Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Vaginal Barrier Methods”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 451 records · Page 25Linked to original sources
PubMed1992

Vulvovaginitis: promotion of condom use to prevent sexually transmitted disease.

Many studies have suggested that merely warning people about the dangers of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) and urging the use of condoms as protection will not result in widespread use of condoms. Regular condom use appears to be grounded in knowledge of its effectiveness, perception of STD risk, and belief in a partner's acceptance. But these are not the only barriers to condom use. Negotiating condom use often comes at a sensitive stage in intimate relationships, when individuals prefer to avoid such discussions and simply to trust the powerful and compelling feelings of mutual attraction. This review will consider (1) the effectiveness of condoms in preventing STD transmission, (2) barriers to the use of condoms, and (3) recommended strategies to promote acceptance and use of condoms by heterosexual women.

Condoms↗
PubMed1980

Contraception in the adolescent: current concepts for the pediatrician.

An overview is presented of the major methods of contraception available to the sexually active adolescent. Emphasis is given to the combined birth control pill, while the literature describing absolute and relative contraindications to oral contraception is reviewed. It is noted that adolescents with chronic illness must also be evaluated for contraceptive needs. Other methods covered include the intrauterine device, barrier methods (diaphragm, condom, and vaginal contraceptives), injectable contraceptives, postcoital contraception, and methods under current investigation. The approach to each patient must be individualized, based on her coital activity, understanding of alternatives, medical status, and what method is chosen.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[A possibility for verifying condom use in sex offenses].

In order to elucidate the circumstances of sexual crimes, the forensic laboratory is increasingly forced to consider whether the offender has used a condom. The detection presented here depends on Lycopodium spores used in several condom coatings. They can easily be detected e.g. in vaginal swabs. A screening of 40 various condoms available in Germany revealed that 32 (= 80%) were coated with Lycopodium spores. The microscopical investigation of the spores is explained and some sources of error in interpretation are discussed.

Condoms↗
PubMed1986

Longevity of Gynol II and Ortho Creme in the Prentif cervical cap.

A review of the literature yielded no scientific basis for current recommendations on the length of time spermicide-filled cervical caps can be worn while continuing to protect against pregnancy. Ten cervical cap users provided 99 samples of cap contents after a variety of insertion periods using Gynol II, Ortho Creme and vehicle controls. Testing for spermicidal effect was performed in the laboratory using quality semen from two donors and employing the Multiple Exposure Photography system of semen analysis. Criteria for determining spermicide effectiveness were developed. Results suggest that 3 to 4 days is the reasonable limit for cap use with Gynol II and 5 days with Ortho Creme, contrasted with 1 day limits for Gynol II and 2 day limits for Ortho Creme using existing criteria. Limited experience with samples exposed to semen in vivo suggest that spermicidal potency is not lost through repeated intercourse. Recommendations for validating these limits with clinical studies are made.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

Barrier versus oral contraceptive use: a study of female college students.

Although they provide birth control and are easier to use, oral contraceptives (OCPs) are not the preferred approach to preventing sexually transmitted disease (STD). Do the knowledge, attitudes, and experiences of oral contraceptive users place them at greater risk for STDs than those who employ barrier methods? This study examined differences between sexually active female college students (ie, those who reported ever having had vaginal intercourse) who used OCPs and those who employed barrier methods of contraception at the time of their most recent intercourse. The authors analyzed HIV- and other STD-related knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors from three consecutive annual health surveys of young women about to begin their first year of college. Findings showed barrier and OCP users to be comparable in knowledge about the effectiveness of various contraceptive methods in protecting them against STDs, perceived personal susceptibility to HIV, and experiences with alcohol before sexual intercourse. Oral contraceptive users, compared with those in the group who used barrier methods, reported a greater number of recent partners (p less than .03) and greater perceived vulnerability to STDs (p less than .03). Student healthcare providers must develop creative educational strategies to encourage simultaneous use of both oral contraceptives and barrier methods to protect students against STDs and pregnancy.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1989

The vaginal contraceptive diaphragm and the condom--a reevaluation and comparison of two barrier methods with the rhythm method.

The use-effectiveness and continuation rates of two barrier methods of contraception, the diaphragm and condom, were studied during a two-year follow-up in a group of 85 and 98 women, respectively. All were highly motivated. Results were compared to a group of 64 women using the periodic abstinence or rhythm method, i.e. not using any contraceptive. The patients selected the method of contraception they preferred and were instructed in their proper use. Results showed good continuation rates in the groups using a diaphragm and the condom for 2 years, for a total follow-up of 5570 cycles. Pregnancy rate after 24 months of use, as calculated by Pearl's formula, was 2.48 for the diaphragm, 3.21 for the condom, and 5.19 in the rhythm group. No serious side effects or complications occurred in either group. The study demonstrated a fair acceptability and use-effectiveness for barrier contraceptive. We suggest that these harmless and complication-free methods may still be reasonable alternatives for the "modern" methods, the pill and the IUD.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1992

Barrier contraceptives and sexually transmitted diseases in women: a comparison of female-dependent methods and condoms.

INTRODUCTION: Most efforts at sexually transmitted disease (STD) protection center on condom use, but little is known about how condoms compare with other barrier methods, particularly those controlled by women. METHODS: To evaluate the effect of different barrier contraceptives on the prevalence of STDs and other vaginal infections, we retrospectively studied 5681 visits by women to an urban STD clinic. RESULTS: As compared with women using no contraceptive or with tubal ligations, women using the contraceptive sponge or diaphragm had at least 65% lower rates of infection with Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Trichomonas vaginalis, while condom users had 34% and 30% lower rates, respectively. For Chlamydia trachomatis, the reduction was 13% among sponge users, 72% among diaphragm users, and 3% among condom users, although these differences were not significant. When compared with women using condoms, women using female-dependent methods (sponge or diaphragm) had significantly lower rates of both gonorrhea and trichomoniasis. Vaginal candidiasis was more common among women using diaphragms but not other barrier methods, while rates of bacterial vaginosis were similar among all groups. CONCLUSIONS: Women using the contraceptive sponge or diaphragm experience protection from STDs to a greater extent than those relying on condoms. Female-dependent barrier contraceptives should receive more attention in STD risk-reduction programs.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Nonoxynol-9 vaginal pessary: a preliminary Indian experience.

BACKGROUND: Barrier methods of contraception do not have systemic effects and allow the user complete control over their use. For women, the ease of use of a contraceptive is often more important than its efficacy. Hence, barrier methods could be offered as a useful alternative method of contraception. Nonoxynol-9 (a spermicide) is a locally acting, non-hormonal method free from systemic side-efforts. It is a woman-controlled, reversible method which is to be used before intercourse. There are little data available on its efficacy, side-effects and acceptability among Indian women. METHODS: The vaginal pessary nonoxynol-9 was offered as a contraceptive option to 3200 women attending the Family Planning clinics at 31 Human Reproduction Research Centres (HRRCs) of the Indian Council of Medical Research. The other contraceptives offered included an intrauterine device, oral pills, condoms, Norplant, tubal sterilization and vasectomy using the cafeteria approach. Those who accepted nonoxynol-9 were followed up to assess the rates of continuation, failure and side-effects. RESULTS: The nonoxynol-9 pessary was accepted by 541 women who were followed up for 3470 woman-months of use. The reasons given for acceptance were that it was user-controlled and/or they did not wish to use other methods because of the side-effects or contraindications of these methods. The overall continuation rates were 41.2% and 33% at 9 and 12 months of use, respectively. Most women (31.3%) discontinued its use due to personal reasons such as husband dissatisfaction, desire for further pregnancy, irregular use of pessary and difficulty in insertion. Twenty-nine women became pregnant during the study period (15 due to method failure and 14 due to user failure) giving a use-effectiveness of 8.8% at 12 months. The method failure rate was 4.3% at 12 months of use. The failure rates were lower compared with the reported failure rates of barrier contraceptives (1%-30% at 1 year of use) and the side-effects were minimal. CONCLUSION: Nonoxynol-9 had low acceptability (16.9%) and overall continuation rates--41.2% and 33% at 9 and 12 months of use. It could be offered to women looking for a short term, user-controlled contraceptive.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1976

Thrombosis-perspective on a major side effect of oral contraceptives.

Evidence from retrospective studies suggests that the risk of thrombosis is related to the dose of oestrogen in oral contraceptives. Postoperative thrombosis is four times more likely to occur if oral contraceptives containing oestrogen are used before a major surgical procedure. Older women who smoke are at greater risk, especially when the surgery is performed during the winter months. It is recommended that barrier methods of contraception (condom or vaginal diaphragm) be employed during the six weeks before an elective major surgical procedure or that a progestogen-only pill be used in place of a combined or sequential oral contraceptive for this period of time.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

Acceptability of the vaginal sheath (Femshield) in Thai couples.

A small survey to assess the perception and experience of current family planning users and their husbands was carried out in a university family planning clinic. Women routinely visiting the clinic were asked to complete a short Screening Form. Fifty-six women responded to the questionnaire concerning their attitude to the Femshield. Eighteen volunteers agreed to enter the study and were given verbal instruction on use of the device. Each volunteer was provided with 3-5 Femshields. Participants were asked to return to the clinic one month after admission. A Husband Form was then sent to the home of the volunteers to assess the attitude of their husbands. Thirteen volunteers returned for the follow-up visit. Fifty Femshields were used. The results showed that the volunteers found the vaginal insertion of the device was acceptable, but the outer and inner rings of the device caused an uncomfortable feeling when having intercourse. The volunteers were more positive to the device than their spouses. The sexual satisfaction of both partners was reduced. A few couples suggested that the device be modified with the bag being smaller and thinner, the outer and inner rings reduced in size and softer, and the device itself being in a prelubricated packet.

Consumer Behavior↗
PubMed1990

The effect of condom use on cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade I (CIN I).

A prospective, controlled study of condom use in patients with histologically-proven CIN I was undertaken. Forty-six patients were studied, 22 by random allocation and 24 by nonrandom allocation to either condom use or non-condom use for 6 months. At the end of this time, patients were reassessed cytologically, colposcopically and histologically. There was no significant difference between the groups with respect to outcome. Six patients' lesions (13%) progressed in this period, 5 (11%) to CIN III. Condom usage is not an effective treatment for CIN I.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Lea's Shield contraceptive device: pilot study of its short-term patient acceptability and aspects of use.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the short term patient acceptability and aspects of use of the Lea's Shield(R). DESIGN: Observational study. Ten women were each invited to use the Lea's Shield on 10 occasions and to report their observations and experiences on structured questionnaires after each use. Thus, data on a maximum of 100 uses would become available for analysis. Answers were recorded on numerical scales and in descriptive terms. On conclusion of their study participation, patients and their partners were required to document their overall experience with the product. SETTING AND SUBJECTS: Women aged 18 to 40 years, self-selected from clients attending the Margaret Pyke Family Planning Centre. They had to be in a stable monogamous relationship, gynaecologically healthy, and willing to continue their use of oral contraceptives, IUD, or injectable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Ability to use the method without formal teaching, assessed after vaginal examination by the investigator at end of first visit. User satisfaction, as expressed in structured questionnaires and by premature withdrawal from trial. RESULTS: Ten women used Lea's Shield on a total of 70 occasions, of which 46(66 per cent) were associated with sexual intercourse. Five subjects withdrew from the trial prematurely on account of discomfort to either or both partners (four), and recurrent cystitis (one). At the enrolment visit, all but one woman inserted the device correctly without formal teaching, but there was considerable inter-patient variation in their responses concerning ease of insertion/removal, and comfort during subsequent uses. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary observations suggest that the Lea's Shield may be acceptable to a highly select minority of women. However, much more research is required to permit a reliable assessment of its acceptability to the wider public. The product's potential for causing pain and discomfort also needs further exploration.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Female condom use among women at high risk of sexually transmitted disease.

CONTEXT: Whereas the female condom has been evaluated in many hypothetical acceptability or short-term use studies, there is little information about its suitability for the prevention of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) or HIV over extended periods of time. METHODOLOGY: As part of a six-month prospective follow-up study of 1,159 STD clinic patients, clients were interviewed during their initial visit, exposed to a behavioral intervention promoting condoms, given a physical examination and provided with instructions on completing a sexual diary. Potential predictors of trying the female condom were evaluated using logistic regression, and three condom-use groups (exclusive users of female condoms, exclusive users of male condoms and users of both types of condoms) were compared using multinomial regression. RESULTS: Among 895 women who reported having engaged in vaginal intercourse during the study period, one-half had sex with only one partner, while one-quarter each had two partners or three or more partners. A total of 731 women reported using the female condom at least once during the follow-up period--85% during the first month of follow-up. Multiple logistic regression analyses indicated that employed women and those with a regular sexual partner at baseline were significantly more likely to try the female condom. By the end of the follow-up period, 8% of participants had used the female condom exclusively, 15% had used the male condom exclusively, 73% had used both types of condom and 3% had used no condoms. Twenty percent of women who tried the female condom used it only once and 13% used it twice, while 20% used 5-9 female condoms and 32% used 10 or more. Consistent condom users (N=309) were predominantly users of both types of condom (75%), and were less often exclusive users of the male condom (18%) or the female condom (7%). According to a multivariate analysis, women who used the female condom exclusively or who mixed condom types were more likely to be black, were more likely to be employed and were more likely to have a regular partner than were users of the male condom. CONCLUSIONS: Women at risk of STDs find the female condom acceptable and will try it, and some use it consistently. Mixing use of female condoms and male condoms may facilitate consistent condom use. The female condom may improve an individual's options for risk reduction and help reduce the spread of STDs.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1989

Characteristics of reproductive life and risk of breast cancer in a case-control study of young nulliparous women.

Between 1982 and 1985, a case-control study of nulliparous women, aged 25-45, was conducted to analyse the relationships between the risk of breast cancer and causes of nulliparity, including contraceptive methods. Fifty-one cases of breast cancer diagnosed less than 3 months before interview were matched with 95 controls on age at diagnosis, year of interview, and medical center. The causes of nulliparity related to female sterility or subfertility (mechanical or hormonal disorders) were not found to be associated with a significantly higher risk of breast cancer. The causes related to fertilization failure, i.e. no sexual partner, rare sexual intercourse (less than once per month), or partner with abnormal semen, were found to lead to an increased risk. Detailed analysis of contraceptive methods showed that the risk of breast cancer increased (p = 0.02) with a longer duration of use of barrier methods (withdrawal or condom). Conversely, the risk significantly decreased (p = 0.004) with a longer duration of use of non-barrier methods (oral contraceptives, IUD, cap, local spermicides, vaginal douche, safe period, or no method), i.e. methods allowing a direct exposure to human semen.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Sex preparation and diaphragm acceptability in sex work in Nairobi, Kenya.

BACKGROUND: Women in sex work stand to benefit if the contraceptive diaphragm alone or combined with a microbicide proves to be an effective barrier method against HIV and sexually transmissible infection (STI). Currently, contraceptive diaphragm users are advised to leave the diaphragm in situ without concomitant use of other intravaginal substances for at least 6 h after intercourse. METHODS: We conducted in-depth interviews on sexual behaviour including post-coital intravaginal practices with 36 women in sex work and 26 of their clients and held two focus-group discussions, each with 10 women. RESULTS: The women described adapting several potentially harmful substances, such as cloth and soapy water, for post-coital vaginal use to ensure personal hygiene, disease prevention and client pleasure. Some wanted to clean themselves and remove the diaphragm early, fearing exposure to HIV infection for themselves and their subsequent clients. Clients indicated their desire for 'dry sex', vaginal cleanliness and reduced risk of infection through vaginal cleaning. CONCLUSIONS: The diaphragm as a female-controlled barrier method for HIV/STI prevention may have limited acceptability among women in sex work if its effectiveness depends on a 6-h post-coital wait before removal, along with avoidance of concomitant use of intravaginal substances. In keeping with the beliefs of the the female sex workers and their needs and practices, alternative intravaginal substances and modes of insertion that will not disrupt vaginal flora, injure vaginal epithelium, damage the diaphragm or counteract potentially beneficial effects of microbicides are needed. The possibility of removing the diaphragm sooner than the recommended 6 h for contraception should be further studied.

Adolescent↗