Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Sumatriptan”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 415 records · Page 23Linked to original sources
PubMed2000

The relationship between repetitive behaviors and growth hormone response to sumatriptan challenge in adult autistic disorder.

Autism is heterogeneous with respect to clinical symptoms and etiology. To sort out this heterogeneity in autism, we investigated whether specific neurobiological markers vary in parallel to core symptomatology. Specifically, we assessed growth hormone response to the 5-HT 1d agonist, sumatriptan, and linked this measure of serotonergic function to the severity of repetitive behaviors in adult autistic patients. Eleven adult patients with autism or Asperger's disorder were randomized to single dose sumatriptan (6 mg SQ) and placebo challenges, separated by a one-week interval. In adult autistic disorders, severity of repetitive behaviors at baseline, as measured by YBOCS-compulsion score, significantly positively correlated with both peak delta growth hormone response and area under the curve growth hormone response to sumatriptan. Thus, the severity of a specific behavioral dimension in autism (repetitive behaviors) parallels the sensitivity of the 5-HT 1d receptor, as manifest by sumatriptan elicited GH response.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Comparative clinical pharmacokinetics of single doses of sumatriptan following subcutaneous, oral, rectal and intranasal administration.

Sumatriptan, a 5-HT1 receptor agonist active for the acute treatment of migraine, is currently available as subcutaneous injection and oral tablets. Rectal or intranasal formulations may offer advantages over those marketed. This study compared the pharmacokinetics of sumatriptan via all four routes. Usual absorption parameters were described and the rate of absorption was assessed using deconvolution technics. There were no statistical differences between the non-parenteral routes for tmax or Cmax/AUCinfinity. However, Cmax and AUCtmax were statistically greater with the suppository than with the tablet, but there was no difference between intranasal and oral routes. The highest rate of absorption occurred earlier with the intranasal than with the oral route. Relative to the subcutaneous route, the bioavailability for the suppository was greater than for intranasal spray and oral tablet. The amount of sumatriptan excreted in the urine unchanged was similar for all routes. Sumatriptan in this study was well tolerated.

Administration, Intranasal↗
PubMed1999

Mixed effect modeling of sumatriptan pharmacokinetics during drug development: II. From healthy subjects to phase 2 dose ranging in patients.

Sumatriptan is indicated for the treatment of migraine attack and cluster headache; it is currently marketed as a subcutaneous injection, nasal spray, and oral tablet. New formulations are under consideration. The knowledge of sumatriptan absorption, combined with PK/PD information would help the design of more efficient formulations. In this perspective, we attempted to model the absorption of sumatriptan by population PK analysis. Data following administration by the intravenous (i.v.), the subcutaneous (s.c.), and the oral (po) route in healthy subjects were analyzed. A large database with full kinetic profiles was constituted. Sumatriptan was administered to 215 healthy subjects (i.v., s.c., and po) and to 143 migraine sufferers (po). The mean age was 31 years (18-86 years) in healthy subject population and was 38 years (18-65 years) in migraine patients. The mean weights were 74 kg (54-104 kg) and 66 kg (38-136 kg) in healthy subjects and migraine patients, respectively, and the mean heights were 176 cm (157-193 cm) and 164 cm (152-183 cm) in healthy subjects and migraine patients, respectively. A NONMEN analysis was performed using a two-compartment disposition model. Oral absorption was modeled with a first-order input followed by a zero-order input. Less biased results were obtained using the FOCE method. The total clearance and the distribution volume at steady state were 71.2 L/hr and 94.5 L after i.v. dosing and 68.7 L/hr and 109 L after inclusion of the s.c. and po data. The absorption phase appeared to last for about 5 hr. The interindividual variability of the main PK parameters was low: It was around 20% for the total clearance and around 30% for the distribution volume at steady state. Although significant, the combination of age and height on clearance did not decrease considerably the interindividual variability of this parameter (decrease of 2.2%); nor was it possible to establish clearly if a migraine attack has an effect on drug absorption because of the sampling scheme during absorption. Simulations have shown that it would have been possible to estimate all the PK parameters with a data set reduced to one quarter of its actual number of samples.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1992

Psychoactivity and abuse potential of sumatriptan.

Sumatriptan is a 5-HT1D agonist of therapeutic use in migraine and cluster headaches. To determine the profile of psychoactivity and abuse potential, a double-blind Latin-square crossover study was conducted in 12 male subjects with histories of substance abuse. The effects of subcutaneous placebo, sumatriptan (8 and 16 mg), and morphine (10 and 20 mg) were assessed on measures of subjective, behavioral, and physiologic responses including signs, symptoms, Addiction Research Center Inventory scales, onset of drug effects and miosis. Sumatriptan was psychoactive, was discriminated from placebo, produced a dose-related decrease on euphoria scores, elevated scores on measures of apathetic sedation and disliking, and lacked identification as a prototypic drug of abuse. There were no clinically significant effects on heart rate, pupil size, or blood pressure. In contrast, morphine (the positive control) produced expected dose-response relationships on measures of reinforcing and physiologic effects. The study suggests that sumatriptan has a low abuse potential.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Investigation of the role of 5-HT1B and 5-HT1D receptors in the sumatriptan-induced constriction of porcine carotid arteriovenous anastomoses.

1. It has previously been shown that the antimigraine drug sumatriptan constricts porcine carotid arteriovenous anastomoses via 5-HT1-like receptors, identical to 5-H1B/1D receptors. The recent availability of silent antagonists selective for the 5-HT1B (SB224289) and 5-HT1D (BRL15572) receptor led us to further analyse the nature of receptors involved. 2. In pentobarbitone-anaesthetized, bilaterally vagosympathectomized pigs, sumatriptan (30, 100 and 300 microg kg(-1), i.v.) dose-dependently decreased carotid arteriovenous anastomotic conductance by up to 70+/-5%. 3. The dose-related decreases in carotid arteriovenous anastomotic conductance by sumatriptan (30, 100 and 300 microg kg(-1), i.v.) remained unchanged in animals treated (i.v.) with 1 mg kg(-1) of BRL15572 (maximum decrease: 72+/-3%), but were significantly attenuated by 1 mg kg(-1) (maximum decrease: 30+/-11%) and abolished by 3 mg kg(-1) (maximum decrease: 3+/-7%) of SB224289. The highest dose of SB224289 did not attenuate the hypertension, tachycardia or increases in carotid blood flow induced by bolus injections of noradrenaline (0.1-3 microg kg(-1), i.v.). 4. The results indicate that sumatriptan constricts porcine carotid arteriovenous anastomoses primarily via 5-HT1B, but not via 5-HT1D receptors.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

Agonist-directed trafficking explaining the difference between response pattern of naratriptan and sumatriptan in rabbit common carotid artery.

1. Sumatriptan or eletriptan produced vasocontraction in common carotid artery (CCA) by stimulating 5HT(1B) receptors (see also Akin & Gurdal, this issue). 2. Naratriptan as a 5HT(1B/D) agonist, was unable to produce vasocontraction in this artery, but inhibited the vasocontractile response induced by sumatriptan or eletriptan. 3. All these agonists inhibited forskolin-stimulated cyclic AMP production with comparable potencies and maximal responses. This inhibition was mediated by 5HT(1B) receptors: 5HT(1B) antagonist SB216641 (1 microM) completeley antagonized sumatriptan-, eletriptan- or naratriptan-induced cyclic AMP inhibition, but 5HT(1D) antagonist BRL15572 (1 microM) did not affect this response. 4. Naratriptan-induced stimulation of 5-HT(1B) receptors resulted only in adenylate cyclase inhibition, whereas stimulation of these receptors by sumatriptan or eletriptan produced vasocontraction as well. Hence, we concluded that the 5HT(1B)-mediated inhibition of adenylate cyclase was not a sufficient condition to couple the receptor stimulation to vasocontraction. 5. We discussed agonist-induced trafficking as a plausible mechanism for the observed phenomenon.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

The 40-mg dose of eletriptan: comparative efficacy and tolerability versus sumatriptan 100 mg.

Meta-analysis provides valuable information regarding relative efficacies of triptans, but head-to-head comparator studies remain the gold standard. Three similar head-to-head trials comparing eletriptan 40 mg (E40) with sumatriptan 100 mg (S100) provide a rare opportunity and sufficient power, for robust comparisons of efficacy. Data were combined from three double-blind, placebo-controlled, first-dose, first-attack acute migraine treatment studies comparing E40 (n=1132), S100 (n=1129), and placebo (n=645). The primary outcome was headache response at 2 h. Secondary outcomes included headache response at 1 h, pain-free and functional responses, and sustained headache and pain-free responses. Odds ratios were calculated for summary estimates of probability of response. There were higher headache response rates with eletriptan versus sumatriptan at 2 h (67% vs. 57%; P<0.0001) and 1 h (34% vs. 26%; P<0.0001). Eletriptan also had higher 2 h pain-free (35% vs. 25%; P<0.0001) and functional responses (67% vs. 58%; P<0.0001). Sustained headache (42%) and pain-free (22%) response rates were higher for eletriptan versus sumatriptan (34%, P<0.0001; 15%, P<0.0001). The probability of response for eletriptan versus sumatriptan ranged from 36% higher (relief of nausea) to 64% higher (sustained pain-free rate). Combined analysis demonstrates that E40 has superior efficacy versus S100 across all clinically relevant outcomes.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Changes in systolic time intervals-a non-invasive marker for the haemodynamic effects of sumatriptan.

AIMS: This study assessed the use of systolic time intervals (STI) as a potential non-invasive marker of the haemodynamic effects of sumatriptan, a 5HT1 receptor agonist. METHODS: Twenty-six patients undergoing diagnostic cardiac catheterization participated. STIs were derived from haemodynamic pressure tracings at baseline, following placebo injection and following either subcutaneous (n=18) or intravenous injection (n=8) of sumatriptan. RESULTS: Sumatriptan (i.v. or s.c.) was associated with significant increases in mean arterial pressure (95% C.I. 9,14mmHg, P=0.0001), total electromechanical systole (95% C.I.8,36ms, P<0.0001), pre-ejection period (95%C.I. 8,21ms, P=0.0001) and left ventricular ejection time (95% C.I. 2,12ms, P=0.004). Conclusion STI responses were consistent with sumatriptan-induced changes in afterload. In summary, the measurement of STIs is a potential non-invasive method of investigating the influence of serotonergic compounds on the cardiovascular system.

Blood Pressure↗
PubMed1991

Evidence for 5-HT1B/1D receptors mediating the antimigraine effect of sumatriptan and dihydroergotamine.

Neurogenic plasma extravasation, endothelial cell activation (increase in vesicle number and vacuole formation), platelet aggregation and adhesion, and mast cell degranulation occur selectively in post-capillary venules of the dura mater following electrical trigeminal ganglion stimulation, and are mediated by release of neuropeptides from perivascular unmyelinated C fibres. Pre-treatment with the antimigraine drugs dihydroergotamine and sumatriptan, two drugs that bind with high affinity to 5-HT1B/1D receptors, markedly attenuated plasma protein extravasation induced by electrical trigeminal ganglion stimulation. Trigeminal stimulation increased plasma calcitonin gene-related peptide levels in rat superior sagittal sinus. Pre-treatment with dihydroergotamine and, to a lesser extent, sumatriptan, attenuated this increase. Both drugs reduced morphological changes in post-capillary venules and mast cells within dura mater following electrical trigeminal ganglion stimulation. Plasma protein extravasation was selectively blocked in dura mater (but not in extracranial tissues) by pre-treatment with those receptor agonists showing a rank order of potency suggesting a 3-HT1B/1D interaction (5-CT greater than 5-BT greater than DHE greater than sumatriptan greater than 8-OH-DPAT). Pre-treatment with 5-HT2 and 5-HT3 antagonists was not effective. Taken together, these data are consistent with the interpretation that putative 5-HT-1B/1D receptors located on sensory fibres are coupled to inhibition of peptide release and blockade of neurogenic inflammation. An important therapeutic action of ergot alkaloids and sumatriptan in migraine headaches is so defined.

Animals↗
PubMed1992

Sumatriptan in the treatment of acute migraine with aura.

The efficacy of the selective 5HT1-like agonist sumatriptan in acute treatment of classical migraine (i.e. migraine with aura) was assessed in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group randomized trial. An oral dose of 200 mg was chosen on the basis of the efficacy rates achieved (70-85%) with 70-280 mg in open studies (1, 2). The dose of 200 mg was also chosen for the study because preliminary data from an oral pilot study indicated that efficacy increased with increasing dose up to 200 mg. Each patient was treated for a maximum of three separate attacks of migraine with aura within a three months' period. Three attacks were treated so that we could examine consistency of response across more than one attack. For attack 1, 200 mg sumatriptan was significantly more effective, safe and well tolerated than placebo at relieving headache 2 h after treatment was given (p = 0.023). In subsequent attacks, i.e. in attacks 2 and 3, there was no such significant effect of sumatriptan compared with placebo in relieving headache. This reduced efficacy of sumatriptan in the second and third attacks may be due to a high incidence of vomiting induced by the high dose of dispersible formulation and also by the bitter taste of the tablets. In addition, there was an increase in placebo response in attacks 2 and 3 compared to the first attack.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1992

Sumatriptan in chronic cluster headache: results of continuous treatment for eleven months.

A 32-year-old man received a total of 480 injections of subcutaneous sumatriptan 6 mg for the treatment of acute attacks of chronic cluster headache over an eleven-month period. Over 90% of the attacks resolved within 10 min of treatment (average 6.8 +/- 3.4). As a comparison, the average duration of 61 attacks occurring over the same period, but not treated with sumatriptan, was 56.1 +/- 20.8 min. This difference was highly significant. There was no clinical evidence of tachyphylaxis, and there were no adverse effects. This is the first report of a long-term treatment of cluster headache with sumatriptan. It is concluded that sumatriptan in this case was an effective and well-tolerated treatment for cluster headache.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Exteroceptive suppression of temporalis muscle activity during migraine attack and migraine interval before and after treatment with sumatriptan.

We compared the early (ES1) and late (ES2) exteroceptive suppression (ES) periods of temporalis muscle activity in 18 migraine patients during both the migraine interval and migraine attack and investigated the effect of sumatriptan and placebo on ES parameters. The measurements were performed in a balanced sequence at four different times on each patient, twice during the migraine interval and once in each of two migraine attacks. First ES1 and ES2 were measured (stimulus intensity 20 mA, stimulus duration 0.2 ms, stimulation frequency 2 Hz, averaging of 10 responses), then the medication was given on a double-blind basis with an autoinjector using either 6 mg sumatriptan or a placebo solution. Thirty minutes after application the measurements were repeated. No significant differences were found in early and late exteroceptive suppression latencies and durations between baseline measurements. Treatment did not affect the latencies of ES1 and ES2. While sumatriptan caused a significant increase in ES1 duration (p < or = 0.05) both during the migraine interval and during the migraine attack, placebo showed no significant effect on ES1 duration. Treatment with sumatriptan during the migraine attack was accompanied by a significant increase in the duration of ES2 (p < or = 0.05), but no significant changes in the durations of the late suppression periods were observed under any other conditions. The results do not support the assumption that under the experimental conditions chosen migraine attacks are accompanied by a paroxysmal change in the brain-stem mechanisms involved in the modulation of the ES parameters.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Risk factors for headache recurrence after sumatriptan: a study in 366 migraine patients.

Headache recurrence (HR) is the major limitation of sumatriptan in the acute treatment of migraine attacks. The risk of HR is mainly patient-dependent. We analyzed, in 366 migraine patients, clinical differences between patients who always have HR and patients who never have HR. We found remarkably few differences. HR more frequently occurred in patients with more severe attacks and longer untreated attack duration; in patients who experienced a sensation of a subclinically ongoing attack, despite headache relief after sumatriptan; and in females, mainly with menstruation-related migraine, most probably due to the more severe and longer lasting attacks these patients suffer, rather than due to hormonal factors. The incidence of HR was, among other factors, not related to the (other) clinical effects of sumatriptan, the timing of administration within the attack, the duration of use of sumatriptan, pharmacokinetic factors, or whether patients were experiencing HR after use of ergot alkaloids.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

A within-patient comparison of subcutaneous and oral sumatriptan in the acute treatment of migraine in general practice.

This study compared, for the first time in the United Kingdom, the efficacy and safety of oral 100 mg and subcutaneous 6 mg sumatriptan within a patient for the acute treatment of migraine. The patient's preference for the two formulations of sumatriptan were also recorded. The study was a multicentre, randomized, open, crossover design with an optional open parallel group extension. Individual attacks were treated with one formulation only. Over 70% of patients who treated attack 1 in both treatment periods of the crossover phase reported headache relief with each formulation at 4 h. Only 3% of patients failed to respond to at least one of the formulations at this time point. At the end of the crossover phase patient preference for the injection more than doubled from the pretreatment level in those patients who were previously naive to sumatriptan. During the optional phase of the study, 38% of patients chose to treat some attacks with oral and some with subcutaneous sumatriptan. The main reason for choosing injection was speed of relief, whilst convenience was the major reason for the use of the tablet.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1997

Sumatriptan inhibits neurogenic vasodilation of dural blood vessels in the anaesthetized rat--intravital microscope studies.

This study used intravital microscopy to measure the diameter of dural arteries in anaesthetized rats. Electrical stimulation of the surface of a closed cranial window produced increases in dural vessel diameter which were blocked by the CGRP receptor antagonist human-alpha CGRP(8-37) but unaffected by the NK1 receptor antagonist RP67580. Sumatriptan (3 and 10 mg kg-1, i.v.) significantly reduced the response to electrical stimulation. In contrast, sumatriptan (3 mg kg-1) had no effects on the response to exogenously administered CGRP. These results indicate that neurokinins play no role in neurogenic vasodilation in this preparation and that neurogenic vasodilation in rat dural vessels is mediated predominantly by CGRP. Furthermore, the data indicate that sumatriptan attenuates neurogenic vasodilation, probably by inhibiting the release of CGRP from perivascular trigeminal nerve endings innervating the dura. These experimental data parallel the clinical findings that CGRP levels are elevated in migraine and normalized, concomitantly with headache relief, by sumatriptan.

Afferent Pathways↗
PubMed1999

Prolonged migraine aura without headache arrested by sumatriptan. A case report with further considerations.

The case of a 42-year-old woman with prolonged migraine visual aura without headache, whose long-lasting episodes of visual aura were successfully controlled by oral sumatriptan, is reported. Effectiveness of sumatriptan was unequivocal, since, after taking sumatriptan, duration of aura would drop from 1.5 h to approximately 20 min. This case suggests that sumatriptan may cross the blood-brain barrier and block spreading depression.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Effects of subcutaneous sumatriptan on plasma growth hormone concentrations in migraine patients.

The purpose of this study was to assess the sensitivity of 5-HT1D receptors in migraine using sumatriptan as a pharmacological probe. The drug stimulates the release of growth hormone (GH) and this effect may be used to explore the function of cerebral serotonergic systems in vivo. We administered sumatriptan and placebo to 15 migraineurs and to 10 controls. Blood samples were collected -15, 0, 15, 30, 45, 60 and 90 min after injection. Placebo had no effect on hormone concentrations. Sumatriptan induced a significant (P<0.01) increase in GH concentrations both in migraine patients and healthy controls. The GH increase was not significantly different in the two groups. Our results suggest that cerebral serotonergic functions mediated by 5-HT1D receptors are not altered in migraine. Sumatriptan overuse could lead to adverse effects mediated by its neuroendocrine activity.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Effects of sumatriptan on cerebral blood flow under normo- and hypercapnia in rats.

To investigate further the pharmacological mechanism of an anti-migraine drug, sumatriptan, a 5-HT1B/1D receptor agonist, we studied its effect on the cerebral circulation in seven anaesthetized rats, particularly during hypercapnia. After injection of 0.6 or 6.0 microg/kg sumatriptan succinate, no significant change in cerebral blood flow (CBF) was observed either in the striatum or in the parietal cortex. The increase in CBF both in the parietal cortex and the striatum during 5% CO2 inhalation was significantly less when sumatriptan succinate 6.0 microg/kg was injected. Sumatriptan appeared to have a vasoconstrictor effect on the relaxed vessels by CO2 inhalation. This mechanism might be attributable to vasoconstriction through activation of 5-HT1B receptors located in the vascular smooth muscle rather than 5-HT1B receptors in the vascular adventitia.

Animals↗