Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Propofol”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 433 records · Page 24Linked to original sources
PubMed1992

Effects of propofol and thiopental in isolated rat aorta and pulmonary artery.

This study was performed to determine if direct arterial dilating actions of propofol contribute to the drug's hypotensive actions. The effects of propofol were compared with those of thiopental on isolated vascular ring preparations from rat thoracic aorta and pulmonary artery. Thoracic aortic ring responses were evaluated in the presence and absence of endothelium, indomethacin, and N omega-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (LNAME; a specific inhibitor of endothelium-derived relaxing factor-nitric oxide [EDRF/NO] synthase). Pulmonary artery responses were investigated with intact endothelium. After the induction of active isometric force by a predetermined EC50 dose of phenylephrine for each ring, effects of propofol (30, 100, 300 microM) and thiopental (10, 30, 100 microM) were examined. Propofol caused significant vasodilation in endothelium-intact, endothelium-denuded, and LNAME-treated aortic rings. In the endothelium-intact aortic and pulmonary artery rings, the initial vasodilation due to 30 and 100 microM propofol showed gradual and partial recovery over 15 min; 300 microM propofol caused sustained vasodilation. Endothelium-denuded rings and LNAME-pretreated endothelium-intact rings showed constant and sustained vasodilation with all propofol concentrations. Propofol also caused marked vasodilation in pulmonary arteries. In contrast, thiopental had no vasodilating effect in aortic or pulmonary artery preparations. In control experiments, propofol vehicle (Intralipid) also had no effect on vascular rings. Indomethacin pretreatment induced a dose-dependent vasoconstriction by thiopental in endothelium-intact rings and decreased the vasodilation due to propofol.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Animals↗
PubMed1993

Pulmonary uptake of propofol in cats. Effect of fentanyl and halothane.

BACKGROUND: Many drugs are removed by the lung. The pulmonary uptake of one drug can be inhibited when a second, highly accumulated drug is administered parenterally or as a chronic oral treatment. The effect of inhalational anesthetics on pulmonary drug uptake has not been extensively studied and may alter pharmacokinetics of intravenously administered drugs. METHODS: The uptake of propofol by the lung during a single passage through the pulmonary circulation was studied in four groups of anesthetized cats: spontaneously breathing cats (control group, n = 6), cats whose lungs were mechanically ventilated (n = 6), and cats whose lungs were mechanically ventilated and that were anesthetized with 1% (n = 6) or 1.5% (n = 6) halothane. In an additional group, the single-pass pulmonary uptake of propofol was studied in six spontaneously breathing cats pretreated with fentanyl. The amount of propofol taken up by the lung during the first pass was measured from double indicator-dilution outflow curves using indocyanine green (ICG) as the intravascular reference indicator. RESULTS: The first-pass uptake of propofol (mean +/- SEM) was 61.3 +/- 4.9% and 60 +/- 3.7% of the injected dose in control cats and in cats whose lungs were mechanically ventilated, respectively. Although exposure of the animals to 1% halothane had no significant effect on pulmonary extraction of propofol, the first-pass uptake decreased significantly to 38.8 +/- 6.9% in cats exposed to 1.5% halothane compared with control cats and to cats undergoing mechanical ventilation of the lungs without exposure to halothane. Also, in animals pretreated with fentanyl, propofol uptake was reduced to 40 +/- 5% compared with the control group. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate a substantial extraction of propofol by the lung that is not affected by mechanical ventilation. Inhibition of propofol uptake by 1.5% halothane and by fentanyl provides a potential mechanism of drug-drug interaction that may interfere with the pharmacokinetic profile of propofol, and may alter the amount of propofol needed to achieve or supplement a given depth of anesthesia.

Anesthesia, Inhalation↗
PubMed1994

Propofol causes a dose-dependent decrease in the thermoregulatory threshold for vasoconstriction but has little effect on sweating.

BACKGROUND: Volatile anesthetics increase the core temperature required to trigger sweating and decrease the core temperature required to trigger vasoconstriction. However, little is known about the effects of intravenous anesthetics on thermoregulation. We therefore tested the hypothesis that propofol increases the sweating threshold and decreases the vasoconstriction threshold, thereby increasing the inter-threshold range (core temperatures not triggering autonomic thermoregulatory responses). The study was conducted using a new model in which thermal manipulations were restricted to insensate skin, and sensate skin temperature was controlled. METHODS: Six healthy, male volunteers were studied on 3 randomly ordered days: no propofol, target propofol blood concentration 2 micrograms/ml, and target blood propofol concentration 4 micrograms/ml. Each day, epidural anesthesia (approximately T11 level) was induced, using 2% 2-chloroprocaine (one volunteer received bupivacaine). Thermal manipulations were confined to the legs, and we attempted to maintain upper-body (sensate) skin temperature constant. Propofol was infused by a computer-controlled infusion pump. Volunteers were heated until sweating was observed, then cooled until fingertip vasoconstriction was observed. The sweating threshold was defined as the tympanic membrane temperature triggering sustained evaporative heat loss > 40 g.m-2.h-1. Similarly, the vasoconstriction threshold was defined as the tympanic membrane temperature triggering a sustained reduction in fingertip blood flow to < 0.25 ml/min. Central venous blood was assayed for propofol blood concentration. RESULTS: Increasing propofol concentration produced a linear decrease the vasoconstriction threshold (slope = -0.53 +/- 0.34 degrees C.microgram-1.ml-1; R2 = 0.98 +/- 0.04 [mean +/- SD]), but had little effect on the sweating threshold. The inter-threshold range was 0.51 +/- 0.46 degrees C during epidural anesthesia alone, and increased significantly, by 0.49 +/- 0.31 degrees C.microgram-1.ml-1 during propofol administration. CONCLUSIONS: Like volatile anesthetics, propofol reduces the vasoconstriction threshold and increases the inter-threshold range. However, propofol differs in leaving the sweating threshold unchanged.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Negative and selective effects of propofol on isolated swine myocyte contractile function in pacing-induced congestive heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Although propofol (2-6 di-isopropylphenol) is commonly used to induce and maintain anesthesia and sedation for surgery, systematic hypotension and reduced cardiac output can occur in patients with or without intrinsic cardiac disease. The effect of propofol on myocyte contractility after the development of congestive heart failure (CHF) remains unknown. This study tested the hypothesis that propofol would have direct effects on myocyte contractile function in both healthy and CHF cardiac myocyte preparations. METHODS: Isolated left ventricular (LV) myocyte contractile function (shortening velocity, micron/s) was examined in myocytes from five control pigs and in five pigs with pacing-induced CHF (240 beats/min, for 3 weeks) in the presence of propofol concentrations ranging from 1-6 micrograms/ml. In addition, myocyte contractility in response to beta-adrenergic receptor stimulation (isoproterenol, 10-50 nM) in the presence of propofol (3 micrograms/ml) was examined. RESULTS: Three weeks of pacing caused LV dysfunction consistent with CHF as evidenced by increased LV end-diastolic diameter (control 3.3 +/- 0.1 cm vs. CHF 5.6 +/- 0.2 cm; P < 0.05) and reduced LV fractional shortening (control 34 +/- 3% vs. CHF 12 +/- 2%, P < 0.05). Propofol (6 micrograms/ml) caused a concentration-dependent negative effect on velocity of shortening from baseline in both control (67 +/- 2 microns/s vs. 27 +/- 3 microns/s; P < 0.05) and CHF myocytes (29 +/- 1 microns/s vs. 15 +/- 1 microns/s; P < 0.05). Importantly, CHF myocytes were more sensitive than control myocytes to the negative effects of propofol on velocity of shortening at the lower concentration (1 microgram/ml). beta-adrenergic responsiveness was reduced by propofol (3 micrograms/ml) in control myocytes only. CONCLUSIONS: Propofol has a direct and negative effect on basal myocyte contractile processes in the setting of CHF, which is more pronounced than that on healthy myocytes at reduced propofol concentrations.

Adrenergic beta-Agonists↗
PubMed1998

The influence of method of administration and covariates on the pharmacokinetics of propofol in adult volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Unresolved issues with propofol include whether the pharmacokinetics are linear with dose, are influenced by method of administration (bolus vs. infusion), or are influenced by age. Recently, a new formulation of propofol emulsion, containing disodium edetate (EDTA), was introduced in the United States. Addition of EDTA was found by the manufacturer to significantly reduce bacterial growth. This study investigated the influences of method of administration, infusion rate, patient covariates, and EDTA on the pharmacokinetics of propofol. METHODS: Twenty-four healthy volunteers aged 26-81 yr were given a bolus dose of propofol, followed 1 h later by a 60-min infusion. Each volunteer was randomly assigned to an infusion rate of 25, 50, 100, or 200 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1). Each volunteer was studied twice under otherwise identical circumstances: once receiving propofol without EDTA and once receiving propofol with EDTA. The influence of the method of administration and of the volunteer covariates was explored by fitting a three-compartment mamillary model to the data. The influence of EDTA was investigated by direct comparison of the measured concentrations in both sessions. RESULTS: The concentrations of propofol with and without EDTA were not significantly different. The concentration measurements after the bolus dose were significantly underpredicted by the parameters obtained just from the infusion data. The kinetics of propofol were linear within the infusion range of 25-200 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1). Age was a significant covariate for Volume2 and Clearance2, as were weight, height, and lean body mass for the metabolic clearance. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that method of administration (bolus vs. infusion), but not EDTA, influences the pharmacokinetics of propofol. Within the clinically relevant range, the kinetics of propofol during infusions are linear regarding infusion rate.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Propofol-induced increase in vascular capacitance is due to inhibition of sympathetic vasoconstrictive activity.

BACKGROUND: Venodilation is thought to be one of the mechanisms underlying propofol-induced hypotension. The purpose of this study is to test two hypotheses: (1) propofol increases systemic vascular capacitance, and (2) the capacitance change produced by propofol is a result of an inhibition of sympathetic vasoconstrictor activity. METHODS: In 33 Wistar rats previously anesthetized with urethane and ketamine, vascular capacitance was examined before and after propofol infusion by measuring mean circulatory filling pressure (Pmcf). The Pmcf was measured during a brief period of circulatory arrest produced by inflating an indwelling balloon in the right atrium. Rats were assigned into four groups: an intact group, a sympathetic nervous system (SNS)-block group produced by hexamethonium infusion, a SNS-block + noradrenaline (NA) group, and a hypovolemic group. The Pmcf was measured at a control state and 2 min after a bolus administration of 2, 10, and 20 mg/kg of propofol. RESULTS: The mean arterial pressure (MAP) was decreased by propofol dose-dependently in intact, hypovolemic, and SNS-block groups, but the decrease in MAP was less in the SNS-block group (-25%) than in the intact (-50%) and hypovolemic (-61%) groups. In the SNS-block + NA group, MAP decreased only at 20 mg/kg of propofol (-18%). The Pmcf decreased in intact and hypovolemic groups in a dose-dependent fashion but was unchanged in the SNS-block and SNS-block + NA groups. CONCLUSIONS: The results have provided two principal findings: (1) propofol decreases Pmcf dose-dependently, and (2) the decrease in Pmcf by propofol is elicited only when the sympathetic nervous system is intact, suggesting that propofol increases systemic vascular capacitance as a result of an inhibition of sympathetic nervous system.

Anesthetics, Intravenous↗
PubMed1999

Effect of propofol on arachidonate cascade by vasopressin in aortic smooth muscle cells: inhibition of PGI2 synthesis.

BACKGROUND: The mechanisms underlying the vascular effects of propofol are not fully understood. Vasopressin, a potent vasoactive peptide, stimulates the arachidonate cascade and the synthesis of prostacyclin (PGI2; the main metabolite of the cascade in vascular smooth muscle cells). Arachidonic acid (AA) release by phospholipases is the rate-limiting step in the cascade. We investigated the mechanisms underlying vasopressin-induced AA release and the effect of propofol on PGI2 synthesis in a rat aortic smooth muscle cell line: A10 cells. METHODS: In cultured A10 cells pretreated with propofol, the stimulation by vasopressin of AA release and PGI2 synthesis was evaluated by measuring [3H]AA and 6-keto PGF1alpha, respectively, in the culture medium. The effects of propofol on vasopressin-induced activation of phosphoinositide-hydrolyzing phospholipase C and phosphatidylcholine-hydrolyzing phospholipase D were evaluated by measuring inositol phosphate formation and choline formation, respectively. RESULTS: A phospholipase C inhibitor and a phosphatidic acid phosphohydrolase inhibitor both attenuated vasopressin-induced AA release and PGI2 synthesis, as did a phospholipase A2 inhibitor. Propofol inhibited vasopressin-induced activation of phosphoinositide-hydrolyzing phospholipase C and phosphatidylcholine-hydrolyzing phospholipase D, but this effect of propofol was significant only at supraclinical concentration (0.1 mM). Propofol reduced vasopressin-induced PGI2 synthesis. The inhibitory effect was observed at concentrations (10 microM-0.1 mM) higher than those used clinically. CONCLUSIONS: Propofol suppresses the arachidonate cascade caused by vasopressin at least partly by inhibiting phosphoinositide-hydrolyzing phospholipase C and phosphatidylcholine-hydrolyzing phospholipase D, resulting in the inhibition of PGI2 synthesis. Propofol-mediated inhibition of vasopressin-stimulated synthesis of PGI2 may reduce the vasorelaxation by propofol.

Anesthetics, Intravenous↗
PubMed1999

Mechanisms underlying the inhibitory effect of propofol on the contraction of canine airway smooth muscle.

BACKGROUND: Propofol has been shown to produce relaxation of preconstricted airway smooth muscle. Although the inhibition of calcium mobilization is supposed to be the major mechanism of action, the whole picture of the mechanisms is not completely clear. METHODS: Contractile response was performed using canine tracheal rings. The effects of propofol on carbachol-induced mobilization of intracellular Ca2+ and phosphoinositide hydrolysis were measured using cultured canine tracheal smooth muscle cells by monitoring fura-2 signal and assessing the accumulation of [3H]-inositol phosphates. To detect the effect of propofol on muscarinic receptor density and affinity, [3H]N-methyl-scopolamine was used as a radioligand for receptor binding assay. RESULTS: Pretreatment with propofol shifts the concentration-response curves of carbachol-induced smooth muscle contraction to the right in a concentration-dependent manner without changing the maximal response. Propofol not only decreased the release of Ca2+ from internal stores but also inhibited the calcium influx induced by carbachol. In addition, carbachol-induced inositol phosphate accumulation was attenuated by propofol; the inhibitory pattern was similar to the contractile response. Moreover, propofol did not alter the density of muscarinic receptors. The dissociation constant value was not altered by pretreatment with 100 microM propofol but was significantly increased by 300 microM (propofol, 952+/-229 pM; control, 588+/-98 pM; P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Propofol attenuates the muscarinic receptor-mediated airway muscle contraction. The mechanism underlying these effects was attenuation of inositol phosphate generation and inhibition of Ca2+ mobilization through the inhibition of the receptor-coupled signal-transduction pathway.

Anesthetics, Intravenous↗
PubMed1999

Ketamine preserves and propofol potentiates hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction compared with the conscious state in chronically instrumented dogs.

BACKGROUND: The authors tested the hypothesis that ketamine and propofol anesthesia would alter the magnitude of hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction compared with the conscious state. In addition, they assessed the extent to which cyclooxygenase pathway inhibition and adenosine triphosphate-sensitive potassium channel inhibition modulate hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction in the conscious state, and whether these pathways are altered during propofol anesthesia. METHODS: Twenty conditioned, male mongrel dogs were chronically instrumented to measure the left pulmonary vascular pressure-flow relationship. Pressure-flow plots were measured during normoxia and hypoxia (systemic arterial PO2 reduced to about 60 and about 50 mm Hg) on separate days in the conscious state, during ketamine anesthesia, and during propofol anesthesia. The effects of indomethacin and glibenclamide on the magnitude of hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction were also assessed in the conscious and propofol-anesthetized states. RESULTS: Neither ketamine nor propofol had an effect on the baseline pressure-flow relationship during normoxia compared with the conscious state. Hypoxia resulted in stimulus-dependent pulmonary vasoconstriction (P<0.01) in the conscious state. Compared with the conscious state, the magnitude of hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction was preserved during ketamine but was potentiated (P<0.01) during propofol anesthesia. Indomethacin enhanced (P<0.01) hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction in both the conscious and propofol-anesthetized states. In contrast, glibenclamide only enhanced (P<0.01) hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction in the conscious state and had no effect during propofol anesthesia. CONCLUSION: Hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction is preserved during ketamine anesthesia but is potentiated during propofol anesthesia. The potentiated response during propofol anesthesia appears to be caused by inhibition of adenosine triphosphate-sensitive potassium channel-mediated pulmonary vasodilation.

Anesthetics, Dissociative↗
PubMed1999

Cardioprotective effects of propofol and sevoflurane in ischemic and reperfused rat hearts: role of K(ATP) channels and interaction with the sodium-hydrogen exchange inhibitor HOE 642 (cariporide).

BACKGROUND: Sodium ion-hydrogen ion (Na(+)-H(+)) exchange inhibitors are effective cardioprotective agents. The N(+)-H(+) exchange inhibitor HOE 642 (cariporide) has undergone clinical trials in acute coronary syndromes, including bypass surgery. Propofol and sevoflurane are also cardioprotective via unknown mechanisms. The authors investigated the interaction between propofol and HOE 642 in the ischemic reperfused rat heart and studied the role of adenosine triphosphate-sensitive potassium (K(ATP)) channels in the myocardial protection associated with propofol and sevoflurane. METHODS: Isolated rat hearts were perfused by the Langendorff method at a constant flow rate, and left ventricular function and coronary pressures were assessed using standard methods. Energy metabolites were also determined. To assess the role of K(ATP) channels, hearts were pretreated with the K(ATP) blocker glyburide (10 microM). Hearts were then exposed to either control buffer or buffer containing HOE 642 (5 microM), propofol (35 microM), sevoflurane (2.15 vol%), the K(ATP) opener pinacidil (1 microM), or the combination of propofol and HOE 642. Each heart was then subjected to 1 h of global ischemia followed by 1 h of reperfusion. RESULTS: Hearts treated with propofol, sevoflurane, pinacidil, or HOE 642 showed significantly higher recovery of left ventricular developed pressure and reduced end-diastolic pressures compared with controls. The combination of propofol and HOE 642 provided superior protection toward the end of the reperfusion period. Propofol, sevoflurane, and HOE 642 also attenuated the onset and magnitude of ischemic contracture and preserved high-energy phosphates (HEPs) compared with controls. Glyburide attenuated the cardioprotective effects of sevoflurane and abolished the protection observed with pinacidil. In contrast, glyburide had no effect on the cardioprotection associated with propofol treatment. CONCLUSION: HOE 642, propofol, and sevoflurane provide cardioprotection via different mechanisms. These distinct mechanisms may allow for the additive and superior protection observed with the combination of these anesthetics and HOE 642.

Adenosine Triphosphate↗
PubMed1999

First-pass lung uptake and pulmonary clearance of propofol: assessment with a recirculatory indocyanine green pharmacokinetic model.

BACKGROUND: The principal site for elimination of propofol is the liver. The clearance of propofol exceeds hepatic blood flow; therefore, extrahepatic clearance is thought to contribute to its elimination. This study examined the pulmonary kinetics of propofol using part of an indocyanine green (ICG) recirculatory model. METHODS: Ten sheep, immobilized in a hammock, received injections of propofol (4 mg/kg) and ICG (25 mg) via two semipermanent catheters in the right internal jugular vein. Arterial blood samples were obtained from the carotid artery. The ICG injection was given for measurement of intravascular recirculatory parameters and determination of differences in propofol and ICG concentration-time profiles. No other medication was given during the experiment, and the sheep were not intubated. The arterial concentration-time curves of ICG were analyzed with a recirculatory model. The pulmonary uptake and elimination of propofol was analyzed with the central part of that model extended with a pulmonary tissue compartment allowing elimination from that compartment. RESULTS: During the experiment, cardiac output was 3.90+/-0.72 l/min (mean +/- SD). The blood volume in heart and lungs, measured with ICG, was 0.66+/-0.07 l. A pulmonary tissue compartment of 0.47+/-0.16 l was found for propofol. The pulmonary first-pass elimination of propofol was 1.14+/-0.23 l/min. Thirty percent of the dose was eliminated during the first pass through the lungs. CONCLUSIONS: Recirculatory modeling of ICG allows modeling of the first-pass pulmonary kinetics of propofol concurrently. Propofol undergoes extensive uptake and first-pass elimination in the lungs.

Algorithms↗
PubMed2000

Investigation of effective anesthesia induction doses using a wide range of infusion rates with undiluted and diluted propofol.

BACKGROUND: The influence of infusion rate on the induction dose-response relation has not been investigated over a wide range of infusion rates. In this study, the authors defined the effect of different propofol infusion rates on the times and doses necessary to reach clinical induction of anesthesia. METHODS: The subjects of the study were 250 patients classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II aged 25-55 yr. For induction with undiluted propofol, 180 patients were allocated randomly to one of two groups of 90 patients each (A and B). Each group was further divided into nine subgroups (10 patients each) that were administered propofol infusion at rates of 10, 15, 20, 30, 40, 60, 100, 200, and 300 mg/kg-1/h-1. The remaining 70 patients (group C) were allocated randomly into seven subgroups (10 patients each), and these groups were induced with diluted propofol (0.5 mg/ ml) at the rates of 10, 15, 30, 60, 100, 200, and 300 mg/kg-1/ h-1. Group B was given crystalloid at the same infusion rates as group C via a catheter in the opposite arm. Induction time, induction dose, plasma arterial propofol concentration at loss of consciousness, and percentage decrease of systolic blood pressure were measured. A previously reported three-compartment model with an effect-site rate constant for propofol of 0.456/min was used to predict the induction time and dose at each infusion rate. RESULTS: The differences between predicted induction time and dose and the observed time and dose could be explained by factoring in the lag time from infusion site to central compartment (lag time circulation) and the amount of propofol in transit during this time (residual dose circulation). Residual dose circulation and lag time circulation correlated with infusion time from 20 to 60 s for undiluted and from 0 to 40 s for diluted propofol. At the infusion rates greater than 80 mg/kg-1/h-1, rapid circulation because of incomplete mixing in the central compartment decreased the excess induction time and dose. The use of diluted propofol significantly attenuated the decrease in systolic blood pressure provoked by the residual dose circulation. CONCLUSIONS: Induction dose and time are dependent on infusion rate in a complex manner, and residual dose circulation was a factor in overdose and hemodynamic depression. Hypotension during induction was attenuated by diluted propofol.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Pulmonary disposition of propofol in surgical patients.

BACKGROUND: The lungs have been mentioned as a possible site contributing to the extrahepatic clearance of propofol. The objective of the present study was to clarify the pulmonary disposition of propofol directly in human lungs by investigating both the first-pass uptake and pulmonary extraction at pseudo-steady state. METHODS: Nine patients were enrolled in the first-pass uptake study. Propofol (5 mg) and indocyanine green (ICG; 15 mg) were simultaneously administered via a central venous catheter within 1 s, and sequential arterial blood samples were obtained from the radial artery at 1-s intervals up to 45 s. Eleven patients were included in the infusion study, and propofol was infused via the jugular vein at a rate of 50 microgram. kg-1. min-1. Blood samples were simultaneously collected from pulmonary and radial arteries up to 60 min. RESULTS: A pronounced difference in the dilution curves between propofol and ICG was observed, and 28.4 +/- 11.6% (mean +/- SD) of propofol was taken up during the single passage through the human lung. The mean pulmonary transit time of propofol (31.3 +/- 6.0 s) was significantly longer than that of ICG (22.4 +/- 2.7 s; P < 0.01), indicating that some of the propofol trapped by lungs returned to the circulation by back diffusion. In the constant infusion study, no significant differences were observed with the plasma concentrations of propofol between pulmonary and radial arteries except for that at 2 min. The area under the curve of pulmonary and radial arterial concentration curves to 60 min were 59.1 +/- 14.8 and 56.8 +/- 12.5 microg. ml-1. min-1, respectively. No significant difference was observed with the area under the curve, suggesting that metabolism was not involved in the pulmonary uptake in human lungs. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the propofol that undergoes pulmonary uptake during the first pass was released back to the circulation by back diffusion. Metabolism was not involved in the pulmonary uptake in human lungs.

Anesthesia, General↗
PubMed2001

Effects of propofol on H-reflex in humans.

BACKGROUND: Depression of spinal cord motoneuron excitability has been proposed to contribute to surgical immobility. The H-reflex, which measures alpha-motoneuron excitability, is depressed by volatile anesthetics, whereas the action of propofol is unknown. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of propofol anesthesia on the H-reflex. METHODS: In 13 patients (group 1), H-reflex was measured before (T0), 3 min after (T1), and 10 min after (T2) a 2-mg/kg bolus dose of propofol, followed by an infusion of 10 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1). Ten patients (group 2) were studied when propofol was given via a programmable pump set to a propofol blood concentration of 6 microg/ml, and 10 patients (group 3) were studied with the pump set to 9 microg/ml. Latencies and amplitudes of H-reflexes (H0, H1, H2) and M-responses (M0, M1, M2) of the soleus muscle were recorded, and H/M ratios (H0/M0, H1/M1, H2/M2) were calculated. RESULTS: In group 1, H-reflex amplitudes and the H/M ratio were diminished after induction with propofol (H0 vs. H1, P = 0.033; H0/M0 vs. H1/M1, P = 0.042). After 10 min of propofol infusion, the H2/M2 ratio was still decreased versus H0/M0 (P = 0.031). In group 2, no difference was detected. In group 3, propofol depressed H-reflex amplitudes at T2 (H0 vs. H2, P < 0.01), and amplitudes were also lower at T2 than at T1 (H1 vs. H2, P < 0.01). In this group, the H/M ratio decreased from T0 to T2 (H0/M0 vs. H2/M2, P < 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: During steady state conditions using propofol as the sole agent, a depression of the H-reflex is observed only at a high blood concentration of 9 microg/ml. The authors suggest that immobility during propofol anesthesia is not caused by a depression of spinal motoneuron circuit excitability.

Anesthesia, Inhalation↗
PubMed2002

Effects of subhypnotic doses of propofol on gastric emptying in volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Drugs which accelerate gastric emptying (GE) decrease nausea and vomiting. This could contribute to the antiemetic potential of subhypnotic doses of propofol. On the contrary, subhypnotic doses of propofol used for sedation could decrease GE and thus favor regurgitation and pulmonary inhalation. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the effect of low-dose propofol infusion on GE. METHODS: On three separate occasions, 10 volunteers received either a propofol infusion at a rate set to achieve a target plasma concentration of 0.5 microg/ml or equivalent volumes of 10% Intralipid(R) or 0.9% saline. GE for solids was measured by using the octanoic acid breath test. An acetaminophen absorption technique measured the GE rate for liquids. Blood samples were assayed for acetaminophen and propofol. Breath samples were analyzed for (13)CO(2) concentration by isotope-ratio mass spectrometry. Carbon dioxide production (VCO(2)) was measured instead of calculated by indirect calorimetry. Sedation was evaluated by the Bispectral Index of the electroencephalogram. RESULTS: Propofol blood concentrations were 0.32 +/- 0.20 and 0.45 +/- 0.18 microg/ml at 60 and 165 min, respectively. These concentrations were not sedative. Propofol or its solvent did not modify GE for solids or liquids. In all groups, differences in GE were obtained if measured VCO(2) was integrated in the formula instead of calculated VCO(2) (P < 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Subhypnotic doses of propofol known to be antiemetic do not inhibit GE. These results suggest that the antiemetic properties of propofol are not peripheral and that propofol cannot be considered as a prokinetic agent. V(13)CO(2) must be measured instead of calculated to accurately determine GE.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Negative and positive inotropic effects of propofol via L-type calcium channels and the sodium-calcium exchanger in rat cardiac trabeculae.

BACKGROUND: Conflicting opinions are present in the literature regarding the origin of the negative inotropic effect of propofol on the myocardium. This study aims to resolve these discrepancies by investigating the inotropic effects of propofol the L-type calcium channels and the sodium-calcium exchanger (NCX). METHODS: The effect of 20 microg/ml propofol on force development was determined in rat cardiac trabeculae at different pacing frequencies and different extracellular calcium concentrations. Postrest potentiation, sodium withdrawal during quiescence, and the NCX inhibitor KB-R7943 were used to study changes in the activity of the reverse mode of the NCX by propofol. RESULTS: The effect of propofol on steady state peak force depended on pacing frequency and calcium concentration. A negative inotropic effect was observed at pacing frequencies greater than 0.5 Hz, but a positive inotropic effect was observed at 0.1 Hz and low calcium, which cannot be explained by an effect on the L-type calcium channel. Propofol enhanced postrest potentiation in a calcium-dependent manner. Sodium withdrawal during quiescence and the use of the specific NCX inhibitor KB-R7943 provided evidence for an enhancement of calcium influx by propofol the reverse mode of the NCX. CONCLUSIONS: The effects of propofol on the myocardium depend on pacing frequency and calcium concentration. The positive inotropic effect of propofol is associated with increased calcium influx the reverse mode of the NCX. The authors conclude that the net inotropic effect of propofol is the result of its counteracting influence on the functioning of the L-type calcium channel and the NCX.

Anesthetics, Intravenous↗
PubMed2002

Influence of hemorrhage on propofol pseudo-steady state concentration.

BACKGROUND: A small induction dose has been recommended in cases of hemorrhagic shock. However, the influence of hemorrhage on the amplitude of plasma propofol concentration has not yet been fully investigated during continuous propofol infusion. The authors hypothesized that the effect of hemorrhage on plasma propofol concentration is variously influenced by the different stages of shock. METHODS: After 120 min of steady state infusion of propofol at a rate of 2 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1), nine instrumented immature swine were studied using a stepwise increasing hemorrhagic model (200 ml of blood every 30 min until 1 h, then additional stepwise bleeding of 100 ml every 30 min thereafter, to the point of circulatory collapse). Hemodynamic parameters and plasma propofol concentration were recorded at every step. RESULTS: Before total circulatory collapse, it was possible to drain 976 +/- 166 ml (mean +/- SD) of blood. Hemorrhage of less than 600 ml (19 ml/kg) was not accompanied by a significant change in plasma propofol concentration. At individual peak systemic vascular resistance, when cardiac output and mean arterial pressure decreased by 31% and 14%, respectively, plasma propofol concentration increased by 19% of its prehemorrhagic value. At maximum heart rate, when cardiac output and mean arterial pressure decreased by 46% and 28%, respectively, plasma propofol concentration increased by 38%. In uncompensated shock, it increased to 3.75 times its prehemorrhagic value. CONCLUSIONS: During continuous propofol infusion, plasma propofol concentration increased by less than 20% during compensated shock. However, it increased 3.75 times its prehemorrhagic concentration during uncompensated shock.

Anesthetics, Intravenous↗
PubMed2002

Sulfite supported lipid peroxidation in propofol emulsions.

BACKGROUND: Sodium metabisulfite is added to a commercial propofol emulsion as an antimicrobial agent. The sulfite ion (SO3(-2)) is capable of undergoing a number of reactions, including autooxidation and the promotion of lipid peroxidation. This study evaluated sulfite reactivity in propofol emulsions by determining thiobarbituric acid reacting substances (TBARS), sulfite depletion, and emulsion pH in emulsions containing sulfite or EDTA. METHODS: Commercial EDTA and sulfite propofol emulsions were compared, and 10% soybean oil emulsion containing various additives were evaluated for TBARS, sulfite, and pH. TBARS were analyzed with a modified thiobarbituric acid method. Sulfite was analyzed by the reaction of sulfite with 5,5'-dithiobis(2-nitrobenzoic acid). pH was measured by glass electrode methodology. RESULTS: Thiobarbituric acid reacting substances were detectable in commercial sulfite propofol emulsions in concentrations ranging from 0.02 to 0.22 microg/ml based on malondialdehyde. No TBARS were detected in EDTA propofol emulsions. Incubation (37 degrees C, up to 6 h) of sulfite propofol emulsions in air resulted in further increases in TBARS (35-160%). No increases occurred in incubated EDTA propofol emulsions. Metabisulfite (0.25 mg/ml) alone added to 10% soybean oil resulted in large increases in TBARS that were inhibited in part by propofol (10 mg/ml) and completely by ascorbic acid (0.05 mg/ml). Soybean oil emulsion pH declined rapidly on the addition of metabisulfite (0.25 mg/ml). The addition of propofol (10 mg/ml) partially inhibited the decline in pH and ascorbic acid (0.05 mg/ml) completely inhibited it. CONCLUSION: These results show that sulfite supports the peroxidation of lipids in soybean oil emulsions and propofol functions to partially inhibit these processes.

Ascorbic Acid↗