Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “LIPOPROTEINS”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 451 records · Page 25Linked to original sources
PubMed2002

[Heparin-induced extacorporeal low-density lipoprotein-lipoprotein alpha-fibrinogen precipitation in 36 cases].

OBJECTIVE: To observe the efficacy of heparin-induced extracorporeal low-density lipoprotein-lipoprotein alpha- fibrinogen precipitation (HELP) in clearing blood lipids. METHODS: Thirty-six patients were subjected to extracorporeal plasma lipid separation procedures that utilized heparin to induce the formation of the complex consisted of heparin, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), lipoprotein and fibrinogen which was precipitated and consequently separated from the plasma. Blood samples were obtained from the patients both before and after the procedures to assay serum total cholesterol (CH), triglyceride (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), LDL-C, apoliprotein A (ApoA) and apoliprotein B (ApoB). RESULT: Significant differences were observed between the pre- and postoperative levels of lipoprotein (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Plasma lipoprotein can be partly cleared by way of HELP.

Adult↗
PubMed1976

High density lipoprotein (HDL) polymorphisms in rabbit. I. A comparative study of rabbit and human serum high density lipoprotein.

Different classes of rabbit serum lipoprotein were prepared by ultracentrifugal flotation at densities 1-006, 1-063 and 1-21 g/ml. Agarose gel electrophoresis on rabbit whole serum and the serum fractions with different densities showed that this technique separates the different lipoprotein classes reasonably well. The electrophoretic mobility of the different lipoprotein classes of rabbit serum seems to be similar to that of the human lipoproteins, with the exception of alpha1-lipoprotein which had a greater mobility than human alpha1-lipoprotein. The chemical composition of rabbit high density lipoprotein (HDL)p was fairly similar to that of human HDL although the former seems to be richer in triglycerides. HDL was, after isolation by ultracentrifugal flotation at density 1-21, delipidated and submitted to gel filtration on Sephadex G-200 in 8 M urea. The major protein fraction of rabbit apo HDL corresponds in elution volume to that of the major fraction of human apo HDL, apoA-I. A protein fraction corresponding to human apoA-II does not seem to be present in rabbit HDL in demonstrable amounts. The rabbit protein fraction sometimes appearing in the area corresponding to human apoA-II could not be found to be affected by the reduction and alkylation method after which human poA-II splits into two identical chains.

Animals↗
PubMed1991

Effect of chlorate on the sulfation of lipoprotein lipase and heparan sulfate proteoglycans. Sulfation of heparan sulfate proteoglycans affects lipoprotein lipase degradation.

In avian-cultured adipocytes 76% of the newly synthesized lipoprotein lipase is degraded before release into the medium (Cupp, M., Bensadoun, A., and Melford, K. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262, 6383-6388). The same group (Cisar, L. A., Hoogewerf, A. J., Cupp, M., Rapport, C. A., and Bensadoun, A. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 1767-1774) has proposed that the interaction of lipoprotein lipase with a class of cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans is necessary for degradation to occur. To test further this hypothesis, the binding capacity of the plasma membrane for the lipase was decreased by inhibiting the sulfation of glycosaminoglycans with sodium chlorate, an inhibitor of sulfate adenyltransferase. Chlorate decreased sulfate incorporation into trypsin-releasable heparan sulfate proteoglycans to 20% of control levels. The amount of uronic acid in the trypsin-releasable heparan sulfate proteoglycans remained constant. Therefore, chlorate decreased sulfation density on heparan sulfate chains by approximately 5-fold. In the same fractions, chlorate increased the median heparan sulfate Mr measured on Sephacryl S-300. Chlorate decreased the maximum binding of 125I-lipoprotein lipase to adipocytes by 4-fold, but no significant effects on the affinity constants were observed. Chlorate increased lipoprotein lipase secretion in a dose-dependent relationship up to 30 mM. Utilizing a pulse-chase protocol, it was shown that lipase synthesis in control and chlorate-treated cells was not significantly different and that the increased secretion could be accounted for by a decreased lipoprotein lipase degradation rate. In control cells 77 +/- 11% of the synthesized enzyme was degraded whereas in chlorate-treated cells degradation was reduced to 42 +/- 9% of the synthesized amount. The present study shows that decreased sulfation of heparan sulfate proteoglycans decreases the maximum binding of the lipase for the adipocyte cell surface. Consistent with the model that binding of lipoprotein lipase to cell surface heparan sulfate is required for lipase degradation, degradation is reduced in chlorate-treated cultures. In this report it is also shown that chlorate inhibits lipoprotein lipase sulfation and that desulfation of the enzyme has no effect on its catalytic efficiency or on its binding to cultured adipocytes.

Adipose Tissue↗
PubMed1989

Lipoproteins may provide fatty acids necessary for human lymphocyte proliferation by both low density lipoprotein receptor-dependent and -independent mechanisms.

Human lymphocytes respond optimally to mitogenic stimulation when cultured in serum-free medium supplemented with transferrin if fatty acids necessary for maximal proliferation are provided. Either lipoproteins or exogenous fatty acids support optimal lymphocyte responses. The current studies examined the role of cell surface receptors for low density lipoprotein (LDL) in the enhancement of lymphocyte proliferation. Support of lymphocyte growth by limiting concentrations of LDL was found to involve interaction of the lipoprotein with LDL receptors. Thus, modification of LDL by reductive methylation so as to inhibit receptor-mediated interactions markedly decreased the capacity of LDL to enhance lymphocyte proliferation. Moreover, growth of lymphocytes obtained from patients with LDL receptor-negative homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia was minimal when cultures were supplemented with low concentrations of LDL (less than 10 micrograms cholesterol/ml). LDL also enhanced lymphocyte proliferation by a receptor-independent mechanism since high concentrations (greater than or equal to 50 micrograms cholesterol/ml) supported growth of both normal and familial hypercholesterolemia lymphocytes. In contrast, support of lymphocyte proliferation by high density lipoprotein (HDL) subclass 3 was completely independent of LDL receptors. Thus, HDL3 enhanced responses of both normal and familial hypercholesterolemia lymphocytes in an equivalent concentration-dependent manner; this effect was not altered by reductive methylation of HDL3. One function of lipoproteins in this system may be the provision of fatty acids since oleic and linoleic acids enhanced DNA synthesis by both normal and familial hypercholesterolemia lymphocytes in the absence of lipoproteins. These results indicate that lipoproteins may provide fatty acids necessary for optimal proliferation of human lymphocytes by both LDL receptor-mediated and LDL receptor-independent interactions.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

International Federation of Clinical Chemistry standardization project for the measurement of lipoprotein(a). Phase I. Evaluation of the analytical performance of lipoprotein(a) assay systems and commercial calibrators.

A secondary reference material for lipoprotein(a) is required to standardize the measurement of lipoprotein(a) in clinical laboratories worldwide. Towards this aim, the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry Working Group for the Standardization of Lipoprotein(a) Assays has initiated a standardization project involving a total of 33 diagnostic company and clinical chemistry laboratories from 12 countries. In Phase 1, the analytical performance of 40 lipoprotein(a) assay systems was evaluated by testing sera and manufactured lipoprotein(a) calibrator materials for precision, linearity, and parallelism. Twenty test systems were nonoptimized according to the results for a pooled serum, which tested nonlinear in 16 systems and imprecise in 4. Acceptable analytical properties and harmonization of lipoprotein(a) values were shown by some commercial calibrators, suggesting their possible use as reference materials. This study highlights the problems that currently occur for lipoprotein(a) measurement in existing assay systems.

Calibration↗
PubMed1996

Native lipoproteins inhibit platelet activation induced by oxidized lipoproteins.

Copper-catalyzed oxidation of low-density lipoproteins (LDL) (0.8 g protein/l LDL, 20 mumol/l CuSo4, 37 degrees C) resulted in the formation of thiobarbituric reactive substances that was substantially completed at 24 hrs whereas their formation from high-density lipoproteins (HDL) plateaued at only 25% of that amount after 8 hrs. The oxidized lipoproteins induced aggregation and increases in [Ca2+]i in washed platelets, but not in platelet-rich plasma, and these activating effects were not inhibited by aspirin or EGTA but were inhibited by both of the native lipoproteins. These results show that oxidized HDL, like oxidized LDL, have platelet activating ability and suggest that the native lipoproteins may play a crucial role in preventing the oxidized lipoprotein-mediated platelet activation.

Aspirin↗
PubMed1991

Oxidation of lipoprotein Lp(a). A comparison with low-density lipoproteins.

Aimed at identifying possible mechanisms of the suggested high atherogenicity of Lp(a), its susceptibility for Cu(II)-induced oxidation was studied and compared with that of LDL. Since the content of antioxidants as well as the fatty acid pattern of a lipoprotein greatly affects its oxidizability, Lp(a) and LDL were characterized first with respect to these substances. Paired samples of low-density lipoproteins (LDL) and Lp(a) were isolated from seven individual donors and compared with each other. This study showed that LDL and Lp(a) are very similar with respect to their fatty acid and antioxidant composition. LDL contains approx. 1132 nmol of total fatty acids/mg lipoprotein and LDL 1466 nmol total fatty acids/mg lipoprotein. Analysis of the fatty acid composition of individual lipid classes (cholesteryl esters, phospholipids and triacylglycerols) revealed also a high similarity in the composition of these lipid classes between the two lipoproteins. A comparison of the antioxidant composition showed that Lp(a) contains less alpha-tocopherol than LDL (1.6 +/- 0.35 nmol/mg vs. 2.1 +/- 0.25 nmol/mg LDL). In copper(II)-induced lipid peroxidation experiments we found a striking difference in the susceptibility of individual lipoprotein classes between all donors. In addition, Lp(a) exhibited a 1.2 to 2.4 longer lag-phase than the corresponding LDL preparation from the same blood donor. Treatment of Lp(a) with neuraminidase resulted in a drastic decrease of the lag-phase of Lp(a). Neuraminidase treatment of LDL on the other hand had no significant effects on its susceptibility to oxidation. Supplementation of neuraminidase-treated Lp(a) with N-acetylneuraminic acid (NANA) at concentrations comparable to the naturally occurring amounts of NANA in the Lp(a) protein moiety led to an increase of the lag-phase yielding values which were comparable to those observed with native Lp(a). These results demonstrate that the fatty acid composition as well as the antioxidant concentrations of Lp(a) and LDL are quite similar; despite this fact, Cu2(+)-mediated oxidation of Lp(a) is retarded in comparison to LDL which might be due to the higher content of NANA in Lp(a).

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Oxidized lipoprotein(a) inhibits endothelium-dependent dilation: prevention by high density lipoprotein.

We assessed the effects of human native and oxidized lipoprotein(a) (150 min, 30 and 100 micrograms/ml) on endothelium-dependent vasodilation of isolated rabbit renal arteries. Vasodilation was not attenuated after incubation of arteries with native lipoprotein(a). However, when the arteries were exposed to oxidized lipoprotein(a), acetylcholine-induced vasodilation was dose dependently significantly impaired. Concomitant incubation of segments with high density lipoprotein (HDL, 0.5 mg/ml) prevented the attenuation of dilations induced by oxidized lipoprotein(a). Thus, we report for the first time that oxidized lipoprotein(a) impairs endothelium-dependent vasodilation, and that HDL prevents its inhibitory effect.

Acetylcholine↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Elastin-lipid interaction in the arterial wall. Part 2. In vitro binding of lipoprotein-lipids to arterial elastin and the inhibitory effect of high density lipoproteins on the process.

The mechanism of lipoprotein binding to arterial elastin, and the inhibitory effect of high density lipoprotein (HDL) on the in vitro complex formation between plasma low density lipoprotein (LDL) and elastin were studied. The binding of LDL-cholesterol, phospholipids and triacylglycerols to delipidated elastin increased progressively with time over 24 h of incubation. The results of a kinetic study on lipoprotein-cholesterol concentration in the incubation medium, suggesting that the ability to bind cholesterol to elastin decreases in the following order: very low density lipoprotein (VLDL), LDL, intermediate density lipoprotein (IDL) and HDL, and that the capacities to bind to a fixed amount of elastin decrease in the order: LDL, IDL, VLDL and HDL. When a definite amount of LDL was incubated with elastin in the presence of increasing concentrations of HDL, the binding of lipids to elastin progressively decreased. On the other hand, no release of cholesterol, bound to elastin during preincubation with LDL, could be detected in additional incubations with HDL, apoHDL or apoHDL-phospholipid complex.

Aorta↗
PubMed1996

Effects of postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy on lipoproteins including lipoprotein(a) and LDL subfractions.

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects on lipoprotein risk markers for CHD of oestradiol given alone and in combination with the androgenic progestogen, norethisterone. Eighty postmenopausal women were randomly allocated to receive oestradiol (2 mg/day) alone or with continuous norethisterone (1 mg/day). Serum lipoprotein levels, including lipoprotein(a), were monitored during 12 months on treatment in all the women, and in a sub-set of 32 patients cholesterol was measured in the two major density subfractions of LDL. Oestradiol caused a transient rise in triglycerides, a small decrease in LDL cholesterol (significant only at 3 and 6 months, P < 0.05) and a consistent significant increase in HDL cholesterol (16%, P < 0.01). There was a downward trend in lipoprotein(a) levels which did not achieve statistical significance. The combined preparation caused significant, sustained decreases in triglycerides (31%, P < 0.01), total cholesterol (15%, P < 0.001), VLDL (42%, P < 0.01), LDL (9%, P < 0.05) and HDL (11%, P < 0.001). Lipoprotein(a) was also reduced (39%, P < 0.05). In the sub-set of patients in which LDL subfractions were measured, the reduction in LDL induced by oestradiol monotherapy was significant only at the 3-month visit (6%, P < 0.05). This was due to a decrease in the 'light' (1.025 < d < 1.044 g/ml) subfraction (10%, P < 0.05) and resulted in an apparent shift in subfraction distribution towards the 'heavy' (1.044 < d < 1.060 g/ml) subfraction, although there was no absolute increase in the latter. None of these changes was statistically significant at 12 months. Oestradiol/norethisterone caused sustained decreases in both 'light' (15%, P < 0.05) and 'heavy' (29%, P < 0.05) subfractions, with no significant change in the relative amounts. The changes in 'light' and 'heavy' LDL in this group were highly correlated with changes in triglyceride levels (r = -0.57, P < 0.05 and r = 0.82, P < 0.01 respectively). Therefore, at the end of 1 year's treatment with unopposed oestradiol the only statistically significant change was an increase in HDL cholesterol. Addition of norethisterone to the preparation reversed this potentially beneficial change, but favourably influenced triglycerides, VLDL, LDL subfraction profile and lipoprotein(a), which may counteract the adverse effect on HDL.

Adult↗
PubMed1988

Prednisone increases very low density lipoprotein and high density lipoprotein in healthy men.

To determine the effect of corticosteroids on lipoprotein metabolism in healthy subjects, we measured lipoprotein lipid and apoprotein levels in eight normolipidemic healthy men before, during, and after administration of oral prednisone 0.35 mg/kg/d. After 14 days of prednisone, there was a significant increase in levels (mg/dL) of very low density lipoprotein-triglyceride (VLDL-TG) (51 +/- 9 v 92 +/- 11, P less than .01), very low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (VLDL-C) (19 +/- 2 v 28 +/- 3, P less than .01), high density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) (39 +/- 1 v 50 +/- 4, P less than .05), apolipoprotein (apo) AI (124 +/- 7 v 147 +/- 8, P less than .01), and apo E (3.1 +/- 0.4 v 4.1 +/- 0.4, P less than .01). In addition, the activity of lipoprotein lipase but not hepatic lipase in postheparin plasma also was higher after prednisone treatment. All values returned to baseline within 2 weeks after discontinuation of prednisone. Short-term administration of corticosteroids has a consistent effect on the metabolism of both VLDL and HDL.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Gemfibrozil reduces small low-density lipoprotein more in normolipemic subjects classified as low-density lipoprotein pattern B compared with pattern A.

We tested the hypothesis that gemfibrozil has a differential effect on low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) subclass distributions and postprandial lipemia that is different in subjects classified as having LDL subclass pattern A or LDL pattern B who do not have a classic lipid disorder. Forty-three normolipemic subjects were randomized to gemfibrozil (1,200 mg/day) or placebo for 12 weeks. Lipids and lipoproteins were determined by enzymatic methods. The mass concentrations of lipoproteins in plasma were determined by analytic ultracentrifugation and included the S(f) intervals: 20 to 400 (very LDL), 12 to 20 (intermediate-density lipoprotein), 0 to 12 (LDL), and HDL(2) mass (F(1.20) 3.5 to 9.0) and HDL(3) mass (F(1.20) 0 to 3.5). Postprandial measurements of triglycerides and lipoprotein(a) were taken after the patients consumed a 500 kcal/M(2) test meal. Treatment with gemfibrozil, compared with placebo, significantly reduced fasting plasma triglycerides (difference from placebo +/- SE; -50.2 +/- 20.6 mg/dl, p = 0.02), total cholesterol (-16.4 +/- 7.5 mg/dl, p = 0.04), apolipoprotein B (-16.1 +/- 5.5 mg/dl, p = 0.006), very LDL mass of S(f) 20 to 400 (-50.8 +/- 24.1 mg/dl, p = 0.02), S(f) 20 to 60 (-17.5 +/- 8.5 mg/dl, p = 0.05), S(f) 60 to 100 (-16.2 +/- 8.1 mg/dl, p = 0.05), and increased peak S(F) (0.48 +/- 0.27 Svedberg, p = 0.08). Gemfibrozil reduced the postprandial triglyceride level significantly at 3 (p = 0.04) and 4 (p = 0.05) hours after the test meal. A significantly different subclass response to gemfibrozil was observed in those with LDL pattern A versus B. Those with LDL pattern B had a significantly greater reduction in the small LDL mass S(f) 0 to 7 (p = 0.04), specifically regions S(f) 0 to 3 (p = 0.009) and S(f) 3 to 5 (p = 0.009). In conclusion, normolipemic subjects with either predominantly dense or buoyant LDL respond differently to gemfibrozil as determined by the changes in LDL subclass distribution. Thus, treatment with gemfibrozil may have additional antiatherogenic effects in those with LDL pattern B by decreasing small dense LDL that is not apparent in those with pattern A.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Structural peculiarities of the binding of very low density lipoproteins and low density lipoproteins to the LDL receptor in hypertriglyceridemia: role of apolipoprotein E.

Very low (VLDL) and low density lipoproteins (LDL) were isolated from plasma of patients with the E3/3 phenotype which were divided into three groups based on their plasma triglyceride content: low (TG<200 mg/dl, TG(l)), intermediate (200<300 mg/dl, TG(i)300 mg/dl, TG(h)). The protein density (PD) on the VLDL and LDL surface was calculated from lipoprotein composition and protein location was studied by tryptophan fluorescence quenching by I(-) anions at 25 degrees C and 40 degrees C. A comparison of the TG(h) with the TG(l) group revealed a significant (<0.05) increase of the PD parameter as much as 21% for VLDL, but not for LDL where this parameter did not change for any group; generally, PD(LDL) values were 3.2-3.8-fold lower than PD(VLDL). In accordance with this difference, the tryptophan accessibility f in VLDL vs. LDL was lower at both temperatures. There were temperature-induced changes of the f parameter in opposite directions for these lipoproteins. The difference in f value gradually decreased for VLDL in the direction TG(l)TG(i)TG(h) while for LDL there was a U-shaped dependence for these groups. The Stern-Volmer quenching constant K(S-V) which is sensitive to both temperature and viscosity, did not change for VLDL, but K(S-V)(LDL) was 2-3-fold higher for the TG(i) group compared to the other two. The efficiencies of VLDL and LDL binding to the LDL receptor (LDLr) in vitro were compared by solid-phase assay free of steric hindrance observed in cell binding. The maximal number of binding sites did not change for either type of particles and between groups. The association constant K(a) and apolipoprotein (apo) E/apoB mole ratio values all increased significantly for VLDL, but not for LDL, in comparison of the TG(i+h) with the TG(l) group. Based on VLDL and LDL concentrations in serum and on the affinity constant values obtained in an in vitro assay, VLDL concentrations corresponding to 50% inhibition of LDL binding (IC(50)) were calculated in an assumption of the competition of both ligands for LDLr in vivo; the mean values of IC(50) decreased 2-fold when plasma TG exceeded 200 mg/dl. The functional dependences of K(a)(VLDL), IC(50) and apoE content in VLDL (both fractional and absolute) and in serum on TG content in the whole concentration range studied were fitted to a saturation model. For all five parameters, the mean half-maximum values TG(1/2) were in the range 52-103 mg/dl. The efficiency of protein-protein interactions is suggested to differ in normolipidemic vs. HTG-VLDL and apoE content and/or protein density on VLDL surface may be the primary determinant(s) of the increased binding of HTG-VLDL to the LDL receptor. ApoCs may compete with apoE for the binding to the VLDL lipid surface as plasma triglyceride content increases. The possible competition of VLDL with LDL for the catabolism site(s) in vivo, when plasma TG increases, could explain the atherogenic action of TG-rich lipoproteins. Moreover, the 'dual action' hypothesis on anti-atherogenic action of apoE-containing high density lipoproteins (HDL) in vivo is suggested: besides the well-known effect of HDL as cholesteryl ester catabolic outway, the formation of a transient complex of apoE-containing discs appearing at the site of VLDL TG hydrolysis by lipoprotein lipase with VLDL particles proposed in our preceding paper promotes the efficient uptake of TG-rich particles; in hypertriglyceridemia due to the diminished HDL content this uptake seems to be impaired which results in the increased accumulation of the remnants of TG-rich particles. This explains the observed increase in cholesterol and triglyceride content in VLDL and LDL, respectively, due to the CETP-mediated exchange of cholesteryl ester and triglyceride molecules between these particles.

Apolipoproteins B↗
PubMed2000

Very-low-density lipoprotein binding to the apolipoprotein E receptor 2 is enhanced by lipoprotein lipase, and does not require apolipoprotein E.

The apolipoprotein (apo)E receptor 2 (apoER2) is a recently cloned member of the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor (LDLR) family, showing a high homology with both the LDLR and the very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) receptor (VLDLR). In the present study, the binding characteristics of the apoER2 with respect to apoE and lipoprotein lipase (LPL) were investigated. VLDL was isolated from both apoE-deficient mice and mice expressing the human APOE2 (Arg(158)-->Cys) and APOE3-Leiden isoforms on an Apoe(-/-),Ldlr(-/-) double knock-out background. apoE-rich rabbit beta-VLDL was used as a positive control for binding. Binding experiments performed with Chinese hamster ovary cells expressing the human apoER2 showed that the receptor was able to bind VLDL containing either of the apoE isoforms, as well as the apoE-deficient VLDL. Hence, in contrast with the VLDLR, the apoER2 is not strictly dependent on apoE for VLDL binding. Since LPL has been shown to enhance the binding of lipoproteins to several members of the LDLR family, including the LDLR-related protein, VLDL receptor, gp330 and the LDLR itself, VLDL binding experiments were performed in the presence of LPL. Addition of LPL resulted in a significant increase in apoER2 binding for all VLDL fractions used in this study. In conclusion, lipoprotein binding of VLDL to the apoER2 is enhanced in the presence of LPL, and is not restricted to apoE-containing lipoproteins.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Lipoprotein lipase-mediated selective uptake from low density lipoprotein requires cell surface proteoglycans and is independent of scavenger receptor class B type 1.

Lipoprotein lipase (LpL) hydrolyzes chylomicron and very low density lipoprotein triglycerides to provide fatty acids to tissues. Aside from its lipolytic activity, LpL promotes lipoprotein uptake by increasing the association of these particles with cell surfaces allowing for the internalization by receptors and proteoglycans. Recent studies also indicate that LpL stimulates selective uptake of lipids from high density lipoprotein (HDL) and very low density lipoprotein. To study whether LpL can mediate selective uptake of lipids from low density lipoprotein (LDL), LpL was incubated with LDL receptor negative fibroblasts, and the uptake of LDL protein, labeled with (125)I, and cholesteryl esters traced with [(3)H]cholesteryl oleoyl ether, was compared. LpL mediated greater uptake of [(3)H]cholesteryl oleoyl ether than (125)I-LDL protein, a result that indicated selective lipid uptake. Lipid enrichment of cells was confirmed by measuring cellular cholesterol mass. LpL-mediated LDL selective uptake was not affected by the LpL inhibitor tetrahydrolipstatin but was nearly abolished by heparin, monoclonal anti-LpL antibodies, or chlorate treatment of cells and was not found using proteoglycan-deficient Chinese hamster ovary cells. Selective uptake from HDL, but not LDL, was 2-3-fold greater in scavenger receptor class B type I overexpressing cells (SR-BI cells) than compared control cells. LpL, however, induced similar increases in selective uptake from LDL and HDL in either control or SR-BI cells, indicative of the SR-BI-independent pathway. This was further supported by ability of LpL to promote selective uptake from LDL in human embryonal kidney 293 cells, cells that do not express SR-BI. In Chinese hamster ovary cell lines that overexpress LpL, we also found that selective uptake from LDL was induced by both endogenous and exogenous LpL. Transgenic mice that overexpress human LpL via a muscle creatine kinase promoter had more LDL selective uptake in muscle than did wild type mice. In summary LpL stimulates selective uptake of cholesteryl esters from LDL via pathways that are distinct from SR-BI. Moreover this process also occurs in vivo in tissues where abundant LpL is present.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Low-density lipoprotein particle size, triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, and glucose tolerance in non-diabetic men with essential hypertension.

The aim of the study is to investigate serum lipoproteins abnormalities including low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particle size, and their relationship with other cardiovascular risk factors in men with essential hypertension. Plasma glucose and serum insulin levels during oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), serum lipoprotein(a), apolipoprotein (apo) A-I. apo B. cholesterol and triglycerides in serum and in lipoproteins, and LDL particle diameter were measured in thirty-eight consecutive newly-diagnosed non-diabetic untreated hypertensive men and 38 healthy male controls. Plasma glucose at baseline, 60 and 120 min during OGTT was significantly higher in patients than controls whereas serum insulin levels did not differ between patients and controls. Serum apo B and triglycerides were significantly raised in patients compared with controls (1.08 +/- 0.17 g/L [mean +/- SD] vs 0.97 +/- 0.22 g/L. p < 0.05, and 1.56 +/- 0.90 mmol/L vs 1.15 +/- 0.57 mmol/L, p < 0.05, respectively). Very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) triglycerides and LDL-cholesterol were increased in patients compared with controls (0.89 +/- 0.79 mmol/L and 0.54 +/- 0.35 mmol/L, p < 0.05, and 4.08 +/- 0.85 mmol/L and 3.60 +/- 0.92 mmol/L, p < 0.05, respectively) whereas high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol was lower in patients compared with controls 0.95 +/- 0.22 mmol/L and 1.07 +/- 0.20 mmol/L, p < 0.05). Adjustment for body mass index, abdominal/hip perimeter ratio and area under the glucose curve did not attenuate the relationship between hypertension and VLDL-triglycerides. Six patients and two controls had a mean LDL diameter < or = 25.5 nm and in the former serum triglycerides ranged from 1.86 mmol/L to 2.37 mmol/L. Mean LDL particle diameter in both patients and controls showed an inverse relationship with log-transformed serum triglycerides (r = - 0.51, p < 0.001 and r = - 0.47, p < 0.005, respectively). Among patients, those with serum triglycerides > or = [corrected] 1.58 mmol/L had a lesser mean LDL diameter than those with triglycerides above this threshold (25.78 +/- 0.47 nm vs 26.30 +/- 0.35 nm, p < 0.001). Higher plasma glucose, serum apo B and LDL-cholesterol as well as the decrease in serum HDL-cholesterol in patients with hypertension are consistent with high coronary heart disease risk. Not only mild hypertriglyceridemia but also high-normal serum triglycerides in themselves or as a surrogate of a predominance of small dense LDL particles in plasma convey an additional risk for cardiovascular disease in hypertensive patients even though routine plasma lipids are within or near normal range.

Adult↗
PubMed1987

Effect of the composition of very low and low density lipoproteins on the rate of cholesterylester transfer from high density lipoproteins in man, studied in vitro.

The process of cholesterylester (CE) transfer is supposed to be a regulatory factor in the distribution of CE between lipoproteins. In addition to the activity of CE transfer protein, this process may be affected by acceptor lipoprotein characteristics. In this study the effect of the composition of different very low density lipoproteins (VLDL) and low density lipoproteins (LDL) on the ability to accept CE from HDL in vitro was investigated. [3H]-CE high density lipoprotein (HDL) (100 nmol CE) from one batch was incubated with VLDL (75 nmol CE), isolated from fifteen subjects for 4 h and separately with LDL (250 nmol CE), isolated from thirteen subjects for 16 h, both in the presence of lipoprotein-free plasma providing a source of cholesterylester transfer protein. The CE transfer rate of VLDL (range 1.34-2.84% [3H]-CE transferred h-1) was correlated to the triacylglycerol (TG):CE molar ratio (r: 0.63, P less than 0.05), to the phospholipid (PL):CE molar ratio (r: 0.75, P less than 0.01), to the protein (Pr):CE ratio (expressed in g nmol-1) (r: 0.72, P less than 0.01) and to the free cholesterol (FC):CE molar ratio (r: 0.69, P less than 0.01), but not to the FC:PL molar ratio (r: -0.08, NS). The CE transfer rate to LDL (range 1.18-3.59 nmol CE h-1) was correlated to the Pr:CE ratio (r: 0.72, P less than 0.01) and inversely to the FRC:PL molar ratio (r: -0.88, P less than 0.001), but not to the TG:CE molar ratio (r: 0.40, NS), nor to the FC:CE molar ratio (r: -0.37, NS).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Blood Proteins↗
PubMed2005

Enhanced conversion of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and increased low-density lipoprotein removal in LPLS447X carriers.

OBJECTIVE: Lipoprotein lipase (LPL) exerts 2 principal actions, comprising enzymatic hydrolysis of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TRLs) and nonenzymatic ligand capacity for enhancing lipoprotein removal. The common LPLS447X variant has been associated with cardiovascular protection, for which the mechanism is unknown. We therefore evaluated enzymatic and nonenzymatic consequences of this LPL variant on TRL metabolism. METHODS AND RESULTS: TRL apolipoprotein B100 (apoB100) metabolism was determined in 5 homozygous LPLS447X carriers and 5 controls. Subjects were continuously fed and received infusion of stable isotope l-[1-(13C)]-valine. Results were analyzed by SAAMII modeling. Also, preheparin and postheparin LPL concentration and activity were measured. Compared with controls, carriers presented increased very low-density lipoprotein 1 (VLDL1) to VLDL2 apoB100 flux (P=0.04), increased VLDL2 to intermediate-density lipoprotein (IDL) apoB100 flux (P=0.02), increased IDL to low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apoB100 flux (P=0.049), as well as an increased LDL clearance (P=0.04). Additionally, IDL apoB100 synthesis was attenuated (P=0.05). Preheparin LPL concentration was 4-fold higher compared with controls (P=0.01), and a correlation was observed between preheparin LPL concentration and LDL clearance (r2=0.92; P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Enhanced TRL conversion and enhanced LDL removal combined with increased preheparin LPL concentration suggest increased enzymatic consequences as well as increased nonenzymatic consequences of LPL in LPLS447X carriers, which might both contribute to the cardiovascular benefit of this LPL variant.

Adult↗