Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “ANESTHESIA, CONDUCTION”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 433 records · Page 24Linked to original sources
PubMed1996

[Is propofol (Diprivan) indicated in emergency surgery?].

Propofol is an anesthetic characterized by specific pharmacologic qualities, conditioning compliance of the clinical picture with the drug infusional rate, high-degree safety and facilitated anesthesia conduction--qualities by which it bears resemblance to inhalation anesthesia. This is an assessment of the qualities of TIVA with Propofol in poor-risk patients according to ASA, operated on an emergency basis. Proceeding from the obtained results, the inference is reached that continuous Propofol infusion provides for adequate anesthesia control and safety of the patients with heightened anesthesiologic and operative risk.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1994

Augmentation of calf blood flow by epinephrine infusion during lumbar epidural anesthesia.

Lower rates of deep vein thrombosis after hip surgery performed under epidural anesthesia were noted in patients who received intravenous epinephrine infusion. To determine whether this effect could be mediated by enhanced lower extremity blood flow, 12 patients were studied immediately preoperatively. Calf blood flow increased from 3.7 +/- 1.6 to 5.0 +/- 2.2 mL.100 mL-1.min-1 with an intravenous epinephrine infusion (1.9 +/- 0.5 microgram/min). After epidural anesthesia calf blood flow increased to 6.3 +/- 3.3 mL.100 mL-1.min-1 with epinephrine infusion (2.7 +/- 1.0 micrograms/min) but was reduced to 2.6 +/- 1.5 mL.100 mL-1.min-1 when norepinephrine (0.8 +/- 0.7 microgram/min) was infused. Calf vascular resistance decreased from 27.7 +/- 13.5 to 7.9 +/- 4.6 mmHg.mL-1.100 mL-1.min-1 after epidural anesthesia with epinephrine (2.7 +/- 1.0 micrograms/min) but was unchanged when norepinephrine (0.8 +/- 0.7 microgram/min) was infused. The augmentation of lower extremity blood flow when epinephrine is used in conjunction with epidural anesthesia may in part explain the low frequency of deep vein thrombosis with conduction anesthesia.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Perioperative heat balance.

Hypothermia during general anesthesia develops with a characteristic three-phase pattern. The initial rapid reduction in core temperature after induction of anesthesia results from an internal redistribution of body heat. Redistribution results because anesthetics inhibit the tonic vasoconstriction that normally maintains a large core-to-peripheral temperature gradient. Core temperature then decreases linearly at a rate determined by the difference between heat loss and production. However, when surgical patients become sufficiently hypothermic, they again trigger thermoregulatory vasoconstriction, which restricts core-to-peripheral flow of heat. Constraint of metabolic heat, in turn, maintains a core temperature plateau (despite continued systemic heat loss) and eventually reestablishes the normal core-to-peripheral temperature gradient. Together, these mechanisms indicate that alterations in the distribution of body heat contribute more to changes in core temperature than to systemic heat imbalance in most patients. Just as with general anesthesia, redistribution of body heat is the major initial cause of hypothermia in patients administered spinal or epidural anesthesia. However, redistribution during neuraxial anesthesia is typically restricted to the legs. Consequently, redistribution decreases core temperature about half as much during major conduction anesthesia. As during general anesthesia, core temperature subsequently decreases linearly at a rate determined by the inequality between heat loss and production. The major difference, however, is that the linear hypothermia phase is not discontinued by reemergence of thermoregulatory vasoconstriction because constriction in the legs is blocked peripherally. As a result, in patients undergoing large operations with neuraxial anesthesia, there is the potential of development of serious hypothermia. Hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass is associated with enormous changes in body heat content. Furthermore, rapid cooling and rewarming produces large core-to-peripheral, longitudinal, and radial tissue temperature gradients. Inadequate rewarming of peripheral tissues typically produces a considerable core-to-peripheral gradient at the end of bypass. Subsequently, redistribution of heat from the core to the cooler arms and legs produces an afterdrop. Afterdrop magnitude can be reduced by prolonging rewarming, pharmacologic vasodilation, or peripheral warming. Postoperative return to normothermia occurs when brain anesthetic concentration decreases sufficiently to again trigger normal thermoregulatory defenses. However, residual anesthesia and opioids given for treatment of postoperative pain decreases the effectiveness of these responses. Consequently, return to normothermia often needs 2-5 h, depending on the degree of hypothermia and the age of the patient.

Body Temperature Regulation↗
PubMed1991

[Spinal anesthesia].

The article deals with some aspects of spinal anesthesia. It analyses in the light of possible complications the results of spinal anesthesia conducted in 4,186 cases with 1% sovcaine (cinchocaine hydrochloride) solution and 5% novocaine (procaine hydrochloride) solution by 60 surgeons. Spinal anesthesia was applied in patients, whose ages ranged from 11 to 96 years, in various operations. Contraindications for the method were determined. The author appraises comparatively spinal anesthesia with the related peridural anesthesia and discusses the prospects of the development of the method with the existence of new anesthetics and very thin needles for puncture of the subarachnoid space, which leads to the minimum number of possible complications.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1996

Desflurane is not associated with faster operating room exit times in outpatients.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the influence of anesthetic technique and primary drug on operating room (OR) exit time (time between end of surgery until time patient exists the OR) after addition of desflurane to the hospital formulary. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Ambulatory surgery unit of a university hospital. PATIENTS: 1,568 outpatients requiring anesthesia. INTERVENTIONS: Addition of desflurane to the hospital formulary, and substitution of desflurane vaporizers for enflurane vaporizers in the ambulatory surgery unit. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The following information was recorded for all anesthetic encounters over a six-month time interval: demographics, duration of surgery, primary anesthetic technique, primary anesthetic drug, and exit times. General anesthesia was used in 907 patients [desflurane: 209 patients, isoflurane: 429 patients, halothane: 192 patients, propofol: 72 patients, other intravenous (i.v.): 5 patients], major conduction anesthesia (spinal and epidural) in 43 patients, peripheral nerve blocks in 90 patients, and i.v. sedation in 528 patients. The exit time was significantly greater ( < 0.05) in patients who received general anesthesia (mean +/- SEM 14 +/- 0.2 min) compared with spinal/epidural (8 +/- 0.7 min), nerve blocks (8 +/- 0.4 min) and i.v. sedation (7 +/- 0.2 min). Exit times were longer in older patients receiving general anesthesia (exit time = 12.3 + 0.04 x age, SE = 6.7 min, p < 0.0009), whereas exit times were shorter in older individuals receiving i.v. sedation (exit time = 8.97 - 0.038 x age, SE = 3.6 min, p < 0.0001). For patients receiving i.v. sedation, exit times were shorter as duration of surgery increased (exit time = 7.86 - 0.015 x duration of surgery, SE = 3.6 min, p < 0.0002). Primary anesthetic drug did not affect exit times. CONCLUSION: Regional anesthesia and i.v. sedation were associated with faster OR exit times compared with general anesthesia. Despite desflurane's shorter elimination kinetics and recovery characteristics, use of this drug did not result in shorter exit times.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

[The role of nurse anesthetist in Taiwan (questionnaire report)].

BACKGROUND: Anesthesia as a specialty was introduced to Taiwan for over 40 years. In early days, there were quite a number of nurse anesthetists who were trained to share the heavy burden of anesthetic work. However, due to the increasing demand for better anesthetic quality, the role of nurse anesthetists is open to discussion. METHODS: Questionnaires were sent to anesthesiologists working in medical centers, regional hospitals, and district hospitals. We hoped to find out the present working condition of nurse anesthetists and what their future role would be. RESULTS: Over one-half of the questionnaires collected agree that nurse anesthetists should not conduct anesthesia by their own, and that they should only help prepare patients and drugs for anesthesia. CONCLUSIONS: Anesthesia as a highly specialized field of medicine should be conducted by qualified and well trained anesthesiologists only. Training for nurse anesthetists should be confined to preparation of drugs and care of patients only.

Anesthesiology↗
PubMed1997

Acute gastric aspiration: prevention and treatment.

Pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents is a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality for patients during labor. The risk is increased in those women who require obstetric surgery and general anesthesia. Furthermore, gastric aspiration is believed to be largely preventable. Care providers can reduce the risk by limiting oral intake during labor and assuming that all parturients have a full stomach. Conduction anesthesia should be encouraged over general anesthesia. Having a skilled anesthesiologist available is optimal. Prophylactic use of antacids, H2 receptor antagonists, and/or the use of dopamine antagonists should be administered before obstetric surgery to raise the pH and decrease the volume of gastric contents. Should aspiration occur, prompt recognition, treatment, and monitoring will improve outcome.

Anesthesia↗
PubMed2003

Comparison of retrobulbar anesthesia and intracameral anesthesia using preservative free bupivacaine hydrochloride 0.5% in phacoemulsification with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the retrobulbar anesthesia and intracameral anesthesia using preservative-free bupivacaine hydrochloride 0.5% in terms of effectiveness, complications and comfort to the patient during phacoemulsification with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation. METHODS: This was a hospital based comparative study of two methods of anesthesia, conducted at LRBT Free Eye and Cancer Hospital, Lahore from January to July 2000. Study included 200 patients with uncomplicated age-related cataract, equally divided in two groups on simple random basis. Group A (100 patients) received the retrobulbar anesthesia and Group B (100 patients) received the intracameral anesthesia with bupivacaine hydrochloride 0.5% for phacoemulsification with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation. Outcome measures like pain, visual acuity, intraocular pressure and anterior chamber reaction were compared. RESULTS: On day 1, 79% of the patients in group A and 82% patients in group B had unaided visual acuity ranging between 6/6-6/18. On day 7, this was 88% in group A and 89% group B. On day 1, 99% in group A and 98% in group B had <1+ cells in the anterior chamber while on day 7 this increased up to 100%. On day 1, 97% in group A and 98% group B had intraocular pressure less than 20 mmHg. On day 7, it increased up to 100% in both groups. 97% patients in group A and 96% patients in group B had painless surgery. Results were analysed using computer software SPSS version 10.0. Results showed no significant statistical difference between two groups in terms of pain, visual acuity, intraocular pressure, anterior chamber reaction and patient comfort. CONCLUSION: In the hands of expert surgeons and in selected patients, intracameral anesthesia with preservative-free bupivacaine hydrochloride 0.5% is a safe and effective technique of ocular anesthesia for phacoemulsification with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation.

Aged↗