SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “REPRESSION”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 469 records · Page 26Linked to original sources

PubMed1995

Transcriptional regulation by an upstream repression sequence from the yeast enolase gene ENO1.

The activity of an upstream repression sequence (URS element) that mediates a 20-fold repression of ENO1 expression in cells grown in a medium containing glucose was characterized. Sequences that are sufficient for orientation-dependent ENO1 URS element activity were mapped between positions -241 and -126 relative to the ENO1 transcriptional initiation site. The ENO1 URS element repressed transcription of the yeast CYC1 gene when positioned between the CYC1 upstream activation sequences (UAS elements) and TATAAA boxes. The ENO1 URS element failed to repress transcription of the wild-type yeast enolase gene ENO2; however, expression of an ENO2 gene lacking one of the ENO2 UAS elements was efficiently repressed by the ENO1 URS element, suggesting that the URS element interferes with the transcriptional activation by some, but not all, UAS elements. In contrast to the ENO1 gene, the ENO1 URS element repressed CYC1 and ENO2 expression in cells grown on glucose or glycerol plus lactate. Evidence is presented that the ENO1 URS element also functions during stationary growth phase.

Cytochrome c Group↗

PubMed1997

Identification of the transcriptional repression domain of nuclear factor 1-A.

We previously showed that nuclear factor 1-A (NF1-A) binds to the silencer elements in the glutathione transferase P (GST-P) gene, and the carboxy terminal region of NF1-A represses the transcription activity of human metallothionein IIA (hMTIIA) promoter. In this study, we identified a repression region which is divided into two 100 amino acid domains (RD1 and RD2). RD1 increased the repression activity of RD2 to the hMTIIA promoter activity. The NF1-A repression domain inhibited the promoter activities of not only the hMTIIA gene but also those of the GST-P and CCAAT/enhancer binding protein delta genes. RD1 and RD2 had abundant serine and glycine residues, and proline and serine residues, respectively. Whereas some repression domains identified previously are enriched with alanine, proline, or serine, and are associated with the general transcription factors, the NF1-A repression domains did not interact with transcription factor IIB, TATA-binding protein (TBP), or TBP-associated factors in vitro.

CCAAT-Enhancer-Binding Proteins↗

PubMed2001

Repression of the HSP70B promoter by NFIL6, Ku70, and MAPK involves three complementary mechanisms.

We have studied mechanisms of HSP70 gene regulation at 37 degrees C by the cellular factors NF-IL6 and Ku70. As both factors repress HSF1, we first examined whether phosphorylation on serine 303 and 307 of HSF1 by MAPK and GSK3, which has known to inhibit HSF1, was involved in the repression. However, repression by NF-IL6 was found using HSF1 mutants S303G and S307G refractory to the effects of MAPK and GSK3. We then examined whether NF-IL6 repressed HSP70B by a mechanism resembling Ku proteins. However, in Ku-deficient cells, NF-IL6 was still able to displace HSF1 from heat shock element (HSE) and repressed HSF1 activation. In addition, activation of the HSP 70B promoter by wild type, S303G, or S307G HSF1 was observed to be much more pronounced in Ku-deficient cells. In vitro translated Ku70 interacted with HSF1 by binding to and displacing it from HSE. These data indicate that the repression of the HSP70B promoter by NF-IL6, Ku70, and MAPK occurs independently of each other and involves three complementary mechanisms.

Amino Acid Substitution↗

PubMed2001

In vitro analysis of transcriptional repression of the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter.

Transcription of the proviral DNA of mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) is induced by several classes of hormone-activated steroid receptor proteins. Basal promoter activity in the absence of receptor-mediated activation is selectively repressed by a distal negative regulatory element (dNRE) centered approximately 400 bp upstream of the transcription initiation site. An in vitro transcription system based on synthetic T-free cassette templates was developed to assess MMTV promoter activity, and dNRE-mediated repression was partially reconstituted with this system. Repression was observed with templates in which the dNRE was present in several sequence contexts. The activity of transcription preinitiation complexes formed in vitro in the presence of the dNRE could not be distinguished from that of complexes formed in its absence as assessed by the kinetics of transcript accumulation after addition of nucleoside triphosphates to preformed preinitiation complexes. dNRE-mediated repression in vitro appeared to be the result of decreased efficiency of assembly of functional transcription complexes on the MMTV promoter. However, repression could not be explained by inhibition of assembly of TATA-binding protein or transcription factor IIB into transcription complexes, as neither protein decreased the extent of repression when supplied in excess as a purified recombinant protein.

Gene Expression Regulation, Viral↗

PubMed1996

Extracellular cAMP depletion triggers stalk gene expression in Dictyostelium: disparities in developmental timing and dose dependency indicate that prespore induction and stalk repression by cAMP are mediated by separate signaling pathways.

During Dictyostelium development, amoebae differentiate into spores and stalk cells. Earlier studies showed that extracellular cAMP is essential for induction of prespore differentiation and that cAMP represses stalk gene expression in vitro. We show that the repressive pathway is operative in vivo, because activation of the stalk-specific promoter region of the ecmB gene is strongly enhanced by overexpression of a phosphodiesterase that depletes extracellular cAMP. To test whether a single cAMP transduction pathway controls the choice between prespore or stalk cell differentiation, we compared the timing and dose dependency of the effects of cAMP on both responses. Cells acquire competence for cAMP repression of ecmB promoter activity 4 hr later than for prespore gene induction. Half-maximal prespore induction requires 30 microM stable cAMP analog Sp-cAMPs, while ecmB induction is half-maximally repressed by 200 nM Sp-cAMPs, which is equivalent to about 3 to 13 nM cAMP. At concentrations exceeding 10 microM, Sp-cAMPs stimulates ecmB expression from the intact promoter, but not from the stalk-specific subregion. These data suggest that distinct signaling pathways operating at different developmental stages control induction of prespore genes on one hand and repression of stalk genes on the other. Both stalk gene repression and prespore gene induction by Sp-cAMPs are antagonized by millimolar adenosine concentrations. However, an adenosine analog that is resistant to extracellular metabolism is active at 10 microM. Since adenosine inhibits cAMP binding to cAMP receptors, it may facilitate stalk gene expression by reducing the perceived cAMP concentration.

Adenosine↗

PubMed1996

Repression of RNA polymerase II and III transcription during M phase of the cell cycle.

Nuclear transcription is repressed when eukaryotic cells enter mitosis. Using Xenopus egg extracts shifted to the mitotic state with recombinant cyclin B1 protein, we have been able to reproduce mitotic repression of transcription in vitro. Active RNA polymerase III transcription is observed in interphase extracts in the absence of added cyclin, but is strongly repressed by the induction of cdc2/cyclin B (maturation/mitosis promoting factor, MPF) kinase activity in the mitotic extract. Studies with protein kinase inhibitors show that protein phosphorylation is required for repression. Add-back experiments indicate that repression of class III gene transcription is due to inactivation of the transcription factor TFIIIB. TFIIIB is composed of the TATA-box binding protein (TBP) and TBP-associated factors of 75 and 92 kDa. In the present study, we show that TBP and a polypeptide of 92 kDa are substrates of the mitotic kinase in highly purified TF- IIIB fractions. We also show that a phosphatase present in the Xenopus egg extract can reactivate transcription after repression by the mitotic kinases. This result suggests a mechanism for reactivation of transcription after exit from mitosis into the G1 phase of the cell cycle. As for pol III genes, purified cdc2/cyclin B kinase is sufficient to inhibit transcription by RNA polymerase II in a reconstituted transcription system containing the basal transcription factors and polymerase.

Animals↗

PubMed2001

Functional knockout of the corepressor CtBP by the second exon of adenovirus E1a relieves repression of transcription.

The C-terminal binding protein (CtBP) acts as a transcriptional corepressor upon recruitment to transcriptional regulators. In contrast, interaction between CtBP and the adenovirus E1A protein is required for efficient activation of E1A-responsive genes, suggesting that E1A might block CtBP-mediated repression. Recruitment of CtBP to a promoter, either as a Gal4CtBP fusion or through an interaction with a Gal4 fusion protein expressing the CtBP interacting domain (CID) of E1A, resulted in transcriptional repression. The second exon of E1A, containing the CID, alleviated repression by Gal4E1ACID-recruited CtBP, but not Gal4CtBP-mediated repression, suggesting that E1A prevented repression by blocking promoter recruitment of CtBP. E1ACID was also sufficient to derepress transcription from several cotransfected promoter constructs. Furthermore, inducible expression of E1ACID in established cell lines resulted in significant changes of endogenous gene expression, possibly by sequestration of CtBP. Together, these data indicated that CtBP might act as a wide-range regulator of transcription. Although CtBP was shown to interact with histone deacetylases (HDACs), transcriptional repression by a Gal4CtBP fusion protein was not sensitive to inhibition of HDACs by trichostatin A (TSA). In contrast, TSA eliminated E1ACID derepression of E1A second exon-responsive promoters. Although the reason for this difference remains to be experimentally verified, it is possible that the requirement for HDACs might differ depending on the mechanism by which CtBP becomes promoter recruited.

Adenovirus E1A Proteins↗

PubMed1999

Smubp-2 represses the Epstein-Barr virus lytic switch promoter.

Smubp-2 is a novel transcription factor that was first identified through its interaction with the immunoglobulin Smu region (Mizuta et al., 1993) and has been cloned by virtue of its binding to two 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate-responsive elements in the Epstein-Barr virus immediate-early BZLF1 promoter (Gulley et al., 1997). In this report, we examined the effect of Smubp-2 overexpression on BZLF1 prom oter activity. Overexpression of Smubp-2 in the B lymphocyte cell line BJAB caused repression of the BZLF1 gene promoter. A 14-bp region that partially overlaps with a 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate-responsive element was required for maximal repression by Smubp-2, but some repression was also seen with a minimal promoter containing only the BZLF1 promoter TATA box and an initiation site. A 30-bp fragment containing the 14-bp region could transfer Smubp-2-mediated repression to heterologous promoters. Smubp-2 was found to associate with the basal transcription factor TATA binding protein (TBP) and to disrupt the formation of a stable TBP-TFIIA-DNA complex on the BZLF1 promoter TATA box and the adenovirus E1B promoter TATA box. Repression of the BZLF1 promoter by overexpressed Smubp-2 was rescued by overexpression of the basal factor TFIIA. These results suggest that complete repression of the BZLF1 promoter by Smubp-2 involves disruption of a functional TBP-TFIIA-TATA box complex and requires the -93 bp-to--79 bp region of the promoter.

Cell Line↗

PubMed1992

Trans-acting factors and properly positioned DNA elements repress mating-type genes in fission yeast.

Repression of the mating-type P genes at the silent mat2-P locus in fission yeast is dependent on four cis-acting DNA elements, two on each side of the coding sequences. The mechanism by which these elements exert their influence on the mating-type promoter is studied here by insertion of a bacterial antibiotic resistance gene at several positions in the silent region. The behavior of the resistance gene itself, and the changes its insertion causes in mating-type expression, reveal that the repressive elements have a limited range of action and that the four elements have unequal effects on gene expression. Repression of the antibiotic resistance gene inside the silent region leads to an antibiotic-sensitive phenotype and facilitates the selection of resistant mutants. These mutants can de-repress the resistance gene at other positions than the one used for their selection. Strong antibiotic resistance correlates with derepression of the plasmid-borne mating-type cassette. These data argue that mat2-P repression is dependent on trans-acting factors and the positioning of the repressive DNA elements, but less dependent on the nature of the affected promoter.

Alleles↗

PubMed1998

Characterization of tTA and its functional domain in tetracycline repressor-mediated gene repression system.

To elucidate of role(s) of tTA as a repressor in the tTA-mediated gene repression system, we introduced mutations into the acidic domain of VP16 and examined the effects of such various mutations. In the transient repression experiment, a region containing 34 amino acids of the activation domain of VP16 (412-456) which interacts with TFIIB was found to be necessary and sufficient for the tTA-mediated repression of gene expression. However, in the experiment to investigate the fact that tTA-regulated repression is related to the activation function of VP 16, we found that the repression abilities of tTA derivatives did not correlate exactly with their activation abilities. Therefore, we conclude that increased mass of VP16 in tTA might be also important for efficient repression in addition to functional domain of VP16.

Blotting, Western↗

PubMed2003

Translation repression by antisense sequences.

Antisense sequences that hybridize to messenger RNA can inhibit target gene expression in a variety of ways. The best-known antisense mechanisms trigger messenger RNA (mRNA) degradation; however, translation repression by ribosome interference is a common natural antisense mechanism. In bacteria, there are fascinating examples of cis-encoded and trans-encoded antisense sequences that reversibly repress translation. In eukaryotes, microRNAs that bind 3'UTR target sequences also repress translation, although the mechanism is unclear. An important feature of translation repression is that the mRNA can remain intact during periods of repression, and rapid expression switching can occur in response to cellular and environmental signals. Recent genome analyses indicate many new short noncoding RNAs with predicted antisense activities. Therefore, translation repression by antisense sequences is likely to be a common and important form of posttranscriptional gene control, and such natural mechanisms provide a basis for the development of synthetic antisense gene control in research and drug development.

Animals↗

PubMed1998

Carbon catabolite repression of invertase during batch cultivations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: the role of glucose, fructose, and mannose.

When Saccharomyces cerevisiae are grown on a mixture of glucose and another fermentable sugar such as sucrose, maltose or galactose, the metabolism is diauxic, i.e. glucose is metabolized first, whereas the other sugars are metabolized when glucose is exhausted. This phenomenon is a consequence of glucose repression, or more generally, catabolite repression. Besides glucose, the hexoses fructose and mannose are generally also believed to trigger catabolite repression. In this study, batch fermentations of S. cerevisiae in mixtures of sucrose and either glucose, fructose or mannose were performed. It was found that the utilization of sucrose is inhibited by concentrations of either glucose or fructose higher than 5 g/l, and thus that glucose and fructose are equally capable of exerting catabolite repression. However, sucrose was found to be hydrolyzed to glucose and fructose, even when the mannose concentration was as high as 17 g/l, indicating, that mannose is not a repressing sugar. It is suggested that the capability to trigger catabolite repression is connected to hexokinase PII, which is involved in the in vivo phosphorylation of glucose and fructose.

Biomass↗

PubMed1988

Transcriptional repression of an embryo-specific muscle gene.

Skeletal muscle involves both the induction and repression of gene expression. Although activation and up-regulation of several contractile protein genes has been shown to occur via transcriptional mechanisms, the mechanisms by which contractile protein genes are repressed during muscle development remain unknown. However, a post-transcriptional mechanism has been implicated in the repression of thymidine kinase expression during muscle development. The chicken cardiac troponin T (cTNT) gene is expressed in early embryonic skeletal muscle but is abruptly repressed in late embryonic/fetal development. Using run-on transcription assays we demonstrate here that cTNT gene repression occurs at the level of transcription. Thus, transcriptional as well as post-transcriptional mechanisms operate both to activate and repress gene expression during skeletal muscle development.

Actins↗

PubMed1970

Transient repression of the lac operon - the effect of a lac promoter deletion.

Experiments have been done to show whether the lac promoter delection L1, which partly alleviates catabolite repression, also affects transient repression of lac. In stain L1/F'M15 all of the beta-galactosidase is synthesized from a chromosomal gene cis to L1, whereas 98% of the thiogalactosidase transacetylase is synthesized from an episomal gene cis to an intact i-p-o region. The addition of glucose to induced cultures of strain L1/F'M15 growing in glycerol medium caused extensive transient repression of transacetylase but almost no transient repression of beta-galactosidase. In control experiments with a diploid stain of genotype p(+)z(+)a(-)/F'p(+)z(-)a(+) the two enzymes suffered equal transient repression. Thus L1 substantially relieves transient repression.

Journal Article↗

PubMed1985

Adenovirus E1a proteins repress transcription from the SV40 early promoter.

Using a transient expression assay in HeLa cells, we show that products from the adenovirus-5 E1a transcription unit repress transcription from the SV40 early promoter. The repression is unrelated to T antigen autoregulation, occurs maximally with low concentrations of E1a expression plasmid, is exerted at the transcriptional level, and requires functional E1a protein. The 289 and 243 amino acid E1a proteins are equally effective at repressing transcription. Since only the 289 amino acid protein is efficient at activating transcription, we conclude that activation and repression are separate E1a functions. We discuss possible mechanisms for E1a repression and the relationship of repression to the function of E1a in cell immortalization and transformation.

Adenoviridae↗

PubMed1993

Negative regulation of the glycoprotein hormone alpha gene promoter by thyroid hormone: mutagenesis of a proximal receptor binding site preserves transcriptional repression.

Transcription of the glycoprotein hormone alpha gene is repressed by the thyroid hormone receptor (TR) in a hormone dependent manner. Previous studies identified a TR binding site immediately downstream of the TATA box. Site directed mutagenesis and transient gene expression studies were used to evaluate the role of this TR binding site as a negative thyroid response element (nTRE). Mutagenesis of the putative negative thyroid response element (nTRE) site eliminated TR binding but failed to eliminate negative regulation by T3. A mutation which converted the putative nTRE to a higher affinity palindromic element did not enhance repression, but rather eliminated thyroid hormone dependent negative regulation. Proximal alpha promoter sequences between -100 and +44 were replaced with a heterologous thymidine kinase promoter resulting in a construct that was not repressed by T3 treatment. This finding confirmed that repression required proximal alpha promoter sequences and also indicated that repression did not occur by interference with the function of upstream the alpha gene enhancers. These studies indicate that TR binding adjacent to the TATA box is not required for T3 mediated repression of the alpha promoter and suggest that negative regulation may involve protein-protein interactions with promoter-specific transcription factors.

Animals↗

PubMed1991

A yeast protein with homology to the beta-subunit of G proteins is involved in control of heme-regulated and catabolite-repressed genes.

The product of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae AER2 gene is responsible for maintaining repression of at least two distinct regulatory pathways: heme activation/repression and catabolite repression. Mutations in the gene caused an eightfold increase in the expression of the heme-activated CYC1 gene in the absence of heme, a substantial increase in the expression of the heme-repressed ANB1 gene in the presence of heme, and a 13-fold increase in the expression of the catabolite-repressed GAL1 gene in the presence of glucose. Lesser or no increases in the expression of these genes were observed under derepressed or activation conditions. The aer2 mutations also caused a large increase in CYC7 gene expression under all conditions; this gene is subject to heme activation/repression, as well as catabolite repression. The AER2 gene was cloned and the sequence determined. The large open reading frame contiguous with the transcript from the complementing region encoded a 713-amino acid polypeptide chain with extensive homology to the beta-subunit of G proteins. The sequence revealed that AER2 is the TUP1 gene. A deletion mutation was constructed and the null phenotype was the same as the original mutants. The aer2 null mutant was shown to have increased aerobic and anaerobic levels of RNA encoding the ROX1 repressor, normally expressed only aerobically and responsible for the aerobic repression of ANB1 expression. The increase in both ROX1 and ANB1 RNAs aerobically in this mutant suggests that the repressor is nonfunctional in the mutant.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed1995

HIV Tat represses transcription through Sp1-like elements in the basal promoter.

MHC class I genes are potently repressed by HIV Tat, which transactivates the HIV LTR. Tat represses class I transcription by binding to complexes associated with a novel promoter element, consisting of Sp1-like DNA binding sites. Transcription by other Sp1-dependent promoters, such as MDR1 and the minimal SV40 promoters, is also repressed by Tat, whereas the human beta-actin promoter is neither activated by Sp1 nor repressed by Tat. Tat repression can be overcome by a strong enhancer element. Thus, the SV40 72 bp enhancer element confers protection from Tat-mediated repression on both the minimal SV40 promoter and the class I promoter. Surprisingly, Tat can activate the class I promoter in the presence of both the HIV TAR element and a strong upstream enhancer. These data demonstrate that Tat differentially affects Sp1-responsive promoters, depending on promoter architecture.

Base Sequence↗