Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Questionnaires”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 415 records · Page 23Linked to original sources
PubMed1997

Subjective experience in brain-injured patients and their close relatives: a European Brain Injury Questionnaire study.

Results are reported from an international project the aim of which has been to develop and validate a wide-ranging questionnaire suitable for administration to brain-injured patients and their relatives. A self-report questionnaire concerning subjective experience of cognitive, emotional and social difficulties (The European Brain Injury Questionnaire, EBIQ) was administered to a group of 905 brain-injured patients, and close relatives to these competed a parallel version of the questionnaire concerning the brain-injured person. The sample was drawn from seven European countries together with Brazil. The same questionnaire was also administered to a group of 203-non-brain-injured controls, similarly in self-report and relative-report versions. Scales relating to eight specific areas of functioning, together with a global scale, are derived from the questionnaire and their internal reliability was estimated in the present data. Analyses of the 63 items of the questionnaire showed consistently greater levels of problems for the brain-injured group, especially as indicated by relatives. This pattern was substantially replicated among the nine scales. The scales discriminated well between stroke patients and those who had suffered a traumatic brain injury. There was also a tendency for reported problems to be greater for patients who were surveyed later post-injury (> or = 19 months) rather than earlier. Comparison of sets of controls derived from two countries (France and Brazil) showed small but important differences. It is concluded that the questionnaire has an acceptable reliability and validity, but that it will be necessary to obtain culturally relevant non-brain-injured control data when employing it in different countries.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Test-retest reliability of a self-administered musculoskeletal symptoms and job factors questionnaire used in ergonomics research.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the test-retest reliability of questionnaire items related to musculoskeletal symptoms and the reliability of specific job factors. The type of questionnaire items described in the present study have been used by several investigators to assess symptoms of musculoskeletal disorders and problematic job factors among workers from a variety of occupations. Employees at a plastics molding facility were asked to complete an initial symptom and jobs factors questionnaire and then complete an identical questionnaire either two or four weeks later. Of the 216 employees participating in the initial round, 99 (45.8%) agreed to participate in the retest portion of the study. The kappa coefficient was used to determine repeatability for categorical outcomes. The majority of the kappa coefficients for the 58 questionnaire items were above 0.50 but ranged between 0.13 and 1.00. The section of the questionnaire having the highest kappa coefficients was the section related to hand symptoms. Interval lengths of two and four weeks between the initial test and retest were found to be equally sufficient in terms of reliability. The results indicated that the symptom and job factors questionnaire is reliable for use in epidemiologic studies. Like all measurement instruments, the reliability of musculoskeletal questionnaires must be established before drawing conclusions from studies that employ the instrument.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Mail-in questionnaire for monitoring nausea and vomiting in oncology outpatients.

A patient questionnaire designed to help pharmacists monitor nausea and vomiting in outpatients receiving cancer chemotherapy was studied. A 12-item questionnaire was designed by combining items from the Morrow Assessment of Nausea and Emesis (MANE) and the Functional Living Index-Emesis (FLIE). Items included number of vomiting episodes, duration of nausea, number of antiemetics, severity of nausea and vomiting, impact on quality of life, and adverse effects. The questionnaire was printed on an addressed, postage-paid card. Over an eight-week period, outpatients in a hospital's oncology clinic were asked to complete the questionnaire at home during the three days after chemotherapy. Of 48 patients asked, 42 (88%) agreed to complete the questionnaire, and 36 (86%) of these patients mailed it back to the clinic. Of the respondents, 11 reported at least one episode of vomiting, and 22 reported nausea. Thirteen respondents logged nausea ratings of 3 or higher on a 7-point scale. Twenty respondents used antiemetics. Responses given by the patients in follow-up telephone interviews did not differ significantly from the responses collected with the questionnaire. More than 90% of patients who returned the questionnaire rated it as simple to complete. Pharmacists used the self-reports of nausea or vomiting in 7 (17%) of 42 cases to recommend alternative antiemetic regimens. A mail-in questionnaire for monitoring nausea and vomiting in outpatients undergoing chemotherapy was completed and returned by a high percentage of patients and was useful to clinic pharmacists.

Adult↗
PubMed1986

Questionnaire assessment of patients' attitudes and beliefs about asthma.

The feasibility, face validity and repeatability of a self-complete questionnaire to assess patients' attitudes and beliefs about asthma was evaluated in 45 adult patients attending a hospital asthma clinic. The questionnaire consisted of 40 statements with which the patient agreed or disagreed by placing an 'X' along a visual analogue line. Patients completed questionnaires at their clinic consultation and then were interviewed to ascertain whether questionnaire responses agreed with a verbal description of their attitudes and beliefs. Repeatability was assessed by having patients complete an identical questionnaire four weeks after their interview. The questionnaire responses showed excellent agreement with interview findings, suggesting that face validity was good. Repeatability also appeared satisfactory in that agreement between responses on the first and second questionnaires was significant for 31 of the 40 items. Many patients (22%) incorrectly used the analogue line response scale making feasibility unacceptably low. However, subsequent studies showed this problem could be overcome by the use of a four-point Likert response scale. These findings suggest that this questionnaire is a satisfactory instrument for assessing patients' attitudes and beliefs about asthma. Its face validity appeared good and, with certain modifications, it was both feasible and repeatable.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

Relative validity and reproducibility of a French dietary history questionnaire.

BACKGROUND: A self-administered dietary history questionnaire, especially developed for use in a large French prospective cohort study, was tested for accuracy of food intake measurement by comparing it to the average of 9-12 24-hour recalls. This questionnaire was structured according to the French meal pattern. An important feature of the questionnaire was the separation into a quantification part and qualification part. The first part quantifies consumption by frequency and portion sizes per food group or food item. The second part provides more detailed qualitative information on separate items within one food group. The total number of food items in the questionnaire was 238. METHODS: The questionnaire was administered twice to 119 study subjects, with an interval of approximately one year (1990-1991). During that year, 24-hour recalls were carried out monthly. Reproducibility and relative validity of the questionnaire were assessed. RESULTS: The correlation coefficients for reproducibility ranged from 0.40 to 0.74 for foods and from 0.54 to 0.75 for nutrients. The correlation coefficients for relative validity ranged from 0.10 to 0.71 for foods and from 0.29 to 0.81 for nutrients (adjustment for total energy and attenuation for nutrients). Percentage of subjects classified in the same or adjacent quintile by questionnaire as well as by 24-hour recall was on average 76% for foods and 72% for nutrients. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that this questionnaire can be used to classify study subjects according to their food or nutrient intake over a one-year period, within a known degree of precision.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Evaluating satisfaction with maternity care in women from minority ethnic communities: development and validation of a Sylheti questionnaire.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a reliable and valid questionnaire to evaluate satisfaction with maternity care in Sylheti-speaking Bangladeshi women. DESIGN: Two-stage, psychometric study. Firstly, focus groups, in-depth interviews and iterative methods for translation and cultural adaptation were used to develop a Sylheti questionnaire, called the survey of Bangladeshi women's experience of maternity services from an English language questionnaire. Secondly, quantitative psychometric methods were used to field test and evaluate the acceptability, reliability and validity of this questionnaire. SETTING: Four hospitals providing maternity services in London, UK. STUDY PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred and forty-two women from the London Bangladeshi communities, who were in the antenatal (at least 4 months pregnant) or postnatal phase (up to 6 months after delivery). Women spoke Sylheti; a language with no accepted written form. Two purposive samples of 40 women in the antenatal or postnatal phase, one convenience sample of six women in the antenatal phase and three consecutve samples of 60 women in the postnatal phase participated in stage one. In stage two, 135 women (main sample) completed the questionnaire two months after delivery (82% response rate); 50 women (retest sample) from the main sample completed a second questionnaire two weeks later (96% response rate). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Women's views about maternity care elicited by qualitative methods and measured quantitatively using the survey of Bangladeshi women's experience of maternity services. RESULTS: The 121-item questionnaire was acceptable to women and showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's alphas 0.76-0.91), stability (test-retest reliability 0.72-0.84) and construct validity (e.g. able to detect group differences). CONCLUSION: By combining qualitative and quantitative methods, it is possible to adapt an instrument to provide an acceptable, reliable and valid Sylheti questionnaire. The approach taken in developing this questonnaire provides a model for developing outcome measures for use with other minority ethnic communities.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Use of semiquantitative food frequency questionnaires to estimate the distribution of usual intake.

The authors consider whether semiquantitative food frequency questionnaires can be used to survey a population to estimate the distribution of usual intake. They take as an assumption that, if they were possible to obtain, the mean of many food records or recalls would be an accurate representation of an individual's usual diet. They then assume that nutrient intake as measured by a questionnaire follows a linear regression model when regressed against the usual intake of that nutrient. If the coefficients in this regression relation were known, then the distribution of usual intake could be constructed from the responses to the questionnaire. Since one generally does not know the values of the coefficients, they need to be estimated from a calibration study in which respondents complete the questionnaire together with multiple food records or recalls. This can be done either through an internal subset of the data or through an independent external study. With an internal substudy, the authors find that food frequency questionnaires typically provide little information about the distribution of usual intake in addition to that obtained from the multiple records or recalls in the substudy. When the substudy is external, if it is small then having very large numbers of subjects completing food frequency questionnaires in the survey is no more efficient than having a few subjects completing food records or recalls. However, if the external substudy is large and accurately characterizes the relation between the questionnaire response and usual intake, food frequency questionnaires can provide a cost-efficient way of estimating the distribution of usual intake. These results do not apply to the different problem of correcting relative risks for the effects of measurement error.

Bias↗
PubMed1998

Comparison of the Block and the Willett self-administered semiquantitative food frequency questionnaires with an interviewer-administered dietary history.

The performances of two commonly used diet instruments, the Block and the Willett food frequency questionnaires, were compared with a longer, interviewer-administered diet history. Participants in a case-control study on diet and colon cancer were interviewed between 1990 and 1994 in northern California, Utah, and Minnesota by trained nutritionists using a validated diet history. Two separate subsamples of participants were asked to complete either the Block or the Willett questionnaire exactly 5 days after they completed the original diet history. Data were analyzed separately by subsample comparing either the Block or the Willett questionnaire with the original diet history by using means, correlations, quintile agreement, and odds ratios for the relation between several nutrients and colon cancer. The Block and the Willett questionnaires generally provided lower absolute intake estimates than did the original diet history; however, the Block questionnaire underestimated more than did that by Willett. Both correlations and quintile agreement were slightly better for the Willett questionnaire than for that by Block when compared with the original diet history. In general, point estimates obtained from either the Block or the Willett questionnaire fell within the confidence intervals of the estimates of the odds ratios obtained from the original diet history, and no real difference in significance levels appeared. Although the Block and Willett questionnaires differed slightly from each other and from our original diet history in estimating absolute nutrients and ranking or classifying individuals, they were very similar in their ability to predict disease outcome.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Reproducibility and validity of an epidemiologic questionnaire to assess past year physical activity in adolescents.

The reproducibility and validity of a past year physical activity questionnaire was determined in a sample of 100 adolescents aged 15-18 years, randomly selected from a population-based cohort. Subjects completed four 7-day recalls of activity approximately 3 months apart. The average of the four 7-day recalls of activity was utilized as the "gold standard" against which the past year questionnaire was compared to evaluate validity. The questionnaire was also validated against objective measures, such as physical fitness and body mass index. Interscholastic team rosters were utilized to directly validate the reporting of specific activities. One-month and one-year test-retest reproducibility of the questionnaire were determined. For different measures of activity, the Spearman correlations between the questionnaire and the average of the 7-day recalls ranged from 0.55 to 0.67 in males and 0.73 to 0.83 in females, all significant at p < 0.01. In general, although there was no association between the past year activity questionnaire results and objective measures, there was a significant, albeit weak association between the physical activity questionnaire and time to complete a 1-mile (1.61-km) run (r = -0.47) in females. Subjects reported participating in specific interscholastic sports with an accuracy of 100%, 86%, and 95% for the fall, winter, and spring sports, respectively. Test-retest reproducibility was higher over one month (r = 0.79) than over one year (r = 0.66). These data provide evidence that the questionnaire yields a reasonable estimate of past year or "habitual" physical activity in adolescents.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

A comparison of five low back disability questionnaires: reliability and responsiveness.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to examine 5 commonly used questionnaires for assessing disability in people with low back pain. The modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire, the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale, the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, the Waddell Disability Index, and the physical health scales of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) were compared in patients undergoing physical therapy for low back pain. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Patients with low back pain completed the questionnaires during initial consultation with a physical therapist and again 6 weeks later (n=106). Test-retest reliability was examined for a group of 47 subjects who were classified as "unchanged" and a subgroup of 16 subjects who were self-rated as "about the same." Responsiveness was compared using standardized response means, receiver operating characteristic curves, and the proportions of subjects who changed by at least as much as the minimum detectable change (MDC) (90% confidence interval [CI] of the standard error for repeated measures). Scale width was judged as adequate if no more than 15% of the subjects had initial scores at the upper or lower end of the scale that were insufficient to allow change to be reliably detected. RESULTS: Intraclass correlation coefficients (2,1) calculated to measure reliability for the subjects who were classified as "unchanged" and those who were self-rated as "about the same" were greater than.80 for the Oswestry and Quebec questionnaires and the SF-36 Physical Functioning scale and less than.80 for the Waddell and Roland-Morris questionnaires and the SF-36 Role Limitations-Physical and Bodily Pain scales. None of the scales were more responsive than any other. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Measurements obtained with the modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire, the SF-36 Physical Functioning scale, and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale were the most reliable and had sufficient width scale to reliably detect improvement or worsening in most subjects. The reliability of measurements obtained with the Waddell Disability Index was moderate, but the scale appeared to be insufficient to recommend it for clinical application. The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Role Limitations-Physical and Bodily Pain scales of the SF-36 appeared to lack sufficient reliability and scale width for clinical application.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Mode of questionnaire administration can have serious effects on data quality.

BACKGROUND: One of the main primary data collection instruments in social, health and epidemiological research is the survey questionnaire. Modes of data collection by questionnaire differ in several ways, including the method of contacting respondents, the medium of delivering the questionnaire to respondents, and the administration of the questions. These are likely to have different effects on the quality of the data collected. METHODS: This paper is based on a narrative review of systematic and non-systematic searches of the literature on the effects of mode of questionnaire administration on data quality. RESULTS: Within different modes of questionnaire administration, there were many documented potential, biasing influences on the responses obtained. These were greatest between different types of mode (e.g. self-administered versus interview modes), rather than within modes. It can be difficult to separate out the effects of the different influences, at different levels. CONCLUSIONS: The biasing effects of mode of questionnaire administration has important implications for research methodology, the validity of the results of research, and for the soundness of public policy developed from evidence using questionnaire-based research. All users of questionnaires need to be aware of these potential effects on their data.

Bias↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Reliability and validity of the Frail Elderly Functional Assessment questionnaire.

Measuring functional activity for elderly at very low functional levels remains a challenge because many functional instruments have not been standardized in a frail elderly population. The Frail Elderly Functional Assessment questionnaire (FEFA) is a 19-item, interviewer-administered questionnaire designed to assess function in frail elderly at a very low activity level. The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability and validity of this instrument in a frail elderly population. Two groups of subjects over 65 yr old were selected to test the reliability and validity of this questionnaire. Test-retest reliability was determined by correlating the responses of 29 homebound (including nursing home-bound) subjects who answered the questionnaire on two occasions 2 wk apart. To assess the validity of the FEFA, the questionnaire was administered to 23 frail, homebound (including nursing home-bound) elderly subjects who had a Mini-Mental State Examination score of > or = 18. Validity was determined by correlating patient responses to direct observations by the investigators of tasks addressed in the questionnaire. Correlation was also determined against the Katz's Activity of Daily Living index, Lawton's Instrumental Activity of Daily Living index, and the Barthel index. The reliability coefficient was 0.82. Correlation between the FEFA questionnaire and direct observation of questionnaire task performance was 0.90. Construct validity against the Katz's Activity of Daily Living, Lawton's Instrumental Activity of Daily Living, and the Barthel index showed correlations of 0.86, 0.67 and 0.91, respectively. Initial data indicate that the FEFA is a valid and reliable instrument that may be useful in assessing function in frail elderly people.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed2001

Validation of the Hughston Clinic subjective knee questionnaire using gait analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Subjective questionnaires, completed by the patient, are often used to document the status of a disabled knee. The purpose of this study was to validate the Hughston Clinic subjective knee questionnaire by describing how knee kinematics and kinetics correlated to subjective knee scores after knee injury and surgery. METHODS: Five groups were studied: patients 2 (N = 37), 6 (N = 37), and 24 (N = 8) wk after ACL reconstruction (ACLR); patients with a chronic PCL deficiency (N = 9); and uninjured controls (N = 8). A three-dimensional motion analysis system and force platform were used to measure flexion angles and knee moments during level walking and stair climbing. RESULTS: Hughston Clinic questionnaire scores were significantly correlated to mechanical descriptors measured during stair ascent and descent in the 2- and 6-wk ACLR groups (P < 0.05). The Hughston Clinic questionnaire score was correlated to several kinematic variables in the ACL reconstructed knee at 24 wk postoperative, e.g., knee flexion during walking. In the PCL deficient group, the Hughston Clinic questionnaire score was correlated with several kinetic measures, e.g., the peak moment (knee extensors). The Hughston Clinic questionnaire score was not correlated to knee mechanics in the control group. CONCLUSION: The Hughston Clinic questionnaire score has been shown to be valid in this study as it reflects some mechanical descriptors during activities of daily living in the first 6 wk post ACL reconstruction. The questionnaire also provides information on gait modifications by people coping with knee injuries.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed2002

Using the dallas pain questionnaire to classify individuals with low back pain in a working population.

STUDY DESIGN: Individuals with low back pain were classified by cluster analysis of their responses to the Dallas Pain Questionnaire. These results enabled development of an alternative simple classification tool that yielded results close to those obtained by the cluster analysis. OBJECTIVES: To use the Dallas Pain Questionnaire to classify workers with low back pain, and to develop a practical classification tool for physicians. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The severity of low back pain is important information for patient management. Questionnaires exploring the multidimensional aspect of low back pain have been used to classify individuals with low back pain. The Dallas Pain Questionnaire is a short self-administered questionnaire that explores the functional and emotional aspects of chronic low back pain. It was tested in a population still at work using a simplified scoring system. METHODS: The study included 765 persons with low back pain still at work who completed the self-administered questionnaire. Of these patients, 732 could be classified by cluster analysis according to their answers to the Dallas Pain Questionnaire. A classification tool was developed to categorize them. Using external variables, the groups thus formed were compared. RESULTS: Respondents were classified into four classes: class 1 (minor disability), class 2 (intermediate disability), class 3 (disability for some physical activities), and class 4 (physical disability and emotional disturbance). External pain-related variables were clearly associated with increasing low back pain severity as measured by this classification tool. CONCLUSIONS: The Dallas Pain Questionnaire discriminated between different groups of persons with low back pain. The proposed classification uses a short, simple practical tool to assess different levels of low back pain.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Shortened questionnaire on quality of life for inflammatory bowel disease.

Questionnaires for measuring quality of life in patients with inflammatory bowel disease usually include a large number of items and are time-consuming for both administration and interpretation. Our aim was to elaborate and validate a short quality-of-life questionnaire with the most representative items from the Spanish version of the 36-item Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ-36) using the Rasch analysis. The responses to 311 IBDQ-36 questionnaires from 167 patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and 144 with Crohn's disease (CD) were analyzed. IBDQ-36 was shortened with successive Rasch analyses until all the remaining items showed acceptable separation and goodness-of-fit properties. Validation of the short questionnaire was studied in a new group of 125 patients by determining its validity and reliability. A 9-item short questionnaire was obtained (IBDQ-9). Its correlation with IBDQ-36 was excellent (r = 0.91). Correlation between IBDQ-9 and clinical indices of activity was statistically significant in UC (r = 0.70) and CD (r= 0.70). IBDQ-9 score discriminates adequately between patients in clinical remission or relapse (P < 0.01). Sensitivity to change was determined in 14 patients who improved clinically, showing significant IBDQ-9 changes between both determinations (P < 0.01), with an effect size of -2.67 in UC and -5.29 in CD. IBDQ-9 was also homogeneous, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.95 in UC and 0.91 in CD. In 35-clinically stable patients, test-retest reliability was good, with a statistically-significant correlation between both questionnaires (r = 0.76 in UC and 0.86 in CD, P < 0.01) and an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.82 in UC and 0.84 in CD. In conclusion, a short and valid questionnaire to measure quality of life in patients with inflammatory bowel disease was obtained using a new measurement model. Its use should facilitate comprehension of the impact of inflammatory bowel disease.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Reliability and validity of adapted Turkish Version of Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) questionnaire.

STUDY DESIGN: Outcome study to determine the internal consistency, and validity of adapted Turkish version of Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) Instrument. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the validity and reliability of adapted Turkish Version of SRS-22 questionnaire. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The SRS-22 questionnaire is a widely accepted questionnaire to assess the health-related quality of life for scoliotic patients in the United States. However, its adaptation in languages other than the source language is necessary for its multinational use. METHODS: Translation/retranslation of the English version of the SRS-22 was done, and all steps for cross-cultural adaptation process were performed properly by an expert committee. Later, SRS-22 questionnaires and previously validated Short Form-36 (SF-36) outcome instruments were mailed to 82 patients who had been surgically treated for idiopathic scoliosis. All patients had a minimum of 2 years follow-up. Fifty-four patients (66%) responded to the first set of questionnaires. Forty-seven of the first time respondents returned their second survey. The average age of the 47 patients (12 male, 35 female) was 19.8 years (range, 14-31 years). The two measures of reliability as internal consistency and reproducibility were determined by Cronbach alpha statistics and intraclass correlation coefficient, respectively. Concurrent validity was measured by comparing with an already validated questionnaire (SF-36). Measurement was made using the Pearson correlation coefficient (r). RESULTS: The study demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency with high Cronbach alpha values for the four of the corresponding domains (pain, 0.72; self-image, 0.80; mental health, 0.72; and satisfaction, 0.83). However, the Cronbach alpha value for function/activity domain (0.48) was considerably lower than the original questionnaire. The intraclass correlation coefficient for the same domains was 0.80, 0.82, 0.78, 0.81, and 0.76, respectively, demonstrating a satisfactory test/retest reproducibility. Considering concurrent validity, two domains had excellent correlation (r = 0.75-1), while 9 had good correlation (r = 0.50 to 0.75), and 6 had moderate correlation (r =0.25-0.50). Based on these results, question 18 in the function/activity domain with lower Cronbach alpha value was revised while question 15 was excluded. The revised SRS-22 was given to 30 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients not included in the index study. The revision could improve the Cronbach alpha value for function/activity domain from 0.48 to 0.81. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that, if measures are to be used across cultures, the items must not only be translated well linguistically but also must be culturally adapted to maintain the content validity of the instrument at a conceptual level across different cultures. This may necessitate several validation studies to ensure and improve consistency in the content and face validity between source and target versions of a questionnaire due to difficulty in detecting subtle differences in the living habits of different cultures.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2007

Psychometric properties of the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire among nurses.

AIM: This paper reports a study investigating the psychometric properties of the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire among nurses. BACKGROUND: Although the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire is one of the most widely used instruments to measure the multifactor leadership theory in organizational sciences, inconsistent research findings have been reported for its psychometric properties. Little is known about these properties. METHOD: Data were gathered by postal questionnaires in 2001-2002 with nurses working in different healthcare organizations in Finland. A follow-up study was performed 1-year later. The sample consisted of 601 nurses and nurse leaders, and the follow-up study had 78 respondents. The internal consistency of the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire was explored using Cronbach's alpha coefficient and item-analysis, and the test-retest reliability using Pearson product moment correlation coefficient and intra-class correlation coefficient (single measure intra-class correlation coefficient). The factor structure was studied using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. RESULTS: The internal consistencies of the leadership subscales were satisfactory. The Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire was fairly stable measured at the 1-year interval. Although the data fail to support the full nine-factor model, a reduced set of items from the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire appears to show evidence of the three- and six-factor structures. Exploratory factor analysis showed evidence for the three-factor structure consisting of three distinctive, yet partly related leadership subscales. Confirmatory factor analysis showed evidence for the six-factor structure. CONCLUSION: The psychometric data suggest that a modified version of the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire is a highly suitable instrument to measure multidimensional nursing leadership. Validity and reliability were supported. The results can be used in studies applying the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Reliability and validity of a maternal food frequency questionnaire designed to estimate consumption of common food allergens.

BACKGROUND: Maternal food intake during pregnancy may influence the development of food hypersensitivity (FHS) in the child. A food frequency questionnaire estimating the frequency with which some of the mains food allergens are consumed was designed and validated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pregnant women were recruited at the ante-natal clinic of St. Mary's Hospital, Isle of Wight, UK. A food frequency questionnaire was developed and validated by comparing responses to information recorded in 7 days food diaries. The reliability of the food frequency questionnaire was evaluated by asking women to complete the questionnaire on two separate occasions at 30 and 36 weeks gestation. RESULTS: Fifty-seven women completed the validity study and 91 women completed the reliability study. For both validity and reliability, questions with dichotomous response categories showed the highest level of agreement. Frequency of intake of foods commonly "hidden" in foods produced the lowest validity and reliability scores. In the validity study responses to the food frequency questionnaire identically matched information recorded in the food diaries 80% of the time, on average. In the reliability study, responses were identical on both questionnaires 85% of the time on average. CONCLUSION: In this study a food frequency questionnaire estimating the frequency with which some of the main food allergens are consumed during pregnancy was designed and validated. This food frequency questionnaire could be used in future studies to assess the role of maternal food intake in the development of FHS in the infant.

Adolescent↗