Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Intradermal Tests”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 433 records · Page 24Linked to original sources
PubMed1981

Intradermal drug testing following anaphylactoid reactions during anaesthesia.

Intradermal testing of intravenous anaesthetic drugs was performed on 34 patients following acute anaphylactoid reactions during anaesthesia. Twenty-three patients had positive skin tests and 18 of these were positive for a single drug. Muscle relaxants were the drugs implicated most commonly. Intradermal testing is safe and provides useful and often specific positive information, but false-negative results probably occur.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1983

Adverse reactions to suxamethonium and other muscle relaxants under general anesthesia.

The mechanisms of anaphylactic reactions to muscle relaxants under general anesthesia are not completely understood. Extending an earlier study, we report 41 cases of anaphylactic shock investigated by intradermal skin tests with muscle relaxants (suxamethonium, pancuronium, gallamine, nortoxiferine), in vitro leukocyte histamine release, and Prausnitz-Küstner tests. Intradermal tests were significantly positive at concentrations ranging from 10 to 10(5) times less than those in controls. Reproducibility tested for suxamethonium at a 1-year interval in five patients was good. Histamine release induced by muscle relaxants in Tris-albumin-Ca++-Mg++ buffer showed positive results in 8/25 instances and was inhibited by antigen excess in seven cases. Addition of 50% deuterium oxide (D2O) caused significant increase of histamine release in positive cases and induced release in all five negative cases studied. Muscle relaxant-induced histamine release was inhibited by in vitro anti-IgE leukocyte desensitization. The mean maximal histamine release dropped from 58.2% +/- 9.7 to 5.8% +/- 2 (p less than 0.01). Similarly, leukocyte desensitization also inhibited histamine release induced by anti-IgE but not by formyl-L-methionyl-L-leucyl-L-phenylalanine or poly-L-arginine. Prausnitz-Küstner tests were positive in five out of 21 cases studied and became negative after heat inactivation. These results confirm the usefulness of intradermal skin tests in diagnosis of patients' reaction to muscle relaxants and suggest an IgE-mediated rather than an idiosyncratic mechanism.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

A diagnostic protocol for evaluating nonimmediate reactions to aminopenicillins.

BACKGROUND: Maculopapular and urticarial rashes are nonimmediate manifestations common during aminopenicillin (AP) treatment, and the former often represent cell-mediated hypersensitivity. OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the significance and incidence of skin test reactions to APs in adults reporting adverse reactions during therapy with these beta-lactams and, particularly, to evaluate the potential of patch tests, delayed-reading skin tests, and challenges in the diagnosis of nonimmediate reactions. METHODS: We used skin tests with penicilloylpolylysine, minor determinant mixture, benzylpenicillin, ampicillin, and amoxicillin, as well as patch tests with the last 3 drugs. We also performed in vitro assays for specific IgE and challenges with the suspect penicillin in subjects with nonimmediate reactions. RESULTS: Among the 144 patients reporting nonimmediate manifestations (mostly maculopapular rashes), delayed hypersensitivity was diagnosed in 62 on the basis of positive patch test and/or delayed intradermal test results and responses to challenges; negative reactions to challenges allowed us to reasonably exclude the possibility of allergy in 66 subjects, and the challenge confirmed that 1 patient had linear IgA bullous dermatosis. Definitive diagnoses could not be provided for the remaining 15 subjects, who had negative allergologic test results, because they did not consent to challenges. In 40 of 49 immediate reactors, a diagnosis of IgE-mediated hypersensitivity was made. CONCLUSIONS: Both patch and intradermal tests are useful in evaluating nonimmediate reactions to APs. Positive patch test and delayed intradermal responses together indicate delayed hypersensitivity. Intradermal testing appears to be more sensitive than patch testing, but the pattern of positive delayed intradermal test responses and negative patch test responses needs further investigation because of false-positive cases.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1992

Pre- and post-treatment immunodiagnostic evaluation in human schistosomiasis mansoni.

Schistosomiasis control seems to be different in countries were low parasitic burden and asymptomatic clinical patients are the features of majority of cases. Immunological methods must substitute the traditional coprologic techniques used for some decades in the Control Program. Circumoval Precipitin Test (COPT), intradermal test and ELISA with soluble egg antigen (SEA) are evaluated for using as tools for seroepidemiologic studies. COPT and ELISA were performed after treatment to known their utility when impact of chemotherapy must be assessed. One hundred sixty five persons were followed up 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after treatment. The mean sensitivity of COPT studied by age groups was 95.6% which is very important considering that 88.4% of the studied population excreted less than 100 eggs/gr of feces, while sensitivity of intradermal test was 58.2%. Children showed the highest reactivity to COPT. When treatment is effective, COPT reactivity progressively diminish until become negative one year later. In the non cure group, the COPT reactivity diminished but never below 20%. ELISA-SEA did not modify one year after treatment. Effort should be made to isolate fractions of eggs of Schistosoma mansoni whose antibodies disappear after treatment.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

The importance of glycerin-containing negative control tests in allergy research studies that use intradermal skin tests.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess skin whealing with glycerin-containing control injections for intradermal skin tests. DESIGN: Observational. METHODS: Wheal sizes were measured at 0, 10, and 15 minutes after intradermal injection of 0.01 and 0.02 mL of phenolated normal saline and 0.5% and 5% concentrations of glycerin in the same quantity of phenolated saline. RESULTS: Intradermal injection of 0.01 mL of phenolated saline produced an average 4.9-mm wheal, which expanded to 5.2 mm at 10 minutes and to 6.0 mm at 15 minutes. Intradermal injection of 0.02 mL of phenolated saline produced a 6.4-mm wheal, which expanded to 7.0 mm at 10 minutes and 8.0 mm at 15 minutes. The addition of glycerin produced proportionally larger wheals. CONCLUSIONS: Because glycerin increases whealing beyond that with phenolated saline, skin tests containing glycerin must be compared with glycerin-containing negative controls. Intradermal skin tests that fail to compare findings in this manner contain an inherent methodologic flaw and are uninterpretable.

Bias↗
PubMed1990

Evaluation of skin test reactions in patients with non-immediate type drug eruptions.

Skin test reactions were evaluated in 242 patients who appeared to develop delayed type drug eruptions from the clinical course. The patch testing was positive in 62 (31.5%) of 197 patients tested and the intradermal testing in 105 (89.7%) of 117 patients. The positive ratios of intradermal testing were higher in maculopapular (MP), erythema multiforme (EM), and erythrodermic (ED) types than in eczematous (Ecz) type drug eruptions, while those of patch testing were comparatively high in ED, Ecz type, and anticonvulsant-induced drug eruptions. It is considered that the combination of patch testing and intradermal testing is useful for determination of causative drugs in delayed type drug eruptions.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2007

Reaction pattern to histamine and codeine in a human intradermal skin test model.

BACKGROUND: Skin prick and intradermal skin tests (IDT) are useful tools in evaluating IgE-mediated allergic disorders. In the literature, many variations of the techniques used are described. No general agreement exists on test procedures and reading of test results. OBJECTIVE: To analyse test conditions for IDT to facilitate comparability between different study protocols. METHODS: We tested 24 healthy volunteers with three concentrations of histamine and codeine each on the upper back, lateral upper arm and volar forearm, with/without addition of ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid. Reading of the resulting weal was performed by taking a digital image of the weal, later outlining the weal perimeter in triplicate and calculating the weal area using the NIH Image J software version 1.3. RESULTS: Weal size was dose dependent for both substances, generally larger on the upper back than on the forearm and upper arm, and larger after codeine than after histamine. Addition of the Ca2+ -chelator ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid did not significantly affect weal size. Weal size induced by histamine showed better consistency than that induced by codeine. CONCLUSIONS: The results and our technique provide valuable tools for the daily routine as well as for the ability to compare information of intradermal tests from different studies or clinical reports. When assessing skin reactivity, we recommend the use of 1 mg/mL codeine as well as 0.1 mg/mL histamine to reflect aspects of mast-cell releasability and of vascular reactivity. The involvement of local factors influencing the vascular reactivity or differences in opiate receptor density on mast cells surfaces needs to be addressed in future studies.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Prediction of residual immunity to smallpox, by means of an intradermal skin test with inactivated vaccinia virus.

BACKGROUND: Intradermal skin testing with inactivated vaccinia virus was evaluated for its prediction of residual immunity to smallpox. METHODS: An intradermal skin test was performed with heat-inactivated Lancy-Vaxina. Two days later, the subjects were vaccinated with Lancy-Vaxina. The skin lesions resulting from this vaccination were used as a surrogate marker of residual immunity to smallpox, and this surrogate marker was compared with the available indicators of susceptibility to smallpox. RESULTS: Of the 83 subjects, 30 (36%) showed the typical primary response after vaccination (i.e., absence of residual immunity), whereas 34 (41%) showed the typical revaccinee's response (i.e., presence of residual immunity); the remaining 19 (23%) had an indeterminate response and were excluded from the final analysis. The sensitivity and specificity of the intradermal skin test (induration size, >or=4 mm) for prediction of residual immunity to smallpox were 85% and 97%, respectively, whereas those of a positive vaccinia-specific interferon- gamma -producing T cell response (>or=9 spot forming cells/10(6) peripheral-blood mononuclear cells) were 32% and 63%, respectively, and those of a positive neutralizing antibody (titer, >or=1 : 8) were 79% and 80%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The intradermal skin test appears to be a simple and reliable method for prediction of residual immunity to smallpox.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

An assessment of the role of intradermal skin testing in the diagnosis of clinically relevant allergy to timothy grass.

BACKGROUND: Immediate skin testing is generally the preferred method for establishing the presence of allergy in clinical practice. There is no agreement, however, as to whether intradermal testing should be routinely performed if skin prick test results are negative. PURPOSE: The study was done to address the value of intradermal skin testing in the diagnosis of clinically significant sensitivity to grass pollen in patients exhibiting negative skin prick test responses to timothy extract. METHODS: Four groups were studied. Group I had a history of seasonal allergic rhinitis, negative skin prick test responses to timothy and Bermuda grass, but positive intradermal skin test responses to timothy grass. Group II had a history of seasonal allergic rhinitis and positive skin prick test responses to timothy grass. Group III had a history of seasonal allergic rhinitis but had negative responses to both prick and intradermal testing with timothy and Bermuda grass. Group IV had no history of rhinitis, had negative responses to skin testing with a panel of locally important allergens, as well as Bermuda and timothy grass, and had a serum IgE value of less than 20 IU/ml. Clinical sensitivity to grass was assessed by two methods: (1) nasal challenge with threefold increasing amounts of timothy pollen performed out of the pollen season and (2) correlation of subjects' daily symptom and medication scores with daily grass pollen counts during the grass pollen season. RESULTS: On the basis of nasal challenge with timothy grass, pollen allergic reactions were present in 11% of group I, 68% of group II, 11% of group III, and 0% of group IV. As determined by correlation of symptoms during the grass pollen season with grass pollen counts, 22% of group I, 64% of group II, 21% of group III, and 0% of group IV were considered allergic. If both criteria were required for a diagnosis of clinical allergy to grass, the percent positive was 0 for group I, 46 for group II, 0 for group III, and 0 for group IV. CONCLUSION: Under the conditions of this study the presence of a positive intradermal skin test response to timothy grass (1000 AU/ml) in the presence of a negative skin prick test response to timothy grass (100,000 AU/ml) did not indicate the presence of clinically significant sensitivity to timothy grass, and by inference, to other cross-reacting grasses.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Effect of tiletamine/zolazepam sedation on intradermal allergy testing in atopic dogs.

Seven atopic dogs underwent intradermal allergy testing with 46 inhalant antigens before and after administration of a tiletamine/zolazepam solution (4 mg/kg of body weight, IV). This anesthetic protocol had no significant effect on the intradermal response caused by histamine, whole flea extract, or various inhalant allergens. Short-acting chemical restraint induced by the drug combination facilitated the intradermal testing procedure.

Animals↗
PubMed1985

Contamination of intradermal skin test syringes.

Syringes used in intradermal skin testing have commonly been used for multiple patients. Recently the safety of this practice was questioned, raising the possibility that these syringes may transmit disease from one patient to another. Since this practice is so widespread and because of a scarcity of articles linking the spread of disease with this practice, we repeated these studies and performed other experiments to test this hypothesis. With the use of Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and tritiated thymidine, we found contamination of syringe contents that indicated a clear potential for common syringes to spread disease. These studies and studies reported elsewhere suggest that common syringes should not be used in skin testing.

Equipment Contamination↗
PubMed2002

Diagnosing nonimmediate reactions to penicillins by in vivo tests.

BACKGROUND: Maculopapular and urticarial rashes are nonimmediate manifestations common during penicillin treatment; the former often represent cell-mediated hypersensitivity. Our objectives were to assess the incidence of allergy in adults reporting nonimmediate manifestations during penicillin therapy and to evaluate the diagnostic potential of patch tests, delayed-reading skin tests and challenges in such cases. METHODS: We used prick and intradermal tests as well as patch tests with penicillin determinants, ampicillin, amoxicillin and any other suspect penicillins. We also performed challenges with the suspect antibiotics. RESULTS: Such antibiotics were aminopenicillins in 93.1% of 259 patients, most of whom had suffered from maculopapular rashes followed by piperacillin (4.2%). Three subjects displayed immediate skin test positivity. Ninety-four subjects showed patch test and delayed intradermal test positivity to the culprit penicillin (90 to aminopenicillins and 4 to piperacillin) and were considered as having had delayed hypersensitivity reactions. Five of the 8 subjects who displayed delayed intradermal test positivity and patch test negativity to the suspect penicillin underwent challenges, 2 reacted positively to the responsible aminopenicillin. Among the remaining 154 with negative results in allergologic tests, 125 agreed to undergo challenges; only 3 reacted. In all, 98 patients -- 93 of whom had experienced maculopapular rashes -- displayed delayed hypersensitivity (94 to aminopenicillins and 4 to piperacillin). CONCLUSIONS: Both patch and intradermal tests are useful in evaluating nonimmediate reactions to penicillins, particularly maculopapular rashes. Patch test and delayed intradermal positivity together indicate delayed hypersensitivity. Intradermal testing appears to be slightly more sensitive than patch testing.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Evaluation of a commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of allergen-specific IgE antibodies in dogs.

Twenty-eight atopic dogs, 22 pruritic, non-atopic dogs and 10 healthy dogs were ELISA tested. For calculations of diagnostic specificity and sensitivity, positive ELISA test results in non-atopic dogs were considered false positive results. The absence of any positive results in the atopic dogs was considered false negative results. The atopic dogs were tested both with ELISA and an intradermal test, utilising allergen extracts from the same manufacturer, to determine the frequency of positive allergen reactions in the ELISA test compared with the intradermal test. The Prausnitz-Küstner test was performed to evaluate the significance of a positive ELISA test result. Based on cross-tabulations with clinically defined atopic dermatitis, the ELISA test showed a sensitivity of 53.6% and a specificity of 84.4%. The correlation between the ELISA and the intradermal test was poor. Positive Prausnitz-Küstner tests were not obtained using sera from dogs that were intradermal test negative for the tested allergens, even though sera had high levels of IgE as measured by the ELISA. These findings question the significance of a positive ELISA test result and indicate that the test is not measuring functional allergen-specific IgE.

Allergens↗
PubMed1993

[Skin test reactivity to histamine in childhood].

One hundred twenty five allergic patients ranging in age from 0 to 36 years old (mean age 9 years) were tested. Intradermal skin tests were performed on the volar surface of the forearm by injection of a five-fold dilution of histamine dihydrochloride (from 1 x 5(-5) mg/ml to 1 x 5(-2) mg/ml). The wheal diameters increased incrementally with histamine concentration. The whealing capacity of the skin to histamine was found to be significantly lower in patients 0 to 5 years of age. There was no difference in the mean wheal size between patients 6 to 10 and 11 to 15 years of age. The wheal size in patients 16 to 36 years of age were significantly larger than those in the other age groups. The flare diameters also increased incrementally with histamine concentration. The mean diameter of flares was significantly lower in patients 0 to 5 years of age. Concentrations between 1 x 5(-3) mg/ml and 1 x 5(-2) mg/ml of histamine dihydrochloride should be taken for a positive control in intradermal allergen skin tests.

Adolescent↗