Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “ADENOIDECTOMY”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 433 records · Page 24Linked to original sources

Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty with tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy as a treatment for obstructive sleep apnea in neurologically impaired children.

RATIONALE: Children with neurologic impairment often present with airway obstruction that may require intervention. No single method of airway intervention is universally appropriate and effective in this patient population. This study was performed to examine the effectiveness of using adenotonsillectomy and uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP) in resolving obstructive apnea (OA) in patients with neurologic impairment. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 15 patients with neurologic impairment and OA treated with adenotonsillectomy and UPPP between 1986 and 1998 at Children's Hospital of Wisconsin (CHW) was performed. All patients in the series had their primary area of obstruction in the posterior oropharynx involving the soft palate, pharyngeal walls and base of tongue. Post-operative improvement following adenotonsillectomy and UPPP was examined. Measures of improvement were based primarily on recorded lowest oxygen saturations, but clinical parameters, flexible upper airway endoscopy and polysomnography were used as well. RESULTS: Patient improvement was documented in 87% of patients treated with this modality. For the group, the mean lowest recorded oxygen saturation demonstrated a statistically significant improvement from 65% pre-operatively to 85% post-operatively (P = 0.005). In long-term follow-up of these patients, 77% (10 of 13) of those showing initial improvement have done well and have required no further airway intervention. However, 23% of these patients demonstrated the need for further airway intervention during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Adenotonsillectomy with UPPP is worthy of consideration in certain neurologically impaired patients with moderate to severe OA, limited primarily to the posterior pharyngeal area. Initial improvement may not be permanent and close long-term follow-up of patients is imperative.

Adenoidectomy↗

Complications of tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy.

Adenotonsillectomy is generally safe surgery, but surgeons should be cognizant of potential complications and be prepared to manage them. Postoperative hemorrhage usually responds to local measures or cautery but can be life-threatening. Preoperative screening of coagulation profiles appears unnecessary. Anesthetic risks have declined with modern techniques, but airway risks, aspiration, and pulmonary edema are possible. Nasopharyngeal valving may be altered by velopharyngeal incompetence or nasopharyngeal stenosis. Sore throat, otalgia, fever, dehydration, and uvular edema are more common postoperative complaints. Less common complications include atlantoaxial subluxation, mandible condyle fracture, infection, eustachian tube injury, and psychological trauma. The prevalence, management, and strategies for avoidance of these are discussed.

Adenoidectomy↗

Tonsillectomy, adenoidectomy and adenotonsillectomy: are they safe day case procedures?

A review of 3,488 tonsil and adenoid procedures performed between March 1987 and April 1990 is presented. A reactionary haemorrhage rate of 0.49 per cent was found. No deaths were recorded. All cases of reactionary haemorrhage occurred within the first eight hours post-operatively. Based on this study, out-patient tonsil and adenoid surgery should be followed by at least an eight hour postoperative observation period before discharge. If day case adenoid and tonsil surgery is adopted, close medical audit would be necessary to detect and then prevent any possible increase in morbidity or mortality.

Adenoidectomy↗

Suction diathermy adenoidectomy.

This technique uses a combination of monopolar diathermy and suction to perform a controlled resection of the adenoids in a near bloodless field. A clear view of the entire resection is obtained with a mirror. There is minimal blood loss and postoperative haemorrhage rate is extremely low. The authors describe the technique used and discuss their experience.

Adenoidectomy↗

Preoperative screening for coagulation disorders in children undergoing adenoidectomy (AT) and tonsillectomy (TE): does it prevent bleeding complications?

BACKGROUND: Bleeding remains the most important complication of adenotonsillectomy in children. Preoperative coagulation tests are widely used to detect unknown bleeding disorders. To determine the efficacy of preoperative coagulation screening in preventing bleeding complications. PATIENTS: Study group 1: 148 healthy children referred by the otorhinolaryngology department for preoperative pediatric examination. Study group 2: 124 healthy children sent to the hemostaseologic clinic for preoperative investigation of a prolonged PTT. METHOD: The incidence of relevant coagulation disorders detected by a standardized bleeding history and coagulation screening tests was studied prospectively in 2 study groups planned for AT and/or TE. The frequency of abnormal bleeding was investigated retrospectively in those children who underwent surgery. RESULTS: Bleeding disorders were detected in 7/148 and 15/124 children in study group 1 and 2 respectively. 141/148 and 79/124 children actually underwent surgery, 62 TE +/- AT + 79 AT alone and 26 TE +/- AT + 53 AT alone respectively. Major bleeding occurred in 1/141 patients (1 TE) in study group 1. Preoperatively, this child had shown normal coagulation screening tests. In 4/79 patients (3 TE, 1 AT) in study group 2, surgery was complicated by major bleeding. Despite extensive testing, no relevant bleeding disorder had been diagnosed in these children preoperatively. Sensitivity of coagulation screening tests for major bleeding was 0 in study group 1. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, coagulation screening failed to effectively identify patients at risk of bleeding.

Adenoidectomy↗