Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Systematic Reviews as Topic”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 415 records · Page 23Linked to original sources
PubMed2003

An update of the Cochrane systematic review of Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy in nonulcer dyspepsia: resolving the discrepancy between systematic reviews.

OBJECTIVES: A Cochrane systematic review on the efficacy of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication therapy in nonulcer dyspepsia concluded that this intervention had a small but statistically significant effect in curing symptoms. A systematic review in the Annals of Internal Medicine suggested that there was no statistically significant effect of H. pylori eradication therapy on nonulcer dyspepsia symptoms. We updated the Cochrane review and explored reasons for these discrepant results. METHODS: In our update of the Cochrane review we included randomized controlled trials evaluating H. pylori eradication in nonulcer dyspepsia published up to September, 2002. A statistician and the lead author of two negative randomized controlled trials explored reasons for the differences between the Cochrane and Annals systematic reviews according to the review methodology, data analyzed, and statistical methods. Sensitivity analyses were undertaken to evaluate which differences had an impact on the review conclusions. RESULTS: The updated review identified 12 trials evaluating H. pylori eradication versus placebo antibiotics in 2903 patients. H. pylori eradication reduced nonulcer dyspepsia (nonulcer dyspepsia relative risk = 0.91; 95% CI = 0.86-0.95). We identified five differences in methodology between the Cochrane and Annals reviews. The Annals review included all dual, triple, and quadruple H. pylori eradication therapies searched until December, 1999; did not contact authors for further information; included abstracts; and assumed that dropouts were treatment failures. The Cochrane review included only those therapies proved to be successful in eradicating H. pylori; searched until May, 2000; contacted authors for further information; included abstracts only if further information was available; and excluded dropouts from the analysis. Not including trials published in 2000 reduced the number of trials in the review and the number of patients evaluated, changing the conclusions from evidence of benefit to benefit not being proved. The method of statistical analysis did not alter conclusions when all studies were included. CONCLUSIONS: The results of systematic reviews in a rapidly developing field depend on inclusion of all relevant studies. There is evidence for a small benefit of eradicating H. pylori in nonulcer dyspepsia, and this is confirmed by updating the Cochrane systematic review.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed2000

Anticonvulsants for women with pre-eclampsia.

BACKGROUND: Pre-eclampsia is a relatively common complication of pregnancy. Anticonvulsants are used in the belief they help prevent eclamptic fits and subsequent poor outcomes for mother and infant. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review was to assess the effects of anticonvulsants for women with pre-eclampsia on the women and their children. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, 1999 Issue 3. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials comparing anticonvulsants with placebo or no anticonvulsants or comparisons of different anticonvulsants in women with pre-eclampsia. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Trial quality was assessed and data were extracted independently by two reviewers. MAIN RESULTS: Nine studies were included. Comparing magnesium sulphate with placebo/no anticonvulsant the relative risk (RR) of eclampsia was 0.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.11 to 1.02. There was no significant difference detected in the risk of caesarean section (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.17). Magnesium sulphate appeared to be better than phenytoin at reducing the risk of eclampsia (RR 0.05, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.84). However there was an increased risk of caesarean section with magnesium sulphate compared to phenytoin (RR 1.21, 95% CI 1.05 to 1. 41). No statistically significant differences were reported for any other clinically important outcomes. Studies comparing magnesium sulphate and diazepam were too small for any reliable conclusions. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: There is not enough evidence to establish the benefits and hazards of anticonvulsants for women with pre-eclampsia. If an anticonvulsant is used, magnesium sulphate appears to be the best choice.

Anticonvulsants↗
PubMed2000

Interventions for treating gonorrhoea in pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: Neisseria gonorrhoeae can be transmitted from the mother's genital tract to the newborn during birth and can cause gonococcal opthalmia neonatorum. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review was to assess the effects of antibiotic regimens in the treatment of genital infection with gonorrhoea during pregnancy with respect to neonatal and maternal morbidity. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register were searched. Date of last search: October 1998. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials of one regimen of antibiotic versus another in pregnant women with culture confirmed genital gonococcal infection. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Eligibility and trial quality were assessed by one reviewer. MAIN RESULTS: Two trials involving 329 women were included. Amoxycillin with probenicid or spectinomycin or ceftriaxone have a similar effect on microbiological cure, defined by negative gonococcal culture. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Any of the antibiotic regimens tested in these trials appear to be effective for the treatment of gonorrhoea in pregnancy in terms of their effect on microbiological cure. For women who are allergic to penicillin, this review provides reassurance that treatment with ceftriaxone or spectinomycin appears to be at least as equally effective in producing microbiological cure.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed2000

Magnesium sulphate versus diazepam for eclampsia.

BACKGROUND: A number of different anticonvulsants are used to control eclamptic fits and to prevent future seizures. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review was to assess the effects of magnesium sulphate compared with diazepam when used for the care of women with eclampsia. Magnesium sulphate is compared with phenytoin and with lytic cocktail (in preparation) in other Cochrane reviews. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth trials register and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, 1999 Issue 3. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials comparing magnesium sulphate (intravenous or intramuscular administration) with diazepam for women with a clinical diagnosis of eclampsia. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Trial quality was assessed and data extraction was done by the two reviewers. MAIN RESULTS: Five trials involving 1236 women were included. Most of these trials were of good quality. Magnesium sulphate was associated with a substantial reduction in the recurrence of convulsions, when compared to diazepam (relative risk 0.45, 95% confidence interval 0.35 to 0.58). Maternal mortality was also reduced, although this difference was borderline for statistical significance (relative risk 0.60, 95% CI 0.36-1.00). There are no differences in any other measures of outcome, except for fewer Apgar scores <7 at five minutes (relative risk 0.72, 95% CI 0.55-0.94) and in length of stay in SCBU >7 days (relative risk 0. 66, 95% CI 0.46-0.95) associated with magnesium sulphate. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Magnesium sulphate appears to be substantially more effective than diazepam for treatment of eclampsia.

Anticonvulsants↗
PubMed2000

Prophylactic intravenous preloading for regional analgesia in labour.

BACKGROUND: Fetal heart rate changes are common following regional analgesia during labour. Reduced uterine blood flow from maternal hypotension may contribute to this. Intravenous fluid preloading (volume expansion) may help to reduce maternal hypotension. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review was to assess the effects of prophylactic intravenous fluid preloading prior to epidural analgesia during labour on maternal and fetal well-being. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trial register and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register were searched. Date of last search: December 1997. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and quasi-randomised trials comparing prophylactic intravenous preloading before epidural analgesia during labour with a control group (dummy or no preloading). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The reviewer assessed trial quality and extracted data. MAIN RESULTS: One study involving 102 women was included. There was potential for considerable bias in this trial. Preloading with intravenous fluids was associated with a reduction in hypotension (relative risk 0.07, 95% confidence interval 0.01 to 0.53). It was also associated with a reduction in fetal heart rate abnormalities (relative risk 0.36, 95% confidence interval 0.16 to 0.83). No differences were detected in other perinatal and maternal outcomes. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: There are methodological limitations in the only trial of preloading with intravenous fluids prior to epidural analgesia. However preloading may have beneficial fetal and maternal effects in healthy women. Further investigation of the risks and benefits of intravenous preloading for women with pregnancy complications is required.

Anesthesia, Epidural↗
PubMed2000

Benzodiazepines for neuroleptic-induced tardive dyskinesia.

BACKGROUND: Tardive dyskinesia (TD) is a potentially disfiguring movement disorder of the orofacial region often caused by use of neuroleptic drugs. A wide range of strategies have been used to help manage TD and, for those who are unable to have their antipsychotic medication stopped or substantially changed, the benzodiazapine group of drugs has been suggested as a useful adjunctive treatment. OBJECTIVES: To determine the clinical efficacy of benzodiazepines for people with neuroleptic-induced tardive dyskinesia (TD) schizophrenia or other chronic mental illnesses. SEARCH STRATEGY: Electronic searches of Biological Abstracts (1982-1995), the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Register of trials (1995), EMBASE (1980-1995), LILACS (1982-1995), MEDLINE (1966-1995), PsycLIT (1974-1995), SCISEARCH (1995) and handsearching the references of all identified studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: The inclusion criteria for all randomised studies were that they should focus on people with schizophrenia or other chronic mental illnesses and neuroleptic-induced TD and compare the use of benzodiazepines to placebo or no intervention. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The reviewers extracted the data independently and the odds ratio (95% CI) or the average difference (95% CI) were estimated. The reviewers assumed that people who dropped out had no improvement. MAIN RESULTS: Two trials were able to be included in this review. The results of this review do not allow any confident interpretations on the clinical utility of benzodiazepines for the treatment of neuroleptic-induced TD. From the data combined in this review, benzodiazepines have no distinct advantages over placebo in the treatment of TD. Data on side effects were not reported in the included trials. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: No clear statement about the efficacy of benzodiazepines drugs, to treat neuroleptic-induced TD, could be provided.

Anti-Anxiety Agents↗
PubMed2000

Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) supplementation for cognition and well-being.

BACKGROUND: In view of the theoretical rationale for beneficial effects of DHEA and DHEAS in aging and dementia, we believe it is timely to undertake a thorough investigation of well-conducted studies in this area. This will provide a basis for confirmation of any effect of DHEA/S administration in humans, in large-scale and properly controlled trials, which would evaluate effective dosage, acceptable route and duration of administration and side effect profiles. This is especially pertinent at this time as DHEA is currently being sold in large quantities in health food stores, particularly in the USA. In some cases the recommended dose is different for men and women (50mg/day for men and 25mg/day for women) and the basis for this recommendation needs to be explored. OBJECTIVES: To establish whether administration of DHEA, or its sulphate, DHEAS, improves psychological well-being and/or improves cognitive function or reduces the rate of decline of cognitive function in older adults or in individuals with dementia. SEARCH STRATEGY: All available electronic databases, hand searched journals, personal communications and conference abstracts were searched for randomised controlled trials of DHEA in well-being and cognition. The total yield from searching was 415 and the detailed breakdown is given in the body of this review. SELECTION CRITERIA: All relevant randomised controlled trials of DHEA or DHEAS were considered for inclusion in the review. Studies where groups are matched, rather than randomised, were also considered. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data for the specified outcomes were independently extracted by two reviewers (FAH & JvN) and cross-checked. Any discrepancies were discussed and resolved. Where possible and appropriate, data were pooled and the mean differences estimated. MAIN RESULTS: The published DHEA trials fall into 2 categories: 1. four German studies in which DHEA was administered for a period of two weeks or less; 2. a USA study in which DHEA was administered for three months. Well-being was assessed in both sets of studies and a significant improvement was reported in the longer duration USA study, while no effect was reported in the shorter duration studies. The USA study used an open-ended questionnaire for self-assessment of well-being and stated that 67% of men and 82% of women reported enhanced well-being on DHEA compared with placebo. There was no significant change on an analogue measure of libido. The German studies assessed mood and well-being with a number of standardised scales and reported no significant effects of DHEA on any of them. Only the German studies examined performance on cognitive tests, i.e. memory, verbal fluency, speed of processing, etc. They reported no significant benefit of DHEA. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: The data at present offer limited support for improvement in a sense of well-being following DHEA treatment. This effect was reported only in the longer-term study which used a crude measure of well-being. The data offer no support at present for an improvement in memory or other aspects of cognitive function following DHEA treatment, although cognitive function was only measured in the short-duration trials. In view of the growing public enthusiasm for DHEA supplementation, particularly in the USA, it is clear that high-quality trials need to be undertaken in older adults, in which (a) the duration of DHEA treatment is in excess of two weeks, (b) the number of participants is large enough to detect effects if they exist, and (c) the outcome measures include validated scales for assessment of mood and well-being, and objective tests of cognitive function. Recently, studies of DHEA supplementation in clinical depression and Alzheimer's Disease have been completed in the USA. As soon as the results are available these studies will be reviewed. Currently, two trials (in France and the USA) in normal elderly are in progress.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Vaccines for preventing cholera.

BACKGROUND: Oral cholera vaccines (either killed whole cell or live recombinant vaccines) are newer alternatives to the parenteral vaccines which have been thought to confer only moderate and short-term immunity. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review was to assess the effect of cholera vaccines in preventing cases of cholera and preventing deaths. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group trials register, Medline, Embase and reference lists of articles. We handsearched the journal Vaccine, contacted researchers in the field and manufacturers. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and quasi-randomised studies comparing cholera vaccines (killed or live) with placebo, control vaccines or no intervention, or comparing types, doses or schedules of cholera vaccine. We included adults and children irrespective of immune status or special risk category. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data extraction and assessment of trial quality was done independently by two reviewers. MAIN RESULTS: Thirty-two trials were included. Seventeen efficacy trials of relatively good quality, testing parenteral and oral killed whole cell vaccines and involving over 2. 6 million adults, children and infants were included. Nineteen safety trials have been conducted for both types of killed whole cell vaccines and for live vaccines and have involved 11,459 people. For all types of vaccines compared to placebo, the relative risk of contracting cholera at 12 months was 0.49, 95% confidence interval 0. 41 to 0.59 (random effects model). This translates to an efficacy of 51%, 95% confidence interval 41% to 59%. Both parenteral and oral administration were relatively efficacious, but significant protection extended into the third year for oral killed whole cell vaccines. Children under 5 were only protected for up to a year, while older children or adults were protected for up to three years. Parenteral killed whole cell vaccines were associated with increased systemic and local adverse effects compared to placebo. Oral killed whole cell vaccines or oral live vaccines were not. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Cholera killed whole cell vaccines appear to be relatively effective and safe. Live oral recombinant vaccines appear to be safe, but efficacy data are not available. Protection against cholera appears to persist for up to two years following a single dose of vaccine, and for three to four years with an annual booster.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Dopamine versus dobutamine for hypotensive preterm infants.

BACKGROUND: Inotropes are widely used in preterm infants to treat systemic hypotension. The most commonly used drugs are dopamine and dobutamine. These agents have different modes of action which may result in different haemodynamic effects. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness and safety of dopamine and dobutamine in the treatment of systemic hypotension in preterm infants. SEARCH STRATEGY: The standard search method of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group was used. Searches of electronic and other databases were performed. Previous reviews were searched for references to relevant trials and leading authors in the field were contacted for information about other published and unpublished studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials where short and/or long term effects of treatment with dopamine and dobutamine for the treatment of systemic arterial hypotension were compared were selected for this review. Trials studying newborn infants born before 37 completed weeks gestation and less than 28 days of age were eligible for inclusion. Systemic arterial hypotension was not defined specifically, but accepted as defined in individual studies. Studies were not limited by birthweight, lower gestational age threshold or by route or duration of administration of inotropic agents. Study quality and eligibility were assessed independently by each reviewer. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The standard method of the Cochrane Collaboration described in the Cochrane Collaboration Handbook was used to perform this systematic review. Data extraction was performed independently by each reviewer, with differences being resolved by discussion. The following outcomes were determined: mortality in the neonatal period, long term neurodevelopmental outcome, radiological evidence of severe neurological injury, short term haemodynamic changes and incidence of adverse effects. The effect of interventions is expressed either as Relative Risk (RR), Risk Difference (RD) or as Weighted Mean Difference (WMD) with their 95% Confidence Interval (CI). MAIN RESULTS: Four trials met the pre-defined criteria for inclusion in this review. There was no evidence of a significant difference between dopamine and dobutamine in terms of neonatal mortality (RD 0.02 95% CI -0.12 to 0.16), incidence of periventricular leukomalacia (RD -0.08, 95% CI -0.19 to 0.04), or severe periventricular haemorrhage (RD -0.02, 95% CI -0.13 to 0.09). Dopamine was more successful than dobutamine in treating systemic hypotension, with fewer infants having treatment failure (RD -0.29, 95% CI -0.42 to -0.17; NNT = 3.5, 95% CI 2.4 to 5.9). There was no evidence of a significant difference in change in left ventricular output when dopamine was compared with dobutamine (WMD -83 ml/kg/min, 95% CI -174 to 8 ml/kg/min). There was no evidence of a significant difference between the two agents with respect to the incidence of tachycardia (RD -0.06, 95% CI -0.25 to 0.14). None of the studies reported the incidence of adverse long term neurodevelopmental outcome. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Dopamine is more effective than dobutamine in the short term treatment of systemic hypotension in preterm infants. There was no evidence of an effect on the incidence of adverse neuroradiological sequelae (severe periventricular haemorrhage and/or periventricular leucomalacia), or on the incidence of tachycardia. However, in the absence of data confirming long term benefit and safety of dopamine compared to dobutamine, no firm recommendations can be made regarding the choice of drug to treat hypotension.

Cardiotonic Agents↗
PubMed2000

Postnatal phenobarbitone for the prevention of intraventricular hemorrhage in preterm infants.

BACKGROUND: This section is under preparation and will be included in the next issue. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether postnatal administration of phenobarbitone to preterm infants reduces the risk of intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), neurodevelopmental impairment or death. SEARCH STRATEGY: See the Search Strategy of the Neonatal Collaborative Review Group. The reviewer has been a active trialist in this area and has personal contact with many groups in this field. Journals handsearched from 1976 (when cranial CT scanning started) to November 1998 include: Pediatrics, J Pediatrics, Archives of Disease in Childhood, Pediatric Research, Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, Acta Paediatrica, European J of Pediatrics, Neuropediatrics, New England J of Medicine, Lancet and British Medical J. The National Library of Medicine (USA) database (via PubMed) and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register were searched through to November 1998 using the MeSH terms intraventricular hemorrhage, newborn infants, premature infant, intracranial hemorrhage, phenobarbitone, phenobarbital. The searches were not limited to the English language, as long as the article included an English abstract. Promising articles were read in the original language or translated. SELECTION CRITERIA: Included were randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials in which phenobarbitone was given to preterm infants identified as being at risk of IVH because of gestational age below 34 weeks, birthweight below 1500 g, or respiratory failure. Adequate determination of IVH by ultrasound or CT was also required. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: In addition to details of patient selection and control of bias, the details of the administration of phenobarbitone were extracted. The end-points searched for included: IVH ( with grading), posthemorrhagic ventricular dilatation or hydrocephalus, neurodevelopmental impairment and death. In addition, possible adverse effects of phenobarbitone such as hypotension, mechanical ventilation, pneumothorax, hypercapnia, and acidosis were searched for. MAIN RESULTS: Nine controlled trials were included with 740 infants recruited. There was heterogeneity between trials for the outcome IVH, with one trial finding a significant decrease in IVH and another trial finding an increase in IVH in the group receiving phenobarbitone. Meta-analysis showed no difference between the phenobarbitone treated group and the control group in either IVH (typical relative risk 1.04, CI 0.87, 1.25), severe IVH (typical relative risk 0.91, CI 0.66, 1.27), posthemorrhagic ventricular dilatation (typical relative risk 0.89, CI 0.38, 2.08), severe neurodevelopmental impairment (typical relative risk 1.44, CI 0.41, 5.04) or death before hospital discharge (typical relative risk 0.88, CI 0.64, 1.21) There was a consistent trend in the trials towards increased use of mechanical ventilation in the phenobarbitone treated group, which was supported by the meta-analysis (typical relative risk 1.18, CI 1.06, 1.32; typical risk difference 0.129, CI 0.045, 0.213), but there was no significant difference in pneumothorax, acidosis or hypercapnia. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Postnatal administration of phenobarbitone cannot be recommended as prophylaxis to prevent IVH in preterm infants and is associated with an increased need for mechanical ventilation.

Cerebral Hemorrhage↗
PubMed2000

Erythromycin for feeding intolerance in preterm infants.

BACKGROUND: Functional immaturity of gastointestinal motility predisposes preterm infants to feeding intolerance. Motilin, a gastrointestinal peptide, stimulates propagative contractile activity during phase III of the migratory motor complex in the interdigestive state. Erythromycin (EM) is a motilin agonist with prokinetic effect at low doses (1-3mg/kg). OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of EM in promoting gastrointestinal motility in preterm infants with feeding intolerance and assess clinically significant adverse effects associated with its use. SEARCH STRATEGY: Systematic literature search in accordance with the Cochrane Neonatal Collaborative Review Group search strategy. Randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials of EM use, at any dose, in preterm infants to promote gastrointestinal motility were identified by searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, reference lists of published studies, personal files, and abstracts published in Pediatric Research. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials of oral or intravenous EM use at dose range of 3 to 12 mg/kg/day in preterm infants less than or equal to 36 weeks gestational age with feeding tolerance were included in this review. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data regarding the primary clinical outcome of days to achieve full enteral feeding were compared among studies. Data on secondary outcomes including adverse effects associated with the use of EM (diarrhea, nosocomial infections, cardiac arrhythmias, or theophylline toxicity), duration of parenteral nutrition, weight gain, incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), hypertrophic pyloric stenosis, and length of hospital stay were assessed. MAIN RESULTS: Two randomized controlled studies of EM use in preterm infants for improving gastrointestinal motility were identified. Since both studies involved preterm infants treated with EM at dose >12mg/kg/day at commencement of feeding, they did not meet inclusion criteria defined a priori for this review. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of NEC (RR 0.59, 95%CI 0.11, 3.01; RD -0.021, 95%CI -0. 087, 0.045). No statistically significant difference was noted in days to achieve full enteral feeds, length of hospital stay, and adverse events between groups. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: EM at antimicrobial doses may not be effective in preterm infants with feeding intolerance. Further studies are needed to determine whether EM in lower doses is effective as a prokinetic agent in such infants.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed2000

Tricyclic and related drugs for nocturnal enuresis in children.

BACKGROUND: Enuresis (bedwetting) is a socially unacceptable and stressful condition which affects around 15-20% of five year olds, and up to 2% of young adults. Although there is a high rate of spontaneous remission, the social, emotional and psychological costs to the children can be great. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of tricyclic and related drugs on nocturnal enuresis in children, and to compare them with other interventions. SEARCH STRATEGY: The following electronic databases were searched: MEDLINE to June 1997; AMED; ASSIA; BIDS; BIOSIS Previews (1985-1996); CINAHL; DHSS Data; EMBASE (1974 to June 1997); PsycLIT and SIGLE. Organisations, manufacturers, researchers and health professionals concerned with enuresis were contacted for information. The reference sections of obtained studies were also checked for further trials. Date of the most recent search: July 1997. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised trials of tricyclic and related drugs for nocturnal enuresis in children were included in the review. Trials were eligible for inclusion if: children were randomised to receive tricyclics compared with placebo, other drugs or other conservative interventions for nocturnal bedwetting; participants with organic causes for their bedwetting were excluded; and baseline assessments of the level of bedwetting were provided. Trials focused solely on daytime wetting were excluded. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed the quality of the eligible trials, and extracted data. MAIN RESULTS: Twenty two randomised trials, involving 1100 children treated with tricyclic or related drugs, met the inclusion criteria. The quality of many of the trials was poor. Only single trials compared tricyclic or related drugs with each other, other drugs, desmopressin, alarms or other behavioural interventions. Treatment with tricyclic drugs (such as imipramine, amitriptyline, viloxazine, clomipramine and desipramine but not mianserin) were associated with a reduction of about one wet night per week while on treatment (eg using imipramine, WMD -0.99, 95% CI -1.27 to -0.71). Children were almost five times more likely to achieve 14 dry nights with the drugs (eg using imipramine, RR = 4.99, 95% CI 2.4 to 10.40). Desmopressin and tricyclics appeared equally effective while on treatment, but this effect was not sustained after treatment stopped. There was no detectable difference between imipramine and alarms while on treatment, but afterwards those who had used alarms had one fewer wet night per week (WMD 1.03, 95% CI 0. 19 to 1.87). REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with tricyclic drugs (imipramine, amitriptyline, viloxazine, clomipramine and desipramine but not mianserin) was associated with a reduction of about one wet night per week while on treatment, but long term effectiveness is unknown. Desmopressin and tricyclics appeared equally effective while on treatment, but this effect was not sustained after treatment stopped. Alarms may be more effective in the long term. Comparisons between drug and behavioural treatments are needed, and should include relapse rates after treatment is finished.

Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic↗
PubMed2000

Inhaled vs oral steroids for adults with chronic asthma.

OBJECTIVES: To determine therapeutically equivalent doses of inhaled versus oral steroids for adults with chronic asthma. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Airways Group trials register was searched using the terms: (drug delivery systems OR ((nebuli* OR inhal* OR MDI) AND oral*)) AND ( steroid* OR corticosteroid* OR glucocorticoid* OR beclomethasone OR betamethasone OR fluticasone OR cortisone OR dexamethasone OR hydrocortisone OR prednisolone OR prednisone OR triamcinolone). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials were selected of at least 4 weeks duration and included patients over the age of 15 years with chronic asthma. Trials compared inhaled steroids and oral prednisolone or prednisone; where the maximum dose for inhaled steroids was 2000 mcg/day and prednisolone 60 mg (on alternate days). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two independent reviewers screened 1285 titles and abstracts from the electronic search, bibliography searches and other contacts. Of these, 10 trials met previously defined inclusion criteria. Two reviewers independently extracted study characteristics, and outcome measures. MAIN RESULTS: All trials were small and no data could be pooled. Carry-over effects were present in at least one cross-over trial. Data from six trials produced the same pattern, in which prednisolone 7.5-12 mg/day appeared to be as effective as inhaled steroid 300-2000 mcg/day. In two trials, inhaled steroid 300-400 mcg/day was more effective than prednisolone 5 mg/day. All doses of inhaled steroid appeared to be more effective than alternate day doses of prednisolone up to 60 mg on alternate days. Side-effect data were reported too variably to permit comparisons. A 30% incidence was reported in one study in patients receiving prednisolone 5 mg/day, none were reported in patients on inhaled steroids. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: A daily dose of prednisolone 7.5-10 mg/day appears to be equivalent to moderate-high dose inhaled corticosteroids. Side-effects may be present on low doses, so if there is no alternative to oral steroids, the lowest effective dose should be prescribed.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed2000

Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors in normotensive diabetic patients with microalbuminuria.

OBJECTIVES: To examine whether the progression of early diabetic renal disease to end-stage renal failure may be slowed by the use of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors for reasons other than their antihypertensive properties, so that they have value in the treatment of normotensive diabetics with microalbuminuria. SEARCH STRATEGY: MEDLINE was searched for English language reviews and randomised controlled trials. Personal reference lists, and reference lists of retrieved studies were also used. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials with separate identifiable results for initially normotensive diabetic patients, who received angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors for at least one year and were compared with controls. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Meta-analyses were performed on the results of 11 randomised controlled trials with a variety of patient inclusion and exclusion criteria. MAIN RESULTS: Albumin excretion rate fell for patients on angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition in 10 of the 11 studies but did so for only two of the 11 groups on placebo. Treatment provided a significant reduction in albumin excretion rate in both insulin dependent diabetes mellitus and non insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. Treatment with either captopril, enalapril or lisinopril reduced albumin excretion rate in comparison with control patients. A greater lowering of blood pressure was experienced by initially normotensive patients in the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor than in the placebo group. Pooled end-of-study mean blood pressures for the treated group were significantly lower than for the untreated group, although this was not so for all individual studies. The apparent (treatment - placebo) 'effect' on systolic and diastolic pressures had a larger standard error for longer lasting studies. Average haemoglobin fell a little in the treated patients and rose in the controls but neither this nor the difference in changes in glomerular filtration rate reached statistical significance. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Inhibition of angiotensin converting enzyme can arrest or reduce the albumin excretion rate in microalbuminuric normotensive diabetics, as well as reduce or prevent an increase in blood pressure. But, given the drop in blood pressure in patients on angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, it is not possible to be certain that the reduction of albumin excretion rate is due to a separate renal effect. A direct link with postponement of end-stage renal failure has not been demonstrated. There appear to be no substantial side effects.

Albuminuria↗
PubMed2000

Mefloquine for preventing malaria in non-immune adult travellers.

OBJECTIVES: Mefloquine has now largely replaced earlier malaria prophylaxis drugs which are no longer considered to be effective against all Plasmodium species, due to parasite resistance. However mefloquine may be associated with neuropsychological harmful effects. The objective of this review was to assess the effects of mefloquine in adult travellers. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group trials register, Medline, Embase, Lilacs, Science Citation Index and reference lists of articles. We contacted researchers in the subject of malaria chemoprophylaxis, and drug companies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials comparing mefloquine with other standard prophylaxis or placebo in non-immune adult travellers. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The two reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Study authors were also contacted. MAIN RESULTS: Ten trials involving 2750 non-immune adult travellers were included. One trial comparing mefloquine with placebo showed mefloquine prevented malaria episodes in an area of drug resistance (odds ratio 0.04, 95% confidence interval 0.02 to 0.08). Withdrawals in the mefloquine group were consistently higher in four placebo controlled trials (odds ratio 3. 56, 95% confidence interval 1.67 to 7.60). In five trials comparing mefloquine with other chemoprophylaxis, no difference in tolerability was detected. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Mefloquine prevents malaria, but there is not enough evidence to evaluate its tolerability and toxicity, particularly for general travellers.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

[The evaluation of the quality of clinical trials: the rationale, usefulness and drawbacks].

The quality of a randomised controlled trial should be understood as its internal validity, that is, the extent in which the study conclusions show correctly what actually happened in the design and conduct phases. This validity may be compromised by multiple biases coming from the allocation of subjects to study groups, treatment administration, observation of outcome variables, patient follow-up and statistical analysis. The presence of bias is assessed through three kinds of measurements: individual components, checklists and numerical scales. In systematic reviews some kind of quality assessment is necessary, which evaluates the quality of individual trials by means of several methods: a) a threshold that sets the minimal level of quality required; b) the relationship between quality and variability in trial results; c) sensitivity analysis, and d) quality scores as weights of trials. However, there exists considerable discrepancy among the published scales whereas their usefulness to assess the quality of trials to be included in the systematic review is a matter of controversy. We hope that the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) initiative to standardize the report of randomized controlled trials and other proposals will contribute to obtain a more realistic view for each trial and to improve their internal validity.

Humans↗
PubMed2005

Controlled trials to improve antibiotic utilization: a systematic review of experience, 1984-2004.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To review the effectiveness of interventions designed to improve antibiotic prescribing patterns in clinical practice and to draw inferences about the most practical methods for optimizing antibiotic utilization in hospital and ambulatory settings. METHODS: A literature search using online databases for the years 1975-2004 identified controlled trials of strategies for improving antibiotic utilization. Due to variation in study settings and design, quantitative meta-analysis was not feasible. Therefore, a qualitative literature review was conducted. RESULTS: Forty-one controlled trials met the search criteria. Interventions consisted of education, peer review and feedback, physician participation, rewards and penalties, administrative methods, and combined approaches. Social marketing directed at patients and prescribers was effective in varying contexts, as was implementation of practice guidelines. Authorization systems with structured order entry, formulary restriction, and mandatory consultation were also effective. Peer review and feedback were more effective when combined with dissemination of relevant information or social marketing than when used alone. CONCLUSIONS: Several practices were effective in improving antibiotic utilization: social marketing, practice guidelines, authorization systems, and peer review and feedback. Online systems providing clinical information, structured order entry, and decision support may be the most promising approach. Further studies, including economic analyses, are needed to confirm or refute this hypothesis.

Decision Support Systems, Clinical↗
PubMed2000

Cyclophosphamide for rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the short-term effects of cyclophosphamide for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group's Register, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Medline and Embase up to and including July 1997. We also carried out a handsearch of the reference lists of the trials retrieved from the electronic search. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs) comparing oral cyclophosphamide against placebo (or an active drug at a dosage considered to be ineffective) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data abstraction was carried out independently by two reviewers. The same two reviewers using Jadad's scale (Jadad 1995) assessed the methodological quality of the RCTs and CCTs. Rheumatoid arthritis outcome measures were extracted from the publications for baseline and end-of-study. The pooled analysis was performed using standardized mean differences (SMDs) for joint counts. Weighted mean differences (WMDs) were used for erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). Toxicity was evaluated with pooled odds ratios for withdrawals. A chi-square test was used to assess heterogeneity among trials. Fixed effects models were used throughout. MAIN RESULTS: A total of 70 patients were included in the pooled analysis of two trials, 31 receiving cyclophosphamide. A statistically significant benefit was observed for cyclophosphamide when compared to placebo for tender and swollen joint scores: SMDs were -0.57 and -0.59 respectively. The difference in ESR also favoured the active drug but did not reach statistical significance (-12 mm, 95%CI: -26 to 2.5). One trial reported the number of patients developing new or worse erosions: the OR for cyclophosphamide compared to placebo was 0.17 (95% CI: 0.05 to 0.57). Patients receiving placebo were six times more likely to discontinue treatment because of lack of efficacy than patients receiving cyclophosphamide. Withdrawals from adverse reactions were higher in the cyclophosphamide group (Odds ratio=2.9), although this difference was not statistically significant. Side effects from cyclophosphamide included hemorrhagic cystitis, nausea, vomiting, leucopenia, thrombocytopenia, alopecia, amenorrhea and herpes zoster infections. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Cyclophosphamide appears to have a clinically and statistically significant benefit on the disease activity of patients with RA, similar to some disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) such as antimalarials or sulfasalazine, but lower than methotrexate. Toxicity however is severe, limiting its use given the low benefit-risk ratio compared to other antirheumatic agents.

Antirheumatic Agents↗