Inverted upper gastrointestinal endoscope in the esophagus: technique of endoscopic straightening with an auxiliary instrument.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · Search PubMed
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Esophageal variceal ligation and esophageal variceal sclerotherapy are two modes of therapy commonly used in the treatment of esophageal varices. The purpose of this study was to compare the local complications of these procedures, with special emphasis on production and healing of ulcerations. Twenty-three patients entered the study. Ten patients were randomized to esophageal variceal ligation and 13 to esophageal variceal sclerotherapy. Esophageal variceal ligation produced shallow (0.6 +/- 0.07 mm) circular ulcerations with a large surface area (85.4 +/- 20.3 mm2) that resolved in 14.4 +/- 1.4 days. Esophageal variceal sclerotherapy produced linear, deep ulcerations (1.8 +/- 0.01 mm) with a smaller surface area (13.3 +/- 2.8 mm2) and resolution in 20.9 +/- 1.3 days. These differences were statistically significant by independent t test (p < 0.0001). Esophageal variceal ligation patients required 3.6 +/- 0.4 sessions to achieve obliteration, whereas esophageal variceal sclerotherapy patients required 6.2 +/- 0.5 sessions (independent t test, p < 0.0001). No significant difference was noted between the two groups with regard to death or stricture formation.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
EUS is the most accurate tool for local staging of rectal carcinoma. In addition to providing accurate T- and N-stages, EUS allows assessment of the internal and external anal sphincters. Accurate endosonographic staging directs the optimal method of management of rectal carcinoma, type of resection, and candidacy for neoadjuvant therapy. EMR may be applied to large rectal adenomas as an alternative to surgical resection in selected patients. EUS is important in discriminating lesions suitable for EMR.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.