Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “ENDOSCOPY”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 433 records · Page 24Linked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

Teaching surgical endoscopy of the gastrointestinal tract.

Surgical endoscopy, or the utilization of endoscopic techniques in the diagnosis and treatment of surgical disease, is an integral part of the practice of modern gastrointestinal surgery and the training of surgical residents. In addition to information crucial to preoperative evaluation and postoperative surveillance, endoscopy offers alternative therapeutic and complementary intraoperative options. Surgical endoscopy can be taught as part of an integrated residency experience, a separate endoscopy rotation, a postresidency fellowship, or an individually-arranged preceptorship. Each method of teaching has relative advantages and disadvantages. The 3 surgical endoscopy training programs with which the authors have been associated include an integrated experience, a separate endoscopy rotation followed by an integrated experience, and a preceptorship followed by an integrated experience.

Digestive System Surgical Procedures↗
PubMed1994

Sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a comparison of alfentanil-midazolam and meperidine-diazepam.

The authors studied the efficacy and cost of substituting sedation using midazolam and alfentanil for the existing regimen of diazepam and meperidine in patients requiring upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Sixty consenting subjects were randomized to receive either meperidine 50 mg with diazepam approximately 90 micrograms.kg-1 (Group D) or alfentanil 250 micrograms with midazolam approximately 50 micrograms.kg-1 (Group M). Endoscope insertion time, patient acceptance, apnoeic or desaturation episodes were noted by a physician observer. Pulse oximetry was used to monitor heart rate and oxygen saturation (SpO2) during endoscopy. Subjects performed four-choice reaction time (4CRT) tests before, 30 and 60 min after endoscopy, and were assessed for nausea or dizziness and their ability to stand and walk. During endoscopy, insertion time was shorter (84 +/- 45 sec vs 122 +/- 83 sec, P < 0.03) and fewer aversive movements occurred (0.4 +/- 0.6 vs. 1.7 +/- 2.4, P < 0.005) in Group M than Group D. No subject in either group suffered any apnoea or prolonged desaturation requiring supplemental oxygen. Irrespective of treatment group, greater decreases in SpO2 (6.1 +/- 3.4% vs 3.6 +/- 2.2% P < 0.001) occurred in subjects > 45 yr of age than in subjects < or = 45 yr. During recovery 4CRT values at 30 min after endoscopy were longer (723 +/- 226 msec vs 594 +/- 139 msec, P < 0.005) in Group M than in Group D but not after 60 min. It was concluded that the small differences in endoscopy conditions and greater sedation during the first 30 min of recovery did not justify the additional cost of using midazolam and alfentnil.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Age Factors↗
PubMed2005

Bowel magnetic resonance imaging of pediatric patients with oral mannitol MRI compared to endoscopy and intestinal ultrasound.

The purpose of this study was to assess the sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in pediatric patients with clinical suspicion of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) by comparing MRI and ultrasound (US) to endoscopy, the gold standard. A median volume of 300 ml of mannitol in a 15% [corrected] watery solution were ingested by 43 children prior to examination. The 53 MRI examinations were compared with 20 endoscopies and 41 US of the terminal ileum. The outcomes were MRI quality; pathologic findings; level of adverse events; and concordance between endoscopy, MRI, and US estimated by kappa statistics. The ileum and terminal ileum were very good or excellently imaged in approximately 80% of cases. Wall thickening and enhancement were most frequent in the terminal ileum. MRI compared with endoscopy had a sensitivity of 81.8% [95% confidence interval (CI)], specificity of 100%, diagnostic accuracy of 90%, and kappa value of 0.80 (95% CI), indicating a good degree of concordance. A similar degree of concordance was achieved between US and endoscopy. In spite of the frequent adverse reactions, such as diarrhea and nausea, half of the patients were prepared to repeat the examination. The results of MRI are concordant with endoscopy and US of the terminal ileum.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2002

Diagnostic work-up of socially unacceptable snoring. II. Sleep endoscopy.

In the diagnostic work-up of socially unacceptable snoring (SUS) with or without a history suggestive of obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS), information on the severity of the pathology as well as on local and general causative factors is needed. In part I of this study, we reported on the findings recorded in 380 patients by means of sleep registration. In this part, our emphasis is on analysis of the local contributing factors. In 340 of the 380 patients sleep endoscopy was performed to establish the level(s) of obstruction as accurately as possible. Sleep endoscopy was performed following artificial induction of sleep with midazolam and consisted in endoscopy and flexible nasopharyngoscopy and laryngoscopy. Although obstruction at the oropharyngeal level was often present, obstructions at lower levels or at multiple levels were also frequently found. In many cases sleep endoscopy showed obstruction at different level(s) than had been suspected on the grounds of ear nose and throat (ENT) investigation only. An obstruction at only one level was recorded in 35% of the patients (119), while 65% of patients (221) had multiple-level obstruction. The level(s) of obstruction could be well established by sleep endoscopy. We conclude that a diagnostic work-up involving a combination of sleep registration, sleep endoscopy, and analysis of general factors is worthwhile. Combining the results of these tests makes it possible to give individually tailored advice on treatment.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Capsule endoscopy versus push enteroscopy for evaluation of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding with 1-year outcomes.

Because of the low diagnostic yield of standard radiologic tests for identifying sources of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding in the small intestine, we compared wireless video capsule endoscopy with push enteroscopy and small-bowel follow-through. Patients referred to Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, between August and December 2001 for evaluation of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding were potential candidates. Eligible patients had previously inconclusive endoscopy, colonoscopy, small-bowel follow-through, and other radiologic studies. Participants underwent capsule endoscopy and enteroscopy (within 24 hr). The primary end point was localization of any bleeding source, with 1-year telephone follow-up. Capsule endoscopy yielded positive findings in 10 of 20 patients (11 men; mean age, 69 years), 6 of whom had negative enteroscopy and small-bowel follow-through. No patient with negative findings on capsule endoscopy had positive findings on enteroscopy and small-bowel follow-through. At follow-up, 19 patients reported fewer transfusions, gastrointestinal procedures, and hospitalizations. Capsule endoscopy identified more lesions and improved outcomes.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Capsule endoscopy in patients with chronic abdominal pain.

BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic abdominal pain consult gastroenterologists frequently, requiring a large number of examinations. AIM: To assess the diagnostic yield of capsule endoscopy in patients with chronic abdominal pain of unknown origin and negative diagnostic work-up. PATIENTS: From January 2002 to September 2004, 16 patients (10 female; mean age 42.7 years) who complained of chronic abdominal pain were referred to our unit for capsule endoscopy. METHODS: Chronic abdominal pain was defined as continuous or almost continuous, for at least 3 months and without criteria for other gastrointestinal disorders. All patients had a previous diagnostic work-up including abdominal ultrasonography, oesophagogastroduodenoscopy, colonoscopy and small bowel follow through, performed within 2 months. RESULTS: Capsule endoscopy was normal in 12 patients (75%). Small bowel abnormalities were found in three patients, but were considered irrelevant. In one patient (6.3%), capsule endoscopy revealed ileal erosions and inflammation and was retained in a stricture undetected by radiology. This patient underwent elective surgery which revealed an ileal carcinoid neoplasm. CONCLUSIONS: Capsule endoscopy identified a specific cause of chronic abdominal pain in only one patient. Capsule endoscopy is a safe procedure but does not seem to play an important role in the evaluation of patients with chronic abdominal pain of unknown origin.

Abdominal Pain↗
PubMed2006

Capsule endoscopy: where are we after 6 years of clinical use?

Capsule endoscopy has revolutionised the management of digestive tract diseases by providing a new non-invasive way to view the entire small bowel mucosa directly. Obscure gastrointestinal bleeding is the primary and best validated indication to capsule endoscopy, which when used as first-line exploration is the most efficient strategy as regards diagnosis. In these patients, the technique is also helpful for effective decision-making concerning subsequent treatments. There is significant uncertainty regarding the role of capsule endoscopy in patients with Crohn's disease. Although it is clearly more sensitive than conventional imaging modalities, the implications of the lesions identified with this technique are not fully understood. Further prospective studies are required to identify the clinical settings where capsule endoscopy is most effective in these patients. Capsule endoscopy may potentially lead to diagnosis of small bowel tumours earlier in their course; it should be used as first-line surveillance procedure in patients with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, and it may be of clinical value in selected patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Although preliminary results are promising, additional research is necessary to determine its role in the diagnosis and management of coeliac disease, as well as for the diagnosis of oesophageal and large bowel disorders. Well-designed studies are also needed to better define the impact of capsule endoscopy on health care use and clinical outcome of patients with intestinal diseases.

Adenomatous Polyposis Coli↗
PubMed2006

Colorectal cancer screening: recommendations and guideline adherence by physicians from digestive endoscopy centers in the Lazio region, Italy.

INTRODUCTION: Endoscopy plays a key role in colorectal cancer screening; at the beginning of a mass screening campaign, it is important for public health officials to assess physicians' attitudes and adherence to guidelines regarding colorectal cancer screening. METHODS: In April 2004, a questionnaire was sent to all 80 digestive endoscopy centers in the Lazio region, identified by the annual census of the Italian Society of Digestive Endoscopy. The results were compared to those from a similar survey of general practitioners (GPs). RESULTS: Seventy-one centers (89%) returned the questionnaire. Only 3% of physicians said they did not recommend any colorectal cancer screening test. Colonoscopy was perceived as the most effective screening test and was the most recommended (80%). Fecal occult blood test was recommended by 61% of physicians and flexosigmoidoscopy by 11%. Endoscopy centers' physicians recommend screening more than GPs (96.9% vs. 78.3%), while they have a similar level of over-recommending (50.8% vs. 47.2%). Almost 95% of endoscopy physicians properly recommended colonoscopy after positive FOBT. CONCLUSIONS: Neither physicians at endoscopy centers nor GPs tend to follow screening guidelines. Screening programmes should not rely on a single medical specialist, but on interdisciplinary management of the disease to strengthen adherence to existing guidelines.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed1995

Periprocedural myocardial ischemia in patients with severe symptomatic coronary artery disease undergoing endoscopy: prevalence and risk factors.

PURPOSE: To determine the prevalence of and risk factors for periprocedural myocardial ischemia associated with gastrointestinal endoscopy in patients with severe symptomatic coronary artery disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective observational study, myocardial ischemia (ST segment change > 100 microV in any 2 leads or > 200 microV in any 1 lead, lasting > 60 seconds) was assessed using a continuous 12-lead digital electrocardiographic monitor before, during, and after gastrointestinal endoscopy. RESULTS: Between June 1992 and May 1993, 1,084 esophagogastroduodenoscopies and 588 colonoscopies were performed during 1,438 consecutive endoscopies on patients admitted to a university hospital. Seventy (18%) of 252 patients with prior angiography had significant coronary artery disease. Fifty-two (74%) were successfully enrolled, and satisfactory electrocardiographic recordings were obtained from 49 (median age 65 years, interquartile range 58 to 74). Thirty-six were men, 12 had myocardial infarctions within the 6 weeks (median 12.5 days, interquartile range 8 to 18), and 25 had unstable angina. The coronary artery disease involved 1 vessel in 14 subjects, 2 vessels in 21, and 3 vessels in 14. Nineteen episodes of ischemia (4 pre-, 6 intra-, 9 postprocedure) were detected in 8 patients (16%; 95% confidence interval, 6% to 26%) during the recording period (median duration 322 min, interquartile range 227 to 429). One patient became symptomatic with a myocardial infarction. Multivariable logistic regression showed that women experienced more periprocedural ischemia compared to men (31% versus 11%; P = 0.058). CONCLUSIONS: Myocardial ischemia occurs during the periprocedural period in 16% of hospitalized patients with severe coronary artery disease undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endoscopy is safe in hemodynamically stable patients with recent myocardial infarction and/or unstable angina. Women appear to be at greater risk for periprocedural ischemia associated with endoscopy.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Detection of intestinal metaplasia in distal esophagus and esophagogastric junction by enhanced-magnification endoscopy.

BACKGROUND: Standard videoendoscopy identifies columnar-lined esophagus but cannot distinguish intestinal metaplasia from other types of epithelium. Enhanced-magnification endoscopy identifies different mucosal pit patterns. A preliminary study suggested that a type 3 pattern is associated with the presence of intestinal metaplasia. This study assesses the value of enhanced-magnification endoscopy for the detection of intestinal metaplasia in the distal esophagus and esophagogastric junction in patients undergoing diagnostic EGD. METHODS: Patients undergoing diagnostic endoscopy for upper-GI symptoms underwent enhanced-magnification endoscopy after instillation of 1.5% acetic acid. The enhanced-magnification endoscopy mucosal pattern was classified into 3 types: 1, normal pits; 2, slit-reticular pattern; and 3, gyrus-villous pattern. Preliminary studies indicated that the type 3 pattern was related to intestinal metaplasia. One to 6 biopsies were targeted to areas having a type 3 pattern in columnar-appearing mucosa in the distal esophagus or esophagogastric junction. In the absence of type 3 pattern, one to 8 biopsies were targeted to areas with a type 2 pattern in columnar-appearing mucosa in the distal esophagus or esophagogastric junction. RESULTS: The overall frequency of intestinal metaplasia in the esophagus and esophagogastric junction was 38.8% (26/67 patients). There was a good correlation between the type 3 pattern and intestinal metaplasia in targeted biopsy specimens (sensitivity 88.5%, specificity 90.2%, positive predictive value 85.2%, negative predictive value 92.5%, overall accuracy 90.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Enhanced-magnification endoscopy is useful for detection of intestinal metaplasia in distal esophagus and esophagogastric junction.

Acetic Acid↗
PubMed2004

Tele-endoscopy: a way to provide diagnostic quality for remote populations.

BACKGROUND: Flexible endoscopy plays an important role in digestive health. However, access to endoscopy is limited in many rural areas throughout the world. Training non-physician personal to perform diagnostic endoscopy and to transmit images to a central hospital, where experienced endoscopists can review the procedures, may improve digestive health for patients in remote areas. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic quality and accuracy of upper-GI tele-endoscopy. METHODS: Fifty patients scheduled for EGD underwent upper-GI tele-endoscopy. The procedures were observed simultaneously by the endoscopist and a gastroenterologist observing from a remote station connected by 4 integrated services digital network telephone lines. The interpretation of the findings by both were compared and concordance for diagnosis of major and minor lesions was analyzed. RESULTS: Tele-endoscopic image quality was adequate to support diagnosis of abnormal lesions by the remote observer. Technical issues included worsening image quality caused by mild pixelation during rapid endoscope movement and rare loss of the telephone lines. The endoscopist identified 47 different major and 44 minor findings in the 50 patients. The observer missed one major lesion (columnar-lined esophagus) because of suspected inflammation and described 10 non-existing major lesions (sensitivity 98%: 95% CI[89%, 99%], specificity 80%: 95% CI[66%, 90%]). Some of the differences were because of interobserver variability. CONCLUSIONS: Upper-GI tele-endoscopy by using telephone lines has good diagnostic quality and is highly sensitive with regard to major findings. The misinterpretation of certain findings (esophageal ring, gastric erosions) may be caused by interobserver variability. The data strongly suggest that endoscopist and observer see similar endoscopic views.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Can clinical features predict the likelihood of finding abnormalities when using capsule endoscopy in patients with GI bleeding of obscure origin?

BACKGROUND: Capsule endoscopy is becoming the investigation of choice for GI bleeding of obscure etiology. This study examined whether clinical or other features predict an increased likelihood of finding a lesion in patients with this type of bleeding. METHODS: Clinical and other data were collected prospectively for 92 patients undergoing capsule endoscopy for GI bleeding of obscure origin. Patients were divided into two groups: those with overt bleeding (42 patients) and those with anemia alone (50 patients). The relationship between these data and the findings at capsule endoscopy was examined. RESULTS: A definite or probable cause of bleeding was found in 60 patients (angiodysplasias 47, tumor 7, ulcer 3, gastric antral vascular ectasia 2). There was no difference between the two groups with respect to age, gender, mode of presentation, duration of bleeding, or need for transfusion. Lesions were found as often in patients who had only one preceding endoscopy and colonoscopy as in those who had multiple procedures. Colonic cleansing and cecal imaging by the capsule did not influence the result. Hospitalized patients were more likely to have an actively bleeding lesion detected. CONCLUSIONS: Capsule endoscopy is equally useful in patients with overt and occult GI bleeding of obscure origin. Capsule endoscopy should be performed early in the evaluation of these patients.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Diagnosis of small-bowel varices by capsule endoscopy.

BACKGROUND: Capsule endoscopy is being used increasingly to investigate GI bleeding of obscure origin and disorders of the small bowel. METHODS: Four cases of small-bowel varices of various etiologies diagnosed by capsule endoscopy are described: a bleeding small-bowel varix because of hepatic portal hypertension, oozing small-bowel anastomotic or adhesion-related varices, small-bowel varices secondary to mesenteric vein thrombosis, and "idiopathic intestinal varices." OBSERVATIONS: Over a 12-month period, small-bowel varices were found in 4 of 46 patients (8.7%) who underwent capsule endoscopy for GI bleeding. Fresh blood adjacent to the varices was documented in 3 patients. The small-bowel varices had serpiginous or nodular shapes, with or without a bluish coloration. The variceal mucosa appeared mosaic-like, shining, or normal compared with surrounding mucosa. CONCLUSIONS: Capsule endoscopy is invaluable for the diagnosis of small-bowel varices. It is highly sensitive for detection of fresh blood in the small bowel. Clinical suspicion, capsule endoscopy image recognition, and alertness during capsule endoscopy interpretation are keys to diagnosis.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Is routine sedation or topical pharyngeal anesthesia beneficial during upper endoscopy?

BACKGROUND: Upper endoscopy is an invasive procedure. However, the benefits of routinely administered sedative medication or topical pharyngeal anesthesic are controversial. The aim of this study was to clarify their effects on patient tolerance and difficulty of upper endoscopy. METHODS: A total of 252 patients scheduled for diagnostic upper endoscopy were randomly assigned to 4 groups: (1) sedation with midazolam and placebo pharyngeal spray (midazolam group), (2) placebo sedation and lidocaine pharyngeal spray (lidocaine group), (3) placebo sedation and placebo pharyngeal spray (placebo group), and (4) no intravenous cannula/pharyngeal spray (control group). The endoscopist and the patient assessed the procedure immediately after the examination. Another questionnaire was sent to the patients 2 weeks later. RESULTS: Patients in the midazolam group rated the examination easier and less uncomfortable compared with those in the other groups. The differences were especially evident in the questionnaires completed 2 weeks after the examination ( p < 0.001). Lidocaine did not significantly improve patient tolerance. However, endoscopists found the procedure easier in patients in the lidocaine group compared with the midazolam ( p < 0.01) and control groups ( p < 0.01) but not the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Routine administration of midazolam for sedation increased patient tolerance for upper endoscopy. However, endoscopists found intubation to be more difficult in sedated vs. non-sedated patients. Topical pharyngeal anesthesia did not enhance patient tolerance, but it did make upper endoscopy technically easier compared with endoscopy in patients sedated with midazolam without topical pharyngeal anesthesia, and in patients who had no sedation or pharyngeal anesthesia, but not in patients who received placebo sedation and placebo pharyngeal anesthesia.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Capsule endoscopy vs. push enteroscopy and enteroclysis in suspected small-bowel Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of small-bowel Crohn's disease sometimes is difficult and may be missed by conventional imaging studies. Capsule endoscopy might identify small-bowel disease undetected by other investigations. METHODS: Patients with or without known Crohn's disease who were suspected to have small-bowel Crohn's disease were prospectively evaluated with push enteroscopy, enteroclysis, and capsule endoscopy. Each examiner was blinded to results of other investigations. Referring doctors were required to complete questionnaires before and after the investigations. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were known to have Crohn's disease (Group 1), and 21 were suspected to have small-bowel Crohn's disease (Group 2). In Group 1, capsule endoscopy detected more erosions than the other two investigations (p < 0.001). In Group 2, a new diagnosis of Crohn's disease was made in two patients, but there was no significant difference in yield compared with the other two investigations. Referring physicians rated the usefulness of capsule endoscopy as 4.4 on a scale of 5. Capsule endoscopy changed management for 30 patients (70%). CONCLUSIONS: Capsule endoscopy has a higher yield than push enteroscopy and enteroclysis in patients with known Crohn's disease when small-bowel mucosal disease is suspected, and this leads to a change in management in the majority of these patients.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Non-small-bowel lesions detected by capsule endoscopy in patients with obscure GI bleeding.

BACKGROUND: Approximately two thirds of patients undergoing capsule endoscopy for obscure GI bleeding will have an abnormality found in the small intestine. This report describes 9 patients (4 men, 5 women) of 140 with obscure bleeding in whom a source of their blood loss was found in the stomach or the colon at capsule endoscopy. METHODS: A review was made of a prospective database of 140 consecutive patients undergoing capsule endoscopy for obscure GI bleeding at a single center. Patients with a definite or likely cause of bleeding within reach of conventional upper or lower GI endoscopy were identified. RESULTS: Three patients had gastric antral vascular ectasia and another an inflamed pyloric canal polyp. Two patients had actively bleeding cecal carcinoma, missed at previous colonoscopies. Two others had bleeding cecal angiodysplasia. The final patient had severe nonspecific cecal inflammation. The identification of these lesions was aided by the suspected blood indicator. All patients underwent endoscopic therapy or surgery for their non-small-bowel lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Like push enteroscopy, capsule endoscopy also can identify lesions within reach of conventional endoscopy and colonoscopy. These subsequently can be treated successfully. The reasons why these lesions have been missed are unclear.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

A prospective study comparing endoscopy and EUS in the evaluation of GI subepithelial masses.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to prospectively evaluate the performance characteristics of endoscopy and EUS in the diagnosis of GI subepithelial masses. METHODS: A total of 100 consecutive patients referred for the evaluation of a suspected GI subepithelial lesion were prospectively studied with endoscopy followed by EUS. Size, color, mobility, location (intramural or extramural), consistency (solid, cystic, or vascular), and presumptive diagnosis were recorded at the time of endoscopy. EUS then was performed, and size, echogenicity, location, and presumptive diagnosis were determined. RESULTS: A total of 100 subepithelial lesions were evaluated. Endoscopy had 98% sensitivity and 64% specificity in identifying intramural lesions. Size measurement by endoscopy correlated with size measurement by EUS (r = 0.88). Histology was obtained in 23 cases, with the presumptive EUS diagnosis correct in only 48% of cases. Most incorrect EUS diagnoses occurred with hypoechoic 3rd and 4th layer masses. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopy has high sensitivity but low specificity in identifying the location (intramural or extramural) of subepithelial lesions. In addition, EUS imaging alone is insufficient to accurately diagnose 3rd and 4th layer hypoechoic masses, and histologic confirmation should be obtained whenever possible.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Age, anemia, and obesity-associated oxygen desaturation during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Although upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is generally a safe procedure, it is known to be associated with arterial oxygen desaturation. We studied 82 patients undergoing diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy following a standard premedication consisting of xylocaine throat spray and intravenous midazolam. The mean duration of endoscopy was 8.5 +/- 0.42 min and the mean dose of midazolam was 6.3 +/- 0.15 mg. The baseline SaO2 was 94.91 +/- 0.27% and it decreased after pre-medication to 92.84 +/- 0.40% (p < 0.001) and after intubation to 91.21 +/- 0.40% (p < 0.001). A fall greater than 4% saturation occurred for 15.68% of the total endoscopy time. SaO2 < 90% was seen for 16.7% and SaO2 < 85% occurred for 2.33% total endoscopy time. In patients > 65 years old, hemoglobin < 10 g/dl, or body mass index > 28, the baseline saturation was significantly lower and a reduced SaO2 was seen throughout the procedure. We identify old age, anemia, and obesity as independent risk factors for arterial oxygen desaturation. We recommend continuous monitoring before sedation, and giving supplemental oxygen to patients with these risk factors from the outset of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Adult↗