Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Biomedical Technology”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 433 records · Page 24Linked to original sources
PubMed1991

Resource allocation in contemporary paediatrics: the case against high technology.

High technology has introduced a new dimension to medical treatment. There are inevitable social costs as well as benefits, and the allocation of resources to high technology, as opposed to other areas of health care, is a contentious issue. The current balance in health service funding between high technology and low technology is not appropriate. It is driven by the technological imperative and only offers solutions to a limited number of problems. There is a scarcity of health resources left to develop intersectoral responses and provide adequate funding for research into person-intensive interventions suitable for many problems. Arguments against allocating too many resources to high technology in paediatrics are examined in this paper.

Australia↗
PubMed2004

Fundamental imaging characteristics of a slot-scan digital chest radiographic system.

Our purpose in this study was to evaluate the fundamental image quality characteristics of a new slot-scan digital chest radiography system (ThoraScan, Delft Imaging Systems/Nucletron, Veenendaal, The Netherlands). The linearity of the system was measured over a wide exposure range at 90, 117, and 140 kVp with added Al filtration. System uniformity and reproducibility were established with an analysis of images from repeated exposures. The modulation transfer function (MTF) was evaluated using an established edge method. The noise power spectrum (NPS) and the detective quantum efficiency (DQE) of the system were evaluated at the three kilo-voltages over a range of exposures. Scatter fraction (SF) measurements were made using a posterior beam stop method and a geometrical chest phantom. The system demonstrated excellent linearity, but some structured nonuniformities. The 0.1 MTF values occurred between 3.3-3.5 mm(-1). The DQE(0.15) and DQE(2.5) were 0.21 and 0.07 at 90 kVp, 0.18 and 0.05 at 117 kVp, and 0.16 and 0.03 at 140 kVp, respectively. The system exhibited remarkably lower SFs compared to conventional full-field systems with anti-scatter grid, measuring 0.13 in the lungs and 0.43 in the mediastinum. The findings indicated that the slot-scan design provides marked scatter reduction leading to high effective DQE (DQEeff) of the system and reduced patient dose required to achieve high image quality.

Equipment Design↗
PubMed2004

New x-ray tube performance in computed tomography by introducing the rotating envelope tube technology.

The future demands of computed tomography imaging regarding the x-ray source can be summarized with higher scan power, shorter rotation times, shorter cool down times and smaller focal spots. We report on a new tube technology satisfying all these demands by making use of a novel cooling principle on one hand and of a novel beam control system on the other hand. Nowadays tubes use a rotating anode disk mainly cooled via radiation. The Straton x-ray tube is the first tube available for clinical routine utilizing convective cooling exclusively. It is demonstrated that this cooling principle makes large heat storage capacities of the anode disk obsolete. The unprecedented cooling rate of 4.8 MHU/min eliminates the need for waiting times due to anode cooling in clinical workflow. Moreover, an electronic beam deflection system for focal spot position and size control opens the door to advanced applications. The physical backgrounds are discussed and the technical realization is presented. From this discussion the superior suitability of this tube to withstand g-forces well above 20 g created by fast rotating gantries will become evident. Experience from a large clinical trial is reported and possible ways for future developments are discussed.

Equipment Design↗
PubMed1994

Colliding forces in radiology: technologic imperative, resource limitations, and accountability demands.

Advances in radiology over the past 20 years are the product of a technologic imperative that has produced new approaches to the acquisition of medical images and modifications to conventional approaches. The imperative has placed radiology at the leading edge of the computer-technology era of modern medicine and has also produced several big-ticket technologies that have been identified as major contributors to rising health care costs. Consequently, the demands for quantitative data on the impact and cost-effectiveness of the use of these technologies in the clinical arena are increasing. Meeting the growing demand for accountability in radiology requires that the discipline adopt innovative approaches for assessing its technologies and acquire new types of data, including documentation of cost savings accrued by selective use of radiologic technologies and demonstration of the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of triage schemes that lead to more effective decision making. The requirement of quantitative accountability represents a new way of doing business for radiology and a new approach to management for those responsible for business.

Cost-Benefit Analysis↗
PubMed2004

Technology assessment for radiologists.

Health technology assessment is the systematic and quantitative evaluation of the safety, efficacy, and cost of health care interventions. This article outlines aspects of technology assessment of diagnostic imaging. First, it presents a conceptual framework of a hierarchy of levels of efficacy that should guide thinking about imaging test evaluation. In particular, the framework shows how the question answered by most evaluations of imaging tests, "How well does this test distinguish disease from the nondiseased state?" relates to the fundamental questions for all health technology assessment, "How much does this intervention improve the health of people?" and "What is the cost of that improvement?" Second, it describes decision analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis, which are quantitative modeling techniques usually used to answer the two core questions for imaging. Third, it outlines design and operational considerations that are vital if researchers who are conducting an experimental study are to make a quality contribution to technology assessment, either directly through their findings or as an input into decision analyses. Finally, it includes a separate discussion of screening--that is, the application of diagnostic tests to nonsymptomatic populations--because the requirements for good screening tests are different from those for diagnostic tests of symptomatic patients and because the appropriate evaluation methods also differ.

Cost-Benefit Analysis↗
PubMed2005

Cost-effectiveness analysis in the assessment of diagnostic imaging technologies.

In many ways, diagnostic technologies differ from therapeutic medical technologies. Perhaps most important, diagnostic technologies do not generally directly affect long-term patient outcomes. Instead, the results of diagnostic tests can influence the care of patients; in that way, diagnostic tests may affect long-term outcomes. Because of this, the benefits associated with the use of a specific diagnostic technology will depend on the performance characteristics (eg, sensitivity and specificity) of the test, as well as other factors, such as prevalence of disease and effectiveness of available treatments for the disease in question. The fact that diagnostic tests affect short-term, or "surrogate," outcomes, rather than long-term patient outcomes makes evaluation of these tests more complicated than the evaluation of therapeutic technologies. This article will trace the history of technology assessment in medicine, address the role of cost-effectiveness and decision analysis in health technology assessment, and describe unique features and approaches to assessing diagnostic technologies. The article will then conclude with a consideration of the limits of medical technology assessment.

Cost-Benefit Analysis↗
PubMed1997

Rapid method for rigorous assessment of radiologic imaging technologies.

Rapid and rigorous technology evaluation is important for improving quality and cost in health care, particularly for swiftly changing, highly technologic fields like radiology. Currently, however, evaluations are generally seriously deficient in quality, and rigorous evaluations typically require 4 years or more. Therefore, the authors developed an appropriate methodology. Its principal characteristics include study of outcomes, clinical relevance, multi-institutional design, intensive communication, experienced data management and statistical centers, sophisticated analysis, careful attention to the protocol and reference standard, on-site managers, and extensive pretesting and refinement. The authors successfully tested the methodology in a seven-institution study. Completed in 1 1/4 years, the study achieved active participation of treating physicians, which much enhanced the clinical relevance of the end points studied. The data supported extensive analyses, which included the effect of imaging on treatment plans, an important outcome measure. The authors report the (limited) difficulties encountered and identify changes to ameliorate them. Thus revised, the methodology can serve as a model for future technology assessments.

Technology Assessment, Biomedical↗
PubMed2002

Patient preferences and the measurement of utilities in the evaluation of dental technologies.

Advances in life sciences that are predicted in the 21st century will present many challenges for health professionals and policy-makers. The major questions will be how to allocate resources to pay for costs of new technologies and who will best benefit from advances in new diagnostic and treatment methods. We review in this paper the concept of utility and how it can be applied and expanded to provide data to help health professionals make decisions that are preferred by patients and the public at large. Utility is a measure of people's well-being or preferences for outcomes. The measurement of utilities of a new diagnostic technology, for example, can be carried out with the use of simple methods that do not incorporate all of the uncertainties and potential outcomes associated with providing the test, or with more complex methods that can incorporate most uncertainties. This review describes and critiques the different measurement methods of utilities.

Attitude to Health↗
PubMed1994

The dynamics of technological change in medicine.

This paper contrasts a dynamic and interactive view of technological change with the linear model of medical innovation that is still so deeply ingrained in many policy discussions. In particular, it focuses on the role of feedback mechanisms between the users and the developers of medical technology and the demand and supply forces (including competition among medical specialties) determining this feedback. It explores three distinct mechanisms by which technological change may contribute to rising health care spending: intensity of use of existing technology, introduction of new technologies, and expanded application of these new technologies.

Diffusion of Innovation↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Physicians' views of the relative importance of thirty medical innovations.

In response to a mail survey, 225 leading general internists provided their opinions of the relative importance to patients of thirty medical innovations. They also provided information about themselves and their practices. Their responses yielded a mean score and a variability score for each innovation. Mean scores were significantly higher for innovations in procedures than in medications and for innovations to treat cardiovascular disease than for those to treat other diseases. The rankings were similar across subgroups of respondents, but the evaluations of a few innovations were significantly related to physicians' age. The greatest variability in response was usually related to the physician's patient mix.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗