Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Lightning Injuries”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 451 records · Page 25Linked to original sources
PubMed1999

Lightning strikes at a mass gathering.

Among natural disasters, lightning is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality throughout the world. A well-informed bystander and an astute physician can make the difference between an outcome of death or lifelong disability versus complete or near-complete recovery. What is done in the first few minutes after such an event is the predominant predictor of success. This case report describes a young woman who was struck by lightning while talking on a cellular telephone at a mass gathering in an outdoor stadium. The discussion that follows the case centers on the pathophysiology of being struck by lightning and on issues unique to being struck in a stadium full of people.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Electrical injuries in Canadian burn care. Identification of unsolved problems.

Over the past decade, the Firefighters' Burn Treatment Unit of the University of Alberta Hospital in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, has treated 1399 inpatients suffering from thermal injury. Regional burn care is provided in a 10-bed intensive care unit with 18 plastic surgery reconstructive beds for a large referral region of central and northern Alberta, portions of the Northwest Territories, and neighboring provinces of British Columbia and Saskatchewan. Of the total burn inpatients during this period, 74 electrical injuries were treated (5.3% of all admissions): 71 were males (95.9%) and 3 females (4.1%). The mean age of all patients was 33.9 +/- 12.6 years (range 1-67). Compared to our general population of thermally injured patients, those with electrical injuries had smaller injuries [9.9 +/- 12.9% TBSA (range 1-65) versus 15.1 +/- 10.1], shorter length of hospitalization [18.6 +/- 7.3 days (range 1-80) versus 26.2 +/- 0.8], and substantially lower mortality once reaching the hospital (0% versus 4%). Electrical injuries were classified as flash in 30 cases, contact in 42 cases, and lightning in 2 cases; 74.3% of injuries occurred during work-related activities. A total of 118 operative procedures were performed during the acute admission (1.6 procedures per patient), including 19 amputations: 12 in the upper and 7 in the lower extremity. The mean time of amputation was 9.3 +/- 5.3 days after admission. In contact injuries of the upper extremity, 14 patients suffered amputations or neurologic injury that required reconstruction with free tissue transfers and nerve grafts. Long-term functional outcome of these patients using sensory testing, the Jebsen-Taylor hand function test, and wound coverage has revealed that these patients have substantial persistent sensory impairment of their upper extremities postinjury despite reconstruction, although many remain active and functional with acceptable wound coverage. Based on our analysis of electrical injury as it presents to one typical Canadian burn unit, our patients suffer limb loss on a delayed basis, which leads to substantial morbidity. Reconstruction of the upper extremity with microsurgical techniques after profound electrical injury has provided acceptable coverage, but in many instances is associated with poor or marginal sensory recovery limiting reemployment options for patients with upper extremity electrical burns. Further understanding of the cellular biology of delayed tissue loss after electric injury would offer the potential for reduction in amputation rate and improvement in functional outcome and overall morbidity.

Accidents, Occupational↗
PubMed2005

Lightning fatalities on the South African Highveld: a retrospective descriptive study for the period 1997 to 2000.

A review of the Southern Africa medical literature shows a paucity of published data regarding lightning fatalities. The South African Highveld has a lightning ground flash density of 6 to 9 flashes/km/year, with a high incidence of thunderstorm days per year (some 40-70). The Highveld has a largely urban population, many of whom have low socioeconomic status and poor education, housing, and other infrastructures and hence (possibly) are at greater exposure risk. Thirty-eight victims of lightning-related death were identified from the records of the 6 large medicolegal mortuaries on the South African Highveld, serving a population of approximately 7 million, for the period 1997 to 2000. Analysis of the records revealed that 95% of all victims were black, 79% were male, and the average age was 36 years. Lightning strikes occurred from September through to April (normal summer rainfall period), and the most strikes took place in the late afternoon (3:00 pm to 6:00 pm). All except 1 case occurred outdoors. In the autopsy reports, mention was made of singeing of hair in 68% of cases, and mention of damage to clothing was made in 26% of cases. Cutaneous thermal injuries were noted in 34 of the 38 cases, with apparent electrothermal injuries of the feet noted in 4 cases. Fifty-two percent of victims sustained some form of associated blunt-force injury (including abrasions, contusions, etc). Specific keraunopathologic injuries were described in only 2 of the cases. Twenty-one cases had some form of internal organ injury. This study serves to illustrate the relatively high incidence of lightning strikes in the region and calls for a more systematic and detailed investigative protocol in lightning-related deaths.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Overlooked diagnoses in chronic pain: analysis of survivors of electric shock and lightning strike.

OBJECTIVE: Patients who survive lightning strikes are rarely seen in clinical practice and patients with electrical injury are seen infrequently. This article reports the most commonly overlooked diagnoses so that physicians can improve their evaluations. METHODS: A total of 19 patients who survived a lightning strike and 53 patients who survived electrical shock had a partial or complete multidisciplinary evaluation at Mensana Clinic. A variety of diagnostic studies were ordered. RESULTS: In 19 lightning strike survivors, referring physicians did not mention 133 diagnoses, later established by Mensana Clinic. The overlooked diagnosis rate was 93%. In 53 patients who survived electrical shock, referring physicians did not mention 436 diagnoses, later established by Mensana Clinic. The overlooked diagnosis rate was 98.2%. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who survive electric shock and lightning strikes are often misdiagnosed because they are infrequently seen in a medical practice.

Academic Medical Centers↗