The Fourth International Serum Exchange Workshop to standardize cytoplasmic islet cell antibodies. The Immunology and Diabetes Workshops and Participating Laboratories.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · Search PubMed
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
In the early stages of Type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus patients present a deficient insulin response to glucose. The reasons for this defective response are unknown, but it has been suggested that it reflects a deleterious effect of excessive glucose stimulation on a reduced Beta-cell mass. Female non-obese diabetic (NOD) mice from our colony, at the age of 12-13 weeks, have a normal basal glycaemia but an impaired intravenous glucose tolerance test, insulitis and a defective insulin response to glucose. In order to characterize the potential effect of glucose on the Beta cells at that "pre-diabetic" stage, pancreatic islets were isolated from 12-13 week old female NOD mice. Immediately after isolation (day 0) the NOD islets displayed a defective insulin response to an acute stimulation with 16.7 mmol/l glucose. After seven days in culture at both 11 and 28 mmol/l glucose these islets showed an increased insulin release in response to an acute glucose stimulation. This increase was more pronounced in the islets cultured at 28 mmol/l glucose. Experiments performed in parallel, using islets obtained from a non-diabetes prone strain of mice (Naval Medical Research Institute, NMRI) showed that these islets had a similar insulin release in response to glucose both on day 0 and after seven days in culture at 11 mmol/l glucose. The insulin mRNA levels of NOD islets did not change over one week in culture at 11 or 28 mmol/l glucose, but culture at the high glucose concentration induced a decrease in the islet insulin content.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Placental isoferritin is produced by activated T lymphocytes and may, therefore, be considered as a manifestation of T cell involvement. Placental isoferritin is measured using CM-H-9 monoclonal antibody which binds exclusively to placental isoferritin. Placental isoferritin has been determined in the serum of 80 patients with Type I (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus, 100 healthy first degree relatives and 81 healthy children. Serum levels which were measured in Type 1 diabetic patients, (24.0-140 U/ml; median and range) were significantly higher than those of family members (0,0-73; median and range; p less than 0.0001) and normal control subjects (0,0-48; median and range; p less than 0.0001). Using 0-10 U/ml as the upper limit of normal, it was found that 31 of 50 (62%) of Type 1 diabetic patients, 25 of 100 (25%) family members and 7 of 81 (8.6%) healthy control subjects had abnormal placental isoferritin levels. Islet cell antibodies were positive in 31 of 44 tested diabetic patients and, in 8 of 71 tested family members, and among them 54.8% and 50% respectively also had elevated placental isoferritin levels. However, no statistically significant correlation was found between islet cell antibodies and placental isoferritin levels. Treatment of Type 1 diabetic patients with insulin was accompanied by a significant decrease (p less than 0.002) of serum placental isoferritin within 2-4 weeks of treatment. It is noteworthy that placental isoferritin was below detection in 34 of 35 Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetic patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Non-diabetic identical twins of insulin-dependent diabetic patients were studied within five years of the diagnosis of their index twin in order to determine whether changes in intermediary metabolism precede the onset of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Two studies were performed: a cross-sectional study of 12 non-diabetic twins and a prospective study of a separate group of 41 non-diabetic twins. Of the 12 twins tested in the cross-sectional study six developed insulin-dependent diabetes and six did not; the six who developed diabetes were given an oral glucose load a mean of 10 months before diagnosis; they then had normal fasting blood glucose levels but worse glucose tolerance than control subjects (120 min post-load (mean +/- SD) blood glucose 8.5 +/- 3.5 vs 4.9 +/- 0.9 mmol/l respectively, p less than 0.05). However, blood lactate, pyruvate, alanine, glycerol, 3-hydroxybutyrate and serum insulin levels were similar. In contrast, the six twins in this cross-sectional study who did not develop diabetes and are now unlikely to do so, as a group, had no significant changes compared with the control subjects though one had impaired glucose tolerance. To determine the predictive value of impaired glucose tolerance a separate group of 41 non-diabetic twins was studied prospectively for 8 to 22 years having a total of 147 glucose tolerance tests in this period; in this group six developed diabetes. Eight of the 41 had impaired glucose tolerance; impaired glucose tolerance was found in four of the six who developed diabetes as compared with only four of the 35 who did not (p less than 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Insulin resistance and impaired insulin secretion are thought to be the primary defects in the pathogenesis of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). Disproportionately increased proinsulin relative to insulin levels are suggested to be an early indicator of a failing pancreas. We examined the relationship of fasting specific insulin, proinsulin, and 32, 33 split proinsulin concentrations, and the proinsulin: insulin ration to the risk of developing NIDDM 3.5 years later in 65-74-year-old non-diabetic Finnish subjects participating in a population-based study (n=892) on diabetes and heart disease. Altogether 69 subjects developed NIDDM over a 3.5-year follow-up (cases). The cases were compared to randomly-selected gender-matched control subjects (n=69) and control subjects matched for gender, glucose tolerance status (normal or impaired), and body mass index (n=69). There were no differences in insulin concentrations between cases and random or matched control subjects [median and interquartile range: 123 (77-154), 108 (74-143), 118 (83-145) pmol/l, p=0.271]. Random control subjects had lower proinsulin and 32, 33 split proinsulin concentrations and split proinsulin: insulin ratios compared to cases [5.7 (3.8-9.0) vs 7.3 (4.8-10.0) pmol/l, p=0.005; 7.3 (4.5-13.0 vs 10.4 (7.1-18.0) pmol/l, p=0.002; 0.073 (0.057-0.110) vs 0.097 (0.060- 0.135), p=0.003]. Matched control subjects had lower proinsulin concentrations and proinsulin: insulin ratios compared to cases [5.9 (4.0-7.7) vs 7.3 (4.8-10.0) pmol/l, p=0.019; 0.048 (0.035-0.071) vs 0.064 (0.045-0.100), p=0.008]. When cases were compared to matched control subjects a 1 SD increase in baseline proinsulin: insulin ratio was associated with a 1.37-fold risk (p=0.020) of developing diabetes. Moreover, this association was independent of fasting glucose concentration at baseline. Thus, in elderly prediabetic subjects disproportionately increased proinsulin concentration, an indicator of defective insulin secretion, is associated with conversion to diabetes over a short time period.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
An 11-year prospective study was carried out in 180 non-diabetic patients with organ-specific autoimmune diseases to evaluate islet cell antibodies in predicting Type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. Islet cell antibodies were characterised according to titres, persistence, complement-fixing ability, and pattern. During follow-up, 14 of 46 patients with islet cell antibodies persistently greater than 5 Juvenile Diabetes Foundation Units (JDF-U) (30.4%), none of 23 with islet cell antibodies between 2.5 and 5 JDF-U or fluctuating, and 3 of 109 without islet cell antibodies (2.7%), developed diabetes. The cumulative risk of developing diabetes was 70%, 0%, and 4%, respectively. All the patients who developed diabetes were females. Eight progressed to insulin-dependence acutely, four showed a transient period of non-insulin-dependence, while two were still insulin-free. No difference was found in titres of islet cell antibodies for the risk of diabetes. Complement-fixing islet cell antibodies enhanced the cumulative risk for the disease in patients with conventional islet cell antibodies at low-middle (> or = 2.5-40 JDF-U), but not at high (> or = 80 JDF-U) titres. Forty-two patients with islet cell antibodies were investigated for the whole or the selective pattern. In the presence of the whole pattern the cumulative risk for diabetes rose to 100%, while with the selective pattern it declined to 34%. The whole pattern was found in 83% of patients who developed Type 1 diabetes acutely. In patients with organ-specific autoimmune diseases, the whole islet cell antibody pattern greatly enhances the prediction for diabetes.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
IgG and IgM class insulin autoantibodies were measured by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in sera from members of the Barts-Windsor-Middlesex prospective family study for Type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes. One hundred and twelve individuals from 28 families were selected for study on the basis of a clearly defined islet cell antibody status. IgG insulin autoantibodies were found to be significantly associated with islet cell antibody positive (n = 30) versus islet cell antibody negative (n = 57) first degree family relatives (p = 0.002), with increased significance (p = 0.0003) if complement-fixing (CF)-islet cell antibody individuals (n = 20) only were considered. In addition, a significant association of IgG insulin autoantibodies with subsequent development of diabetes was observed within the CF-islet cell antibody positive group (p less than 0.0003). No such associations were found for IgM insulin autoantibodies, but a higher prevalence of these autoantibodies was observed in islet cell antibody negative first degree relatives (n = 57) compared with a control group of 73 Blood Bank donors (p = 0.00007), and they were significantly associated with siblings (n = 48) rather than parents (n = 39), (p = 0.001). We conclude that the presence of IgG insulin autoantibodies and CF-islet cell antibodies confer more risk for future development of diabetes than the presence of either marker alone.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
We have followed-up 35 islet cell antibody-positive first degree relatives of patients with Type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus for an average of 1,300 days with sequential intravenous glucose tolerance tests. At the time of analysis and manuscript submission approximately half (18 of 35) had developed diabetes during follow-up. At initial intravenous glucose tolerance test, 11 had a 1 + 3 min insulin secretion below the first percentile of insulin secretion compared to 225 similarly studied normal control subjects. Six islet cell antibody positive relatives on follow-up developed an intravenous glucose tolerance test less than the first percentile. Fifteen out of 17 (88%) of these islet cell antibody positive relatives with secretion ever found to be below the first percentile are now overtly diabetic (positive predictive value = 88%) and insulin-treated, while only 3 of 18 (17%) without an intravenous glucose tolerance test demonstrating loss of first phase insulin secretion have progressed to diabetes (with approximately 1,300 days of follow-up for both groups relative risk or odds ratio with intravenous glucose tolerance test ever below vs never below the first percentile = 38, p less than 0.001). Intravenous glucose tolerance test response below the first percentile preceded diabetes by an average of 656 days. Even when first phase insulin secretion is below the first percentile, the absolute value of 1 + 3 min insulin above basal insulin correlates with the time to development of diabetes (r = 0.586, p less than 0.001). With our current duration of follow-up, the negative predictive value (intravenous glucose tolerance test never below the first percentile) is 83%, and overall accuracy 86%. Incidence rates of diabetes development amongst our islet cell antibody positive relatives with follow-up while intravenous glucose tolerance test is below the first percentile is 0.48 per year (15 conversions to diabetes amongst 17 relatives in 30.8 patient years of follow-up) vs 0.05 per year (three diabetic patients in 55.5 patient years) with intravenous glucose tolerance test greater than the first percentile.