[The risk of chronicity in acute viral hepatitis. A study of 1614 convalescents followed for a year after hospitalization].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · Search PubMed
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: To compare intraoperative and postoperative outcomes between laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy among patients who are not eligible for vaginal hysterectomy. METHODS: Study subjects were randomly assigned to undergo laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy or standard abdominal hysterectomy. Intraoperative and postoperative management was similar for each group. Surgical characteristics, complications, length of hospital stay, charges, and convalescence were analyzed. RESULTS: Sixty-five women at three institutions underwent laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (n = 34) or abdominal hysterectomy (n = 31). Three patients in the laparoscopic group required conversion to abdominal hysterectomy. Mean operating time was significantly longer for laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (179.8 versus 146.0 minutes). There were no differences in blood loss or incidence of intraoperative complications. There was a higher incidence of wound complications in the abdominal hysterectomy group, but no significant difference in the frequency of postoperative complications. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy required a significantly shorter mean hospital stay (2.1 days) and convalescence (28.0 days) than abdominal hysterectomy (4.1 days and 38.0 days, respectively). There were no significant differences in mean hospital charges between the study groups (laparoscopic $8161, abdominal $6974). CONCLUSION: Except for operating time, there are no differences between laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy regarding intraoperative characteristics among abdominal hysterectomy candidates. Postoperatively, laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy requires a shorter hospital stay and convalescence. Hospital charges are similar between the procedures. A larger number of cases will help determine the indications for laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy.
The high number of xenotransplantations that have been carried out around the world since the beginning of the century, combined with the quantity of animal experiments that have exposed man to animal viruses under similar conditions, should be measured against the low incidence of known pathological consequences. The pathogenic potential of animal viruses for man, then, is unpredictable; and while the risk is acknowledged, it cannot be defined. Unless no benefit can be in xenotransplantation, the application of the precautionary principle to the extent of a moratorium seems to be excessive. The precautionary principle offers possible modes of action in the face of an unquantifiable risk. In the event of xenotransplantation, precautionary measures should be taken in advance, in order to limit risk to the maximum extent. The risk is reduced and the benefit/risk ratio becomes higher, rendering the challenge acceptable. Preventive measures should be taken as the knowledge grows about possible modes of transmission. Guidelines of good practice should be implemented at each step of the xenotransplantation process: birth of animal source by hysterotomy in a 'Specific Pathogen-Free' (SPF) centre rearing in incubator then in isolated conditions (SPF centre) transportation to and rearing in the procurement site (SPF hospital special wing) surgical procurement and xenotransplantation (hospital) post-surgical reanimation (intensive care unit) convalescence (isolated room--hospital) long-term recipient follow-up (home) All these steps should be taken in such a way as to limit the number of persons coming into contact with the recipient.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
After the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the postacute effects of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection have gradually attracted attention. To precisely evaluate the health status of convalescent patients with COVID-19, we analyzed symptom and proteome data of 442 plasma samples from healthy controls, hospitalized patients, and convalescent patients 6 or 12 months after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Symptoms analysis revealed distinct relationships in convalescent patients. Results of plasma protein expression levels showed that C1QA, C1QB, C2, CFH, CFHR1, and F10, which regulate the complement system and coagulation, remained highly expressed even at the 12-month follow-up compared with their levels in healthy individuals. By combining symptom and proteome data, 442 plasma samples were categorized into three subtypes: S1 (metabolism-healthy), S2 (COVID-19 retention), and S3 (long COVID). We speculated that convalescent patients reporting hair loss could have a better health status than those experiencing headaches and dyspnea. Compared to other convalescent patients, those reporting sleep disorders, appetite decrease, and muscle weakness may need more attention because they were classified into the S2 subtype, which had the most samples from hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Subtyping convalescent patients with COVID-19 may enable personalized treatments tailored to individual needs. This study provides valuable plasma proteomic datasets for further studies associated with long COVID.
Multi-modal rehabilitation with an emphasis on preoperative information, reduction of surgical stress responses, optimized dynamic pain relief with continuous epidural analgesia and early mobilization and oral nutrition may reduce hospital stay, morbidity, convalescence, and costs (fast-track surgery). Current results from fast-track colonic surgery suggest that postoperative pulmonary, cardiovascular, and muscle function are improved and body composition preserved as well as a normal oral intake of energy and protein can be achieved. Consequently, hospital stay is reduced to about 2-4 days, with decreased fatigue and need for sleep in the convalescence period. Despite a higher risk for readmissions, overall costs and morbidity seem to be reduced. Existing data from several institutions support the concept of fast-track colonic surgery to improve postoperative organ functions, thereby allowing for early rehabilitation with decreased hospital stay, convalescence, and costs. Further data are needed from multi-national institutions on morbidity, safety, and costs.
It is suggested that laparoscopic surgery reduces postoperative pain and shortens hospital stay and convalescence because of the small amount of tissue trauma. We evaluated the inflammatory response during abdominal hysterectomy (AH, 12 women) and laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH, 12 women) by measuring interleukin (IL)-6, neopterin and terminal C5b9 complement complex (TCC). Blood samples were drawn preoperatively, perioperatively, 1 minute, 24 hours, and 7 days postoperatively. Levels of IL-6 were determined to evaluate cytokine release, neopterin was determined as a marker for macrophage-monocyte activation, and TCC was determined to assess complement activation. The IL-6 concentrations, as a percentage of preoperative level, were significantly elevated postoperatively in both groups, and also perioperatively in the LH group. Neopterin concentrations, as a percentage of perioperative level, were significantly increased in the LH group preoperatively and postoperatively. No elevation was seen in the AH group. There was no sign of complement activation in either group. Our results indicate significant tissue trauma during both LH and AH. The extent of trauma might be greater in laparoscopic surgery. Despite this, the LH group had a shorter hospital stay and convalescence than the AH group. The proposed advantages to the patient of laparsocopic surgery thus seem to be attributable to other factors than the amount of tissue trauma.
Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) is caused by a novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV). In a longitudinal cross-sectional study, we determined the prevalence of virus in bodily excretions and time of seroconversion in discharged patients with SARS. Conjunctival, throat, stool, and urine specimens were collected weekly from 64 patients and tested for SARS-CoV RNA by real-time polymerase chain reaction; serum samples were collected weekly and tested for SARS-CoV antibody with indirect enzyme immunoassay and immunofluorescence assay. In total, 126 conjunctival, 124 throat swab, 116 stool, and 124 urine specimens were analyzed. Five patients had positive stool samples, collected in weeks 5-9. Two patients seroconverted in weeks 7 and 8; the others were seropositive at the first serum sample collection. In this study, 5 (7.8%) of 64 patients continued to shed viral RNA in stool samples only, for up to week 8 of illness. Most seroconversions occurred by week 6 of illness.
Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is often characterized by end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and problems including pain, hematuria, and infection. Open nephrectomy is curative; however, the morbidity of the procedure is considerable. Between 1995 and 1998, 11 laparoscopic nephrectomies were performed on nine symptomatic patients (five men and four women) with ESRD and ADPKD. Two patients underwent a staged bilateral laparoscopic nephrectomy. All patients presented with abdominal or flank pain and an abdominal mass. Other clinical problems included hypertension in eight patients, urinary tract infections in two patients, and gross hematuria in one patient. Seven patients were receiving long-term dialysis treatment, and two patients had undergone prior renal transplantation. Patients were evaluated for preoperative and postoperative pain, analgesic use, hospital course, and convalescence. The overall average operative time was 6.3 hours, with an average estimated blood loss of 153 mL. Eight nephrectomy specimens were removed by morcellation, and three specimens were removed intact through a 7- to 12-cm incision. The average hospital stay was 3 days, and the average time to normal activity was 5 weeks. With a mean follow-up of 31 months, all nine patients reported elimination of their preoperative pain based on a pain analogue score. Six major and two minor complications occurred, including blood transfusion, a vena cavotomy, splenic cyanosis, pulmonary embolism, clotted arteriovenous fistula, and brachial plexus injury. Incisional hernias occurred in two of the three patients who underwent open removal. One patient noted improvement, and two patients noted resolution of their hypertension postoperatively. Laparoscopic nephrectomy in patients with ADPKD and ESRD offers an effective alternative to open nephrectomy to manage renal-related pain. This procedure provides the benefits of minimal intraoperative blood loss, minimal postoperative pain, brief hospital stay, and rapid convalescence.
We analyzed hospital and physician charges for 99 consecutive patients who underwent implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation at our institution. Eighteen patients received an epicardial lead system and 81 were scheduled to receive a nonthoracotomy lead system, the generator being implanted either abdominally (n = 62) or pectorally (n = 19). The epicardial group had a significantly longer convalescent stay (11.6 +/- 2.5 days; mean +/- SEM) than the abdominal nonthoracotomy group, analyzed by intention to treat (4.6 +/- 0.5 days) or by treatment received (3.8 +/- 0.2 days; p <0.0001). Postoperative stay for the pectoral group was shorter still (2.9 +/- 0.4 days; p <0.033). Total charges for the epicardial group were $99,081 +/- $25,094, significantly higher than those for any of the nonthoracotomy groups (p <0.017). Total charges for the pectoral group were $44,128 +/- $2,465, significantly less than those for the abdominal nonthoracotomy group, analyzed by intention to treat ($59,961 +/- $1,369; p <0.05) or by treatment received ($56,679 +/- $635; p <0.05). Cost reductions in the nonthoracotomy groups were primarily due to decreased in-hospital convalescence period, lower surgeon and anesthesiologist fees, and lower procedure-day hospital charges in the pectoral group. The use of ICDs with nonthoracotomy leads can result in significantly shorter in-hospital convalescence and a reduction in total implant-related charges of 40% to 55%. The use of pectorally implanted ICDs results in further reduction in hospital stay and further cost reduction of 22% to 26%. The trend toward shorter convalescent stay without postimplant testing is likely to reduce further the overall costs of ICD implantation.
PURPOSE: The efficacy and morbidity of laparoscopic renal and adrenal surgery in comparison to open surgery in obese patients are unknown. This retrospective study was performed to compare the outcome of laparoscopic versus open renal and adrenal surgery in the markedly and morbidly obese patient (body mass index 30 or greater). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study group comprised all obese patients undergoing laparoscopic renal and adrenal surgery (laparoscopic group) from August 1997 to February 1998 at our institution. The majority of procedures were performed using a retroperitoneoscopic approach via the flank. These patients were compared with all obese patients undergoing open renal and adrenal surgery (open group) from 1994 to 1998. Open group patients with factors precluding laparoscopic surgery were excluded from the study (mass greater than 10 cm., renal vein and/or inferior vena caval thrombus and extension outside Gerota's fascia). RESULTS: There were 21 obese patients in each group and baseline parameters were comparable between groups. Median body mass index in the laparoscopic and open groups was 34 and 31, respectively. Median surgical time between the laparoscopic (210 minutes) and open (185) groups was comparable (p = 0.16). However, the laparoscopic group had decreased blood loss (100 versus 350 ml., p<0.001), quicker resumption of oral intake and ambulation (less than 1 versus 5 days, p<0.001), decreased narcotic analgesic requirements (12 versus 279 mg., p<0.001), shorter median hospital stay (less than 1 versus 5 days, p<0.001) and quicker convalescence (3 versus 9 weeks, p<0.001). There were 6 complications in 4 laparoscopic cases and 14 in 9 open surgery cases (p = 0.16). CONCLUSIONS: Markedly obese patients have an increased risk of complications from surgery, regardless of the approach. Our data suggest that laparoscopic renal and adrenal surgery is technically feasible in the markedly and morbidly obese patient, and compared with open surgery results in significantly decreased blood loss, quicker return of bowel function, less analgesic requirement, shorter convalescence and reduced hospital stay.
Systematic development of laparoscopy during the last decade has led to establishing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) as a surgical procedure. On the basis of extensive experience at our center, the advantages of the minimally invasive method are described as well as the problems still in existence. Reduced trauma caused by laparoscopic access in combination with clearly reduced blood loss has resulted in less morbidity after laparoscopic procedures. This is reflected in a shorter postoperative stay in hospital and faster convalescence. LRP as an ambitious and complex procedure has an average complication rate of 12%, which shows that the method has surpassed the stage of experimental surgery. By direct comparison, the costs of LRP are higher than for the open surgical procedure, but on the whole this is economically balanced by the lower morbidity, shorter hospital stay, and faster convalescence. The progress in technology to be expected in the field of laparoscopy will further increase quality, precision, and safety of LRP and thus contribute to the establishment of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy as a surgical method of choice.
The diagnosis of breast cancer creates emotional distress for patients as well as family members. This article reviews studies on the psychological adjustment of women and their family members during the diagnosis, hospitalization, and early convalescence from breast surgery. Studies indicate that the diagnostic phase is an extremely stressful time for women, marked by high anxiety, uncertainty, and difficulty making decisions. The hospital phase is especially difficult for spouses, who must juggle work responsibilities with added home responsibilities and also spend time at the hospital supporting their wives. In the convalescent phase, patients and family members need to adjust to changes in family roles, cope with fears about recurrence, and learn to balance the needs of all family members. In order to provide high quality health care to breast cancer patients and their family members, physicians and nurses need to address the emotional as well as the physical aspects of recovery.
PURPOSE: Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy has emerged as a standard of care in appropriate candidates with clinical stage T1 renal tumors (7 cm or less). Herein we present our experience with laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for clinical stage T2 tumors (greater than 7 cm). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing laparoscopic radical nephrectomy between September 1997 and July 2003 were retrospectively subdivided into group LAPT1-166 with tumor size 7 cm and group LAPT2-65 with tumor size greater than 7 cm. Also, group LAPT2 was compared with a group of 34 contemporary, comparable patients undergoing open radical nephrectomy for tumor greater than 7 cm (group OPENT2). RESULTS: Compared with group LAPT1, group LAPT2 had younger patients, larger tumors and greater blood loss (100 vs 200 ml) (each p <0.001). Importantly operative time, analgesic requirements, hospital stay, and convalescence and complication rates were comparable. Group LAPT2 and group OPENT2 patients had similar sized tumors (9.2 and 9.9 cm, respectively) but shorter operative time (p = 0.03), lesser blood loss (p <0.001), shorter hospital stay (p <0.001) and more rapid convalescence (p = 0.02) occurred in LAPT2. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for stage T2 renal masses (greater than 7 cm) is feasible and efficacious. Laparoscopic nephrectomy offers the advantages of decreased blood loss, shorter hospital stay and more rapid recovery over open radical nephrectomy for comparable tumors greater than 7 cm. Although surgical outcomes are comparable with laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for smaller tumors (7 cm or less), adequate laparoscopic experience is necessary before performing radical nephrectomy for large T2 tumors.
Major joint surgery (elective hip or knee replacement, or hip fracture) carries a high risk of postoperative deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism. DVT prophylaxis has become an essential part of routine management, since several preventive methods, including low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) and oral anticoagulants, are effective and safe in major joint surgery. Clinically important questions remain about the best way to use LMWHs for DVT prevention. The need for preoperative dosing, whether to give LMWHs once or twice daily, and the most suitable duration of prophylaxis remain issues of debate. Reports of local bleeding after spinal or epidural anaesthesia/analgesia in orthopaedic surgery patients given LMWH may make anaesthetists more reluctant to combine regional anaesthesia with LMWH prophylaxis, especially if a preoperative dose is required. The worldwide trend towards early transfer of postoperative patients from hospital to a convalescent facility or home has increased the need for formal recommendations about the optimal duration of prophylaxis. Ever shorter hospital admissions after elective surgery mean that prophylaxis given only in hospital may not be sufficient.
BACKGROUND: Postoperative organ dysfunction contributes to morbidity, hospital stay and convalescence. Multimodal rehabilitation with epidural analgesia, early oral feeding, mobilization and laxative use after colonic resection has reduced ileus and hospital stay. METHODS: Fourteen patients receiving conventional care (group 1) and 14 patients who had multimodal rehabilitation (group 2) were studied before and 8 days after colonic resection. Outcome measures included postoperative mobilization, body composition by whole-body dual X-ray absorptiometry, cardiovascular response to treadmill exercise, pulmonary function and nocturnal oxygen saturation. RESULTS: Defaecation occurred earlier (median day 1 versus day 4) and hospital stay was shorter (median 2 versus 12 days) in patients who had multimodal treatment. Lean body and fat mass decreased in group 1 but not in group 2. Exercise performance decreased by 44 per cent in group 1 but was unchanged in group 2. A postoperative increase in heart rate (HR) response to exercise was avoided in group 2. Pulmonary function decreased in group 1 but not in group 2. There was less nocturnal postoperative hypoxaemia in group 2. Cardiac demand-supply (HR/oxygen saturation ratio) increased in group 1 but not in group 2. CONCLUSION: Multimodal rehabilitation prevents reduction in lean body mass, pulmonary function, oxygenation and cardiovascular response to exercise after colonic surgery.