PubMed1990
The surface roughness and the coefficients of friction were measured for sixteen arch wire-bracket combinations. The sample included one rectangular arch wire product from each of the four principal alloy groups and one bracket product from among the stainless steel and polycrystalline alumina inventory. Although subsamples representing both the 0.018-inch and the 0.022-inch slot sizes were evaluated, no differences were observed in their rankings. When tested over a series of eight incident angles, the optical surface roughness of representative stainless steel and alumina brackets averaged 0.148 and 0.193 microns, respectively. After testing at a single angle (82 degree) and referencing a nomogram, the roughness of the stainless steel, cobalt-chromium, beta-titanium, and nickel-titanium arch wire surfaces averaged 0.053, 0.129, 0.137, and 0.247 microns, respectively. When the various arch wire-bracket couples were pressed against an 0.010-inch stainless steel ligature wire at 34 degrees C and otherwise prevailing atmospheric conditions, the coefficients of friction ranged from stainless steel (lowest) to cobalt-chromium, nickel-titanium, and beta-titanium (highest)--regardless of bracket product or slot size. These results corroborated earlier observations in which the same arch wire products were drawn between stainless steel or alumina contact flats. In the current research, the average coefficient of kinetic friction for the stainless steel couple (0.139) was less than that for the stainless steel arch wire against a polycrystalline alumina bracket (0.174).