Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Piper”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 469 records · Page 26Linked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

Paying the piper.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Costs and Cost Analysis↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[The anti-arrhythmic effect of the selective sigma-receptor antagonist DuP 734 [1-(cyclopropylmethyl)-4-(2'-(4''-fluorophenyl)-2'-oxoethyl)piper idine HBr]].

It was demonstrated on models of epinephrine-, CaCl2-, and aconitine-induced arrhythmias that the sigma-receptor antagonist DuP734 possesses high antiarrhythmic activity in a dose of 1 mg/kg. The sigma-receptor agonist-(+)SKF10,047 promoted the development of ventricular fibrillation. Atropine had no effect on the antiarrhythmic properties of DuP734. "Chemical sympathectomy" of the myocardium with the ganglion-blocking agent hexamethonium also did not affect the proarrhythmic properties of (+)SKF10,047. It is supposed that selective sigma-receptor blocking agents may be highly effective antiarrhythmic drugs.

Aconitine↗
PubMed1976

Paying the piper.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Education, Nursing↗
PubMed2005

[Preliminary study on the release of DNA from Pseudomona aeruginosa induced by piperacillin/tazobactam in vitro].

OBJECTIVE: To observe the release of DNA from Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) induced by different concentrations of piperacillin/tazobactam (Piper) in vitro. METHODS: The minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC) of Piper against 1244 strain (ATCC 27317) of P. aeruginosa were determined, respectively. This strain of P. aeruginosa was separately cultured with Piper in different concentrations at 37 degrees C for 4 h and 24 h. The samples of cultural supernatant were filtered and electrophoresis was conducted in 1.8% agarose with SYBR Gold stain. Then the images of the gel sheets were photographed. RESULTS: This strain of P. aeruginosa was sensitive to Piper. The bacterial DNA was not detected in 4-h cultured P. aeruginosa either with or without Piper by this method. The bacterial DNA molecules could be detected in 24 h samples in cultures without Piper, and they were displayed in two zones of molecular weight over 2000 base pairs (bp) and lower than 100 bp. Similar results were observed when the MIC of piper (0.002, 0.004 g/L) were under the MIC measured at the 3rd time (0.008 g/L), but there was much more bacterial DNA with molecular weight lower than 100 bp. When Piper concentration was higher than its MIC, only smaller quantities of bacterial DNA in the area with molecular weight lower than 400 bp could be detected in 24-h culture samples. CONCLUSION: A certain amount of bacterial DNA was released from P. aeruginosa under its natural growth circumstance. Different concentrations of Piper showed different effects on DNA release, in regard to its quantity and molecular weight, from P. aeruginosa cultures.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed2004

Constituents of areca chewing related to esophageal cancer risk in Taiwanese men.

Two most common types of areca chewing are noted in Taiwan: raw betel fruit with Piper betle inflorescence or folded in betel leaf. Piper betle inflorescence contains carcinogens, whereas betel leaf includes anticarcinogenic agents. One hundred and twenty-six esophageal squamous-cell-carcinoma patients and 279 healthy controls, all men, were analyzed. Areca chewers were 4.4 times (95% CI, 2.2-8.8) more likely to develop esophageal cancer than non-chewers. Sixty-five of the patients were areca chewers, of which, 61 (93.9%) chewed areca with Piper betle inflorescence, none chewed it with betel leaf and four (6.1%) chewed both. Of the 24 controls who were chewers, 10 (41.7%), three (12.5%) and 11 (45.8%) chewed areca with Piper betle inflorescence, betel leaf, and both, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that subjects who chewed areca with Piper betle inflorescence were 24.4 times (95% CI 3.9-154.4) more likely to develop esophageal cancer than those who chewed areca with betel leaf or with both leaf and inflorescence. Our epidemiologic findings suggest parts of the same Piper plant contains carcinogenic and anticarcinogenic substances.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

Kava extract for treating anxiety.

BACKGROUND: Synthetic anxiolytic drugs are effective for anxiety, but they are burdened with adverse events. Constraints on resources and time often render treatments such as psychological interventions impracticable. Thus, an effective and safe oral medication would be of considerable interest and a welcome addition to the therapeutic repertoire. OBJECTIVES: To systematically review the evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of kava extract for the symptomatic treatment of anxiety. SEARCH STRATEGY: Computerized literature searches were performed in the databases Medline, Embase, Biosis, AMED, CISCOM and the Cochrane Library (all from their respective inception to June 1998). The search terms used were kava, kawa, kavain, Piper methysticum and Rauschpfeffer (German common name for Piper methysticum). Manufacturers of kava preparations and experts on the subject were contacted and asked to contribute published and unpublished material. In addition, our own files were searched and the bibliographies of all of the studies identified were scanned for further trials. There were no restrictions regarding the language of publication. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized, double-blind trials of oral kava extract mono-preparations for the treatment of anxiety were included. Trials comparing kava with placebo were included. Trials assessing kava as one of several active constituents in a combination preparation or as a part of a combination treatment were excluded. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: All publications were blinded prior to assessment by a person not involved in the study. Data on patients, interventions, methods, results and adverse events were extracted systematically. Methodological quality of all trials was evaluated using the scoring system developed by Jadad and colleagues. The screening of studies, selection, data extraction and the assessment of methodological quality were performed independently by the two reviewers. Disagreements in the evaluation of individual trials were resolved through discussion. MAIN RESULTS: Seven trials met the inclusion criteria. All of the reviewed trials suggest superiority of kava extract over placebo. The meta-analysis of three studies using the Hamilton Anxiety Score as a common outcome measure suggests a significant differential treatment effect in favour of kava extract (weighted mean difference: 9.69, 95% confidence interval: 3.54 - 15.83). Adverse events as reported in the reviewed trials were mild, transient and infrequent. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: These data imply that kava extract is superior to placebo and relatively safe as a symptomatic treatment for anxiety. These findings warrant further and more rigorous investigations into the efficacy and safety of kava extract.

Anxiety↗