SEARCH · Search PubMed
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Notwithstanding the elimination efforts, leprosy control programs face the problem of many leprosy patients remaining undetected. Leprosy control focuses on early diagnosis through screening of household contacts, although this high-risk group generates only a small proportion of all incident cases. For the remaining incident cases, leprosy control programs have to rely on self-reporting of patients. We explored the extent to which other contact groups contribute to incident leprosy. We examined retrospectively incident leprosy over 25 years in a high-endemic village of 2283 inhabitants in Sulawesi, Indonesia, by systematically reviewing data obtained from the local program and actively gathering data through interviews and a house-to-house survey. We investigated the contact status in the past of every incident case. In addition to household contact, we distinguished neighbor and social contacts. Of the 101 incident cases over a 25-year period, 79 (78%) could be associated to contact with another leprosy patient. Twenty-eight (28%) of these 101 cases were identified as household contacts, 36 (36%) as neighbors, and the remaining 15 (15%) as social contacts. Three patients had not had a traceable previous contact with another leprosy patient, and no information could be gathered from 19 patients. The median span of time from the registration of the primary case to that of the secondary case was 3 years; 95% of the secondary cases were detected within 6 years after the primary case. The estimated risk for leprosy was about nine times higher in households of patients and four times higher in direct neighboring houses of patients compared to households that had had no such contact with patients. The highest risk of leprosy was associated with households of multibacillary patients. The risk of leprosy for households of paucibacillary patients was similar to the risk of leprosy for direct neighboring houses of multibacillary patients, indicating that both the type of leprosy of the primary case and the distance to the primary case are important contributing factors for the risk of leprosy. Contact with a leprosy patient is the major determinant in incident leprosy; the type of contact is not limited to household relationships but also includes neighbor and social relationships. This finding can be translated into a valuable and sustainable tool for leprosy control programs and elimination campaigns by focusing case detection and health promotion activities not only on household contacts but also on at least the neighbors of leprosy cases.
Growing out of the successful transmission of leprosy to armadillos, making available large quantities of M. leprae, there have been remarkable recent advances in the knowledge of the leprosy bacillus. These bacilli and their isolated chemical constituents provide organisms for in vitro testing of new drugs, reagents for the study of the immunologic dysfunction in leprosy patients, development of early diagnostic methods, and the preparation of candidate vaccines. Leprosy is usually transmitted by the nasorespiratory route, but occasionally, there is transplacental infection. There are reports suggesting that patients have acquired leprosy by contact with wild M. leprae-infected armadillos in Louisiana and Texas. Perturbations in lymphocyte-macrophage interaction appear to be most closely related to the defective CMI in leprosy. The helper T/suppressor T cell populations vary markedly in lesions of the various forms of leprosy, with enhanced suppression of T-cell activity in lepromatous disease. Infiltration of IL-2 and gamma-interferon seems to stimulate CMI in situ in lesions of lepromatous leprosy. Vaccination of lepromatous patients with a killed M. leprae-plus-BCG preparation stimulates CMI and clears tissues of leprosy bacilli, providing an immunotherapeutic approach to the management of leprosy. Immunoprophylactic vaccine trials are in progress, and initial results should be available in 1991. Because of drug resistance, dapsone monotherapy of leprosy is no longer recommended. Multidrug regimens, composed of dapsone, rifampin, and clofazimine or a thioamide, are now required and appear to reduce the incidence of leprosy when applied assiduously. Newer experimental drugs that may eventually be included in these regimens include the fluoroquinolones, minocycline, and clarithromycin. There is no clear evidence that the early serologic diagnosis of leprosy is generally applicable. Favorable response to therapy in multibacillary patients, however, may be assessed by noting drops in levels of M. leprae-specific antigens in blood and urine and, to a lesser extent, levels of specific antibodies in serum. There are conflicting reports on the influence of AIDS on leprosy. There are no convincing data showing that AIDS and leprosy affect each other. Although chemotherapy offers the best current hope for the control of leprosy, effective immunoprophylaxis and improved socioeconomic conditions in endemic areas are thought to be essential in programs for the eradication of leprosy.
OBJECTIVES: Determining the occurrence of leprosy amongst couples and establishing the type of leprosy in index and secondary cases. METHODS: The characteristics of leprosy were studied between 1980 and 2000 in Atlántico Department located on the Colombian Caribbean Coast. Clinical histories of patients registered in the Leprosy Control Programme were reviewed. Clinical exams were performed and personal interviews carried out with couples suffering from leprosy. RESULTS: Twenty-six married couples were found to be suffering from leprosy, representing 5.4% of leprosy cases detected during the study period. They were aged from 20 to 89. 65.4% of the index cases were men and 22 (84.6%) were multibacillary, lepromatous cases; two had indeterminate leprosy and two were suffering from tuberculoid leprosy. Sixty-one percent of the secondary cases were paucibacillary patients, 42% of them being tuberculoid. No paucibacillary cases were associated with multibacillary leprosy in the couples. Only two couples had consanguinity. None of the couples had had leprosy at the time of being married. The time between leprosy being detected in index cases and the disease being detected in secondary patients varied from 5 to 40 years. Disabilities were more common in the feet and to a higher degree in lepromatous index cases who had had the disease for a longer time than the secondary cases because these were more frequently paucibacillary patients who had a disease having shorter evolution. CONCLUSIONS: In spite of ongoing, prolonged contact, conjugal leprosy is not frequent and requires several years to develop in the second person. Lepromatous leprosy in index cases was more frequently associated with leprosy in the couple. When the primary case was paucibacillary, no multibacillary leprosy occurred in the secondary case.
Pituitary testicular functions were evaluated in leprosy. Forty-three men with leprosy were studied by basal estimations of plasma LH, FSH, Prolactin, Testosterone, 17-beta estradiol, metoclopramide stimulated prolactin responses and hCG stimulated testosterone responses. Fifteen young healthy men with proven fertility were studied as control subjects. The hormone estimations were related to the histologic changes observed in the testicular biopsies of leprous hypogonadism. In lepromatous leprosy (n:18) the basal plasma gonadotropin levels were significantly increased (FSH 29.5 +/- 2.3 mlU/ml; LH 21.5 +/- 1.9 mlU/ml, mean +/- SE). The plasma gonadotropins were in the normal range in tuberculoid leprosy. In borderline leprosy, the basal mean plasma FSH was normal, whereas LH levels were significantly increased (22.5 +/- 1.2 mlU/ml). The basal plasma testosterone levels were significantly decreased in lepromatous leprosy (1.6 +/- 0.12 ng/ml), tuberculoid leprosy (4.2 +/- 1.7 ng/ml) and borderline leprosy (1.8 +/- 0.18 ng/ml). The basal plasma 17-beta estradiol levels were significantly elevated in all the three types of leprosy. The basal plasma prolactin levels in plasma were significantly increased in lepromatous and tuberculoid leprosy. During hCG stimulation tests, the peak plasma testosterone responses were significantly reduced in both lepromatous leprosy and tuberculoid leprosy subjects. The blunted testosterone responses during hCG stimulation tests in leprosy correlated with the high basal 17-beta estradiol levels (r = 0.58; P less than 0.05). These results strongly suggest that hypogonadism in leprosy results from primary testicular failure. The significant elevation of plasma 17-beta estradiol levels in lepromatous, tuberculoid and borderline leprosy could play a role in hypogonadism of leprosy.
Leprosy is an endemic disease in Guatemala. The author presents a brief account of the Leprosy situation, from the year of 1527 to January first, 1982. During the early years of the Guatemala's colonial epoch, Leprosy was also named "Lazarus illness". From the years of 1530 to 1874, the leprosy patients, were successively attended in the following hospitals: 1) "The Mercy Hospital" in 1530; 2) "The Saint Lazarus Hospital" in 1638; 3) "The Piety Asylum" in 1874; and 4) "The Ramiro Galvez Leprosarium" in 1972. In 1973, was founded the "Guatemala Leprosy Patronage" and also, it created the the INSTITUTE OF DERMATOLOGY, also named INDERMA. From January first of 1973 to January first of 1982, INDERMA taked care and and treated, in its Guatemala city hospital and out patients clinics, the following cases: I. Patients with diseases of the skin, 79,241, II. New leprosy patients plus periodical consults (every 3 months) of old and known leprosy patients, during 9 consecutive years, 3,685, III. Clinical controls and consults of suspicious contacts, 6,188, IV. The INDERMA's rural anti leprosy campaign and their mobil units, take care and clinically examined healthy persons, 12,096, Among this group, were discovered 137 new leprosy patients. The total amount of INDERMA's health services, til I/82, 101,206. The rural anti leprosy campaign, has confirmed that the north oriental zone is the endemic area of Guatemala (Photo 7). Until today (I/1982) there are 410 verified cases of Leprosy in Guatemala. Among them, the predominant leprosy type, is the lepromatous one, with 49,04%. 62,43% of the leprosy patients are male. Of the age group, the 30 to 39 year old, predominates with 19,24%. The prevalence and density leprosy index, were verified only in the endemic zone with 24 257 square kilometers and 0,564% and 1 441 290 population = 0,345%. Actually, as the endemic leprosy area is controlled, INDERMA has continued the study and care of the leprosy patients in the rest of the Guatemala republic.
Since earliest history the person with leprosy has been shut out from society. Laws have prohibited marriage and allowed divorce of those with leprosy. Segregation of the sufferer from the rest of society has been followed by separation of the sexes, and of leprous parents from their children. With the advent of antileprotic drugs, first dapsone then multidrug therapy (MDT), infection can be treated, individuals made non-infectious, and the pool of infection in the community reduced. The clinical signs of leprosy are due not to the degree of infection but to the immunological status of the host. Hormonal changes at puberty and in pregnancy can cause variation of the host's immune status. Pregnancy in women with leprosy is a hazardous undertaking. First appearance of leprosy, reactivation of the disease and relapse in 'cured' patients is likely to occur particularly in the third trimester of pregnancy. Leprosy reactions caused by variation in cell mediated and humoral immunity are triggered off by pregnancy: type 1 reaction (reversal reaction, RR) occurs post partum, while type 2 reaction (erythema nodosum leprosum, ENL) peaks in late pregnancy. Both types of reaction continue long into lactation. Neuritis with loss of both sensory and motor function is associated with relapse and reaction. Relapse, reaction and nerve damage, especially 'silent neuritis', with subsequent deformity and disability, occur not only in women on apparently effective treatment but also in those who have received MDT and have been released from treatment (RFT). To prevent disability, research is urgently needed into the mechanisms of early and late reaction and neuritis. Pregnancy is not only a trigger factor for reaction but an ideal in vivo model for research. Up to 20% of children born to mothers with leprosy may develop leprosy by puberty. While early leprosy in young children is self-healing, when marriage and childbearing take place at an early age the daughters of mothers with leprosy are likely to run the risk of experiencing the adverse effects of pregnancy on leprosy. Increased awareness and health education, as well as long term surveillance of 'cured' leprosy patients, are essential to break a potentially vicious cycle of leprosy and pregnancy. Women with cured leprosy could play an important role in screening for and detection of both early leprosy in children and late, post-MDT RFT, nerve damage in their mothers.
In the year 2002, leprosy situation in Thailand has been steadily progress. However, the prevalence rate and percentage of leprosy patients are still quite high in the North-Eastern part of Thailand. Therefore, we have focused our plan of action 2001-2 on "The strengthening of Leprosy Elimination and Prevention of Disability in the North-Eastern Region." The objective of which is to improve and sustain the ability of leprosy related staff to conduct activities such as case finding, complication diagnosis, treatment of disabilities, rehabilitation, supervision and evaluation. The International Medical Co-operation for Leprosy in 2001, we received funds from Netherland Leprosy Relief Association (NLR) for 9 programmes concerning training of leprosy for health officers and assessment of the quality of life for leprosy affected persons living in northeastern colonies. There are 3 training courses of leprosy for new medical doctors, lab technicians from community and provincial hospitals and 2 workshops on Rehabilitation and Development of Leprosy Affected Persons "Quality of Life" under the Germany Leprosy Relief Association (GLRA) support. From Japan we received funding from Sasakawa Memorial Health Foundation (SMHF) for 4 projects in immunological studies since 1997 and 2 projects concerning dental services for Leprosy patients in the north and northeast regions from Umemoto Memorial Dental Service Group (UMDSG). The medical co-operation between Japan and Thailand should increase in many aspects especially, for new chemotherapy, immunotherapy and vaccine study in Leprosy. The future vision of Leprosy, we plan to set up the International Center of Leprosy for medical officers, technicians, etc. for the South-East Asian Countries. You are welcome to join and work together with us.
SETTING: An epidemiological study of the interaction of leprosy and HIV infection in Tanzania. OBJECTIVE: To establish the prevalence of HIV infection among leprosy patients, and to measure the association of HIV and leprosy by comparing the HIV prevalence in leprosy patients and blood donors. DESIGN: Testing for HIV infection in consecutively diagnosed leprosy patients (new and relapsed after MDT) in all regions in Tanzania successively for a period of 3 to 6 months during 1991, 1992 and 1993. RESULTS: Out of the total estimated eligible leprosy patients, 697 patients (69%) entered the final analysis. The HIV prevalence among these leprosy patients was 12% (83/697) as compared to 6% (8960/ 158,971) in blood donors examined in Tanzania during the same period. There were no significant differences in HIV seroprevalence by age, sex, residence or type of disease. However, the adjusted odds ratio (OR) of the presence of a BCG scar was 1.9 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-3.3] among HIV-positive leprosy cases compared to HIV-negative leprosy cases. Comparing leprosy cases with blood donors as controls, the logistic regression model, controlling for sex, age group and residence, showed the OR for HIV seropositivity among leprosy patients to be 2.5 (95% CI 2.0-3.2). This association existed in all strata, but was strongest in the 15-34-year age group. No difference of HIV status between multibacillary and paucibacillary leprosy could be shown to exist. The point estimate of the population attributable risk of HIV infection for leprosy was 7%. CONCLUSION: HIV infection is associated with leprosy and might reverse the epidemiological trend of the slow decline in case notification in Tanzania if HIV infection is increasing greatly. Previous BCG vaccination loses its protection against leprosy in the presence of HIV infection. A repeated study is recommended in order to validate these findings, whereby recording of the disability grading of the cases is necessary to adjust for delay in diagnosis.
OBJECTIVES: Los Angeles County-University of Southern California Medical Center, like many large urban hospitals, has a large immigrant population from regions of the world where leprosy is endemic. Emergency physicians (EPs) in these settings can expect to encounter leprosy patients. This study reviewed the emergency department (ED) course of patients with confirmed leprosy in an attempt to describe the most common presenting patterns so that future cases can be more easily recognized. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of all patients followed in the Hansen's disease clinic. Demographics, leprosy type, clinical presentations to the ED, and medications were recorded. RESULTS: Of the total number of patients (415), most were of Mexican (52%), Filipino (15%), Vietnamese (14%), and Chinese (5%) origin. Leprosy was classified as lepromatous (56%), borderline (40%), and tuberculoid (4%). There were a total of 118 ED visits by 74 patients. The mean age was 46 years, with 51% male and 49% female. Dermatologic (68%), neurologic (23%), and ophthalmologic (9%) complaints were the most common reasons for ED presentation related to leprosy. The EP did not elicit a history of leprosy in 34% of those patients followed in the leprosy clinic. The ED diagnosis of leprosy was made in 3 of 15 (20%) undiagnosed cases. Of the 63 patients prescribed medications in the leprosy clinic at the time of their ED visits, 22 (35%) ED charts did not report leprosy drugs. CONCLUSION: Patients with leprosy present to U.S. EDs, and new cases can be identified. Early recognition is important given leprosy's devastating consequences, major drug side effects of medications used for treatment, and improved prognosis with multidrug therapy. A history of leprosy and associated medications are often not documented in the ED chart, which may reflect a continued fear of stigmatization among these patients.
BACKGROUND: It is generally accepted that genetic factors play a role in susceptibility to both leprosy per se and leprosy type, but only few studies have tempted to quantify this. Estimating the contribution of genetic factors to clustering of leprosy within families is difficult since these persons often share the same environment. The first aim of this study was to test which correlation structure (genetic, household or spatial) gives the best explanation for the distribution of leprosy patients and seropositive persons and second to quantify the role of genetic factors in the occurrence of leprosy and seropositivity. METHODS: The three correlation structures were proposed for population data (n = 560), collected on a geographically isolated island highly endemic for leprosy, to explain the distribution of leprosy per se, leprosy type and persons harbouring Mycobacterium leprae-specific antibodies. Heritability estimates and risk ratios for siblings were calculated to quantify the genetic effect. Leprosy was clinically diagnosed and specific anti-M. leprae antibodies were measured using ELISA. RESULTS: For leprosy per se in the total population the genetic correlation structure fitted best. In the population with relative stable household status (persons under 21 years and above 39 years) all structures were significant. For multibacillary leprosy (MB) genetic factors seemed more important than for paucibacillary leprosy. Seropositivity could be explained best by the spatial model, but the genetic model was also significant. Heritability was 57% for leprosy per se and 31% for seropositivity. CONCLUSION: Genetic factors seem to play an important role in the clustering of patients with a more advanced form of leprosy, and they could explain more than half of the total phenotypic variance.
OBJECTIVE: To study the profile of leprosy cases at Nkhotakota District Hospital in Central Region of Malawi. DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional study of all registered cases of leprosy from records over a nine year period (January 1992 to April 2001) SETTING: Nkhotakota District Hospital-Central Region of Malawi. RESULTS: In total 526 cases of leprosy were identified from the records. The prevalence rates gradually increased from 0.998 per 10,000 cases in 1992 to 3.39 cases per 10,000 in 1995. There was however a gradual decline of prevalence rates from 1997/1998 that had 3.17 cases per 10,000 to 1.3 cases per 10,000 in 2001. 1996 registered 2.34 cases per 10,000. Fifty seven cases (10.8%) were found with children of the age of 14 or below and 469 (89.2%) cases were of adults. Paucibacillary leprosy presented with more cases than multibacillary leprosy (p < 0.0000001). There were 80 (15.2%) cases of multibacillary leprosy compared to 446 (84.8%) cases of paucibacillary leprosy. In addition more males were affected by multibacillary leprosy than females (p < 0.0001) and females were more affected by paucibacillary leprosy (p < 0.01) than males. CONCLUSION: The results show that paucibacillary leprosy though minor in Malawi can become endemic as paucibacillary leprosy is a reflection of leprosy contacts in the population. We therefore recommend continued epidemiological surveys of leprosy. Training in leprosy detection should be encouraged so that this disease can be totally eradicated in Malawi.
Even today, leprosy is a relatively frequently occurring disease, especially in tropical regions of the world. From the eleventh to thirteenth century, leprosy pandemics affected Europe, including Croatia. Probably as a consequence of such history, one can still find endemic foci of leprosy in present-day Croatia. The aim of this study was to analyse all cases of leprosy registered in Croatia during the twentieth century; therefore, we studied thoroughly existing medical documentation and published reports on sporadic leprosy cases, and went on to collect the relevant data through on-site investigation in those parts of Croatia known as putative endemic foci of leprosy. In this way, we collected data concerning the number of leprosy cases, the probable sources of infection, and traced the possible paths of spread of the disease. During the twentieth century, 17 cases of leprosy were registered in Croatia. However, due to the loss of medical documentation concerning the cases from Metković, the total number was obviously slightly greater. Concerning the 17 analysed cases, 4 patients were most probably infected during their visits (as sailors or immigrant workers) to the Middle East, South America or Africa; 3 patients developed leprosy after prolonged close contact with previously infected family members, while the exact source of infection remains unsettled for the remaining 10. However, 2 of these patients originated from the area of Cazin in Bosnia and Herzegovina, which is known to be an endemic focus of leprosy. Furthermore, the remaining 8 came from the small area of the village of Blizna in the Croatian municipality of Trogir, and therefore it seems reasonable to conclude that Blizna represents the endemic focus of leprosy in Croatia. The last case of leprosy in Blizna was registered back in 1956. Nevertheless, it is clear that sporadic cases of leprosy can reappear in Croatia, originating either from this endemic focus of Blizna, or as an infected person returning to Croatia from abroad. So, we can conclude that, even today, Croatian medical doctors (and especially dermatovenereologists) should still be acquainted with the clinical diagnosis of leprosy and basic principles of its treatment.
The contribution of leprosy research to the progress being made toward elimination of leprosy has been critical. A major development in the promotion of leprosy research during the last 25 years has been the initiative taken by the WHO Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR) through two of its scientific working groups, one on the immunology of leprosy (IMMLEP) and the other on the chemotherapy of leprosy (THELEP), which were set up in 1974 and 1976, respectively. IMMLEP and THELEP have greatly facilitated inputs from scientists not usually active in leprosy research. The coordinated efforts of IMMLEP and THELEP also facilitated goal-oriented research toward high-priority target areas such as an anti-leprosy vaccine and newer and better drug-combinations for the treatment of leprosy. Whereas the prospects for a leprosy vaccine appeared very promising in the early years, the first vaccine produced did not meet expectations for several reasons. Moreover, the possibility of using a vaccine in leprosy is not bright, because of both the technical problems as well as the reduced relevance of a vaccine at a time when leprosy is becoming less and less common. On the other hand, the modest expectations for newer and better drug combinations led to multi-drug therapy (MDT) for the control of leprosy. It is the introduction of MDT that is credited with the current global reduction of leprosy and the progress thus far made toward eliminating the disease as a public health problem. Nevertheless, many areas in leprosy, such as nerve damage, remain that require major research inputs in the future.
Whether or not the leprosy elimination target is met in all endemic countries by the year 2000, the MDT programme will have greatly reduced worldwide prevalence. However, our workshop chairmen were asked to ignore the prevalence-based leprosy 'elimination' programme and focus on recommendations for a long term, incidence-based eradication target where transmission is blocked. They were asked to be concerned with basic leprosy research goals in the post 2000 era. The members of our workshops are actively productive workers, committed to their special interests. They are fully cognizant of the obstacles faced daily in working with leprosy and M. leprae, the requirement for clever experimental design even with the availability of the powerful tools of molecular biology which can now be brought to bear on some of the research obstacles. They are also aware of our lack of understanding about leprosy and M. leprae. How do you block transmission if you don't know how infection is transmitted? Can infection be detected, diagnosis made earlier? Is there a non-human reservoir host, a carrier state, an environmental source? What is the basis of M. leprae's predilection for nerves, the mechanisms underlying reactions? What needs to be targeted to treat reactions? Can a vaccine play a role? There is nothing startling in the workshops' recommendations. Other individuals and groups of experts have made the same suggestions, with slightly varying priorities. What one can read between the lines of these reports, is a sense of urgency to get as much done as soon as possible. Worldwide interest in leprosy will soon be diminished, not by design but as a consequence of the laudable success of the MDT programme. The experiment is still underway, but chemotherapy alone, killing bacilli in the detectable human host, does not appear to be the answer to blocking transmission. A number of goals must be addressed while there are still intact national and international leprosy programmes, while there are still leprosy treatment and research centres that can co-ordinate and facilitate the necessary trials for early diagnosis, early detection of reactions, evaluation of immunosuppressive regimens for reactions. A key recommendation is concerned with the means of measuring progress. A clear and explicit means of reporting incidence, prevalence and 'case detection' should be implemented to avoid a distorted picture of worldwide leprosy. These recommendations are non-controversial. What should be done is clear. The uncertainty is in determining who will do the work. Who will fund the laboratories engaged in this work? Look around you. There are fewer scientists attending this Congress but browsing the abstracts and attending our sessions and posters clearly revealed to me that fewer of us are doing far better work than in the past. Alternative sources of funding will help. Tuberculosis research is enticing researchers away from leprosy in the developed countries but is visibly sustaining leprosy research in many centres in developing countries. Formation of alliances was a key goal of this Congress. I asked my colleagues from Carville to identify in their own discipline, dedicated people, committed laboratories that will sustain their leprosy research efforts over the next 5, 10 or more years. These are the people with whom we wish to collaborate, form alliances, share resources and expertise, address the future of worldwide leprosy.