[Feed-back and biofeed-back in practice].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biofeedback, Psychology↗
SEARCH · Search PubMed
Results for “Back”
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
[Back diffusion of hydrogen ion in peptic ulcers. V. Hydrogen ion back diffusion in various gastric disorders and its participation in ulcer formation (author's transl)].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Adult↗
Back to the grind and back on your feet.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Employment↗
Back pain in primary care: predictors of high health-care costs.
The objective of this study was to describe the health care utilization and prospective predictors of high-cost primary-care back pain patients. In the primary-care clinics of a large, staff model health maintenance organization in western Washington State, 1059 subjects were selected from consecutive patients presenting for back pain. The design was a 1-year prospective cohort study. Patients' were interviewed 1 month after an index primary-care back pain visit. Costs (back pain and total) and utilization (back pain primary-care follow-up visits, back pain specialty visits, back pain hospitalizations, back pain radiologic procedures, and pain medicine fills) were tracked over the next 11 months. Predictors assessed at 1 month were back pain diagnosis (disc disorder/sciatica, arthritis, vs. other), chronic pain grade (measure of pain intensity and related dysfunction), pain persistence (days with pain in prior 6 months), depressive symptomatology, and back pain-related disability compensation (ever/never). For the sample, 21% of patients with back pain costs > or = $600 (high back pain costs) accounted for 66% of back pain costs, 42% of total costs, 55% of primary-care follow-up visits for back pain, 91% of back pain specialty visits, 100% of back pain hospitalizations, 51% of back pain radiologic procedures, and 52% of pain medicine fills. The 21% with total costs > or = $2700 (high total costs) accounted for 67.7% of total costs, 52% of back pain costs, 29% of primary-care follow-up visits for back pain, 66% of back pain specialty visits, 100% of back pain hospitalizations, 39% of back pain radiologic procedures, and 42% of pain medicine fills. Multivariable logistic regression analyses indicated that increasing chronic pain grade, more persistent pain, and disc disorder/sciatica were strong independent predictors of high total and high back pain costs. Increasing depressive symptoms significantly predicted high total but not high back pain costs. Back pain disability compensation predicted high back pain but not high total costs. A minority of primary-care back pain patients accounted for a majority of health-care costs. Patients with high back pain costs accounted for more back pain-related health-care utilization than did patients with high total costs. Factors predicting subsequent high costs suggest behavioral interventions targeting dysfunction, pain persistence, and depression may reduce health-care utilization and prevent accumulation of high health-care costs among primary-care back pain patients.
Adolescent↗
An epidemiological study of diagnostic and therapeutic strategies in office practice patients with subacute or chronic pain in the thoracic or low back. Comparison of practices in primary care and rheumatology settings.
UNLABELLED: There is a paucity of epidemiological data on diagnostic and therapeutic practices in office practice patients with subacute or chronic pain in the thoracic or low back. STUDY OBJECTIVE: to describe diagnostic and therapeutic strategies used in such patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: descriptive, prospective, two-month epidemiological study in 50 general practitioners and 50 rheumatologists. Each physician was asked to provide data on the demographics, clinical features, history of spinal disease, investigations, prior treatments and treatments prescribed on D0 and D30 in two patients with low back pain and two with thoracic back pain, of one to 12 months' duration. RESULTS: A total of 352 patients were included. In the 217 patients with low back pain, including 107 women and 110 men, duration of the pain was 4.3 +/- 0.2 months and mean age was 49.6 +/- 1 years; 67% of these patients were economically active and 22% were retired; 59% were recruited by rheumatologists. In the thoracic back pain group, there were 135 patients, including 82 women (61%) and 53 men, with a mean duration of pain of 3.8 +/- 0.3 months and a mean age of 47.7 +/- 1.4 years; 60% were economically active and 22% were retired; 49% were recruited by rheumatologists. A history of conservatively-treated low or thoracic back pain was reported for 95.4% of patients in the low back pain group and 94% in the thoracic back pain group. Of the patients with low back pain, 6.3% had had spinal surgery. Investigations were as follows: roentgenograms in 85% of low back pain and 75% of thoracic back pain patients, computed tomography in 11% and 5.8%, magnetic resonance imaging in 2% and 1% and laboratory tests in 14% and 20%. Ninety-one per cent of low back pain and 84% of thoracic back pain patients were already under therapy on D0. Ninety-six per cent of patients overall were given a prescription at the end of the D0 visit, for a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug or an analgesic in 80% of low back pain and 63% of thoracic back pain patients, for muscle relaxants in 62% and 69%, for drugs aimed at preventing gastric side effects in 19% and 9.5%, for myotonic agents in 10% and 8% and for sedatives in 5% and 11%. A local steroid injection was given to 20% of low back pain patients. Twenty-four per cent of low back pain and 14% of thoracic back pain patients missed days of work (mean, 11 +/- 1.7 days and 13 +/- 4.6 days, respectively). Physical therapy was prescribed to 36% of low back pain and 27% of thoracic back pain patients and a lumbar support belt to 17% of low back pain patients. On D30, the pain had abated in 86% of low back pain and 89% of thoracic back pain patients and complete freedom from pain was reported by 28% and 32% of patients in these two groups, respectively. Treatments prescribed on D30 were physical therapy (43% and 31%), analgesics (40% and 36%) muscle relaxants (25% and 30%), and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (23% and 12%). Conclusion. This preliminary study provides data on common practices in subacute and chronic low back and back pain and may prove useful for health care cost estimations.
Acute Disease↗
Psychological and functional profiles in select subjects with low back pain.
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Some researchers have found a correlation of poor treatment outcomes in patients with low back pain and abnormal psychological profiles, whereas others have failed to confirm this correlation. A critical feature of this debate has been whether abnormal psychological profiles seen in patients with back pain are the result of the ongoing back pain or whether pre-existing psychological features predispose to a poor clinical outcome. PURPOSE: To determine the relationship of psychometric testing scores to the presence and duration of back pain of differing causes. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: This was a prospective observational study of the psychological profiles of groups of patients with low back pain and controls. PATIENT SAMPLE: Subjects having a variety of painful back conditions (n=310) were compared with a control group of subjects without low back complaints who had undergone cervical spine surgery (n=73). OUTCOMES MEASURES: Psychometric testing (Modified Zung and Modified Somatic Pain Questionnaire) was performed along with pain scores (visual analog scale [VAS]), a standardized Low Back Pain Questionnaire, and the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire in the evaluation of back pain and control subjects. METHODS: The subjects with painful back conditions included patients with presumed discogenic pain undergoing discography (n=95); patients with symptomatic isthmic spondylolisthesis coming to fusion (n=61); patients with chronic vertebral osteomyelitis before diagnosis and treatment (n=39). There was also a nonpatient group of soldiers with chronic low back pain not seeking medical care (n=115). The control subjects without low back pain consisted of a group who had undergone cervical spine surgery (n=73). Psychometric testing was performed and compared in the evaluation of subjects having these different painful back conditions. Analysis was done comparing pain scores, function scores, and psychological testing scores between the symptomatic and asymptomatic groups. RESULTS: The VAS maximum in last week score for the entire group was 7.1, and scores were not significantly different in all low back pain groups. The Oswestry scores were poorest in the discography group compared to spondylolisthesis and osteomyelitis. Functional scores were similar in the soldiers with low back pain and controls without low back pain. Both Depression and Somatic Pain scores were most abnormal in the discogenic low back pain group. Only 21% of this group had normal scores, compared with 71% of the spondylolisthesis group, 79% of osteomyelitis group, and 88% of the group with chronic low back pain not seeking treatment (p<.001 in all groups). The asymptomatic control group had 85% normal scores. CONCLUSIONS: Despite similar pain levels and pain duration, patients with the discographic diagnosis of discogenic back pain have poorer functional scores and very abnormal psychological scores compared with other subjects with chronic low back pain resulting from spondylolisthesis requiring surgery or chronic pyogenic osteomyelitis. Chronic moderately severe mechanical low back pain in healthy subjects was not associated with abnormal psychological scores or functional disability.
Adaptation, Physiological↗
Follow-up of patients with low back pain during pregnancy.
OBJECTIVE: To identify the long-term risk for low back pain among women with previous severe low back pain during pregnancy. METHODS: In a previous prospective study, 79 pregnant women developed low back pain severe enough to require sick leave. Twelve years later a questionnaire was sent to 62 of these women and 84 controls who did not develop severe low back pain during pregnancy. The questionnaire asked about occupation, low back pain in general and during later pregnancies, and sick leave due to low back pain. There were also questions regarding use of oral contraceptives and its possible relation to low back pain. RESULTS: The response rate was 84% in the back pain group and 80% among controls. The two groups were similar according to the percentage of women having had another pregnancy (33 of 52 [63%] versus 39 of 67 [58%]) but ten (19%) of the women with previous low back pain stated they had refrained from another pregnancy because of their fear of low back pain compared with only one control. Almost all women (31 of 33) with previous severe low back pain experienced the same symptoms in a subsequent pregnancy, compared with 17 of 39 (44%) controls. Even when they were not pregnant, women with previous low back pain suffered more often and used more sick leave due to low back pain (44 of 52 versus 43 of 67, chi2 = 5.68, P < .05). The location (sacroiliac joint or lumbar affection) of the previous low back pain did not affect the long-term prognosis. In a logistic regression model, previous low back pain during pregnancy was the only independent risk factor for low back pain during a subsequent pregnancy, whereas an occupation involving physical demand did not affect the results. However, together with previous low back pain during pregnancy, heavy occupation increased the risk for current nonpregnant low back pain. CONCLUSION: Women with severe low back pain during pregnancy have an extremely high risk for experiencing a new episode of severe low back pain during another pregnancy and when not pregnant.
Adult↗
Psychological questionnaires: do "abnormal" scores precede or follow first-time low back pain?
STUDY DESIGN: A prospective study of psychological risk factors for first-time low back pain with repeated use of psychological questionnaires. OBJECTIVES: To measure the reproducibility of scores from psychological questionnaires, and to compare this with changes that follow an individual's first attack of back pain. Secondly, to determine which scores predict first-time back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: "Abnormal" psychometric scores are associated with several aspects of back pain behavior. Little is known, however, about their reproducibility or long-term stability, and there has been no definitive answer to the question: which comes first, "abnormal" scores or low back pain? METHODS: 403 volunteers with no history of "serious" low back pain (defined as pain requiring medical attention or absence from work) participated in a functional spinal assessment. At the time of initial assessment and at 6-month intervals thereafter, the volunteers completed the following questionnaires: the Health Locus of Control, which was subdivided into three sections labelled "Internal," "Powerful others," and "Chance"; the Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire; and the Zung depression scale. Scores from the Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire and from the Zung depression scale were added to form a measure of psychological distress. Additional questionnaires inquired about any back pain experienced in the previous 6 months. Only three volunteers had left the study at the 18-month follow-up. At that time 162 participants had reported "any" low back pain, of which 79 were "serious." RESULTS: Intraclass correlation coefficients for scores repeated after 6 months ranged from 0.67-0.80, and reproducibility of scores was equally high between the 0-, 6-, 12- and 18-month assessments. None of the scores were affected by "any" low back pain, and only the Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire scores changed after "serious" back pain was reported. In a multivariate analysis, the most significant predictor of first time "serious" or "any" back pain was a history of non-"serious" back pain (P < 0.001). Of the psychological factors, the sum of Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire scores and Zung questionnaire scores was the best predictor of "serious" back pain (P = 0.037), and the Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire score was the best predictor of "any" back pain (P = 0.002). The 25% of participants with the highest sum of scores from the Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire and Zung questionnaire was 2.7 times more likely to develop "serious" back pain than the 25% with the lowest sum of these scores. Nevertheless, after accounting for the affects of a history of non-"serious" back pain, psychometric scores predicted less than an additional 3% of reported back pain. CONCLUSIONS: The scores from the Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire and Zung questionnaire were reproducible over 18 months and were affected little by first episodes of back pain; yet these scores were significant predictors of it. "Abnormal" scores from these questionnaires precede back pain in a small number of people.
Adolescent↗
Low back disability among self-employed dentists, veterinarians, physicians and physical therapists in The Netherlands. A retrospective study over a 13-year period (N = 1,119) and an early intervention program with 1-year follow-up (N = 134).
This study was carried out among self-employed dentists, veterinarians, physicians and physical therapists insured against the financial consequences of disability by the insurance company Movir in Nieuwegein, the Netherlands. Disability for an individual was defined as a condition in which someone, due to illness or accident, regardless of the cause, is unable to pursue his/her profession, according to medical assessment. It concerned both short-term and long-term periods of sickness absence. The study consists of two parts: a) A retrospective investigation into the magnitude of the problem of low back disability from 1977 through 1989. b) A test of an early intervention program, introduced in 1990, involving a control group of low back disability claimants of 1987 and 1988 combined. Low back pain was the main cause of disability in 1,119 claims, submitted by 839 claimants. In 795 cases, this involved the first low back disability claim during the whole insurance period. The incidence of low back disability increased by 211 percent, from 3.48 per 1,000 persons at risk in 1977 to 7.35 in 1989. The costs of compensation for low back disability increased from 5.7 percent of the total compensation paid in 1977 to 13 percent in 1989. Nearly a quarter of the claims, all of which lasted longer than six months, accounted for 90 percent of the compensation costs of low back disability. The present study showed that in the case of veterinarians over 34 years of age and dentists over 44 years of age, specific low back pain, nonspecific low back pain in combination with a deferred period of 14 days or more, low back problems before acceptance, and the presence of psychosocial problems at the start of the disability were significantly associated with the duration of low back disability. This means that these "factors" predicted a longer duration. Based on the retrospective data, a predictive model of long-term low back disability was developed, which could be used for secondary prevention among the population studied. At termination of a first claim of low back disability, a deferred period of 30 days or more, and low back surgery at the first claim or before acceptance predicted a longer working period until a recurrence, while low back problems before acceptance had an inverse effect. The retrospective study demonstrated the effect of insurance factors on the incidence and the duration of low back disability, and on the recurrence rate. The higher the insured daily compensation, the higher the risk of claiming low back disability. A deferred period of 14 days or more decreased the risk of claiming low back disability.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
Adult↗
Superficial heat or cold for low back pain.
BACKGROUND: Heat and cold are commonly utilised in the treatment of low-back pain by both health care professionals and people with low-back pain. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of superficial heat and cold therapy for low-back pain in adults. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Back Review Group Specialised register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2005), MEDLINE (1966 to October 2005), EMBASE (1980 to October 2005) and other relevant databases. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials and non-randomised controlled trials that examined superficial heat or cold therapies in people with low-back pain. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently assessed methodological quality and extracted data, using the criteria recommended by the Cochrane Back Review Group. MAIN RESULTS: Nine trials involving 1117 participants were included. In two trials of 258 participants with a mix of acute and sub-acute low-back pain, heat wrap therapy significantly reduced pain after five days (weighted mean difference (WMD) 1.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68 to 1.45, scale range 0 to 5) compared to oral placebo. One trial of 90 participants with acute low-back pain found that a heated blanket significantly decreased acute low-back pain immediately after application (WMD -32.20, 95%CI -38.69 to -25.71, scale range 0 to 100). One trial of 100 participants with a mix of acute and sub-acute low-back pain examined the additional effects of adding exercise to heat wrap, and found that it reduced pain after seven days. There is insufficient evidence to evaluate the effects of cold for low-back pain, and conflicting evidence for any differences between heat and cold for low-back pain. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The evidence base to support the common practice of superficial heat and cold for low back pain is limited and there is a need for future higher-quality randomised controlled trials. There is moderate evidence in a small number of trials that heat wrap therapy provides a small short-term reduction in pain and disability in a population with a mix of acute and sub-acute low-back pain, and that the addition of exercise further reduces pain and improves function. The evidence for the application of cold treatment to low-back pain is even more limited, with only three poor quality studies located. No conclusions can be drawn about the use of cold for low-back pain. There is conflicting evidence to determine the differences between heat and cold for low-back pain.
Adult↗
Labour pain: correlations with menstrual pain and acute low-back pain before and during pregnancy.
Low-back pain is a major component of labour pain in a substantial number of women. The purpose of this study was to determine whether episodes of acute low-back pain prior to pregnancy is a predictor of low-back pain during labour. 114 women received the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) during labour and were asked to describe the pain separately for front and back contraction pain or continuous pain. The day after the birth of the child the women were interviewed to determine whether they had (a) a history of episodes of acute low-back pain before pregnancy, (b) low-back pain during pregnancy, and (c) low-back pain during menstruation. The results show that episodic low-back pain before pregnancy is not correlated with any aspect of labour pain. However, it is significantly correlated with episodes of low-back pain during pregnancy. In contrast, low-back pain during menstruation is significantly correlated with labour pain scores recorded for back and front contraction pain as well as for continuous back pain. The significant correlation of labour pain with back pain during menstruation suggests that both share a common underlying mechanism. Similarly, the correlation of low-back pain during pregnancy with episodes of acute low-back pain before pregnancy suggests that the strain on back muscles during pregnancy may activate the mechanisms that underlie the usual forms of low-back pain.
Abdomen↗
Low back pain among nurses: a follow-up beginning at entry to the nursing school.
STUDY DESIGN: A prospective cohort. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the prevalence of back pain from entering the nursing school through 5 years in nursing and the determinants and modifiers of back pain and disability. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Physical loading, psychologic characteristics, and several other factors have been associated with back pain at work in earlier studies. Because of the lack of the prework entry morbidity data, the nature of the associations between these exposures and the symptoms is unclear. That previous back pain is a predictor of later pain underlines the importance to have pre-employment data in investigations of the role of exposures at work. METHODS: Female nursing students (n = 174) were followed for 7.5 years. Data on constitutional and behavioral factors, occupational exposures, and back-related symptoms and disability were collected. Back pain was grouped into "sciatic," "sudden," or "other" and related disability. RESULTS: The lifetime cumulative prevalence of back pain increased from 31% at entry to nursing school to 72% at the end of the school and further to 82% after 5 years as a nurse. The 1-year prevalence of any back pain was 54% for the first year in nursing school, 57% for the first year as a nurse, and 64% for the fifth year as a nurse. In multivariate analyses, other back pain and related disability as a nurse were associated with back pain history at the entry to nursing school (odds ratio, 7.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-34; and 3.6; 1.2-11, respectively), and working in twisted/bent positions (odds ratio, 6.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.7-23; and 7.5; 2.9-20, respectively). Sudden back pain was not associated with any of the studied risk factors. Sciatic back pain was associated only with working positions (odds ratio, 6.9; 95% confidence interval, 2.1-23). CONCLUSIONS: Lifetime prevalence of back pain increased sharply during nursing school but slowly after that. Back pain at entering the nursing school was a predictor for back-related pain and disability. Self- reported occupational physical work load was associated with back pain and related disability. The nature of the association is unclear, but it is likely that back pain is exacerbated during nursing.
Adult↗
Exercise as a treatment for chronic low back pain.
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Exercise is a widely prescribed treatment for chronic low back pain, with demonstrated effectiveness for improving function and work. PURPOSE: The goal of this article is to review several key aspects about the safety and efficacy of exercise that may help clinicians understand its utility in treating chronic back pain. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: A computerized literature search of MEDLINE was conducted using "exercise," "fitness," "back pain," "backache" and "rehabilitation" as search words. Identified abstracts were scanned, and useful articles were acquired for further review. Additional references were acquired through the personal collections of research papers possessed by the authors and by reviewing prior review articles on this subject. These final papers were scrutinized for data relevant to the key aspects about exercise covered in this article. RESULTS: For people with acute, subacute or chronic low back pain, there is no evidence that exercise increases the risk of additional back problems or work disability. To the contrary, current medical literature suggests that exercise has either a neutral effect or may slightly reduce risk of future back injuries. Exercise can be prescribed for patients with chronic low back pain with three distinct goals. The first and most obvious goal is to improve or eliminate impairments in back flexibility and strength, and improve performance of endurance activities. There is a large body of evidence confirming that this goal can be accomplished for a majority of patients with chronic low back pain. The second goal of exercise is to reduce the intensity of back pain. Most studies of exercise have noted overall reduction in back pain intensity that ranges from 10% to 50% after exercise treatment. The third goal of exercise is to reduce back pain-related disability through a process of desensitization of fears and concerns, altering pain attitudes and beliefs and improving affect. The mechanisms through which exercise can accomplish this goal have been the subject of substantial research. CONCLUSIONS: Exercise is safe for individuals with back pain, because it does not increase the risk of future back injuries or work absence. Substantial evidence exists supporting the use of exercise as a therapeutic tool to improve impairments in back flexibility and strength. Most studies have observed improvements in global pain ratings after exercise programs, and many have observed that exercise can lessen the behavioral, cognitive, affect and disability aspects of back pain syndromes.
Exercise Therapy↗
Back injuries in industry: a retrospective study. I. Overview and cost analysis.
To evaluate the impact off back injury on industry, the authors conducted a retrospective analysis of injuries among hourly employees of a large industrial manufacturer in western Washington. The Boeing Company provided injury information on 31,200 employees for a 15-month period from July 1, 1979 to September 30, 1980. Of the 4,645 injuries reported, 900 were back injuries. Claims related to back injuries constituted 19% of all workers' compensation claims but were responsible for 41% of the total injury costs, or approximately $1,800,000. The 90 most expensive back injury claims (10% of all back injury claims) were responsible for 79% of the total back injury costs. The percentage of back injury claimants with claims having a total incurred cost exceeding $10,000 (6.5%) was significantly higher than the corresponding percentage of claimants (1.5%) with claims for other than back injuries (P = 0.000). A similar significant difference was found concerning the tendency of back injury claimants to have multiple claims compared with the non-back injury claimants. This retrospective study reaffirms the significant economic impact of back injuries on industry, and specifically high-cost back injuries. In addition, it provides insight into factors associated with back injury and points to positive measures that may be taken to reduce back pain and economic loss. Characteristics of the back injury and employee-related factors associated with back injury are presented in two subsequent articles.
Back Injuries↗
Back problems among postmenopausal women taking estrogen replacement therapy: the study of osteoporotic fractures.
STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional and prospective. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the association between estrogen replacement therapy use, back pain, and back function in a large cohort of elderly women. BACKGROUND: Several studies have suggested that women who use estrogen replacement therapy may be more likely to experience back pain than those who do not. However, the relationships between estrogen replacement therapy, back pain, and impaired back function have not been clearly delineated. METHODS: At baseline information on estrogen replacement therapy use, functional status, back pain and function, and general lifestyle variables was obtained from 7209 elderly white women (mean age 71 years)enrolled in the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures. Lateral radiographs of the lumbar and thoracic spine were taken at baseline and at the third clinic visit, an average of 3.7 years after the baseline visit. Bone mineral density at the hip and spine was measured approximately 2 years after baseline. Follow-up information on back pain and function was also obtained at the third clinic visit. RESULTS: A total of 1039 (14.4%) women were using estrogen replacement therapy at baseline, 2016(28.0%) reported former use, and 4154 (57.6%) had never used estrogen replacement therapy. Compared with never-users, a statistically significant higher percentage of current estrogen users reported clinical back pain (52.7% vs. 43.4%) and back impairment (12.3% vs. 9.2%) at baseline and at the follow-up visit (pain 50.8% vs. 41%; impairment 16.0% vs. 12.1%). This occurred despite a higher prevalence of vertebral fractures in never-users of estrogen at the baseline visit. Current and former estrogen users without vertebral fractures had statistically significant higher likelihoods of having back pain and back dysfunction at both the baseline and third follow-up visit. The increased likelihood of back pain and back impairment in current and former estrogen users remained despite statistical adjustment for age, vertebral fracture, body mass index,smoking history, parity, exercise, arthritis, and diabetes in multivariate models. The relative risk (95%confidence interval) for impaired back function in former and current users at follow-up was 1.1 (0.9, 1.3) and 1.6 (1.3, 2.0), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that postmenopausal estrogen use is associated with an increased likelihood of back pain and impaired back function in elderly white women.
Aged↗
Characteristics of patients with chronic low back pain selected for surgery: a comparison with the general population reported from the Swedish lumbar spine study.
STUDY DESIGN: A group of surgical candidates with chronic low back pain was compared with a random sample of the general population. OBJECTIVES: To compare the sociodemographic, physical, and psychological characteristics of patients enrolled in a randomized trial of fusion surgery for chronic low back pain with those of an age- and gender-matched general population, and to assess whether the results of the current study can be generalized to other groups of subjects with chronic low back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The patients with low back pain in industry, primary care, and rehabilitation clinics are well described, with evidence of increased psychological distress, social disturbance, and occupational dissatisfaction. The characteristics of surgical candidates with chronic low back pain are less well described and not compared with the general population. METHODS: Social, occupational, psychological, and physical data from self-administered questionnaires completed by 294 consecutive surgical candidates with chronic low back pain were compared with the same data from 278 subjects in an age- and gender-matched random sample of the Swedish general population. Data were analyzed with the general population sample divided in two subgroups: subjects with and those without back pain. RESULTS: The surgical candidates with chronic low back pain differed significantly from the control subjects free of back pain by demonstrating more smoking, general morbidity, and depressive symptoms as well as heavier occupation and self-assessed workload. However, they did not differ from the control subjects with back pain in these respects. In a multiple logistic regression analysis, physical disability was the only variable that independently discriminated between all three groups. The groups did not differ in terms of depressive symptoms. Differences were more obvious between the two general population groups than between the two groups with back pain. The rate of major depression was lower (9%) among the surgical candidates than in other reported groups with chronic low back pain. CONCLUSIONS: The surgical candidates in the current study resembled the average Swedish citizen with back pain. Although selected for treatment because of symptom severity, they did not otherwise differ substantially from the general population with back pain. On the contrary they unexpectedly were affected only a little by depressive symptoms, distinguishing them from patients with chronic low back pain in pain clinics and rehabilitation centers. Therefore, the results of the this outcome study are not generally applicable to every patient with chronic low back pain.
Adult↗
The classification of anatomic- and symptom-based low back disorders using motion measure models.
STUDY DESIGN: This study observed the trunk angular motion features of healthy subjects and those experiencing chronic low back disorders as they flexed and extended their trunks in five symmetric and asymmetric planes of motion. Trunk angular position, velocity, and acceleration were evaluated during several cycles of motion. OBJECTIVE: The trunk angular motion features of the low back disorder group were normalized relative to the healthy subjects and used to 1) evaluate the repeatability and reliability of trunk motion as a measure of trunk musculoskeletal status, 2) quantify the extent of the disorder, 3) determine the extent to which trunk motion measures might be used as quantifiable means to help classify low back disorders. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Given the magnitude of the low back disorder problem, it is problematic that there are few quantitative methods for objectively documenting the extent of a disorder. Impairment ratings of low back disorders can vary by as much as 70% using current systems. Diagnoses and classification schemes are rarely based upon quantitative indicators and we are unable to easily assess and diagnose low back disorders. It is important to quantitatively evaluate low back disorders so that proper treatment can be administered and the risk of exacerbating the problem can be minimized. METHODS: Three-hundred-thirty-nine men and women between 20 and 70 years old who had not experienced significant back pain were recruited as the healthy subjects in this study. One hundred-seventy-one patients with various chronic low back disorders also were recruited and compared with the healthy group of subjects. All subjects wore a triaxial goniometer on their trunks that documented the angular position, velocity, and acceleration of the trunk as the subjects flexed and extended their trunks in each of five planes of motion. Trunk motion features first were normalized for subject gender and age. Several two-stage eight-variable models that account for trunk motion interactions were developed to classify the 510 healthy and low back injured subjects into one of 10 anatomic and symptom-based low back disorder classification categories. RESULTS: Using conservative cross-validation measures, it was found that the stage one eight-variable model could correctly classify more than 94% of the subjects as either healthy or having a low back disorder. One of the stage two eight-variable models was able to reasonably classify the patients with low back disorders into one of 10 low back disorder classification groups. CONCLUSION: The motion-related parameters may relate to biomechanical or learned sensitivities to spinal loading. This study suggests that higher-order trunk motion characteristics hold great promise as a quantitative indicator of the trunk's musculoskeletal status and may be used as a measure of the extent of a disorder and as a measure of rehabilitative progress. Furthermore, once the interactive nature of these trunk motion characteristics is considered, the model could help diagnose low back disorders. However, independent data sets are needed to validate these findings.
Adult↗
A prospective follow-up study of low back pain in the community.
STUDY DESIGN: Opportunistic prospective follow-up study. OBJECTIVE: To describe the natural history of low back pain in the community and to model the factors predictive of recovered versus persistent low back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: A two-phase questionnaire was mailed to adults in the Bradford Metropolitan Health District in 1994. Valid respondents were surveyed again in 1997. Analysis is based on the combined results of these two surveys. METHODS: Unifactorial and multifactorial statistics were analyzed based on 1455 adults, with and without low back pain. RESULTS: One third of respondents reported no lifetime low back pain. Average lifetime prevalence was 59% and average annual prevalence 41%. Of those who reported lifetime low back pain, 42% reported persistent annual low back pain, 18% reported a first episode in 1997, resulting in a 4% population incidence rate, and 40% reported intermittent low back pain. The likelihood of having had low back pain increased significantly with age. Those who reported a new case of low back pain in 1997 were significantly more likely to be 25-34 years of age, and these persons were most likely to report acute low back pain with very little disability. Those with persistent low back pain were significantly more likely to report chronic low back pain with some disability. Logistic regression modeling was unable to predict recovered versus persistent low back pain, given the person, pain, and treatment factors available. CONCLUSIONS: Results showed that low back pain is a mutable problem with acute episodes blending into longer periods resulting in more disability as time progresses. A wide range of demographic, pain, consultation, and treatment factors were not predictive of low back pain recovery.
Adult↗