Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “GERIATRICS”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 433 records · Page 24Linked to original sources
PubMed2004

Variations in injury patterns, treatment, and outcome for spinal fracture and paralysis in adult versus geriatric patients.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis of hospital discharge and mortality data for spinal fracture and spinal cord injury patients in a single state from 1990 to 1995. OBJECTIVES: Population-based review of preinjury patient factors, injury and treatment patterns, and in-hospital versus 60-day mortality in adult and geriatric spinal injury patients. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: While population-based analyses of hospitalized injured patients indicate that geriatric patients are at higher risk for adverse outcome, less is known about the specific subset of patients with spinal fracture and spinal cord injury. A specific knowledge gap exists regarding factors that influence survival after hospital discharge of spine-injured patients. METHODS: Patients with cervical, thoracic, or lumbar spinal fracture were identified by ICD-9-CM discharge diagnosis codes. Age, gender, preexisting conditions, and injury severity were determined, and patients were divided into adult (ages 16-64 years; n = 6,029) and geriatric (ages >or=65 years; n = 3,973) groups. In-hospital and 60-day mortality rates and odds ratios of 60-day mortality were calculated relative to patient and injury characteristics, level of treating hospital, and surgical treatment. RESULTS: Increased 60-day mortality was associated with preexisting medical conditions, increased injury severity, and paralysis but reduced with surgical treatment. Geriatric patients had fewer cervical injures, lower force injuries, less severe overall injuries, decreased paralysis, increased preexisting conditions, decreased treatment at level 1 and 2 treatment centers, and decreased odds of surgical treatment. Geriatric patients also had increased 60-day versus in-hospital mortality and increased mortality associated with cervical spine injury. DISCUSSION: Differences exist in preinjury patient factors, injury and treatment patterns, and mortality between adult and geriatric patients following spinal injuries. The increased 60-day versus in-hospital mortality for the geriatric population suggests that 60-day mortality may be a better measure of outcome for these patients. While the possibility of selection bias exists, both geriatricand adult patients had reduced 60-day mortality associated with surgical intervention.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1984

The Sepulveda VA Geriatric Evaluation Unit: data on four-year outcomes and predictors of improved patient outcomes.

Data from its first four operating years indicate that the Sepulveda VA Geriatric Evaluation Unit is having consistent beneficial effects on patient care. These benefits include improved diagnostic accuracy, reduced use of drugs, improved functional status, and improved placement location. However, not all patients benefit equally, and differences between patient responses highlight the need to select those who will benefit most from relatively costly Geriatric Evaluation Unit services. Discriminant and regression analyses were performed on 98 consecutive patients to determine which patients admitted to the Geriatric Evaluation Unit would show greatest improvement in terms of placement, functional status, one-year survival, and living location, and which patients would be treated most efficiently in terms of length of stay. Patient characteristics on admission significantly associated with discharge home included a relatively high functional and cognitive status, the absence of an unstable medical problem, and not being expected to need nursing home placement by the referring physician. The latter two factors alone predicted actual placement location on the next 101 patients admitted to the Geriatric Evaluation Unit with high predictive accuracy (88.5 per cent). Factors predictive of patients whose functional status would improve on the Geriatric Evaluation Unit included absence of an unstable medical problem and being over 75 years old (predictive accuracy was 82.5 per cent). Two major factors associated with long patient stays on the Geriatric Evaluation Unit were low functional status scores and not living in own home or with family. These analyses indicate criteria that may be useful in selecting patients for inpatient geriatric evaluation and rehabilitation programs.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed2005

Efficacy of a comprehensive geriatric intervention in older patients hospitalized for hip fracture: a randomized, controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether an early multidisciplinary geriatric intervention in elderly patients with hip fracture reduced length of stay, morbidity, and mortality and improved functional evolution. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled intervention trial. SETTING: Orthopedic ward in a university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred nineteen patients aged 65 and older hospitalized for hip fracture surgery. INTERVENTION: Participants were randomly assigned to a daily multidisciplinary geriatric intervention (n=155) or usual care (n=164) during hospitalization in the acute phase of hip fracture. MEASUREMENTS: Primary endpoints were in-hospital length of stay and incidence of death or major medical complications. Secondary endpoints were the rate of recovery of previous activities of daily living and ambulation ability at 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS: Median length of stay was 16 days in the geriatric intervention group and 18 days in the usual care group (P=.06). Patients assigned to the geriatric intervention showed a lower in-hospital mortality (0.6% vs 5.8%, P=.03) and major medical complications rate (45.2% vs 61.7%, P=.003). After adjustment for confounding variables, geriatric intervention was associated with a 45% lower probability of death or major complications (95% confidence interval=7-68%). More patients in the geriatric intervention group achieved a partial recovery at 3 months (57% vs 44%, P=.03), but there were no differences between the groups at 6 and 12 months. CONCLUSION: Early multidisciplinary daily geriatric care reduces in-hospital mortality and medical complications in elderly patients with hip fracture, but there is not a significant effect on length of hospital stay or long-term functional recovery.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

A randomized controlled trial of the Geriatric Depression Scale in an inpatient ward for older adults.

OBJECTIVES: To measure the prevalence of high scores on the Geriatric Depression Scale in an inpatient unit for older people and assess whether administration of this instrument increased the use of antidepressant medication. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Inpatient unit for assessment, treatment and rehabilitation of older adults in a district hospital. SUBJECTS: Consecutive admissions to the inpatient unit were approached. Of 198 people, 100 gave consent and were randomized to receive the intervention. INTERVENTIONS: The Geriatric Depression Scale and the Folstein Mini-mental State Examination were administered to the intervention group. The Nottingham Instrumental Activities of Daily Living questionnaire and the Folstein Mini-mental State Examination were administered to the placebo group. The scores of these instruments and a copy of the completed instrument were placed in the subject's case notes. For those subjects randomized to receive the Geriatric Depression Scale an interpretation of the score was written in the case notes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was whether antidepressant medication was listed on the discharge summary for the admission. Other outcome measures were death, readmission and use of antidepressant medication three months after administration of the instruments. RESULTS: There was a prevalence of Geriatric Depression Scale scores greater than 10 of 52% in the 50 people administered this instrument. Six out of 46 people administered the Geriatric Depression Scale, who were discharged in the study period, were on antidepressant medication at discharge. Three out of 47 people administered the placebo instrument were on antidepressant medication at discharge. The absolute difference in proportions was 6.7%, 95% confidence interval 19 to -5.3%. CONCLUSIONS: A high proportion of patients admitted to an inpatient unit for assessment, treatment and rehabilitation scored in the depressed range on the Geriatric Depression Scale; however, use of the Geriatric Depression Scale in this clinical setting did not increase the use of antidepressant medication. This may be because the instrument is too nonspecific.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Senior citizen health conditions and hospitalization on geriatric, general and surgical floors, a population study conducted in Toledo].

BACKGROUND: The health condition and some clinical aspects configure a group of senior citizens in need of further care who could benefit from specialized geriatric care, although no consensus exists as to how to identify these patients. The aim of this study is to describe the profile of those patients over 64 years of age who are hospitalized in a geriatric unit and to compare this profile to the senior citizens hospitalized in general medical and surgical units. METHOD: A cohort representative of the population over age 64 in the Judicial District of Toledo (n = 3214) was studied over an eighteen-month period for the purpose of identifying the income and length of stays at the public hospitals in the health care district in question. The health condition-related variables were gathered by means of personal interviews, and the income and the different aspects thereof by way of hospital admissions department data. RESULTS: A total of 410 individuals were admitted (12.8%), 168 patients (30.7%) in geriatrics, 204 (37.3%) in medical units and 174 (32.0%) in surgical units. In geriatrics, the average age was significantly higher (age 77.4), there being no differences in the average length of stay (12.8 days; CI 95%) 10.6-14.0), 44 patients (8.1%) having died, 26 (59.1%) hospitalized in geriatrics. More females, younger patients having minor vision and hearing impairments were admitted to the surgical units. In geriatrics, as compared to the medical units, more patients over 80 years of age, living in senior citizen living facilities, having no spouse, moderate-to-severe functional dependence, impaired cognitive function, depression, poor quality of life and scanty social resources. CONCLUSIONS: No differences were found to exist between the health conditions of those over age 64 who were hospitalized in non-surgical and surgical units. In geriatrics, as compared to the other groups of units, the patients were older, in worse condition, had a higher death rate and similar average length of stay.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Profile of geriatric patients under DOTS in Revised National Tuberculosis Control Programme.

BACKGROUND: With an increase in life expectancy and the resultant elderly population, there has been an increase in the number of tuberculosis (TB) cases including those in geriatric age as well. However using Directly Observed Treatment-Short Course (DOTS), all categories of TB patients have been sucessfully treated within the country. A need was felt to study the profile of geriatric TB patients under the Revised National Tuberculosis Control Programme (RNTCP). METHODS: A retrospective study of 7439 patients enrolled under DOTS from January 1996 to March 2001 was carried out in a tertiary care referral institute in Delhi and the profile was analysed in terms of the gender, type of TB and ratio of sputum smear-positive to negative patients for both the younger and geriatric age groups. Further, treatment outcomes of the two age groups were analysed and compared for the 2655 new sputum smear patients. RESULTS: The male : female ratio of 315 geriatric TB patients enrolled under DOTS was observed to be 3 : 1 as against the 1.4 : 1 in younger TB patients. The occurrence of pulmonary TB was significantly higher than extra-pulmonary TB in geriatric age group (16:1) as compared to the younger age group (4:1). The ratio of new smear-positive to smear-negative patients was almost similar in the two age groups. Further, the treatment outcomes of new smear-positive geriatric TB patients in comparison to younger TB patients showed significantly lower sputum conversion (75.3% vs 85.7% respectively) and cure rates (69.2% vs 80.7% respectively), significantly higher exclusion rates from DOTS (2.3% vs 0.15% respectively) and relatively higher default and treatment failure rates. CONCLUSIONS: The present study has identified certain issues in the Indian TB patients of geriatric age. These include a lower reported prevalence amongst females, poor sputum conversion as well as cure rates and higher exclusion as well as default rates. Further studies are needed to address the issues under operational conditions of Indian RNTCP.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

[The impact of geriatric tuberculosis patients on the tuberculosis control strategy in China].

OBJECTIVE: To study the current status of geriatric tuberculosis (TB) and its impact on TB control program under the directly observed treatment short-course (DOTS) strategy in China. METHODS: Using the prevalence information regarding the epidemiology of geriatric TB from the National Random Survey in 2000, a case-control study was carried out to analyze the case detection, treatment and management of geriatric TB patients between DOTS area and non-DOTS area. RESULTS: The prevalence of sputum smear positive (SS+) in the age group of 65 or above was 440/100 000 which was 3.6 times of the average prevalence of SS+ of all age groups. Geriatric SS+ patients took up 28.8% of all the TB patients in 13 provinces with implementation of DOTS and 28.9% in 15 provinces without. The population of TB case in the age group 65 or above occupied 11.4% of all the newly registered SS+ case in 13 DOTS provinces from 1992 to 2000. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of geriatric SS+ was high. In both DOTS and non-DOTS areas, the proportion of geriatric SS+ was high but the registration rate of new SS+ was low among all the age groups. Both high prevalence and low case detection rate of geriatric TB became main issues to be under concern in the TB control strategy in China.

Age Factors↗
PubMed1992

Geriatric urinary incontinence.

Urinary incontinence (UI) is now recognized as a prevalent, physically and emotionally disruptive, and costly health problem in the geriatric population. Because incontinence may be a manifestation of a subacute or reversible process within or outside of the lower urinary tract, and because effective treatment is available, it is important for primary care physicians to identify and appropriately assess incontinence in their geriatric patients. The initial evaluation of an incontinent geriatric patients. The initial evaluation of an incontinent geriatric patient includes a targeted history and physical examination, urinalysis, and simple tests of lower urinary tract function. Potentially reversible conditions that may be causing or contributing to the incontinence, such as delirium and urinary tract infection (UTI), should be identified and managed. Patients who may benefit from further testing, including urologic or gynecologic examination and/or complex urodynamic tests, should be identified and referred. Several therapeutic modalities can be used to treat geriatric UI. Behavioral therapies are noninvasive and effective, both in functional community-dwelling geriatric patients and in functionally impaired nursing home residents. Behavioral therapies include bladder training, pelvic muscle exercises, biofeedback, scheduled toileting, habit training, and prompted voiding. Pharmacologic therapy is often used in conjunction with behavioral therapy. For stress incontinence, alpha-adrenergic drugs are used and can be combined with topical or oral estrogen therapy in women. For urge incontinence, pharmacologic treatment involves drugs with anticholinergic and direct bladder muscle relaxant properties. Pharmacologic therapy for overflow incontinence is generally not effective on a long-term basis. Surgical treatment is indicated when a pathologic lesion such as a tumor is diagnosed, or when anatomic obstruction is believed to be the cause of the patient's symptoms. Surgical treatment of stress incontinence can be highly effective in properly selected women. Nonspecific, supportive treatments are also important in managing geriatric UI. Education for patients and caregivers is critical for the success of most therapies. Environmental manipulations and the appropriate use of toilet substitutes are especially important in frail, functionally impaired patients. Highly absorbent adult undergarments are helpful for managing many patients, but should not be used as the initial response to incontinence, and are best used in conjunction with more specific treatment whenever possible. Chronic indwelling catheterization should only be used to manage incontinence when it is associated with clinically significant urinary retention, skin conditions that cannot heal because of incontinence, or severe illness that makes the catheter the most comfortable method of management.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Chiropractic and geriatrics: a review of the training, role, and scope of chiropractic in caring for aging patients.

Chiropractors may be well-positioned to play an important role in health promotion, injury and disease prevention, and on geriatric care teams, due to their practice style and holistic philosophy. The bottom line in aging care is that someone in the health-care world must provide health promotion and preventive services to older patients before the wave of aged patients profoundly overwhelms our health-care system. Chiropractic services are safe and relatively low-cost, and patient satisfaction with them is very high. In the managed-care environment, time pressures on allopathic providers may preclude them from spending sufficient time discussing health promotion and illness prevention with their patients. Chiropractic, when paid for out-of-pocket, is not as affected by these extreme pressures. With the hands-on nature of chiropractic care, a strong doctor-patient relationship is forged in which health and lifestyle recommendations may be comfortably and effectively discussed. Relative to musculoskeletal care in elderly patients, chiropractic adjustments (spinal manipulative therapy) are recommended by the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research for the care of acute low back pain, and the American Geriatric Society Panel Guidelines for the Management of Chronic Pain state that non-pharmaceutical interventions such as chiropractic may be appropriate. Most geriatric health-care providers have a limited number of options to offer patients with these complaints. Various lower-force chiropractic techniques are available as safe alternatives to drugs and surgery for musculoskeletal complaints in the older patient. Due to the prevalence of these conditions in older patients, and the success of chiropractic in caring for these patients, interdisciplinary geriatric health care teams should include the doctor of chiropractic. Chiropractors, well trained in health assessment, diagnosis, radiographic studies, health promotion, and illness prevention, are well-positioned to provide many primary health-care services to aging patients. This is particularly important to a nation that is straining to provide adequate geriatric health care in rural areas and areas with a shortage of health-care professionals. Continued improvements in geriatric education, and an increase in research and publication on chiropractic care of the aging patient are essential. As stated by Montes and Johnston in the Journal of Health Education: Training, as well as continual upgrading of the competencies for health educators, must include ways of dealing with the great disparities in health among populations, especially those most vulnerable and underserved. Faculty too must be prepared in ... this ever-changing health care delivery system. In a rapidly aging society, chiropractors, (along with all health professions)must prepare themselves to provide optimal health care to this important segment of our society, through excellence in chiropractic education, training,and practice.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Patient safety in geriatrics: a call for action.

Patient safety has become a major public health concern following the publication of the landmark report, To Err Is Human, by the Institute of Medicine in 1999. This report, along with a subsequent report, Crossing the Quality Chasm, recommended the design of a safer health care system by integrating well-established safety methods to avert medical errors. However, neither patient safety report specifically addressed the implications of safety for elderly patients. This article examines those implications by describing the association between aging and medical errors, identifying geriatric syndromes as medical errors, and focusing on six recommendations that will improve the safety of geriatric care. These six recommendations include the detection and reporting of geriatric syndromes, identifying system failures when geriatric syndromes occur, establishing dedicated geriatric units, improving the continuity of care, reducing adverse drug events, and improving geriatric training programs.

Aged↗
PubMed1994

Comprehensive geriatric assessment in a day hospital.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of comprehensive geriatric assessment conducted in day hospitals. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort comparison study with restricted inclusionary criteria and adjustment for baseline characteristics. SETTING: A hospital-based geriatric day hospital and geriatric clinic sites (both in the university and in the community). PATIENTS: Four hundred sixty-eight patients referred for comprehensive geriatric assessment during a 12-month period. INTERVENTION: Comprehensive geriatric assessment in a geriatric day hospital compared with assessment received in clinic sites without a day hospital. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Services received in the first 2 weeks; hospitalization, emergency room visits, placement, death, and change in selected health status measures. Follow-up data was obtained from medical records, a telephone survey, and death certificates. RESULTS: Except in the case of rehabilitative services, day hospital patients were more likely to receive interdisciplinary services. The population seen in the day hospital was more functionally impaired and had significantly more dementia and depression. After adjusting for subjects' baseline characteristics and limiting the analyses to subjects meeting specific inclusionary criteria, the day hospital had no significant effect on mortality, use of emergency or hospital services, placement, or change on selected measures of health status. For example, compared with the clinic patients, receiving care in the day hospital was associated with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.01 (95% confidence interval: 0.53, 1.91) of being at a higher level of care at 6 months. The results were not sensitive to the choice of inclusionary criteria. CONCLUSION: Given their cost and uncertain effectiveness, day hospitals need additional evaluation before their further diffusion occurs.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed2003

A research agenda for geriatric emergency medicine.

OBJECTIVES: The Research Agenda Setting Process (RASP), part of the American Geriatric Society's (AGS's) project "Increasing Geriatric Expertise in Surgical and Related Medical Specialties," was designed to define a research agenda for the geriatrics aspects of participating specialties. This paper presents a summary of the research agenda for emergency medicine. METHODS: The RASP was developed by the AGS in conjunction with experts from the participating specialty organizations. A "content expert" (CE) for each specialty developed a Medline search strategy in conjunction with RAND Health librarians. The CE reviewed the search to identify papers that were germane to research in the emergency care of older patients. The CE and a senior writing group member drafted a paper that synthesized the current literature and suggested areas for further research. A panel consisting of AGS members and emergency physicians with geriatrics expertise reviewed this paper. The research agenda was further refined at a two-day retreat. Two senior geriatricians reviewed the resulting paper. RESULTS: The Medline search for emergency medicine resulted in a list of 3,348 articles; 299 articles were pertinent and reviewed. The search for trauma resulted in a list of 1,838 articles; 133 were reviewed. Research agenda items were defined for multiple topics within geriatric emergency medicine and trauma. CONCLUSION: A research agenda for geriatric emergency medicine has been developed, using a combination of review of current literature and expert opinion.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

[Regional geriatric team--a model for cooperation between nursing homes and hospitals].

Few studies describe and evaluate the use of ambulatory geriatric teams in nursing homes. This article gives an account of a model in which a multidisciplinary group from the local hospital has been visiting 17 communities in Norway twice a year for 11 years. The ambulatory geriatric team includes a geriatrician, a geriatric nurse, a physiotherapist and an occupational therapist. Their aim is to raise the quality of geriatric assessment and care and to enhance the cooperation between the hospital and the nursing homes in the communities. The team members are doing a comprehensive geriatric assessment of some of the patients; they assess cases for further referral, and examine patients with declining functioning with a view to rehabilitation. The team provides instruction in various aspects of geriatrics to community care professionals. Much time is devoted to discussions on problems raised by the staff, such as management of patients with dementia-related behavioural problems, and to provide feedback to staff-members. The team liaise between hospitals, nursing homes and community care services in the communities in order to enhance communication between the professionals involved. An evaluation of the team was done on behalf of the National Institute of Health through a postal questionnaire which was returned by 223 doctors, nurses and allied health care professionals. The results indicate that visits by the ambulatory team improve the knowledge of doctors and allied professionals about diseases in the elderly; 92% reported that they now felt they were doing a better job.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[The geriatric university clinic].

The very old are the fastest growing population group. Medical progress allows more autonomy and better quality of life for the elderly. Traditional medical concepts are, however, only partly suited for dealing with age-associated problems. Medical education responds to these new requirements in a limited way. Interdisciplinary teamwork is a prerequisite in treating the multimorbid, acutely ill elderly patient. The task of the university is not only the development and implementation of high-tech medicine, but first of all a comprehensive training in medicine, including geriatrics. The Geriatric University Clinic therefore offers pre- and postgraduate training in geriatrics, but also in related disciplines by promoting teaching and research. In order to attain these goals, the geriatric acute ward was created for acutely ill, very old, multimorbid, frail elderly patients. A geriatric ward for rehabilitation complements this ward. A consultation service offers geriatric know-how to all other services. A special task is the early diagnosis and treatment of dementia in an outpatient service. The aim is to prevent chronification by early intervention and to reestablish satisfactory function and autonomy.

Aged↗
PubMed1997

[Prevalence rate, place of hospitalization and source of referral of complex nursing care patients in geriatric hospitalization].

For the past several years, the hospitalization and care of complex nursing care patients (CNCP) has caused concern among organizers, funders and care-givers of the geriatric hospitalization system (GHS). To assist in improving efficiency of the GHS and to address the lack of comprehensive, empirical and up-to-date information on these patients, we conducted a survey to characterize CNCP, to assess their medical problems and to determine their prevalence among the patients in GHS. The survey was conducted in 1994 using a day census. Data were collected on the 2,319 patients in geriatric beds in all the general hospitals and geriatric hospitals in Israel on the day of the survey. 28% of the patients in the GHS were CNCP and a quarter of them (7% of all patients) suffered from more than 1 medical condition. Tube feeding was the most prevalent condition (13% of all patients), followed by terminal illness (9%), deep pressure sores (7%) and intravenous transfusion for more than 3 days (6%). The 80% of the CNCP were hospitalized in geriatric hospitals, primarily in geriatric rehabilitation wards. Their average length of stay was over a year. Internal medicine wards of general hospitals were the most frequent source of patient referral. The survey's findings raise issues related to the organization of care of CNCP. They may serve as a basis for the reorganization of the geriatric hospitalization system in order to improve efficiency and quality of care for the benefit of patients, their families and services providers.

Aged↗
PubMed1997

The opportunities and challenges of geriatric rehabilitation--a success story.

The rehabilitation philosophy of promoting function and independence should be the backbone of gerontological nursing practice. The attitudes and skills of nurses determine the rehabilitation climate for geriatric patients. Nurses need to be aware of the principles of geriatric rehabilitation nursing. The Geriatric Rehabilitation Program at Joseph Brant Memorial Hospital has not only acknowledged and enhanced the knowledge and skills of nursing staff, but has also raised awareness that geriatric rehabilitation is possible. It has also provided a structure in which nurses can practise geriatric rehabilitation nursing. Mrs. C. is a wonderful example of what this kind of program can do for patients. The face of rehabilitation nursing is changing, and it is time to turn the challenges of geriatric rehabilitation into opportunities for our patients, their families, and ourselves.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed1997

[Selection of patients for geriatric treatment--a quality assurance project].

Numerous patients admitted to acute hospitals for emergency treatment are elderly, 75 years and above. These patients often have multiple diseases and severe functional limitations and disabilities. Trials have shown that geriatric assessment programmes carried out in hospital settings improve the prognosis of survival, and can prevent or postpone functional decline. However, correct selection of patients is necessary in order to succeed. The aim of this development project was to describe how a geriatric team could screen hospital in-patients for geriatric treatment. The characteristics of 102 patients selected for geriatric treatment were compared to the criteria for a geriatric patient as defined by Laake. There was a high level of agreement between the global clinical assessment made by the geriatric team and Laake's criteria.

Geriatric Assessment↗
PubMed2001

Psychometric properties of the state part of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) in geriatric patients.

BACKGROUND: A conspicuously high score on the state part of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) has been observed among geriatric inpatients who are neither demented nor critically ill; 43% of them had a sumscore that, according to Spielberger's criteria, would reflect clinically relevant anxiety symptoms. OBJECTIVES: To explore the reasons for this high score. METHODS: 101 geriatric inpatients and 68 healthy controls of similar age, living at home and recruited through senior citizen centres participated in a controlled cross-sectional study. RESULTS: High item-scores were more frequent on the symptom-negative items than on the symptom-positive items. Multi-group factor analysis produced two factors termed 'well-being' and 'nervousness', which had a moderate correlation (0.61). The intercept was much higher on 'well-being' than on 'nervousness', showing that a lack of well-being contributes significantly to the high score on the STAI. This confounds the sumscore. However, the geriatric inpatients nevertheless had a high score on the factor 'nervousness'. Female controls scored higher than males on both factors, whereas among the geriatric patients neither age nor gender related to them. CONCLUSIONS: The STAI state sumscore is a biased indicator of anxiety in geriatric inpatients owing to confounding by well-being. The most important cause for the observed high score on the STAI state instrument in geriatric patients relates to a reduced well-being.

Aged↗