Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Notch”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 451 records · Page 25Linked to original sources

Notch activity is downregulated just prior to retinal ganglion cell differentiation.

The Notch signaling pathway is important at several stages of retinal development including the differentiation of retinal ganglion cells and Muller glia. The downstream effectors of Notch signaling, Hes1 and Hes5, have been shown to be critical in the retina as well. While Notch activity directly regulates Hes1 and Hes5 elsewhere in the nervous system, it has been unclear whether Hes1 and/or Hes5 are directly regulated by Notch activity in the developing retina. Here, we report that both Hes1 and Hes5 are directly regulated by Notch activity during retinal development. Using fluorescence-based Hes1 and Hes5 reporter constructs, we can monitor Notch activity in progenitor cells in the intact retina, and we find that Notch activity is downregulated just prior to retinal ganglion cell differentiation.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Regulation of osteoclast development by Notch signaling directed to osteoclast precursors and through stromal cells.

Osteoclasts are derived from hematopoietic precursor cells belonging to the monocyte/macrophage lineage. Osteoclast development has been reported to be regulated by several molecules such as macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF), receptor activator of nuclear factor (NF)-kappaB ligand (RANKL), and a decoy receptor of RANKL, osteoprotegerin (OPG). Recently, it was demonstrated that the Notch signaling pathway regulates myeloid differentiation and antagonizes cell fate determination, however, the effect of Notch signaling on the osteoclast lineage has not been reported. In this study, we examined the effect of signaling via Notch receptors on the differentiation into osteoclasts by using cells from the bone marrow, spleen, and peritoneal cavity, and a cloned macrophagelike cell line. Osteoclastogenesis was inhibited by an immobilized Notch ligand, Delta-1. The dish-adherent bone marrow cells precultured with M-CSF expressed both Mac-1 and M-CSF receptors, c-Fms; osteoclastogenesis of these cells was efficiently inhibited. The immobilized Delta-1 also down-regulated the surface c-Fms expression, while the c-Fms gene expression was not changed. Genes for Notch receptors and Notch ligands are expressed in not only hematopoietic cells but also stromal cells that support osteoclast development. Constitutively active Notch1-transfected stromal cells showed increased expression of RANKL and OPG genes, and strong inhibition of M-CSF gene expression, resulting in reduction of their ability to support osteoclast development. Taken together, these findings indicate that Notch signaling affects both osteoclast precursors and stromal cells and thereby negatively regulates osteoclastogenesis.

Animals↗

Jagged1-induced Notch signaling drives proliferation of multiple myeloma cells.

Notch receptors expressed on hematopoietic stem cells interact with their ligands on bone marrow stromal cells and thereby control cell fate decisions and survival. We recently demonstrated that Notch signaling is involved in proliferation and survival of B cell-derived tumor cells of classic Hodgkin disease and described a novel mechanism for the oncogenic capacity of Notch. In this study we investigated whether Notch signaling is involved in the tight interactions between neoplastic plasma cells and their bone marrow microenvironment, which are essential for tumor cell growth in multiple myeloma (MM). Here we demonstrate that Notch receptors and their ligand Jagged1 are highly expressed in cultured and primary MM cells, whereas nonneoplastic counterparts show low to undetectable levels of Notch. Functional data indicate that ligand-induced Notch signaling is a growth factor for MM cells and suggest that these interactions contribute to myelomagenesis in vivo.

B-Lymphocytes↗

Echinoid mutants exhibit neurogenic phenotypes and show synergistic interactions with the Notch signaling pathway.

During neurogenesis in Drosophila, groups of ectodermal cells are endowed with the capacity to become neuronal precursors. The Notch signaling pathway is required to limit the neuronal potential to a single cell within each group. Loss of genes of the Notch signaling pathway results in a neurogenic phenotype: hyperplasia of the nervous system accompanied by a parallel loss of epidermis. Echinoid (Ed), a cell membrane associated Immunoglobulin C2-type protein, has previously been shown to be a negative regulator of the EGFR pathway during eye and wing vein development. Using in situ hybridization and antibody staining of whole-mount embryos, we show that Ed has a dynamic expression pattern during embryogenesis. Embryonic lethal alleles of ed reveal a role of Ed in restricting neurogenic potential during embryonic neurogenesis, and result in a phenotype similar to that of loss-of-function mutations of Notch signaling pathway genes. In this process Ed interacts closely with the Notch signaling pathway. Loss of ed suppresses the loss of neuronal elements caused by ectopic activation of the Notch signaling pathway. Using a temperature-sensitive allele of ed we show, furthermore, that Ed is required to suppress sensory bristles and for proper wing vein specification during adult development. In these processes also, ed acts in close concert with genes of the Notch signaling pathway. Thus the extra wing vein phenotype of ed is enhanced upon reduction of Delta (Dl) or Enhancer of split [E(spl)] proteins. Overexpression of the membrane-tethered extracellular region of Ed results in a dominant-negative phenotype. This phenotype is suppressed by overexpression of E(spl)m7 and enhanced by overexpression of Dl. Our work establishes a role of Ed during embryonic nervous system development, as well as adult sensory bristle specification and shows that Ed interacts synergistically with the Notch signaling pathway.

Animals↗

Epsin potentiates Notch pathway activity in Drosophila and C. elegans.

Endocytosis and trafficking within the endocytosis pathway are known to modulate the activity of different signaling pathways. Epsins promote endocytosis and are postulated to target specific proteins for regulated endocytosis. Here, we present a functional link between the Notch pathway and epsins. We identify the Drosophila ortholog of epsin, liquid facets (lqf), as an inhibitor of cardioblast development in a genetic screen for mutants that affect heart development. We find that lqf inhibits cardioblast development and promotes the development of fusion-competent myoblasts, suggesting a model in which lqf acts on or in fusion-competent myoblasts to prevent their acquisition of the cardioblast fate. lqf and Notch exhibit essentially identical heart phenotypes, and lqf genetically interacts with the Notch pathway during multiple Notch-dependent events in Drosophila. We extended the link between the Notch pathway and epsin function to C. elegans, where the C. elegans lqf ortholog acts in the signaling cell to promote the glp-1/Notch pathway activity during germline development. Our results suggest that epsins play a specific, evolutionarily conserved role to promote Notch signaling during animal development and support the idea that they do so by targeting ligands of the Notch pathway for endocytosis.

Adaptor Proteins, Vesicular Transport↗

Delta-Notch signalling controls commitment to a secretory fate in the zebrafish intestine.

The transparency of the juvenile zebrafish and its genetic advantages make it an attractive model for study of cell turnover in the gut. BrdU labelling shows that the gut epithelium is renewed in essentially the same way as in mammals: the villi are lined with non-dividing differentiated cells, while cell division is confined to the intervillus pockets. New cells produced in the pockets take about 4 days to migrate out to the tips of the villi, where they die. We have generated monoclonal antibodies to identify the absorptive and secretory cells in the epithelium, and we have used these antibodies to examine the part that Delta-Notch signalling plays in producing the diversity of intestinal cell types. Several Notch receptors and ligands are expressed in the gut. In particular, the Notch ligand DeltaD (Delta1 in the mouse) is expressed in cells of the secretory lineage. In an aei mutant, where DeltaD is defective, secretory cells are overproduced. In mind bomb (mib), where all Delta-Notch signalling is believed to be blocked, almost all the cells in the 3-day gut epithelium adopt a secretory character. Thus, secretory differentiation appears to be the default in the absence of Notch activation, and lateral inhibition mediated by Delta-Notch signalling is required to generate a balanced mixture of absorptive and secretory cells. These findings demonstrate the central role of Notch signalling in the gut stem-cell system and establish the zebrafish as a model for study of the mechanisms controlling renewal of gut epithelium.

Animals↗

Notch ligands with contrasting functions: Jagged1 and Delta1 in the mouse inner ear.

Each of the sensory patches in the epithelium of the inner ear is a mosaic of hair cells and supporting cells. Notch signalling is thought to govern this pattern of differentiation through lateral inhibition. Recent experiments in the chick suggest, however, that Notch signalling also has a prior function - inductive rather than inhibitory - in defining the prosensory patches from which the differentiated cells arise. Several Notch ligands are expressed in each patch, but their individual roles in relation to the two functions of Notch signalling are unclear. We have used a Cre-LoxP approach to knock out two of these ligands, Delta1 (Dll1) and Jagged1 (Jag1), in the mouse ear. In the absence of Dll1, auditory hair cells develop early and in excess, in agreement with the lateral inhibition hypothesis. In the absence of Jag1, by contrast, the total number of these cells is strongly reduced, with complete loss of cochlear outer hair cells and some groups of vestibular hair cells, indicating that Jag1 is required for the prosensory inductive function of Notch. The number of cochlear inner hair cells, however, is almost doubled. This correlates with loss of expression of the cell cycle inhibitor p27(Kip1) (Cdkn1b), suggesting that signalling by Jag1 is also needed to limit proliferation of prosensory cells, and that there is a core part of this population whose prosensory character is established independently of Jag1-Notch signalling. Our findings confirm that Notch signalling in the ear has distinct prosensory and lateral-inhibitory functions, for which different ligands are primarily responsible.

Animals↗

The Notch locus of Drosophila is required in epidermal cells for epidermal development.

The Notch locus of Drosophila plays an important role in cell fate decisions within the neurogenic ectoderm, a role thought to involve interactions at the cell surface. We have assayed the requirement for Notch gene expression in epidermal cells by two kinds of genetic mosaics. First, with gynandromorphs, we removed the wild-type gene long before the critical developmental events to produce large mutant clones. The genotype of cells in large clones was scored by means of an antibody to the Notch protein. Second, using mitotic recombination, we removed the gene at successively later times after completion of the mitotically active early cleavage stages, to produce small clones. These clones were detected by means of a linked mutation of cuticle pattern, armadillo. The results of both experiments demonstrate a requirement for Notch expression by epidermal cells, and thus argue against the model that the Notch product acts as a signal required only in the neuroblast to influence neighboring epidermal cells. The mitotic recombination experiment revealed that Notch product is required by epidermal cells subsequent to neuroblast delamination. This result implies that the Notch gene functions to maintain the determined state of epidermal cells, possibly by mediating cell surface interactions within the epidermis.

Animals↗

The involvement of the Notch locus in Drosophila oogenesis.

The Notch gene in Drosophila encodes a transmembrane protein with homology to EGF that, in a variety of tissues, appears to mediate cell interactions necessary for cell fate choices. Here we demonstrate that oogenesis and spermatogenesis depend on Notch. We examine the phenotypes of the temperature-sensitive Notch allele, Nts1, and, using a monoclonal antibody, determine the cellular and subcellular distribution of Notch protein during oogenesis. We show that Nts1 is associated with a missense mutation in the extracellular, EGF homologous region of Notch and that at non-permissive temperatures oogenesis is blocked and the subcellular distribution of the protein is altered. In wild-type ovaries, Notch protein is found on the apical surface of somatically derived follicle cells, while in the germline-derived cells the protein is not polarized. These findings are discussed in view of the hypothesis that Notch acts as a multifunctional receptor to mediate developmentally important cell interactions.

Animals↗

Vertebrate retinal ganglion cells are selected from competent progenitors by the action of Notch.

The first cells generated during development of the vertebrate retina are the ganglion cells, the projection neurons of the retina. Although they are one of the most intensively studied cell types within the central nervous system, little is known of the mechanisms that determine ganglion cell fate. We demonstrate that ganglion cells are selected from a large group of competent progenitors that comprise the majority of the early embryonic retina and that differentiation within this group is regulated by Notch. Notch activity in vivo was diminished using antisense oligonucleotides or augmented using a retrovirally transduced constitutively active allele of Notch. The number of ganglion cells produced was inversely related to the level of Notch activity. In addition, the Notch ligand Delta inhibited retinal progenitors from differentiating as ganglion cells to the same degree as did activated Notch in an in vitro assay. These results suggest a conserved strategy for neurogenesis in the retina and describe a versatile in vitro and in vivo system with which to examine the action of the Notch pathway in a specific cell fate decision in a vertebrate.

Alleles↗

Genes of the Enhancer of split and achaete-scute complexes are required for a regulatory loop between Notch and Delta during lateral signalling in Drosophila.

Like the neuroblasts of the central nervous system, sensory organ precursors of the peripheral nervous system of the Drosophila thorax arise as single spaced cells. However, groups of cells initially have neural potential as visualized by the expression of the proneural genes achaete and scute. A class of genes, known as the 'neurogenic genes', function to restrict the proportion of cells that differentiate as sensory organ precursors. They mediate cell communication between the competent cells by means of an inhibitory signal, Delta, that is transduced through the Notch receptor and results in a cessation of achaete-scute activity. Here we show that mutation of either the bHLH-encoding genes of the Enhancer of split complex (E(spl)-C) or groucho, like Notch or Delta mutants, cause an overproduction of sensory organ precursors at the expense of epidermis. The mutant cells behave antonomously suggesting that the corresponding gene products are required for reception of the inhibitory signal. Epistasis experiments place both E(spl)-C bHLH-encoding genes and groucho downstream of Notch and upstream of achaete and scute, consistent with the idea that they are part of the Notch signalling cascade. Since all competent cells produce both the receptor and its ligand, it was postulated that Notch and Delta are linked within each cell by a feedback loop. We show, that, like mutant Notch cells, cells mutant for E(spl)-C bHLH-encoding genes or groucho inhibit neighbouring wild-type cells causing them to adopt the epidermal fate. This inhibition requires the genes of the achaete-scute complex (AS-C) which must therefore regulate the signal Delta. Thus there is a regulatory loop between Notch and Delta that is under the transcriptional control of the E(spl)-C and AS-C genes.

Animals↗

Expression of constitutively active Notch arrests follicle cells at a precursor stage during Drosophila oogenesis and disrupts the anterior-posterior axis of the oocyte.

During early development, there are numerous instances where a bipotent progenitor divides to give rise to two progeny cells with different fates. The Notch gene of Drosophila and its homologues in other metazoans have been implicated in many of these cell fate decisions. It has been argued that the role of Notch in such instances may be to maintain cells in a precursor state susceptible to specific differentiating signals. This has been difficult to prove, however, due to a lack of definitive markers for precursor identity. We here perform molecular and morphological analyses of the roles of Notch in ovarian follicle cells during Drosophila oogenesis. These studies show directly that constitutively active Notch arrests cells at a precursor stage, while the loss of Notch function eliminates this stage. Expression of moderate levels of activated Notch leads to partial transformation of cell fates, as found in other systems, and we show that this milder phenotype correlates with a prolonged, but still transient, precursor stage. We also find that expression of constitutively active Notch in follicle cells at later stages leads to a defect in the anterior-posterior axis of the oocyte.

Animals↗

The intracellular deletions of Delta and Serrate define dominant negative forms of the Drosophila Notch ligands.

We examined the function of the intracellular domains of the two known Drosophila Notch ligands, Delta and Serrate, by expressing wild-type and mutant forms in the developing Drosophila eye under the sevenless promoter. The expression of intracellularly truncated forms of either Delta (sev-DlTM) or Serrate (sev-SerTM) leads to extra photoreceptor phenotypes, similar to the eye phenotypes associated with loss-of-function mutations of either Notch or Delta. Consistent with the notion that the truncated ligands reduce. Notch signalling activity, the eye phenotypes of sev-DlTM and sev-SerTM are enhanced by loss-of-function mutations in the Notch pathway elements, Notch, Delta, mastermind, deltex and groucho, but are suppressed by a duplication of Delta or mutations in Hairless, a negative regulator of the pathway. These observations were extended to the molecular level by demonstrating that the expression of Enhancer of split m delta, a target of Notch signalling, is down-regulated by the truncated ligands highly expressed in neighbouring cells. We conclude that the truncated ligands act as antagonists of Notch signalling.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Transcriptional regulation of Notch and Delta: requirement for neuroblast segregation in Drosophila.

Segregation of a single neural precursor from each proneural cluster in Drosophila relies on Notch-mediated lateral signalling. Studies concerning the spacing of precursors for the microchaetes of the peripheral nervous system suggested the existence of a regulatory loop between Notch and its ligand Delta within each cell that is under transcriptional control. Activation of Notch leads to repression of the achaete-scute genes which themselves regulate transcription of Delta, perhaps directly. Here we have tested a requirement for transcriptional regulation of Notch and/or Delta during neuroblast segregation in embryos, by providing Notch and Delta ubiquitously at uniform levels. Neuroblast segregation occurs normally under conditions of uniform Notch expression. Under conditions of uniform Delta expression, a single neuroblast segregates from each proneural group in 80% of the cases, more than one in the remaining 20%. Thus transcriptional regulation of Delta is largely dispensable. We discuss the possibility that segregation of single precursors in the central nervous system may rely on a heterogeneous distribution of neural potential between different cells of the proneural group. Notch signalling would enable all cells to mutually repress each other and only a cell with an elevated neural potential could overcome this repression.

Animals↗

Structural requirements for notch signalling with delta and serrate during the development and patterning of the wing disc of Drosophila.

The delta and Serrate proteins interact with the extracellular domain of the Notch receptor and initiate signalling through the receptor. The two ligands are very similar in structure and have been shown to be interchangeable experimentally; however, loss of function analysis indicates that they have different functions during development and analysis of their signalling during wing development indicates that the Fringe protein can discriminate between the two ligands. This raises the possibility that the signalling of delta and Serrate through Notch requires different domains of the Notch protein. Here we have tested this possibility by examining the ability of delta and Serrate to interact and signal with Notch molecules in which different domains had been deleted. This analysis has shown that EGF-like repeats 11 and 12, the RAM-23 and cdc10/ankyrin repeats and the region C-terminal to the cdc10/ankyrin repeats of Notch are necessary for both delta and Serrate to signal via Notch. They also indicate, however, that delta and Serrate utilise EGF-like repeats 24-26 of Notch for signalling, but there are significant differences in the way they utilise these repeats.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Antagonism of notch signaling activity by members of a novel protein family encoded by the bearded and enhancer of split gene complexes.

Cell-cell signaling through the Notch receptor is a principal mechanism underlying cell fate specification in a variety of developmental processes in metazoans, such as neurogenesis. In this report we describe our investigation of seven members of a novel gene family in Drosophila with important connections to Notch signaling. These genes all encode small proteins containing predicted basic amphipathic (&agr;)-helical domains in their amino-terminal regions, as described originally for Bearded; accordingly, we refer to them as Bearded family genes. Five members of the Bearded family are located in a newly discovered gene complex, the Bearded Complex; two others reside in the previously identified Enhancer of split Complex. All members of this family contain, in their proximal upstream regions, at least one high-affinity binding site for the Notch-activated transcription factor Suppressor of Hairless, suggesting that all are directly regulated by the Notch pathway. Consistent with this, we show that Bearded family genes are expressed in a variety of territories in imaginal tissue that correspond to sites of active Notch signaling. We demonstrate that overexpression of any family member antagonizes the activity of the Notch pathway in multiple cell fate decisions during adult sensory organ development. These results suggest that Bearded family genes encode a novel class of effectors or modulators of Notch signaling.

3' Untranslated Regions↗

Notch signaling controls hepatoblast differentiation by altering the expression of liver-enriched transcription factors.

Hepatoblasts give rise to both mature hepatocytes and cholangiocytes. While Notch signaling has been implicated in the formation of bile ducts composed of cholangiocytes, little is known about the mechanism of lineage commitment of hepatoblasts. Here we describe the role of the Notch pathway in hepatoblast differentiation. Immunohistochemical analysis showed that Jagged1 was expressed in the cells surrounding the portal veins and Notch2 was expressed in most hepatic cells at mid gestation when ductal plates are formed surrounding the portal veins. Interestingly, the Jagged1+ cells were adjacent to ductal plates, suggesting that the Notch signaling is activated in hepatoblasts that undergo differentiation into cholangiocytes. In fact, expression of the Notch intracellular domain in Dlk+ hepatoblasts inhibited hepatic differentiation and significantly reduced the expression of albumin, a marker of both hepatoblasts and hepatocytes. Furthermore, the addition of Matrigel to the hepatoblast culture upregulated the expression of cytokeratin 7 and 19, integrin beta4, and HNF1beta, which are known to be expressed in cholangiocytes. By contrast, downregulation of the Notch signaling by siRNA specific for Notch2 mRNA as well as by the gamma-secretase inhibitor L-685,458 promoted the hepatic differentiation. Consistent with the previous finding that mature cholangiocytes strongly express HNF1beta, but barely express HNF1alpha, HNF4, and C/EBPalpha, activation of the Notch signaling upregulated HNF1beta expression, whereas it downregulated the expression of HNF1alpha, HNF4, and C/EBPalpha. These results suggest that the Notch signaling contributes to form a network of these transcription factors suitable for cholangiocyte differentiation.

Animals↗

Activin-like signaling activates Notch signaling during mesodermal induction.

Both activin-like signaling and Notch signaling play fundamental roles during early development. Activin-like signaling is involved in mesodermal induction and can induce a broad range of mesodermal genes and tissues from prospective ectodermal cells (animal caps). On the other hand, Notch signaling plays important roles when multipotent precursor cells achieve a specific cell fate. However, the relationship between these two signal pathways is not well understood. Here, we show that activin A induces Delta-1, Delta-2 and Notch expression and then activates Notch signaling in animal caps. Also, in vivo, ectopic activin-like signaling induced the ectopic expression of Delta-1 and Delta-2, whereas inhibition of activin-like signaling abolished the expression of Delta-1 and Delta-2. Furthermore, we show that MyoD, which is myogenic gene induced by activin A, can induce Delta-1 expression. However, MyoD had no effect on Notch expression, and inhibited Delta-2 expression. These results indicated that activin A induces Delta-1, Delta-2 and Notch by different cascades. We conclude that Notch signaling is activated when activin-like signaling induces various tissues from homogenous undifferentiated cells.

Activins↗