Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Defecography”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 469 records · Page 26Linked to original sources
PubMed2000

Quantitation of defecation function using radionuclide artificial stool in children with chronic constipation.

We aimed to investigate the value of scintigraphically determined evacuation fraction (EVF) as an objective follow-up criterion in medically treated children with chronic constipation, and to evaluate the relation between patients' symptoms and rectal emptying rate. Thirty children (m: 22, f: 8, mean age: 8.9 +/- 0.9 year) suffering from chronic constipation were assessed by scintigraphic evacuation study. All patients underwent anal manometric and scintigraphic examinations before their therapy was started. During 3 months, they received conventional laxative treatment for constipation, and scintigraphic studies were repeated in 20 of 30 patients. Scintigraphic examinations consisted of instillation of artificial stool into the rectum up to the volume impending rectal evacuation, and acquisition of pre- and post-evacuation images. EVF values were then calculated from the images using a fixed region of interest. All of the patients had high resting anal canal pressure (75 +/- 12 mmHg) and had positive rectoanal inhibitory reflex. In 14/20 patients (70%) who benefited from therapy, mean EVF changed from 43.6% to 62.2% (p < 0.001), while decreasing in 6120 who did not benefit. The volume arousing rectal evacuation was significantly lower at the second scintigraphic study (261 +/- 98 ml) than the first study (354 +/- 138 ml) (p < 0.05). As a conclusion: 1) EVF was low in chronically constipated children, 2) it was improved after conventional laxative treatment and, 3) radionuclide EVF determination may be a useful method for follow-up.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Responses of anal constipation to biofeedback treatment.

OBJECTIVE: Biofeedback is considered an effective treatment for anal constipation, but a substantial proportion of patients fail to improve. Our aim was to identify the key predictors of outcome using a comprehensive standardized evaluation of anorectal function. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively analysed the clinical and physiological data of 148 patients consecutively treated for constipation due to functional outlet obstruction by biofeedback. Clinical evaluation was performed by means of a structured questionnaire. Anorectal evaluation included anal pressure, neural reflexes, defecatory dynamics, rectal compliance, rectal sensitivity and balloon expulsion test. Biofeedback treatment was performed using a manometric technique. The clinical response to biofeedback treatment was evaluated as good (improvement of constipation) or poor (no improvement or worsening). RESULTS: Of the 148 patients included, 112 (86 F, 26 M; age range 8-67 years) were followed-up for between 1 and 44 months, and 66% had a good response to treatment. The response depended on the severity of the defecatory dysfunction. Thus, lack of anal relaxation during straining and inability to evacuate a 1 ml intrarectal balloon were inversely related to physiological variables related to therapeutic success. Among the 49 patients with absent anal relaxation, 51% had a good response to treatment (versus 78% in patients with partial relaxation; p < 0.01), and among the 29 patients with failed balloon expulsion, 48% responded to treatment (versus 74% in patients able to evacuate > or = 1 ml intrarectal balloon; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Even in the presence of negative predictors, biofeedback is a valuable treatment option in a substantial proportion of constipated patients.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Peritoneocele and enterocele. Formation and transformation during rectal evacuation as studied by means of defaeco-peritoneography.

PURPOSE: To study, by means of defaeco-peritoneography, the formation and transformation of the peritoneocele, with and without an enterocele, during rectal evacuation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-six patients with a peritoneocele at defaeco-peritoneography were selected for the study, and examined at three different stages: 1) at the start with a contrast-filled rectum; 2) at maximum straining; and 3) at rest after rectal evacuation. RESULTS: Fourteen patients had a peritoneocele at the start. These peritoneoceles were largest at maximum straining and were all still present at rest after rectal evacuation. In 32 patients defaeco-peritoneography was regarded as normal at the start. At maximum straining these patients developed a peritoneocele and 20 of these were still present after rectal evacuation. No enterocele was seen at the start. At maximum straining 21 patients developed an enterocele and 15 of these were still present after rectal evacuation. Liquid in varying amounts was found in the peritoneoceles. CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrated that peritoneoceles were present at different stages of the defaeco-peritoneographic investigations. Peritoneoceles were most frequent and largest at maximum straining. An enterocele was present in half of the peritoneoceles at maximum straining, but never at the start. Liquid was often present in the peritoneoceles.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Whole gut transit is prolonged after Ripstein rectopexy.

OBJECTIVE: To find out if there are changes in transit time after Ripstein rectopexy and whether measurement of whole gut transit time preoperatively can predict postoperative constipation. DESIGN: Prospective open study. SETTING: Teaching hospital, Sweden. SUBJECTS: 30 patients undergoing Ripstein rectopexy for rectal prolapse (n = 17) or internal rectal intussusception (n = 13). METHODS: Whole-gut transit studies and recording of symptoms of constipation preoperatively and postoperatively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Constipation and retention of markers. RESULTS: Significantly more markers were retained in postoperative compared with preoperative transit studies (p < 0.001). Constipation mainly presented as emptying difficulties and there was no increase in the total number of patients who reported emptying difficulties postoperatively. There was a weak but significant correlation between retention of markers preoperatively and postoperative emptying difficulties (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Whole gut transit was prolonged after Ripstein rectopexy. Preoperative retention of markers indicated an increased risk of postoperative constipation.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Open-magnet MR defaecography compared with evacuation proctography in the diagnosis and management of patients with rectal intussusception.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether open-magnet magnetic resonance (MR) defaecography could provide more useful clinical information than evacuation proctography (EP) alone in the evaluation of a cohort of patients with full-thickness rectal intussusception and could assist in decisions concerning management. METHODS: Ten patients (4 male; median age 43, range 30-65) with symptomatic circumferential rectal intussusception diagnosed on EP, underwent open-magnet MR defaecography. Pathologies visible with each technique were recorded and 12 parameters of anorectal configuration and morphology measured and compared. RESULTS: There was discordance in the diagnosis of rectal intussusception in three cases. In another two patients, MR defaecography demonstrated mucosal descent only. Measurements of anorectal configuration and morphology were similar between techniques; only rectal size and lateral dimensions of the rectocoele were significantly different, being smaller on MR defaecography than EP. Two patients were shown on MR defaecography to have significant bladder descent and two female patients had significant vaginal descent. CONCLUSION: EP remains the first line investigation for the diagnosis of rectal intussusception, but may not distinguish mucosal from full-thickness descent. MR defaecography further complements EP by giving information on movements of the whole pelvic floor, 30% of the patients studied having associated abnormal anterior and/or middle pelvic organ descent. If surgery is planned for patients with rectal intussusception, MR defaecography provides useful information regarding the presence and degree of anterior pelvic compartment descent that may need to be addressed if a good functional outcome is to be achieved.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Anorectal physiology in relation to clinical subgroups of patients with severe constipation.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate anorectal physiology in relation to clinically defined subgroups of patients with idiopathic constipation and to analyse relationships between anorectal physiology and rectal evacuation. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: One hundred consecutive patients with idiopathic constipation were clinically categorized as slow transit (n=19), outlet obstruction (n=52) and a group with mixed symptoms (n=29). They were examined by recording anal pressures and also rectal volumes in response to stepwise increases in rectal pressure (5-60 cm H2O). The manovolumetric results were compared with 28 sex and aged matched controls. Rectal evacuation was measured by computer-based image analysis of rectal emptying rate in defaecography. RESULTS: The rectal pressure thresholds for filling, urge and pain did not differ between the groups but there were proportionally more patients in the slow transit and mixed group with thresholds for filling exceeding 25 cm H2O (P=0.04). In total, 18% of patients had impaired sensitivity which was associated with long duration of symptoms (P < 0.05). Patients with grossly impaired rectal sensitivity (filling threshold > 40 cm H2O) had impaired rectal evacuation (P < 0.05). The rectal compliance was increased in the slow transit and mixed group (P < 0.01-0.05) in the pressure interval 5-15 cm H2O. Anal resting and squeeze pressures did not differ between the groups although 7/19 in the slow transit group had values around the lower limit of controls. Slow wave frequency was lower in all patient groups (P < 0.001 vs. controls). Rectal evacuation was not related to sphincter function or to rectal compliance. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical categorization of constipated patients defines groups where altered anorectal physiology is not uncommon. Constipation with symptoms of infrequent defaecation may be associated with impaired rectal sensitivity and increased rectal compliance whereas outlet obstruction symptoms are not clearly related to changes in anorectal physiology.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

A prospective evaluation of occult disorders in obstructed defecation using the 'iceberg diagram'.

OBJECTIVE: Surgical treatment of constipation and obstructed defecation (OD) carries frequent recurrences, as OD is an 'iceberg syndrome' characterized by 'underwater rocks' or occult diseases which may affect the outcome of surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate occult disorders in order to alert the clinician of these and minimize failures. METHOD: One hundred consecutive constipated patients with OD symptoms, 81 female patients, median age 52 years, underwent perineal examination, proctoscopy, anorectal manometry, and anal/vaginal ultrasound. Anorectal physiology and imaging tests were also carried out when indicated, as well as psychological and urogynaecological consultation. Symptoms were graded using a modified 1-20 constipation score. Both evident (e.g. rectocele) and occult (e.g. anismus) diseases were prospectively evaluated using a novel 'iceberg diagram'. The type of treatment, whether conservative or surgical, was also recorded. RESULTS: Fifty-four (54%) patients had both mucosal prolapse and rectocele. All patients had at least two occult OD-related diseases, 66 patients had at least three: anxiety-depression, anismus and rectal hyposensation were the most frequent (66%, 44% and 33% respectively). The median constipation score was 11 (range 2-20), the median number of 'occult disorders' was 5 (range 2-8). Conservative treatment was carried out in most patients. Surgery was carried out in 14 (14%) patients. CONCLUSION: The novel 'iceberg diagram' allowed the adequate evaluation of OD-related occult diseases and better selection of patients for treatment. Most were managed conservatively, and only a minority were treated by surgery.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Obstructive defecation: a failure of rectoanal coordination.

OBJECTIVE: The pathophysiology of obstructive defecation is unclear. We investigated whether impaired rectoanal coordination causes obstructive defecation and if this dysfunction can be corrected by biofeedback therapy. METHODS: We prospectively studied 25 healthy subjects and 35 consecutive patients with constipation (>1 year) with anorectal manometry and balloon expulsion test. Symptoms were assessed from diary cards. Patients found to have obstructive defecation were offered biofeedback therapy. After treatment, their defecation dynamics and symptoms were reassessed. RESULTS: Eighteen patients had obstructive defecation and 17 had normal defecation dynamics (nonobstructive). Five normals (20%) exhibited obstructive pattern but only one failed to expel balloon. In the obstructive group, during straining, the intrarectal pressure and defecation index were lower (p < 0.05), and anal residual pressure was higher (p < 0.01) when compared with the nonobstructive group or normals. After biofeedback therapy, the intrarectal pressure and defecation index increased (p < 0.02) and anal residual pressure decreased (p < 0.001); stool frequency, degree of straining, and bowel satisfaction scores improved (p < 0.05); 67% stopped laxatives and 11 patients discontinued stooling with digitation. CONCLUSION: Patients with obstructive defecation showed impaired rectal contraction, paradoxical anal contraction, or inadequate anal relaxation. These features suggest that rectoanal coordination was impaired. Biofeedback therapy rectified these pathophysiological disturbances and improved constipation.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Descending perineum syndrome: audit of clinical and laboratory features and outcome of pelvic floor retraining.

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to retrospectively analyze the Mayo Clinic experience of descending perineum syndrome from 1987-1997. METHODS: Clinical records were abstracted for demographic features, risk factors, results of anorectal and defecation tests, and a mailed questionnaire evaluated outcome and current symptoms. RESULTS: All results are mean +/- SD. Clinically, 39 patients (38 women, one man), mean age 53+/-14 yr, presented with constipation (97%), incomplete rectal evacuation (92%), excessive straining (97%), digital rectal evacuation (38%), and fecal incontinence (15%). Laboratory tests showed anal sphincter resting pressure was 54+/-26 mm Hg, and squeeze pressure was 96+/-35 mm Hg; expulsion from the rectum of a 50-ml balloon required > 200 g added weight in 27%; perineal descent was 4.4+/-1 cm (normal < 4 cm) by scintigraphy. Scintigraphic evacuation, rectoanal angle change during defecation, and perineal descent were abnormal in 23%, 57%, and 78% of the patients, respectively. Associated features included female gender (96%), multiparity with vaginal delivery (55%), hysterectomy or cystocele/rectocele repair (74%). On follow-up, 64% responded; 17 of these 25 responders underwent pelvic floor retraining. At 2-yr median follow-up (range, 1-6 yr), 12 still experienced constipation or excessive straining; their perineal descent was greater than in patients who responded to retraining (p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Descending perineum syndrome is identifiable by clinical history and examination, and the most prevalent abnormality on testing is perineal descent > 4 cm; rectal balloon expulsion is an insensitive screening test for descending perineum syndrome. Pelvic floor retraining is a suboptimal treatment for this chronic disorder of rectal evacuation; the extent of perineal descent appears to be a useful predictor of response to retraining.

Anal Canal↗
PubMed1999

The longitudinal high-pressure zone profile in patients with fecal incontinence.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate differences in the longitudinal high-pressure zone (HPZ) profile between incontinent patients and healthy controls. METHODS: One hundred and fifty-six patients with fecal incontinence (mean age 63 yr; 139 women, 17 men) and 25 healthy controls (mean age 54 yr; 20 women, five men) underwent anorectal manometry with a perfused catheter using a station pull-through technique. RESULTS: Maximum resting pressure (MRP) and maximum squeeze pressure (MSP) were lower in patients (p < 0.001) and the HPZ was shorter in patients (p < 0.05). The ratio MRP/sum of resting pressures within HPZ did not differ between the groups. The severity of incontinence measured as an incontinence score was correlated to MSP (p < 0.05) and sum of squeeze pressure within HPZ (p < 0.05), but not to any other variable. The relative pressure amount during rest in the distal half of HPZ was higher in controls (63% vs 56%, p < 0.05), but this was not seen during squeeze. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the main difference between incontinent patients and healthy controls is a greater magnitude of the pressure profile in the latter group. Furthermore, the relative pressure accumulation during rest tended to be more distally located within the HPZ.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Sensory retraining is key to biofeedback therapy for formed stool fecal incontinence.

OBJECTIVES: Biofeedback is a nonsurgical treatment that reportedly produces good results in 65-75% of fecally incontinent patients. However, previous studies have not ruled out nonspecific treatment effects. It is also unknown whether biofeedback works primarily by improving the strength of the striated pelvic floor muscles or by improving the rectal perception. We aimed to 1) evaluate the efficacy of biofeedback in formed-stool fecal incontinence, 2) assess the relative contribution of sensory and strength retraining to biofeedback outcomes, and 3) identify patient characteristics that predict a good response to treatment. METHODS: Twenty-four patients with frequent (at least once a week) solid-stool incontinence were provided with three to four biofeedback sessions. They were taught to squeeze in response to progressively weaker rectal distentions. Patients were re-evaluated by anorectal manometry and symptom diary 3 months after completing training and by diary and interview 6-12 months after training. RESULTS: Seventeen (71%) were classified responders; 13 became continent and four reduced incontinence frequency by at least 75%. Clinical improvements were maintained at 12-month follow-up. At 3-month follow-up, responders had significantly lower thresholds for perception of rectal distention and for sphincter contraction, but squeeze pressures did not significantly differ from those of nonresponders. Baseline measures that predicted a favorable response were sensory threshold (50 ml or less), urge threshold (100 ml or less), lower threshold for sphincter contraction, and lower threshold for the rectoanal inhibitory reflex; neither anal squeeze pressure nor severity of incontinence predicted treatment outcome. CONCLUSIONS: In solid-stool fecal incontinence biofeedback training effects are robust and seem not to be explained by expectancy or nonspecific treatment effect. Sensory retraining appears to be more relevant than strength training to the success of biofeedback.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Rectal sensorimotor dysfunction in patients with urge faecal incontinence: evidence from prolonged manometric studies.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Although external anal sphincter dysfunction is the major cause of urge faecal incontinence, approximately 50% of such patients have evidence of rectal hypersensitivity and report exaggerated stool frequency and urgency. The contribution of rectosigmoid contractile activity to the pathophysiology of this condition is unclear, and thus the relations between symptoms, rectal sensation, and rectosigmoid motor function were investigated. METHODS: Fifty two consecutive patients with urge faecal incontinence, referred to a tertiary surgical centre, and 24 volunteers, underwent comprehensive anorectal physiological investigation, including prolonged rectosigmoid manometry. Patients were classified on the basis of balloon distension thresholds into those with rectal hypersensitivity (n = 27) and those with normal rectal sensation (n = 25). Automated quantitative analysis of overall rectosigmoid contractile activities and, specifically, high amplitude contractions and rectal motor complex activity was performed. RESULTS: External anal sphincter dysfunction was similar in both patient groups. Overall, phasic activity and high amplitude contraction frequency were greater, and rectal motor complex variables significantly altered, in those with rectal hypersensitivity. Symptoms, more prevalent in the rectal hypersensitivity group, were also more often associated with rectosigmoid contractile events. For individuals, reduced compliance and increased rectal motor complex frequency were only observed in patients with rectal hypersensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: We have identified a subset of patients with urge faecal incontinence-namely, those with rectal hypersensitivity-who demonstrated increased symptoms, enhanced perception, reduced compliance, and exaggerated rectosigmoid motor activity. Comprehensive assessment of rectosigmoid sensorimotor function, in addition to evaluation of anal function, should be considered in the investigation of patients with urge faecal incontinence.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Colonic transit time and rectoanal videomanometry in Parkinson's disease.

BACKGROUND: Constipation is a prominent lower gastrointestinal tract dysfunction that occurs frequently in Parkinson's disease (PD). OBJECTIVE: To investigate colonic transport and dynamic rectoanal behaviour during filling and defecation in patients with PD. METHODS: Colonic transit time (CTT) and rectoanal videomanometry analyses were performed in 12 patients with PD (10 men and 2 women; mean age, 68 years, mean duration of disease, five years; mean Hoehn and Yahr grade, 3; decreased stool frequency (<3 times a week) in six, difficulty in stool expulsion in eight) and 10 age matched normal control subjects (7 men and 3 women; mean age, 62 years; decreased stool frequency in two, difficulty in stool expulsion in two). RESULTS: In the PD patients, CTT was significantly prolonged in the rectosigmoid segment (p<0.05) and total colon (p<0.01) compared with the control subjects. At the resting state, anal closure and squeeze pressures of PD patients were lower than those in control subjects, though not statistically significant. However, the PD patients showed a smaller increase in abdominal pressure on coughing (p<0.01) and straining (p<0.01). The sphincter motor unit potentials of the patients were normal. During filling, PD patients showed normal rectal volumes at first sensation and maximum desire to defecate, and normal rectal compliance. However, they showed smaller amplitude in phasic rectal contraction (p<0.05), which was accompanied by an increase in anal pressure that normally decreased, together with leaking in two patients. During defecation, most PD patients could not defecate completely with larger post-defecation residuals (p<0.01). PD patients had weak abdominal strain and smaller rectal contraction on defecation than those in control subjects, though these differences were not statistically significant. However, the PD patients had larger anal contraction on defecation (p<0.05), evidence of paradoxical sphincter contraction on defecation (PSD). CONCLUSIONS: Slow colonic transit, decreased phasic rectal contraction, weak abdominal strain, and PSD were all features in our PD patients with frequent constipation.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Evacuation proctography: a prospective study of diagnostic and therapeutic effects.

PURPOSE: To determine the diagnostic and therapeutic effects of evacuation proctography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-seven referring clinicians completed preevacuation proctography questionnaires for 50 patients, detailing diagnoses, confidence in these, intended management, and what they hoped to learn. After evacuation proctography, the radiology report was returned with a second questionnaire asking the diagnosis in the light of evacuation proctographic findings, their confidence, and what they had learned. Clinicians quantified management contribution and indicated how useful they found evacuation proctography in general. Results from pre- and post-evacuation proctography questionnaires were compared to determine the diagnostic and therapeutic effects. RESULTS: Diagnostic confidence rose significantly after evacuation proctography (mean, 7.0 before evacuation proctography vs 8.4 after evacuation proctography; P < .001). Lead diagnosis changed in nine (18%) patients. Intended surgical management became nonsurgical after evacuation proctography in seven (14%) patients, and intended nonsurgical therapy became surgical in two (4%). Surgery remained likely in 15 patients, but its nature changed in five (10%). Five (10%) clinicians stated that evacuation proctographic findings resolved diagnostic conflict, and nine (18%) found that evacuation proctographic findings revealed unsuspected diagnoses. Clinicians found evacuation proctography of major benefit in 20 (40%) cases studied and of moderate benefit in 20 (40%). In general, 20 (43%) clinicians found evacuation proctography very useful and 24 (51%) found it moderately useful. CONCLUSION: Evacuation proctography has a substantial diagnostic and therapeutic effect and is of considerable benefit to referring clinicians.

Defecography↗
PubMed2000

Upright dynamic MR defaecating proctography in an open configuration MR system.

We describe our experience evaluating an MR proctography technique using an open 0.5 T MR system. Evacuation of a gadolinium-containing rectal contrast agent was dynamically imaged in the upright position using a fast gradient echo sequence. Anatomical and functional abnormalities were documented. Results from 40 patients who underwent this technique are reported. The method is proposed as an alternative to conventional fluoroscopic proctography.

Adult↗