Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Vomiting”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 433 records · Page 24Linked to original sources

A prospective randomized blinded study of the effect of intravenous fluid therapy on postoperative nausea and vomiting in children undergoing strabismus surgery.

BACKGROUND: Nausea and vomiting is a common postoperative complication that often necessitates the use of antiemetic agents. METHODS: In a prospective, randomized, double blind trial, the effect of perioperative fluid administration on postoperative adverse outcomes following anesthesia was studied. One hundred children undergoing strabismus repair were randomly assigned to receive 10 ml x kg(-1) x h(-1) (control group) or 30 ml x kg(-1) x h(-1) (superhydration group) of lactated Ringer's solution during the operation. During the first 24 h postoperatively, nausea and vomiting, thirst, pain, and fever were evaluated. RESULTS: Groups were similar with respect to demographic data, surgical procedures and baseline hemodynamic variables. In the first 24 h postoperatively, nausea and vomiting occurred in 27 patients (54%) of the control group and 11 (22%) of patients in the superhydration group (P = 0.001). Comparison of the superhydration group with the control group also showed a statistically significant benefit of superhydration on postoperative thirst (P = 0.0002) and fever (P = 0.02). The differences in nausea and vomiting, thirst, and fever remained significant after adjustment for age, gender, weight, and duration of surgery. There was no significant difference between the two groups in postoperative pain. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous superhydration administration is an inexpensive and safe therapy for reducing postoperative nausea and vomiting and discomfort.

Child, Preschool↗

The impact of nausea and vomiting on women: a burden of early pregnancy.

Nausea and vomiting are troublesome symptoms occurring in the first trimester of pregnancy. The aim of this study was to describe the impact these symptoms have on women in early pregnancy by interviewing, using a structured questionnaire, 593 pregnant women presenting with nausea and vomiting in the first trimester of pregnancy. The women were asked to complete the Rhodes index of nausea and vomiting and the MOS 36 Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). Symptoms of nausea and vomiting started early in pregnancy. Nausea was the most troublesome symptom experienced by women, both in its duration and intensity. Low scores for the SF-36 were found for all items, particularly physical functioning, energy and social functioning. The women described substantial effects on working, household duties and parenting activities. Findings from this study suggest nausea and vomiting in early pregnancy has a profound impact on women's general sense of well-being and day to day life activities.

Activities of Daily Living↗

Variables related to nausea and vomiting during pregnancy.

Seventy to 90 percent of all pregnant women experience nausea, and 50 percent have at least one episode of vomiting or retching. A continuous measure was used to quantify symptoms of nausea with or without vomiting or retching during pregnancy in 126 women. Relationships between symptoms and selected variables were evaluated. Nausea with or without vomiting or retching was associated with maternal age, occupation, parity, cigarette smoking, infant gender, and the personality trait of independence. Significant associations were entered into multiple regression equations. Fourteen percent of the variation in symptoms overall, 25.1 percent of the variation in nausea symptoms, and 16.6 percent of the variation in vomiting or retching symptoms were explained by a combination of these selected independent variables. Although this study found associations, independent variables contributed little to predicting or explaining the presence and severity of nausea and vomiting during pregnancy. More sensitive measures and evaluation are required to understand and treat this perplexing phenomenon.

Female↗

Cyclic vomiting syndrome in adults: clinical features and response to tricyclic antidepressants.

OBJECTIVE: Cyclic vomiting syndrome (CVS) has been described infrequently in adults, and treatment in both children and adults remains unsatisfactory. We report clinical features of a group of adults with CVS and anecdotal outcome from open-label treatment with tricyclic antidepressants, medications that have some efficacy in other unexplained gastrointestinal disorders. METHODS: Clinical data were examined from 17 adult patients with CVS seen over a 10-yr period, each having been treated with a tricyclic antidepressant. Outpatient records were reviewed, clinical outcome was extracted using a priori criteria, and findings were compared with 37 patients having usual functional nausea and vomiting who also received tricyclic antidepressant therapy. RESULTS: Symptoms in CVS began at age 35 yr (range 14-73 yr); the average episode length was 6 days (range 1-21 days) and the symptom-free interval averaged 3.1 months (range 0.5-6 months). Vomiting cycles typically began without warning, and fewer than one-third of the subjects reported a prodrome or potential trigger event, such as menstrual periods, pregnancy, or large meals. Sleep was seemingly beneficial in 23.5%. Tricyclic antidepressant therapy was associated with complete remission in 17.6% and partial response in 58.8%, but was less effective than for functional nausea and vomiting (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: CVS is a rare diagnosis with distinctive features in adults. Duration of episodes and cycles varies considerably across subjects. In open-label, uncontrolled use, tricyclic antidepressants appear beneficial for some subjects but are less effective in CVS than in chronic, persistent functional nausea and vomiting.

Adolescent↗

Similarities in cyclic vomiting syndrome across age groups.

OBJECTIVE: Cyclic vomiting syndrome is well recognized in children yet has poorly defined pathogenesis and treatment. Cyclic vomiting syndrome is occasionally diagnosed in older subjects, but little attempt has been made to determine if such cases represent a unique disorder. METHODS: We reviewed clinical data from 39 patients aged 1.8-75 yr with cyclic vomiting syndrome meeting published criteria for diagnosis. Clinical characteristics were compared between subjects with symptom onset in childhood (<12 yr, n = 18) and subjects with onset at an older age (> or =12 yr, n = 21; mean age at onset 34.8+/-3.8 yr). RESULTS: All patients had stereotypical episodes of vomiting separated by varying symptom-free intervals. The prevalence rates of prodromal symptoms, triggering events, alleviants, associated symptoms including abdominal pain and diarrhea, and past or family history of migraine were similar in the children and older subjects with the syndrome (p > 0.3 for each). Delay in diagnosis was greater in the older subset (3.1+/-0.8 yr vs 7.9+/-3.1 yr, p < 0.05). Interepisode intervals and total number of hospitalizations did not differ significantly between younger and older patients, but duration of episodes was significantly longer in the older group (2.0+/-0.5 days vs 3.8+/-0.4 days, p < 0.01). When subjects were further substratified by age of illness onset, duration of episodes progressively increased from infant/toddlers (1.8+/-0.4 days) through childhood (2.3+/-0.5 days) and adolescence (2.9+/-1.0 days) and into adulthood (3.9+/-0.5; p < 0.05 across groups). Episode duration did not lengthen further in subgroups >20 yr of age. CONCLUSIONS: Many characteristics of cyclic vomiting syndrome are similar irrespective of age at disorder onset, suggesting a uniform pathogenesis. Duration of episodes increases with age to age 20 yr. Increased awareness of the condition and a high index of suspicion may help decrease delay in diagnosis after symptom onset.

Adolescent↗

Associations between self-induced vomiting and personality disorder in patients with a history of anorexia nervosa.

Fifty-five patients of an eating disorders service with a history of anorexia nervosa (AN), defined by a history of refusal to maintain body weight above a level of 15% below that expected, completed a modified version of the revised Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire (PDQ-R) based on DSM-III-R personality disorders (PD). The subjects were divided into 2 groups based on AN subtypes: vomiters, defined by a history of self-induced vomiting, and non-vomiters, who had maintained low weight mainly or only by diet +/- excessive exercise. Vomiters showed significantly higher scores on self-report measures of borderline and antisocial PD criteria. Discriminant analysis based on PD scores for all 13 DSM-III-R PD categories correctly predicted AN subtype membership based on vomiting history in 85.5% of patients. The implications of PD comorbidity for the development and management of eating disorders are discussed.

Adolescent↗

Acupuncture and acupressure for the management of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.

PURPOSE: To review existing research, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) consensus statement, and federal regulations regarding the use of acupuncture and acupressure in the management of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in order to give nurse practitioners (NPs) the information they need to provide the best care for patients undergoing chemotherapy treatment for cancer. DATA SOURCES: Selected scientific literature and Internet sources. CONCLUSIONS: Research supports the effectiveness of acupuncture and acupressure for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Used in conjunction with current antiemetic drugs, acupuncture and acupressure have been shown to be safe and effective for relief of the nausea and vomiting resulting from chemotherapy. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Even with the best antiemetic pharmacological agents, 60% of cancer patients continue to experience nausea and vomiting when undergoing chemotherapy treatments. Because the NIH supports the use of acupuncture for nausea and vomiting, the NP is obligated to be knowledgeable about the use of these and other effective complementary treatments in order to provide the best care.

Acupressure↗

Ramosetron compared with granisetron for the prevention of vomiting following strabismus surgery in children.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Postoperative vomiting occurs frequently after strabismus surgery in children. Granisetron, a selective 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 receptor antagonist, is effective for the prevention of vomiting following paediatric strabismus surgery. Ramosetron, another new antagonist of 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 receptor, has more potent and longer acting properties than granisetron against cisplatin induced emesis. This study was undertaken to compare the efficacy and safety of granisetron and ramosetron for the prevention of vomiting following strabismus surgery in children. METHODS: In a randomised, double blinded manner 80 children, aged 4-10 years, received intravenously granisetron 40 microg/kg or ramosetron 6 microg/kg (n=40 each) at the end of surgery. A standard general anaesthetic technique and postoperative analgesia were used. Emetic episodes and safety assessment were performed during the first 24 hours and the next 24 hours after anaesthesia. RESULTS: The percentage of patients who were emesis free during 0-24 hours after anaesthesia was 85% with granisetron and 90% with ramosetron, respectively (p = 0.369); the corresponding rate during 24-48 hours after anaesthesia was 70% and 95% (p = 0.003). No clinically serious adverse events caused by the study drug were observed in any of the groups. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic antiemetic therapy with ramosetron is comparable with granisetron for the prevention of vomiting during 0-24 hours after anaesthesia in children undergoing strabismus surgery. During 24-48 hours after anaesthesia, ramosetron is more effective than granisetron for prophylaxis against postoperative vomiting.

Analysis of Variance↗

Is vomiting during pregnancy teratogenic?

The possibility that antiemetics used during pregnancy are teratogenic has been hotly debated; the effect of vomiting itself, however, has been largely ignored. The relation between vomiting and congenital malformations was examined in a prospective study of 16398 women who registered for prenatal care at or before 20 weeks' gestation. The odds ratios for malformations among women who vomited compared with women who did not were 1.14 for major malformations (p = 0.13), 0.88 for deformations (p = 0.39), 1.03 for hernias or undescended testes (p = 0.82), 1.06 for any of these three conditions (p = 0.38), 1.09 for minor anomalies (p = 0.14), and 1.10 for any anomaly (p = 0.03). After adjustment for use of antiemetics and five other confounding variables vomiting was not associated with a significantly increased risk of any of the above malformations. These data suggest that the increased risk, if any, among women receiving antiemetics during pregnancy is due to the drugs, not the vomiting.

Abnormalities, Drug-Induced↗

Denial of effective treatment and poor quality of clinical information in placebo controlled trials of ondansetron for postoperative nausea and vomiting: a review of published trials.

OBJECTIVE: To determine how many patients were deprived of treatment by being given placebo as comparator in trials of ondansetron for postoperative nausea and vomiting. DESIGN: Review of published trials of ondansetron during 1991 to July 1994. SETTING: Medline search in a university department of anaesthesia. SUBJECTS: 8806 patients who had been included in 18 indexed placebo controlled trials of ondansetron as prophylaxis against or treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting. RESULTS: Five studies (1236 patients) had been published by July 1992. All were placebo controlled trials. By July 1994, 8806 patients had been included in 18 indexed placebo controlled studies of prophylaxis or treatment. Only 462 patients had been in studies that compared ondansetron with other drugs, and there were no indexed comparative trials of treatment of nausea and vomiting. Roughly 2180 patients had been given placebo as prophylaxis and 440 had been given placebo when already experiencing postoperative nausea or vomiting. CONCLUSIONS: Around 2620 patients in the reviewed studies were denied existing drugs, which, though not completely effective or without side effects, do bring some relief from postoperative nausea and vomiting. Drug regulatory bodies should collaborate with drug companies to ensure better comparison of new with established drugs. This would avoid placebos being given to more than the fewest patients necessary to confirm effect and would allow doctors to be informed more quickly about relative efficacies.

Anesthesia Department, Hospital↗

A quantitative systematic review of ondansetron in treatment of established postoperative nausea and vomiting.

OBJECTIVES: To test the evidence for a dose-response with ondansetron for treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting and to establish whether differences in efficacy between doses are of clinical relevance. DESIGN: Quantitative systematic review of published randomised controlled trials. DATA SOURCES: Seven trials from 1991 to January 1996 retrieved from a systematic literature search (Medline, reference lists, hand searching of anaesthetic journals, manufacturer's database); no restriction on language. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Estimation of efficacy (incidence of complete control of further nausea and vomiting) by using odds ratios and the "number needed to treat" method for early (within 6 hours of administration) and late (within 24 hours) periods. RESULTS: Four placebo controlled trials with 1043 patients studied intravenous ondansetron 1 mg, 4 mg, or 8 mg. All doses were more efficacious than placebo in preventing further episodes of nausea or vomiting. For combined data, the point estimates for the number needed to treat were between 3.1 (8 mg) and 3.8 (1 mg) for early efficacy and between 4.1 (8 mg) and 4.8 (1 mg) for late efficacy, without significant differences between doses. No difference was found between ondansetron and droperidol in two trials with 129 patients or between ondansetron and metoclopramide in one trial with 80 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Further nausea and vomiting could be prevented with ondansetron compared with placebo in 25% of patients who had nausea or vomiting (number needed to treat, about 4). There was no evidence of a clinically relevant dose-response between 1 mg and 8 mg or a difference between ondansetron and either droperidol or metoclopramide in a limited dataset. A false impression of ondansetron's efficacy may arise because a quarter of all relevant published reports are duplicates, and reporting of study results is uncritical.

Antiemetics↗

Prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting by metoclopramide combined with dexamethasone: randomised double blind multicentre trial.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether 10 mg, 25 mg, or 50 mg metoclopramide combined with 8 mg dexamethasone, given intraoperatively, is more effective in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting than 8 mg dexamethasone alone, and to assess benefit in relation to adverse drug reactions. DESIGN: Four-armed, parallel group, double blind, randomised controlled clinical trial. SETTING: Four clinics of a university hospital and four district hospitals in Germany. PARTICIPANTS: 3140 patients who received balanced or regional anaesthesia during surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Postoperative nausea and vomiting within 24 hours of surgery (primary end point); occurrence of adverse reactions. RESULTS: Cumulative incidences (95% confidence intervals) of postoperative nausea and vomiting were 23.1% (20.2% to 26.0%), 20.6% (17.8% to 23.4%), 17.2% (14.6% to 19.8%), and 14.5% (12.0% to 17.0%) for 0 mg, 10 mg, 25 mg, and 50 mg metoclopramide. In the secondary analysis, 25 mg and 50 mg metoclopramide were equally effective at preventing early nausea (0-12 hours), but only 50 mg reduced late nausea and vomiting (> 12 hours). The most frequent adverse drug reactions were hypotension and tachycardia, with cumulative incidences of 8.8% (6.8% to 10.8%), 11.2% (9.0% to 13.4%), 12.9% (10.5% to 15.3%), and 17.9% (15.2% to 20.6%) for 0 mg, 10 mg, 25 mg, and 50 mg metoclopramide. CONCLUSION: The addition of 50 mg metoclopramide to 8 mg dexamethasone (given intraoperatively) is an effective, safe, and cheap way to prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting. A reduced dose of 25 mg metoclopramide intraoperatively, with additional postoperative prophylaxis in high risk patients, may be equally effective and cause fewer adverse drug reactions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN31625370 [controlled-trials.com].

Adult↗

Intractable vomiting due to a brainstem lesion in the absence of neurological signs or raised intracranial pressure.

The case of a 30 year old man who was believed to have a gastrointestinal motility disorder causing his chronic vomiting is reported. He had been well until 21 months previously when he had developed recurrent vomiting which would occur up to 10 times in a 24 hour period. Vomiting was not precipitated by eating and was not associated with any other symptoms. He had lost 25 kg in weight. A psychiatric assessment did not reveal a psychogenic cause for his vomiting. A brainstem magnetic resonance imaging scan revealed an area of low signal in the low midbrain just above the pons to the left of the midline. After gadolinium contrast injection the area enhanced. There was little or no mass effect, that is minimal displacement of normal structures, and minimal oedema. The appearance was that of a low grade or early brainstem tumour. There were no features of haemorrhage or infarct. The patient was managed with oral dexamethasone, resulting in prompt resolution of his symptoms. A search for a central neurological cause is recommended in a patient with unexplained persistent vomiting, even in the absence of other features to suggest a neurological problem. Autonomic function testing may provide additional information.

Adult↗

Comparison of gastrointestinal responses to CCK-8 and associated with vomiting.

The gastrointestinal motor and myoelectric responses associated with vomiting induced by apomorphine (APO) and activated by cholecystokinin octapeptide (CCK-8) were compared as well as the mechanisms of initiation of these responses. Twelve dogs were surgically implanted with strain-gauge force transducers or bipolar electrodes for chronic recording of contractile or electrical activity. The responses to CCK-8 were determined in the fasted state and compared with the gastrointestinal motor and myoelectric correlates of vomiting activated by APO. After recording control responses, the effects of the following agents on these responses were determined: atropine, domperidone, and proglumide. In addition, the effects of supradiaphragmatic vagotomy or splanchnicectomy were determined. We found that CCK-8 activated contractile and myoelectric responses in the absence of vomiting, which were similar in most respects to those found in association with vomiting. These responses included 1) the retrograde giant contraction (RGC) and 2) the post-RGC phasic contractions. These RGCs were similar with respect to their activation in an all-or-none fashion, magnitude, duration, and position in the small intestine. The myoelectric correlates of these motor responses were similar qualitatively and quantitatively. The responses activated by APO and CCK-8 differed with respect to their coordination at different levels of the gastrointestinal tract. Whether activated by CCK-8 or APO, atropine blocked the RGC but not the post-RGC contractions. Domperidone blocked all responses to APO but not to CCK-8, and splanchnicectomy did not affect responses to either agent. Vagotomy blocked all gastrointestinal responses to APO but not to CCK-8. These results indicated that CCK-8 activates the gastrointestinal motor and myoelectric correlates of vomiting by a peripheral mechanism that does not include dopamine receptors.

Animals↗

Ictal vomiting in partial seizures of temporal lobe origin.

We report 3 cases presenting ictal vomiting during partial seizures of temporal lobe origin. Two patients had complex partial seizures accompanying vomiting characteristics. Ictal vomiting occurred early in the course of the seizure when rhythmic discharges involved predominantly the left hemisphere, the language dominance hemisphere. The other patient had ictal vomiting in simple partial seizures which originated from the right temporal lobe or the language nondominant side. All 3 patients underwent anterior temporal lobectomy with promising outcomes. Pathologic diagnosis included hippocampal sclerosis in 2 patients and astrocytoma in 1 patient. In our patients, ictal vomiting does not lateralize temporal lobe epilepsy and is not specific to pathology.

Adolescent↗

Antiemetic efficacy of an oral suspension of granisetron plus dexamethasone and influence of quality of life on risk for nausea and vomiting.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the antiemetic efficacy of an oral suspension of granisetron/dexamethasone in patients receiving chemotherapy and to determine whether quality-of-life parameters influence the risk for postchemotherapy nausea and vomiting (PCNV). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In an open monocentric study, an oral suspension containing 2 mg granisetron and 16 mg (4 mg for moderately emetogenic chemotherapy) dexamethasone was administered to 43 chemotherapy-naive patients before highly (n = 16) or moderately (n = 27) emetogenic chemotherapy and on the 3 subsequent days (2 for moderately emetogenic chemotherapy). Emetic episodes were recorded and quality of life was assessed prior to each cycle with a questionnaire based on EORTC QLQ-30. RESULTS: In the group undergoing highly (moderately) emetogenic chemotherapy, complete control of acute vomiting was achieved in 60-72.7% (92.6-95.0%), and complete control of delayed vomiting in 37.5-40.0% (75.0-92.2%), of patients within the first 3 (5) cycles. The following quality-of-life parameters were significantly associated with PCNV: tiredness (RR = 1.3, p < 0.05), pain (RR = 1.5), impairment of daily life by pain (RR = 1.7), sensation of abdominal pressure and fullness (RR = 2.5), impairment of social activities (RR = 2.9). CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily oral administration of a suspension of granisetron/dexamethasone is an active prophylaxis of nausea and vomiting and compares favorably with data reported on intravenous administration. Quality-of-life parameters assessed pre-treatment could help to identify patients at high risk for nausea and vomiting so that antiemetic therapy can be tailored to individual patient risk.

Administration, Oral↗

Intracranial tumors. Vomiting as a presenting sign. A gastroenterologist's perspective.

Vomiting is seen as a symptom in patients with brain tumors, but it rarely leads to the diagnosis in the absence of a recognized neurologic deficit. Five patients were referred to a pediatric gastroenterologist for outpatient evaluation of persistent vomiting and were subsequently found to have an intracranial mass lesion. The paucity of neurologic findings and the absence of headaches in most of these patients caused the referring physicians to focus on the gastrointestinal tract and not the central nervous system as the cause of the patients' vomiting. The pathophysiology of vomiting and evaluation of these patients is discussed; recognizable patterns of vomiting in these patients are described.

Astrocytoma↗

Speed of eating as a determinant of bulimic desire to vomit: a controlled study.

Studies of self-induced vomiting of retarded persons have found that the rate of eating and the amount eaten alter this problem. The present study attempted to determine whether this same relation was exhibited by the nonretarded bulimic. A nonretarded bulimic woman provided her subjective ratings of her desire to vomit after eating her taboo foods at a fast versus slowed versus normal rate using a within participant experimental design. The desire to vomit was found to be near absent after the slowed eating of the taboo foods but was at a high level that endured after the rapid or normal eating. These results suggest a neglected determinant of adult bulimia that may be used in clinical treatment, pending confirmation by a larger sample with measures of actual vomiting as was previously evidenced by the inpatient retarded vomiters.

Adult↗