Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “stalled replication fork”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 451 records · Page 25Linked to original sources

RNA polymerase modulators and DNA repair activities resolve conflicts between DNA replication and transcription.

Organisms rely on close interplay between DNA replication, recombination, and repair to secure transmission of the genome. In rapidly dividing cells, there is also great pressure for transcription, which may induce conflict with replication. We investigated the potential for conflict in bacterial cells, where there is no temporal separation of these processes. Eliminating the stringent response regulators ppGpp and DksA or the GreA and Mfd proteins, which revive or dislodge stalled transcription complexes, and especially combinations of these factors, is shown to severely reduce viability when DNA repair is also compromised. Both ppGpp and certain RNA polymerase (RNAP) mutations reduce accumulation of backed-up arrays of stalled transcription complexes. We propose these arrays are formidable obstacles to replication that are normally kept in check in wild-type cells by ppGpp, DksA, GreA, and Mfd. When arrays do obstruct replication, the consequences are resolved by one of the many pathways available to rescue stalled forks.

DNA Repair↗

The yeast Sgs1 helicase is differentially required for genomic and ribosomal DNA replication.

The members of the RecQ family of DNA helicases play conserved roles in the preservation of genome integrity. RecQ helicases are implicated in Bloom and Werner syndromes, which are associated with genomic instability and predisposition to cancers. The human BLM and WRN helicases are required for normal S phase progression. In contrast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells deleted for SGS1 grow with wild-type kinetics. To investigate the role of Sgs1p in DNA replication, we have monitored S phase progression in sgs1Delta cells. Unexpectedly, we find that these cells progress faster through S phase than their wild-type counterparts. Using bromodeoxyuridine incorporation and DNA combing, we show that replication forks are moving more rapidly in the absence of the Sgs1 helicase. However, completion of DNA replication is strongly retarded at the rDNA array of sgs1Delta cells, presumably because of their inability to prevent recombination at stalled forks, which are very abundant at this locus. These data suggest that Sgs1p is not required for processive DNA synthesis but prevents genomic instability by coordinating replication and recombination events during S phase.

Bromodeoxyuridine↗

Functional uncoupling of twin polymerases: mechanism of polymerase dissociation from a lagging-strand block.

Replication forks are constantly subjected to events that lead to fork stalling, stopping, or collapse. Using a synthetic rolling circle DNA substrate, we demonstrate that a block to the lagging-strand polymerase does not compromise helicase or leading-strand polymerase activity. In fact, lagging-strand synthesis also continues. Thus, the blocked lagging-strand enzyme quickly dissociates from the block site and resumes synthesis on new primed sites. Furthermore, studies in which the lagging polymerase is continuously blocked show that the leading polymerase continues unabated even as it remains attached to the lagging-strand enzyme. Hence, upon encounter of a block to the lagging stand, the polymerases functionally uncouple yet remain physically associated. Further study reveals that naked single-stranded DNA results in disruption of a stalled polymerase from its beta-DNA substrate. Thus, as the replisome advances, the single-stranded DNA loop that accumulates on the lagging-strand template releases the stalled lagging-strand polymerase from beta after SSB protein is depleted. The lagging-strand polymerase is then free to continue Okazaki fragment production.

DNA↗

The ColE1 unidirectional origin acts as a polar replication fork pausing site.

Co-orientation of replication origins is the most common organization found in nature for multimeric plasmids. Streptococcus pyogenes broad-host-range plasmid pSM19035 and Escherichia coli pPI21 are among the exceptions. pPI21, which is a derivative of pSM19035 and pBR322, has two long inverted repeats, each one containing a potentially active ColE1 unidirectional origin. Analysis of pPI21 replication intermediates (RIs) by two-dimensional agarose gel electrophoresis and electron microscopy revealed the accumulation of a specific RI containing a single internal bubble. The data obtained demonstrated that initiation of DNA replication occurred at a single origin in pPI21. Progression of the replicating fork initiated at either of the two potential origins was transiently stalled at the other inversely oriented silent ColE1 origin of the plasmid. The accumulated RIs, containing an internal bubble, occurred as a series of stereoisomers with different numbers of knots in their replicated portion. These observations provide one of the first functional explanations for the disadvantage of head-to-head plasmid multimers with respect to head-to-tail ones.

Bacteriocin Plasmids↗

Expansion of DNA repeats in Escherichia coli: effects of recombination and replication functions.

Duplication or expansion of directly repeated sequence elements is associated with a number of human genetic diseases. To study the mechanisms of repeat expansion, we have developed a plasmid assay in Escherichia coli. Our assay involves two simple repeats of 787 bp in length; expansion to three or more copies of the repeat can be selected by restoration of an intact tetracycline-resistance gene. Expansions occurred at relatively high rates, >10(-5), in the population. Both RecA-dependent recombination and RecA-independent slipped misalignments contributed to the observed expansion events. Mutations that impair DNA polymerase III (DnaE, DnaQ subunits) or the replication fork helicase, DnaB, stimulated both RecA-dependent and RecA-independent expansion events. In these respects, the properties of repeat expansion resemble repeat deletion and suggest that difficulties in DNA replication may trigger both classes of rearrangements. About 20% of the RecA-independent expansion events are accompanied by reciprocal sister-chromosome exchange, producing dimeric plasmids carrying one triplicated and one deleted locus. These products are explained by a model involving misaligned strands across the replication fork. This model predicts that the location of a replication stall site may govern the types of resulting rearrangements. The specific location of such a stall site can also, in theory, account for propensity towards expansion or deletion of repeat arrays. This may have relevance to trinucleotide repeat expansion in human genetic disease.

DNA Replication↗

Translesion synthesis in mammalian cells.

DNA damage blocks the progression of the replication fork. In order to circumvent the damaged bases, cells employ specialized low stringency DNA polymerases, which are able to carry out translesion synthesis (TLS) past different types of damage. The five polymerases used in TLS in human cells have different substrate specificities, enabling them to deal with many different types of damaged bases. PCNA plays a central role in recruiting the TLS polymerases and effecting the polymerase switch from replicative to TLS polymerase. When the fork is blocked PCNA gets ubiquitinated. This increases its affinity for the TLS polymerases, which all have novel ubiquitin-binding motifs, thereby facilitating their engagement at the stalled fork to effect TLS.

Animals↗

Recognition of the pro-mutagenic base uracil by family B DNA polymerases from archaea.

Archaeal family B DNA polymerases contain a specialised pocket that binds tightly to template-strand uracil, causing the stalling of DNA replication. The mechanism of this unique "template-strand proof-reading" has been studied using equilibrium binding measurements, DNA footprinting, van't Hoff analysis and calorimetry. Binding assays have shown that the polymerase preferentially binds to uracil in single as opposed to double-stranded DNA. Tightest binding is observed using primer-templates that contain uracil four bases in front of the primer-template junction, corresponding to the observed stalling position. Ethylation interference analysis of primer-templates shows that the two phosphates, immediately flanking the uracil (NpUpN), are important for binding; contacts are also made to phosphates in the primer-strand. Microcalorimetry and van't Hoff analysis have given a fuller understanding of the thermodynamic parameters involved in uracil recognition. All the results are consistent with a "read-ahead" mechanism, in which the replicating polymerase scans the template, ahead of the replication fork, for the presence of uracil and halts polymerisation on detecting this base. Post-stalling events, serving to eliminate uracil, await full elucidation.

Archaea↗

DNA replication: keep moving and don't mind the gap.

As the replication fork progresses, synthesis of the discontinuous lagging strand requires frequent priming and cycling of the lagging strand polymerase to the new primers. It appears that this mechanism also permits bypass of template lesions on both strands, leaving the damage behind in a single-strand gap and precluding fork stalling or collapse.

DNA Replication↗

DNA binding domain in the replication checkpoint protein Mrc1 of Schizosaccharomyces pombe.

The replication checkpoint is activated when replication forks are obstructed by DNA lesions or protein complexes bound to DNA or when DNA synthesis is restrained by the limited availability of deoxyribonucleotides. This checkpoint preserves genome integrity by stabilizing stalled forks and delaying the onset of mitosis. In the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Mrc1 is a replication checkpoint adaptor protein that allows the sensor kinase Rad3-Rad26 to activate the effector kinase Cds1. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Mrc1 associates with replication forks and co-precipitates with the DNA replication protein Cdc45. Whether or not Mrc1 interacts directly with DNA is unknown. Here we define a approximately 150 amino acid DNA binding domain (DBD) in the N-terminal region of S. pombe Mrc1. The DBD interacts preferentially with branched DNA structures in vitro. Deletion of the DBD or point mutations that diminish its DNA binding activity render cells sensitive to the replication inhibitor hydroxyurea. These mutations also impair the replication checkpoint arrest. The DBD has a helix-loop-helix motif that is predicted to bind DNA. This motif is conserved in the recently identified N-terminal DBD of human Claspin, a presumptive homolog of yeast Mrc1 proteins.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗

swi1- and swi3-dependent and independent replication fork arrest at the ribosomal DNA of Schizosaccharomyces pombe.

Replication forks are arrested at specific sequences to facilitate a variety of DNA transactions. Forks also stall at sites of DNA damage, and the regression of stalled forks without rescue can cause genetic instability. Therefore, unraveling the mechanisms of fork arrest and of rescue of stalled forks is of considerable general interest. In Schizosaccharomyces pombe, products of two mating-type switching genes, swi1 and swi3, participate in fork arrest at the mating-type switch locus. Here, we show that these proteins also act at three termini (Ter) also called replication fork barriers in the spacer regions of rDNA but not at a fourth site, RFP4, which is nonfunctional when present in a plasmid. Two of the Swi1p- and Swi3p-dependent sites were also dependent on the transcription terminator Reb1p. Furthermore, hydroxyurea-induced replication stress mimicked the effect of swi1 or swi3 mutations at these sites. A swi1 mutant that failed to arrest forks at the mating-type fork barrier RTS1 was functional at the rDNA Ter sites, suggesting some specificity of action. Both WT and mutant forms of Swi1p were physically localized at the Ter sites in vivo. The results support the notion that Swi1p and Swi3p act at several different protein-DNA complexes in the rDNA spacer regions to arrest replication but that not all fork barriers required their activity to arrest forks.

Autoradiography↗

A transcribing RNA polymerase molecule survives DNA replication without aborting its growing RNA chain.

We have demonstrated elsewhere that a precisely placed, stalled Escherichia coli RNA polymerase ternary transcription complex (polymerase-RNA-DNA) stays on the DNA template after passage of a DNA replication fork. Moreover, the bypassed complex remains competent to resume elongation of its bound RNA chain. But the simplicity of our experimental system left several important questions unresolved: in particular, might the observation be relevant only to the particular ternary complex that we studied, and can the finding be generalized to a transcribing instead of a stalled RNA polymerase? To address these issues, we have created three additional ternary transcription complexes and examined their fates after passage of a replication fork. In addition, we have examined the fate of moving RNA polymerase molecules during DNA replication. The results suggest that our previous finding applies to all transcription intermediates of the E. coli RNA polymerase.

Adenosine Triphosphate↗

Architecture of the bacteriophage T4 replication complex revealed with nanoscale biopointers.

Our previous electron microscopy of DNA replicated by the bacteriophage T4 proteins showed a single complex at the fork, thought to contain the leading and lagging strand proteins, as well as the protein-covered single-stranded DNA on the lagging strand folded into a compact structure. "Trombone" loops formed from nascent lagging strand fragments were present on a majority of the replicating molecules (Chastain, P., Makhov, A. M., Nossal, N. G., and Griffith, J. D. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 21276-21285). Here we probe the composition of this replication complex using nanoscale DNA biopointers to show the location of biotin-tagged replication proteins. We find that a large fraction of the molecules with a trombone loop had two pointers to polymerase, providing strong evidence that the leading and lagging strand polymerases are together in the replication complex. 6% of the molecules had two loops, and 31% of these had three pointers to biotin-tagged polymerase, suggesting that the two loops result from two fragments that are being extended simultaneously. Under fixation conditions that extend the lagging strand, occasional molecules show two nascent lagging strand fragments, each being elongated by a biotin-tagged polymerase. T4 41 helicase is present in the complex on a large fraction of actively replicating molecules but on a smaller fraction of molecules with a stalled polymerase. Unexpectedly, we found that 59 helicase-loading protein remains on the fork after loading the helicase and is present on molecules with extensive replication.

Bacteriophage T4↗

The severe slow growth of Deltasrs2 Deltarqh1 in Schizosaccharomyces pombe is suppressed by loss of recombination and checkpoint genes.

Our interest in the Schizosaccharomyces pombe RecQ helicase, rqh1+, led us to investigate the function of a related putative DNA helicase, srs2+. We identified the srs2+ homolog in S.pombe, and found that srs2+ is not essential for cell viability. A Deltasrs2 Deltarqh1 double mutant grows extremely slowly with aberrant shaped cells and low viability. This slow growth does not appear to be related to stalled replication, as Deltasrs2 Deltarqh1 cells showed higher survival rates, compared with Deltarqh1, when stalled forks were increased by UV irradiation or hydroxy urea treatment. Consistent with this result, we found that Deltasrs2 Deltarqh1 cells progress through S-phase with a slight delay, but undergo a checkpoint-dependent arrest presumably at G2/M. Further, we found that Deltasrs2 Deltarqh1 slow growth is related to recombination, as loss of either the rhp51+ or rhp57+ recombination genes improves cell growth in the double mutant. Deltasrs2 is also synthetic lethal with Deltarhp54, another homologous recombination gene. This lethality is suppressed in a Deltarhp51 background. Together, these results demonstrate a clear genetic interaction between rqh1+, srs2+ and the genes of the homologous recombination pathway.

Cell Cycle↗

Replication checkpoint kinase Cds1 regulates recombinational repair protein Rad60.

Genome integrity is protected by Cds1 (Chk2), a checkpoint kinase that stabilizes arrested replication forks. How Cds1 accomplishes this task is unknown. We report that Cds1 interacts with Rad60, a protein required for recombinational repair in fission yeast. Cds1 activation triggers Rad60 phosphorylation and nuclear delocalization. A Rad60 mutant that inhibits regulation by Cds1 renders cells specifically sensitive to replication fork arrest. Genetic and biochemical studies indicate that Rad60 functions codependently with Smc5 and Smc6, subunits of an SMC (structural maintenance of chromosomes) complex required for recombinational repair. These studies indicate that regulation of Rad60 is an important part of the replication checkpoint response controlled by Cds1. We propose that control of Rad60 regulates recombination events at stalled forks.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

ATR homolog Mec1 promotes fork progression, thus averting breaks in replication slow zones.

Budding yeast Mec1, homolog of mammalian ATR, is an essential protein that mediates S-phase checkpoint responses and meiotic recombination. Elimination of Mec1 function leads to genomewide fork stalling followed by chromosome breakage. Breaks do not result from stochastic collapse of stalled forks or other incidental lesions; instead, they occur in specific regions of the genome during a G2 chromosomal transition. Break regions are found to be genetically encoded replication slow zones (RSZs), a newly discovered yeast chromosomal determinant. Thus, Mec1 has important functions in normal S phase and the genome instability of mec1 (and, analogously, ATR-/-) mutants stems from defects in these basic roles.

Chromosome Breakage↗

Uracil recognition by archaeal family B DNA polymerases.

Archaeal family-B DNA polymerases possess a novel uracil-sensing mechanism. A specialized pocket scans the template, ahead of the replication fork, for the presence of uracil; on encountering this base, DNA synthesis is stalled. The structural basis for uracil recognition by polymerases is described and compared with other uracil-recognizing enzymes (uridine-triphosphate pyrophophatases and uracil-DNA glycosylases). Remarkably, protein-protein interactions between all three archaeal uracil sensors are observed; possibly the enzymes co-operate to efficiently eliminate uracil from archaeal genomes.

Archaea↗

Bacteriophage phi29 DNA replication arrest caused by codirectional collisions with the transcription machinery.

The consequences on replication of collisions between phi29 DNA polymerase, a monomeric replicase endowed with strand displacement capacity, and the transcription machinery have been studied in vitro. Codirectional collisions with stalled transcription ternary complexes at four different promoters in the phi29 genome were found to block replication fork progression. Upon collision, the DNA polymerase remained on the template and was able to resume elongation once the RNA polymerase was allowed to move. Collisions with RNA polymerase molecules moving in the same direction also interfered with replication, causing a decrease in the replication rate. These results lead to the proposal that in bacteriophage phi29 a transcription complex physically blocks the progression of a replication fork. We suggest that temporal regulation of transcription and the low probability that the replication and transcription processes colocalize in vivo contribute to achieving minimal interference between the two events.

Bacillus Phages↗

The Tof1p-Csm3p protein complex counteracts the Rrm3p helicase to control replication termination of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Termination of replication forks at the natural termini of the rDNA of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is controlled in a sequence-specific and polar mode by the interaction of the Fob1p replication terminator protein with the tandem Ter sites located in the nontranscribed spacers. Here we show, by both 2D gel analyses and chromatin immunoprecipitations (ChIP), that there exists a second level of global control mediated by the intra-S-phase checkpoint protein complex of Tof1p and Csm3p that protect stalled forks at Ter sites against the activity of the Rrm3p helicase ("sweepase"). The sweepase tends to release arrested forks presumably by the transient displacement of the Ter-bound Fob1p. Consistent with this mechanism, very few replication forks were arrested at the natural replication termini in the absence of the two checkpoint proteins. In the absence of the Rrm3p helicase, there was a slight enhancement of fork arrest at the Ter sites. Simultaneous deletions of the TOF1 (or CSM3), and the RRM3 genes restored fork arrest by removing both the fork-releasing and fork-protection activities. Other genes such as MRC1, WSS1, and PSY2 that are also involved in the MRC1 checkpoint pathway were not involved in this global control. This observation suggests that Tof1p-Csm3p function differently from MRC1 and the other above-mentioned genes. This mechanism is not restricted to the natural Ter sites but was also observed at fork arrest caused by the meeting of a replication fork with transcription approaching from the opposite direction.

Autoradiography↗