Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Trials”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 433 records · Page 24Linked to original sources
PubMed1997

International clinical trials of HIV vaccines: I. Phase I trial of an HIV-1 synthetic peptide vaccine in Bangkok, Thailand.

A randomized, double blind, placebo controlled Phase I trial of a prototype human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) synthetic peptide vaccine was conducted in Bangkok, Thailand, to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of the vaccine in a population of healthy adults at low risk for HIV infection, and to establish essential infrastructure for future HIV vaccine trials in Thailand. Thirty volunteers (25 males; 5 females) were recruited and randomized into 3 groups, receiving 3 intramuscular injections of either 100 micrograms vaccine (N = 12) or 500 micrograms vaccine (N = 12) or alum placebo (N = 6) on weeks 0, 4 and 25. The vaccine was well tolerated without any serious adverse effects. HIV-1 specific ELISA responses were detected in 20/24 subjects who received the vaccine, with V3 binding antibody titers ranging from 1:69 to 1:5,041. HIV-1 (MN) specific neutralizing antibody was detected in 19/20 of subjects with detectable HIV-1 specific binding antibody. Neutralization titers ranged from 1:14 to 1:1,294, which were less than titers observed in HIV-infected subjects. The results of this study indicate that the vaccine was well tolerated, and that the vaccine stimulated anti-HIV humoral immune responses in Thai subjects. The successful undertaking of this first HIV vaccine trial conducted in Thailand provided important preparatory information surrounding volunteer recruitment and motivations, and paves the way for future trials of HIV vaccines in Thailand.

AIDS Vaccines↗
PubMed2006

Anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex activity in an FMRI study of trial-to-trial adjustments on the Simon task.

People alter their task performance on a trial-to-trial basis, for example after an incongruent trial on tasks involving response conflict. Previous research has found that these adjustments are most robust in the Simon task. One explanation for behavioral adjustments is the conflict-monitoring hypothesis, which posits that the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) responds to conflict and that this serves as a signal to recruit other brain regions such as the prefrontal cortex (PFC) to minimize conflict and improve performance. However, another independently supported explanation for behavioral adjustments on the Simon task is the feature integration view, which can account for behavioral adjustments as the result of stimulus repetitions and alternations. Hence, by itself, evidence for behavioral adjustments on the Simon task does not clearly provide evidence for the conflict-monitoring hypothesis. However, the conflict-monitoring hypothesis does predict that behavioral adjustments on the Simon task should involve ACC conflict activity and PFC post-conflict activity. In the current study, consistent with the conflict-monitoring hypothesis, behavioral adjustments in performance on the Simon task were predicted by ACC conflict-related activity. In addition, subsequent behavioral adjustments were associated with PFC activity, with previous trial ACC conflict-related activity predicting greater PFC activity on subsequent trials. These results provide additional evidence that behavioral adjustments on the Simon task are due in part to ACC conflict monitoring and the subsequent recruitment of PFC to minimize conflict.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Gender effects on reaction time variability and trial-to-trial performance: reply to Deary and Der (2005).

Deary and Der (2005) reported significant gender effects on intraindividual variability in choice reaction time (CRT), and suggested several potential causes. In their procedure it was not possible to examine RTs on a trial-to-trial basis. We therefore investigate an additional possible cause: that men and women differ in their rate of performance improvement across trials, creating an apparent difference in variability. Using data from a large online CRT study, we replicate the finding that women are more variable in RT than men. However, we also demonstrate an interaction between gender and trial number for RT: women were initially slower than men, but became faster than men across a block. When the first two trials of the block are excluded, the gender effects on RT variability disappear.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Modeling the dependence between the number of trials and the success probability in binary trials.

A model for binary trials based on a bivariate generalization of the Poisson process for both the number of successes and number of trials with the transition rates dependent on the accumulating numbers of successes and trials is used to reanalyze some recently published data of Zhu, Eickhoff, and Kaiser (2003, Biometrics59, 955-961). This modeling admits alternative distributions for the numbers of trials and the numbers of successes conditional on the number of trials which generalize the Poisson and binomial distributions, without some of the restrictions apparent in the beta-binomial-Poisson mixed modeling of Zhu et al. (2003). Some quite marked differences between the results of this analysis and those described in Zhu et al. (2003) are apparent.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Fluvastatin in the therapy of acute coronary syndrome: Rationale and design of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (The FACS Trial)[ISRCTN81331696].

BACKGROUND: Activation of inflammatory pathways plays an important contributory role in coronary plaque instability and subsequent rupture, which can lead to the development of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Elevated levels of serum inflammatory markers such as C-reactive protein (CRP) represent independent risk factors for further cardiovascular events. Recent evidence indicates that in addition to lowering cholesterol levels, statins also decrease levels of inflammatory markers. Previous controlled clinical trials reporting the positive effects of statins in participants with ACS were designed for very early secondary prevention. To our knowledge, no controlled trials have evaluated the potential benefits of statin therapy, beginning immediately at the time of hospital admission. A previous pilot study performed by our group focused on early initiation of cerivastatin therapy. We demonstrated a highly significant reduction in levels of inflammatory markers (CRP and interleukin-6). Based on these preliminary findings, we are conducting a clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of another statin, fluvastatin, as an early intervention in patients with ACS. METHODS: The FACS-trial (Fluvastatin in the therapy of Acute Coronary Syndrome) is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating the effects of fluvastatin therapy initiated at the time of hospital admission. The study will enroll 1,000 participants admitted to hospital for ACS (both with and without ST elevation). The primary endpoint for the study is the influence of fluvastatin therapy on levels of inflammatory markers (CRP and interleukin-6) and on pregnancy associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A). A combined secondary endpoint is 30-day and one-year occurrence of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, recurrent symptomatic ischemia, urgent revascularization, and cardiac arrest. CONCLUSION: The primary objective of the FACS trial is to demonstrate that statin therapy, when started immediately after hospital admission for ACS, results in reduction of inflammation and improvement of prognosis. This study may contribute to new knowledge regarding therapeutic strategies for patients suffering from ACS and may offer additional clinical indications for the use of statins.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2006

Protocol for the Arterial Revascularisation Trial (ART). A randomised trial to compare survival following bilateral versus single internal mammary grafting in coronary revascularisation [ISRCTN46552265].

BACKGROUND: Standard coronary artery bypass graft surgery uses a single internal mammary artery and supplemental vein or radial artery grafts. Several observational studies have suggested a survival benefit with two internal mammary artery grafts compared to a single internal mammary artery graft, but this has not been tested in a randomised trial. The Arterial Revascularisation Trial is a Medical Research Council and British Heart Foundation funded, multi-centre international trial comparing single internal mammary artery grafting versus bilateral internal mammary artery grafting. METHODS/DESIGN: Twenty centres in the UK, Australia, Poland and Brazil are planning to randomise 3000 coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients to single or bilateral internal mammary artery grafting. Supplemental grafts may be either saphenous vein or radial artery. Coronary artery bypass grafting can be performed as an on-pump or off-pump procedure. The primary outcome is survival at 10 years and secondary end-points include clinical events, quality of life and cost effectiveness. The effect of age, left ventricular function, diabetes, number of grafts, vein grafts and off-pump surgery are pre-specified subgroups. DISCUSSION: The Arterial Revascularisation Trial is one of the first randomised trials to evaluate the effects on survival and other clinical outcomes of single internal mammary artery grafting versus bilateral internal mammary artery grafting, and will help to establish the best approach for patients requiring coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1995

Comparison of glutamate antagonists in continuous multiple-trial and single-trial dark avoidance.

NMDA receptor antagonists (MK-801, memantine, amantadine, CGP37849), and the AMPA receptor antagonist NBQX, were tested in a continuous multiple-trial two-choice dark avoidance paradigm. During training MK-801 (0.2mg/kg) and CGP-37849 (12mg/kg) increased the number of trials to criterion. Amantadine (92mg/kg) increased all parameters except the number of trials to criterion. CGP37849 (6 and 12mg/kg) increased the number of shocks per trial. Injection of MK-801 (0.2mg/kg), memantine (20mg/kg), amantadine (92mg/kg) or CGP37849 (6 or 12mg/kg) before training decreased the latency to enter the dark compartment in the retention test 24h later. NBQX affected neither training nor retention parameters. NMDA antagonists were also tested in a single-trial two-choice dark avoidance procedure. Pre-training but not pre-retention test injection of MK-801 (0.2mg/kg), memantine (20mg/kg), amantadine (92mg/kg) or CGP37849 (12mg/kg) decreased the latency to enter the dark compartment during retention; scopolamine had similar effects. Hence, NMDA receptor antagonists, but not the AMPA receptor antagonist NBQX, impair memory storage which is also seen in animals trained to criterion, indicating that interference with the acquisition processes is not solely responsible for the memory deficit. This deficit occurs at doses that do not appear to interfere with the recall and the performance of the previously learned response.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2003

Importance of trials versus accumulating time across trials in partially reinforced appetitive conditioning.

Four experiments with rats examined partial reinforcement in appetitive conditioning. In Experiment 1, adding nonreinforced trials to a continuous reinforcement schedule slowed acquisition, whereas deleting reinforcers did not. Trial massing suppressed performance and learning. In Experiment 2, conditioning with a short conditioned stimulus (CS) was rapid, and partial reinforcement with a short CS was as effective as continuous reinforcement with equal accumulated time in the CS. In Experiment 3, conditioning was nevertheless influenced by the probability of reinforcement. In Experiments 3 and 4, conditioning was especially disrupted when nonreinforced trials preceded reinforced trials closely in time. The results underscore the importance of temporal variables in conditioning but are more consistent with trial-based accounts than time-accumulation accounts of conditioning.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

Physical therapy on trial: the rationale, organization, and impact of a mock trial on physical therapy students' attitudes toward and confidence in research.

A learning activity, debate with a mock trial format, provides opportunities for physical therapy students to develop skill and confidence in learning to evaluate research critically, to formulate opinions regarding the credibility of the available evidence for a therapeutic approach to patient care, and to substantiate their choice of treatments with persuasive arguments and analytic rebuttals. The purposes of this study were to (1) describe the mock trial learning activity within a professional physical therapy curriculum and (2) determine whether the mock trial positively influenced students' attitudes toward research and confidence in their ability to interpret and apply research findings to clinical practice. A structured questionnaire was distributed to the 48 students at key points during the academic program to measure the overall effects of the physical therapy curriculum and the specific effects of the mock trial learning activity. There was an increase (p < 0.05) in the students' confidence in their ability to interpret and apply research after participating in the mock trial. The overall responses to the modified Attitudes-to-Research scale indicated that the physical therapy students generally held positive and optimistic attitudes toward research. These attitudes were maintained over the entire experience within the curriculum. If attitudes predict behavior, these future practitioners are more likely to be physical therapists who critically appraise and use evidence to determine practice.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Effect of prophylactic amiodarone on mortality after acute myocardial infarction and in congestive heart failure: meta-analysis of individual data from 6500 patients in randomised trials. Amiodarone Trials Meta-Analysis Investigators.

BACKGROUND: There have been 13 randomised controlled trials of prophylactic amiodarone in patients with recent myocardial infarction (MI) or congestive heart failure (CHF). None of these was powered to detect a mortality reduction of about 20%. We undertook a meta-analysis, based on data from individual patients, to provide a more sensitive and accurate assessment of the benefits and risks of prophylactic amiodarone. METHODS: Individual data from the studies were abstracted according to a predefined protocol. The summary odds ratios were calculated according to standard methods. FINDINGS: There were eight post-MI and five CHF trials; nine trials were double-blind and placebo-controlled, and four compared amiodarone with usual care. 6553 patients were randomly assigned treatment, of which 78% were in post-MI trials and 22% in CHF trials. 89% had had previous MI. The mean left-ventricular ejection fraction was 31%, and median frequency of ventricular premature depolarisation 18 per h. Total mortality was reduced by 13% (odds ratio 0.87 [95% CI 0.78-0.99], p = 0.030) based on classic fixed-effects meta-analysis and by 15% (0.85 [0.71-1.02], p = 0.081) with the more conservative random-effects approach. Arrhythmic/sudden death was reduced by 29% (0.71 [0.59-0.85], p = 0.0003). There was no effect on non-arrhythmic deaths (1.02 [0.87-1.19], p = 0.84). There was no difference in treatment effect between post-MI and CHF studies. The risk of arrhythmic/sudden death in control-group patients was higher in CHF than in post-MI studies (10.7 vs 4.1%), and the best single predictor of risk of arrhythmic/sudden death among all patients was symptomatic CHF. The excess (amiodarone minus control) risk of pulmonary toxicity was 1% per year. INTERPRETATION: Prophylactic amiodarone reduces the rate of arrhythmic/sudden death in high-risk patients with recent MI or CHF and this effect results in an overall reduction of 13% in total mortality.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Sirolimus- vs paclitaxel-eluting stents in de novo coronary artery lesions: the REALITY trial: a randomized controlled trial.

CONTEXT: Compared with bare metal stents, sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents have been shown to markedly improve angiographic and clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary revascularization, but their performance in the treatment of de novo coronary lesions has not been compared in a prospective multicenter study. OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and efficacy of sirolimus-eluting vs paclitaxel-eluting coronary stents. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized comparative trial (the REALITY trial) conducted between August 2003 and February 2004, with angiographic follow-up at 8 months and clinical follow-up at 12 months. SETTING: Ninety hospitals in Europe, Latin America, and Asia. PATIENTS: A total of 1386 patients (mean age, 62.6 years; 73.1% men; 28.0% with diabetes) with angina pectoris and 1 or 2 de novo lesions (2.25-3.00 mm in diameter) in native coronary arteries. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive a sirolimus-eluting stent (n = 701) or a paclitaxel-eluting stent (n = 685). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point was in-lesion binary restenosis (presence of a more than 50% luminal-diameter stenosis) at 8 months. Secondary end points included 1-year rates of target lesion and vessel revascularization and a composite end point of cardiac death, Q-wave or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass graft surgery, or repeat target lesion revascularization. RESULTS: In-lesion binary restenosis at 8 months occurred in 86 patients (9.6%) with a sirolimus-eluting stent vs 95 (11.1%) with a paclitaxel-eluting stent (relative risk [RR], 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61-1.17; P = .31). For sirolimus- vs paclitaxel-eluting stents, respectively, the mean (SD) in-stent late loss was 0.09 (0.43) mm vs 0.31 (0.44) mm (difference, -0.22 mm; 95% CI, -0.26 to -0.18 mm; P<.001), mean (SD) in-stent diameter stenosis was 23.1% (16.6%) vs 26.7% (15.8%) (difference, -3.60%; 95% CI, -5.12% to -2.08%; P<.001), and the number of major adverse cardiac events at 1 year was 73 (10.7%) vs 76 (11.4%) (RR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.69-1.27; P = .73). CONCLUSION: In this trial comparing sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting coronary stents, there were no differences in the rates of binary restenosis or major adverse cardiac events. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00235092.

Aged↗
PubMed1996

A randomized trial comparing the effect of prophylactic intravenous fresh frozen plasma, gelatin or glucose on early mortality and morbidity in preterm babies. The Northern Neonatal Nursing Initiative [NNNI] Trial Group.

UNLABELLED: Seven hundred and seventy-six children born before 32 weeks gestation between 1990 and 1992 were randomly allocated within 2 h of birth to one of three groups: either prophylactic fresh frozen plasma (20 ml/kg followed by 10 ml/kg after 24 h); or a similar volume of an inert gelatin plasma substitute (Gelofusine); or control management with a maintenance infusion of 10% dextrose. The three groups were similar at trial entry. There were no statistically significant differences in the number of deaths before discharge (fresh frozen plasma 19.1%, gelatin 22.0% and control 17.8%). Death or disability amongst long-term survivors at 2 years of age is the primary trial outcome variable: this information is not yet available. Death before discharge from hospital or the presence of a cerebral ultrasound scan abnormality 1 or 6 weeks after birth in survivors was a pre-defined secondary outcome variable (although 176 long-term survivors never had a scan, largely because they never needed care in a unit staffed to provide prolonged respiratory support or a routine scan service). Of the children entered into the three arms of the trial, 43.0%, 37.5% and 42.3% respectively died or were known to have developed at least a minor cerebral ultrasound abnormality before discharge. The proportions dead or known to have developed a major scan abnormality (ventriculomegaly or a persisting parenchymal abnormality), were 22.7%, 27.0% and 23.3%. CONCLUSION: Neither early prophylactic volume expansion, nor a coagulation factor supplement, had any detectable effect on short-term outcome in this large multicentre open trial.

Brain Ischemia↗
PubMed1995

Influence of the selection of angiographic projections on the results of coronary angiographic follow-up trials. International Nifedipine Trial on Antiatherosclerotic Therapy Investigators.

In recent years follow-up trials on coronary artery disease with angiographic end points analyzed quantitatively have gained increasing relevance and popularity. There is no consensus, however, on the method of calculation of progression or regression from multiple angiographic projections. Therefore the influence of the selection of angiographic projections on the outcomes of such trials was investigated with the data of the International Nifedipine Trial on Antiatherosclerotic Therapy. In 348 patients with coronary artery disease, repeated coronary angiograms were compared in multiple identical angiographic projections. Changes in angiographic parameters were averaged over the 1063 stenoses analyzed. Five methods of evaluation of multiple projections in the individual stenoses were applied, resulting in different extents of overall progression, or even regression of coronary artery disease (p < 0.01). It is concluded that in quantitative coronary angiographic follow-up trials changes should be averaged over all angiographic projections available for a stenosis to avoid overestimation of progression or regression.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed2026

Harnessing metabolomics and proteomics in a clinical trial for pulmonary arterial hypertension: insights from post-hoc analysis of the REHAB-PH trial.

BACKGROUND: The significant clinical and molecular heterogeneity of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) poses challenges in identifying effective therapies. Advanced multidimensional profiling offers an opportunity to capture molecular responses and assess biomarker stability, yet its application in randomised trials remains limited. METHODS: We evaluated the multi-omic profiles of participants with PAH in a randomised, placebo-controlled trial of famotidine. Plasma metabolomic and proteomic profiling was performed at enrolment and 24 weeks. Baseline profiles were compared between treatment arms to assess randomisation balance. Intraclass correlation coefficients quantified within-subject stability over time. Linear regression models adjusting for age, sex, body mass index and PAH aetiology evaluated famotidine's molecular effects. False discovery rate was controlled for multiple comparisons. FINDINGS: For the 79 participants, baseline multi-omic profiles were similar between groups. At 24 weeks, 34 and 37 participants remained in the famotidine and placebo groups respectively. The placebo group showed high molecular stability, while greater variability was observed in the famotidine group. Famotidine treatment was associated with significant changes across 191 proteomic pathways (q-value <0.05), but no metabolomic changes remained significant after multiple-testing correction. INTERPRETATION: Integrating multi-omics into a prospective clinical trial is feasible and yields stable longitudinal profiles in the absence of intervention. While famotidine did not yield clinical benefit, associated proteomic changes illustrate how molecular profiling can reveal treatment-related biology and inform future trial design. These findings highlight the broader utility of multi-omics for evaluating drug responses and identifying molecular endotypes in PAH and beyond. FUNDING: US National Institutes of Health.

Humans↗
PubMed1997

Angioplasty or surgery for multivessel coronary artery disease: comparison of eligible registry and randomized patients in the EAST trial and influence of treatment selection on outcomes. Emory Angioplasty versus Surgery Trial Investigators.

The Emory Angioplasty versus Surgery Trial (EAST) showed that multivessel patients eligible for both percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and coronary bypass surgery (CABG) had equivalent 3-year outcomes regarding survival, myocardial infarction, and major myocardial ischemia. Patients eligible for the trial who were not randomized because of physician or patient refusal were followed in a registry. This study compares the outcomes of the randomized and registry patients. Of the 842 eligible patients, 450 did not enter the trial. Their baseline features closely resembled those of the randomized patients and follow up was performed using the same methods. In the registry there was a bias toward selecting CABG in patients with 3-vessel disease (84%) and PTCA in patients with 2-vessel disease (54%). Three-year survival for the registry patients was 96.4%, which was better than the randomized patients, 93.4% (p = 0.044). Angina relief in the registry was equal for CABG and PTCA patients and was better for the PTCA registry (12.4%) than PTCA randomized patients (19.6%) (p = 0.079). Thus, the registry confirms that EAST is representative of all eligible patients and does not represent a low-risk subgroup. Since baseline differences were small, improved survival in the registry may be due to treatment selection. Physician judgment, even in patients judged appropriate for clinical trials, remains a potentially important predictor of outcomes.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

Comparison of two standard chemotherapy regimens for good-prognosis germ-cell tumours: a randomised trial. Australian and New Zealand Germ Cell Trial Group.

BACKGROUND: Most patients with metastatic germ-cell tumours are cured with chemotherapy. However, the optimum chemotherapy regimen is uncertain, and there is variation in international practice. We did a multicentre randomised trial to compare two standard chemotherapy regimens for men with good-prognosis germ-cell tumours. METHODS: Good prognosis was defined by modified Memorial Sloan-Kettering criteria. The first regimen (regimen A) was based on treatment recommendations from Indiana University and comprised three cycles of 20 mg/m2 cisplatin on days 1-5, 100 mg/m2 etoposide on days 1-5, and 30 kU bleomycin on days 1, 8, and 15, repeated every 21 days. The second regimen (regimen B) was based on the control regimen of a published randomised clinical trial and comprised four cycles of 100 mg/m2 cisplatin on day 1, 120 mg/m2 etoposide on days 1-3, and 30 kU bleomycin on day 1, repeated every 21 days. The primary outcome measure was overall survival. Analysis was by intention to treat. FINDINGS: 166 patients were randomised, 83 to each regimen. The trial was stopped when the second planned interim analysis met predefined stopping rules. The median follow-up was 33 months. Overall survival was substantially better with regimen A (three vs 13 deaths, hazard ratio 0.22 [95% CI 0.06-0.77], p=0.008). This difference was due to deaths from cancer (one vs nine), and not deaths from treatment (two vs two) and remained significant after adjustment for other prognostic factors (0.25 [0.07-0.88], p=0.03). INTERPRETATION: In men with good-prognosis germ-cell tumours, the regimen developed at Indiana University is superior to the alternative regimen studied in this trial. The lower total dose and dose-intensity of bleomycin and the lower dose-intensity of etoposide in regimen B could be responsible for the worse outcome.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1993

Anatomy of a trial: a historical view of the Monroe inactivated hepatitis A protective efficacy trial.

The performance of vaccine protective efficacy trials is often more complex than reports of final results suggest. The current article reviews the background, planning and preparations for the Monroe, NY, protective efficacy trial of a formalin-inactivated, alum-adjuvanted hepatitis A vaccine (VAQTA, manufactured by Merck Research Laboratories). The vaccine trial was carried out at Kiryas Joel, a Hasidic Jewish community which had experienced numerous annual outbreaks in a local environment with similarities to day-care centers. Careful communication, and cooperation of community leadership, a flexible technical resource team, and knowledge of an epidemic already ongoing in a sister community whose members were due to arrive for summer holidays, permitted rapid and efficient completion of the trial with a striking demonstration of protection after a single vaccine dose.

Clinical Protocols↗
PubMed1997

Design of a cost-effectiveness study within a randomized trial: the LIPID Trial for Secondary Prevention of IHD. Long-term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischemic Heart disease.

The Long-term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischemic Heart Disease (LIPID) trial is a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial evaluating the long-term effect of pravastatin on coronary mortality in patients with a previous myocardial infarction or unstable angina-ischemic heart disease (IHD). It is planned to run for at least five years with 9014 patients from 85 centers in Australia and New Zealand. The trial will monitor cause-specific mortality and major clinical events associated with each treatment. Running in parallel with the main study is a prospective economic analysis, the objectives of which are (1) to estimate the effectiveness of pravastatin compared with placebo in terms of survival, quality of life (QOL), and quality-adjusted life-years (QALY); (2) to estimate the resource usage associated with pravastatin compared with placebo-in particular, to study whether it alters resource usage through prevention of disease progression; and (3) to use this information for a cost-utility analysis with cost per quality-adjusted life-year as the unit of analysis. A novel aspect of the design is the use of a preliminary cost-effectiveness analysis, based on "best-guess" values, and a sensitivity analysis over plausible ranges to guide the choice of subsample size. Some data, such a mortality, days spent in hospital, major clinical events, and drug use, are being collected within the main LIPID trial. However, additional subsamples for the cost-effectiveness study will include information on quality of life, time off work, and resources used, such as time in hospital, procedures, and medications taken. The methods and sample sizes for these substudies have been a crucial issue in validity and feasibility.

Absenteeism↗