Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Cannabinoid Receptor Modulators”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 451 records · Page 25Linked to original sources
PubMed2001

Cannabinoidergic and opioidergic inhibition of spinal reflexes in the decerebrated, spinalized rabbit.

The present experiments were designed to investigate the role(s) of cannabinoid receptors in modulating transmission in the sural-medial gastrocnemius withdrawal reflex of the decerebrated, spinalized rabbit and how, if present, cannabinoid-mediated control might interact with opioid-mediated inhibitions known to impinge on this reflex pathway. The selective CB(1) receptor antagonist SR 141716A enhanced reflexes by a factor of two after a cumulative dose of 100 nmol kg(-1) i.v., but had no effect on the endogenous opioid-mediated inhibition generated by repetitive electrical stimulation of the common peroneal nerve, or on the suppression of reflexes caused by i.v. administration of the synthetic opioid fentanyl. Given at a dose of 10 nmol kg(-1) i.v., the potent, CB(1)--CB(2) cannabinoid receptor agonist HU 210 inhibited medial gastrocnemius reflexes to approximately 30% of controls and significantly decreased both heart rate and blood pressure, but did not alter the inhibition of reflexes resulting from common peroneal nerve stimulation or i.v. fentanyl. The effects of HU 210 were reversed by SR 141716A. HU 210 was just as effective in inhibiting reflexes in the presence of the opioid antagonist naloxone (5 micromol kg(-1)) as it was in untreated animals. The data show that cannabinoids, acting through CB(1) receptors, are inhibitory in rabbit spinal cord and that there appears to be some endogenous cannabinoid tone under the conditions of the present experiments. The evidence of this study is that the inhibitory effects of opioids and cannabinoids in rabbit spinal cord are completely independent of each other, and are additive rather than synergistic.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Endocannabinoid lipids and mediated system: implications for alcoholism and neuropsychiatric disorders.

Several natural lipids have emerged as candidate modulators of central nervous system (CNS) functions. Fatty acid amides and their coupled signaling pathways are known to regulate several physiological and behavioral processes. Recent studies from our laboratory and others also have implicated endogenous marijuana-like brain constituents, endocannabinoids (ECs), and cannabinoid-1 (CB1) receptors in the neural circuitry that mediate drug addiction and neuropsychiatric disorders. Neuroadaptation to chronic ethanol (EtOH) has been shown to involve changes in the EC system. These changes include alterations in the synthesis of EC, their precursors, as well as density and coupling efficacy of CB1 receptors. The evidence for the participation of the EC system in the pathophysiology of various neuropsychiatric disorders is just beginning to evolve. It is of great interest to explore the components of EC system in different areas of the CNS for further understanding of its role in health and disease. This article presents a comprehensive overview of the currently available literature pertaining to the role of the EC system in alcoholism, schizophrenia, depression and/or suicide.

Alcoholism↗
PubMed2005

The phylogenetic distribution and evolutionary origins of endocannabinoid signalling.

The endocannabinoid signalling system in mammals comprises several molecular components, including cannabinoid receptors (e.g. CB1, CB2), putative endogenous ligands for these receptors [e.g. anandamide, 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG)] and enzymes involved in the biosynthesis and inactivation of anandamide (e.g. NAPE-PLD, FAAH) and 2-AG (e.g. DAG lipase, MGL). In this review we examine the occurrence of these molecules in non-mammalian organisms (in particular, animals and plants) by surveying published data and by basic local alignment search tool (BLAST) analysis of the GenBank database and of genomic sequence data from several vertebrate and invertebrate species. We conclude that the ability of cells to synthesise molecules that are categorised as "endocannabinoids" in mammals is an evolutionarily ancient phenomenon that may date back to the unicellular common ancestor of animals and plants. However, exploitation of these molecules for intercellular signalling may have occurred independently in different lineages during the evolution of the eukaryotes. The CB1- and CB2-type receptors that mediate effects of endocannabinoids in mammals occur throughout the vertebrates, and an orthologue of vertebrate cannabinoid receptors was recently identified in the deuterostomian invertebrate Ciona intestinalis (CiCBR). However, orthologues of the vertebrate cannabinoid receptors are not found in protostomian invertebrates (e.g. Drosophila, Caenorhabditis elegans). Therefore, it is likely that a CB1/CB2-type cannabinoid receptor originated in a deuterostomian invertebrate. This phylogenetic information provides a basis for exploitation of selected non-mammalian organisms as model systems for research on endocannabinoid signalling.

Amidohydrolases↗
PubMed2004

Changes in endocannabinoid contents in reward-related brain regions of alcohol-exposed rats, and their possible relevance to alcohol relapse.

1. Chronic alcohol exposure modifies endocannabinoid levels in different brain regions, while pharmacological targeting of the endocannabinoid system has been reported to influence ethanol intake in laboratory animals. 2. The present study was aimed at evaluating the pattern of changes of endocannabinoids and their receptors, with emphasis on reward-related brain areas, in Wistar rats subjected to consecutive phases of alcoholization, alcohol deprivation (abstinence), and voluntary consumption of alcohol (relapse). 3. We observed that, in the limbic forebrain, anandamide (AEA) and 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) contents increased after 7 days of alcoholization, then to dramatically decrease after 48 h of alcohol deprivation and, in the case of 2-AG, to further decrease when rats were allowed to relapse to alcohol consumption. By contrast, in the midbrain, there was a marked reduction in AEA, but not 2-AG, content, after alcoholization. This decrease was not affected during alcohol abstinence, but both AEA and 2-AG contents were then significantly reduced when rats were allowed to relapse to alcohol consumption. 4. Based on these data, we examined whether pharmacological activation/blockade of endocannabinoid transmission might influence ethanol intake in rats allowed to relapse to alcohol consumption after subsequent periods of alcoholization and alcohol deprivation. 5. Treatment with either Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol or CP55,940, two cannabinoid agonists, reduced both total liquid and ethanol intake but did not affect ethanol preference. Treatment with SR141716, a selective cannabinoid CB(1) receptor antagonist, also produced a significant reduction in both total liquid and ethanol intake without affecting ethanol preference. Accordingly, none of these effects on ethanol intake were accompanied by changes in dopamine and GABA in limbic structures. 6. In summary, the levels of endocannabinoids underwent significant changes in reward-related areas during alcoholization, alcohol deprivation, and relapse, showing the lowest values in this latter phase. Treatment with cannabinoid agonists or a selective CB(1) receptor antagonist resulted in a reduction of ethanol intake by rats allowed to relapse to alcohol consumption after periods of alcoholization and alcohol deprivation, but these effects did not appear to be due to changes in neurobiological substrates currently involved in alcohol reinforcement/relapse.

Alcoholism↗
PubMed2005

Endocannabinoids in the regulation of appetite and body weight.

The discovery of cannabinoid receptors, together with the development of selective cannabinoid receptor antagonists, has encouraged a resurgence of cannabinoid pharmacology. With the identification of endogenous agonists, such as anandamide, scientists have sought to uncover the biological role of endocannabinoid systems; initially guided by the long-established actions of cannabis and exogenous cannabinoids such as delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). In particular, considerable research has examined endocannabinoid involvement in appetite, eating behaviour and body weight regulation. It is now confirmed that endocannabinoids, acting at brain CB1 cannabinoid receptors, stimulate appetite and ingestive behaviours, partly through interactions with more established orexigenic and anorexigenic signals. Key structures such as the nucleus accumbens and hypothalamic nuclei are sensitive sites for the hyperphagic actions of these substances, and endocannabinoid activity in these regions varies in relation to nutritional status and feeding expression. Behavioural studies indicate that endocannabinoids increase eating motivation by enhancing the incentive salience and hedonic evaluation of ingesta. Moreover, there is strong evidence of an endocannabinoid role in energy metabolism and fuel storage. Recent developments point to potential clinical benefits of cannabinoid receptor antagonists in the management of obesity, and of agonists in the treatment of other disorders of eating and body weight regulation.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Cannabinoid-1 receptor: a novel target for the treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders.

G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR)-mediated signalling is the most widely used signalling mechanism in cells, and its regulation is important for various physiological functions. The cannabinoid-1 (CB(1)) receptor, a GPCR, has been shown to play a critical role in neural circuitries mediating motivation, mood and emotional behaviours. Several recent studies have indicated that impairment of CB(1) receptor-mediated signalling may play a critical role in the pathophysiology of various neuropsychiatric disorders. In this article, the authors briefly review literature relating to the role played by the endocannabinoid system in various neuropsychiatric disorders, and the CB(1) receptor as a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of alcoholism, depression, anxiety and schizophrenia.

Cannabinoid Receptor Modulators↗
PubMed2006

Endocannabinoids and the gastrointestinal tract.

In the past centuries, different preparations of marijuana have been used for the treatment of gastrointestinal (GI) disorders, such as GI pain, gastroenteritis and diarrhea. Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC; the active component of marijuana), as well as endogenous and synthetic cannabinoids, exert their biological functions on the gastrointestinal tract by activating two types of cannabinoid receptors, cannabinoid type 1 receptor (CB1 receptor) and cannabinoid type 2 receptor (CB2 receptor). While CB1 receptors are located in the enteric nervous system and in sensory terminals of vagal and spinal neurons and regulate neurotransmitter release, CB2 receptors are mostly distributed in the immune system, with a role presently still difficult to establish. Under pathophysiological conditions, the endocannabinoid system conveys protection to the GI tract, eg from inflammation and abnormally high gastric and enteric secretion. For such protective activities, the endocannabinoid system may represent a new promising therapeutic target against different GI disorders, including frankly inflammatory bowel diseases (eg, Crohn's disease), functional bowel diseases (eg, irritable bowel syndrome), and secretion- and motility-related disorders.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Enhancing cannabinoid neurotransmission augments the extinction of conditioned fear.

The endogenous cannabinoid (eCB) system represents a major therapeutic target for the treatment of a variety of anxiety-related disorders. A recent study has demonstrated that pharmacologic or genetic disruption of CB1-receptor-mediated neurotransmission decreases the extinction of conditioned fear in mice. Here, we examined whether CB1 blockade would similarly disrupt extinction in rats, using fear-potentiated startle as a measure of conditioned fear. We also examined whether pharmacologic enhancement of CB1 activation would lead to enhancements in extinction. Our results indicate that systemic administration of the CB1 antagonist rimonabant (SR141716A) prior to extinction training led to significant, dose-dependent decreases in extinction. While the administration of the CB1 agonist WIN 55,212-2 did not appear to affect extinction, administration of AM404, an inhibitor of eCB breakdown and reuptake, led to dose-dependent enhancements in extinction. In addition to showing decreased fear 1 and 24 h after extinction training, AM404-treated animals showed decreased shock-induced reinstatement of fear. Control experiments demonstrated that the effects of AM404 could not be attributed to alterations in the expression of conditioned fear, locomotion, shock reactivity, or baseline startle, as these parameters seemed unchanged by AM404. Furthermore, coadministration of rimonabant with AM404 blocked this enhancement of extinction, suggesting that AM404 was acting to increase CB1 receptor activation during extinction training. These results demonstrate that the eCB system can be modulated to enhance emotional learning, and suggest that eCB modulators may be therapeutically useful as adjuncts for exposure-based psychotherapies such as those used to treat Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and other anxiety disorders.

Amygdala↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Calcium signaling and synaptic modulation: regulation of endocannabinoid-mediated synaptic modulation by calcium.

Postsynaptic Ca2+ signal influences synaptic transmission through multiple mechanisms. Some of them involve retrograde messengers that are released from postsynaptic neurons in a Ca2+-dependent manner and modulate transmitter release through activation of presynaptic receptors. Recent studies have revealed essential roles of endocannabinoids in retrograde modulation of synaptic transmission. Endocannabinoid release is induced by either postsynaptic Ca2+ elevation alone or activation of postsynaptic Gq/11-coupled receptors with or without Ca2+ elevation. The former pathway is independent of phospholipase Cbeta (PLCbeta) and requires a large Ca2+ elevation to a micromolar range. The latter pathway requires PLCbeta and is facilitated by a moderate Ca2+ elevation to a submicromolar range. This facilitation is caused by Ca2+-dependency of receptor-driven PLCbeta activation. The released endocannabinoids then activate presynaptic cannabinoid receptor type 1 (CB1), and suppress transmitter release from presynaptic terminals. Both CB1 receptors and Gq/11-coupled receptors are widely distributed in the brain. Thus, the endocannabinoid-mediated retrograde modulation may be an important and widespread mechanism in the brain, by which postsynaptic events including Gq/11-coupled receptor activation and Ca2+ elevation can retrogradely influence presynaptic function.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Independent presynaptic and postsynaptic mechanisms regulate endocannabinoid signaling at multiple synapses in the ventral tegmental area.

Dopamine (DA) neurons in the ventral tegmental area have been implicated in psychiatric disorders and drug abuse. Understanding the mechanisms through which their activity is regulated via the modulation of afferent input is imperative to understanding their roles in these conditions. Here we demonstrate that endocannabinoids liberated from DA neurons activate cannabinoid CB1 receptors located on glutamatergic axons and on GABAergic terminals targeting GABA(B) receptors located on these cells. Endocannabinoid release was initiated by inhibiting either presynaptic type-III metabotropic glutamate receptors or postsynaptic calcium-activated potassium channels, two conditions that also promote enhanced DA neuron excitability and bursting. Thus, activity-dependent release of endocannabinoids may act as a regulatory feedback mechanism to inhibit synaptic inputs in response to DA neuron bursting, thereby regulating firing patterns that may fine-tune DA release from afferent terminals.

Animals↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[The endocannabinoid system and food intake control].

Acylethanolamides are endogenous compounds with lipid structure including anandamide (AEA), palmitoilethanolamide, oleylamide and oleylethanolamide (OEA). AEA binds to the cannabinoid receptor CB1, located at the central nervous system, while OEA is an endogenous ligand for the alpha subtype of peroxisome-proliferator activating receptor (PPARalpha). Since AEA acts on the same receptor which binds marihuana active derivatives, this group of compounds were called endocannabinoids. Besides typical central effects of cannabinoids, CB1 receptor activation leads to hyperphagia, whereas its pharmacological blockade is followed by changes in energy metabolism favouring substrate oxidation. OEA has inhibitory effects on food intake by acting on PPARalpha receptors which modulate the autonomous nervous system. Both acylethanolamides, AEA and OEA, have opposite effects suggesting that they form part of a satiety sensor system. Whereas fasting triggers AEA release and inhibits OEA synthesis, eating has the reverse effect. Additionally OEA is also produced by adipocytes ad has some effects on lipid metabolism. All these data suggest a role for acylethanolamides and the endocannabinoid system in the pathophysiology of obesity, diabetes and atherosclerosis.

Adipocytes↗
PubMed2005

Food for thought: endocannabinoid modulation of lipogenesis.

An emerging body of evidence implicates peripheral and central endocannabinoid pathways in the regulation of feeding behavior and body weight. A report in this issue of the JCI demonstrates the presence of a common endocannabinoid-regulated molecular pathway for peripheral lipogenic and central appetitive regulation. This pathway involves the activation of the transcription factor SREBP-1c and its associated enzymes, acetyl-CoA carboxylase-1 and fatty acid synthase, in the liver and hypothalamus. Activation of cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB(1)) in liver plays a key role in increased serum lipid production, fatty liver, and possibly diet-induced obesity. Conversely, stimulation of these receptors in the hypothalamus may lead to an increase in food consumption. Thus, targeting both of these pathways with CB(1) antagonists could promote sustained weight loss and favorable serum lipid profiles in obese patients.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

Cardiovascular system effects of marijuana.

Marijuana and delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) increase heart rate, slightly increase supine blood pressure, and on occasion produce marked orthostatic hypotension. Cardiovascular effects in animals are different, with bradycardia and hypotension the most typical response. Cardiac output increases, and peripheral vascular resistance and maximum exercise performance decrease. Tolerance to most of the initial cardiovascular effects appears rapidly. With repeated exposure, supine blood pressure decreases slightly, orthostatic hypotension disappears, blood volume increases, heart rate slows, and circulatory responses to exercise and Valsalva maneuver are diminished, consistent with centrally mediated, reduced sympathetic, and enhanced parasympathetic activity. Receptor-mediated and probably nonneuronal sites of action account for cannabinoid effects. The endocannabinoid system appears important in the modulation of many vascular functions. Marijuana's cardiovascular effects are not associated with serious health problems for most young, healthy users, although occasional myocardial infarction, stroke, and other adverse cardiovascular events are reported. Marijuana smoking by people with cardiovascular disease poses health risks because of the consequences of the resulting increased cardiac work, increased catecholamine levels, carboxyhemoglobin, and postural hypotension.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Two distinct classes of muscarinic action on hippocampal inhibitory synapses: M2-mediated direct suppression and M1/M3-mediated indirect suppression through endocannabinoid signalling.

The cholinergic system in the CNS plays important roles in higher brain functions, primarily through muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. At cellular levels, muscarinic activation produces various effects including modulation of synaptic transmission. Here we report that muscarinic activation suppresses hippocampal inhibitory transmission through two distinct mechanisms, namely a cannabinoid-dependent and cannabinoid-independent mechanism. We made paired whole-cell recordings from cultured hippocampal neurons of rats and mice, and monitored inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSCs). When cannabinoid receptor type 1 (CB1) was blocked, oxotremorine M (oxo-M), a muscarinic agonist, suppressed IPSCs in a subset of neuron pairs. This suppression was associated with an increase in paired-pulse ratio, blocked by the M(2)-preferring antagonist gallamine, and was totally absent in neuron pairs from M(2)-knockout mice. When CB1 receptors were not blocked, oxo-M suppressed IPSCs in a gallamine-resistant manner in cannabinoid-sensitive pairs. This suppression was associated with an increase in paired-pulse ratio, blocked by the CB1 antagonist AM281, and was completely eliminated in neuron pairs from M(1)/M(3)-compound-knockout mice. Our immunohistochemical examination showed that M(2) and CB1 receptors were present at inhibitory presynaptic terminals of mostly different origins. These results indicate that two distinct mechanisms mediate the muscarinic suppression. In a subset of synapses, activation of M(2) receptors at presynaptic terminals suppresses GABA release directly. In contrast, in a different subset of synapses, activation of M(1)/M(3) receptors causes endocannabinoid production and subsequent suppression of GABA release by activating presynaptic CB1 receptors. Thus, the muscarinic system can influence hippocampal functions by controlling different subsets of inhibitory synapses through the two distinct mechanisms.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Metabolism of anandamide and 2-arachidonoylglycerol: an historical overview and some recent developments.

Anandamide (N-arachidonoylethanolamine) and 2-arachidonoylglycerol are the two endogenous agonists of cannabinoid receptors discovered to date. Like other eicosanoids, and unlike classical neuromodulators, these two compounds are synthesized by neurons on demand, i.e., their biosynthesis, rather than release, is stimulated by Ca2+ influx and cell membrane depolarization. Both endocannabinoids can be produced from membrane phosphoglycerides through the action of phospholipases, although de novo pathways have also been suggested. Once released by cells, the action of both anandamide and 2-arachidonoylglycerol is terminated--after their diffusion through the cell membrane--by the hydrolysis of the amide or ester bonds to yield arachidonic acid, which is then immediately reincorporated into phospholipids. One enzyme, fatty acid amide hydrolase, catalyzes the hydrolysis of both endocannabinoids in nervous and nonnervous cells. This enzyme also recognizes N-palmitoylethanolamine, an antiinflammatory congener of anandamide, with a catalytic efficiency that depends on the cell type under study. However, the existence of different isozymes with different affinity for anandamide and N-palmitoylethanolamine has not been investigated. Moreover, little work has been performed on the regulation of anandamide formation and breakdown, and several open questions remain as to the possible biosynthetic and degradative mechanisms of cannabimimetic 2-arachidonoylglycerol in nucleated blood cells such as macrophages. Finally, the co-existence of both endocannabinoids in invertebrates has not been fully established. Here we briefly review the state of the art, and present new data from our laboratory, on these four largely unexplored aspects of endocannabinoid metabolism.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

An endocannabinoid mechanism in relapse to drug seeking: a review of animal studies and clinical perspectives.

Detoxification from drug abuse is strongly threatened by the occurrence of renewed episodes of drug intake. In human addicts, relapse to drug seeking may take place even after a considerably long period from the last drug consumption. Over the last decade, the endocannabinoid system has received remarkable attention due to its unique features, including its rewarding properties closely resembling those of the most commonly abused substances and its multiple therapeutic implications. Although limited at present, evidence is now emerging on a possible participation of the endogenous cannabinoid system in the regulation of relapsing phenomena. Both stimulation and blockade of the central cannabinoid CB-sub1 receptor have proved to play an important role in drug- as well as in cue-induced reinstatement of drug seeking behavior. Indeed, while CB-sub1 receptor stimulation may elicit relapse not only to cannabinoid seeking but also to cocaine, heroin, alcohol and methamphetamine, this effect is significantly attenuated, when not fully prevented, by pretreatment with the CB-sub1 receptor antagonist rimonabant. However, corroborating data on the involvement of the cannabinoid system in stress-induced reinstatement are still rather scarce. The present review attempts to collect data obtained from different laboratories using diverse experimental approaches, to provide a comprehensive picture of the recent evidence of a relationship between the cannabinoid system and the neurobiological mechanisms leading to relapse. For each class of abused drugs, the conspicuous progress made in delineating the role of the endocannabinoid system in relapse to drug seeking has been examined by placing particular emphasis on the findings obtained from behavioral studies. After summarizing findings and implications emerging from the reviewed studies, we conclude by briefly discussing what information is still missing and how missing information might be obtained.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

The endogenous cannabinoid system and the treatment of marijuana dependence.

The active principle of marijuana, Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Delta9-THC), exerts its pharmacological effects by binding to selective receptors present on the membranes of neurons and other cells. These cannabinoid receptors are normally engaged by a family of lipid mediators, called endocannabinoids, which are thought to participate in the regulation of a diversity of brain functions, including pain, mood, appetite and memory. Marijuana use may lead to adaptive changes in endocannabinoid signaling, and these changes might contribute to effects of marijuana as well as to the establishment of marijuana dependence. In the present article, I outline current views on how endocannabinoid substances are produced, released, and deactivated in the brain. In addition, I review recent progress on the development of pharmacological agents that interfere with endocannabinoid deactivation and discuss their potential utility in the treatment of marijuana dependence and other aspects of drug abuse.

Animals↗