Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Gabapentin”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 451 records · Page 25Linked to original sources

Central post-stroke pain syndrome: yet another use for gabapentin?

Although gabapentin was originally developed for treating partial seizures, it has been used mainly to treat various peripheral neuropathic pain conditions; however, there is very limited experience with gabapentin for the treatment of pain conditions of the central nervous system like central post-stroke pain syndrome. We report the case of a 45-yr old man with central post-stroke pain syndrome who failed to respond to a variety of oral analgesics, but within 2 wk of the inception of gabapentin therapy, his average pain was significantly reduced and his level of function improved. We conclude that gabapentin may be an effective medication for the treatment of central post-stroke pain syndrome.

Acetates↗

Gabapentin adjunctive therapy in neuropathic pain states.

OBJECTIVE: This is a report of a trial of the new antiepileptic agent gabapentin in patients with intractable neuropathic pain. DESIGN: A case series of patients with a diagnosis of neuropathic pain whose previous management was inadequate were given oral gabapentin in increasing doses and were followed for a minimum of 2 months, monitored for efficacy and side effects. SETTING: An outpatient pain management center located within a major university medical center. PATIENTS: Convenience sample of patients referred for management of intractable neuropathic pain. INTERVENTIONS: Simplification of existing pharmacologic management, addition of gabapentin, and attempted reduction of opiate analgesic doses. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient self-reports and pain scores in successive office visits. RESULTS: Gabapentin provides analgesic activity for patients with neuropathic pain and has the advantage of a low side effect profile and drug toxicity.

Acetates↗

Gabapentin for neuropathic pain: systematic review of controlled and uncontrolled literature.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy/effectiveness and side effects of gabapentin for the treatment of neuropathic pain. DESIGN: Systematic review of the literature. METHODS: Extensive search of several electronic databases located both controlled and uncontrolled studies. Efficacy was assessed through meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), whereas the effectiveness of gabapentin in uncontrolled studies was assessed via a novel system of dichotomous classification of "bad" versus "good" results. FINDINGS: Thirty-five papers involving 727 patients with multiple neuropathic pain conditions met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis of the 2 high-quality, placebo-controlled RCTs showed positive effect of gabapentin in diabetic neuropathy and post-herpetic neuralgia. The addition of 2 low-quality, placebo-controlled RCTs did not alter the magnitude or direction of observed effect. The uncontrolled studies demonstrated positive effect on pain in different neuropathic syndromes, as well as benefit on different types of neuropathic pain; highest dose administered and rate-of-dose escalation showed wide variability between prescribers. Fewer and less severe side effects were reported in the uncontrolled studies. CONCLUSIONS: Gabapentin seems to be effective in multiple painful neuropathic conditions. The variable prescribing patterns of the uncontrolled studies raise the suspicion that effectiveness may be reduced if one limits administration of the drug to very low doses, whereas rapid dose escalation may be associated with increased central nervous system side effects. Well-designed controlled trials may provide insight into differential symptom sensitivity to the drug.

Acetates↗

Gabapentin-induced hypersensitivity syndrome.

Hypersensitivity syndrome is a rare but potentially fatal reaction to some pharmacologic agents, including some antiepileptic drugs. Typically, the syndrome presents with fever, rash, tender lymphadenopathy, hepatitis, and eosinophilia. We report a novel case of clinical hypersensitivity syndrome secondary to gabapentin. A patient developed altered mental status, fever, diffuse macular rash, and an enlarged spleen. This constellation of symptoms and signs began 9 days after gabapentin therapy was begun. Quick resolution was noted after gabapentin was discontinued. To our knowledge, there are no reports of hypersensitivity syndrome to gabapentin.

Acetates↗

Effectiveness of gabapentin for the treatment of behavioral disorders in dementia.

Twelve patients with moderate to severe dementia and severe behavioral disorders were treated with open-label gabapentin (200-1,200 mg/day) for 8 weeks in a prospective case-series design. Patients were nonresponders to previous trials of neuroleptics. Behaviors were measured at 2-week intervals with the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI), the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI), and the Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI). Gabapentin was generally well tolerated in this population. Although 42% of patients experienced adverse events such as gait instability and sedation, only two patients discontinued treatment prematurely because of adverse events. Average patient scores for the CMAI and the NPI remained unchanged after gabapentin. On the CGI, two patients were much improved, three were minimally improved, six were unchanged, and one was minimally worse. Gabapentin may have a role in treating a subgroup of dementia patients with severe behavioral disorders who have not responded to neuroleptics.

Acetates↗

Gabapentin "add-on therapy" for idiopathic chronic hiccup (ICH).

The efficacy of cisapride, omeprazole, and baclofen (COB) for treatment of idiopathic chronic hiccup (ICH). was proven in several studies. The combination is considered, at present, to be "therapy of choice" for this condition. Substituting gabapentin for baclofen in baclofen resistant ICH cases can occasionally be successful. We present here cases where gabapentin was used successfully in combination with cisapride and omeprazole (COG/one patient) or as an "add-on" with cisapride, omeprazole, and baclofen (COBG/three patients). We conclude that, with baclofen and gabapentin, we are in possession of two substances that are, as a part of a combination therapy, quite effective for ICH. Because of the far more extensive experience with baclofen, we use it as a first-line therapy, together with omeprazole and cisapride. In cases where the results are not entirely satisfactory, the addition of gabapentin should be considered.

Acetates↗

Treatment of tinnitus with gabapentin: a pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of gabapentin (Neurontin) improve the disease-specific quality of life in patients with moderate tinnitus. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. SETTING: Single-center academic outpatient otolaryngology practice. INTERVENTION: Gabapentin 1800 mg daily versus placebo. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The study design is a randomized, double blind placebo controlled single site trial conducted in an academic medical center. Inclusion criteria included patients between ages 18 and 70 with a complaint of nonpulsatile, subjective tinnitus, bilateral or unilateral, greater than 3 months in duration. The primary outcome measure is the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory; secondary measures include the Profile of Mood States (POMS) rating scale, subjective tinnitus severity. The null hypothesis addressed in this study is that the drug would not result in significant alleviation of the symptom of tinnitus. RESULTS: Seventy-six patients completed the trial; of these 52 received the drug. No significant differences were found between the two groups after 5 weeks of treatment with gabapentin. CONCLUSION: There is insufficient evidence to support the effectiveness of gabapentin in the treatment of tinnitus.

Adolescent↗

Effect of gabapentin on the sensation and impact of tinnitus.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: This study evaluated the effectiveness of gabapentin in treating chronic tinnitus in two populations: participants with tinnitus with associated acoustic trauma and participants with tinnitus without associated acoustic trauma. The hypothesis was that gabapentin would decrease both subjective and objective features of tinnitus in the trauma group but would be less effective in the nontrauma group. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, placebo-controlled, single-blind clinical trial. METHODS: Pure-tone audiograms and personal histories were used to categorize tinnitus etiology as either secondary to acoustic trauma or not associated with acoustic trauma. Participants were restricted to those with moderate to severe tinnitus for at least 1 year. All participants received gabapentin in a graduated ascending-descending dose series extending over 20 weeks (peak dose of 2,400 mg/d). RESULTS: There was a significant improvement in tinnitus annoyance for the trauma group (P = .05). Other subjective aspects of tinnitus were not significantly affected in either group. Between-subject variability of therapeutic response was considerable. Nevertheless, in consideration of subjective loudness ratings, 4 of 19 nontrauma participants and 6 of 20 trauma participants showed an improvement of 20% or better. In consideration of psychoacoustic loudness estimates, 3 of 19 nontrauma and 6 of 20 trauma participants showed an improvement of 20 dB HL or greater. Evenly dividing each group into high and low responders revealed significant improvement in loudness at 1,800 and 2,400 mg/day for the trauma high-response subgroup (P = .007). No significant improvement was obtained for other subgroups. CONCLUSION: Gabapentin is effective in reducing subjective and objective aspects of tinnitus in some individuals, with the best therapeutic response obtained in individuals with associated acoustic trauma.

Adolescent↗

Dual effects of gabapentin and pregabalin on glutamate release at rat entorhinal synapses in vitro.

We have recently shown that the anticonvulsant drugs phenytoin, lamotrigine and sodium valproate all reduce the release of glutamate at synapses in the entorhinal cortex in vitro. In the present investigation we determined whether this property was shared by gabapentin and pregabalin, using whole-cell patch-clamp recordings of excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) in layer V neurons in slices of rat entorhinal cortex. Both drugs reduced the amplitude and increased the paired-pulse ratio of EPSCs evoked by electrical stimulation of afferent inputs, suggesting a presynaptic effect to reduce glutamate release. The frequency of spontaneous EPSCs (sEPSCs) was concurrently reduced by GBP, further supporting a presynaptic action. There was no significant change in amplitude although a slight reduction was seen, particularly with gabapentin, which may reflect a reduction in the number of larger amplitude sEPSCs. When activity-independent miniature EPSCs were recorded in the presence of tetrodotoxin, both drugs continued to reduce the frequency of events with no change in amplitude. The reduction in frequency induced by gabapentin or pregabalin was blocked by application of the l-amino acid transporter substrate l-isoleucine. The results show that gabapentin and pregabalin, like other anticonvulsants, reduce glutamate release at cortical synapses. It is possible that this reduction is a combination of two effects: a reduction of activity-dependent release possibly via interaction with P/Q-type voltage-gated Ca channels, and a second action, as yet unidentified, occurring downstream of Ca influx into the presynaptic terminals.

Amines↗

Gabapentin monotherapy for the symptomatic treatment of painful neuropathy: a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Pain is the most disturbing symptom of diabetic neuropathy. Traditionally this type of pain was treated with tricyclic antidepressants which frequently have many side effects. In the study reported here, gabapentin was administered in escalating doses up to 3600 mg per day to eligible patients with moderate to severe diabetic neuropathy pain in a double blind placebo controlled fashion. Gabapentin provided superior and significant pain relief over placebo. In addition, patients taking gabapentin had improvement of sleep scores and a number of items on mood and quality of life questionnaires. Gabapentin was tolerated well with mild and tolerable side effects.

Acetates↗

Injury type-specific calcium channel alpha 2 delta-1 subunit up-regulation in rat neuropathic pain models correlates with antiallodynic effects of gabapentin.

The calcium channel alpha2delta-1 subunit is a structural subunit important for functional calcium channel assembly. In vitro studies have shown that this subunit is the binding site for gabapentin, an anticonvulsant that exerts antihyperalgesic effects by unknown mechanisms. Increased expression of this subunit in the spinal cord and dorsal root ganglia (DRG) has been suggested to play a role in enhanced nociceptive responses of spinal nerve-injured rats to innocuous mechanical stimulation (allodynia). To investigate whether a common mechanism underlies allodynic states derived from different etiologies, and if so, whether similar alpha2delta-1 subunit up-regulation correlates with these allodynic states, we compared DRG and spinal cord alpha2delta-1 subunit levels and gabapentin sensitivity in allodynic rats with mechanical nerve injuries (sciatic nerve chronic constriction injury, spinal nerve transection, or ligation), a metabolic disorder (diabetes), or chemical neuropathy (vincristine neurotoxicity). Our data indicated that even though allodynia occurred in all types of nerve injury investigated, DRG and/or spinal cord alpha2delta-1 subunit up-regulation and gabapentin sensitivity only coexisted in the mechanical and diabetic neuropathies. Thus, induction of the alpha2delta-1 subunit in the DRG and spinal cord is likely regulated by factors that are specific for individual neuropathies and may contribute to gabapentin-sensitive allodynia. However, the calcium channel alpha2delta-1 subunit is not the sole molecular change that uniformly characterizes the neuropathic pain states.

Acetates↗

Inhibition of paclitaxel-induced A-fiber hypersensitization by gabapentin.

Paclitaxel (Taxol) is a widely used chemotherapeutic agent in the treatment of several tumors. However, its use is often associated with the generation of peripheral neuropathic pain expressed as mechanical allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia. The molecular mechanism behind this debilitating side effect is obscure, and efficient drugs for its prevention are required. We sought to clarify the cellular changes in the involved nociceptor types underlying paclitaxel-induced neuropathic pain and to test for an alleviating effect of gabapentin treatment in a murine model of paclitaxel-induced neuropathic pain. We found that a single treatment with paclitaxel (4 mg/kg i.p.) led to a decrease in both thermal and mechanical nociceptive thresholds as well as a reduction in the thresholds for 250-Hz (A delta-fiber) and 2000 Hz (A beta-fiber) but not 5-Hz (C-fiber) sine wave electrical stimuli-induced paw withdrawal. The paclitaxel-induced neuropathic pain was completely abrogated by gabapentin (30 mg/kg i.p.) treatment. Furthermore, we found that mRNA and protein levels of the voltage-gated calcium channel (alpha 2)delta-1 subunit (Ca(alpha 2)delta-1), one of the putative targets for gabapentin, was up-regulated in dorsal root ganglions (DRGs), as well as increased expression of Ca(alpha 2)delta-1 protein in medium/large-sized DRG neurons by immunohistochemistry, following paclitaxel treatment. This suggests that paclitaxel induces A-fiber-specific hypersensitization, which may contribute to the functional mechanical allodynia and hyperalgesia, and that gabapentin could be a potential therapeutic agent for paclitaxel-induced neuropathic pain.

Amines↗

Comparison of antiepileptic drugs tiagabine, lamotrigine, and gabapentin in mouse models of acute, prolonged, and chronic nociception.

Some antiepileptic drugs have been shown to be clinically effective in the treatment of neuropathic pain. This study determined whether the new antiepileptic drug tiagabine, a GABA uptake inhibitor, is efficacious in mice in a broad range of nociceptive tests (hot-plate, formalin, and dynorphin-induced chronic allodynia) and compared tiagabine's potency with two other antiepileptic drugs, gabapentin and lamotrigine. Intraperitoneally administered tiagabine, but not lamotrigine, gabapentin, or i.t. tiagabine, produced dose-dependent antinoception in the hot-plate test. A 5-min pretreatment with tiagabine (2-29 nmol i.t.) dose-dependently inhibited both the acute and late phase formalin behaviors; pretreatment with lamotrigine (4-265 nmol i.t.) inhibited only the late phase. In the formalin assay the GABA(A) antagonist bicuculline reversed the acute phase antinociception, whereas the GABA(B) antagonist saclofen reversed both the acute and late phase tiagabine-induced antinociception. Tiagabine administered i.p. but not i.t. dose-dependently reduced dynorphin-induced chronic allodynia for 120 min. Gabapentin and lamotrigine produced antinociception administered either i.t. or i.p. in a dose-dependent manner. Thus, we have shown that gabapentin and lamotrigine produced antinociception in two mouse models of pain, whereas tiagabine produced antinociception in all three mouse models of pain.

Acetates↗

Effects of gabapentin on the different components of peripheral and central neuropathic pain syndromes: a pilot study.

Anticonvulsants are widely used in the treatment of neuropathic pain, and are assumed to act preferentially on lancinating, shooting pain. In the present study, the effects of gabapentin, a novel anticonvulsant, were evaluated systematically on both spontaneous and evoked pain in 18 patients with peripheral nerve injuries or central lesions. Gabapentin was administered orally in gradually increasing doses up to a maximum of 2,400 mg/day. Evaluations of spontaneous ongoing and paroxysmal pain, allodynia and hyperalgesia were performed at the beginning of the study ('baseline') and 6 weeks after the steady-state dose had been reached. Quantitative sensory tests were used to measure detection and pain thresholds to mechanical and thermal stimuli and the responses to suprathreshold stimuli. Gabapentin induced a moderate and statistically significant relief of ongoing spontaneous pain and was particularly effective in reducing paroxysmal pain. A striking finding was the significant effect on brush-induced and cold allodynia. In contrast, no effects were observed on detection and pain thresholds to static mechanical and hot stimuli. Side effects were generally minor and did not interfere with everyday activities. The present study suggests that gabapentin has preferential antihyperalgesic and/or antiallodynic effects, and is equally effective in pain due to peripheral nerve injuries and central lesions.

Acetates↗

Effects of gabapentin on anxiety induced by simulated public speaking.

The effects of gabapentin, 400 mg and 800 mg, on anxiety induced by simulated public speaking (SPS) were investigated. Thirty-two normal male volunteers (aged 17-30 years) had their anxiety and mood evaluated by self-scales [Visual Analogue Mood Scale (VAMS) and Profile of Mood State (POMS)] during the SPS procedure. Physiological measures (heart rate and blood pressure) were taken. Treatment with gabapentin at 800 mg attenuated the anxiety of subjects that had a decrease on the VAMS item calm-excite. In addition, volunteers that received gabapentin at 400 mg and 800 mg showed a decrease in the hostility score in POMS. Our results suggest, in agreement with other studies, an anxiolytic potential to gabapentin.

Acetates↗

Gabapentin in naive childhood absence epilepsy: results from two double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter studies.

Efficacy and safety of gabapentin monotherapy were evaluated in 33 children with newly diagnosed absence epilepsy in two identical, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials in which a 2-week double-blind treatment phase was followed by a 6-week open-label phase. Primary efficacy criterion was seizure frequency change from baseline to end of double-blind treatment derived from quantified electroencephalograms. Primary efficacy analyses compared treatment differences in the 2-week double-blind phase. Gabapentin did not significantly decrease or increase seizure frequency compared with placebo. Low dosages with possibly subtherapeutic plasma levels may have contributed to the lack of demonstrable efficacy. Somnolence and dizziness were the only adverse events reported by at least two patients during gabapentin treatment. No clinically important changes in laboratory assessments or other safety parameters were observed. Gabapentin monotherapy at dosages ranging from 9.7 through 19.1 mg/kg/day is well tolerated in pediatric patients aged 4 through 12 years with absence epilepsy.

Acetates↗

Gabapentin: a unique anti-epileptic agent.

Gabapentin is an anti-epileptic drug (AED) that was approved in 1993 for the adjunct treatment of complex partial seizures (CPS) with and without generalization. Although the mechanism of action of gabapentin has not been fully elucidated, it has been shown to be effective not only as an adjunct AED in patients with CPS, but also in children with epilepsy, many pain syndromes (most notably neuropathic pain), and several other neurological diseases. The efficacy of the drug as an AED In both adults and children has been mostly seen when used as an adjunct with other AEDs. When used as monotherapy, it has been most effective for CPS in adults at higher doses. Gabapentin as monotherapy in children has not been shown to be as beneficial as in adults. Also, the dosing of the drug in children has been complicated by negative behavioral adverse effects. Overall, gabapentin has a low incidence of adverse effects, a pharmacokinetic profile that limits its drug interactions, and limited effects on cognition when compared to traditional AEDs. The dosing of the drug is dependent on the disease state targeted, the number of specific therapeutic drugs used, and the renal function of the patient.

Acetates↗

Phase III randomized trial of gabapentin in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Preclinical and clinical studies of gabapentin in patients with ALS led the authors to undertake a phase III randomized clinical trial. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned, in a double-blinded fashion, to receive oral gabapentin 3,600 mg or placebo daily for 9 months. The primary outcome measure was the average rate of decline in isometric arm muscle strength for those with two or more evaluations. RESULTS: Two hundred four patients enrolled, 196 had two or more evaluations, and 128 patients completed the study. The mean rate of decline of the arm muscle strength was not significantly different between the groups. Moreover, there was no beneficial effect upon the rate of decline of other secondary measures (vital capacity, survival, ALS functional rating scale, timed walking) nor was there any symptomatic benefit. In fact, analysis of the combined data from the phase II and III trials revealed a significantly more rapid decline of forced vital capacity in patients treated with gabapentin. CONCLUSION: These data provide no evidence of a beneficial effect of gabapentin on disease progression or symptoms in patients with ALS.

Acetates↗