Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Questionnaires”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 433 records · Page 24Linked to original sources

Agreement between parental and self-completed questionnaires about asthma in teenagers.

In studies of asthma in children, a common method is for the parents to complete questionnaires about their child's asthma symptoms. With longitudinal studies of asthma, children reach an age when they can complete the questionnaire themselves. The aim of this paper was to compare the prevalence of asthma symptoms as well as the agreement between responses to an asthma questionnaire completed by teenagers and their parents. As a part of the Obstructive Lung Disease in Northern Sweden Study (OLIN) pediatric study, where 3345, 13-14-yr-old children completed an asthma questionnaire, 294 (84%) randomly selected parents also completed the questionnaire, which included the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) questionnaire. There were no significant differences in the prevalence of wheeze in the last 12 months, ever asthma, or physician diagnosed asthma as reported by the parents compared with the teenagers. However, the teenagers reported a significantly higher prevalence of wheeze during or after exercise. The absolute agreement was generally very high while the level of agreement (kappa-value) was slightly lower. The highest results in both absolute agreement and kappa-value, were reached by the questions on diagnosis of asthma (98.9% and 0.93), use of asthma medicines (95.5% and 0.78), and whether the child ever had had asthma (97.2% and 0.86), respectively. In conclusion, the agreement between the parents' and the teenagers' responses to the asthma questionnaire was good. The change in methodology from parental to self-completion of the questionnaire did not affect the results in the study.

Adolescent↗

Diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease using a new questionnaire.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: An early and accurate evaluation by a general practitioner is needed to screen out non-gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients. A recent questionnaire (QUEST) highlighted problems with specificity and complexity, so the aim of the present study was to design a simplified questionnaire. METHODS: When admitted to hospital to undergo an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for suspected GERD, 333 patients completed a 50-item questionnaire requiring 'yes/no' answers to different combinations of questions relating to symptoms of upper gastrointestinal tract conditions (e.g. GERD, ulcers and functional dyspepsia) and psychosomatic symptoms. The endoscopic diagnosis was then correlated with the rate of positive answers to each question. RESULTS: Based on the analysis of the 50 items, the 8-10 questions most often answered affirmatively by each of the GERD and non-GERD groups were chosen for the simplified questionnaire. Three draft questionnaires were compiled. After calculating the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy in relation to the diagnosis of GERD and other conditions, it was found that questionnaire B (selection of persons answering 'yes' to at least one of questions 1-5 and exclusion of persons answering 'yes' to at least three of questions 7-10) had a high sensitivity, high specificity and low false positive rate. CONCLUSION: A novel questionnaire was developed. It was designed to detect the symptoms of GERD while simultaneously excluding non-GERD patients. This simplified nine-item simplified questionnaire had a sensitivity of 79.8%, a specificity of 53.6% and an accuracy of 63.4%.

Chi-Square Distribution↗

Development and validation of the Menorrhagia Outcomes Questionnaire.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and evaluate the acceptability, reliability and validity of a short, patient-based questionnaire for assessing the outcomes of surgical treatment for menorrhagia due to benign disease. DESIGN: A psychometric study by postal survey. SETTING: Five hospitals in southeast England. SAMPLE: One hundred and eleven women undergoing hysterectomy for menorrhagia due to benign disease. METHODS: Data from a long research questionnaire used in the North West Thames Hysterectomy Study were analysed using standard psychometric methods to identify the subset of items which were the most scientifically sound indicators of outcome. The Menorrhagia Outcomes questionnaire is a 26-item questionnaire which covers symptoms, post-operative complications, quality of life, and women's satisfaction with outcome. The questionnaire was field tested for acceptability, reliability and validity by postal survey. RESULTS: The Menorrhagia Outcomes Questionnaire was found to be highly acceptable to women and showed excellent internal consistency, test-retest reliability, criterion and construct validity. CONCLUSION: The Menorrhagia Outcomes Questionnaire is a practical and scientifically sound measure of outcome from the woman's perspective following surgical treatment for menorrhagia due to benign disease. It takes less than five minutes to complete, is appropriate for use with different surgical treatments for menorrhagia (eg. hysterectomy, endometrial resection, laser ablation) and is feasible for routine monitoring of large numbers of women by postal survey. Most importantly, this questionnaire has been shown to perform well from a scientific point view, having met standard psychometric criteria for reliability and validity.

Adolescent↗

Development and psychometric evaluation of the ICIQ Vaginal Symptoms Questionnaire: the ICIQ-VS.

OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate a self-completion questionnaire for comprehensive assessment of the severity and impact of vaginal symptoms and related sexual matters, particularly those attributed to pelvic organ prolapse. To provide an instrument that can characterise the severity of these symptoms, measure their impact and evaluate treatment outcome. DESIGN: Prospective development of the content of the questionnaire and testing of its psychometric properties including validity. SETTING: Two hospital-based urogynaecology clinics and one community general practice in the South of England. POPULATION: One hundred and forty-one urogynaecology clinic attendees with varying degrees of pelvic organ prolapse and 77 randomly selected women registered with a general practice. METHODS: The questionnaire was developed through a literature review, consultation with clinicians and health scientists and structured interviews with patients. Content validity, construct validity, stability, internal consistency and sensitivity to change were examined by comparing the responses from the urogynaecology clinic with responses from the general community. Sensitivity to change was assessed using responses from women undergoing surgical treatment for pelvic organ prolapse before and 3 months after surgery. A final version of the questionnaire was obtained after factor analysis to assist item reduction and refinement of the scoring system. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Content validity, construct validity, stability (test-retest reliability), internal consistency and sensitivity to change. RESULTS: The questionnaire exhibited good validity, reliability and sensitivity to change. Excellent internal consistency was demonstrated for vaginal (Cronbach's alpha 0.79) and sexual (Cronbach's alpha 0.84) symptoms. Reliability was good. The questionnaire was able to identify changes in symptoms following surgical treatment. The final ICIQ-VS questionnaire had 14 items and a simple scoring system. CONCLUSION; The ICIQ-VS self-completion questionnaire meets the need for a robust instrument for assessing a range of vaginal and sexual symptoms, in particular those of pelvic organ prolapse. It will be of use in both routine clinical practice and epidemiological research, particularly when there is a need to assess the severity of these symptoms or the efficacy of treatment.

Adult↗

Validation of a new quality of life questionnaire for acute migraine headache.

A brief migraine-specific quality of life questionnaire was developed to assess the quality of life decrement associated with an acute migraine attack in the 24-hour period following headache onset. The migraine quality of life questionnaire has 15 questions across five domains (work functioning, social functioning, energy, concerns, and symptoms). A prospective, observational study was conducted to evaluate the characteristics of internal consistency, construct and discriminant validity, and responsiveness of the migraine quality of life questionnaire. One hundred thirty-eight subjects with migraine were recruited. One hundred seven subjects completed a baseline and a 24-hour postmigraine quality of life questionnaire, along with a migraine diary for recording headache severity, activity limitation, associated symptoms, duration of headache, and use of migraine medication. All five migraine quality of life questionnaire domains showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha, 0.74-0.95). The strongest correlations were seen between activity limitation and associated symptoms and the migraine quality of life questionnaire work, social, and energy domains. Significant differences in mean questionnaire scores between subjects were found with frequency of medication use, global change in symptoms, headache duration, and severity. All five domains showed significant responses within subjects from a migraine-free period to an acute migraine period (P < 0.0001). In summary, the migraine quality of life questionnaire showed good internal consistency, construct and discriminant validity, and responsiveness to acute migraine attacks.

Acute Disease↗

Validation of a voice prosthesis questionnaire to assess valved speech and its related issues in patients following total laryngectomy.

OBJECTIVES: To establish the reliability and validity of a new self-administered questionnaire to assess valved speech and its related issues in patients who have undergone a total laryngectomy operation. DESIGN: Cross-sectional psychometric validation study. SETTING: Tertiary cancer care centre. PATIENTS: We identified sixty-one total laryngectomy patients with no sign of recurrent disease and using voice prosthesis from the speech and language therapy database of the Royal Marsden Hospital. The patients were assessed using a postal self-administered voice prosthesis questionnaire concerning the voice valve and it's related issues. Patients were also asked to complete the University of Michigan voice related quality of life and University of Washington head and neck quality of life (version 4) questionnaires. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Test-retest and internal consistency reliability; content; criterion and construct validity. RESULTS: We received completed questionnaires from fifty-one of the sixty-one total laryngectomy patients identified for the study providing a response rate of 84%. The median age of the group was 65 years (range: 40-85) with thirty-seven males and fourteen females. The internal consistency reliability using the Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.87 (range: 0.85 to 0.89). Test-retest reliability showed that more than 75% of patients had a score on re-test that was within 1 point of their original score. Content validity was ensured during the design process. The median Spearman correlation coefficient was 0.25 for convergent construct validity with the University of Washington head and neck quality of life questionnaire and 0.64 for criterion validity on comparison with the University of Michigan voice related quality of life scale. CONCLUSIONS: The voice prosthesis questionnaire is the first validated and reliable self-administered questionnaire designed specifically for evaluating valved speech and its related issues in patients who have undergone total laryngectomy. The voice prosthesis questionnaire has significant utility for audit, outcomes research and monitoring in this unique group of patients.

Adult↗

A comparison of four shoulder-specific questionnaires in primary care.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the validity, responsiveness to change, and user friendliness of four self completed, shoulder-specific questionnaires in primary care. METHODS: A cross sectional assessment of validity and a longitudinal assessment of responsiveness to change of four shoulder questionnaires was carried out: the Dutch Shoulder Disability Questionnaire (SDQ-NL); the United Kingdom Shoulder Disability Questionnaire (SDQ-UK); and two American instruments, the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) and the Shoulder Rating Questionnaire (SRQ). 180 primary care consulters with new shoulder region pain each completed two of the questionnaires, as well as EuroQoL and 10 cm visual analogue scales (VAS) for overall pain and difficulty due to the shoulder problem. Each participant was assessed by a standardised clinical schedule. Postal follow up at 6 weeks included baseline measures and self rated assessment of global change of the shoulder problem (seven point Likert scale). RESULTS: Strongest correlations were found for SDQ-UK with EuroQoL 5 score, and for SPADI and SRQ with shoulder pain and difficulty VAS. All shoulder questionnaires correlated poorly with active movement at the painful shoulder. SPADI and SRQ performed better on ROC analysis than SDQ-NL and SDQ-UK (areas under the curve of 0.87, 0.85, 0.77, and 0.77, respectively). However, SRQ scores changed significantly over time in stable subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Cross sectional comparison of the four shoulder questionnaires showed they had similar overall validity and patient acceptability. SPADI and SRQ were most responsive to change. Additionally, SPADI was the quickest to complete and scores did not change significantly in stable subjects.

Adult↗

Validation of a self administered questionnaire to elicit gastrointestinal symptoms.

Self administered questionnaires are becoming popular investigative tools in medical research, yet few reports state the extent of methods used to validate these questionnaires before their general use. A pilot study was therefore carried out to validate a 41 item questionnaire for use in a population screening study for gastrointestinal disease. Participants in the study comprised 69 population controls, 40 patients with benign disease, and 35 patients with gastrointestinal cancer. Acceptability, ease of completion, reliability, and reproducibility of the questionnaire were all assessed. Only one subject refused to complete the questionnaire. Ninety six per cent of the questions were completed by each subject and only one response in 1440 was altered in the reproducibility study. The questionnaire disclosed symptoms similar to those elicited by a clinician and highlighted unreported gastrointestinal symptoms in the control group. Three questions were found to be unreliable and were altered before the questionnaire was put into general use. It is concluded that a pilot study to validate a new questionnaire is simple to perform and necessary to identify unreliable questions.

Gastrointestinal Neoplasms↗

Validation of a specific quality of life questionnaire for functional digestive disorders.

BACKGROUND: Dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome are suitable conditions for assessment of quality of life. Their similarities justify the elaboration of a single specific questionnaire for the two conditions. AIMS: To examine the process leading to the validation of the psychometric properties of the functional digestive disorders quality of life questionnaire (FDDQL). METHODS: Initially, the questionnaire was given to 154 patients, to assess its acceptability and reproducibility, analyse its content, and reduce the number of items. Its responsiveness was tested during two therapeutic trials which included 428 patients. The questionnaire has been translated into French, English, and German. The psychometric validation study was conducted in France, United Kingdom, and Germany by 187 practitioners. A total of 401 patients with dyspepsia or irritable bowel syndrome, defined by the Rome criteria, filled in the FDDQL and generic SF-36 questionnaires. RESULTS: The structure of the FDDQL scales was checked by factorial analysis. Its reliability was expressed by a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.94. Assessment of its discriminant validity showed that the more severe the functional digestive disorders, the more impaired the quality of life (p<0.05). Concurrent validity was supported by the correlation found between the FDDQL and SF-36 questionnaire scales. The final version of the questionnaire contains 43 items belonging to eight domains. CONCLUSIONS: The properties of the FDDQL questionnaire, available in French, English, and German, make it appropriate for use in clinical trials designed to evaluate its responsiveness to treatment among patients with dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome.

Adult↗

Impact of a postcard versus a questionnaire as a first reminder in a postal lifestyle survey.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to consider the impact of two different types of reminder on response rates and costs in a postal survey. DESIGN: The study was a cross sectional survey. A self-completion lifestyle questionnaire was used. Those who did not respond after the initial mailing were randomly allocated to receive either a postcard or questionnaire as a first reminder. All outstanding non-responders received a questionnaire as a second reminder. SUBJECTS: A representative sample of 698 adults aged 16-70 was used, drawn from a family health services authority register. MAIN RESULTS: Postcard reminders were as effective as questionnaire reminders in increasing response whether one or two reminders are sent. The costs per response were calculated. Two questionnaires as reminders were found to be 1.7 times more expensive than a postcard plus questionnaire. Including the initial mailing, the cost per response using all questionnaires was 1.3 times the cost when a postcard was used for the first reminder. CONCLUSIONS: To increase the response to a postal survey effectively and economically, two reminders should be sent--first a postcard and then a questionnaire.

Attitude to Health↗

Day surgery; development of a questionnaire for eliciting patients' experiences.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a single, short, acceptable, and validated postal questionnaire for assessing patients' experiences of the process and outcome of day surgery. DESIGN: Interviews and review of existing questionnaires; piloting and field testing of draft questionnaires; consistency and validity checks. SETTING: Four hospitals, in Coventry (two), Swindon, and Milton Keynes. PATIENTS: 373 patients undergoing day surgery in 1990. MAIN MEASURES: Postoperative symptoms, complications, health and functional status, general satisfaction, and satisfaction with specific aspects of care. RESULTS: Response rates of 50% were obtained on field testing draft questionnaires preoperatively and one week and one month after surgery. 28% of initial non-responders replied on receiving a postal reminder, regardless of whether or not a duplicate questionnaire was sent; a second reminder had little impact. Many patients who expressed overall satisfaction with their care were nevertheless dissatisfied with some specific aspects. Outcome and satisfaction were related to three aspects of case mix; patient's age, sex, and type of operative procedure. The final questionnaire produced as a result of this work included 28 questions with precoded answers plus opportunities to provide qualitative comments. Several factors (only one, shorter questionnaire to complete, fewer categories of nonresponders, and administration locally) suggested that a response rate of at least 65% (with one postal reminder) could be expected. CONCLUSION: A validated questionnaire for day surgery was developed, which will be used to establish a national comparative database.

Ambulatory Surgical Procedures↗

Use of a safety climate questionnaire in UK health care: factor structure, reliability and usability.

AIM: To explore the factor structure, reliability, and potential usefulness of a patient safety climate questionnaire in UK health care. SETTING: Four acute hospital trusts and nine primary care trusts in England. METHODS: The questionnaire used was the 27 item Teamwork and Safety Climate Survey. Thirty three healthcare staff commented on the wording and relevance. The questionnaire was then sent to 3650 staff within the 13 NHS trusts, seeking to achieve at least 600 responses as the basis for the factor analysis. 1307 questionnaires were returned (36% response). Factor analyses and reliability analyses were carried out on 897 responses from staff involved in direct patient care, to explore how consistently the questions measured the underlying constructs of safety climate and teamwork. RESULTS: Some questionnaire items related to multiple factors or did not relate strongly to any factor. Five items were discarded. Two teamwork factors were derived from the remaining 11 teamwork items and three safety climate factors were derived from the remaining 11 safety items. Internal consistency reliabilities were satisfactory to good (Cronbach's alpha > or =0.69 for all five factors). CONCLUSIONS: This is one of the few studies to undertake a detailed evaluation of a patient safety climate questionnaire in UK health care and possibly the first to do so in primary as well as secondary care. The results indicate that a 22 item version of this safety climate questionnaire is useable as a research instrument in both settings, but also demonstrates a more general need for thorough validation of safety climate questionnaires before widespread usage.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

A new standardised and self-administered quality of life questionnaire specific to obstructive sleep apnoea.

BACKGROUND: A short, standardised, self-administered quality of life questionnaire would be a useful addition to the outcome measures in obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) research. A study was therefore undertaken to validate a new OSA specific self-administered questionnaire (the Quebec Sleep Questionnaire, QSQ) for use in clinical trials. METHODS: This study followed a description of health related quality of life in patients with OSA. Construct validity and responsiveness were tested by comparing the baseline and changes in domain scores (daytime sleepiness, diurnal symptoms, nocturnal symptoms, emotions, social interactions) with those of questionnaires measuring related constructs (SF-36, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, Beck Depression Inventory, SCL-90, and Functional Outcomes in Sleep Questionnaire). RESULTS: Sixty patients (48 men) of mean (SD) age 55 (10) years participated in the study. In the analysis of the discriminative function of the questionnaire, moderate to high correlations were found between the scores in each domain of the QSQ and the corresponding questionnaires. In the analysis of its evaluative function significant differences were found in score changes between patients who were treated and those who were not, and moderate to high correlations were seen between changes in scores in the QSQ and changes in the corresponding questionnaires. Most of these correlations met the a priori predictions made regarding their magnitude. CONCLUSION: The QSQ is a valid measure of health related quality of life in patients with OSA and is sensitive to treatment induced changes.

Female↗

Validity and reliability of the Huet questionnaire to assess maximal oxygen uptake.

The usual fitness tests available to assess maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max), a key fitness component, are not particularly useful for epidemiological studies. Questionnaires to assess VO2max, however, are simple, easy to use, and inexpensive. In 1986, Huet developed such a French general questionnaire, which now also has an English version. Its simplicity is interesting as it could be used to survey large populations. The purpose of this study was to assess the validity and reliability of this Huet questionnaire in a sample of healthy French volunteers. A total of 108 subjects were included in this study, 88 males and 20 females. The validity of the questionnaire was checked using correlation coefficients and a Bland-Altman plot between questionnaire estimations and measures of VO2max obtained with a stress test on a cycle ergometer. An intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was also calculated to determine the reliability of the questionnaire. Significant correlation was obtained with the Huet questionnaire and measured VO2max (r2 = 0.77, p = 0.0001, SEE = 5.97 ml x kg (-1 ) x min- (1), n = 108). The ICC showed very high reliability (ICC= 0.988, n = 21). The Huet questionnaire is an easy, rapidly administered tool that correlated highly with VO2 max in this sample population.

Adolescent↗

[Validation of the Spanish version of the SEAR (Self-Esteem And Relationship Questionnaire) for men with erectile dysfunction].

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The aim was to validate the Spanish version of the Self-Esteem and Relationship Questionnaire (SEAR), specific for patients with erectile dysfunction (ED), and based on the concept of self-esteem, for use in research and clinical practice in Spain. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Observational, prospective, multisite, study comparing patients with ED (IIEF questionnaire score < 26 points), with a score (3/4) 16 points in the Self-Esteem domain of the SEAR questionnaire and undergoing treatment with sildenafil (group A), and healthy control subjects without ED. Patients with ED were assessed at baseline and after 3 months' treatment. RESULTS: Among 586 evaluable subjects (504 patients with ED and 82 health subjects) the questionnaire showed: a) adequate feasibility with a percentage of patients without response < 5%; b) adequate reliability with Cronbach alpha coefficients for the total and all domains (Sexual-Relationship, Confidence, Self-Esteem, and Overall-Relationship), of SEAR questionnaire, respectively: 0.92, 0.89, 0.84, 0.75, and 0.82 un patients, and 0.86, 0.80, 0.73, 0.56 and 0.74 un healthy subjects; c) adequate discriminatory validity between patients and healthy subjects (Mann-Whitney test, p < 0.0001), and between patients with vaying degrees of ED (Kruskall-Wallis test, p < 0.05); d) adequate convergent/divergent validity (correlations > 0.5 with the IIEF questionnaire and r > 0.3 and < 0.5 with Mental Health domain score of SF-12 questionnaire); e) adequate construct validity, obtaining 2 domains: Sexual-Relationship, and Confidence, and f) adequate sensitivity to clinical changes (SES: 2.1/SRM: 1.5/SEM: 4.4/MID: 13.1). Mark scores were estimated. CONCLUSIONS: The Spanish version of the SEAR questionnaire showed adequate and similar psychometric properties to those shown with the original English version.

Erectile Dysfunction↗

Comparison of discriminative properties among disease-specific questionnaires for measuring health-related quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Three disease-specific, health-related quality of life (HRQL) questionnaires have been introduced to assess patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), the Breathing Problems Questionnaire (BPQ), and the Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire (CRQ). The purpose of the present study was to make comparisons between the SGRQ, the BPQ, and the CRQ in their discriminative properties, and to clarify the characteristics of each questionnaire. One hundred forty-three patients with mild to severe COPD completed pulmonary function tests, progressive cycle ergometer testing for exercise capacity, assessment of dyspnea, anxiety, and depression, and assessment of HRQL. The frequency distributions of the questionnaire scores showed that the SGRQ and the CRQ were normally distributed and that the BPQ was skewed toward low scores. Relationships between all dimensions of the three questionnaires were significant (correlation coefficients [Rs] = 0.74 to 0.86). The three questionnaires had significant but weak correlations (Rs = -0.24 to -0.36) with some physiologic variables (VC, FEV1, and DL(CO)/VA) and mild to moderate correlations with exercise capacity and assessment of dyspnea, anxiety, and depression. Stepwise multiple regression analyses revealed that the Baseline Dyspnea Index (BDI) score, anxiety by the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HAD), and maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) accounted for 61% of the variance in the SGRQ and that the BDI and anxiety of the HAD accounted for 53 and 49% of the variance in the BPQ and the CRQ, respectively. Dyspnea and psychologic status impacted the HRQL in patients with COPD. Although no substantial differences between the SGRQ, the BPQ, and the CRQ were evident in the correlations with physiologic parameters and the influential factors, the BPQ was found to be less discriminatory than the SGRQ and the CRQ in evaluating HRQL cross-sectionally.

Aged↗

Development of a questionnaire to assess vision problems under low luminance in age-related maculopathy.

PURPOSE: To develop a questionnaire for assessing self-reported visual problems under low luminance and at night for use in studies on age-related maculopathy (ARM). METHODS: The questionnaire was developed in three steps: (1) Content for questionnaire items was identified through focus groups of older adults with ARM and those exhibiting normal retinal aging. The topic for discussion was "vision at night and under low lighting." Discussion was audiotaped, transcribed, and subjected to content analysis to identify problem categories expressed by patients. (2) This content was used to develop a preliminary questionnaire administered by telephone to persons with ARM or normal retinal aging. Principal-components analysis identified groups of items that formed the questionnaire's subscales that were evaluated for internal consistency, and an item-reduction strategy was implemented to generate a briefer questionnaire. (3) Psychometric properties of the shortened Low-Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) were determined, including construct validity, criterion validity, and test-retest reliability. RESULTS: The 32-item LLQ has six subscales (driving, extreme lighting, mobility, emotional distress, general dim lighting, and peripheral vision), all with good internal consistency (Cronbach alpha > or = 0.82). Scores on LLQ subscales correlated moderately with nearly all National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ)-25 subscales and decreased in value (indicating more disability) for patients with increasing ARM disease severity. Whereas rod-mediated parameters of dark adaptation were significantly associated with LLQ subscale scores (r = 0.19-0.43, all P < 0.03), cone-mediated parameters were not. Test-retest reliability ranged from 0.74 to 0.88 for all subscales (P < 0.0001), except for peripheral vision (0.46; P = 0.0003), which also exhibited a ceiling effect in almost half of the respondents. CONCLUSIONS: The 32-item LLQ, derived from the content of focus group comments by persons with ARM, has good construct validity, subscale scores related to rod-mediated visual function, and good test-retest reliability for five of six subscales. The LLQ may ultimately be useful in patient-centered evaluation of the outcome of interventions to prevent ARM or to arrest progression of early disease.

Aged↗

Controlled trial of a patient-completed history questionnaire: effects on quality of documentation and patient and physician satisfaction.

The purpose of this work was to study the impact of a patient-self-completed history questionnaire upon the quality of the information in the medical record, resource utilization, patient satisfaction, and physician satisfaction. A controlled trial was performed in a primary care clinic of a public supported, urban, university hospital. The patients were mainly poor, minority, urban individuals visiting the clinic for their first primary care visit. The providers were attending physicians, nurse practitioners, and medical residents associated with the Department of Medicine teaching program. A self-administered history questionnaire was given to approximately half the new patients in a randomized, prospective manner. The physicians completed an assessment form on all new patients estimating the time spent, complexity of the case, and listing studies requested. If a history questionnaire was completed by the patient, the physician completed an assessment irrespective of whether it helped or hindered the evaluation of the patient. After the visit, nurses called the patient by telephone and asked questions concerning the patient's satisfaction. The patients' records were reviewed for the initial history papers. There were 127 patients receiving the history questionnaire and 114 controls. The presence of the history questionnaire in the medical record added to both the quantity and the quality of the information present. Of the provider responses, 87% (95% confidence interval: 78-93%) wanted all new patients to complete the questionnaire. Of the patients who received the questionnaire, all who were asked felt that all their issues were addressed, compared with only 83% in the control group (P = .015). No increases in physician time or in utilization of medical resources were found. The implementation of a self-administered history questionnaire in an urban primary care clinic resulted in improved chart quality and improved satisfaction of physicians and patients.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗