Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Histone Modifications”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 433 records · Page 24Linked to original sources

Isothiocyanate iberin modulates phase II enzymes, posttranslational modification of histones and inhibits growth of Caco-2 cells by inducing apoptosis.

The aim of presented study was to further investigate the concentration-dependent changes induced by isothiocyanate iberin (IBN) in human colon carcinoma Caco-2 cells. The concentrations of IBN below IC(50) value (18 microM, 72 h) triggered the augmentation of mRNA levels for phase II detoxification GSTA1 and UGT1A1 enzymes and antioxidant thioredoxin reductase 1 gene in cells treated for 24 h. In addition a significant increase of acetylated H4 histone was detected. The mRNA induction peaked at IC(50) value and returned to level of control cells at 40 microM concentration of IBN. The cell cycle changes, gamma-H2AX stainability and the increase of phospho-H3 mitotic marker were induced at concentrations above IC(50) value. Appearance of Annexin V positive apoptotic cells and sub-G1 fragmented DNA as well as decrease of mitochondrial transmembrane potential confirmed cytotoxic effect of IBN observed in MTT assay. The predominance of necrotic cells and profound positivity of gamma-H2AX took place at the highest concentration of IBN. Thus, IBN represents the effective member of natural chemopreventive isothiocyanate family with which apoptotic potential can by employed to eliminate tumor cells.

Acetylation↗

DNA repair-associated ADP-ribosylation in vivo. Modification of histone H1 differs from that of the principal acceptor proteins.

ADP-ribosylation in vivo of histone H1 was studied in hepatoma cells (Yoshida AH 7974) after treatment with the alkylating agent dimethyl sulfate for 30 min and compared with that of other polypeptides. In unstimulated cells, histone H1 was only a minor acceptor (less than 4%) of total monomeric and polymeric ADP-ribosyl residues. Induction of DNA repair by dimethyl sulfate treatment increased total mono(ADP-ribosyl) protein conjugates 1.6-fold whereas histone H1-linked mono(ADP-ribosyl) groups were elevated greater than 30-fold, thus accounting for nearly one-fourth of the net increase in monomeric ADP-ribosyl residues. In contrast, histone H1-associated poly(ADP-ribosyl) residues comprised only 2% of the total increase in poly(ADP-ribose). The extent to which the histone H1 population became ADP-ribosylated was low even in dimethyl sulfate-treated cells. Less than 2% of the histone H1 molecules were mono(ADP-ribosyl)ated and only 0.003% carried poly(ADP-ribosyl) chains when an average chain length of 10 is assumed. The principal polypeptide acceptors of alkylation-induced ADP-ribosylation were concentrated in two peaks, one migrating close to the position of core histones H3/H2B and accepting most of the induced mono(ADP-ribosyl) and poly(ADP-ribosyl) residues. The other (Mr = 110,000-160,000) resembled auto-modified poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. Our data demonstrate marked differences of alkylation-induced (ADP-ribosyl)n protein patterns to analyses performed in vitro.

Adenosine Diphosphate Ribose↗

Biochemical analysis of chromatin containing recombinant Drosophila core histones.

To investigate the effects of histone modifications upon chromatin structure and function, we studied the assembly and properties of chromatin that contains unmodified recombinant core histones. To this end, we synthesized the Drosophila core histones in Escherichia coli. The purified histones were lacking covalent modifications as well as their N-terminal initiating methionine residues. The recombinant histones were efficiently assembled into periodic nucleosome arrays in a completely purified recombinant system with Drosophila ATP-utilizing chromatin assembly and remodeling factor (ACF), Drosophila nucleosome assembly protein-1, plasmid DNA, and ATP. With the Gal4-VP16 activator and a crude transcription extract, we found that the transcriptional properties of ACF-assembled chromatin containing unmodified histones were similar to those of chromatin containing native histones. We then examined ACF-catalyzed chromatin remodeling with completely purified factors and chromatin consisting of unmodified histones. In these experiments, we observed promoter-specific disruption of the regularity of nucleosome arrays upon binding of Gal4-VP16 as well as nucleosome positioning by R3 Lac repressor and subsequent nucleosome remobilization upon isopropyl-beta-D-thiogalactopyranoside-induced dissociation of R3 from the template. Thus, chromatin assembly and remodeling by ACF can occur in the absence of histone modifications.

Animals↗

Epigenetic modifications at the human growth hormone locus predict distinct roles for histone acetylation and methylation in placental gene activation.

Developmental control of eukaryotic gene expression is tightly linked to alterations in chromatin structure. Studies of the hGH multigene cluster suggest that the four placental genes are activated by a pathway of histone modification distinct from the pathway leading to activation of the single pituitary hGH-N gene. The relationship between histone acetylation and hGH-N activation in the pituitary has been previously defined using a combination of epigenetic mapping and transgenic analyses. The repeated gene structures within the hGH cluster had been an impediment to comparable analysis of placental gene activation. In the present report we defined patterns of core histone acetylation and methylation within and flanking the hGH cluster in human placental chromatin. These data highlight differences between placental and pituitary pathways of transcriptional control at the hGH cluster and suggest that selective activation of the placental genes reflects distinct roles for histone acetyltransferase and histone methyltransferase coactivator complexes.

Acetylation↗

[Epigenetic modification in human leukemia].

Epigenetic modification, which involve DNA methylation, RNA-associated silencing and histone modification, is implicated in cell proliferation, differentiation, survival, apoptosis and malignant transformation. Some leukemogenesis has been shown to be aberrance of epigenetic modification. This paper discussed the potential causes of some of leukemias correlating with the methylation of cell cycle regulation genes, small interference RNA and modification abnormality of histone after translation. The study on epigenetic modification abnormality of leukemia cells provides a new strategy for treatment of leukemia.

DNA Methylation↗

Histone H3 lysine 4 dimethylation is enriched on the inactive sex chromosomes in male meiosis but absent on the inactive X in female somatic cells.

Inactivation of the X chromosome occurs in female somatic cells and in male meiosis. In both cases, the inactive X chromosome undergoes changes in histone modifications including deacetylation of core histone proteins and enrichment with histone H3 lysine 9 (H3-K9) dimethylation. In this study we show that while the inactive X in female somatic cells is largely devoid of H3-K4 dimethylation, the inactive X in male meiosis is enriched with this modification. However, the inactive X chromosome in female somatic cells and the inactive X and Y in male meiosis are devoid of H3-K4 trimethylation. Further, trimethylation of H3-K4 is present at discrete regions along most of the autosomes, while H3-K4 dimethylation shows a more homogenous staining. Also, the Y chromosome is largely devoid of H3-K4 di- and trimethylation in somatic cells of both humans and mice, however, the Y chromosome is enriched with H3-K4 di- but not trimethylation throughout spermatogenesis. Our results provide insights into the differences between female somatic cells and male germ cells in inactivating the X chromosome, and suggest that trimethylation, and not dimethylation, of H3-K4 is a more robust indicator of the active regions of the genome.

Animals↗

Methyl-CpG binding domain 1 (MBD1) interacts with the Suv39h1-HP1 heterochromatic complex for DNA methylation-based transcriptional repression.

Cytosine methylation and posttranslational modifications of the amino termini of the core histones in the nucleosome provide epigenetic codes for genome regulation. In the nucleus, not only is the DNA methylated, but the methylated DNA is also interpreted by methyl-CpG binding domain (MBD) proteins. MBD1 possesses an MBD involved in mediating DNA methylation-dependent transcriptional repression. The MBD of MBD1 binds a symmetrically methylated CpG sequence, but the precise roles of this domain have not been investigated. In addition, little is understood about the state of histone modifications within MBD1-containing heterochromatin on methylated gene promoters. Here we show that histone H3 methylase Suv39h1 and the methyl lysine-binding protein HP1 directly interact with MBD of MBD1 in vitro and in cells. Suv39h1 was found to enhance MBD1-mediated transcriptional repression via MBD but not via the C-terminal transcriptional repression domain of MBD1. Furthermore, MBD1 links to histone deacetylases through Suv39h1, resulting in methylation and deacetylation of histones for gene inactivation. These data indicate that MBD1 may tether the Suv39h1-HP1 complex to methylated DNA regions, suggesting the presence of a pathway from DNA methylation to the modifications of histones for epigenetic gene regulation.

Carrier Proteins↗

ChIPmentation for Epigenomic Analysis in Fission Yeast.

Histone modifications and transcription factor-DNA interactions regulate vital processes such as transcription, recombination, repair, and accurate chromosome segregation. Chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing (ChIP-Seq) has been instrumental in studying genome-wide distribution of DNA-bound or chromatin-associated factors and histone posttranslational modifications (PTMs). Here, we describe a ChIPmentation protocol adapted for fission yeast, Schizosaccharomyces pombe. This method merges Tn5 mediated tagmentation with existing ChIP protocols, resulting in lower sample input requirements with significant reduction in hands-on time and sample preparation costs.

Schizosaccharomyces↗

Ubiquitin ligase component Cul4 associates with Clr4 histone methyltransferase to assemble heterochromatin.

In eukaryotes, heterochromatin mediates diverse processes including gene silencing and regulation of long-range chromatin interactions. The formation of heterochromatin involves a conserved array of histone modifications; in particular, methylation of histone H3 at Lys 9 (H3K9me) is essential for recruiting HP1/Swi6 proteins. In fission yeast, the Clr4 methyltransferase is responsible for H3K9me across all heterochromatic domains. However, the mechanism of Clr4 recruitment to these loci is poorly understood. We show that Clr4 associates with Cul4, a cullin family protein that serves as a scaffold for assembling ubiquitin ligases. Mutations in Cul4 result in defective localization of Clr4 and loss of silencing at heterochromatic loci. This is accompanied by a severe reduction in H3K9me and Swi6 levels, and accumulation of transcripts corresponding to naturally silenced repeat elements within heterochromatic domains. Moreover, heterochromatin defects in Cul4 mutants could not be rescued by expression of Cul4 protein lacking Nedd8 modification, which is essential for its ubiquitin ligase activity. Rik1, a protein related to DNA damage binding protein DDB1 and required for H3K9me, also interacts with Cul4, the association of which might serve to target Clr4 to heterochromatic loci. These analyses uncover a role for Cul4-based protein ubiquitination in regulating H3K9me and heterochromatin formation.

Cell Cycle Proteins↗

Chromosome organization and chromatin modification: influence on genome function and evolution.

Histone modifications of nucleosomes distinguish euchromatic from heterochromatic chromatin states, distinguish gene regulation in eukaryotes from that of prokaryotes, and appear to allow eukaryotes to focus recombination events on regions of highest gene concentrations. Four additional epigenetic mechanisms that regulate commitment of cell lineages to their differentiated states are involved in the inheritance of differentiated states, e.g., DNA methylation, RNA interference, gene repositioning between interphase compartments, and gene replication time. The number of additional mechanisms used increases with the taxon's somatic complexity. The ability of siRNA transcribed from one locus to target, in trans, RNAi-associated nucleation of heterochromatin in distal, but complementary, loci seems central to orchestration of chromatin states along chromosomes. Most genes are inactive when heterochromatic. However, genes within beta-heterochromatin actually require the heterochromatic state for their activity, a property that uniquely positions such genes as sources of siRNA to target heterochromatinization of both the source locus and distal loci. Vertebrate chromosomes are organized into permanent structures that, during S-phase, regulate simultaneous firing of replicon clusters. The late replicating clusters, seen as G-bands during metaphase and as meiotic chromomeres during meiosis, epitomize an ontological utilization of all five self-reinforcing epigenetic mechanisms to regulate the reversible chromatin state called facultative (conditional) heterochromatin. Alternating euchromatin/heterochromatin domains separated by band boundaries, and interphase repositioning of G-band genes during ontological commitment can impose constraints on both meiotic interactions and mammalian karyotype evolution.

Animals↗

Control of transcription through intragenic patterns of nucleosome composition.

Several recent papers show that differences in histone modification and the use of histone variants at the 5' and 3' ends of genes influence the location and kinetics of transcriptional initiation. The ultimate target of most epigenetic mechanisms may be the regulation of nucleosome occupancy, which in turn controls access to DNA at specific genomic locations.

Animals↗

A conserved chromatin architecture marks and maintains the restricted germ cell lineage in worms and flies.

In C. elegans, mRNA production is initially repressed in the embryonic germline by a protein unique to C. elegans germ cells, PIE-1. PIE-1 is degraded upon the birth of the germ cell precursors, Z2 and Z3. We have identified a chromatin-based mechanism that succeeds PIE-1 repression in these cells. A subset of nucleosomal histone modifications, methylated lysine 4 on histone H3 (H3meK4) and acetylated lysine 8 on histone H4 (H4acetylK8), are globally lost and the DNA appears more condensed. This coincides with PIE-1 degradation and requires that germline identity is not disrupted. Drosophila pole cell chromatin also lacks H3meK4, indicating that a unique chromatin architecture is a conserved feature of embryonic germ cells. Regulation of the germline-specific chromatin architecture requires functional nanos activity in both organisms. These results indicate that genome-wide repression via a nanos-regulated, germ cell-specific chromatin organization is a conserved feature of germline maintenance during embryogenesis.

Animals↗