Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Basiliximab”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 451 records · Page 25Linked to original sources

Tailoring immunosuppressive therapy for renal transplant recipients.

During the past decade several new potent immunosuppressive agents with different modes of action and different side-effect profiles have become available. Nowadays immunosuppression after renal transplantation is no longer one single regimen applicable to all patients. In the selection of the optimal immunosuppressive protocol, individual drug-related toxicity, recipient-related risk factors as well as donor organ characteristics have to be taken into account. This article will give an overview of the most recently developed immunosuppressive agents available for clinical use. Their individual mode of action and their different efficacy and safety profile will be described as basis for selection of each of these drugs in an attempt to tailor the optimal therapeutic regimen for the individual patient both in terms of short-term and long-term outcome.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗

Epithelial cell polarity and improved early outcomes in delayed graft function: a pilot study of polyclonal vs monoclonal antibodies.

BACKGROUND: Polyclonal antibody preparations contain antibodies that bind not only to molecules on circulating lymphocytes but also to other sites that bear similar antigens. We hypothesized that this extra-antibody effect would increase the number of intact tubular epithelial cells in organs at high risk for delayed graft function (DGF). METHODS: We used immunohistochemistry to examine serial biopsy samples (time 0 and 7-10 days after transplantation) in 18 kidney transplant recipients with DGF. These individuals received either polyclonal rabbit antithymocyte sera or a monoclonal humanized anti-CD25 antibody as induction immunosuppression. We also examined their early clinical course over 6 months. RESULTS: Individuals treated with the polyclonal preparation demonstrated greater preservation of kidney epithelial cell polarity manifested by more intense and more localized basolateral distribution of E-cadherin (P = 0.016), beta-catenin (P = 0.008) and Na-K ATPase (P = 0.02). These individuals were also more likely to maintain greater estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFRs) at follow-up than patients treated with an anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody (6 month eGFR polyclonal: 55.5+/-7.12 ml/min vs monoclonal: 43.33+/-6.48 ml/min; P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Though a pilot study, these data suggest that a purified polyclonal antibody preparation may help conserve functional kidney mass during DGF with potential benefits on transplant function overall.

Adult↗

Pharmacokinetic of cyclosporine microemulsion in pediatric kidney recipients receiving A quadruple immunosuppressive regimen: the value of C2 blood levels.

BACKGROUND: The management of cyclosporine therapy in pediatric kidney-transplant recipients is largely based on single center's experience rather than on a univocal pharmacokinetic approach based on therapeutic drug monitoring. A prospective multicenter trial was designed to address the question whether C2 blood level monitoring of cyclosporine microemulsion therapy is feasible in the pediatric setting. METHODS: Sixty-four pediatric kidney-transplant recipients receiving a triple immunosuppressive regimen based on cyclosporine microemulsion had their cyclosporine dose adjusted to the same protocol-defined C2 targets from the time of the transplant until 2 years posttransplant. The interim analyses after 1 year of enrollment is presented in this study. RESULTS: One-year patient and graft survival were 100% and 94.8%, respectively. One-year rejection rate was 15%. C2 management of cyclosporine did not affect graft function: 1-year serum creatinine and glomerular filtration rate were 1.3+/-1 mg/mL and 71.2+/-20 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively. C2 was the best single-point predictor of the area under the concentration curve throughout the entire follow-up, with a mean coefficient of correlation of 0.97+/-0.01. CONCLUSIONS: C2 management of cyclosporine microemulsion therapy is effective and safe in pediatric kidney-transplant recipients given a combined immunosuppressive treatment.

Adolescent↗

Clinicopathological evaluation of renal allograft treated with anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody.

Twenty-seven living-donor kidney recipients were treated with the antibody against CD25 as the induction immunosuppressive agent. They did not develop acute rejection within 1 month after transplantation, and mean serum creatinine level at 1 month was 1.0 +/- 0.4 mg/dL. There were no findings of acute rejection or drug-induced nephrotoxicity in protocol biopsies at 1 month following transplantation. After 1 month had passed, acute rejection occurred in three cases. The pathological grade of acute rejection varied from borderline to grade III by Banff classification. The careful inspection is necessary to find out the occurrences of acute rejection more than 2 months after transplantation because immunological situation has been changing around this period.

Acute Disease↗

Use of IL-2 receptor antagonists to reduce delayed graft function following renal transplantation: a review.

Delayed graft function (DGF) occurs in approximately 30% of renal transplant patients, and significantly increases risk of long-term graft loss. This article reviews the potential for use of interleukin-2 receptor (IL-2R) antagonists to reduce the burden of DGF. IL-2R antagonists decrease incidence of acute rejection without increasing risk of cytomegalovirus infection or malignancy, and show equivalent efficacy to lymphocyte-depleting antibody agents in standard risk patients with immediate graft function. The nephrotoxicity associated with calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) has led to use of delayed or low-dose CNI regimens with induction therapy in patients with DGF. In this setting, use of an IL-2R antagonist with mycophenolate mofetil and steroids with delayed cyclosporine appears to be associated with a low incidence of biopsy-proven rejection and comparable renal function to patients with immediate function. Additionally, there is intriguing evidence to suggests that IL-2R antagonists may reduce risk of DGF occurring. A number of large-scale and smaller studies have reported a trend to reduced incidence of DGF or improved early renal function using IL-2R antagonists compared with placebo, although data are not entirely consistent. In conclusion, the ability of IL-2R antagonists to reduce acute rejection with no additional safety concerns makes them an attractive option for patients with DGF.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗

Anti-IL-2 receptor antibody vs. polyclonal anti-lymphocyte antibody as induction therapy in pediatric transplantation.

Current concerns in pediatric transplantation focus on chronic rejection which commonly leads to graft loss, and on long-term maintenance immunosuppression toxicity. Acute rejection has been associated with the subsequent development of chronic rejection. Therefore, induction therapy may provide potential benefits by preventing early acute rejection episodes and allowing delayed administration of calcineurin inhibitors or steroid avoidance. This review of the literature showed that induction therapy can reduce early and recurrent acute rejection episodes after pediatric solid organ transplantation. Whether this might result in better long-term graft survival has still to be confirmed. However, induction therapy has beneficial effects in high-risk recipients and allows steroid avoidance or calcineurin inhibitor minimization. Because they are very well tolerated, anti-IL-2 receptor antibodies are increasingly preferred to rabbit-antithymocyte globulin, but the former have not yet been proven to be more effective or to have less late toxicity than polyclonal agents. Benefits in early outcome and no increase in adverse events lead to recommend the use of IL-2 receptor antagonists as induction therapy after pediatric organ transplantation.

Adolescent↗

Pinpoint targeted immunosuppression: anti-CD20/MMF desensitization with anti-CD25 in successful ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation without splenectomy.

BACKGROUND: In Japan, ABO-incompatible (ABO-I) kidney transplantation began in 1989; these transplantations have flourished because of the lack of cadaveric donors, and more than 600 cases were performed up to 2004. Splenectomy has been considered to be necessary for successful ABO-I kidney transplantation, and the majority of pre-conditioning protocols include splenectomy in Japan. However, we have lost some grafts due to antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) accompanying explosive elevation of anti-A/B antibody (Ab) titer even though the patients had a low pre-operative Ab titer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We utilized two doses of anti-CD20, rituximab, simply combined with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/low-dose steroid desensitization started 1 month before surgery in ABO-I kidney transplantation. Two sessions of pre-operative Ab removal by double filtration plasmapheresis or plasma exchange were carried out. We performed six ABO-I kidney transplantations without splenectomy. Anti-A/B Ab titers were more than 16 to 32 times before treatment. We did not plan any post-operative repeated Ab removal or intravenous immunoglobulin G (IVIG). RESULTS: Pre-operative anti-A/B Ab titers were successfully reduced to less than eight times in all cases. Except for one case in which we had to remove the graft due to aspiration pneumonia and methicillin-resistant staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE) sepsis, the other five cases did not experience antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). An additional session of post-operative Ab removal and/or IVIG was not necessary. In all patients, B cells (CD19+, CD20+, CD21+) and activated T cells (CD25+) were selectively suppressed, although CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+ cell populations remained stable, thus we call our protocol "pinpoint targeted immunosuppression." Plasma immunoglobulin level was also successfully suppressed, especially after 6 weeks of surgery. CONCLUSION: Anti-CD20/MMF desensitization is safe and allows successful ABO-I kidney transplantation without splenectomy.

ABO Blood-Group System↗

A multicenter pilot study of early (4-day) steroid cessation in renal transplant recipients under simulect, tacrolimus and sirolimus.

This study presents the first prospective multicenter study assessing sirolimus-based immunosuppression with early (4-day) corticosteroid withdrawal (CSWD) in renal transplantation. Immunosuppression included: anti-IL-2 receptor antibody and tacrolimus/sirolimus. Inclusion criteria included adult primary recipients. Exclusion criteria included: (i) African Americans, (ii) current PRA >50%, (iii) multiple organ transplants, (iv) WBC < 3000 cells/microL and (v) fasting hypercholesterolemia/hypertriglyceridemia. The primary endpoints were acute rejection and the proportion of patients off corticosteroids. Seventy-seven patients were enrolled: mean age of 49.7 +/- 12 years. Transplants included: cadaveric (26%) and living donor (74%). Patient and graft survival were 100%. Biopsy proven acute rejection occurred in 13%; presumptive rejection in 10.5%. Banff grades included: IA (seven patients), IB (one patient), IIA (one patient) and IIB (one patient). Renal function at 1 year: serum creatinine (1.18 +/- 0.06 mg/dL). Mean weight gain was minimal at 1 year: 3 +/- 2 kg/patient. Mild increases in total, LDL and HDL cholesterol were observed and new antilipid agent use occurred in 26 patients. In conclusion, early CSWD under tacrolimus/sirolimus-based immunosuppression in selected, low-risk renal transplant recipients provides: (i) excellent patient and graft survival, (ii) good renal function, (iii) reduced hyperlipidemia and antilipid agent use and (iv) low acute rejection rates.

Adrenal Cortex Hormones↗

Is the determination of the soluble interleukin-2 receptor after application of interleukin-2 receptor antibodies still appropriate for immunological monitoring after renal transplantation?

INTRODUCTION: The use of monoclonal antibodies against the alpha-chain of the membrane-bound interleukin-2 receptor (IL-2Ralpha) as immune suppressants causes characteristic changes in the levels of soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL-2R) in serum and urine. METHODS: 38 kidney transplant patients were included in this study. 28 of them received an induction therapy with the IL-2R antibody basiliximax (Simulect) in addition to standard immunosuppression, 10 patients constituted the control group. RESULTS: Time courses of sIL-2R levels of Simulect patients with and without complications after transplantation have been compared. It turned out that of a total of 18 cases with complications 15 cases could be identified by their elevated sIL-2R levels, which corresponds to a sensitivity of 83%. CONCLUSION: Acute rejection, CMV infection, extrarenal bacterial infection and pyelonephritis in the transplant all cause a significant increase of the sIL-2R level even after application of Simulect.

Adult↗

Living donor islet transplantation, the alternative approach to overcome the obstacles limiting transplant.

We performed the world's first successful living donor islet transplantation for unstable diabetes. A total of 408,114 islet equivalents were isolated from half a living pancreas and transplanted immediately to the recipient who was a 27-year-old female. The donor was a 56-year-old female in good health, mother of the recipient. The islets functioned immediately, and the recipient was weaned completely from insulin on the 22nd posttransplant day, and has maintained excellent glycemic control since. The donor was discharged on the 18th postoperative day with normal oral glucose tolerance test and without complications. Living donor islet transplantation could cure one insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus patients with a single donor. There are some advantages in the living donor islet transplantation: (a) living donor can alleviate the issue of donor shortage; (b) highly potent islets can be isolated from a living donor; and (c) the recipient can be treated with immunosuppressant and controlled blood glucose level tightly prior to the transplantation. These are important factors in overcoming the obstacles limiting islet transplantation. We believe that the living donor islet transplantation may become an additional option in treating insulin-dependent diabetes.

Adult↗

Acute rejection after heart transplantation.

Acute rejection (AR) seems to be less common with current immunosuppressive strategies; however, it remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the first year following heart transplantation. Despite great interest in noninvasive methods for detecting rejection, the endomyocardial biopsy remains the standard method for AR identification and, recently, the cardiac biopsy grading system has been reviewed. Moreover, the availability of several immunosuppressive drug combinations has generated confusion in the minds of clinicians. This review will focus on recently published studies that are related to the clinical impact of AR, combination regimens of chronic maintenance immunosuppression and specific therapeutic options for treating AR.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗

Rabbit antithymocyte globulin induction therapy in adult renal transplantation.

Rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) and horse antithymocyte globulin (horse ATG) are the polyclonal antithymocyte agents available for use in solid organ transplantation in the United States. Horse ATG is indicated for induction immunosuppression and for treatment of acute rejection episodes after kidney transplantation; rATG is indicated for treatment of acute rejection only. However, rATG is commonly used in clinical practice as an induction immunosuppressive agent, instigating many questions regarding appropriate dosing, tolerability, safety, and efficacy. Available evidence supports the use of rATG as an induction agent in adult renal transplant recipients. The use of this product for induction therapy has been studied in conjunction with a full-dose, triple-therapy maintenance regimen (sequential quadruple immunosuppression) consisting of a calcineurin inhibitor, an antimetabolite, and corticosteroids. Rabbit ATG has a proven safety and efficacy profile both as treatment of acute rejection and as induction therapy in patients undergoing kidney transplantation. The most common adverse events associated with rATG are cytokine release syndrome, thrombocytopenia, and lymphopenia. Results of early studies showed an increased rate of cytomegalovirus disease associated with rATG treatment, but recent studies indicate that routine administration of modern antiviral prophylaxis can reduce this risk. Current practice with rATG is evolving to minimize lifelong exposure to calcineurin inhibitors and corticosteroids.

Adult↗

Single-agent immunosuppression after liver transplantation: what is possible?

Orthotopic liver transplantation is a life saving and life enhancing procedure. The development of immunosuppressive drugs has contributed to the high rate of success in terms of both patient and graft survival. However, the considerable adverse effects of these therapies are affecting long-term outcomes of transplant recipients. Complications related to immunosuppression are responsible for the majority of deaths in patients surviving more than 1 year. Therefore, the search for an optimal immunosuppressive regimen has become of paramount importance. The liver has proved to be an 'immunologically privileged' organ, capable in several animal models to be accepted as an allograft without any intervention on the immune system of the recipient. In some human liver allografts acceptance of the new organ is recognised after withdrawal of immunosuppressants, but prior identification of such individuals is not yet possible, thus negating this management option. Graft-recipient interaction is peculiar in liver transplantation: acute cellular rejection does not always need to be treated, and if it is not severe, appears to be associated with a better survival of both patient and graft. In the last decade there has been an evolution of immunosuppressive protocols, driven by empirical observation and a deeper understanding of immunological events after transplant. However, most modifications have been made because of the necessity to reduce long-term drug related morbidity and mortality. Withdrawal of corticosteroids has proven to be safely achievable in most patients, with no deleterious effects on patient or graft survival but with a great benefit in terms of reduction of incidence of metabolic and cardiovascular complications. Long-term 'steroid-free' regimens are therefore now widely used. Patients with stable graft function can be easily maintained using a single drug usually after 6 or 12 months and usually with a calcineurin inhibitor. The more evolved step of using monotherapy ab initio has also proven to be effective in a few studies and needs to be explored further. In the future new strategies will be designed to help the development of tolerance of the allograft, selectively stimulating instead of suppressing the immune reaction of the recipient.

Adrenal Cortex Hormones↗