Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Digoxin”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 469 records · Page 26Linked to original sources

Tritiated digoxin: studies in renal disease in human subjects.

Digoxin is excreted primarily in the urine as the unchanged glycoside: 60-80% can be recovered from the urine in 7 days after a single intravenous dose in the human subject. Definition of the role of the kidney in digoxin excretion, turnover and metabolism was studied in 57 patients with renal disease, transplant candidates and/or donors and recipients of renal transplants. A single dose of 3H digoxin was given to the subjects, frequent serum samples were obtained and all urine and stools were saved for 7 days. All specimens were extracted with chloroform and digoxin, and its metabolites were separated by column chromatography. Results reveal that the serum T1/2 and the dominant T1/2 of digoxin are prolonged in renal disease in direct proportion to the reduction in creatinine clearance (r = 0.833). The blood urea nitrogen (BUN) is also related to digoxin clearance (r = 0.742). The higher the BUN, the less digoxin excreted in the urine. Anephric patients excrete more digoxin in stool, but this does not compensate for the lack of renal excretion. Transplanted kidneys excrete digoxin in proportion to renal functional capacity, as do patients who have experienced unilateral nephrectomy. Peritoneal or hemodialysis is not effective in removing digoxin from the human subject and may lead to digitalis intoxication if K+ is allowed to fall to critical levels. Digoxin excretion is not volume related, as patients with nephritogenic diabetes insipidus excrete the drug normally with urine volumes of 12 liters a day. Digoxin doses in renal insufficiency should be dictated by knowledge of renal functional ability of the kidneys and after "normal" loading doses, and maintenance doses should be 1/4 to 1/2 those usually administered.

Adult↗

Digoxin prescribing for heart failure in elderly residents of long-term care facilities.

BACKGROUND: Digoxin is often used in long-term care (LTC) residents with heart failure despite a high risk of toxicity associated with increased age, comorbidities and polypharmacy. This toxicity may occur at serum digoxin concentrations that are as low as 1.54 nmol/L. OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of digoxin use, estimate the proportion at risk of toxicity and identify correlates of digoxin use in LTC residents with heart failure. METHODS: Cross-sectional survey in eight LTC facilities that lodge a total of 1223 residents. RESULTS: The prevalence of heart failure was 20%. Digoxin was prescribed for 32% of residents with heart failure and was associated with arrhythmia (primarily atrial fibrillation), anticoagulant and diuretic use, and higher serum thyroid-stimulating hormone. Digoxin doses higher than those that achieve the recommended therapeutic peak body stores of 6 microg/kg and 10 microg/kg were prescribed to 80% and 33% of residents with heart failure, respectively. Serum digoxin concentrations were greater than 1.5 nmol/L in 30% of patients. Comorbidities and concurrently prescribed medications that increase the risk of digoxin toxicity were prescribed to 26% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately one-third of LTC residents with heart failure received digoxin. Atrial fibrillation was the most important determinant of use. At least 26% of these residents were exposed to an increased risk of digoxin toxicity. Studies are required to determine safe and effective digoxin dosing regimens for frail elderly heart failure patients. Clinicians should exercise caution when using digoxin in LTC residents.

Aged↗

Endogenous digoxin-like immunoreactivity in elderly patients with normal serum creatinine concentrations.

The effect of digoxin-like immunoreactive substance (DLIS) on serum digoxin determinations in elderly patients with normal serum creatinine concentrations was studied. Patients in the study group were over 70 years of age; the control population was under 55 years of age. All patients had serum creatinine concentrations of less than or equal to 1.5 mg/dL. Apparent digoxin content of serum samples from patients receiving digoxin and from patients in each age group who were not receiving digoxin was determined in duplicate by each of two radioimmunoassays: RIANEN (New England Nuclear), which detects DLIS, and Immophase (Corning Medical and Scientific), which is far less cross-reactive with DLIS. Results from the patients under 55 years of age were analyzed for inherent bias between the assay methods. In patients over 70 years of age, concentrations of DLIS (differences between serum digoxin concentrations measured by RIANEN and Immophase) were compared with creatinine clearance values. No DLIS was detected in sera of patients who had not received digoxin. For patients who received digoxin, nearly all apparent digoxin concentrations were within the usual therapeutic range. For patients without liver or renal failure who received digoxin, no significant difference in digoxin concentrations was observed between the RIANEN and Immophase assays in either the young (n = 17) or elderly (n = 26) patients. There was no significant increase in the difference between the RIANEN and Immophase results with decreasing creatinine clearance. In the elderly patients with normal serum creatinine concentrations, there was no evidence that measurement of serum digoxin concentration using the RIANEN and Immophase assays was compromised by DLIS.

Adult↗

Digoxin -- quinidine interaction.

A patient with chronic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, receiving maintenance doses of digoxin, was admitted for addition of quinidine therapy. With stable serum digoxin levels, the institution of oral quinidine sulfate resulted in a rise in the serum digoxin level in less than 24 hours. The serum digoxin concentration increased more than threefold before digoxin was discontinued. The rise and fall of the digoxin serum concentration appeared to correlate directly with an increase and decrease in the PR interval. With the reinstitution of digoxin at lower doses, apparently stable therapeutic levels of both digoxin and quinidine were achieved. However, discontinuation of quinidine alone was followed by a prompt fall in the serum digoxin level. This study demonstrates that quinidine produces a significant increase in the serum digoxin level. The increased digoxin concentration appears to correlate with enhanced electrophysiologic effects of digoxin and emphasizes the caution required when these two drugs are used simultaneously.

Atrial Fibrillation↗

Digoxin-verapamil interaction: in vitro studies in rat tissue.

Recent studies have shown a significant increase in plasma digoxin concentration during verapamil treatment. This phenomenon has been attributed in part to reduced renal clearance of digoxin owing to inhibition of the digoxin tubular secretory process. We studied the influence of digoxin-verapamil interaction on [125I]digoxin uptake by various rat tissues in vitro, employing the tissue slice technique. Slice/medium digoxin ratios (mean +/- SD) were: kidney, 4.09 +/- 0.60; heart, 3.63 +/- 0.41; liver, 3.93 +/- 0.39; and muscle, 3.55 +/- 0.55. Addition of verapamil to the incubation medium resulted in a 15.6% reduction of digoxin uptake by kidney tissue, to 3.38 +/- 0.49 (p less than 0.0005). Verapamil failed to reduce digoxin uptake in liver, heart, or striated muscle. We conclude that the renal cortical transport mechanism of digoxin may be inhibited by verapamil. In contrast, the unaffected uptake of digoxin in heart or muscle indicates that the increase in serum digoxin concentration in the presence of verapamil is not caused or accompanied by redistribution of digoxin from the heart or striated muscle.

Animals↗

Reversal of lethal digoxin toxicity in guinea pigs using monoclonal antibodies and Fab fragments.

To extend the potential application of digoxin-specific immunoglobulin (Ig) (Fab) fragments for the reversal of advanced digitalis intoxication, monoclonal digoxin-specific antibodies were obtained by fusion of myeloma cell lines with spleen cells from mice immunized with a digoxin-serum albumin conjugate. The monoclonal antibody from the cell line designated Dig 26-10 had high affinity (KA = 5 X 10(9) M-1) and specificity for digoxin and was tested for its efficacy in the reversal of advanced, otherwise lethal digoxin toxicity in guinea pigs given a loading dose of 500 micrograms of digoxin per kg b.wt. i.v. followed by continuous infusion of digoxin at 10 (IgG-treated group) or 50 (Fab-treated group) microgram/kg/min. Control animals given nonspecific rabbit or mouse Igs after the onset of digoxin-toxic ventricular arrhythmias all died. Administration of monoclonal digoxin-specific antibody as intact IgG in doses stoichiometrically equivalent to the digoxin dose fully reversed digoxin toxicity in six of eight animals and prolonged survival somewhat in the remaining two animals. Fab fragments from the Dig 26-10 monoclonal antibody were even more effective, with rapid reversal (mean time 7 min) of all arrhythmias and survival of all animals so treated. We conclude that murine monoclonal antibodies and their Fab fragments are capable of reversing advanced and otherwise lethal digoxin-induced arrhythmias in a guinea-pig experimental model and offer potential advantages over polyclonal antibodies in the management of this clinically important problem.

Animals↗

[Serum digoxin level in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy].

To investigate whether measuring levels of digoxin in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDC) is helpful in dose adjustment of digoxin we did the following study. In 77 patients (63 male, 14 female) with invasively verified IDC serum-digoxin levels were measured after a treatment period with beta-acetyldigoxin of at least 6 months. All patients received digoxin, 76 had ACE-inhibitors and 69 used diuretics. Mean serum-levels of digoxin were 0.96 ng/ml while using a mean daily dose of digoxin of 0.24 mg. Those who showed a serum level of digoxin within the recommended range took a slightly higher daily dose of digoxin when compared to those with low levels of digoxin (0.26 vs. 0.23 mg/day, p < 0.05). Therefore, we conclude that low serum-levels of digoxin are mainly caused by low intake of digoxin and it is justified to measure digoxin-levels in IDC-patients even if it increases costs.

Adult↗

[The effect of experimental extrahepatic cholestasis on absorption, distribution and elimination of digoxin].

Clinical observations indicate an increased number of post-operative complications and deaths in jaundiced patients. The patient may require some simultaneous treatment of concomitant ailments, among which cardiovascular diseases occur rather frequently. Some of the drugs administered then, like digoxin, are, in spite of being predominantly eliminated via the kidneys, metabolized in the liver, secreted into the bile or participating in the enterohepatic circulation. The changed pharmacokinetics of such drugs, in the case of mechanical jaundice, may be due to an altered liver status which can affect the function of the kidneys. The aim of the study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of digoxin administered both intravenously and into the stomach, in the state of mechanical, extrahepatic cholestasis. The study was carried out on male rabbits, divided randomly into four groups: the first two (experimental and control) were administered digoxin intragastrically and the next two groups (experimental and control)-intravenously (Tab. 1). The animals of the experimental groups had the bile ducts ligated, whereas the controls were sham-operated on. Digoxin was given to all the animals 4 days before the operation and 6 days after the surgery, in a dose of 0.02 mg/kg. Blood samples were collected ten times for 24 hours after the drug administration. Digoxin concentrations were determined by FPIA method, and pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by the two compartment open model for intragastric drug administration, and by the noncompartmental analysis for intravenous route. The levels of serum total bilirubin, creatinine, urea, glucose, albumin and activities of alanine, aspartate aminotransferases and alkaline phosphatase were estimated in all of the animals. The rabbits were sacrificed at the end of the study i.e. on the 7th day after the operation. The kidneys and the livers were weighed and examined macro- and microscopically. The laboratory tests as well as the anatomopathological investigations showed the symptoms of cholestasis and the hepatorenal syndrome (Tab. 2, 3). The blood serum concentrations of digoxin, both after intragastric and intravenous administration, were statistically higher during the whole observation period in the animals with obstructive cholestasis versus the controls (Tab. 4, 6). There were no significant alterations of digoxin parameters in the animals of the control groups, measured prior to and after the surgery. In the jaundiced animals, however, most of the pharmacokinetic parameters were markedly changed as compared with the preoperative values. In the rabbits which were given digoxin intragastrically, an increase in area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and in the peak concentration of the drug (Cmax) was noted (Tab. 5). Besides, the prolongation of mean residence time (MRT) and decrease in total body clearance (Cl) as well as apparent volume of distribution (Vz), were observed, as compared to the sham-operated controls. After the intravenous administration the following changes took place (Tab. 7): an increase in AUC, the prolongation of elimination half-life (t1/2 lambda z) and decrease in the total body clearance. All the above differences were statistically significant. Thus, digoxin, a drug predominantly eliminated via the kidney undergoes an impaired elimination in obstructive cholestasis. Basing on the results of the present study, the following statements could be expressed: (1) experimental, extrahepatic jaundice alters the pharmacokinetics of digoxin given intragastrically as well as intravenously; (2) the administration of therapeutic dose of digoxin in the state of mechanical jaundice may lead to its overdose; (3) obstruction of the common bile duct should indicate the necessity of monitoring the serum concentration of digoxin; (4) extrahepatic cholestasis may induce hepatorenal syndrome.

Absorption↗

[Preoperative digitalization. Measurement of digoxin plasma levels (author's transl)].

In a study of 233 patients from the department of surgery and anesthesiology taking digoxin preparations 64, per cent exhibit digoxin levels in the therapeutic range (0.6--1.5 ng/ml), 19 per cent had subtoxic concentrations ranged from 1.6--2.0 ng/ml and 7 per cent were in the toxic range (greater than 2 ng/ml). In patients treated with digoxin before admission to hospital subtherapeutic levels were most frequent. An average loading dose of digoxin 1 mg or more on one day may result in subtoxic and toxic digoxin levels on the second day, in patients receiving less than 1 mg digoxin daily an increasing frequency of plasma digoxin concentrations of 1.5 ng/ml or higher values was present on the third day. Averaged plasma digoxin concentrations were correlated with daily maintenance dose. There was, however, a wide individual variation in digoxin plasma concentrations. A low incidence of toxic digoxin plasma levels was observed in patients receiving a daily oral maintenance dose of 0.375 mg digoxin (Lanicor). For prophylactic digitalization of patients with normal renal and thyroid function the following schedules or statistical guidlines are proposed: Lanicor (bioavailability 60%): oral loading dose of 0.75 mg over two days, and then daily oral maintenance dose of 0.375 mg; Novodigal (bioavailability 80%): oral loading dose of 0.6 mg over two days and then daily oral maintenance dose of 0.3 mg; Digoxin i.v.: intravenous loading dose of 0.5 (0.4) mg over two days and then 0.25 (0.2) mg daily intravenous maintenance dose. For any patient needing treatment with digitalis glycosides therapy must be individual and dynamic. The reasons for toxic concentrations were frequently attributed to wrong dosage.

Administration, Oral↗

Digoxin toxicity: primary sites of drug action on the sympathetic nervous system.

Increases and decreases in sympathetic nerve activity have been reported to accompany digitalis-induced arrhythmias. These effects may result from drug action on various sites such as the central nervous system, ganglia, chemoreceptor or baroreceptor afferent fibers or peripheral efferent nerve fibers. The relative importance of each possible site of drug action has not been clarified. To define the involvement of some of these sites, digoxin was administered intravenously to cats in order to study its effects on activity of preganglionic splanchnic or postganglionic inferior cardiac nerves in the presence or absence of chemoreceptor and baroreceptor reflexes. In cats with intact reflexes, arrhythmic doses of digoxin had diverse effects on postganglionic activity. In some cats digoxin increased activity and in others it decreased activity. In contrast, digoxin consistently caused large progressive increases in postganglionic activity when baroreceptors and chemoreceptors had been denervated. Digoxin inhibited preganglionic nerve activity only in cats with intact reflexes but had no effect in those without chemoreceptor and baroreceptor reflexes. Thus, the afferent component of the baroreceptor reflex is the apparent site of digoxin-induced inhibition. Digoxin produced increases in activity above control only in postganglionic nerves. This finding suggests that digoxin acts on the ganglion to increase sympathetic activity. Digoxin had no discernible effect on preganglionic activity when baroreceptor and chemoreceptor afferent input had been eliminated. To test further for any subliminal drug effect in the brain, effects of intravenously administered digoxin were observed on centrally evoked submaximal responses in the splanchnic nerve. Lethal doses of digoxin had no effect on responses evoked from the medulla or the hypothalamus. Therefore, these data are not consistent with the hypothesis that a primary site of drug action is in the central nervous system. Instead, the data suggest that neural effects of digoxin result primarily from drug actions within the peripheral autonomic nervous system on sites such as the ganglion and peripheral afferent components of the baroreceptor reflex.

Animals↗

Digoxin toxicity: an evaluation in current clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: Serum digoxin concentrations (SDCs) are frequently sampled before completion of drug distribution. If elevated, these concentrations may be misinterpreted, potentially leading to a misdiagnosis of digoxin toxicity. OBJECTIVES: To determine the frequency of elevated SDCs (>2.6 nmol/L [>2.0 ng/mL]) obtained at appropriate postdosing intervals and to evaluate the frequency of clinically defined digoxin toxicity in patients with elevated SDCs. METHODS: The medical records of adult patients with SDCs assayed at 5 general hospitals in North Carolina during a 3-month period (May 1 through July 31, 1996) were prospectively evaluated. Data on SDC, inpatient or outpatient status, and medical or surgical service were collected for all patients. Data on patient demographics, serum chemistry values, indication for digoxin treatment, clinical evidence of digoxin toxicity, and timing of the blood sample relative to administration of the last dose of digoxin were collected for patients with SDCs higher than 2.6 nmol/L (>2.0 ng/mL). RESULTS: Of 3434 SDCs assayed in 2009 patients, 320 (9.3%) were higher than 2.6 nmol/L (>2.0 ng/mL). Fifty-one (15.9%) of the 320 SDCs were drawn at 6 hours or less following a digoxin dose. Sampling time relative to the digoxin dose could not be determined in 70 (21.9%) of the 320 elevated SDCs, leaving 199 (62.2%) of 320 SDCs in 138 patients evaluable for digoxin toxicity. Eighty-three of the 138 patients had clinical evidence of digoxin toxicity for an overall incidence of 4.1%. CONCLUSIONS: Digoxin toxicity occurs less frequently than historically reported. Continued emphasis needs to be placed on obtaining appropriately timed SDCs.

Adult↗

A previously unrecognized drug interaction between quinidine and digoxin.

Following the development of digoxin radioimmunoassay, we noted that serum digoxin concentrations appeared to rise in patients given quinidine. To further evaluate this important possible interaction between digoxin and quinidine, charts from 863 cardiology patients were reviewed. Ninety two patients received both drugs after having been on digoxin alone; 38 were ineligible for the study because of insufficient data and 27 were excluded because of changing renal function and/or concomitant antiarrhythmic drug therapy, leaving 27. Serum digoxin increased in 25 of the 27 study patients (93%) during quinidine therapy; mean serum digoxin rose from 1.4 ng/ml before quinidine to 3.2 ng/ml during quinidine. Anorexia, nausea and/or vomiting developed in 16 patients (59%) during quinidine therapy, but disappeared in all 10 patients in whom digoxin alone was reduced in dose, suggesting that digoxin had a causative role in the appearance of these symptoms although they developed only after quinidine had begun. Three of thirteen patients with only atrial arrhythmias on digoxin prior to quinidine developed new ventricular premature depolarizations (VPD) after starting quinidine; two of these three as well as four patients with prior VPDs developed new ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, asystole, or sudden death. When starting quinidine in patients who are taking digoxin, the clinical course, ECG and serum digoxin should be followed closely.

Adult↗

Digoxin bioavailability: formulations and rates of infusions.

The bioavailability of digoxin (lanoxin) tablets, oral aqueous solution of digoxin, and capsules containing a solution of digoxin was compared with digoxin given intravenously over 1 and 3 hr. The mean peak serum concentration of digoxin after the 1-hr intravenous infusion was 5 ng/ml, after the 3-hr infusion, 3.5 ng/ml, and after the oral solution, 2.0 ng/ml. There was an equivalent bioavailability of the oral solution and reference tablets of digoxin. The digoxin in capsules tended to be better absorbed than the reference tablets. There was 21% more digoxin excreted over 6 days after the 3 hr iv infusion than after the 1 hr iv infusion. This indicates that the calculated bioavailability of an orally administered dose of digoxin may vary with the rapidity of injection of the intravenous standard. It is estimated that an oral tablet of digoxin of 0.5 mg has about the same bioavailability as 0.35 of digoxin given by slow intravenous infusion (or 0.4 mg if calculated against a rapid intravenous injection).

Administration, Oral↗

Assessment of the potential pharmacokinetic interaction between digoxin and ethmozine.

The potential for a pharmacokinetic interaction between the investigational antiarrhythmic drug ethmozine (moricizine HCl, the generic name that is infrequently used in existing literature) and digoxin was evaluated in nine healthy male adults. Serum and urinary digoxin concentrations were measured by radioimmunoassay following intravenous digoxin administration before and during steady-state ethmozine dosing. Plasma ethmozine levels following a single oral dose were measured before and after a single intravenous dose of digoxin. A mean elimination half-life of 45.6 hours was determined for digoxin alone, compared to 43.1 hours in combination with ethmozine. Average values for digoxin systemic clearance, apparent volume of distribution, and renal clearance were 2.87 mL/min/kg, 11.3 L/kg, and 2.44 mL/min/kg, respectively for digoxin alone, compared to 3.01 mL/min/kg, 11.3 L/kg, and 2.64 mL/min/kg, respectively for digoxin with ethmozine. A mean half-life of 2.0 hours was determined for ethmozine alone, compared with 1.8 hours following a single intravenous dose of digoxin. No change was observed in the oral pharmacokinetics of ethmozine following a single intravenous dose of digoxin, as indicated by the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve, Cmax or Tmax. These findings suggest that no pharmacokinetic interaction occurs when single intravenous doses of digoxin are co-administered with multiple oral doses of ethmozine.

Adult↗

A new enzyme-linked chemiluminescent immunosorbent digoxin assay is virtually free from interference of spironolactone, potassium canrenoate, and their common metabolite canrenone.

Spironolactone and potassium canrenoate (aldosterone antagonist diuretics) are sometimes used in conjunction with digoxin for patient management. Spironolactone, potassium canrenoate, and their common metabolite canrenone interfere with serum digoxin measurement using various immunoassays. Recently a new enzyme-linked chemiluminescent immunosorbent digoxin assay (ECLIA-Digoxin) became commercially available for application on the ADVIA IMS 800i modular system (Bayer HealthCare, Tarrytown, NY). We investigated the potential interference of spironolactone and related compounds in this assay by comparing the results with the fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA), which is known to have significant cross-reactivity with these compounds as well as a turbidimetric assay for digoxin with no known cross-reactivity with spironolactone and related compounds. Aliquots of drug free serum were supplemented with therapeutic and above therapeutic concentrations of spironolactone, canrenone, and potassium canrenoate, and apparent digoxin concentrations were measured. No apparent digoxin concentration was observed using the ECLIA-Digoxin or turbidimetric assay. When serum pools prepared from patients receiving digoxin were further supplemented with these compounds, we observed no significant change in digoxin concentrations in the presence of these compounds with the ECLIA-Digoxin. We conclude that this assay is virtually free from interferences from spironolactone, potassium canrenoate and their common metabolite canrenone.

Artifacts↗

Erythrocyte Na+, K+-ATPase and serum digoxin concentrations.

Digoxin therapy has been made more rational by the measurement of serum digoxin concentrations. However, difficulties remain because of the overlap between "therapeutic" and "toxic" serum concentrations and the lack of an obvious therapeutic endpoint in many patients. An assay which measures the degree of interaction between digoxin and its putative receptor, the membrane Na+, K+-ATPase, might be capable of resolving some of these difficulties. Therefore, as a first approach in this direction we evaluated the relationship between serum digoxin concentration and the degree of inhibition of RBC ghost Na+, K+-ATPase activity in patients receiving digoxin therapy. Utilizing an improved micro-assay technique, Na+, K+-ATPase activity was determined in aliquots of RBC ghosts before and after removal of bound digoxin. In 27 patients a significant relationship was present between serum digoxin concentration and the degree of RBC ghost Na+, K+-ATPase inhibition. However, at any serum digoxin concentration, there was a variation in the magnitude of enzyme inhibition from patient to patient. This study confirms the feasibility of determining the degree of in vivo RBC Na+, K+-ATPase inhibition in man and demonstrates, for the first time, a highly significant but somewhat variable relationship between serum digoxin concentrations and the magnitude of RBC digoxin receptor inactivation. This quantitative, functional, individualized assay of digoxin effects may prove to be of clinical value in the future.

Digoxin↗

Effect of quinidine on digoxin bioavailability.

To evaluate the possible effect of quinidine on digoxin bioavailability, the steady state digoxin kinetics was examined with and without concomitant quinidine therapy, in 7 cardiac patients after simultaneous administration of oral digoxin and intravenous [3H]-digoxin. In the presence of quinidine, the absorption rate constant of digoxin (ka) increased from 2.72 +/- 1.04 to 3.53 +/- 1.34 h-1 (p less than 0.05), whereas lag time and peak time decreased from 0.16 +/- 0.10 to 0.05 +/- 0.04 h (p less than 0.05) and from 0.92 +/- 0.27 to 0.69 +/- 0.19 h (p less than 0.02), respectively. Predose plasma digoxin increased from 0.41 +/- 0.25 to 0.70 +/- 0.31 ng/ml (p less than 0.02), while peak plasma digoxin increased from 0.93 +/- 0.34 to 1.63 +/- 0.46 ng/ml (p less than 0.02). The systemic availability of digoxin increased from 68.48 +/- 13.35 to 79.09 +/- 14.89% (p less than 0.05) in the presence of quinidine. Quinidine had no effect on the biotransformation pattern of digoxin, as assessed by thin layer chromatography. Quinidine increases the rate and extent of digoxin absorption, and this interaction contributes significantly to the elevation in plasma digoxin during both its distribution and elimination phases.

Aged↗

Comparison of the canine tissue distribution of digoxin after acute and chronic administration: implications for digitalis therapy.

Digoxin is often used as an antiarrhythmic and inotropic agent. It produces significant neuroexcitatory responses that influence both its therapeutic and toxic effects. Patients receiving digoxin can be separated into 2 groups: those who receive it acutely and those who receive it chronically. The therapeutic and toxic responses to digoxin vary between these groups. The neural tissue distribution of digoxin was compared in dogs after both acute and chronic injections. Acute administration of digitalis in this study was associated with preferential uptake of digoxin into peripheral sympathetic nerves. Chronic administration was associated with continued selective uptake into the central nervous system despite decreasing serum levels. Therefore, acute (experimental or suicidal) or chronic (maintenance) digoxin administration produces different neural responses. The peripheral sympathetic nervous system will be the primary area of interaction with acute digoxin administration and the central nervous system will have a greater involvement with chronic digoxin administration. Our results indicate that the uptake of digoxin into the peripheral nervous system and central nervous system depends upon the duration of digoxin administration. The time course of digoxin accumulation influences both its therapeutic and toxic actions.

Animals↗