-3.5, E 0.8+/- 0.7 nmol x l(-1)). In all patients CT+10% (71+/-7% of MFC) led to a continuous rise in [Lac(-)](B), to a NE overload and to earlier exhaustion, although the intensities were in the recommended training range (workload 100+/-38 W, [Lac(-)](B) 5.8+/- 1.9 mmol x l(-1), HR 129+/- 29 b x min(-1), NE 13.9+/-6.9, E 1.5+/- 1.7 nmol x l(-1); p<0.01 against CTAT for all except E). Conclusions In the upper range of recommended training intensity for CAD patients, norepinephrine and lactate were higher during endurance exercise than at MFC in incremental tests. Endurance exercise with intensities >70% of MFC could overload the cardiac patient and increase the risk of arryhthmia and ischemia. Therefore, endurance exercise should be performed below 70% of MFC or below 85% of maximum HR, respectively, whereas higher intensities should apply to interval exercise.

Aged↗

PubMed2005

[Comparison of international recommendations for the recognition of asymptomatic high risk patients for a heart attack in Germany].

The recommendations of the International Task Force for the Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease/International Atherosclerosis Society (ITF/IAS), the US-American Adult Treatment Panel III of the National Cholesterol Education Programs (ATP III) and the 3rd Joint European Guidelines (3JE) for the prevention coronary heart disease (CHD) show good agreement in tertiary prevention. All three guidelines recommend that patients with manifest CHD should have a blood pressure below 140/90 mm Hg and LDL-cholesterol below 2.6 mmol/l (100 mg/dl). By contrast, the three recommendations differ with respect to the prevention of cardiovascular events in asymptomatic high risk patients (secondary prevention), notably in the strategy to be used for risk assessment. Both the ITF/IAS guidelines and the 3JE guidelines can be adapted and realized in the various European countries. We therefore compared the prognostic values of the three recommendations by applying them to the data of male participants of the Prospective Cardiovascular Munster (PROCAM) Study. The ITF/IAS recommendations show the highest specificity (94.5%), positive predictive value (32.0%) and diagnostic efficacy (90.5%); the 3JE guidelines have the highest sensitivity (64.6%) but lowest specificity (77.9%), positive predictive value (17.5%) and diagnostic efficacy (77.0%). The application of the 3JE recommendations would target 25% of German men aged 35-65 years as cardiovascular high risk patients, by contrast to 7.5% through application of the ITF/IAS guidelines. In view of the limited resources in the public health systemthe application of the ITF/IAS guidelines in Germany appears more appropriate.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

Clinical-practice recommendations for the management of bowel obstruction in patients with end-stage cancer.

The paper highlights a series of questions that doctors need to consider when faced with end-stage cancer patients with bowel obstruction: Is the patient fit for surgery? Is there a place for stenting? Is it necessary to use a venting nasogastric tube (NGT) in inoperable patients? What drugs are indicated for symptom control, what is the proper route for their administration and which can be administered in association? When should a venting gastrostomy be considered? What is the role of total parenteral nutrition (TPN) and parenteral hydration (PH)? A working group was established to review issues relating to bowel obstruction in end-stage cancer and to make recommendations for management. A steering group was established by the (multidisciplinary) Board of Directors of the European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC) to select members of the expert panel, who were required to have specific clinical and research interests relating to the topic and to have published significant papers on advanced cancer patients in the last 5 years, or to have particular clinical expertise that is recognised internationally. The final constitution of this group was approved by the Board of the EAPC. This Working Group was made up of English, French and Italian physicians involved in the field of palliative care for advanced and terminal cancer patients; and of English, American and Italian surgeons who also specialized in artificial nutrition (Dr. Bozzetti) and a professor of health economics. We applied a systematic review methodology that showed the relative lack of RCTs in this area and the importance of retrospective and clinical reports from different authors in different countries. The brief was to review published data but also to provide clinical opinion where data were lacking. The recommendations reflect specialist clinical practice in the countries represented. Each member of the group was allocated a specific question and briefed to review the literature and produce a position paper on the indications, advantages and disadvantages of each symptomatic treatment. The position papers were circulated and then debated at a meeting held in Athens and attended by all panel members. The group reviewed all the available data, discussed the evidence and discussed what practical recommendations could be derived from it. An initial outline of the results of the review and recommendations was produced. Where there were gaps in the evidence, consensus was achieved by debate. Only unanimous conclusions have been incorporated. Subsequently the recommendations were drawn together by Carla Ripamonti (Chairperson) and Robert Twycross (Co-Chair) and refined with input from all panel members. The recommendations have been endorsed by the Board of Directors of the EAPC. It was concluded that surgery should not be undertaken routinely in patients with poor prognostic criteria, such as intra-abdominal carcinomatosis, poor performance status and massive ascites. A nasogastric tube should be used only as a temporary measure. Medical measures such as analgesics, anti-secretory drugs and anti-emetics should be used alone or in combination to relieve symptoms. A venting gastrostomy should be considered if drugs fail to reduce vomiting to an acceptable level. TPN should be considered only for patients who may die of starvation rather than from tumour spread. PH is sometimes indicated to correct nausea, whereas regular mouth care is the treatment of choice for dry mouth. A collaborative approach involving both surgeons and physicians can offer patients an individualized and appropriate symptom management plan.

Humans↗

PubMed2006

Physician and patient characteristics associated with outpatient breast cancer screening recommendations in the United States: analysis of the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey Data 1996-2004.

BACKGROUND: The primary goal of breast cancer screening tests is to find cancer at an early stage before a person has any symptoms. Evidence suggests that screening examinations such as mammography and clinical breast examinations (CBE) are effective in early detection of breast cancer. Physician recommendation is an important reason many women undergo screening. This study examined the physician and patients related factors associated with physician recommendations for breast cancer screening in the United States (US) outpatient settings. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) from 1996-2004. Women aged >or=40 years were included in the study sample. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to study the objectives. RESULTS: Weighted analysis indicated that physicians performed 198 million CBEs and made 110 million mammography recommendations over the study period (1996-2004). Patients' age, duration of visits, history of previous breast cancer diagnosis, and source of insurance were significant predictors of screening recommendations in this population. Obstetricians and gynecologists were more likely to perform a CBE and recommend mammography than other specialty physicians. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicated that there were certain disparities regarding the physician recommendations of breast cancer screening for women in the US outpatient settings.

Adult↗